Abstract
Most photosynthesis-related genes in mature chloroplasts are transcribed by a eubacterial-type RNA polymerase (PEP) whose core subunits are encoded by the plastid genome. It has been shown previously that six putative nuclear genes (SIG1 to SIG6) encode promoter-specificity factors for PEP in Arabidopsis thaliana, and we isolated a T-DNA insertion line of SIG2 (sig2-1 mutant) that manifests aberrant chloroplast development. With the use of S1 nuclease protection and primer extension analyses, we have now characterized the SIG2-dependent chloroplast promoters in A.thaliana. The amounts of transcripts derived from one of the multiple psbD promoters (psbD –256) and from the promoters of two tRNA genes (trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC) were markedly and specifically decreased in the sig2-1 mutant. The abundance of these transcripts was restored to wild-type levels by introduction into the mutant of a SIG2 transgene. The recombinant SIG2 protein mixed with Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase could bind to a DNA fragment that contains the SIG2-dependent psbD –256, trnE-UUC or trnV-UAC promoter. Sequences similar to those of the –35 and –10 promoter elements of E.coli were identified in the regions of the SIG2-dependent chloroplast genes upstream of the transcription initiation sites.
INTRODUCTION
Chloroplasts are semiautonomous, photosynthetic organelles with their own genome. The genetic system operative in chloroplasts is similar to that of eubacteria, especially that of cyanobacteria, supporting the notion that extant chloroplasts of plant cells originated from a symbiotic event involving ancient oxygen-generating photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria). The chloroplast genome in most higher plants comprises a double-stranded, circular DNA molecule with a size of ∼150 kb. To date, approximately 120 genes of the chloroplast genome have been identified as encoding four rRNAs, 30 tRNAs and about 80 proteins, all of which are required for transcription, translation and chloroplast functions such as photosynthesis (1).
Chloroplast genes of higher plants are transcribed by at least two types of plastid RNA polymerase (2,3): one is a nucleus-encoded plastid RNA polymerase (NEP), a T3-T7 bacteriophage-type, single-subunit enzyme (4,5) that predominantly mediates the transcription of housekeeping genes such as those for components of the gene expression machinery (6); the other is a plastid-encoded plastid RNA polymerase (PEP), which is a eubacterial-type, multi-subunit enzyme. Photosynthesis-related genes, such as psbA, psbD and rbcL, which encode D1 and D2 subunits of the photosystem II complex and the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase, respectively, are transcribed by PEP (7,8).
Although the genes for core subunits of PEP (rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1 and rpoC2) are located in the plastid genome, the promoter-specificity (sigma) factors of this enzyme appear to be encoded by nuclear genes (9). The first description of a nuclear gene encoding a chloroplast RNA polymerase sigma factor in red algae (10,11), was followed by the identification of several nuclear genes encoding putative PEP sigma factors in higher plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana (12–14), Nicotiana tabacum (15) and Oryza sativa (16). To date, six genes encoding putative PEP sigma factors (SIG1 to SIG6) have been identified and characterized in A.thaliana (12–14, 17,18). A T-DNA insertion line of SIG2 (sig2-1) exhibits a pale-green leaf phenotype presumably due to impaired chloroplast development (19) (Fig. 1). Northern blot analysis did not reveal any overall reduction in the abundance of mRNAs derived from photosynthesis-related genes in this mutant. The amounts of some of the proteins encoded by these genes, however, were markedly reduced. Further analysis indicated that the abundance of a specific class of chloroplast tRNAs is reduced in the sig2-1 mutant. It was thus concluded that this defect in tRNA expression is responsible for the impaired chloroplast development and function in this mutant (18).
Figure 1.
Pale-green phenotype of the sig2-1 mutant of A.thaliana during seedling growth. The wild-type (Wassilewskija, WT), sig2-1 mutant (MT), and sig2-1 mutant complemented with the entire genomic region of SIG2 (gB) were grown under continuous light at 23°C either for 1 week on an MS-Gelrite plate (A) or for 3 weeks on Jiffy 7 (B).
To identify the promoter elements recognized by the PEP-SIG2 holoenzyme, we have now characterized chloroplast transcripts specifically affected by the sig2-1 mutation with the use of S1 nuclease mapping and primer extension analyses. Transcription from one of the multiple psbD promoters and two tRNA gene promoters was markedly and specifically impaired in the sig2-1 mutant. Alignment of the sequences upstream of the corresponding transcription initiation sites revealed that SIG2-dependent promoters in A.thaliana share structural similarity with Escherichia coli –10 and –35 core promoter elements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials
Seeds of A.thaliana WS (Wassilewskija), the sig2-1 mutant (18) and the sig2-1-complemented transgenic strain gB (18) were sterilized with 70% ethanol and 3% sodium hypochlorite before sowing on MS plates containing 0.4% Gelrite (Wako) or Jiffy 7 (AS Jiffy Products). After stratification at 4°C for 24 h in the dark, the seeds were grown at 23°C under continuous white light for 3 weeks. Total RNA was extracted and purified from leaves with the use of an RNA isolation kit (TRIzol reagent, Molecular Research Center).
Plasmid DNA for S1 probes
Standard recombinant DNA techniques were performed basically as described (20). DNA fragments encompassing the promoter regions of psbA (nucleotides –250 to +250 relative to the translation initiation codon), psbD (–1500 to +100 relative to the translation initiation codon), rbcL (–900 to +100 relative to the translation initiation codon), trnE-UUC (–441 to +41 relative to the 5′ end of the mature tRNAGlu), trnY-GUA (–250 to +50 relative to the 5′ end of the mature tRNATyr), trnD-GUC (–350 to +50 relative to the 5′ end of the mature tRNAAsp), trnV-UAC (–461 to +39 relative to the 5′ end of the mature tRNAVal), trnM-CAU (–441 to +41 relative to the 5′ end of the mature tRNAMet) or trnfM-CAU (–441 to +41 relative to the 5′ end of the mature tRNAfMet) were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction from A.thaliana genomic DNA with following primers: psbA, 5′-GGT GGATCCTTCATATGATTTGGAAAAA-3′ and 5′-GAGAAGCTTGAATAATGGCACCGGAAAT-3′; psbD, 5′-GGTGGATCCAAAATACCCCGTTAAGTAA-3′ and 5′-GAG AAGCTTACCAACCTACAAAAACGAA-3′; rbcL, 5′-GTACTGCAGGTACCGGACCAATGATTTG-3′ and 5′-GAGAAGCTTAAGATATCAGTATCCTTGGT-3′; trnE-UUC, 5′-GCGCTGCAGTTCCCTAATTAGAAGATGGAT-3′ and 5′-GACAAGCTTCCTTGAAAGAGAGATGTCCTG-3′; trnY-GUA, 5′-GGCTGCAGTTCTATAGAAAAAAGAAAAAAC-3′ and 5′-GCAAGCTTTTGCCAACGAATTTACAGTCCG-3′; trnD-GUC, 5′-GGCTGCAGGACTTTACTTTTTTCTTTATTT-3′ and 5′-ATAAGCTTCAGCTTCCGCCTTGACAGGGCG-3′; trnV-UAC, 5′-GGCTGCAGAGACAATTGAGG CTAATCTAGC-3′ and 5′-GCAAGCTTGTGTAAACGAGGTGCTCTACCT-3′; trnM-CAU, 5′-GCGCTGCAGATTGAGTAGACTGGGTATTCA-3′ and 5′-GGCAAGCTTGCCGT ATGAAAGCAATACTCT-3′; or trnfM-CAU, 5′-GTCCTGCAGATAGGGAGAAGAAGAGGCAAA-3′ and 5′-GACAAGCTTGGTTATGAGCCTTGCGAGCTA-3′.
The amplified DNA fragments were cloned into the pBluescript SK+ vector (Stratagene) with the use of restriction sites attached to the PCR primers (underlined). The resulting constructs were used to prepare the DNA probes for S1 nuclease protection analysis.
S1 nuclease protection assay
DNA probes labeled at their 5′ ends with 32P were hybridized with total RNA (5–30 µg) at 37°C for 16 h in 10 µl of hybridization buffer containing 40 mM PIPES–NaOH (pH 6.4), 1 mM EDTA, 0.4 M NaCl and 80% formamide. The hybridization mixture was then diluted with 100 µl of ice-cold S1 nuclease mixture containing 280 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.5), 4.5 mM ZnSO4 and S1 nuclease (500 U/ml) (TaKaRa). After incubation for 1 h at 20°C, the protected DNA probes were detected by electrophoresis through 5% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea followed by analysis with a BAS1000 image analyzer (Fujix).
Primer extension analysis
Sequence-specific oligonucleotides were end-labeled with 32P and hybridized with total RNA (25 µg) as described for S1 nuclease protection analysis. Primer extension was performed for 1 h at 42°C with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Extension products were separated on 5% Long Ranger sequencing gels (BMA). The 5′ ends of the extension products were determined by comparison with cDNA sequences generated from the same primers with the use of a LI-COR sequencing kit (EPICENTRE). The primer sequences were as follows: psbD –256 and psbD –186, 5′-TTCAGGGCGCTCAAATTCTATCATTTGTTT-3′; psbD –541, 5′-GTTGACGGGTTGAAGCAAAAAGGGAACTTT-3′; rbcL, 5′-GAGAAGCTTAAGATATCAGTATCCTTGGT-3′; trnE-UUC, 5′-GACAAGCTTCCTTGAAAGAGAGATGTCCTG-3′; and trnV-UAC, 5′-GCAAGCTTGTGTAAACGAGGTGCTCTACCT-3′.
In vitro capping and RNase protection assay
Total leaf RNA from wild-type seedlings was capped by guanylyltransferase (Ambion) as described (21). Labeled RNA was hybridized with an in vitro transcribed antisense RNA probe for the psbD gene and subjected to the ribonuclease protection assay (22) using RNase cocktail (Ambion). The protected RNA was electrophoresed through 5% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea and analyzed with a BAS1000 image analyzer (Fujix). To prepare the protecting RNA, the psbD –256 upstream region (nucleotide position from –501 to –220 relative to the ATG translation initiation site) was amplified with PCR using primers 5′-GGCGGATCCCATAAGGGCATGTACATATAG-3′ and 5′-GGCAAGCTTGGATCAACTCAATTTGTTTCT-3′. The amplified product was digested with BamHI–HindIII and cloned into pBluescript SK+ vector (Stratagene). For generating antisense RNA probe, the resulting plasmid was linearized with BamHI and transcribed using T7 Ribomax kit (Promega) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Expression and purification of recombinant SIG2 protein
The SIG2 cDNA fragment (13) was digested with BamHI and ligated in frame into pET-15b vector (Novagen), resulting in pET-SIG2 with six histidine residues at the N-terminus of partial SIG2 protein (amino acids 187–572). Following over-expression in the BL21 strain, the fusion protein was purified on a Ni-NTA agarose column (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Gel mobility shift assay
The recombinant sigma factor protein (30 ng) was mixed with 50 fmol 32P-labeled DNA probe, 3 µg poly [dI–dC] and 100 ng purified E.coli core RNA polymerase (23) in 50 µl solution of 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM DTT. The mixture was incubated at 30°C for 30 min, and DNA–protein complexes were separated on a native 4% polyacrylamide gel followed by analysis with a BAS1000 image analyzer (Fujix). To prepare the probe DNA, the psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC upstream regions were amplified with PCR and labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (TaKaRa). The primer sequences were as follows: psbD –256, 5′-GGCGGATCCCATAAGGGCATGTACATATAG-3′ and 5′-GGCAAGCTTGGATCAACTCAATTTGTTTCT-3′; trnE-UUC, 5′-GCGCTGCAGTTCCCTAATTAG AAGATGGAT-3′ and 5′-GACAAGCTTCCTTGAAAGAGAGATGTCCTG-3′; and trnV-UAC, 5′-GGCTGCAGAGACAATTGAGGCTAATCTAGC-3′ and 5′-GCAAGCTTGTG TAAACGAGGTGCTCTACCT-3′.
RESULTS
Transcription from one of the multiple psbD promoters is specifically reduced in the sig2-1 mutant
Three psbD transcripts with 5′ ends located 190, 550 and 950 nt upstream from the translation initiation codon have been identified in A.thaliana (24). We initially examined the effect of the sig2-1 mutation on transcription from the multiple psbD promoters with the use of S1 nuclease protection analysis. Three major transcripts were detected in the wild-type plant, one of which, that starting at nucleotide –256 (the nucleotide position corresponding to the 5′ end of each transcript was determined by primer extension analysis as described below), was barely detectable in the sig2-1 mutant (Fig. 2A). In contrast, those starting at nucleotides –186 and –541 were not affected by the mutation. A transcript starting at nucleotide –946 was more abundant in the mutant than in the wild-type. The sig2-1 mutation thus appeared to result in a specific reduction in transcription from the psbD –256 promoter. We also examined the expression of two other photosynthesis-related genes, psbA and rbcL, by S1 nuclease protection analysis. Neither transcription from the psbA and rbcL promoters nor the abundance of a putative processed transcript of rbcL (rbcL –70) was affected by the sig2-1 mutation (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.
Transcript mapping of photosynthesis-related genes in A.thaliana. Transcripts of psbD (A) or of psbA and rbcL (B) were analyzed by the S1 nuclease protection assay with the indicated amounts of total RNA from wild-type (WT) and sig2-1 mutant (MT) leaves. The nucleotide positions of the 5′ ends of transcripts relative to the ATG translation initiation site were determined by primer extension analysis and are indicated on the left.
Accumulation of specific plastid-encoded tRNAs is SIG2 dependent
With the use of northern blot analysis, we previously showed that the abundance of transcripts of four tRNA genes (trnE-UUC, trnD-GUC, trnM-CAU and trnV-UAC) was reduced in the sig2-1 mutant (18). To clarify the role of SIG2 in transcription of these genes, we first analyzed trnE-UUC transcripts by the S1 nuclease protection assay. Analysis of total RNA from wild-type leaves revealed two transcripts: a major transcript that corresponded to the mature glutamate tRNA (tRNAGlu), and a minor transcript that had a 5′ end located 26 bp upstream from that of the mature tRNAGlu and was likely the precursor (Fig. 3A). The abundance of both of these RNA molecules was markedly reduced in the sig2-1 mutant. The amounts of the primary and mature transcripts derived from trnV-UAC were also substantially reduced in the sig2-1 mutant (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3.
Transcript mapping of plastid tRNA genes in A.thaliana. Transcripts of trnE-UUC (A), trnV-UAC (B) or trnY-GUA, trnD-GUC, trnM-CAU and trnfM-CAU (C) were analyzed by the S1 nuclease protection assay with the indicated amounts of total RNA from wild-type (WT) and sig2-1 mutant (MT) leaves. The nucleotide positions of the 5′ ends of transcripts relative to those of the mature tRNAs are indicated on the left.
We then analyzed several other tRNA genes (trnY-GUA, trnD-GUC, trnM-CAU and trnfM-CAU). For trnY-GUA, trnD-GUC and trnM-CAU, S1 mapping analysis identified only one major transcript, corresponding to the mature tRNA (tRNATyr, tRNAAsp and tRNAMet, respectively). The abundance of each tRNA was slightly reduced in the sig2-1 mutant compared with that in the wild-type at 3 weeks of age (Fig. 3C). We also detected only one major transcript of trnfM-CAU, again corresponding to the mature tRNA (tRNAfMet), but the amount of this transcript did not differ between mutant and wild-type plants.
Mapping of the 5′ ends of the chloroplast transcripts by primer extension
Our S1 nuclease protection analysis identified three transcripts (psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC) whose abundance was substantially reduced in the sig2-1 mutant. We mapped the precise positions of the transcription initiation sites of these RNA species by primer extension analysis. The 5′ ends of the transcripts so determined were consistent with the results obtained with the S1 assays (Fig. 4A–C); moreover, the signals obtained with the sig2-1 mutant were weaker than those obtained with the wild-type (data not shown). The 5′ ends of Arabidopsis psbA (25) and psbD –946 (24) were identified previously. We mapped the 5′ ends of psbD –190, psbD –550 and rbcL transcripts more precisely as psbD –186, psbD –541 (data not shown) and rbcL –179 (Fig. 4D).
Figure 4.
High-resolution mapping of the 5′ ends of SIG2-dependent (A–C) and SIG2-independent (D) transcripts. The psbD –256 (A), trnE-UUC (B), trnV-UAC (C) and rbcL (D) transcripts were analyzed by primer extension analysis with 25 µg of total RNA from wild-type (WT) leaves. The cDNA sequences (A, C, G and T) obtained with the same primers are also shown. Arrows indicate the positions of the 5′ ends of each transcript that correspond to the bands shown in Figures 2 and 3.
The 5′ end of psbD –256 is of a primary transcript
In Figure 2A, the amount of a transcript from psbD –256 was specifically decreased in the sig2-1 mutant. In order to verify whether this transcript is derived from RNA processing or the actual 5′ end of a primary transcript, we analyzed this transcript by in vitro capping and RNase protection assay. A protected 37-nt transcript that corresponds to the 5′ end of the psbD –256 transcript was clearly detected (Fig. 5). This result demonstrates that the 5′ end of Arabidopsis psbD –256 is a site of a primary transcript, not a processing product.
Figure 5.
Ribonuclease protection assay for the in vitro capped primary transcript from psbD –256. Fifty micrograms of total RNA from wild-type leaves was capped by guanylyltransferase and [α-32P]GTP, followed by RNase protection assay using in vitro transcribed antisence RNA for the psbD gene as a probe. Note that the probe protects a 37-nt fragment for the transcript from psbD –256. Lane M shows RNA marker of the sizes indicated at the right.
DNA binding affinity of the recombinant SIG2 protein to SIG2-dependent chloroplast promoters
We identified three SIG2-dependent transcripts (psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC) by means of S1 mapping analysis. To further confirm the role of SIG2 in recognition of these promoters, we used gel-shift DNA binding assays. The heterologous system was based on previous reports demonstrating that the recombinant chloroplast sigma factor(s) mixed with E.coli core RNA polymerase could efficiently bind to the promoter DNA (26,27). As shown in Figure 6, a shifted band corresponding to a DNA–protein complex was detected (lanes 3) when the recombinant SIG2 protein and E.coli core RNA polymerase was incubated with a DNA fragment containing the promoter region of psbD –256 (left panel), trnE-UUC (middle panel) or trnV-UAC (right panel). This binding signal was markedly reduced in the presence of excess unlabeled promoter DNA as a competitor (lanes 4). None of the control reactions consisting of the probe DNA alone (lanes 1), or the probe DNA and the recombinant SIG2 protein (lanes 2), gave a shifted band of the promoter-SIG2 complex. No shifted band was also detected when the DNA probe was mixed with E.coli core RNA polymerase alone (lane C). These observations strongly suggest that these three promoters are recognized by PEP-SIG2 holoenzyme.
Figure 6.
Gel-shift DNA binding assay with the recombinant SIG2 protein. The SIG2 protein was incubated with a 32P-labeled DNA fragment containing psbD –256 (left), trnE-UUC (middle), trnV-UAC (right) promoter region in the absence (lane 2) or presence (lane 3) of E.coli core RNA polymerase. Labeled DNA alone (lane 1), and a DNA probe with core RNA polymerase (lane C) were also shown as controls. Competition experiments were carried out as in lane 3 with a 100-fold excess of unlabeled each promoter fragment (lane 4).
Marked homology of Arabidopsis SIG2-dependent promoters upstream of the transcription initiation sites
We next compared the nucleotide sequences of genes upstream of the mapped 5′ ends of transcripts (Fig. 7). The consensus sequence of sigma70-type promoters in E.coli comprises TTGACA (–35 element) and TATAAT (–10 element) with a 17–19-bp spacer (28,29). We identified –35 element-like and –10 element-like sequences upstream of the transcription initiation sites of the SIG2-dependent psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC promoters as well as of those of the promoters of psbA, rbcL and psbD –946. The –10 element was partially conserved between psbD –256 (TAT ACT), trnE-UUC (TACTAT) and trnV-UAC (TAAGAT) promoters, whereas the –35 element was identical (TTGACA) in the two tRNA gene promoters. In addition, the conserved pentanucleotide element [A(A/T)TTA] in the spacer region was found only in three SIG2-dependent promoters.
Figure 7.
Alignment of nucleotide sequences of the regions upstream of the transcription initiation sites of SIG2-independent (A) and SIG2-dependent (B) Arabidopsis gene promoters. The arrows indicate the position corresponding to the 5′ end of each major transcript. The E.coli-like –35 and –10 promoter elements are boxed, and the underlined regions refer to conserved promoter elements specific to the three SIG2-dependent promoters. The consensus sequence motifs for the –35-like and –10-like elements of the SIG2-dependent promoters are also indicated in (B); upper case and lower case letters denote nucleotides that are completely or partially conserved among the three promoters.
In vivo complementation of SIG2-dependent transcription defects by a SIG2 transgene
We established previously a transgenic Arabidopsis line, designated gB, by introducing the SIG2 genomic region into the sig2-1 background (18). Normal leaf color was restored in the transgenic plants (Fig. 1). We examined the effect of in vivo complementation of the sig2-1 mutation on SIG2-dependent transcription by S1 mapping. The marked reduction in transcription from the psbD –256 promoter observed in the sig2-1 mutant was no longer apparent in the gB transgenic line, which showed a transcript abundance similar to that of the wild-type (Fig. 8A). The gB plant also did not exhibit the marked decreases in the abundance of both the primary and mature transcripts of trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC observed in the sig2-1 mutant (Fig. 8B). These results thus support the notion that the psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC promoters are recognized by PEP in a SIG2-dependent manner.
Figure 8.
In vivo complementation of SIG2-dependent transcriptional defects. The psbD (A) as well as trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC (B) transcripts were analyzed by S1 nuclease protection assays with the indicated amounts of total RNA from wild-type (WT), sig2-1 mutant (MT) and gB transgenic leaves. The nucleotide positions of the 5′ ends of transcripts relative to the ATG translation initiation site or to the 5′ end of the mature tRNA are indicated on the left.
DISCUSSION
Little is known of the roles of the multiple nucleus-encoded sigma factors in selective recognition of the promoters of plastid-encoded genes. Our study has now provided several lines of experimental evidence indicating that the Arabidopsis psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC promoters are transcribed in a SIG2-dependent manner. Sequence analysis of the regions flanking the transcription initiation sites of these genes also revealed that they contain promoter elements (–35-like and –10-like elements) similar to those required for transcription in E.coli. In vivo complementation demonstrated that the marked decreases in the amounts of the corresponding transcripts apparent in the sig2-1 mutant were corrected by the introduction of a SIG2 transgene. Moreover, DNA fragments containing the promoter region of these genes could be specifically bound to the recombinant SIG2 protein with E.coli core RNA polymerase. These findings as well as the result by in vitro capping experiment strongly indicate that the psbD –256 mRNA is a primary transcript generated from a SIG2-dependent promoter rather than a product of RNA processing.
A psbD transcript initiated at nucleotide position –946 has also been identified and shown to be derived from a blue light-responsive promoter (BLRP) (24,30,31). This transcript was more abundant in the sig2-1 mutant than in the wild-type, possibly because transcription from the psbD BLRP depends on a sigma factor whose ratio of association with the PEP core enzyme is increased in the sig2-1 mutant, or because of compensatory mechanisms among sigma factors or gene-specific DNA-binding proteins such as PTF1, a transcription factor for the AGT box in the psbD BLRP (32). Very recently, blue light dependency of the SIG5 expression was reported and suggested to be involved in the recognition of the psbD BLRP in A.thaliana (33). Our results therefore now indicate that at least two different sigma factors mediate transcription from the multiple psbD promoters in A.thaliana. In maize, complementary expression of two sigma factors has also been suggested to support the differential expression of plastid genes (34).
We have also identified the 5′ ends of two Arabidopsis rbcL transcripts. The transcript whose 5′ end mapped to position –70 relative to the translation initiation site has been shown previously to be generated by RNA processing in other plants (35–37). The nucleotide sequence of A.thaliana rbcL upstream of the position (–179) corresponding to the 5′ end of the other transcript is highly homologous to that of functional rbcL promoters in other plants (data not shown). The abundance of neither of the rbcL transcripts nor that of psbA mRNA was affected by the sig2-1 mutation, suggesting that the corresponding promoters are recognized by sigma factors other than SIG2. This conclusion is supported by the results of heterologous in vitro transcription assays showing that SIG1 contributes to transcription from psbA and rbcL promoters in mustard and Arabidopsis (26,38).
We performed S1 mapping and gel mobility shift analyses and showed that SIG2-dependent promoter was located upstream of the trnE gene. The trnE, trnY and trnD genes are tandemly arranged on the plastid genome (39) and are co-transcribed in tobacco chloroplasts (40). We have now shown that the accumulation of all three encoded tRNAs is SIG2 dependent. These observations may indicate that SIG2 mediates transcription of the trnE-trnY-trnD operon from the promoter upstream of trnE in Arabidopsis.
The tRNAs encoded by trnV-UAC and trnM-CAU also accumulated in a manner dependent on SIG2. Although both tRNA genes share conserved upstream sequences (18), we detected a precursor only for trnV. Given that no genes have been assigned nearby trnM (39), transcripts derived from the upstream region of this gene may be processed immediately to the mature tRNAMet. A similar explanation may underlie our failure to detect a precursor of the SIG2-independent trnfM-CAU gene; although it is located downstream of the psaA-psaB-rps14 operon, co-transcripts extending to this gene were not detected in tobacco (41).
The sequences of the SIG2-dependent promoters of psbD –256, trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC are distinct but share structural similarities to E.coli-type –35 (TTGACA) and –10 (TATAAT) core promoter elements. The –35 elements of the trnE-UUC and trnV-UAC promoters are identical to that of the sigma70 consensus sequence (TTGACA) whereas that of psbD –256 (TTCATG) is less conserved, possibly explaining the differential dependence of these genes on SIG2.
In the chloroplast of plants, the tRNAGlu is known to be required for translation of plastid genes as well as for synthesis of ALA, the precursor of tetrapyrrole compounds (42,43). Thus, these observations might explain in higher plant species that SIG2-dependent expression of plastid tRNA genes plays quite important roles in coupling of protein and chlorophyll biosynthesis for normal chloroplast development.
Acknowledgments
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aids for Scientific Research to K.K. [No. 13640641 and Priority Area (C) No. 13202016], to K.T. [No. 14340248 and Priority Area (A) No. 12025204] and to H.T. (No. 11694196), and by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology (to K.T.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. M.H. is a Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sugita M. and Sugiura,M. (1996) Regulation of gene expression in chloroplasts of higher plants. Plant Mol. Biol., 32, 315–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maliga P. (1998) Two plastid RNA polymerases of higher plants: an evolving story. Trends Plant Sci., 3, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hess W.R. and Börner,T. (1999) Organellar RNA polymerases of higher plants. Int. Rev. Cytol., 190, 1–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hedtke B., Börner,T. and Weihe,A. (1997) Mitochondrial and chloroplast phage-type RNA polymerases in Arabidopsis. Science, 277, 809–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chang C.C., Sheen,J., Bligny,M., Niwa,Y., Lerbs-Mache,S. and Stern,D.B. (1999) Functional analysis of two maize cDNAs encoding T7-like RNA polymerases. Plant Cell, 11, 911–926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hajdukiewicz P.T., Allison,L.A. and Maliga,P. (1997) The two RNA polymerases encoded by the nuclear and the plastid compartments transcribe distinct groups of genes in tobacco plastids. EMBO J., 16, 4041–4048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Allison L.A., Simon,L.D. and Maliga,P. (1996) Deletion of rpoB reveals a second distinct transcription system in plastids of higher plants. EMBO J., 15, 2802–2809. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Santis-Maciossek G., Kofer,W., Bock,A., Schoch,S., Maier,R.M., Wanner,G., Rudiger,W., Koop,H.U. and Herrmann,R.G. (1999) Targeted disruption of the plastid RNA polymerase genes rpoA, B and C1: molecular biology, biochemistry and ultrastructure. Plant J., 18, 477–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allison L.A. (2000) The role of sigma factors in plastid transcription. Biochimie, 82, 537–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu B. and Troxler,R.F. (1996) Molecular characterization of a positively photoregulated nuclear gene for a chloroplast RNA polymerase sigma factor in Cyanidium caldarium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 3313–3318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tanaka K., Oikawa,K., Ohta,N., Kuroiwa,H., Kuroiwa,T. and Takahashi,H. (1996) Nuclear encoding of a chloroplast RNA polymerase sigma subunit in a red alga. Science, 272, 1932–1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Isono K., Shimizu,M., Yoshimoto,K., Niwa,Y., Satoh,K., Yokota,A. and Kobayashi,H. (1997) Leaf-specifically expressed genes for polypeptides destined for chloroplasts with domains of sigma70 factors of bacterial RNA polymerases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 14948–14953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tanaka K., Tozawa,Y., Mochizuki,N., Shinozaki,K., Nagatani,A., Wakasa,K. and Takahashi,H. (1997) Characterization of three cDNA species encoding plastid RNA polymerase sigma factors in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for the sigma factor heterogeneity in higher plant plastids. FEBS Lett., 413, 309–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujiwara M., Nagashima,A., Kanamaru,K., Tanaka,K. and Takahashi,H. (2000) Three new nuclear genes, sigD, sigE and sigF, encoding putative plastid RNA polymerase sigma factors in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett., 481, 47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oikawa K., Fujiwara,M., Nakazato,E., Tanaka,K. and Takahashi,H. (2000) Characterization of two plastid sigma factors, SigA1 and SigA2, that mainly function in matured chloroplasts in Nicotiana tabacum. Gene, 261, 221–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tozawa Y., Tanaka,K., Takahashi,H. and Wakasa,K. (1998) Nuclear encoding of a plastid sigma factor in rice and its tissue- and light-dependent expression. Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 415–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kanamaru K., Fujiwara,M., Seki,M., Katagiri,T., Nakamura,M., Mochizuki,N., Nagatani,A., Shinozaki,K., Tanaka,K. and Takahashi,H. (1999) Plastidic RNA polymerase sigma factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol., 40, 832–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kanamaru K., Nagashima,A., Fujiwara,M., Shimada,H., Shirano,Y., Nakabayashi,K., Shibata,D., Tanaka,K. and Takahashi,H. (2001) An Arabidopsis sigma factor (SIG2)-dependent expression of plastid-encoded tRNAs in chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol., 42, 1034–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shirano Y., Shimada,H., Kanamaru,K., Fujiwara,M., Tanaka,K., Takahashi,H., Unno,K., Sato,S., Tabata,S., Hayashi,H., Miyake,C., Yokota,A. and Shibata,D. (2000) Chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana requires the nuclear-encoded transcription factor sigma B. FEBS Lett., 485, 178–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sambrook J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kennell J.C. and Pring,D.R. (1989) Initiation and processing of atp6, T-urf13 and ORF221 transcripts from mitochondria of T cytoplasm maize. Mol. Gen. Genet., 216, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vera A. and Sugiura,M. (1992) Combination of in vitro capping and ribonuclease protection improves the detection of transcription start sites in chloroplasts. Plant Mol. Biol., 19, 309–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Igarashi K. and Ishihama,A. (1991) Bipartite functional map of the E. coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit: involvement of the C-terminal region in transcription activation by cAMP-CRP. Cell, 65, 1015–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hoffer P.H. and Christopher,D.A. (1997) Structure and blue-light-responsive transcription of a chloroplast psbD promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol., 115, 213–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liere K., Kestermann,M., Muller,U. and Link,G. (1995) Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast DNA region containing the genes psbA, trnH and rps19. Curr. Genet., 28, 128–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kestermann M., Neukirchen,S., Kloppstech,K. and Link,G. (1998) Sequence and expression characteristics of a nuclear-encoded chloroplast sigma factor from mustard (Sinapis alba). Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 2747–2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Homann A. and Link,G. (2003) DNA-binding and transcription characteristics of three cloned sigma factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) suggest overlapping and distinct roles in plastid gene expression. Eur. J. Biochem., 270, 1288–1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lonetto M., Gribskov,M. and Gross,C.A. (1992) The sigma 70 family: sequence conservation and evolutionary relationships. J. Bacteriol., 174, 3843–3849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gross C.A., Chan,C., Dombroski,A., Gruber,T., Sharp,M., Tupy,J. and Young,B. (1998) The functional and regulatory roles of sigma factors in transcription. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 63, 141–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Christopher D.A. and Hoffer,P.H. (1998) DET1 represses a chloroplast blue light-responsive promoter in a developmental and tissue-specific manner in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J., 14, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thum K.E., Kim,M., Christopher,D.A. and Mullet,J.E. (2001) Cryptochrome 1, cryptochrome 2, and phytochrome A co-activate the chloroplast psbD blue light-responsive promoter. Plant Cell, 13, 2747–2760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Baba K., Nakano,T., Yamagishi,K. and Yoshida,S. (2001) Involvement of a nuclear-encoded basic helix-loop-helix protein in transcription of the light-responsive promoter of psbD. Plant Physiol., 125, 595–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsunoyama Y., Morikawa,K., Shiina,T. and Toyoshima,Y. (2002) Blue light specific and differential expression of a plastid sigma factor, Sig5 in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett., 516, 225–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lahiri S.D. and Allison,L.A. (2000) Complementary expression of two plastid-localized sigma-like factors in maize. Plant Physiol., 123, 883–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hanley-Bowdoin L., Orozco,E.M. and Chua,N.-H. (1985) In vitro synthesis and processing of a maize chloroplast transcript encoded by the ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit gene. Mol. Cell. Biol., 5, 2733–2745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mullet J.E., Orozco,E.M. and Chua,N.-H. (1985) Multiple transcripts for higher plant rbcL and atpB genes and localization of the transcription initiation sites of the rbcL gene. Plant Mol. Biol., 4, 39–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reinbothe S., Reinbothe,C., Heintzen,C., Seidenbecher,C. and Parthier,B. (1993) A methyl jasmonate-induced shift in the length of the 5′ untranslated region impairs translation of the plastid rbcL transcript in barley. EMBO J., 12, 1505–1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hakimi M.A., Privat,I., Valay,J.G. and Lerbs-Mache,S. (2000) Evolutionary conservation of C-terminal domains of primary sigma(70)-type transcription factors between plants and bacteria. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 9215–9221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sato S., Nakamura,Y., Kaneko,T., Asamizu,E. and Tabata,S. (1999) Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res., 6, 283–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ohme M., Kamogashira,T., Shinozaki,K. and Sugiura,M. (1985) Structure and cotranscription of tobacco chloroplast genes for tRNAGlu(UUC), tRNATyr(GUA) and tRNAAsp(GUC). Nucleic Acids Res., 13, 1045–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Meng B.Y., Tanaka,M., Wakasugi,T., Ohme,M., Shinozaki,K. and Sugiura,M. (1988) Cotranscription of the genes encoding two P700 chlorophyll a apoproteins with the gene for ribosomal protein CS14: determination of the transcriptional initiation site by in vitro capping. Curr. Genet., 14, 395–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schon A., Krupp,G., Gough,S., Berry-Lowe,S., Kannangara,C.G. and Soll,D. (1986) The RNA required in the first step of chlorophyll biosynthesis is a chloroplast glutamate tRNA. Nature, 322, 281–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jahn D., Verkamp,E. and Soll,D. (1992) Glutamyl-transfer RNA: a precursor of heme and chlorophyll biosynthesis. Trends Biochem. Sci., 17, 215–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]