We appreciate the commentary from Dr Costa and Dr Amato [1] on our recent study [2], in which we proposed that ventilation inhomogeneity should be regarded as an additional prospective index along with blood gases, lung mechanics and hemodynamics in a multifactorial method to optimize positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at the bedside.
We agree with Costa and Amato that some ventilation heterogeneity may be good [1]. Especially in patients with normal lungs, inhomogeneity of lung perfusion and ventilation along the gravity axis match each other - a match that is essential to optimize gas exchange. Little attention was paid, however, to isogravitational inhomogeneity of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation. When isogravitational inhomogeneity is included in the estimation, the influence of gravity is no longer dominant [3,4]. Minimizing the ventilation inhomogeneity during PEEP titration is not intended to eliminate inhomogeneity at all (which is impossible by PEEP alone), but rather to find a balance between overdistension and atelectasis. Physiological hetero geneity (good heterogeneity) may be preserved at the selected PEEP level.
The global inhomogeneity index [2] can be independently combined with any region-of-interest-definition method, if appropriate. Given that no perfect method exists currently for identification of collapsed lung areas by electrical impedance tomography, our approach [5] guarantees to include as much of the collapsed lung regions as is detectable in the analysis of ventilation inhomogeneity and provides satisfactory results, as shown in a preliminary study by comparison with computed tomography.
The titration of PEEP actually requires a multidimensional approach. A single ideal PEEP level, satisfying all clinical objectives and situations, may even not exist. A weighted combination of lung mechanics, blood gas analysis and imaging techniques to titrate PEEP therefore seems appealing and promising.
Abbreviations
PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
See related commentary by Costa and Amato, http://ccforum.com/content/14/2/134 and related research by Zhao et al., http://ccforum.com/content/14/1/R8
Contributor Information
Zhanqi Zhao, Email: zhanqi.zhao@hs-furtwangen.de.
Daniel Steinmann, Email: daniel.steinmann@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Inéz Frerichs, Email: frerichs@anaesthesie.uni-kiel.de.
Josef Guttmann, Email: josef.guttmann@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Knut Möller, Email: moe@hs-furtwangen.de.
References
- Costa EL, Amato MB. Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? Crit Care. 2010;14:134. doi: 10.1186/cc8901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Moller K. PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care. 2010;14:R8. doi: 10.1186/cc8860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glenny R. Counterpoint: Gravity is not the major factor determining the distribution of blood flow in the healthy human lung. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1533–1535. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01092.2007a. discussion 1535-1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Z, Kiefer N, Kulcsar M, Lang S, Möller K. In: XII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 27-30 May, 2010; Chalkidiki, Greece. Bamidis PD, Konstantindis ST, Bliznakova K and Pallikarakis N, editor. Springer; 2010. Ventilation inhomogeneity in upright and supine position assessed by electrical impedance tomography; p. 84. ISBN 978-960-99365-0-7. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Müller-Zivkovic D, Martin J, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Möller K. A lung area estimation method for analysis of ventilation inhomogeneity based on electrical impedance tomography. J Xray Sci Technol. 2010;18:171–182. doi: 10.3233/XST-2010-0252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]