Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1971 Mar;50(3):523–533. doi: 10.1172/JCI106521

Left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction

Paul Hamosh 1,2,3, Jay N Cohn 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC291959  PMID: 5101778

Abstract

Left ventricular catheterization was carried out in 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was elevated in 85% of the patients studied. In 14 patients with apparently uncomplicated infarcts, LVEDP averaged 15 mm Hg, and cardiac index (2.98 liter/min/m2), stroke volume (38.3 ml/m2), and stroke work (49.2 g-m/m2) were within normal limits. In 12 patients with clinical signs of left ventricular failure, LVEDP averaged 29.9 mm Hg, cardiac index was at the lower limit of normal (2.79 liter/min/m2), but stroke volume (31.6 ml/m2) and stroke work (37.3 g-m/m2) were reduced. In 14 patients with clinical signs of shock, LVEDP averaged significantly lower than in the heart failure group (21.1 mm Hg), but cardiac index (1.59 liter/min/m2), stroke volume (16.5 ml/m2), and stroke work (11.1 g-m/m2) were markedly reduced. A large presystolic atrial “kick” (average amplitude 9.5 mm Hg) was an important factor in the high LVEDP in the patients with heart failure but not in those with shock. The first derivative of left ventricular pressure was significantly lower in shock than in the nonshock group. Although right atrial pressure (RAP) and LVEDP were significantly correlated (r = 0.49), wide discrepancies in individual patients rendered the RAP an unreliable indicator of the magnitude of left ventricular filling pressure.

These data show the following: (a) LVEDP is usually elevated in acute myocardial infarction, even in absence of clinical heart failure; (b) cardiac output apparently is supported by increased LVEDP and compensatory tachycardia; (c) in patients with shock, left ventricular function usually is markedly impaired, but inadequate compensatory cardiac dilatation or tachycardia could contribute to the reduced cardiac output in some individuals; (d) lower LVEDP in shock than in heart failure may represent differences in left ventricular compliance.

Full text

PDF
523

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AGRESS C. M., BINDER M. J. Cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 1957 Sep;54(3):458–477. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(57)90136-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRAUNWALD E., ROSS J., Jr The ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Appraisal of its value in the recognition of ventricular failure in man. Am J Med. 1963 Feb;34:147–150. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(63)90049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BROCH O. J., HUMERFELT S., HAARSTAD J., MYHRE J. R. Hemodynamic studies in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1959 Apr;57(4):522–529. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(59)90029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braunwald E., Brockenbrough E. C., Frahm C. J., Ross J., Jr Left atrial and left ventricular pressures in subjects without cardiovascular disease: observations in eighteen patients studied by transseptal left heart catheterization. Circulation. 1961 Aug;24:267–269. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.24.2.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COHN J. N., LURIA M. H. STUDIES IN CLINICAL SHOCK AND HYPOTENSION; THE VALUE OF BEDSIDE HEMODYNAMIC OBSERVATIONS. JAMA. 1964 Dec 7;190:891–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cannon P. J., Haft J. I., Johnson P. M. Visual assessment of regional myocardial perfusion utilizing radioactive xenon and scintillation photography. Circulation. 1969 Sep;40(3):277–288. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.40.3.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaing B. N., Alexander E. R., Bruce R. A., Thompson D. J., Ting N. Factors related to ST-segment depression after exercise in middle-aged Chinese men. Circulation. 1969 Sep;40(3):315–325. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.40.3.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohn J. N. Central venous pressure as a guide to volume expansion. Ann Intern Med. 1967 Jun;66(6):1283–1287. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-66-6-1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn J. N., Khatri I. M., Hamosh P. Bedside catheterization of the left ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 1970 Jan;25(1):66–69. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(70)90816-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohn J. N., Luria M. H., Daddario R. C., Tristani F. E. Studies in clinical shock and hypotension. V. Hemodynamic effects of dextran. Circulation. 1967 Feb;35(2):316–326. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.35.2.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohn J. N. Myocardial infarction shock revisited. Am Heart J. 1967 Jul;74(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(67)90033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohn J. N., Tristani F. E., Khatri I. M. Studies in clinical shock and hypotension: VI. Relationship between left and right ventricular function. J Clin Invest. 1969 Nov;48(11):2008–2018. doi: 10.1172/JCI106166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FREIS E. D., SCHNAPER H. W., JOHNSON R. L., SCHREINER G. E. Hemodynamic alterations in acute myocardial infarction. I. Cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance, central and total blood volumes, venous pressure and average circulation time. J Clin Invest. 1952 Feb;31(2):131–140. doi: 10.1172/JCI102584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fluck D. C., Valentine P. A., Treister B., Higgs B., Reid D. N., Steiner R. E., Mounsey J. P. Right heart pressures in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1967 Sep;29(5):748–757. doi: 10.1136/hrt.29.5.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GAMMILL J. F., APPLEGARTH J. J., REED C. E., FERNALD J. D., ANTENUCCI A. J. Hemodynamic changes following acute myocardial infarction using the dye injection method for cardiac output determination. Ann Intern Med. 1955 Jul;43(1):100–119. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-43-1-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GAZES P. C., RICHARDSON J. A., WOODS E. F. Plasma catechol amine concentrations in myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. Circulation. 1959 May;19(5):657–661. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.19.5.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. GILBERT R. P., GOLDBERG M., GRIFFIN J. Circulatory changes in acute myo cardial infarction. Circulation. 1954 Jun;9(6):847–852. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.9.6.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gunnar R. M., Cruz A., Boswell J., Co B. S., Pietras R. J., Tobin J. R., Jr Myocardial infarction with shock. Hemodynamic studies and results of therapy. Circulation. 1966 May;33(5):753–762. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.33.5.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunnar R. M., Loeb H. S., Pietras R. J., Tobin J. R. Hemodynamic measurements in a coronary care unit. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1968 Jul;11(1):29–44. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(68)80009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. HARRISON T. R. SOME UNANSWERED QUESTIONS CONCERNING ENLARGEMENT AND FAILURE OF THE HEART. Am Heart J. 1965 Jan;69:100–115. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(65)90223-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herman M. V., Gorlin R. Implications of left ventricular asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Apr;23(4):538–547. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(69)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kirby B. J., McNicol M. W., Tattersfield A. E. Left ventricular pressures in two patients with myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1968 May 4;1(7549):944–946. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)90902-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. LAURENT D., BOLENE-WILLIAMS C., WILLIAMS F. L., KATZ L. N. Effects of heart rate on coronary flow and cardiac oxygen consumption. Am J Physiol. 1956 May;185(2):355–364. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.185.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lassers B. W., George M., Anderton J. L., Higgins M. R., Philp T. Left ventricular failure in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1970 May;25(5):511–522. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(70)90589-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Linhart J. W., Hildner F. J., Barold S. S., Listejw, Samet P. Left heart hemodynamics during angina pectoris induced by atrial pacing. Circulation. 1969 Oct;40(4):483–492. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.40.4.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MACKENZIE G. J., FLENLEY D. C., TAYLOR S. H., MCDONALD A. H., STAUNTON H. P., DONALD K. W. CIRCULATORY AND RESPIRATORY STUDIES IN MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND CARDIOGENIC SHOCK. Lancet. 1964 Oct 17;2(7364):825–832. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)90684-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nixon P. G. Pulmonary oedema with low left ventricular diastolic pressure in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1968 Jul 20;2(7560):146–147. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)90424-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parmley W. W., Glick G., Sonnenblick E. H. Cardiovascular effects of glucagon in man. N Engl J Med. 1968 Jul 4;279(1):12–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196807042790103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. REEVES T. J., HEFNER L. L., JONES W. B., COGHLAN C., PRIETO G., CARROLL J. The hemodynamic determinants of the rate of change in pressure in the left ventricle during isometric contraction. Am Heart J. 1960 Nov;60:745–761. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(60)90358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sampson J. J., Hutchinson J. C. Heart failure in myocardial infarction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1967 Jul;10(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(67)80003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shillingford J. P., Thomas M. Cardiovascular and pulmonary changes in patients with myocardial infarction treated in an intensive care and research unit. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Oct;20(4):484–493. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith H. J., Oriol A., Morch J., McGregor M. Hemodynamic studies in cardiogenic shock. Treatment with isoproterenol and metaraminol. Circulation. 1967 Jun;35(6):1084–1091. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.35.6.1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. THROWER W. B., DARBY T. D., ALDINGER E. E., TENNEY M., WESTBROOK W. H. Studies of the relationship between sympathoadrenal function, acid base derangements and ventricular contractile force. Surg Forum. 1960;10:535–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Valencia A., Burgess J. H. Arterial hypoxemia following acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1969 Nov;40(5):641–652. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.40.5.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Valentine P. A., Fluck D. C., Mounsey J. P., Reid D., Shillingford J. P., Steiner R. E. Blood-gas changes after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1966 Oct 15;2(7468):837–841. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)92259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weil M. H., Shubin H. Shock following acute myocardial infarction. Current understanding of hemodynamic mechanisms. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1968 Jul;11(1):1–17. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(68)80007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weisse A. B., Saffa R. S., Levinson G. E., Jacobson W. W., Jr, Regan T. J. Left ventricular function during the early and late stages of scar formation following experimental myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1970 Mar;79(3):370–383. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(70)90424-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weissler A. M., Harris W. S., Schoenfeld C. D. Bedside technics for the evaluation of ventricular function in man. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Apr;23(4):577–583. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(69)90012-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES