Skip to main content
Neuroepidemiology logoLink to Neuroepidemiology
. 2010 Jun 3;35(1):66–71. doi: 10.1159/000311012

Nationwide Population-Based Epidemiological Study of Myasthenia Gravis in Taiwan

Chien-Hsu Lai a, Hung-Fu Tseng b,*
PMCID: PMC2919433  PMID: 20523074

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology and medical expenses of myasthenia gravis (MG) in Taiwan.

Methods

Cases of MG were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database with corresponding codes of the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9), from January 2000 to December 2007. Age- and sex-specific incidences were estimated by dividing the incidence number by population data obtained from the Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior.

Results

During the study period, 5,211 cases were identified. The incidence ratio of males to females was 0.68. The average annual incidence rate was 2.1/100,000. MG occurred in all age groups with a higher incidence in older individuals and the lowest incidence in the 10- to 14-year-olds for both sexes. Among the 5,211 cases, 615 (12%) had a neoplasm of the thymus. The prevalence increased steadily during the study period from 8.4/100,000 in 2000 to 14.0/ 100,000 in 2007.

Conclusions

This is the first population-based epidemiological study of MG in Taiwan. The incidence rate and prevalence were higher than in most published studies, especially in old age groups.

Key Words: Myasthenia gravis, incidence/prevalence; Medical expenses; Thymus disorders; Taiwan, epidemiology

Introduction

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common neuromuscular junction disorder, characterized by a fluctuating degree and variable combination of weakness in ocular, bulbar, limb and respiratory muscles [1]. In the majority of patients, the maximum level of severity is reached during the first 3 years. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors and corticosteroids are the cornerstone in treating MG with satisfactory symptomatic improvement or complete remission in most cases [2].

There have been more than 50 population-based epidemiological studies of MG since the 1950s [3]. The majority of these studies were done in Europe or North America. In some large populations, surveys have been incomplete (e.g. in China and sub-Saharan Africa) or lacking (e.g. in South America and Australia). The weighted mean prevalence increased gradually from 22.2 per million in the 1950s to 93.9 per million in the 1990s [4]. The high prevalence of previously unrecognized positive acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR-Ab) in those older than 75 years suggests that MG might be substantially underdiagnosed in the elderly [5] or that the incidence of late-onset MG in general may be increasing [6], possibly both. A higher than expected incidence of MG in the elderly was found in a 10-year (from 1991 to 2000) prospective study of MG in Spain [7]. An increased incidence of elderly-onset MG was also noted in Japan [8]. With an aging population and advancement in immune-modulating therapy, the epidemiology of MG may be different than before, and therefore the population-based epidemiology of MG needs further investigation.

The population-based epidemiology of MG has not been reported in Taiwan before. We have previously established the population-based epidemiological data of motor neuron diseases [9], Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, multiple sclerosis [10] and Wilson's disease [11] from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). At least 215 studies utilizing the same database have been published. Here, we present the data of MG from the same database.

Methods

The National Health Insurance (NHI) program was initiated in Taiwan in 1995. Through risk sharing, the public has received comprehensive medical care such as preventive medicine, clinical care, hospitalization, resident care and social rehabilitation. According to the NHI Annual Statistics Report compiled by the Bureau of the NHI, the NHI coverage rate was 96.1% in 2000 and increased steadily to 98.6% in 2007.

The population in Taiwan during 2000–2007 was stable, ranging from 22.28 to 22.96 million. Population-based data were obtained by using the annual outpatient claims and hospitalization discharge claims for 2000–2007 from the Bureau of the NHI. Initially, the cases of MG were identified by all the corresponding codes of the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9), in the 358 series. 99.4% of them were coded 358.0. Therefore, only ICD-9 code 358.0 was selected in the following calculation. The ICD-9 code for ocular MG and generalized MG is the same. Both ocular MG and generalized MG were included.

Outpatient claim files include an encrypted personal identification number, date of birth, date of service, relevant department, expenses and first 3 ICD-9 codes. The hospitalization discharge claims contain data from both acute and long-term stay hospitals. The data of the hospitalization discharge claims include an encrypted personal identification number, date of birth, length of stay, relevant department, expenses and first 5 ICD-9 codes. Multiple outpatient and hospitalization discharge claims with the same personal identification number were counted once so that only the incidence of the disease was counted. The prevalence was calculated by dividing the number of total cases for each year by the corresponding total population.

Averaged age- and sex-specific incidence rates were calculated by dividing the number of new cases in each age and sex group by the age- and sex-specific population, followed by averaging these data from 2001 to 2007. Data of these populations were derived from the Ministry of the Interior, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. Calculations were carried out using SPSS version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA) and Microsoft Excel, 2003 edition.

MG is included in the list of serious accidents and diseases (SAD) published by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. The approval of the SAD status is subject to evaluation and review by the Bureau of the NHI. The application of SAD is limited by board-certified specialists of a related discipline. Patients with SAD certificates are eligible for exemption from insurance premiums and copayments. Therefore, SAD patient data are highly accurate and reliable. Because of the low incidence, MG is difficult and impractical for an epidemiological approach by field community studies. The NHIRD with SAD patient data is a great resource for studying the epidemiology of MG. In this study, all of the retrieved outpatient and hospitalization data were verified by linking the encrypted personal identification number with the SAD certificate. Medical expenses were limited to those of the SAD. Confidentiality assurances were addressed by following the data regulations of the NHI Bureau. The NHIRD consists of encrypted secondary data released to the public for research purposes. Institutional review board approval was waived for this study.

Results

Sex-specific incidence and prevalence are shown in detail in table 1.

Table 1.

Incidence and prevalence of MG in Taiwan

Total population, × 106
New cases
Total cases
Incidence rate per 105/year
Prevalence per 105
M/F ratio of incidence
F M T F M T F M T F M T F M T
2000 10.9 11.4 22.3 1,200 672 1,875 11.0 5.9 8.4
2001 11.0 11.4 22.4 273 191 466 1,283 738 2,025 2.5 1.7 2.1 11.7 6.5 9.0 0.67
2002 11.0 11.5 22.5 297 182 484 1,421 826 2,255 2.7 1.6 2.1 12.9 7.2 10.0 0.59
2003 11.1 11.5 22.6 268 196 474 1,538 920 2,475 2.4 1.7 2.1 13.9 8.0 10.9 0.70
2004 11.1 11.5 22.7 265 178 451 1,643 986 2,645 2.4 1.5 2.0 14.7 8.5 11.7 0.65
2005 11.2 11.6 22.8 272 195 467 1,755 1,065 2,820 2.4 1.7 2.1 15.7 9.2 12.4 0.69
2006 11.3 11.6 22.9 298 195 493 1,916 1,120 3,036 2.6 1.7 2.2 17.0 9.7 13.3 0.64
2007 11.3 11.6 23.0 292 209 501 1,996 1,209 3,205 2.6 1.8 2.2 17.6 10.4 14.0 0.70

F = Female; M = maie; T = total.

In total, there were 5,211 cases, including 3,165 females, 2,018 males (new cases during 2001–2007 plus total cases in 2000) and 28 cases without gender data: 3 in 2000, 2 in 2001, 5 in 2002, 10 in 2003, 8 in 2004 and none in 2005–2007. Therefore, the total case numbers were not equal to the sum of female and male case numbers in 2000–2004. The average incidence ratio of males to females during 2001–2007 was 0.68. The annual incidence rate ranged from 2.4 to 2.7 and 1.5 to 1.8/100,000 for females and males, respectively. The overall annual incidence rate during 2001–2007 was 2.1/100,000. Confidence intervals are not reported because these are national population data, not a sample. Age-specific incidences during 2001–2007 are listed in table 2. Detailed age-specific population information for Taiwan used in the calculation of age-specific incidences in this study can be found on the website of the Ministry of the Interior, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/english/year.asp).

Table 2.

Averaged age-specific incidence of MG in Taiwan during 2001–2007

Age group Cases
Averagec incidence per 105/year
F/M incidence rate p value
F M T F M T
0–4 50 27 77 1.21 0.60 0.89 0.003
5–9 43 30 73 0.84 0.54 0.69 n.s.
10–14 23 19 42 0.42 0.32 0.37 n.s.
15–19 63 33 96 1.14 0.55 0.83 0.001
20–24 146 61 211 2.27 0.90 1.60 <0.001
25–29 173 82 265 2.59 1.19 1.95 <0.001
30–34 161 83 249 2.54 1.28 1.94 <0.001
35–39 178 109 291 2.73 1.63 2.21 <0.001
40–44 181 117 298 2.74 1.73 2.23 <0.001
45–49 205 146 351 3.32 2.34 2.83 0.001
50–54 173 114 287 3.28 2.17 2.72 0.001
55–59 125 119 245 3.52 3.41 3.48 n.s.
60–64 112 97 209 3.93 3.59 3.77 n.s.
65–69 110 109 219 4.31 4.65 4.47 n.s.
70–74 107 87 194 5.28 4.13 4.69 n.s.
75–79 73 84 157 4.98 4.86 4.92 n.s.
≥80 42 29 72 2.90 2.04 2.51 n.s.

F = Female; M = male; T = total; n.s. = not significant.

The incidence was lowest in the 10- to 14-year age group and higher in the older age groups for both sexes. The incidence was significantly higher in females than in males in age groups of 0–4 and 15–54 years. The prevalence increased steadily from 8.4/100,000 in 2000 to 14.0/100,000 in 2007.

The 5,211 patients utilized 174,876 outpatient services and 4,976 inpatient services. On average, each patient utilized 8.6 outpatient services and 0.24 hospitalizations per year. The average length of stay in an acute ward was 15.6 days. The majority of the medical services were provided by department of neurology (77.3%). Other departments that provided more than 1% of the services included departments of pediatrics (4.3%), Chinese medicine (3.9%), internal medicine (3.5%), family medicine (1.8%), ophthalmology (1.8%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (1.5%) and surgery (1.1%).

The average expense was 1,616 New Taiwan Dollars (NTD, 1 USD = 30–34 NTD) for each outpatient service and 118,514 NTD for each hospitalization. The detailed annual expenses and numbers of outpatient visits and hospitalizations are listed in table 3. The medical expenses only represented SAD-related direct costs. Indirect costs, such as time lost from work or disability, were not included. Direct medical cost not paid by the NHI, such as that for a single room, was not included either.

Table 3.

Medical expenses of MG in Taiwan

Year Number of outpatient services Sum of outpatient expenses, NTD Average expense per outpatient service, NTD Number of inpatient services Sum of inpatient expenses, NTD Average expense per inpatient service, NTD Average of total yearly expenses per patient, NTD
2000 15,207 21,728,813 1,429 516 57,718,087 111,857 42,372
2001 17,110 24,122,669 1,410 508 54,752,072 107,780 38,950
2002 19,307 28,794,079 1,491 539 57,853,271 107,334 38,425
2003 19,549 32,677,873 1,672 593 79,914,665 134,763 45,492
2004 22,694 37,655,926 1,659 645 78,352,052 121,476 43,859
2005 25,111 38,666,583 1,540 695 90,523,313 130,249 45,812
2006 27,454 45,013,512 1,640 730 89,630,524 122,782 44,349
2007 28,444 53,882,037 1,894 750 80,981,698 107,976 42,079

Among these 5,211 cases, 615 (12%) had a concomitant diagnosis of neoplasm of the thymus. The top 20 common coexisting ICD-9 codes among these 174,876 outpatient and 4,976 inpatient services are shown in table 4. We also evaluated the coexisting frequency of various autoimmune diseases. In addition to systemic lupus erythematosus which ranked 19, 710.2 ‘sicca syndrome’ (747 services) and 714.0 ‘rheumatoid arthritis’ (661 services) were also relatively common.

Table 4.

Top 20 common coexisting ICD-9 codes

ICD-9 code Disease Frequency
401.9 Essential hypertension 12,199
465.9 Acute upper respiratory infections of unspecified site 7,905
250.00 Diabetes mellitus, type II, adult onset 5,902
729.1 Myalgia and myositis, unspecified 5,318
536.9 Unspecified functional disorder of stomach 5,042
164.0 Malignant neoplasm of thymus 3,965
460 Acute nasopharyngitis 3,942
780.52 Other insomnia 2,896
300.9 Unspecified neurotic disorder 2,628
401.1 Benign essential hypertension 2,555
784.0 Headache 2,487
300.00 Anxiety state 2,337
272.4 Other and unspecified hyperlipidemia 2,291
733.00 Osteoporosis, unspecified 2,247
212.6 Benign neoplasm of thymus 2,243
242.90 Thyrotoxicosis 2,108
780.4 Dizziness and giddiness 2,026
780.50 Sleep disturbances, unspecified 1,822
710.0 Systemic lupus erythematosus 1,714
786.2 Cough 1,632

Discussion

The present study is not only the first population-based epidemiological study on MG in Taiwan, but also the largest epidemiological study that has ever been conducted on MG in the world, and one of very few with entire national data. The annual incidence rates were stable (2.0–2.2/100,000/year) throughout the study period. This might reflect the quality of the SAD data of the NHIRD as well as the stability of the disease.

Case ascertainment was based on clinical coding in the present study and may raise the question of diagnostic accuracy. However, in Taiwan's medical environment, we believe the diagnosis of MG is reliable in most cases due to the following reasons. First, an assay of AChR-Ab, which is present in 85% of individuals with MG [12,13], is available in Taiwan. Although no data on AChR-Ab are available in our database, AChR-Ab is almost routinely checked for patients with suspected MG in clinical practice. Second, single-fiber electromyography, which is the most sensitive diagnostic tool for MG, is available in many hospitals in Taiwan. It is positive in more than 95% of those with generalized MG and 90–95% of those with ocular MG [12,14]. In clinical practice in Taiwan, the patients with suspected MG without positive AChR-Ab are usually referred to hospitals with facilities for single-fiber electromyography. The patients can also directly visit medical centers for diagnosis and treatment without referral. Third, no matter the disease severity, MG is included in the list of SAD, which has economic factors rendering the data highly reliable as described in the Methods section.

There are also other limitations in the present study. The age of symptom onset was not available in the database. Although it is convenient and affordable to seek medical help in Taiwan, it is not always prompt for SAD approval, because SAD will not be approved until firm evidence has been obtained, and atypical symptoms in some MG patients make the diagnosis challenging. Therefore, the annual incidence of MG in this study represents the yearly number of new SAD approvals for MG, and the prevalence of MG represents the yearly number of total MG cases with approval of SAD. The age of age-specific incidence in the present study represents that of the confirmed diagnosis and was approved by SAD. The age approved by SAD is definitely older than that of symptom onset.

We modified the work of Poulas et al. [15] and reviewed epidemiological studies of MG done in the past (table 5). Compared with previous studies, a few features were noted in the present study, including the high annual incidence rate and prevalence. There is a trend of increasing incidence and prevalence over calendar time.

Table 5.

Epidemiological studies of MG in different countries

First author fear Region Cases Population Incidence per million/year Prevalence per million
Storm-Mathisen [16] 1912–1952 Norway 90 3,700,000 1 21
Garland [17] 1955 Yorkshire, UK 60 3,500,000 5 26
Giagheddu [18] 1961 Sardinia, Italy 110 1,500,000 2.6 7.7
Oosterhuis [19] 1965 Amsterdam, The Netherlands 73 850,000 3.1 53
Giagheddu [18] 1971 Sardinia, Italy 110 1,500,000 2.6 17.6
Pirskanen [20] 1976 Finland 264 4,700,000 n.a. 5.6
Storm-Mathisen [21] 1981 Norway 458 3,700,000 4 90
Phillips [22] 1984 Virginia, USA 112 550,000 9.1 142
Giagheddu [18] 1986 Sardinia, Italy 110 1,500,000 2.6 45
Somnier [23, 24] 1970–1988 Eastern Denmark 229 2,320,000 4.4 77
Yu [25] 1987 Hong Kong 262 5,610,000 4 53.5
Christensen [26] 1990 Western Denmark 290 2,800,000 5 78
Lavrnic [27] 1992 Belgrade, Yugoslavia 124 1,495,000 7.1 121.5
Tola [28] 1994 Emilia Romagna, Italy 86 2,925,000 14.7 n.a.
Robertson [29] 1997 Cambridgeshire, UK 100 685,000 11 150
Poulas [15] 1992–1997 Greece 843 10,475,878 7.4 70.63
Oopik [30] 1997 Estonia 70 1,462,130 n.a. 78
Somnier [6] 1995–1999 Eastern Denmark 241 2,300,000 3.5 vs. 20.81 n.a.
Lai (present study); 2000–2007 Taiwan 5,211 22,958,360 21 140

n.a. = Not available.

1

Early and late onset, respectively.

The typical bimodal age distribution of an early peak in the second and third decades (female predominance) and a late peak in the sixth to eighth decades (male predominance) [1,15,31] observed in Caucasian populations was not observed in the present study, nor was it seen in another 3 MG studies in Chinese populations [25,32,33]. Several reports have noted that the incidence of elderly-onset patients with MG has been increasing in the USA, European countries and Japan [5,6,7,8,22,26,29,34]. Our study showed an older-age predominance distribution, which is similar to that in Japan from 1997 to 2001 [8] and suggests that the incidence of elderly-onset patients with MG is probably also increased in Chinese. A recently published systematic literature review about the incidence of MG showed that the most accurate estimate of incidence of MG was around 30/1,000,000/year and the incidence in children and adolescents was between 1 and 5/1,000,000/year [35]. Our results are similar to the estimation.

Neoplasm of the thymus, thyrotoxicosis and systemic lupus erythematosus need special attention.

In the present study, 12% of the patients had a malignant or benign neoplasm of the thymus, and this is similar to other studies [1,8,32]. Mediastinum image evaluation is necessary for MG patients. Thyroid function tests are also needed in patients suspected of having MG due to the frequently coexisting thyrotoxicosis. Paying attention to other autoimmune diseases is recommended due to relatively common coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus, sicca syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis.

Compared with similar studies we have done on motor neuron diseases [9], Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and multiple sclerosis [10], the average annual medical expense per patient associated with MG is much lower due to the availability of effective and inexpensive medications for the condition.

Conclusions

This study presents the first epidemiological data of MG in Taiwan. The incidence and prevalence of MG in Taiwan were higher than those in most published studies. The phenomenon was most significant in the elderly. A neoplasm of the thymus was present in 12% of MG cases.

Footnotes

This study is based in part on data from the NHI Research Database provided by the Bureau of the NHI, Department of Health, and managed by the National Health Research Institutes. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the Bureau of the NHI, the Department of Health or the National Health Research Institutes.

References

  • 1.Bird SJ: Clinical manifestations of myasthenia gravis. http://www.uptodate.com Accessed on Dec 20, 2008.
  • 2.Grob D, Brunner N, Namba T, Pagala M. Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2008;37:141–149. doi: 10.1002/mus.20950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Phillips LH. The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol. 2004;24:17–20. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-829593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Phillips LH., 2nd The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003;998:407–412. doi: 10.1196/annals.1254.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vincent A, Clover L, Buckley C, Grimley Evans J, Rothwell PM. Evidence of underdiagnosis of myasthenia gravis in older people. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:1105–1108. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.8.1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Somnier FE. Increasing incidence of late-onset anti-AChR antibody-seropositive myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2005;65:928–930. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176067.32186.a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aragones JM, Bolibar I, Bonfill X, Bufill E, Mummany A, Alonso F, Illa I. Myasthenia gravis: a higher than expected incidence in the elderly. Neurology. 2003;60:1024–1026. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000050461.05432.c5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matsuda M, Dohi-Iijima N, Nakamura A, Sekijima Y, Morita H, Matsuzawa S, Sato S, Yahikozawa H, Tabata K, Yanagawa S, Ikeda S. Increase in incidence of elderly-onset patients with myasthenia gravis in Nagano Prefecture, Japan. Intern Med. 2005;44:572–577. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lai CH, Tseng HF. Epidemiology and medical expenses of motor neuron diseases in Taiwan. Neuroepidemiology. 2008;31:159–166. doi: 10.1159/000154928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lai CH, Tseng HF. Population-based epidemiological study of neurological diseases in Taiwan. I. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and multiple sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;33:247–253. doi: 10.1159/000229779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lai CH, Tseng HF. Population-based epidemiologic study of Wilson's disease in Taiwan. Eur J Neurol. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02946.x. E-pub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meriggioli MN, Sanders DB. Myasthenia gravis: diagnosis. Semin Neurol. 2004;24:31–39. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-829594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vincent A, Newsom-Davis J. Acetylcholine receptor antibody as a diagnostic test for myasthenia gravis: results in 153 validated cases and 2,967 diagnostic assays. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48:1246–1252. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.12.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oh SJ, Kim DE, Kuruoglu R, Bradley RJ, Dwyer D. Diagnostic sensitivity of the laboratory tests in myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:720–724. doi: 10.1002/mus.880150616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Poulas K, Tsibri E, Kokla A, Papanastasiou D, Tsouloufis T, Marinou M, Tsantili P, Papapetropoulos T, Tzartos SJ. Epidemiology of seropositive myasthenia gravis in Greece. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:352–356. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.3.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Storm-Mathisen A. Epidemiological and prognostical aspects of myasthenia gravis in Norway. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1966;135:431–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb45491.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garland H, Clark AN. Myasthenia gravis; a personal study of 60 cases. Br Med J. 1956;1:1259–1262. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4978.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Giagheddu M, Puggioni G, Sanna G, Tamburini G, Marrosu F, Rachele MG, Murgia B, Rosati G. Epidemiological study of myasthenia gravis in Sardinia, Italy (1958–1986) Acta Neurol Scand. 1989;79:326–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oosterhuis HJ. The natural course of myasthenia gravis: a long-term follow-up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:1121–1127. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.10.1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pirskanen R. Genetic aspects in myasthenia gravis: a family study of 264 Finnish patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 1977;56:365–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Storm-Mathisen A. Epidemiology of myasthenia gravis in Norway. Acta Neurol Scand. 1984;70:274–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1984.tb00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Phillips LH., 2nd Torner JC, Anderson MS, Cox GM: The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis in central and western Virginia. Neurology. 1992;42:1888–1893. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.10.1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Somnier FE, Keiding N, Paulson OB. Epidemiology of myasthenia gravis in Denmark: a longitudinal and comprehensive population survey. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:733–739. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530190081019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Somnier FE. Myasthenia gravis. Dan Med Bull. 1996;43:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu YL, Hawkins BR, Ip MS, Wong V, Woo E. Myasthenia gravis in Hong Kong Chinese. 1. Epidemiology and adult disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;86:113–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1992.tb05050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Christensen PB, Jensen TS, Tsiropoulos I, Sorensen T, Kjaer M, Hojer-Pedersen E, Rasmussen MJ, Lehfeldt E, de Fine Olivarius B. Incidence and prevalence of myasthenia gravis in western Denmark: 1975 to 1989. Neurology. 1993;43:1779–1783. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.9.1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lavrnic D, Jarebinski M, Rakocevic-Stojanovic V, Stevic Z, Lavrnic S, Pavlovic S, Trikic R, Tripkovic I, Neskovic V, Apostolski S. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of myasthenia gravis in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (1983–1992) Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;100:168–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1999.tb00733.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tola MR, Caniatti LM, Casetta I, Granieri E, Conighi C, Quatrale R, Monetti VC, Paolino E, Govoni V, Pascarella R, et al. Immunogenetic heterogeneity and associated autoimmune disorders in myasthenia gravis: a population-based survey in the province of Ferrara, northern Italy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1994;90:318–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Robertson NP, Deans J, Compston DA. Myasthenia gravis: a population based epidemiological study in Cambridgeshire, England. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;65:492–496. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.4.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oopik M, Kaasik AE, Jakobsen J. A population based epidemiological study on myasthenia gravis in Estonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:1638–1643. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.12.1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thanvi BR, Lo TC. Update on myasthenia gravis. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:690–700. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.018903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang X, Yang M, Xu J, Zhang M, Lang B, Wang W, Vincent A. Clinical and serological study of myasthenia gravis in Hubei Province, China. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:386–390. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.100545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chiu HC, Vincent A, Newsom-Davis J, Hsieh KH, Hung T. Myasthenia gravis: population differences in disease expression and acetylcholine receptor antibody titers between Chinese and Caucasians. Neurology. 1987;37:1854–1857. doi: 10.1212/wnl.37.12.1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Phillips LH, 2nd, Torner JC. Epidemiologic evidence for a changing natural history of myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 1996;47:1233–1238. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.5.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McGrogan A, Sneddon S, de Vries CS. The incidence of myasthenia gravis: a systematic literature review. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34:171–183. doi: 10.1159/000279334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neuroepidemiology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES