Abstract
Land treatment of wastewater is an attractive alternative to conventional sewage treatment systems and is gaining widespread acceptance. Although land application systems prevent surface water pollution and augment the available water supplies, the potential dangers to human health should be evaluated. Since sewage may contain high amounts of bacterial endotoxin, the removal of endotoxin from sewage by percolation through soil was investigated. It was found that 90 to 99% of the endotoxin was removed after travel of sewage through 100 to 250 cm of loamy sand soil. When distilled water was allowed to infiltrate into the soil to simulate rainfall, the endotoxin was mobilized and moved in a concentrated band through the soil column. On testing samples from actual land treatment sites, as much as 480 ng of endotoxin per milliliter was found in some groundwater samples. The presence of endotoxin in potable water is known to be a potential problem under some circumstances, but the importance of endotoxin in water supplies has not been fully assessed. Therefore, the design, operation, and management of land application systems should take into account the fate of endotoxin in groundwater beneath the sites.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Di Luzio N. R., Friedmann T. J. Letter: Bacterial endotoxins in the environment. Nature. 1973 Jul 6;244(5410):49–51. doi: 10.1038/244049a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerba C. P., Lance J. C. Poliovirus removal from primary and secondary sewage effluent by soil filtration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Aug;36(2):247–251. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.2.247-251.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert R. G., Gerba C. P., Rice R. C., Bouwer H., Wallis C., Melnick J. L. Virus and bacteria removal from wastewater by land treatment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Sep;32(3):333–338. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.3.333-338.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holper K., Trejo R. A., Brettschneider L., Di Luzio N. R. Enhancement of endotoxin shock in the lead-sensitized subhuman primate. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Apr;136(4):593–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lance J. C., Gerba C. P., Melnick J. L. Virus movement in soil columns flooded with secondary sewage effluent. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):520–526. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.520-526.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagaraja T. G., Bartley E. E., Fina L. R., Anthony H. D., Dennis S. M., Bechtle R. M. Quantitation of endotoxin in cell-free rumen fluid of cattle. J Anim Sci. 1978 Jun;46(6):1759–1767. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.4661759x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shreeve B. J., Thomlinson J. R. Absorption of Escherichia coli endotoxin by the neonatal pig. J Med Microbiol. 1972 Feb;5(1):55–59. doi: 10.1099/00222615-5-1-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shreeve B. J., Thomlinson J. R. Hypersensitivity of young piglets to Escherichia coli endotoxin. J Med Microbiol. 1971 Aug;4(3):307–318. doi: 10.1099/00222615-4-3-307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wellings F. M., Lewis A. L., Mountain C. W., Pierce L. V. Demonstration of virus in groundwater after effluent discharge onto soil. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jun;29(6):751–757. doi: 10.1128/am.29.6.751-757.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]