Skip to main content
Eukaryotic Cell logoLink to Eukaryotic Cell
. 2010 Aug;9(8):1184–1192. doi: 10.1128/EC.00006-10

C Terminus of Nce102 Determines the Structure and Function of Microdomains in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Plasma Membrane

Martin Loibl 1,, Guido Grossmann 1,, Vendula Stradalova 2, Andreas Klingl 3, Reinhard Rachel 3, Widmar Tanner 1, Jan Malinsky 1,*, Miroslava Opekarová 4
PMCID: PMC2918937  PMID: 20581291

Abstract

The plasma membrane of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains stably distributed lateral domains of specific composition and structure, termed MCC (membrane compartment of arginine permease Can1). Accumulation of Can1 and other specific proton symporters within MCC is known to regulate the turnover of these transporters and is controlled by the presence of another MCC protein, Nce102. We show that in an NCE102 deletion strain the function of Nce102 in directing the specific permeases into MCC can be complemented by overexpression of the NCE102 close homolog FHN1 (the previously uncharacterized YGR131W) as well as by distant Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog fhn1 (SPBC1685.13). We conclude that this mechanism of plasma membrane organization is conserved through the phylum Ascomycota. We used a hemagglutinin (HA)/Suc2/His4C reporter to determine the membrane topology of Nce102. In contrast to predictions, its N and C termini are oriented toward the cytosol. Deletion of the C terminus or even of its last 6 amino acids does not disturb protein trafficking, but it seriously affects the formation of MCC. We show that the C-terminal part of the Nce102 protein is necessary for localization of both Nce102 itself and Can1 to MCC and also for the formation of furrow-like membrane invaginations, the characteristic ultrastructural feature of MCC domains.


Stable lateral domains coexist within the plasma membrane of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nce102, a protein originally thought to be involved in nonclassical export (6) and more recently in sensing sphingolipids (10), is the main organizer of one type of these domains, termed MCC (membrane compartment of Can1) (25). MCC consists of evenly distributed, isolated patches enriched in sterols and specific proteins (15, 16, 25, 26). We showed that MCC-specific proton symporters accumulate in these patches in a reversible, membrane potential-dependent manner. This Nce102-mediated transient MCC accumulation plays a key role in the turnover of the transporters (16). Each MCC patch is accompanied by an eisosome, a cytosolic complex located directly beneath the membrane (36).

In an early freeze-etching study, Moor and Mühlethaler (28) demonstrated that the yeast plasma membrane contains numerous furrow-like invaginations. Recently, MCC patches were identified with these plasma membrane structures, and Nce102 was shown to be necessary for furrow formation. On the ultrastructural level, the MCC patches of nce102Δ cells appeared as flat, smooth, elongated areas within an otherwise particle-rich plasma membrane (32).

There is now increasing evidence that cytosolic Pil1, a primary component of eisosomes, is a prerequisite for MCC patch formation. It marks the sites where Nce102 and the MCC-specific transporters will subsequently accumulate (16, 23, 29). Data published so far do not indicate a direct involvement of cytoskeletal components in this process (26). Accordingly, markers of classical endocytosis, which are coupled to the cortical patches of actin, were localized outside the MCC (16).

In this paper we examine the contribution of Nce102 to the organization of MCC patches and of furrow-like invaginations. Our results indicate that, in contrast to the prediction of four transmembrane domains (TMDs), the Nce102 molecule might span the plasma membrane only twice, the C and N termini being oriented toward the cytoplasm. We find that the C-terminal 6 amino acids of Nce102 are essential for MCC patch formation as well as for the formation of the furrow-like membrane invaginations. In addition it is shown that this Nce102 function is phylogenetically conserved among Ascomycota.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast strains and growth conditions.

Yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1 (4, 15, 19, 33). If not stated otherwise, cells were grown in a rich medium (YPD [1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose]) at 30°C on a shaker. Synthetic defined (SD) medium contained 0.67% Difco yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and 2% glucose supplemented with, depending on which marker was used to select for transformed cells, uracil and adenine (both 20 μg/ml) and amino acids (histidine, methionine, and tryptophan, each at 20 μg/ml, and lysine and leucine, each at 30 μg/ml). All yeast transformations were carried out by the high-efficiency method described by Gietz and Woods (14).

Table 1.

Yeast strains used in this study

Strain Genotype Reference or source
BY4741 MATahis3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 4
GYS90 BY4741; YIplac211-CAN1-GFP 15
GYS91 BY4741; nce102::kanMX4 EUROSCARF
VSY1 GYS91; CAN1::GFP::LEU2 (YIp128) This study
VSY4 VSY1; pVT100U-NCE102-mRFP This study
VSY5 VSY1; pVT100U-YGR131W-mRFP This study
VSY6 VSY1; pVT100U-mRFP This study
VSY47 VSY1; pVT100U-SPBC1685.13-mRFP This study
STY50 MATahis4-401 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-52 HOL1-1 suc2::LEU2 33
MLY95 STY50 pJK90 18
MLY90 STY50 pJK90-NCE102(1-519 bp) This study
MLY91 STY50 pJK90-NCE102(1-438 bp) This study
MLY92 STY50 pJK90-NCE102(1-282 bp) This study
MLY93 STY50 pJK90-NCE102(1-189 bp) This study
MLY94 STY50 pJK90-NCE102(1-84 bp) This study
MLY100 BY4741; YIplac211-NCE102(1-438 bp)-GFP This study
MLY46 BY4741; YIplac211-NCE102-GFP This study
MLY105 GYS90; YIplac128-NCE102(1-438 bp) This study
MLY106 GYS90; YIplac128-NCE102(1-501 bp) This study

Construction of overexpression and tagging plasmids.

S. cerevisiae genes NCE102 and FHN1 (YGR131W) and S. pombe gene fhn1 (SPBC1685.13) were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA using the following primers (F and R for forward and reverse, respectively): NCE102-F (ATATAAGCTTATAATGCTAGCCCTAGC), NCE102-R (ATTACTCGAGACTTGGGAAATGGTT), FHN1-F (AGCATCTAGAATAATAAATGCTATCAG), FHN1-R (AGTAGGATCCAACCTGGGAAATTGT), S.pombe-fhn1-F (CCCAAAGCTTATGGTTGGAATCAG), S.pombe-fhn1-R (AAAAGGATCCAACGGCAGACATGAC). Resulting fragments were cloned into plasmid pVT100U-mRFP, which was constructed as follows. The monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) gene including an upstream MluI restriction site, the linker region, the 3′ untranslated region (UTR), and a downstream MfeI site was amplified by PCR from pmRFPkanMX using the primers KM33 (ATATACGCGTTGGAGCAGGGGCGGGTGCCTCCTCCGAGGACGTC; F) and JST86 (AAAAAACAATTGCAGGCATTTGCTCGGCAT; R). The PCR product was ligated as an MluI-MfeI fragment into pVT100U (2μm URA3 AmpR) (35) and transformed into Escherichia coli for amplification.

To express 3′-terminally truncated versions of NCE102, the genomic sequence was amplified using the primer ML23 (GTGTTTGTTACGCATGCAAGCTTGATATCGAAATGCTAGCCCTAGCTGATAAC), ML47 (ATATGGATCCTTAAACACCGACTTGGCCAGTTC; NCE1021-167), or ML48 (ATATGGATCCTTAGATCATGTTGAAAACAGACATC; NCE1021–146). The PCR products were inserted as HindIII-BamHI fragments into integrative plasmids YIplac128 and YIplac211-GFP (13, 15). Linearization of these plasmids with BcuI within the NCE102 gene targets integration in wild-type S. cerevisiae. In the case of YIplac128-NCE1021-167 and YIplac128-NCE1021–146, the cells were subsequently transformed using YIplac211-CAN1-GFP (15) linearized by BcuI.

Isolation of crude membranes.

Early logarithmic cells (100 optical density at 600 nm [OD600] units) were washed twice by 10 mM NaN3/NaF buffer to block endocytosis and resuspended in ice-cold TNE-I buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM EDTA), supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 4 μM leupeptin, and 2 μM pepstatin). To isolate crude membranes, the cells were broken with glass beads in a FastPrep instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Unbroken cells and larger cell debris were removed by two-step low-speed centrifugation (500 × g and 1,200 × g, 5 min each) in an Eppendorf centrifuge at 4°C. Crude membranes were pelleted at 20,000 × g for 75 min and resuspended in TNE-I buffer.

Cloning and analysis for topology determination.

Topology analysis was performed as described by Kim et al. (18). To amplify and clone 3′-truncated versions of the NCE102 gene into pJK90 (19), the following PCR primers were used (all primers contain a homologous region for in vivo ligation into pJK90): ML23 (F primer, see above) and R primers TGGTCTAGAGGTGTAACCACTTGAGTTCTTAGGGACTTGGGAAATGGTTGGAAC (ML24; amplification of all 519 bp of NCE102, excluding the stop codon), TGGTCTAGAGGTGTAACCACTTGAGTTCTTAGGGATCATGTTGAAAACAGACATC (ML25; amplification of 438 bp of NCE102), TGGTCTAGAGGTGTAACCACTTGAGTTCTTAGGTCTGATACCAACGGCCAACAC (ML26; amplification of 282 bp of NCE102), TGGTCTAGAGGTGTAACCACTTGAGTTCTTAGGTTCAATGAAGTTGGCAAAGAC (ML27; amplification of 189 bp of NCE102), and TGGTCTAGAGGTGTAACCACTTGAGTTCTTAGGTAACAACGAACTGATTAAACCG (ML28; amplification of 84 bp of NCE102). Genomic DNA was used as the template for PCR. For in vivo ligation, the vector pJK90 was linearized by digestion with SmaI and treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase to prevent religation. S. cerevisiae strain STY50 was transformed with the linearized vector and the full-length NCE102 or one of the shortened versions of NCE102 and selected on SD plates lacking uracil (SD −ura plates). Plasmids were isolated, retransformed in E. coli, and sequenced. To monitor histidinol dehydrogenase activity, successfully transformed yeast cells were grown on selective media (SD −His −ura supplemented with 6 mM histidinol). For endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (Endo H) assays, 10% SDS and 10% β-mercaptoethanol were added to 20 μl of crude membranes (protein concentration, 8 to 12 μg/μl) to a final concentration of 0.5% each. After incubation at 45°C for 10 min, 88 μl of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.5, and 5.5 μl of 10% octylglucoside were added. The sample was split into two and incubated at 37°C either with 1 μl Endo H (gift from Ludwig Lehle, Regensburg, Germany) or with H2O as a control. After 2 h of incubation, 1 μl of Endo H or water, respectively, was added again, and the incubation continued for another 2 h. After centrifugation (20,000 × g for 5 min), the supernatant was analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Confocal microscopy.

Living yeast cells cultured in SD medium (see Fig. 1 and 3) (log phase; OD600 of 0.5 to 1.0) were immobilized by a thin film of 1% agarose in SD medium and observed. Cells cultured in YPD (see Fig. 4) (overnight cultures) were washed briefly in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.3; KPi), immobilized by a thin film of 1% agarose in KPi, and observed. Specimens were viewed using an LSM510-META confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) with a 100× PlanApochromat oil immersion objective (numerical aperture [NA] = 1.4). Fluorescence signals of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and mRFP (excitation, 488 nm [Ar laser] and 561 nm [diode-pumped solid-state laser] [see Fig. 1] or 543 nm [He-Ne laser] [see Fig. 4]) were detected using band-pass 505- to 550-nm and long-pass 580-nm emission filters. In double-labeling experiments, sequential scanning was used to avoid any cross talk of fluorescence channels.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Nce102-like proteins induce the accumulation of Can1 in MCC patches. (A) S. cerevisiae proteins Nce102 and Fhn1 (product of YGR131W) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe protein fhn1 were aligned using ClustalW 2.0 (22). In the nce102Δ mutant of S. cerevisiae, Can1-GFP was coexpressed either with an empty plasmid (B) or with vectors coding for S. cerevisiae Nce102-mRFP (C) and Fhn1-mRFP (D) and S. pombe fhn1-mRFP (E). Note the homogenous distribution of Can1-GFP in panel B and its focal appearance in panels C to E. Bar, 5 μm.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The C-terminally truncated version of Nce102 is unable to sequester Can1 into MCC. Plasma membrane distributions of Can1-GFP in the wild type (A) and NCE102 deletion mutant (B) were compared to that in the cells expressing the C-terminally truncated versions of Nce102, Nce1021–146 (C) and Nce1021-167 (D), under the control of the natural promoter. Surface confocal sections and central confocal cross sections are presented. Bar, 5 μm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The C-terminally truncated Nce102 does not localize to MCC. The plasma membrane distribution of C-terminally truncated Nce1021–146 (A) tagged with GFP and that of the full-length Nce102-GFP (B) are shown on surface confocal sections (left) and central confocal cross sections (right). Note the absence of a characteristic MCC pattern in panel A. Bar, 5 μm.

Preparation of freeze fracture replicas and electron microscopy.

Cells from overnight culture were harvested by mild centrifugation (1,500 × g for 1 min) and washed in KPi buffer (pH 5.5). A 2-μl aliquot of the concentrated cell suspension was loaded onto a gold carrier and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. The sample was cut with a cold knife (≤−185°C), etched for 4 min (−97°C; pressure ≤ 1.3 × 10−5 Pa) in a CFE-50 freeze-etch unit (Cressington, Watford, United Kingdom), shadowed (1 nm Pt/C, 45°; 10 nm C, 90°), and cleaned in fresh 70% H2SO4 for 16 h (30). Freeze fracture micrographs (see Fig. 5) were acquired using a cooled slow-scan charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Tvips; Tietz, Gauting, Münich, Germany) mounted on a Philips CM 12 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Netherlands) operated at 120 kV.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The C-terminally truncated version of Nce102 is unable to form furrow-like invaginations of the plasma membrane. The fine structures of the plasma membrane in wild-type (A)- and C-terminally truncated Nce1021–146-expressing cells (B and C) were compared on freeze-etched replicas. MCC domains were marked (arrowheads). Instead of invaginations (A), a flat membrane was found in cells containing the incomplete Nce102 protein (B). Frequently, smooth, elongated areas could be detected in the membrane surface (insert in panel B). Only occasionally could shallow invaginations be recognized, too (C). Regions magnified in inserts are highlighted by frames. Bar, 1 μm.

RESULTS

Nce102 homologs share Nce102 function in plasma membrane organization.

Phylogenetically, furrow-like invaginations of the yeast plasma membrane represent a highly conserved structure (reviewed by Stradalova et al. [32]). Proteins sharing a significant homology with Nce102, a protein shown to be necessary for the final step of the formation of furrows as well as of MCC patches in S. cerevisiae, are found in various species of Ascomycota. BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) analysis (2) reveals more than 40 different Nce102 orthologs. We tested whether the molecular function of promoting the localization of specific transporters in the MCC/furrows is conserved among these Nce102-like proteins.

In the genome of S. cerevisiae, open reading frame (ORF) YGR131W codes for one of the closest Nce102 homologs (Fig. 1A). Ygr131w shows 55% identity (68% similarity) to Nce102, and its overexpression complements the Nce102 deletion. In the plasma membrane of the nce102Δ strain, Can1-GFP is distributed homogenously (16). When overexpressed in nce102Δ cells, Ygr131w-mRFP not only accumulates in MCC patches (16) but also induces the accumulation of Can1-GFP in this plasma membrane compartment. Due to the ability of YGR131W to replace this NCE102 function, we named the gene FHN1 (functional homolog of NCE102) (Fig. 1B to D). Since FHN1 is not able to compensate for the NCE102 deletion when expressed under the control of its own promoter, we conclude that its inherent expression level is not sufficient.

The replacement of Nce102 function in the plasma membrane organization could also be observed when a heterologous NCE102-like gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the uncharacterized ORF SPBC1685.13 (31% identity and 52% similarity to S. cerevisiae NCE102) (Fig. 1A) was expressed in the S. cerevisiae nce102Δ mutant (Fig. 1E). Similarly to Fhn1, the gene product of SPBC1685.13 was targeted to MCC and induced significant accumulation of Can1-GFP in this compartment. Therefore, we named the gene fhn1 (functional homolog of S. cerevisiae NCE102). Even though the primary structure of Fhn1 shows a relatively low degree of homology with Nce102 (see alignment of NCE102, FHN1, and fhn1), it complements the Nce102 deletion. We concluded therefore that the function of Nce102 in plasma membrane organization is probably widely conserved throughout Ascomycota.

Membrane topology of Nce102.

Large conserved parts of Nce102 correspond to highly hydrophobic regions of the protein molecule. According to hydropathy analysis tools (e.g., TMHMM2.0; http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/) (21), the protein is predicted to possess 4 transmembrane helices, with N and C termini oriented toward the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) during protein synthesis (Fig. 2A, model I) and outside the cell once it reaches the plasma membrane.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Nce102 topology. (A) Predicted (I) and experimentally determined (II, III, and IV) topology alternatives for the Nce102 molecule. Sites used for the synthesis of Nce102 truncated versions are depicted. (B) Growth of his4Δ cells expressing truncated Nce102s fused to the HA/Suc2/His4C reporter construct was tested on histidine (control; left) and histidinol (His4 substrate; right). Positive control, pJK90-OST4-HA-SUC2-HIS4C (19); negative control, empty vector. (C) Glycosylation of the reporter can occur only if it faces the ER lumen. Total membrane fractions from strains expressing fusion proteins as described in Materials and Methods were either treated (+) or not treated (−) with Endo H. After SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, the fusion proteins were detected by anti-HA antibody. Cleavage of N-linked glycans was manifested by a shift of the molecular mass. (D) Glycosylation status of Nce102 tested with the use of shortened topology reporters. The positive control (Wbp1, top), L70N Nce102 mutant (middle, left lanes), and Nce102 molecules with shortened Suc2 fragments (middle, right lanes, and bottom) were compared (see text for details).

To determine the topology of Nce102 experimentally, we employed a technology of a hemagglutinin (HA)/Suc2/His4C chimeric protein tag as a topology reporter (7, 18), a technique widely used for membrane protein topology determination. We constructed vectors coding for Nce102 C-terminally truncated after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th predicted transmembrane domain (at amino acid L28, E63, R94, or I146, respectively) (Fig. 2A, model I). The full-length Nce102 and the individual truncated versions described above were C-terminally tagged with HA/Suc2/His4C and expressed in an auxotrophic his4 strain (7, 9, 18). The ability of the histidinol dehydrogenase (His4C) to convert histidinol to histidine enables a histidine-auxotrophic strain with the reporter located in the cytosol to grow on media lacking histidine but supplemented with histidinol. Invertase (Suc2) and His4C contain eight and four, respectively, consensus acceptor sites for N-linked glycosylation that could be glycosylated only if the reporter is translocated to the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. The HA tag is included to allow identification of the expressed fusion proteins by Western blotting.

Anti-HA antibody detected the fusion proteins in crude membranes prepared from all five strains, each expressing one of the truncated versions of NCE102 or the full-length NCE102 fused to the reporter. The shift to higher molecular masses of the fusion proteins containing amino acids 1 to 28, 1 to 63, and 1 to 94, which can be abolished by Endo H treatment, proved their glycosylation (Fig. 2C). Therefore, the C termini of these three constructs were exposed to the ER lumen during their biosynthesis, and consequently, in the plasma membrane, amino acids 28, 63, and 94 should be oriented outside the cell. No molecular mass shift or effect of Endo H treatment was detected in strains bearing the full-length (amino acids 1 to 173) version or the version consisting of amino acids 1 to 146, indicating thus that the stretch of amino acids 146 to 173 was oriented to the cytoplasm (Fig. 2C). This conclusion was also confirmed by the growth on histidinol of the histidine-auxotrophic strains bearing fusion constructs with the full-length or truncated (1 to 146) protein, indicating the cytoplasmic orientation of the C terminus (Fig. 2B).

These results indicate that the Nce102 protein contains only two transmembrane helices (Fig. 2A, model II), corresponding to the first (N-terminal) and last hydrophobic regions in the Nce102 molecule. The middle large hydrophobic region in this interpretation does not span the membrane. A precaution has to be taken is to consider the possibility that the bulky (125-kDa) topology reporter attached to this small (19-kDa) protein and its even smaller fragments could interfere with both their trafficking and folding. However, as shown in Fig. 3, at least the largest Nce102-derived chimeras are targeted properly to the plasma membrane. To minimize the danger of artificial misfolding, we further checked the Nce102 topology by inserting a shortened Suc2 fragment, D81 to Y133 or V67 to D148, into the intact protein. They were inserted after P64Q; including short additional amino acid stretches was thought to possibly prevent potential interference with the putative TMD 2. In another construct, L70 in Nce102 was exchanged for N to generate a glycosylation site within the loop exposed to the ER lumen in both the computer-predicted topology (model I) and the Suc2/His4C-based experimentally assessed topology above (model II; in this case, however, the orientation of the whole molecule is inverted [Fig. 2A]). The proteins were immunodetected with specific anti-Nce102 antibody. ER protein Wbp1 was used as a positive control for Endo H digestion. As shown in Fig. 2D, the Endo H digestion was not accompanied by a shift in molecular weight with either of the tested proteins, while a clear shift was detected in the control (Wbp1). These results show that the Suc2 reporter was not glycosylated in the ER lumen. The putative model of 4 TMDs with N and C termini inside the cell has, therefore, not definitely been excluded, and model III of Fig. 2A has still to be considered as possibly correct.

The C terminus of Nce102 is necessary to target MCC-specific transporters into MCC.

Besides the hydrophobic regions, also the C terminus is highly conserved among the Nce102 homologs. We tested the physiological significance of this highly conserved C terminus in targeting Nce102 to MCC and/or in the gathering (concentrating) of other MCC residents.

The total C-terminal part following the last predicted transmembrane helix, consisting of 27 amino acids, was removed from Nce102, and this truncated version (Nce1021–146) was expressed in a wild-type background under the control of an endogenous promoter. In the resulting strain, Can1-GFP was distributed homogenously as in the nce102Δ background, which means that Nce1021–146 did not substitute for the Can1 accumulation-related function of Nce102 (Fig. 3A to C). A deletion of the 6 terminal amino acids only (Nce1021-167) resulted in an identical effect (Fig. 3D). Expression levels of the full-length protein and its C-terminally truncated proteins were mutually comparable (data not shown). As shown by localization of GFP fusion proteins, the two truncated Nce102 versions reached the plasma membrane but, in contrast to the full-length molecule, were distributed homogenously (Fig. 4). These results document that the stretch of the very last 6 amino acids of Nce102 is responsible for directing this protein to MCC patches.

The C terminus of Nce102 is necessary for the formation of the plasma membrane invaginations.

As previously observed in freeze-etch preparations of plasma membrane replicas, the full deletion of NCE102 results in a lack of furrow-like invaginations (32). We therefore tested whether the C-terminal truncation of the Nce102 protein has a similar effect. For direct comparability with the results obtained by confocal microscopy we used the strains expressing NCE102-GFP and NCE1021–146-GFP for replica preparation. In total, 111 cells expressing full-length NCE102-GFP and 33 cells expressing NCE1021–146-GFP were analyzed. While all cells expressing the full-length NCE102 gene formed furrows, only in 3 out of 33 analyzed Nce1021–146-containing cells could shallow, premature furrow-like invaginations be identified. The remaining 90% of cells exhibited flat plasma membranes devoid of the typical furrow-like invagination pattern. Flat, smooth, elongated areas with surface densities comparable to that observed in furrows of wild-type cells were detected instead (Fig. 5). This remarkable change in the plasma membrane morphology was virtually identical to the phenotype previously observed for the nce102Δ strain (32). We conclude that, after its C-terminal part had been deleted, Nce102 lost its function in formation of furrows.

DISCUSSION

So far, we have documented nine proteins sharing the MCC localization: four members of the Sur7 family (Sur7, Ynl149c, Fmp45, and Ylr414c), three proton symporters (Can1, Fur4, and Tat2), and Nce102, with its close homolog Fhn1 (15, 16, 25, 26). Among those, no general MCC targeting sequence was revealed. Our findings rather support a step-by-step mechanism for MCC formation as suggested previously: (i) Pil1-driven assembly of planar membrane domains (primary MCC patches) containing Sur7 family proteins; (ii) recruitment of specific lipids, Nce102, and transporters into these domains; and (iii) lipid- and/or protein-mediated invagination of the MCC membrane (for details see references 27 and 32). Previously we showed that Nce102 directs the proton transporters into MCC patches, where they are protected against untimely turnover (16). In this study we document that the mechanism of plasma membrane domain formation and this MCC function is probably conserved through the largest phylum of fungi, the Ascomycota. This conclusion is based on the observation that, by expressing one of the most distant Nce102 homologs coded by S. pombe fhn1, we were able to reconstitute the Can1-enriched MCC patches in the nce102Δ strain of S. cerevisiae.

The hydropathy plot of Nce102 revealed four potential membrane-spanning domains. This prediction of the membrane topology, however, does not seem to be correct, at least in the sense of the protein orientation. Using a combination of glycosylation and growth assays, we determined that the C terminus of Nce102 is oriented toward the cytoplasm, while in the predicted protein structure it is exposed to the cell exterior. Taking this observation into account, we consider three putative models of Nce102 accommodation in the plasma membrane (Fig. 2A, models II to IV). The first one (model II), assuming that the protein crosses the membrane only twice, is based on a set of experiments where the topology was determined using the entire HA/Suc2/His4C reporter. However, this tag is quite bulky (125 kDa) compared to the tested Nce102 fragments, and thus it is possible that, during the membrane insertion, the fusion proteins do not fold correctly. On the other hand, it is worthwhile mentioning that, using the same strategy as that described above, we confirmed unambiguously the tetraspan topology of another protein residing in MCC, Sur7 (20; V. Stradalova, unpublished results). To obviate the interference of the bulky HA/Suc2/His4C reporter with the membrane insertion of Nce102-derived peptides, much smaller Suc2 fragments (6 and 9.3 kDa) were tested as glycosylation reporters. As evident from Fig. 2D, in this case the C-terminal reporter on fragment Nce1021-63 is not glycosylated, which indicates that the hydrophilic loop following amino acid 63 is not exposed to the ER lumen and therefore probably faces the cytoplasm when the Nce102 protein is incorporated into the plasma membrane. The same holds for a newly created glycosylation site generated at amino acid 70. Conclusions from these results are summarized in topology model III in Fig. 2A. Neither of the two models, however, might be fully fitting. It is noteworthy that the first predicted TMD in Nce102 consists of 18 amino acids only. Usually, at least 23 amino acid residues are required for spanning the yeast plasma membrane (31, 37). However, 7 of 10 amino acid residues of the cytoplasmic N terminus are of positive hydropathy index, and the possibility that they might be involved in protein embedding cannot be excluded. The first extracellular stretch in model III consists of 12 highly polar amino acids, while the second loop, the internal one, contains only 9 amino acids, 7 of which are nonpolar. The other two amino acids are prolines, which are well documented to influence the conformation of, e.g., helical regions (1, 24, 39). Helices containing proline have a pronounced kink, with bending of the helical axis of approximately 30° away from the side with the proline residue (38). Regarding all our results and the specific features of Nce102, we suggest topology model IV, where the proposed TMDs 2 and 3 do not span the plasma membrane but are inserted into the outer leaflet of the membrane. Due to its high hydrophobicity, the short 9-amino-acid stretch located between potential TMDs 2 and 3 might be incorporated into the lipid bilayer as well. In this case, the whole stretch of amino acids 40 to 95 could be embedded in the plasma membrane and the presence of the prolines might be involved in bending this helix.

It is plausible to speculate that these specific features of the Nce102 primary structure endow Nce102 with a certain topological flexibility, which might be of physiological relevance. In this context it is interesting to refer to the recent studies of Fröhlich et al. (10), where Nce102 has been proposed to act as a sensor for sphingolipids, regulating the appearance of the MCC pattern via phosphorylation of Pil1, a cytosolic protein accumulated beneath the MCC patches. Indeed, the involvement of Nce102 in processes including changes of the plasma membrane lipid composition is indicated by its increased expression reported in several screening studies looking for responses to environmental changes, like heat stress, oxidative and osmotic shocks, nitrogen source depletion, diauxic shift, transition to invasive growth, and introduction of various toxic substances (8, 11, 12, 34). The monitoring and transferring of signals from the environment may be due to changes in Nce102 topology, e.g., in the positioning of originally proposed TMDs 2 and 3. Our results document that the N and C termini of Nce102 face the cytosol, and we favor the possibility that the middle part of the molecule is incorporated in or tightly attached to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane.

We identified a short C-terminal motif (PTISQV), the absence of which resulted in a loss of Nce102 function in the formation of MCC patches as well as of the plasma membrane invaginations (Fig. 3 to 5). Among the Nce102-like proteins resulting from our BLAST search, the motif is strongly (proline, 100% of 42 sequences analyzed; glutamine and valine, >95%) conserved in Ascomycota (data not shown). Our data show that even one of the most distant variants of this motif (PvmSaV [lowercase letters refer to amino acids not conserved in the S. cerevisiae version of the Nce102 protein]) in S. pombe Fhn1 is sufficient to accomplish the Nce102 function. Apparently, the C-terminal part of Nce102 is required for the local accumulation of the protein within Pil1-assembled domains (Fig. 4). In principle, two different mechanisms of membrane bending following this accumulation can be suggested. (i) The consequent transporter/sterol accumulation in MCC patches (15) promotes positive membrane curvature (32). Plasma membrane curvature caused by intercalation of ergosterol into the plane would play a key role in this case. However, lipids with high spontaneous curvature (like sterols) were shown to exhibit rather weak curvature preferences when inserted into membranes (17). (ii) It is possible that the central hydrophobic region of the Nce102 molecule is embedded into the outer layer of the plasma membrane (Fig. 2A, model IV). It is known that a shallow insertion of small hydrophobic inclusions effectively induces membrane curvatures (5). A critical amount of Nce102 at the patches could, in this case, induce the membrane bending. Many other proteins involved in the organization of membrane microdomains, for example, caveolins, reticulons, and flotillins (reggies), contain at least one membrane-integrated, but not membrane-spanning domain, which, it has been suggested, adopts a hairpin structure (3).

Based on our ultrastructural studies, we suggest that Nce102 operates also as a structural protein in bending the plasma membrane, which, of course, involves also the effects of specific lipids in the plasma membrane region. The role of Nce102 in specific structure formation does not exclude the possibility that Nce102 has additional functions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to Ingrid Fuchs for technical assistance. We also thank Katerina Malinska from the Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Prague), for the construction of the pVTU100-mRFP plasmid and Sabine Strahl, University of Heidelberg, for technical advice.

>V.S., M.O., and J.M. were financially supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (projects 204/07/0133, 204/08/J024, and 204/09/1924), the Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the CR (KAN200520801), and by institutional grants (AVOZ50390703 and AV0Z50200510). M.L., G.G., W.T., A.K., and R.R. were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG projects TA 36/18–1, TH, and SFB699 Z2). This work was also financially supported by the German Fonds der chemischen Industrie.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 25 June 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altmann K.-H., Wojcik J., Vasquez M., Scheraga H. A. 1990. Helix-coil stability constants for the naturally occurring amino acids in water. XXIII. Proline parameters from random poly (hydroxybutylglutamine-co-L-proline). Biopolymers 30:107–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bauer M., Pelkmans L. 2006. A new paradigm for membrane-organizing and -shaping scaffolds. FEBS Lett. 580:5559–5564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brachmann C. B., Davies A., Cost G. J., Caputo E., Li J., Hieter P., Boeke J. D. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Campelo F., McMahon H. T., Kozlov M. M. 2008. The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins. Biophys. J. 95:2325–2339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cleves A. E., Cooper D. N., Barondes S. H., Kelly R. B. 1996. A new pathway for protein export in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 133:1017–1026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deak P. M., Wolf D. H. 2001. Membrane topology and function of Der3/Hrd1p as a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) involved in endoplasmic reticulum degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:10663–10669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.DeRisi J. L., Iyer V. R., Brown P.O. 1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science. 278:680–686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deshaies R. J., Schekman R. 1987. A yeast mutant defective at an early stage in import of secretory protein precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 105:633–645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fröhlich F., Moreira K., Aguilar P. S., Hubner N. C., Mann M., Walter P., Walther T. C. 2009. A genome-wide screen for genes affecting eisosomes reveals Nce102 function in sphingolipid signaling. J. Cell Biol. 185:1227–1242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gasch A. P., Spellnam P. T., Kao C. M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M. B., Storz G., Botstein D., Brown P. O. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:4241–4257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gasch A. P., Huang M., Metzner S., Botstein D., Elledge S. J., Brown P. O. 2001. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2987–3003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gietz R. D., Sugino A. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gietz R. D., Woods R. A. 2002. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 350:87–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grossmann G., Opekarová M., Malinsky J., Weig-Meckl I., Tanner W. 2007. Membrane potential governs lateral segregation of plasma membrane proteins and lipids in yeast. EMBO J. 26:1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grossmann G., Malinsky J., Stahlschmidt W., Loibl M., Weig-Meckl I., Frommer W. B., Opekarová M., Tanner W. 2008. Plasma membrane microdomains regulate turnover of transport proteins in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 183:1075–1088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kamal M. M., Mills D., Grzybek M., Howard J. 2009. Coupling between membrane curvature and lipid shape: measurement of the curvature preference of fluorescently labeled phospholipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:22245–22250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim H., Melén K., von Heijne G. 2003. Topology models for 37 Saccharomyces cerevisiae membrane proteins based on C-terminal reporter fusions and predictions. J. Biol. Chem. 278:10208–10213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim H., Yan Q., von Heijne G., Caputo G. A., Lennarz W. J. 2003. Determination of the membrane topology of Ost4p and its subunit interactions in the oligosaccharyltransferase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:7460–7464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim H., Melén K., Österberg M., von Heijne G. 2006. A global topology map of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae membrane proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:11142–11147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E. L. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305:567–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Larkin M. A., Blackshields G., Brown N. P., Chenna R., McGettigan P. A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I. M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Higgins D. G. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Luo G., Gruhler A., Liu Y., Jensen O. N., Dickson R. C. 2008. The sphingolipid long-chain base-Pkh1/2-Ypk1/2 signaling pathway regulates eisosome assembly and turnover. J. Biol. Chem. 283:10433–10444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.MacArthur M. W., Thornton J. M. 1991. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 218:397–412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malínská K., Malinsky J., Opekarová M., Tanner W. 2003. Visualization of protein compartmentation within the plasma membrane of living yeast cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 14:4427–4436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Malínská K., Malinsky J., Opekarová M., Tanner W. 2004. Distribution of Can1p into stable domains reflects lateral protein segregation within the plasma membrane of living S. cerevisiae cells. J. Cell Sci. 117:6031–6041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Malinsky J., Opekarová M., Tanner W. 14April2010. The lateral compartmentation of the yeast plasma membrane. Yeast doi:10.1002/yea.1772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moor H., Mühlethaler K. 1963. Fine structure in frozen-etched yeast cells. J. Cell Biol. 17:609–628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moreira K. E., Walther T. C., Aguilar P. S., Walter P. 2009. Pil1 controls eisosome biogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:809–818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rachel R., Wyschkony I., Riehl S., Huber H. 2002. The ultrastructure of Ignicoccus: evidence for a novel outer membrane and for intracellular vesicle budding in an archaeon. Archaea 1:9–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rayner J. C., Pelham H. R. B. 1997. Transmembrane domain-dependent sorting of proteins to the ER and plasma membrane in yeast. EMBO J. 16:1832–1841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stradalova V., Stahlschmidt W., Grossmann G., Blažíková M., Rachel R., Tanner W., Malinsky J. 2009. Furrow-like invaginations of the yeast plasma membrane correspond to membrane compartment of Can1 (MCC). J. Cell Sci. 122:2887–2894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Strahl-Bolsinger S., Scheinost A. 1999. Transmembrane topology of Pmt1p, a member of an evolutionary conserved family of protein O-mannosyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 274:9068–9075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Suzuki C., Hori Y., Kashiwagi Y. 2003. Screening and characterization of transposon-insertion mutants in a pseudohyphal strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 20:407–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vernet T., Dignard D., Thomas D.Y. 1987. A family of yeast expression vectors containing the phage f1 intergenic region. Gene 52:225–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Walther T. C., Brickner J. H., Aguilar P. S., Bernales S., Pantoja C., Walter P. 2006. Eisosomes mark static sites of endocytosis. Nature 439:998–1003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Watson R. T., Pessin J. E. 2001. Transmembrane domain length determines intracellular membrane compartment localization of syntaxins 3, 4, and 5. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 281:C215–C223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Woolfson D. N., Williams D. H. 1990. The influence of proline residues on alpha-helical structure. FEBS Lett. 277:185–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yun R. H., Anderson A., Hermans J. 1991. Proline in alpha-helix: stability and conformation studied by dynamics simulation. Proteins 10:219–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eukaryotic Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES