Abstract
Some naturally occurring flavonols, exemplified by quercetin, appear to possess experimental cancer chemopreventive efficacy. Modulation of p53 is a mechanism thought to contribute to their activity. The hypothesis was tested that a synthetic flavonol, 3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavonol (TMFol), can interfere with tumor development and p53 expression in two models of colorectal carcinogenesis, ApcMin mice and human-derived HCT116 adenocarcinoma-bearing nude mice. Mice received TMFol with their diet (0.2%) from weaning to week 16 in the case of ApcMin, or from either day 7 prior to (“TMFol early”) or day 7 after (“TMFol late”) tumor inoculation in HCT116 mice. The ability of TMFol to affect tumor proliferation or apoptosis, as reflected by staining for Ki-67 or cleaved caspase 3, respectively, was studied in HCT116 tumors. TMFol tumor levels were measured by HPLC. Consumption of TMFol reduced small intestinal adenoma burden in ApcMin mice by 47%, compared to control mice (P<0.002). The TMFol early regimen approximately halved HCT116 tumor size (P<0.05), decreased tumor proliferation and increased apoptosis, whilst the TMFol late regimen had no significant effect, when compared to controls. In tumor tissues from mice, in which TMFol reduced tumor development, p53 expression was increased, 3-fold in ApcMin and 1.5-fold in HCT116 tumor-bearing mice (P=0.02). TMFol increased p53 also in cells derived from these tumors. TMFol was detected in HCT116 tumors, but levels did not correlate to tumor burden. TMFol was not mutagenic in the Ames test. The results suggest that chemical modification of the flavonol structure may generate safe and efficacious cancer chemopreventive agents.
Keywords: Flavonols, chemoprevention, drug development
Introduction
Results of clinical trials of certain drugs, such as aspirin (1) and tamoxifen (2), provide proof of principle that cancer chemoprevention is a viable option to reduce cancer incidence. Nevertheless, the requirement of long-term intervention in cancer chemoprevention and concerns about the safety on long-term use of such drugs in relatively healthy humans (3,4) render the search for safe and efficacious agents highly suitable. Edible plants constitute an attractive source of novel potential cancer chemopreventive agents, as the safety record of dietary constituents tends to be good. Flavonoids, exemplified by the flavonols quercetin in onions and apples and epigallocatechin-3 gallate in tea and the isoflavone genistein in soya, are examples of phytochemicals with suspected cancer chemopreventive properties (5-7). Very little information exists as to molecular features which confer pharmacological activity on to the flavonoid scaffold. Such knowledge is required to help the rational discovery, or chemical design, of flavonoids with optimal cancer chemopreventive efficacy. Recent evidence suggests that the presence of methoxy moieties instead of, or in addition to, hydroxy in certain flavonoids augments cancer chemopreventive activity (8,9). Prominent among the many mechanisms via which flavonoids are thought to exert their chemopreventive activity is activation of wild-type p53 (10) and/or down-regulation of its mutant counterpart (11). The tumor suppressor protein p53 is involved in DNA damage repair, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through transcriptional regulation of genes implicated in these pathways and by direct interaction with other proteins (12,13). p53-inactivating mutations are present in more than 50% of all cancers, including colon cancer, leading to aggressive, treatment-resistant malignancies (14,15). Small molecules, such as CP-31398, a styrylquinazoline developed by Pfizer, have been designed to target p53 and to restore its growth suppressor function. CP-31398 reduced the growth of human colon tumor xenografts in nude mice (16) and potently compromised adenoma development in the ApcMin mouse, accompanied by a marked increase in adenomatous p53 levels (17). The ApcMin mouse is a model of colorectal carcinogenesis associated with an Apc mutation (18), and this model is frequently used in the preclinical identification of candidate colorectal cancer chemopreventive agents for clinical development.
Flavonols, such as quercetin (3′,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavonol), have been arguably the focus of more pharmacological investigations than most other flavonoids. Quercetin has shown cancer chemopreventive properties in rodent models of carcinogenesis of the colon, mouth, cervix and lung (5, 19-21), and it has been subjected to a phase 1 clinical trial in cancer patients (22). Its des-hydroxy cogener fisetin (3′,4′,7-trihydroxyflavonol, for structures see fig. 1) has recently been found to possess preclinical prostate cancer chemopreventive activity (23). However, a serious toxicological impediment of many flavonols, which militates against their development as cancer chemopreventive agents, is their mutagenicity as reflected by the Ames test. Quercetin at levels of typically 20μg or more per plate (24-26) and, to a lesser extent, fisetin at approximately 500μg per plate (27), were shown to be mutagenic. There is also limited evidence for the carcinogenicity of quercetin in animals (28,29). These toxicological properties of quercetin militate against its further clinical development. Toxicophoric structural features considered responsible for the mutagenic potential of flavonols include phenolic hydroxy moieties in both the A and B rings of the molecular scaffold (24,26,27).
Fig. 1.
Effect of quercetin (A), fisetin (B) or TMFol (C) on the growth of APC10.1 cells. Cells were counted after exposure to flavonols for 6 days. Values are the mean±SD of three independent experiments, each conducted in triplicate. Chemical structures and IC50 values for growth inhibition are inserted. IC50 values are significantly different from each other (P<0.001 by ANOVA).
Taking all these findings into consideration, we hypothesized that it might be possible to synthesize a flavonol with optimized pharmacological and toxicological properties. We surmised that a flavonol molecule devoid of hydroxy moieties in the A ring and bearing methoxy rather than hydroxy functionalities in the B ring may be non-mutagenic and possess cancer chemopreventive efficacy. In order to test this hypothesis we synthesized 3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavonol (TMFol) and explored its preclinical cancer chemopreventive properties. Initially we compared its ability to compromise the growth of APC10.1 cells with that of its two naturally occurring flavonol cogeners quercetin and fisetin. APC10.1 cells have been derived from adenomas of ApcMin mice (30). Potent inhibition of the growth of APC10.1 cells in vitro has recently been suggested to predict the ability of a compound to interfere with adenoma development in the ApcMin mouse in vivo (31). As TMFol exerted compelling APC10.1 cell growth–inhibitory activity, we investigated its effect on adenoma development in ApcMin mice in vivo. Efficacy of TMFol in vivo was corroborated in a second colorectal carcinogenesis model, nude mice bearing the human colon adenocarcinoma-derived HCT116 xenograft. As TMFol compromised tumor development in vivo, we explored whether its efficacy is accompanied by alteration of tumor p53 expression. We also measured TMFol levels in murine tumour tissue, to relate activity to presence of pharmacologically active agent. The potential mutagenicity of TMFol was investigated in the Ames reverse mutation assay using a panel of Salmonella Typhimurium strains, in which quercetin has shown mutagenic activity (24-27). Overall the work was designed to discover safe and efficacious cancer chemopreventive agents structurally based on pharmacologically interesting plant constituents.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
TMFol, synthesized as described previously (32), was >99% pure as determined by HPLC analysis. 2′,5′,5,6,7,8-Hexamethoxyflavone used as an internal standard in the HPLC analysis was supplied by the NCI Developmental Therapeutic Programme Open Compound Repository (NCI, Bethesda, USA). HPLC fluorescence grade methanol was purchased from Fisher Chemicals (Loughborough, UK), and water for analysis was generated in a Nano-Pure water purification system (Barnstead, UK). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Corp. (Poole, UK). Antibodies were purchased from Dako (Ely, UK) (versus p21 and p53, clone DO-7) or Cell Signaling Technology (Hitchin, UK) (versus p53, clone 1C12). Mouse and rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Sigma.
Cell growth experiments
APC10.1 cells, kindly provided by Dr C De Giovanni (Cancer Research Section, University of Bologna, Italy), were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Paisley, UK). HCT116 human colon adenocarcinoma cells were obtained from the American Type Cell Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and maintained in McCoy's 5A (Gibco) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.
APC10.1 or HCT116 cells from subculture 2-20 were seeded at a density of 2×103 onto 24-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. TMFol, quercetin or fisetin dissolved in DMSO were added to cellular suspensions to yield final concentrations of 0.1-5,1-40 or 0.2-8μM, respectively. Cells were incubated for up to 6 days; control cells were incubated with vehicle only. The amount of DMSO added (0.1% final concentration) on its own did not interfere with cell growth. Cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), harvested by trypsinization and resuspended in cell culture medium (1ml), which was diluted 10-fold with Isoton II buffer (Beckman Coulter, High Wycombe, UK). An aliquot (0.5ml) of the cell suspension was counted using a Z2 Coulter Particle Counter with Size Analyzer (Beckman Coulter). Growth curve experiments were conducted in triplicate, and IC50 values were calculated from a plot of cell number on day 6 (percentage of vehicle control) versus agent concentration, using the linear phase of the curve.
Animals and TMFol dose
Breeding colonies were established using C57BL/6J Min/+ (ApcMin) mice originally obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Ear tissue from newborn mice was genotyped for the presence of the mutation, using PCR as described previously (33). Female MF-1 outbred nude mice (30–40g) were obtained from Harlan UK (Bicester, Oxon, UK) and ear-punched for identification. Mice were kept in the Leicester University Biomedical Services facility at 20–23°C under conditions of 40–60% relative humidity and a 12h light/dark cycle. Experiments were carried out under animal project license PPL 80/2167, granted to Leicester University by the UK Home Office. The experimental design was vetted by the Leicester University Local Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation and met the standards required by the UKCCCR guidelines (34). Mice received standard AIN93G diet (controls) or AIN93G diet supplemented with TMFol at 0.2%. For justification of the dose see Discussion. Similar dietary doses have been commonly used in preclinical chemoprevention studies of other polyphenols including curcumin, resveratrol and anthocyanins.
Intervention in ApcMin mice
ApcMin mice (n=19-21 per group with equal numbers of males and females) received diet or diet supplemented with TMFol from week 4 to the end of their life (week 16). Animals were killed in week 16 by cardiac exsanguination under halothane anesthesia. The intestinal tract was removed and flushed with PBS. Intestinal tissue was cut open longitudinally, and multiplicity, location and size of adenomas in the small and large intestine were recorded using a magnifying glass (×5). Polyp diameter was measured using digital calipers. Consistent with their histological appearance, a hemispherical shape was assumed for small bowel polyps (volume=2/3Πr3, with r=radius), and a spherical shape for colon polyps (volume=4/3Πr3). Tumor burden is defined as total polyp volume per animal, as described before (35).
Intervention in HCT-116 tumor-bearing nude mice
HCT116 cells (106) suspended in matrigel:serum free medium (1:1; 100μL; Becton Dickinson, Worthing, UK) were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of nude mice of 8 weeks of age under light halothane anesthesia. Mice (n=14-15 per group with equal numbers of males and females) received TMFol commencing either seven days prior to, or seven days post, cell inoculation. Mice were weighed weekly, and tumor size was measured three times per week using callipers. Tumor volume was calculated by the formula: length × width2/2, where length is the larger and width the smaller diameter of the tumor (in mm) (36). Animals were culled three weeks after tumor cell inoculation, when tumors in untreated mice reached the maximal size (17mm in length) permissible under UK animal welfare stipulations. Tumor tissue samples were snap-frozen (liquid nitrogen) and stored at −80°C until analysis by Western blotting or HPLC, or fixed in 10% formalin and histologically processed until analysis by immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed HCT116 tumor tissue was stained for Ki-67 using a rabbit polyclonal Ki-67p antibody from Novocastra (Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd, Newcastle UK) or for cleaved caspase-3 using cleaved caspase-3 Asp 175 polyclonal antibody from Cell Signaling Technology. Briefly, paraffin-embedded sections (4μm) mounted on polysine-coated slides were dewaxed (65°C, 20min) and hydrated through a graded series of alcohol rinses. Antigen was unmasked by microwaving sections (20min) in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9). Endogenous peroxidase activity was inactivated by incubation of slides with hydrogen peroxide (3%, 10min); nonspecific binding was blocked with protein blocking solution (Novocastra). Sections were incubated with primary antibody (dilution 1:2000 for Ki67, 1:200 for caspase 3) overnight at 4°C. After washing sections (PBS), the tissue-antibody reaction was visualized using a commercial kit (NovoLink, Novocastra). All slides were scored by two independent observers blinded to the treatment group. Proliferative and apoptotic indices were quantitated as the percentage of epithelial cells from 10 random fields of view per section which stained positive for Ki-67 or cleaved caspase 3, respectively. Representative fields were selected and the total number of epithelial cells and the number of positively staining epithelial cells were counted (magnification ×40; Leitz Orthoplan microscope, Leica DC 300 camera) for each sample. Differences in counts between the observers were less than 10%, and both noted the same differences between cohorts. Acquisition software was Adobe Photoshop version 7. Total numbers of epithelial cells counted on each slide were 2312±307 and 2340±154 (mean±SD, n=15) for Ki-67 and cleaved caspase 3 staining, respectively.
Western blot analysis
Tumor tissue from control mice or mice which received TMFol was homogenized with lysis buffer (1:4, w:v. PBS, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, with protease inhibitors PMSF 1mM, aprotinin 2μg/ml, leupeptin 5μg/ml and phosphatase inhibitors sodium vanadate 1mM and sodium fluoride 1mM). The homogenate was placed on ice (15min) and centrifuged (20min, 10,000×g, 4°C). Cells were grown to 60–80% confluency, followed by exposure for 72h to TMFol. Cells were centrifuged (5min, 10,000×g, 4°C), and the cell pellet was suspended in lysis buffer. Protein concentration in tissue or cell lysate was determined using the Biorad protein assay (Biorad, Hemel Hempstead, UK) with bovine serum albumin as standard. An aliquot of protein lysate (50μg) was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred for 1h onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, NH, USA). Blots were blocked for 2h with 5% skimmed milk in PBS/Tween 0.05% (PBS-T), and probed with a specific primary antiserum in PBS containing 0.05% PBS-T and 5% non-fat dry milk (4°C, overnight). After washing (PBS-T), blots were treated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1h and washed (5× for 5min) in PBS-T. Proteins were detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Geneflow, Staffordshire, UK).
Assays for p21 and Bax luciferase activity and p21 real time PCR
HCT116 were seeded in triplicate (30000/well, 12-well plate). A day later 400ng of reporter plasmid pGL2 (Promega Italia SRL, Milan, Italy) containing the firefly luciferase sequence under the control of the promoters for Bax (Bax-Luc) or p21 (p21-Luc) were transfected into cells using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Pero, Italy). An aliquot (50ng) of Renilla luciferase expression vector (pRL-CMV, Promega) was co-transfected with the above plasmids to normalize for transfection efficiency. After 6h, medium was replaced and cells were exposed to TMFol (0-10μM) for 72h. Luciferase activity was measured with a Veritas microtiter plate luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA) and a Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and normalized to Renilla expression activity. Activity is expressed as fold increase compared to vehicle control.
Total RNA was isolated from HCT116 cells using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega). The reverse transcription reaction was performed with 1μg of total RNA. RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA, using a high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Monza, Italy), and amplified with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and two real time oligonucleotide primers derived from published p21 or GAPDH primer sequences. Real time PCR was performed on a 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Fold amplification was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method, as specified by the manufacturer.
HPLC analysis
Tissue sample preparation and HPLC analysis using fluorescence detection were as described before (32) using a Varian Prostar HPLC system (Varian, UK) consisting of a Varian ProStar 230 solvent delivery system, a Pro-Star 363 fluorescence detector, and a 410 Varian autosampler. Separation was achieved on a Gemini C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 3 μm, Phenomenex, UK) at a flow rate of 0.75 mL/min, using an isocratic mobile phase of 69% methanol in 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.1). TMFol in tumor tissue from MF1 nude mice was quantified using 2′,5′,5,6,7,8-hexamethoxyflavone as an internal standard.
Reverse mutation assay
The Ames test was conducted at a facility operating to GLP conditions by Safepharm Laboratories (Shardlow, Derbyshire, UK). Samonella strains TA100, 102 and 98, obtained from the University of California at Berkeley, were exposed to TMFol dissolved in DMSO using the Ames plate incorporation method at 5 dose levels, both with and without a rat liver homogenate metabolism system (10% liver S9 with standard co-factors). The dose range for the experiment (50-5000μg/plate) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay. Aliquots (0.1ml) of bacterial culture were dispensed into test tubes followed by molten trace histidine-supplemented top agar (2ml), solutions (0.1ml) of TMFol, vehicle only or positive control mutagen and either S9 mix or phosphate buffer (0.5ml). The tube content was mixed and distributed onto the surface of agar plates. The assay was conducted in triplicate for each strain and each concentration of TMFol or control mutagen.
Statistical analyses
Values shown in the results are the mean±SD. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 programme (Windows XP). Effects of TMFol on adenoma number and burden were compared by Students t-test. Effects of TMFol on cell growth in vitro and xenograft tumor volume in vivo were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Bonferroni correction. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Effect of flavonols on tumor cell growth in vitro
APC10.1 cells were exposed to quercetin, fisetin or TMFol, and IC50 values were computed from the growth curves (Fig. 1). Of the three flavonols, TMFol was the most potent cell growth inhibitor, with an IC50 of about a tenth of that for quercetin and a fourth of that for fisetin. TMFol also inhibited the growth of human-derived HCT116 adenocarcinoma cells, characterized by an IC50 of 3.3±1.0 μM (mean±SD, n=3). In contrast, at the highest concentration tested (10μM), quercetin and fisetin reduced HCT116 cell growth only by less than 6 and 8%, respectively, so that the IC50 values for growth inhibition were above 10μM for both flavonols. In the light of the growth-inhibitory potency of TMFol in intestinal cells in vitro, its ability to compromise tumor development in the ApcMin or HCT116 xenograft mouse models in vivo was considered worthy of investigation.
Effect of TMFol on adenoma development in ApcMin mice
ApcMin mice received TMFol at 0.2% with their diet. Tumor development was reflected by burden and number of adenomas observed in the mice at the end of the experiment in week 16. Consumption of TMFol almost halved adenoma burden in the small intestine, albeit failing to affect adenoma burden in the colon (Fig. 2A). Total adenoma number was not significantly reduced by TMFol, however when the proximal subsection of the small intestine was considered separately, TMFol decreased both adenoma number and burden (Fig. 2B). In contrast, there was no significant effect on the middle or distal small intestine. The body weight of the ApcMin mice which received TMFol for their lifetime was indistinguishable from that of mice on the control diet (result not shown). Inspection of lung, liver and kidney tissues failed to reveal significant pathological abnormalities. Both observations tentatively intimate lack of toxicity of TMFol.
Fig. 2.
Effect of consumption of TMFol on burden (top) and number (bottom) of adenomas in the total small intestine or colon (A) and in small intestinal subsections (B) of ApcMin mice. Mice received AIN93 diet (control) or AIN93 diet which contained TMFol (0.2 %) from weaning (week 4) until week 16, when they were killed, and adenoma number and burden were measured. Values are the mean±SD of n=19 (control) or 21 mice (TMFol). Statistical comparison was by Students t-test; P values above bars indicate significant differences between mice on TMFol and controls.
Effect of TMFol on HCT116 tumor growth in MF1 mice
Nude MF1 mice bearing HCT116 adenocarcinoma cells received TMFol at 0.2% with their diet. Tumor size was measured by calliper at 2-3 day intervals. Consumption of TMFol from a week prior to tumor inoculation (“TMFol early”) halved tumor size beyond day 16 post-inoculation (Fig. 3A). Dietary intervention with TMFol commencing a week post tumor inoculation (“TMFol late”) had only a small, but not significant, tumor growth-inhibitory effect. Tumor tissue was investigated immunohistochemically for the proportion of proliferating or apoptotic cells, reflected by staining for Ki-67 or cleaved caspase 3, respectively. Ki-67 is a granular component of the nucleolus expressed exclusively in proliferating cells and used as a prognostic marker in human neoplasias. Consistent with in vivo tumor growth-inhibitory efficacy, TMFol significantly reduced cell proliferation in HCT116 tumors from mice on the TMFol early regimen, with a proliferation index of 72%, when compared to tumors in control mice, with a proliferation index of 86% (Fig. 3B). Proliferation was not reduced in tumors from mice on the TMFol late regimen. Tumor levels of apoptotic cells were elevated by 55% compared to control animals in tumors from mice on the TMFol early regimen, whilst there was no increase in apoptosis in tumors from mice on the TMFol late regimen (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
Effect of consumption of TMFol on growth of the HCT116 adenocarcinoma xenograft in nude MF1 mice (A), and on proliferation and apoptosis in HCT116 tumor tissue as reflected by staining for Ki-67 (B) and cleaved caspase 3 (C). Mice received either control diet (rhombi in A, “control” in B, C) or diet with TMFol (0.2%) from either a week prior to (squares in A, “TMFol early” in B, C), or a week post tumor inoculation (triangles in A, “TMFol late” in B, C). Tumor volume in A was measured by calliper (see Materials and Methods). B and C show photomicrographs of tumor tissue stained dark brown for KI-67 (B) or cleaved caspase 3 (C), columns reflect densitometry readings. Note that in B ordinate commences at 60%. Bars in the photomicrographs (B,C) are 50μm. Values are the mean±SD of n=14 (TMFol late) or 15 mice (control and TMFol early) in A and of 8-10 per group in B and C. Asterisks in A indicate that tumor volume in the TMFol early group (squares) was significantly smaller than that in control mice (P values: 0.036, 0.049 and 0.007 for days 16, 19 and 21, respectively), P values above bars denote statistical difference in B and C. Statistical analysis was by one-way ANOVA with posthoc Bonferoni correction.
Effect of TMFol on p53 expression in tumors
In adenomas from ApcMin mice, which had consumed TMFol, tissue expression of p53 was about three times the level observed in control mice (Fig. 4A). Similarly, p53 expression in tumor tissue from HCT116 tumor-bearing mice on the TMFol early regimen was increased by 50% over expression in controls (Fig. 4B). In contrast, p53 expression was not significantly increased over controls in tumors from mice on the TMFol late regimen. Expression of p53 was also up-regulated in APC10.1 and HCT116 tumor cells in vitro, when exposed for 72h to TMFol at 5 or 10μM, respectively, compared to cells in control incubations (Fig. 4C,D). In preliminary experiments, HCT116 cells exposed to TMFol showed biochemical changes fully consistent with p53 upregulation. TMFol at 10μM significantly increased expression of the p21 gene, by a factor of 3.2±1.2, as measured by real time PCR analysis, and of the p21 protein, determined by Western analysis, by a factor of 3.0±0.6, as compared to controls (p<0.01 for both). Furthermore, in HCT116 cells transfected with suitable luciferase constructs, TMFol elevated the expression of the p53 target proteins p21 and Bax in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4.
p53 Protein expression in adenomas of ApcMin mice (A) or in HCT116 tumor xenografts from nude MF1 mice (B) which received TMFol (0.2%) with their diet, and in APC10.1 (C) or HCT116 cells (D) which were exposed to TMFol at the indicated concentrations for 72h before harvest. Tumour tissue was obtained from the ApcMin (A) or HCT116 xenograft mice (B) described in Figs 2 and 3. Analysis was by Western blotting. Bars reflect densitometric evaluation of bands, and values are the mean±SD of 6 (control) and 12 (TMFol) (A) or 14-15 mice (B), and of 3 (C) or 4 (D) independent cell exposure experiments, each conducted in triplicate. Asterisk with appropriate P values indicate that the difference between intervention and control was significant, analyses were by Students t-test (A) or by one-way ANOVA with posthoc Bonferoni correction (B,C,D).
Fig. 5.
Effect of TMFol on luciferase reporter activity of p21-Luc (A) and Bax-Luc (B) constructs in HCT116 cells, into which suitable firefly luciferase sequences had been transfected. Values are the mean±SD of 3 independent experiments, asterisk indicates that values were significantly different from controls (P<0.01). For details of cells and transfections see Materials and Methods.
Analysis of TMFol levels in tumor tissue
We wished to relate the ability of TMFol to retard HCT116 tumor development in nude mice with agent levels achieved in the target tissue. Tumor tissue was obtained at the end of the efficacy experiment described in Fig. 3 and subjected to HPLC analysis (Fig. 6). Levels of TMFol in the tumor were 146±80pmoles/g tissue (mean±SD, n=6 mice), 146nM in molar concentration terms. When TMFol levels in individual mice were compared with tumor burden, a correlation between the two parameters was not observed.
Fig. 6.
Representative HPLC chromatograms of extracts of HCT116 tumor xenograft tissue from mice on AIN93G diet without (A) or spiked with TMFol (500ng/ml) (B), or from mice which received AIN93G diet fortified with TMFol (0.2%) for their lifetime (C). For chromatographic conditions see Materials and Methods. is=internal standard, which was 2′,5′,5,6,7,8-hexamethoxyflavone.
Lack of mutagenicity of TMFol in the Ames test
TMFol was subjected to the Ames reverse mutation assay in order to establish its mutagenic potential in vitro. Salmonella strains TA100, 102 and 98 were tested, the two former indicating base-pair substitution mutations and the latter frameshift mutations. TMFol at concentrations of up to 5mg/plate failed to cause any visible increase in the frequency of revertant colonies either in the presence or absence of rat hepatic metabolic activating enzymes in any of the bacterial incubations (Table 1). In contrast, suitable model mutagens, both direct acting genotoxicants and chemicals requiring metabolic activation, caused expected revertant colony increases. These results demonstrate that TMFol at the concentrations employed is not mutagenic in this system.
Table 1.
Effect of TMFol in the reverse mutation assay using Salmonella Typhimurium
| TMFol concentration (μg/plate) |
Number of revertants per plate without or with S9 (in brackets) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| S Typhimurium strain | |||
| TA100 | TA102 | TA98 | |
|
|
|||
| 0 | 124±5 (129±3) |
232±19 (271±8) |
12±1 (24±6) |
| 50 | 119±9 (112±5) |
226±17 (267±9) |
11±4 (19±6) |
| 150 | 122±1 (113±10) |
217±13 (270±4) |
15±3 (20±6) |
| 500 | 111±11 (112±5) |
216±15 (258±15) |
14±1 (23±8) |
| 1500 | 115±14 (104±5) |
208±11 (270±8) |
13±2 (20±4) |
| 5000 | 118±34 (102±16) |
231±23 (271±10) |
11±2 (21±6) |
| Positive controls (μg/plate): | |||
|
N-Ethyl-N′-nitro-N- nitroso-guanidine (3) |
413±58 | ||
| 2-Aminoanthracene (1) | (1039±964) | ||
| Mitomycin C (0.5) | 1147±10 | ||
| 1,8-Dihydroxy- anthraquinone (10) |
(1607±75) | ||
| 4-Nitroquinoline-1- oxide (0.2) |
222±20 | ||
| Benzo(a)pyrene (5) | (263±52) | ||
Discussion
The results described above provide proof of principle that judicious structural modification of the quercetin molecular scaffold can generate compounds which lack mutagenic activity in vitro and interfere with colorectal carcinogenesis in mice in vivo. Whilst quercetin has shown chemopreventive properties in some preclinical models of oral, cervical, lung and colon carcinogenesis (5, 19-21), it was devoid of the ability to prevent adenoma development in the ApcMin mouse (37). Quercetin at dietary concentrations of 0.3-3% has even been demonstrated to augment, rather than counteract, azoxymethane-induced formation of colonic aberrant crypts and adenocarcinomas in rodents (38,39). Furthermore, the mutagenicity of quercetin (24-27) and limited evidence for its carcinogenicity (28,29) render its further development as a cancer chemopreventive agent unlikely. Fisetin, which is less mutagenic than quercetin in the Ames test (27), has not yet been investigated for adenoma development-retarding ability in the ApcMin mouse, even though it has shown promise as a putative prostate cancer chemopreventive agent (23). The synthesis of TMFol, the flavonol described here, was guided by a two-fold rationale: to design mutagenicity out of the flavonol scaffold and to impart colorectal cancer chemopreventive properties onto the molecule. The latter expectation was based on the observation that in flavones, which are structurally closely related to flavonols, inclusion of methoxy moieties in the molecule led to the acquisition of superior cancer chemopreventive properties, when compared to the hydroxy-containing counterpart molecules. The benefit for cancer chemopreventive activity of presence of methoxy functionalities is illustrated by, for example, 5,7-dimethoxyflavone and 5,7,4′-trimethoxyflavone, which were superior to their hydroxy congeners in terms of not only systemic availability in rats but also ability to inhibit oral cancer cell proliferation in vitro (8). Moreover, 3′,4′,5′,5,7-pentamethoxyflavone (PMF) and tricin (4′,5,7-trihydroxy- 3′,5′-dimethoxyflavone) reduced adenoma development in ApcMin mouse in vivo, whilst apigenin (4′,5,7-trihydroxyflavone) did not (9). PMF and tricin also inhibited adenoma cell growth in vitro much more potently than apigenin (9). These findings imply an intrinsic advantage of methoxylated flavones over hydroxylated ones in terms of growth-inhibitory properties.
Consistent with a chemoprevention-enhancing role of methoxy moieties in flavonoids, TMFol was shown here to interfere with tumorigenesis in two mouse models and to engage anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic mechanisms in vivo. The dietary dose chosen for the study described here equates to approximately 240mg/kg per day. When extrapolated from mice to humans on the basis of body surface area comparison (40), this dose is 720mg/m2, thus 1.4g per 80kg human per day, a substantial but perhaps feasible dose. Intriguingly, in the ApcMin model the adenoma development-reducing effect of TMFol was confined to the proximal intestine. This tissue specificity could arguably be the consequence of differences in levels of TMFol between intestinal sections, with TMFol concentrations inadequate for activity in the intestine beyond the proximal section. We have reported previously that the concentration of TMFol in the gastrointestinal mucosa of C57BL6/J mice, the ApcMin background strain, which received TMFol for a week at the same dietary dose as that used in the ApcMin mice described here, was 220±68nmoles/g tissue, 220μM in concentration terms (32). This value is 169-fold the IC50 for growth inhibition by TMFol in APC10.1 cells, as described here. TMFol levels in the intestinal mucosa of ApcMin mice were not studied in the present study, but one can assume that they were very similar to those observed in C57Bl6/J mice. It needs to be pointed out in this context, that results obtained in the ApcMin mouse, when serving as a model of human colorectal carcinogenesis, need to be interpreted with caution, as the model has some shortcomings, especially the facts that tumor development occurs mainly in the small intestine, not in the colon, as in humans, and that adenomas tend not to progress to the stage of carcinomas before animals are moribund. The large difference in TMFol levels between HCT116 xenograft tumor and murine gut mucosa reflects agent accessing tissues via the circulation in the former and mainly unabsorbed TMFol in the latter tissue. TMFol levels in the xenograft tumor were only a fifteenth of the IC50 for TMFol-mediated growth inhibition in HCT116 cells in vitro, suggesting that HCT116 tumor cells in the intact animal environment in vivo are considerably more sensitive to the antiproliferative action of TMFol than HCT116 cells under cell culture conditions.
The results presented above demonstrate that TMFol consumption upregulated wild-type p53 expression in tumor target tissues in both murine models, a mechanism which may well contribute to the observed chemopreventive efficacy of TMFol. Accompanying preliminary results in HCT116 cells in vitro intimate that p53 upregulation by TMFol has functional consequences as adjudged by induction of downstream promotors. The study of CP-31398 (17) referred to in the introduction provides convincing support for the notion that increasing expression and activation of wild-type p53 reduces intestinal adenoma development in the ApcMin mouse, probably via suppression of adenoma cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis. The p53-modulating ability of flavonoids in cells in vitro has been described before (10,11,41-44), although flavonoid-mediated upregulation of p53 in intact animals has to our knowledge been shown previously only for the flavone apigenin (4′,5,7-trihydroxyflavone) in mice bearing the 22Rv1 prostate tumor xenograft (43). TMFol at 10μM doubled p53 protein expression in HCT116 cells in vitro, and fisetin has been reported to have a similar effect (42). In contrast, quercetin at up to 40μM failed to affect p53 expression in this cell type (44), although it increased p53 phosphorylation status. In the light of the order of growth-inhibitory potency of the three flavonols in APC1.10 cells in vitro shown here (TMFol>fisetin>quercetin), and the fact that quercetin was devoid of activity in the ApcMin mouse, these differences in p53 modulatory potency tentatively hint at a mechanistic link between upregulation of p53 and cancer chemopreventive activity in mice. The mechanisms by which TMFol increased p53 expression in the ApcMin and HCT116 xenograft models as described here, remain to be elucidated. On the basis of the literature pertaining to the p53-modulating effects of CP-31398 (cited in reference 17), these mechanisms are likely to be complex and model-dependent. It is worth emphasising that TMFol is likely to engage anti-carcinogenic mechanisms other than p53 modulation, and these mechanisms need to be identified in future studies.
The mutagenic activity of flavonols has been associated with hydroxy moieties in rings A and B of the molecular scaffold (24,25), and their methylation decreased mutagenic activity (24,27). Consistent with these toxicophoric structural features, TMFol, which bears no hydroxy moieties in ring A and three methoxys in ring B, was shown here to be devoid of mutagenic properties in the Ames test. Furthermore, the observed absence of detrimental effects of TMFol on murine body weight or organ pathology augurs well for its safety profile. Nevertheless, the putative safety of TMFol needs to be elucidated carefully in further preclinical experiments.
In summary, the properties of TMFol described here support the notion that chemical modification of the flavonol structure based on existing, albeit scarce, information on the relationship between flavonoid structure and chemopreventive activity or toxicity may generate useful cancer chemopreventive agents. It is conceivable that, with further acquisition of knowledge of the important molecular targets of flavonoids and their structure-activity relationships, the flavonol structure can be optimized even more, beyond TMFol. Nevertheless, in the light of its favorable pharmacological profile described here, TMFol deserves additional preclinical investigation to help adjudge whether it is worthy of advancement to the stage of clinical development. TMFol should be studied for chemopreventive efficacy in other rodent carcinogenesis models. Furthermore combinations of TMFol together with agents, such as cyclooxygenase inhibitors, which engage complimentary chemoprevention mechanisms, should be investigated.
Acknowlegements
Grant support: The study was funded by programme grant C325/A6691 from Cancer Research UK and a Welcome Trust Vacation Studentship.
We thank Drs C De Giovanni (Dept Experimental Pathol, University of Bologna) and L Landuzzi (Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institutes, Bologna, Italy) for provision of APC10.1 cells, and Abigail Choong for help with experiments.
Grant support: The study was funded by programme grant C325-A6894 from Cancer Research UK and a UK Wellcome Trust Vacation Scholarship
Footnotes
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
- 1.Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Heath CW. Aspirin use and reduced risk of fatal colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1593–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112053252301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371–88. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dube C, Rostom A, Lewin G, et al. The use of aspirin for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: A systematic review prepared for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:365–75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fisher B, Costantino JP, Redmond CK, et al. Endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated breast-cancer patients: Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-14. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:527–37. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.7.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Deschner ES, Ruperto J, Wong G, Newmark HL. Quercetin and rutin as inhibitors of azoxymethanol-induced colonic neoplasia. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:1193–6. doi: 10.1093/carcin/12.7.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gupta S, Hastak K, Ahmad N, Lewin JS, Mukhtar H. Inhibition of prostate carcinogenesis in TRAMP mice by oral infusion of green tea polyphenols. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10350–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.171326098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lamartiniere CA, Moore JB, Brown NM, et al. Genistein suppresses mammary cancer in rats. Carcinogenesis. 1995;16:2833–40. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.11.2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Walle T, Ta N, Kawamori T, et al. Cancer chemopreventive properties of orally bioavailable flavonoids - methylated versus unmethylated flavones. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:1288–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cai H, Sale S, Schmid R, et al. Flavones as colorectal cancer chemopreventive agents – phenol-O-methylation enhances efficacy. Cancer Prev Res. 2009;2:743–50. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Plaumann B, Fritsche M, Rimpler H, et al. Flavonoids activate wild-type p53. Oncogene. 1996;13:1605–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Avila MA, Velasco JC, Cansado J, Notario V. Quercetin mediates the down regulation of mutant p53 in the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB468. Cancer Res. 1994;54:2424–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bullock AN, Fersht AR. Rescuing the function of mutant p53. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:68–76. doi: 10.1038/35094077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vousden K. P53 death star. Cell. 2000;103:601–4. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00171-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kopelovitch I, DeLeo AB. Elevated levels of p53 antigen in cultured skin fibroblasts from patients with hereditary adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum and its relevance to oncogenic mechanisms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;77:1241–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat Med. 2004;10:789–99. doi: 10.1038/nm1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang W, Kim SH, El-Deiry WS. Small molecule modulators of p53 family signaling and anti-tumor effects in p53-deficient human colon tumor xenografts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:11003–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604507103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rao CV, Swamy MV, Patlolla JMR, Kopelovich L. Suppression of familial adenomatous polyposis by CP-31398, a TP53 modulator, in APCmin/+ mice. Cancer Res. 2008;68:7670–5. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Su LK, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, et al. Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science. 1992;256:668–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1350108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Makita H, Tanaka T, Fujitsuka H, et al. Chemoprevention of 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide-induced rat oral carcinogenesis by the dietary flavonoids chalcone, 2-hydroxychalcone, and quercetin. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4904–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.De S, Chakraborty J, Chakraborty RN, Das S. Chemopreventive activity of quercetin during carcinogenesis in cervix uteri in mice. Phytotherapy Res. 2000;14:347–51. doi: 10.1002/1099-1573(200008)14:5<347::aid-ptr613>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khanduja KL, Gandhi RK, Pathania V, Syal N. Prevention of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced lung tumorigenesis by ellagic acid and quercetin in mice. Food Chem Tox. 1999;37:313–8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ferry DR, Smith A, Malkhandi J, et al. Phase 1 clinical trial of the flavonoid quercetin: pharmacokinetics and evidence for in vivo tyrosine kinase inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 1996;2:659–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khan N, Asim M, Afaq F, et al. A novel dietary flavonoid fisetin inhibits androgen receptor signaling and tumor growth in athymic nude mice. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8555–63. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Czeczot H, Tudek B, Kusztelak J, et al. Isolation and studies of the mutagenic activity in the Ames test of flavonoids naturally occurring in medical herbs. Mutat Res. 1990;240:209–16. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90060-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mc Gregor JT, Jurd L. Mutagenicity of plant flavonoids: structural requirements for mutagenic activity in Salmonella typhimurium. Mutat Res. 1978;54:297–309. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(78)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jurado J, Alejandre-Duran E, Alonso-Moraga A, Pueyo C. Study on the mutagenic activity of 13 bioflavonoids with the Salmonella Ara test. Mutagenesis. 1991;6:289–95. doi: 10.1093/mutage/6.4.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rietjens IMCM, Boersma MG, Van der Woude H, et al. Flavonoids and alkenylbenzenes: Mechanisms of mutagenic action and carcinogenic risk. Mutat Res. 2005;574:124–38. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans 31. Some food additives, feed additives and naturally occurring substances. Lyon. 1983:213–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans 73. Some chemicals that cause tumours of the kidney or urinary bladder in rodents and some other substances. Lyon. 1999:497–515. [Google Scholar]
- 30.De Giovanni C, Landuzzi L, Nicoletti G, et al. Apc10.1: an ApcMin/+ intestinal cell line with retention of heterozygosity. Int J Cancer. 2004;109:200–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sale S, Fong I, De Giovanni C, et al. APC10.1 cells as a model for assessing the efficacy of potential chemopreventive agents in the ApcMin mouse model in vivo. Eur J Cancer. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.004. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Britton R, Fong I, Saad S, et al. Synthesis of the novel flavonoid 3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavonol and its determination in plasma and tissues of mice by HPLC with fluorescence detection. J Chromatog B. 2009;877:939–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Perkins S, Verschoyle RD, Hill K, et al. Chemopreventive efficacy and pharmacokinetics of curcumin in the Min/+ mouse, a model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:535–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Workman P, Twentyman P, Balkwill F, et al. United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) guidelines for the welfare of animals in experimental neoplasia (second edition) Brit J Cancer. 1998;77:1–10. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goodlad RA, Ryan AJ, Wedge SR, et al. Inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 signaling reduces tumor burden in the Apc(Min/+) mouse model of early intestinal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:2133–9. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tomayko MM, Reynolds CP. Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989;24:148–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00300234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mahmoud NN, Carothers AM, Grunberger D, et al. Plant phenolics decrease intestinal tumors in an animal model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:921–7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.5.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang K, Lamprecht SA, Liu Y, et al. Chemoprevention studies of the flavonoids quercetin and rutin in normal and azoxymethane-treated mouse colon. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1655–60. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.9.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pereira MA, Grubbs CJ, Barnes LH, et al. Effects of the phytochemicals, curcumin and quercetin, upon azoxymethane-induced colon cancer and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary cancer in rats. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:1305–11. doi: 10.1093/carcin/17.6.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Freireich EJ, Gehan EA, Rall DP, Schmidt LH, Skipper HE. Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey, and man. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:219–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tanigawa S, Fujii M, Hou DX. Stabilization of p53 is involved in quercetin-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HepG2 cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;73:797–804. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lim DY, Park JHY. Induction of p53 contributes to apoptosis of HCT-116 human colon cancer cells induced by the dietary compound fisetin. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296:G1060–G8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90490.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shukla S, Gupta S. Molecular targets for apigenin-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in prostate cancer cell xenograft. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:843–52. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lim JH, Park JW, Min DS, et al. NAG-1 up-regulation mediated by EGR-1 and p53 is critical for quercetin-induced apoptosis in HCT116 colon carcinoma cells. Apoptosis. 2007;12:411–21. doi: 10.1007/s10495-006-0576-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






