Skip to main content
Communicative & Integrative Biology logoLink to Communicative & Integrative Biology
. 2010 May-Jun;3(3):231–233. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.3.11242

M-Sec

Emerging secrets of tunneling nanotube formation

Hiroshi Ohno 1,, Koji Hase 1, Shunsuke Kimura 1
PMCID: PMC2918763  PMID: 20714400

Abstract

Tunneling nanotubes (TNT) are the latest addition to the array of strategies used for intercellular signaling. TNTs are continuous conduits of the plasma membrane that allow direct physical connection of plasma membranes and cytosol among remote cells. They are important for intercellular communication by mediating exchange of cellular components as well as signal transduction molecules. Despite ample evidence suggesting the pathophysiological importance of TNTs, virtually nothing is known about the molecular basis for their formation. With the lack of specific TNT markers, their study has relied solely on morphological analyses, and the precise identity of TNT and TNTlike structures have been difficult to define. We have now shown that M-Sec is a TNT marker and a central factor for TNT formation. In cooperation with the RalA small GTPase and the exocyst complex, M-Sec can induce the formation of functional TNTs, indicating that the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton is involved in M-Sec-mediated TNT formation. Discovery of the role of M-Sec will accelerate our understanding of TNTs, both at the molecular and physiological levels.

Key words: tunneling nanotube, M-Sec, RalA, exocyst complex, F-actin, virus infection


Immune cells employ various ways to communicate with other cells. Direct cell-cell contact, for example, takes place during antigen presentation by dendritic cells for T-cell activation. The interface between the two cells is referred to as the immunological synapse.1 Gap junctions are another class of direct intercellular contacts that can mediate transfer of small molecular weight solutes between the cytoplasm of two connected cells.2 In contrast, interactions between remote cells are often mediated by humoral factors such as cytokines where the signal donor cell secretes the factor and the acceptor cell expresses the cognate receptor on its cell surface to receive signals. Yet another form of intercellular communication is mediated by membrane vesicles, in particular exosomes.3 Exosomes are small vesicular structures contained in late endosomes or multivesicular bodies. These multifunctional vesicles are produced by invagination of the limiting membrane of these organelles and are released upon fusion of the organelles with the plasma membrane. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) and related structures are the latest addition to the lineup of cell-cell interaction platforms.46

TNTs were first described in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells,7 but subsequent studies have revealed that many cell types, including those in the immune system such as dendritic cells and macrophages, also form TNTs.46 TNTs are a continuous conduit of the plasma membrane that allows direct physical connections of plasma membranes and the cytosol of remote cells. Hence, TNTs are thought to be important for intercellular communication by mediating exchange of materials, ranging in size from as small as Ca2+ ions to as large as cytoplasmic vesicles and/or small organelles of endosomal/lysosomal origin. Moreover, TNTs are occasionally ‘hijacked’ by viruses for intercellular spreading, a strategy that protects them from exposure to the extracellular space and enables them to evade host humoral immunity.

Despite the ample evidence suggesting their pathophysiological importance, virtually nothing has been known about the molecular basis for TNT formation. Moreover, owing to the lack of specific TNT markers, the identification of these structures has been mainly based on morphological criteria and the presence of cytoskeletal elements. This type of analysis has revealed some heterogeneity in TNT and TNT-like structures, such as the existence of microtubule-containing TNTs and close-ended filopodial bridges. We have now shown that M-Sec is a TNT marker and central factor for TNT formation.8 M-Sec was first described as tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 2 (also called B94),9,10 but its function has long been unknown. We found that M-Sec can induce functional TNTs in cooperation with the RalA small GTPase and the exocyst complex, indicating that remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton is involved in M-Sec-mediated TNT formation. Despite its sequence homology with Sec6, a component of the exocyst complex, M-Sec itself does not seem to be included in the complex. M-Sec likely coordinates with RalA and the exocyst complex to initiate TNT formation whereas cdc42 seems to be required for TNT elongation, since short protrusions of membrane tubules accumulate without further elongation in the presence of dominant negative cdc42.8

Involvement of actin remodeling in M-Sec-mediated TNT formation is consistent with a previous observation that TNTs are associated with F-actin. In fact, M-Sec-induced TNTs are associated with F-actin but not with microtubules.8 It has been reported that there are two types of TNTs in macrophages, thin TNTs only associated with F-actin and thicker ones with both F-action and microtubules.11 The formation of the thick microtubulecontaining TNTs may be totally independent of M-Sec, or it may require M-Sec in combination with other, as-yet-unidentified, factor(s).

Although TNT-like structures were observed upon transient expression of M-Sec in HeLa cells, functional TNTs mediating Ca2+ flux only formed when M-Sec was stably expressed (our unpublished observation). These results suggest that the TNT-like structures induced by transient M-Sec expression are close-ended membrane protrusion, the so-called filopodial bridges.5,6,12 This observation could be explained if functional TNT formation requires the expression of M-Sec in both of the cells connected by a TNT, as would be the case for stable M-Sec transfectants. After transient transfection, by contrast, a substantial portion of the cells would not express M-Sec; accordingly, TNT-like protrusions formed by a cell expressing M-Sec would be abortive, resulting in formation of filopodial bridges instead of a complete TNT upon reaching a nearby cell without M-Sec expression. Another possibility is that sustained expression of M-Sec is required for membrane fusion at the tips of the nanotubes to form TNTs. Recently, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the causative agent of aquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), was reported to utilize TNT or filopodial bridges for intercellular transmission, not only in macrophages13 but also in T lymphocytes.14 Steady-state expression of M-Sec is essentially restricted to myelomonocytic lineage cells in normal adult tissues, thus normal T cells are largely devoid of M-Sec (ref. 10; and RefDIC,15 http://refdic.rcai.riken.jp/welcome.cgi). However, human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 is known to induce M-Sec expression in T cells.16 Therefore, it is possible that HIV-1 may also induce M-Sec expression to promote TNT-like structures in T cells, resulting in the enhancement of intercellular HIV transmission. Intriguingly, Xu et al.17 have reported recently that HIV- 1-infected macrophages transfer viruses and/or the viral protein Nef to surrouding B cells via TNT. This process ultimately suppresses the production of virus-specific IgG2 and IgA and results in the evasion of humoral immune responses by HIV-1. Taken together, these observations suggest that TNTs play a critical role in viral pathology including HIV-1.

The discovery of M-Sec as a marker for TNTs and a promoter of TNT formation will help clarify the mechanisms of formation of these structures as well as their structural and functional properties. We have recently established M-Sec knockout mice, which should be a useful model to uncover the physiological role of TNTs. In addition, the identification of M-Sec-targeted drugs may provide a new strategy for containment of viral infections such as HIV.

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter D. Burrows for critically reading the manuscript. This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific research (B) (H.O.), Young Scientists (K.H.), Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (H.O.) and Scientific Research in Priority Areas (K.H.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Addendum to: Hase K, Kimura S, Takatsu H, Ohmae M, Kawano S, Kitamura H, et al. M-Sec promotes membrane nanotube formation by interacting with Ral and the exocyst complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1427–1432. doi: 10.1038/ncb1990.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Saito T, Yokosuka T. Immunological synapse and microclusters: the site for recognition and activation of T cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:305–313. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oviedo-Orta E, Howard Evans W. Gap junctions and connexin-mediated communication in the immune system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662:102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thery C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:581–593. doi: 10.1038/nri2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gerdes HH, Carvalho RN. Intercellular transfer mediated by tunneling nanotubes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:470–475. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davis DM, Sowinski S. Membrane nanotubes: dynamic long-distance connections between animal cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:431–436. doi: 10.1038/nrm2399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sherer NM, Mothes W. Cytonemes and tunneling nanotubules in cell-cell communication and viral pathogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:414–420. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rustom A, Saffrich R, Markovic I, Walther P, Gerdes HH. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science. 2004;303:1007–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1093133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hase K, Kimura S, Takatsu H, Ohmae M, Kawano S, Kitamura H, et al. M-Sec promotes membrane nanotube formation by interacting with Ral and the exocyst complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1427–1432. doi: 10.1038/ncb1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sarma V, Wolf FW, Marks RM, Shows TB, Dixit VM. Cloning of a novel tumor necrosis factor-alphainducible primary response gene that is differentially expressed in development and capillary tube-like formation in vitro. J Immunol. 1992;148:3302–3312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wolf FW, Sarma V, Seldin M, Drake S, Suchard SJ, Shao H, et al. B94, a primary response gene inducible by tumor necrosis factor-alpha, is expressed in developing hematopoietic tissues and the sperm acrosome. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:3633–3640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Onfelt B, Nedvetzki S, Benninger RK, Purbhoo MA, Sowinski S, Hume AN, et al. Structurally distinct membrane nanotubes between human macrophages support long-distance vesicular traffic or surfing of bacteria. J Immunol. 2006;177:8476–8483. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.12.8476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sherer NM, Lehmann MJ, Jimenez-Soto LF, Horensavitz C, Pypaert M, Mothes W. Retroviruses can establish filopodial bridges for efficient cell-tocell transmission. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:310–315. doi: 10.1038/ncb1544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eugenin EA, Gaskill PJ, Berman JW. Tunneling nanotubes (TNT) are induced by HIV-infection of macrophages: a potential mechanism for intercellular HIV trafficking. Cell Immunol. 2009;254:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sowinski S, Jolly C, Berninghausen O, Purbhoo MA, Chauveau A, Kohler K, et al. Membrane nanotubes physically connect T cells over long distances presenting a novel route for HIV-1 transmission. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:211–219. doi: 10.1038/ncb1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hijikata A, Kitamura H, Kimura Y, Yokoyama R, Aiba Y, Bao Y, et al. Construction of an open-access database that integrates cross-reference information from the transcriptome and proteome of immune cells. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2934–2941. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ruckes T, Saul D, Van Snick J, Hermine O, Grassmann R. Autocrine antiapoptotic stimulation of cultured adult T-cell leukemia cells by overexpression of the chemokine I-309. Blood. 2001;98:1150–1159. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.4.1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xu W, Santini PA, Sullivan JS, He B, Shan M, Ball SC, et al. HIV-1 evades virus-specific IgG2 and IgA responses by targeting systemic and intestinal B cells via long-range intercellular conduits. Nature Immunol. 2009;10:1008–1017. doi: 10.1038/ni.1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Communicative & Integrative Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES