Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1976 May;31(5):787–788. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.5.787-788.1976

Comparison of Enrichment Procedures for Fluorescent Antibody and Cultural Detection of Salmonellae in Raw Meat and Poultry

Berenice M Thomason a, David J Dodd a,1
PMCID: PMC291197  PMID: 776088

Abstract

No advantage was shown in preenriching raw meat samples for detecting salmonellae by fluorescent antibodies or culture. Trypticase soy-tryptose (Edwards and Ewing, 1972) was equal to or better than selenite-cystine as a postenrichment broth.

Full text

PDF
787

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Edel W., Kampelmacher E. H. Comparative studies on the isolation of "sublethally injured" salmonellae in nine European laboratories. Bull World Health Organ. 1973;48(2):167–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fantasia L. D., Schrade J. P., Yager J. F., Debler D. Fluorescent antibody method for the detection of Salmonella: development, evaluation, and collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1975 Jul;58(4):828–844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gabis D. A., Silliker J. H. ICMSF methods studies. II. Comparison of analytical schemes for detection of Salmonella in high-moisture foods. Can J Microbiol. 1974 May;20(5):663–669. doi: 10.1139/m74-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thomason B. M., Wells J. G. Preparation and testing of polyvalent conjugates for fluorescent-antibody detection of salmonellae. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Nov;22(5):876–884. doi: 10.1128/am.22.5.876-884.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES