Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2010 Jun 14;54(8):3326–3334. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01777-09

Image-Based High-Throughput Drug Screening Targeting the Intracellular Stage of Trypanosoma cruzi, the Agent of Chagas' Disease

Juan C Engel 1,†,*, Kenny K H Ang 2,, Steven Chen 2, Michelle R Arkin 2, James H McKerrow 1, Patricia S Doyle 1
PMCID: PMC2916317  PMID: 20547819

Abstract

Chagas' disease, caused by infection with the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is the major cause of heart failure in Latin America. Classic clinical manifestations result from the infection of heart muscle cells leading to progressive cardiomyopathy. To ameliorate disease, chemotherapy must eradicate the parasite. Current drugs are ineffective and toxic, and new therapy is a critical need. To expedite drug screening for this neglected disease, we have developed and validated a cell-based, high-throughput assay that can be used with a variety of untransfected T. cruzi isolates and host cells and that simultaneously measures efficacy against the intracellular amastigote stage and toxicity to host cells. T. cruzi-infected muscle cells were incubated in 96-well plates with test compounds. Assay plates were automatically imaged and analyzed based on size differences between the DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)-stained host cell nuclei and parasite kinetoplasts. A reduction in the ratio of T. cruzi per host cell provided a quantitative measure of parasite growth inhibition, while a decrease in count of the host nuclei indicated compound toxicity. The assay was used to screen a library of clinically approved drugs and identified 55 compounds with activity against T. cruzi. The flexible assay design allows the use of various parasite strains, including clinical isolates with different biological characteristics (e.g., tissue tropism and drug sensitivity), and a broad range of host cells and may even be adapted to screen for inhibitors against other intracellular pathogens. This high-throughput assay will have an important impact in antiparasitic drug discovery.


Trypanosoma cruzi is the etiological agent of American trypanosomiasis, or Chagas' disease, a chronic infection affecting around 12 million people in Latin America (46). In areas of endemicity, reduviid insects are responsible for the natural transmission of T. cruzi to humans. Infection can also be transmitted through contaminated blood transfusion, organ transplant, contaminated food or drink, and via a transplacental route (35, 40, 47, 50, 57, 60). In addition, Chagas' disease has become an important opportunistic infection among patients with HIV infection and other types of immunosuppression (e.g., organ transplantation and cancer), which reactivate T. cruzi infection (4, 9, 12, 18, 29). More recently, due to immigrant carriers, Chagas' disease has been reported in areas where Chagas' disease is not endemic (40; http://www.treatchagas.org). Classic clinical manifestations of Chagas' disease derive from infection of heart muscle cells leading to progressive cardiomyopathy (28, 32, 51, 53, 54, 56). Chagasic cardiopathy is the major cause of heart failure in Latin America. Sudden cardiac death accounts for 55 to 65% of deaths in Chagas' disease (52). In Brazil, development of megasyndromes is also common (41).

Chagas' chemotherapy is directed at eradicating the parasite and ameliorating clinical manifestations (2, 17, 30, 31, 48, 61, 62,). There are no vaccines and very limited drug options. Benznidazole and nifurtimox are used during the acute phase and when reactivation under immunosuppressive conditions occurs. Treatment of chronically infected patients improves cardiac status, but both compounds have significant toxicity, leading to severe adverse effects that require medical supervision (13). Retrospective studies have revealed that neither benznidazole nor nifurtimox completely clears parasitemia, and drug resistance is common (30, 62). New therapy for Chagas' disease is a critical need (21, 43).

T. cruzi is a genetically heterogeneous group of organisms (23, 24). Development of T. cruzi in mammalian hosts is characterized by an obligate intracellular cycle initiated by the entry of trypomastigotes into host cells. The infectious form rapidly transforms to a proliferating amastigote stage that remains free within the host cell cytoplasm. After a quiescent prereplicative lag period, amastigotes divide for 7 to 9 generations before transforming back to trypomastigotes that lyse the host cell and are released to the bloodstream. The length of the intracellular cycle is characteristic of each clonal T. cruzi population and may vary from 4 days to several weeks (23; J. C. Engel, unpublished data).

The intracellular life cycle of T. cruzi can be reproduced in cell culture and is used as a model for studying host-parasite interactions and for drug screening. We had previously designed a low-throughput, multidose T. cruzi drug screening method that can distinguish compounds with either trypanocidal or trypanostatic activity (26). This assay has been shown to predict antiparasitic activity in animal models of infection. With an automated fluorescence microscope system that allows the screening of large sets of compounds, we have now developed a high-throughput screening (HTS) assay in a microtiter plate format that measures inhibition of parasite proliferation. This assay can then be used to screen large numbers of potential antiparasitic agents prior to testing them with the more laborious, but more precise, trypanocidal assay.

Pharmaceutical companies have extensively used HTS technology to identify and characterize bioactive molecules for a number of human diseases, ranging from cancer to osteoporosis (3, 59). Large libraries of compounds have also been screened to identify hits for parasites (1, 33, 63). To assay diverse chemical compounds, a luciferase HTS assay was developed for Trypanosoma brucei, the bloodstream parasite that causes African sleeping sickness (42) and fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis HTS was recently used for the erythrocytic stages of malaria (63). An HTS drug screening method using T. cruzi parasites that express the Escherichia coli β-galactosidase gene has been described. This assay requires the use of transfected parasites that catalyze a colorimetric reaction with chlorophenol red β-d-galactosidase as a substrate (7, 11). The requirement for transfection of the reporter gene is a significant limitation because of the huge natural diversity of T. cruzi (23) and the difficulty in transfecting some T. cruzi populations (J. C. Engel, unpublished data).

We have now developed, optimized, and validated a cell-based HTS assay that can be used with a variety of untransfected T. cruzi isolates and host cells and that can simultaneously measure efficacy against the parasite and host cell toxicity. The flexibility of this HTS assay allows the use of any parasite strains, including recent clinical isolates that may have different biological characteristics (e.g., tissue tropism and drug sensitivity). In addition, the assay can accommodate a broad range of host cells ranging from primary cultures to established cell lines with defined biological, biochemical, and metabolic pathways. This flexibility can help better define diverse aspects of drug-parasite-host interactions (e.g., drug metabolism, targeting, or toxicity in a particular cell type). To validate our HTS assay, we have screened a library of 909 bioactive compounds (64) and identified 55 hits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture.

Bovine embryo skeletal muscle (BESM) (25) and human hepatoma Huh-7 (44) cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5 to 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) at 37°C in 5% CO2. The T. cruzi CA-I/72 clone (25) and PSD-1 strain come from chronic chagasic patients. The Sylvio-X10/7 clone and its parental strain were derived from an insect used in xenodiagnosis of an acute case in Brazil (49). T. cruzi stocks were maintained by weekly passage in BESM and Huh-7 cells. Infectious trypomastigotes were collected from culture supernatants.

Compound library.

A vinyl sulfone cysteine protease inhibitor, K11777 (also known as K777; N-methyl-piperazine-Phe-homoPhe-vinylsulfonyl-phenyl), a trypanocidal compound that has passed through rodent, dog, and primate safety studies (20, 26, 43) (SRI International Project 10043-202, 2001), was used as a positive control to standardize the protocol. Posaconazole was purchased at a pharmacy and purified (22). Nifurtimox was a kind gift from Bayer, Germany. A small set of 10 compounds, cherry-picked from the Small Molecule Discovery Center (SMDC) medicinal chemistry library, was used for assay validation versus our established, in-house trypanocidal assay (26). These compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 2 mM. A library of 909 clinical compounds donated by Iconix Biosciences and consisting largely of FDA-approved drugs was screened in a 96-well plate format. The Iconix compounds were dissolved in DMSO at 1 mM.

HTS assay and EC50.

Sterile, black 96-well plates with clear-bottom wells (Greiner Bio-One) were seeded with mammalian cells in 150 μl culture medium. BESM (2,000/well) and Huh-7 (1,000/well) cells were then infected with 103 and 5 × 103 CA-I/72 trypomastigotes, respectively, in 50 μl of culture medium/well. Sixteen hours postinfection, culture medium (200 μl/well) was replaced and test compounds (10 μM) were added as indicated. Positive control wells (100% T. cruzi growth) contained 1% (vol/vol) DMSO, while negative control wells (100% T. cruzi growth inhibition, or 0% growth) were treated with 20 μM K11777 (20, 26). Culture plates were incubated for an additional 72 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were then washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed for 2 h with 4% paraformaldehyde, and rinsed again with PBS to remove the fixative. Fifty microliters/well of Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Labs) containing the DNA fluorescent dye DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was added. Plates were kept in the dark at 4°C until image acquisition was performed. For 50% effective concentration (EC50) determinations, compounds were serially diluted 2-fold in DMSO, with final assay concentrations ranging from 0.4 to 50 μM. All other assay procedures were performed as described above.

Image acquisition and data analyses.

Plates were screened in an IN Cell Analyzer 1000 (GE Healthcare). The excitation and emission filters used to detect DAPI were 350/50 nm and 460/40 nm, respectively. Seven image fields (10×) were acquired per well, each with an exposure time of 150 ms. The IN Cell Workstation 3.5 multitarget analysis module was used for image analyses. Top-hat segmentation parameters were set to identify host “nuclei” with a minimum area of 125 μm2, while intracellular parasite kinetoplasts were defined as “organelles” using a segmentation range of 1 to 2 μm2. The ratio of parasite kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) to host nuclei was selected as the measurement output.

For assessment of the assay window, the untreated/treated ratio (signal/background [S/B] ratio) was calculated using the equation S/B = μc +c, where μc+ and μc are the mean values of positive and negative controls, respectively. As large screens are expensive in time and resources, the Z′ value is used to quantify the suitability of a particular high-throughput screen and as a measure of statistical effect size. The assay performance was then assessed using the Z′ value, defined by the equation Z′ = 1 − [(3σc++ 3σ c)/(μc+ − μc)], where σχ+ and σχ− are the standard deviations of positive and negative controls, respectively (65). EC50 curve fitting was carried out using GraphPad Prism 4 Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Selectivity windows (cell toxicity EC50/T. cruzi EC50) and percentage of inhibition were calculated for each compound.

RESULTS

Development of an HTS assay.

To identify bioactive compounds against pathogenic T. cruzi amastigotes, we developed a 96-well-plate, cell-based HTS assay suitable for screening compound libraries. The assay was standardized for BESM and Huh-7 cells using a cell/trypomastigote ratio that yielded an infection of approximately 30% of cells. Intracellular T. cruzi amastigotes may be visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1A). In the HTS assay, both host cell nuclei and T. cruzi kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) were labeled with DAPI, which stains kDNA more strongly than parasite nuclei (Fig. 1 and 2). No significant differences in kDNA and nucleic DNA (N-DNA) staining that might interfere with HTS data collection were observed between various T. cruzi strains with the exposures used to collect images (Fig. 2) (data not shown). To determine the assay window and assay performance, we collected seven image fields per well with an IN Cell microscope (10×). Typical BESM nuclei measure over 10 μm in diameter, while amastigote kinetoplasts are 1 to 2 μm in diameter (Fig. 1 and 2). These significant size differences were exploited for image segmentation (Fig. 1B).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

(A) Amplified fluorescence image obtained in the IN Cell Analyzer 1000 (10×) of BESM nuclei (N) and T. cruzi kDNA (k) stained with DAPI. (B) Image segmentation of BESM nuclei (blue outline) and T. cruzi kDNA (yellow outline) using the Developer Toolbox software. Each size bar is 10 μm.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Representative images collected with the IN Cell 1000 microscope of BESM cells infected with T. cruzi for 88 h (10×). (A) Untreated control. Similar T. cruzi-infected cells are amplified in Fig. 1. (B) Culture treated with 20 μM K11777 for 72 h. Arrows indicate intracellular parasites also highlighted in yellow by IN Cell software. Inserts show the relative fluorescence of DAPI-stained parasite kDNA (k) and nucleic (n) DNA and host cell nucleus (N) (40×).

To evaluate compound bioactivity, we calculated kDNA/host cell nucleus (parasite/host) ratios. A significant reduction in the parasite/host ratio in treated cultures, as compared to untreated controls, provided a quantitative measure of parasite growth inhibition after 72 h of treatment. Images from the IN Cell Analyzer 1000 showed a marked reduction of parasites in cells treated with the trypanocidal drug K11777 as compared to untreated controls (Fig. 2). The mean number of parasites/cell for infected untreated (S) cells was 3.64 ± 0.59 in 16 different optical fields (n = 16 wells), and for infected cells treated with 20 μM K11777 (B), the mean value was 0.27 ± 0.04 (n = 16 wells) (Fig. 3A). The untreated/treated (S/B) ratio was 13.44, and the Z′ value was 0.45. The mean for noninfected host cells (0.01 ± 0.0008) (background and nonspecific counts) (n = 16) was negligible and, consequently, was not used to correct parasite counts. T. cruzi replication did not cause significant host cell lysis within the 4-day screening period used.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

(A) K11777 prevents T. cruzi development in BESM cells. Mean numbers of parasites/cell are higher in untreated controls than in cultures treated with 20 μM K11777. Standard deviations are shown as error bars. (B) K11777 does not induce cell toxicity, as evidenced by similar counts of BESM cell nuclei of untreated and treated controls. Standard deviations are shown as error bars.

Counts of host nuclei were used as a quantitative measure of cell toxicity induced by compounds. A reduction in mammalian host nuclei for a test compound was indicative of compound toxicity. No statistically significant differences were found between the mean count of host nuclei for untreated control cells (973 ± 178) (0% growth inhibition) and that for K11777-treated cells (887 ± 174) (n = 16) at a concentration that induced 100% T. cruzi growth inhibition, confirming the absence of in vitro drug toxicity for K11777 (Fig. 3B).

Our HTS assay was designed to evaluate the effect of a single drug dose on parasite growth at a fixed time point postinfection (88 h). In contrast, our more laborious trypanocidal assay is a multidose treatment method that uses nonproliferating, irradiated host cells and can differentiate between trypanostatic and trypanocidal compounds. Differences between both assays are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Comparison of HTS and trypanocidal assays

Parameter Characteristic
HTS assay Trypanocidal assay
Host cells All mammalian cell lines Irradiated J774 macrophages
T. cruzi All strains All strains
Method 96-well plates 12- to 24-well plates
Single dose of compound Multiple doses of compound
Time point fixed at 88 h postinfection Time point not fixed
Readout All compounds evaluated at 88 h Requires phase-contrast microscopy by observer
Automated (IN Cell) Requires completion of the intracellular life cycle
Drugs verified as ineffective at 5 days
Compounds verified as trypanostatic between 6 and 40 days
Compounds verified as effective and trypanocidal at 40 days
Information provided Growth inhibition Cure vs no cure

To validate the T. cruzi HTS imaging assay, we double tested 10 compounds that exhibited various degrees of inhibition in our well-established trypanocidal assay (26). Results summarized in Table 2 indicate a good correlation of compound activity between both assays. Compounds showing selectivity windows of >3 (cell toxicity EC50/T. cruzi EC50) in the 4-day HTS assay correlated well with the prolonged survival (>40 days) in the trypanocidal assay using T. cruzi-infected macrophages. Compounds with lower selectivity indexes (<3) had lower or negligible activity in the long-term assay. In one instance, SMDC compound 256064 with a selectivity window value of >3, was toxic to macrophage cells in the long-term trypanocidal assay. For further validation, we determined EC50s for K11777, posaconazole, and nifurtinox using three different T. cruzi stocks (Table 3). These EC50 determinations confirm the efficacy and sensitivity of the HTS assay with various T. cruzi isolates. These results also show a higher sensitivity of Sylvio-X-10/7 to posaconazole and nifurtimox than the other parasite strains, while PSD-1 showed higher resistance to nifurtimox.

TABLE 2.

Validation of the HTS assay

SMDC compound no. Chemotype Trypanocidal assay result (40 days of incubation at 10 μM) HTS assay (4 days)
T. cruzi EC50 (μM) Cell toxicity EC50 (μM) Selectivity windowa
256122 Vinylsulfone >40 days of survival (trypanocidal) 1 >20 >20
256123 Vinylsulfone >40 days of survival (trypanocidal) 1 7 7
256162 Vinylsulfone >40 days of survival (trypanocidal) 4 15 3.8
256157 Vinylsulfone >40 days of survival (trypanocidal) 6 >20 >3.3
256171 Oxadiazole ∼19 days of survival (trypanostatic) 10 >20 >2
256064 Vinylsulfone Toxic to macrophages 3 11 3.7
256037 Vinylsulfone Toxic to macrophages 8 18 2.3
256002 Vinylsulfone Toxic to macrophages 11 17 1.5
256189 Oxadiazole 5 days of survival (not active) 13 >20 >1.5
281566 Oxadiazole 5 days of survival (not active) >20 >20 1
a

Cell toxicity EC50/T. cruzi EC50.

TABLE 3.

EC50 values for different T. cruzi isolates

T. cruzi strain EC50 (μM)a
K11777 Posaconazole Nifurtimox
CA-I/72 4.2 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.03 1.2 ± 0.4
Sylvio-X10/7 3.0 ± 0.5 0.08 ± 0.02 0.7 ± 0.2
PSD-I 3.0 ± 0.2 0.13 ± 0.02 2.1 ± 0.3
BESM (host cell) >20.0 >2.0 >10.0
a

EC50s are means ± standard errors from two independent experiments each run in duplicate.

Drug library screens.

As a validation of the assay, a library of 909 drugs mainly approved by FDA was screened in singlicate (n = 1) at 10 μM. Compounds identified as “primary hits” (161 [17.7%]) were arbitrarily selected based on a cutoff of ≥53% T. cruzi growth inhibition calculated from the parasite/host ratio and ≤32% cell toxicity as calculated from comparative counts of host nuclei between treated and untreated cultures. This low threshold was purposely selected to evaluate sensitivity of the HTS assay. Cutoff values were selected as 1 standard deviation away from the mean value of all compounds tested. Using the primary hit criteria, 63 compounds were selected, giving a screening hit rate of 6.9% based on the cell toxicity inhibition cutoff of ≤32%. Of these, 55 compounds (6%) were confirmed as “hits” in a dose-response study with determinations of T. cruzi EC50 of ≤50 μM (confirmed hit rate of 87% and overall library hit rate of 6%). The identity and efficacy of the confirmed hits are summarized in Table 4. The chemical structures and therapeutic use of clinical compounds with a >5-fold selectivity window against T. cruzi are shown in Table 5 . Typical dose-response analyses for each hit are exemplified in Fig. 4, which shows EC50 calculations for Iconix compound 130071 (fluphenazine dihydrochloride). The EC50s obtained for 130071 were 4 μM for T. cruzi amastigotes and 21 μM for BESM cells, with a selectivity window of 5.25.

TABLE 4.

Identity and efficacy of confirmed hits

Compound T. cruzi EC50 (μM) Cell toxicity EC50 (μM) Selectivity windowa
Furazolidone <0.4 >50 >125
Cycloheximide <0.4 >50 >125
Terconazole <0.4 24 >60
Docetaxel <0.8 44 >56
Azelastine 1 49 49
Amiodarone 0.8 36 45
RWJ-68354 5 >50 >10
Dihydroergocristine mesylate 5 47 9.4
Mycophenolate mofetil 7 >50 >7.1
Clomipramine 8 >50 >6.3
Nitrofurazone 8 >50 >6.3
Fluphenazine 4 21 5.3
Vinorelbine 10 >50 >5.0
Haloperidol 7 33 4.7
Metergoline 4 18 4.5
Kainic acid 3 13 4.3
Phenothiazine 6 26 4.3
Loperamide 3 12 4.0
Carvedilol 8 31 3.9
Imatinib 9 32 3.6
Hydroxyprogesterone 5 17 3.4
Nifursol 15 >50 >3.3
3,3′,4′,5-Tetrachlorosalicylanilide 8 26 3.3
Abamectin 4 12 3.0
U-78517f 17 >50 >2.9
Genaconazole 18 >50 >2.8
Benztropine 17 46 2.7
Nelfinavir 12 32 2.7
Perphenazine 5 13 2.6
Promazine 13 33 2.5
Desloratadine 12 30 2.5
Lomerizine 9 22 2.4
Dyclonine hydrochloride 15 36 2.4
Ergocornine 18 43 2.4
Fluoxetine 7 16 2.3
Doxazosin 12 27 2.3
Raloxifene 10 22 2.2
Tacrine 24 >50 >2.1
Amitraz 16 33 2.1
Amitriptyline 12 23 1.9
Loratadine 9 17 1.9
Nefazodone 8 15 1.9
Tirilazad 28 >50 >1.8
Myrtecaine 14 24 1.7
Cyproterone acetate 32 >50 >1.6
Norethindrone acetate 17 28 1.6
Clobetasol propionate 25 41 1.6
Naftopidil 11 18 1.6
1-Benzylimidazole 35 >50 >1.4
Bopindolol 40 >50 >1.3
Prazosin 12 16 1.3
Sibutramine 8 10 1.3
Homochlorcyclizine 12 13 1.1
Naloxonazine 17 16 0.9
C8 ceramide 13 11 0.8
a

Cell toxicity EC50/T. cruzi EC50.

TABLE 5.

Chemical structures and therapeutic use of clinical compounds with a >5-fold selectivity window against T. cruzi

graphic file with name zac9991091860005.jpggraphic file with name zac999109186005a.jpg
a

As described in reference 64.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Titration of fluphenazine and Iconix compound 130071 and EC50 values for T. cruzi and BESM cells. IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.

DISCUSSION

High-content analysis is a powerful tool for drug discovery, as the technique combines both the biological relevance of cell-based assays with image data sets that can be queried for multiple measurements. In the T. cruzi HTS assay herein reported, we strived for simplicity and cost effectiveness by using a single dye, DAPI, to stain both host nuclei and parasite kDNA. The HTS assay allowed differentiation of host cells and intracellular parasites based on significant size differences between nuclei and kinetoplasts, respectively (Fig. 1 and 2). Such discrimination is not possible using conventional HTS microplate readers that can only measure total fluorescent signals.

The HTS assay is not constrained to a specific strain of T. cruzi or host cell. In fact, the one-stain-for-two-species imaging method can be applied to assays involving other intracellular stages of parasites such as Leishmania and Toxoplasma gondii. In addition to screening libraries for drug leads, the HTS assay may well be used for the identification of factors that modulate the intracellular life cycle of T. cruzi or other intracellular pathogens.

The imaging HTS assay was timed so that the T. cruzi strain used had not completed its intracellular life cycle (88 h postinfection). Consequently, no significant host cell lysis was observed and parasites remained within the cytoplasm. Imaging prior to host cell lysis allowed us to perform all necessary culture steps and the fixation process without parasite loss, thus avoiding underestimation of parasite counts. To validate the HTS imaging assay, results from 10 compounds were evaluated comparatively with our nonautomated, multidose trypanocidal assay (26). Although the HTS assay was not designed to identify trypanocidal compounds but only compounds that hinder parasite growth, the results correlated well with those of the trypanocidal assay (Table 2). The HTS assay is therefore a useful tool to first identify bioactive compound hits from large libraries. The trypanocidal assay can be time-consuming and has low throughput due to the need for long-term incubation (40 days) and manual microscopic inspection of the cultures. In the HTS assay, seven image fields per well in a 96-well plate were captured within 17 min. The fluorescent signal from DAPI-stained nuclei and kinetoplasts remained stable for days, thus enabling a substantial gain in throughput by processing at least 25 plates together, corresponding to 2,000 compounds for a primary screening or 250 compounds for EC50 determinations, within a workday. Plates were screened in the IN Cell Analyzer 1000 imager fitted with an automated robotic arm. Image data sets queried with one algorithm could be revisited to quantify additional features. Thus, simple reanalysis of the existing data set could provide a higher content of information.

HTS and medium-throughput assays have been developed for other parasitic diseases (1, 42, 63). Constraints in their use for T. cruzi are a consequence of the particular biological characteristics of the life cycle of this parasite. The only multiplying stage of the parasite in the mammalian host is intracellular, preventing the use of bioluminescence measurements to quantify metabolic activity like ATP production (42). Genetically modified parasites that express transfected foreign proteins have been engineered and used successfully to screen chemical libraries (7, 11). However, the use of different populations of T. cruzi including clinical isolates in such assays is constrained by the difficulty in establishing stable transfectants of many parasite strains.

To address enormous unmet medical needs, there have been recent efforts in “repurposing” drugs (14, 15, 45, 55) from other therapies even for neglected parasitic diseases (5, 8, 19, 27, 34, 38, 39). The current therapeutic drugs for Chagas' disease were developed more than 40 years ago and have severe side effects (13). In addition, they are not efficient in clearing parasite infections in the chronic stage of the disease and there are naturally drug-resistant populations of T. cruzi (30). In an effort to repurpose clinical drugs from other therapies for neglected tropical diseases, we screened a small library of FDA-approved drugs and identified 17 compounds that showed at least 5-fold selectivity between the inhibition of T. cruzi and host cell toxicity (Table 4). Of these, five compounds (cycloheximide, nitrofurazone, furazolidone, terconazole, and nelfinavir) are anti-infective drugs against bacteria, fungi, or viruses (e.g., HIV), while the other 12 are used in various medical therapies. Among the hits identified, the topical antibiotic nitrofurazone has been reported to have in vitro activity against T. cruzi (16) and has been administered orally in the treatment of Trypanosoma brucei subsp. gambiense sleeping sickness (27). Another nitrofuran, furazolidone, is active against T. cruzi in mice (8). Trypanocidal activity has been reported for docetaxel (39), cycloheximide (34), and amiodarone (5). Nelfinavir, an HIV protease inhibitor, is active against Toxoplasma gondii (19). Haloperidol, an antipsychotic drug associated with the blockade of postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptors, is also active against Toxoplasma gondii (38) and was previously reported as inactive against the trypomastigote form of T. cruzi (37). Fluphenazine is a member of the phenothiazines that has been shown to inhibit the growth of T. brucei in vitro (58) but was inactive (36) or weakly active (6) against the T. cruzi enzyme trypanothione reductase. Carvedilol, a β-adrenergic receptor blocker, was demonstrated to improve Chagas' cardiomyopathy in patients when added to treatment with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (10). It will be interesting to reexamine the relationships between the therapeutic mode of action of these clinical compounds and their trypanocidal activity.

Taken together, our results indicate that the cell-based imaging HTS assay can be conveniently deployed as a primary screen in the drug discovery pipeline for Chagas' disease.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grant NINDS-R21, NS067590-01 (to J.C.E.), the Sandler Foundation, and the QB3-Malaysia Postgraduate and Postdoctoral Training Program (to K.H.A. and M.R.A.).

We acknowledge GE Healthcare for the IN Cell Analyzer 1000 and H. G. Zhang for technical assistance.

This work was performed in memory of Dr. James A. Dvorak, NIH.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 14 June 2010.

The authors have paid a fee to allow immediate free access to this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abdulla, M. H., D. S. Ruelas, B. Wolff, J. Snedecor, K. C. Lim, F. Xu, A. R. Renslo, J. Williams, J. H. McKerrow, and C. R. Caffrey. 2009. Drug discovery for schistosomiasis: hit and lead compounds identified in a library of known drugs by medium-throughput phenotypic screening. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3:478-480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Añez, N., H. Carrasco, H. Parada, G. Crisante, A. Rojas, C. Fuenmayor, N. Gonzalez, G. Percoco, R. Borges, P. Guevara, and J. L. Ramirez. 1999. Myocardial parasite persistence in chronic chagasic patients. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60:726-732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Armstrong, J. W. 1999. A review of high-throughput screening approaches for drug discovery. Combinatorial Chem. Rev. http://www.combichemistry.com/review.html.
  • 4.Barcan, L., O. Luna, L. Clara, A. Sinagra, A. Valledor, A. M. De Rissio, A. Gadano, M. M. Garcia, E. de Santibañes, and A. Riarte. 2005. Transmission of T. cruzi infection via liver transplantation to a non-reactive recipient for Chagas' disease. Liver Transpl. 11:1112-1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benaim, G., J. M. Sanders, Y. Garcia-Marchan, C. Colina, R. Lira, A. R. Caldera, G. Payares, J. M. Burgos, A. Leon-Rossell, J. L. Concepcion, A. G. Schijman, C. Sanoja, M. Levin, E. Oldfield, and J. A. Urbina. 2006. Amiodarone has intrinsic anti-Trypanosoma cruzi activity and acts synergistically with posaconazole. J. Med. Chem. 49:892-899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Benson, T. J., J. H. McKie, J. Garforth, A. Borges, A. H. Fairlamb, and K. T. Douglas. 1992. Rationally designed selective inhibitors of trypanothione reductase. Phenothiazines and related tricyclics as lead structures. Biochem. J. 286:9-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bettiol, E., M. Samanovic, A. S. Murkin, J. Raper, F. Buckner, and A. Rodriguez. 2009. Identification of three classes of heteroaromatic compounds with activity against intracellular Trypanosoma cruzi by chemical library screening. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3:e384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beveridge, E., I. Caldwell, V. Latter, R. Neal, V. Udall, and M. Waldron. 1980. The activity against Trypanosoma cruzi and cutaneous leishmaniasis, and toxicity, of moxipraquine (349C59). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 74:43-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bocchi, E. A., and A. Fiorelli, for the First Guidelines Group for Heart Transplantation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. 2001. The paradox of survival results after heart transplantation for cardiomyopathy caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 71:1833-1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Botoni, F. A., P. A. Poole-Wilson, A. L. P. Ribeiro, D. O. Okonko, B. M. R. Oliveira, A. S. Pinto, M. M. Teixeira, A. L. Teixeira, Jr., A. M. Reis, J. B. D. Dantas, C. S. Ferreira, W. C. Tavares, Jr., and M. O. C. Rocha. 2007. A randomized trial of carvedilol aftermrenin-angiotensin system inhibition in chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy. Am. Heart J. 153:544-548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buckner, F. S., C. L. Verlinde, A. C. La Flamme, and W. C. Van Voorhis. 1996. Efficient technique for screening drugs for activity against Trypanosoma cruzi using parasites expressing beta-galactosidase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2592-2597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Campos, S. V., T. M. Strabelli, V. Amato Neto, P. Christiano, C. P. Silva, F. Fernando, A. Edimar, E. A. Bocchi, and N. A. G. Stolf. 2008. Risk factors for Chagas' disease reactivation after heart transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 27:597-602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Castro, J. A., M. M. de Mecca, and L. C. Bartel. 2006. Toxic side effects of drugs used to treat Chagas' disease (American trypanosomiasis). Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 25:471-479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen, D., and Q. P. Dou. 2008. New uses for old copper-binding drugs: converting the pro-angiogenic copper to a specific cancer cell death inducer. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 12:739-748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chong, C.R., and D. J. Sullivan, Jr. 2007. New uses for old drugs. Nature 448:645-646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chung, M. C., V. R. C. Guido, T. F. Martinelli, M. F. Goncalves, M. C. Polli, K. C. A. Botelho, E. A. Varanda, C. Colli, T. M. Miranda, and E. I. Ferreira. 2003. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of potential antichagasic hydroxymethylnitrofurazone (NFOH-121): a new nitrofurazone prodrug. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11:4779-4783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Andrade, A. L., F. Zicker, R. M. de Oliveira, S. Almeida Silva, A. Luquetti, L. R. Travassos, I. C. Almeida, S. S. de Andrade, J. G. de Andrade, and C. M. Martelli. 1996. Randomised trial of efficacy of benznidazole in treatment of early Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Lancet 348:1407-1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Faria, J. B., and G. Alves. 1993. Transmission of Chagas' disease through cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 56:1583-1584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Derouin, F., and M. Santillana-Hayay. 2000. Anti-Toxoplasma activities of antiretroviral drugs and interactions with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 449:2575-2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Doyle, P. S., Y. M. Zhou, J. C. Engel, and J. H. McKerrow. 2007. A cysteine protease inhibitor cures Chagas' disease in an immunodeficient-mouse model of infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3932-3939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Doyle, P. S., M. Sajid, T. O'Brien, K. Dubois, J. C. Engel, Z. B. Mackey, and S. Reed. 2008. Drugs targeting parasite lysosomes. Curr. Pharm. Des. 14:889-900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Doyle, P. S., C. K. Chen, J. B. Johnston, S. D. Hopkins, S. S. F. Leung, M. P. Jacobson, J. C. Engel, J. H. McKerrow, and L. M. Podust. 2010. A nonazole CYP51 inhibitor cures Chagas' disease in a mouse model of acute infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:2480-2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dvorak, J. A. 1984. The natural heterogeneity of Trypanosoma cruzi: biological and medical implications. J. Cell. Biochem. 24:357-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Elias, M. C., N. Vargas, L. Tomazi, A. Pedroso, B. Zingales, S. Schenkman, and M. R. Briones. 2005. Comparative analysis of genomic sequences suggests that Trypanosoma cruzi CL Brener contains two sets of non-intercalated repeats of satellite DNA that correspond to T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II types. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 140:221-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Engel, J. C., P. S. Doyle, and J. A. Dvorak. 1985. Trypanosoma cruzi: biological characterization of 19 clones from two chagasic patients. II. Quantitative analysis of the intracellular cell cycle. J. Protozool. 32:80-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Engel, J. C., P. S. Doyle, I. Hsieh, and J. H. McKerrow. 1998. Cysteine protease inhibitors cure an experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J. Exp. Med. 188:725-734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Evens, F., K. Niemegeers, and A. Packchanian. 1957. Nitrofurazone therapy of Trypanosoma gambiense sleeping sickness in man. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 6:665-678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ferreira, A. W., and S. D. de Avila. 1995. Laboratory diagnosis of Chagas' heart disease. Sao Paulo Med. J. 13:767-771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferreira, M. S., A. Nishioka Sde, M. T. Silvestre, A. S. Borges, F. R. Nunes-Araujo, and A. Rocha. 1997. Reactivation of Chagas' disease in patients with AIDS: report of three new cases and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:1397-1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Filardi, L. S., and Z. Brener. 1987. Susceptibility and natural resistance of Trypanosoma cruzi strains to drugs used clinically in Chagas' disease. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81:755-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gallerano, R. R., and R. R. Sosa. 2005. Interventional study in the natural evolution of Chagas' disease. Evaluation of specific antiparasitic treatment. Retrospective-prospective study of antiparasitic therapy. Rev. Fac. Cien. Med. Univ. Nac. Cordoba 57:135-162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garzon, S. A., A. M. Lorga, and J. C. Nicolau. 1995. Electrocardiography in Chagas' heart disease. Sao Paulo Med. J. 113:802-813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gould, M. K., X. L. Vu, T. Seebeck, and H. P. de Koning. 2008. Propidium iodide-based methods for monitoring drug action in the kinetoplastidae: comparison with the Alamar Blue assay. Anal. Biochem. 382:87-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grellier, P., V. Sinou, and J. Schrevel. 1995. Differential actions of antimicrotubular drugs on the development of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease. Biol. Cell 84:92. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gurtler, R. E., E. L. Segura, and J. E. Cohen. 2003. Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Argentina. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:29-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gutierrez-Correa, J., A. H. Fairlamb, and A. O. Stoppani. 2001. Trypanosoma cruzi trypanothione reductase is inactivated by peroxidase-generated phenothiazine cationic radicals. Free Radic. Res. 34:363-378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hammond, D. J., B. Cover, and W. E. Gutteridge. 1984. A novel series of chemical structures active in vitro against the trypomastigote form of Trypanosoma cruzi. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 78:91-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jones-Brando, L., E. F. Torrey, and R. Yolken. 2003. Drugs used in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder inhibit the replication of Toxoplasma gondii. Schizophr. Res. 62:237-244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kinnamon, K. E., B. T. Poon, W. L. Hanson, and V. B. Waits. 1998. Activity of anticancer compounds against Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58:804-806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kirchhoff, L. V., P. Paredes, A. Lomeli-Guerrero, M. Paredes-Espinoza, C. S. Ron-Guerrero, M. Delgado-Mejia, and J. G. Pena-Munoz. 2006. Transfusion-associated Chagas' disease (American trypanosomiasis) in Mexico: implications for transfusion medicine in the United States. Transfusion 46:298-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lages-Silva, E., E. Crema, L. E. Ramirez, A. M. Macedo, S. D. Pena, and E. Chiari. 2001. Relationship between Trypanosoma cruzi and human chagasic megaesophagus: blood and tissue parasitism. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65:435-441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mackey, Z. B., A. M. Baca, J. P. Mallari, B. Apsel, A. Shelat, E. J. Hansell, P. K. Chiang, B. Wolff, K. R. Guy, J. Williams, and J. H. McKerrow. 2006. Discovery of trypanocidal compounds by whole cell HTS of Trypanosoma brucei. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 67:355-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McKerrow, J. H., P. S. Doyle, J. C. Engel, L. M. Podust, S. A. Robertson, R. Ferreira, T. Saxton, M. Arkin, I. D. Kerr, L. S. Brinen, and C. S. Craik. 2009. Two approaches to discovering and developing new drugs for Chagas' disease. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 104:263-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nakabayashi, H., K. Taketa, T. Yamane, M. Miyazaki, K. Miyano, and J. Sato. 1984. Phenotypical stability of a human hepatoma cell line, HuH-7, in long-term culture with chemically defined medium. Gann 75:151-158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Olden, K. W. 2005. The use of antidepressants in functional gastrointestinal disorders: new uses for old drugs. CNS Spectr. 10:891-896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.PAHO. 2006. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Estimación cuantitativa de la enfermedad de Chagas en las Americas. Montevideo, Uruguay, 2006. http://www.bvsops.org.uy/pdf/chagas19.
  • 47.Pereira, K. S., F. L. Schmidt, A. M. Guaraldo, R. M. Franco, V. L. Dias, and L. A. Passos. 2009. Chagas' disease as a food borne illness. J. Food Prot. 72:441-446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pinto Dias, J. C. 2006. The treatment of Chagas' disease (South American trypanosomiasis). Ann. Intern. Med. 144:772-774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Postan, M., J. J. Bailey, J. A. Dvorak, J. P. McDaniel, and E. W. Potala. 1987. Studies of Trypanosoma cruzi clones in inbred mice. III. Histopathological and electrocardiographical responses to chronic infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 37:541-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.ProMED. 2005. Trypanosomiasis, foodborne—Brazil (Santa Catarina) ProMED-mail 24 Mar: 20050324.0847. http://www.promedmail.org.
  • 51.Punukollum, G., R. M. Gowda, and I. A. Khan. 2004. Early twentieth century descriptions of the Chagas heart disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 95:347-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rassi, A., Jr., S. G. Rassi, and A. Rassi. 2001. Sudden death in Chagas' disease. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 76:75-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ribeiro, A. L. P., A. M. dos Reis, M. V. L. Barros, M. R. de Sousa, A. L. L. Rocha, A. Arantes Perez, J. Braga Pereira, F. Santana Machado, and M. O. C. Rocha. 2002. Brain natriuretic peptide and left ventricular dysfunction in Chagas' disease. Lancet 360:461-462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Samuel, J., M. Oliveira, R. R. Correa De Araujo, M. A. Navarro, and G. Mucillo. 1983. Cardiac thrombosis and thromboembolism in chronic Chagas' heart disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 52:147-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sannella, A. R., A. Casini, C. Gabbiani, L. Messori, A. R. Bilia, F. F. Vincieri, G. Giancarlo Majori, and C. Severini. 2008. New uses for old drugs. Auranofin, a clinically established antiarthritic metallodrug, exhibits potent antimalarial effects in vitro: mechanistic and pharmacological implications. FEBS Lett. 582:844-847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Scanavacca, M., and E. Sosa. 1995. Electrophysiologic study in chronic Chagas' heart disease. Sao Paulo Med. J. 113:841-850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schmunis, G. A. 1999. Prevention of transfusional Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Latin America. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 94:93-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Seebeck, T., and P. Gehr. 1983. Trypanocidal action of neuroleptic phenothiazines in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 9:197-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Torrance, C. J., V. Agrawal, B. Volgestein, and K. W. Kinzler. 2001. Use of human cancer cells for high throughput screening and discovery. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:940-945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Triquell, M. F., C. Díaz-Luján, H. Freilij, P. Paglini, and R. E. Fretes. 2009. Placental infection by two subpopulations of Trypanosoma cruzi is conditioned by differential survival of the parasite in a deleterious placental medium and not by tissue reproduction. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 103:1011-1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Villar, J. C., J. A. Marin-Neto, S. Ebrahim, and S. Yusuf. 2002. Trypanocidal drugs for chronic asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1:119-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Viotti, R., C. Vigliano, B. Lococo, G. Bertocchi, M. Petti, M. G. Alvarez, M. Postan, and A. Armenti. 2006. Long-term cardiac outcomes of treating chronic Chagas' disease with benznidazole versus no treatment: a nonrandomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:724-734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Weisman, J. L., A. P. Liou, A. A. Shelat, F. E. Cohen, R. K. Guy, and J. L. DeRisi. 2006. Searching for new antimalarial therapeutics amongst known drugs. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 67:409-416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wishart, D. S., C. Knox, A. C. Guo, D. Cheng, S. Shrivastava, D. Tzur, B. Gautam, and M. Hassanali. 2008. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:D901-D906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang, J. H., T. D. Chung, and K. R. Oldenburg. 1999. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 4:67-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES