Abstract
Accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis requires that homologous chromosomes pair and become physically connected so that they can orient properly on the meiosis I spindle. These connections are formed by homologous recombination closely integrated with the development of meiosis-specific, higher-order chromosome structures. The yeast Pch2 protein has emerged as an important factor with roles in both recombination and chromosome structure formation, but recent analysis suggested that TRIP13, the mouse Pch2 ortholog, is not required for the same processes. Using distinct Trip13 alleles with moderate and severe impairment of TRIP13 function, we report here that TRIP13 is required for proper synaptonemal complex formation, such that autosomal bivalents in Trip13-deficient meiocytes frequently displayed pericentric synaptic forks and other defects. In males, TRIP13 is required for efficient synapsis of the sex chromosomes and for sex body formation. Furthermore, the numbers of crossovers and chiasmata are reduced in the absence of TRIP13, and their distribution along the chromosomes is altered, suggesting a role for TRIP13 in aspects of crossover formation and/or control. Recombination defects are evident very early in meiotic prophase, soon after DSB formation. These findings provide evidence for evolutionarily conserved functions for TRIP13/Pch2 in both recombination and formation of higher order chromosome structures, and they support the hypothesis that TRIP13/Pch2 participates in coordinating these key aspects of meiotic chromosome behavior.
Author Summary
Meiosis is the specialized cell division that gives rise to reproductive cells such as sperm and eggs. During meiosis in most organisms, genetic information is exchanged between homologous maternal and paternal chromosomes through the process of homologous recombination. This recombination forms connections between homologous chromosomes that allow them to segregate accurately when the meiotic cell divides. Recombination defects can result in reproductive cells with abnormal chromosome numbers, which are a major cause of developmental disorders and spontaneous abortions in humans. Meiotic recombination is tightly controlled such that each pair of chromosomes undergoes at least one crossover recombination event despite a low average number of crossovers per chromosome. Recombination is coordinated with the development of specialized, meiosis-specific chromosome structures that stabilize pairing interactions between homologous maternal and paternal chromosomes. We show here that the mouse TRIP13 protein is required for normal execution of many aspects of meiotic recombination and chromosome structure development that it was not previously known to influence. Intriguingly, many of these new roles appear to parallel known functions of a homologous protein from budding yeast, called Pch2. These findings thus indicate that TRIP13/Pch2 functions are more widely conserved throughout evolution than thought before.
Introduction
Meiosis generates haploid gametes from a diploid progenitor in order for proper ploidy to be restored after fertilization. Meiocytes accomplish haploidization by performing two rounds of chromosome segregation after a single round of replication. During prophase of the first meiotic division in most organisms, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are produced by the Spo11 protein [1] and repair of these breaks promotes recombination, pairing, and synapsis of homologous chromosomes [2]. Meiotic recombination can lead to a crossover (CO), involving reciprocal exchange of chromosome arms flanking the break, or to a non-crossover (NCO). COs, in conjunction with sister chromatid cohesion, provide physical connections between homologous chromosomes that ensure their faithful segregation in the first meiotic division.
As recombination progresses, chromosomes form higher order structures, most prominently the synaptonemal complex (SC), which comprises two lateral elements (one for each homologous chromosome) and transverse filaments linking them together [3], [4]. In many species, mutations affecting chromosome structure components perturb meiotic recombination, and, conversely, mutants defective for recombination proteins have chromosome structure defects (reviewed in [5], [6]). These and other observations demonstrate the interrelatedness of recombination and higher order chromosome structures [6].
In budding yeast, Pch2 (pachytene checkpoint 2) is a meiosis-specific AAA+ ATPase family member that is required for checkpoint arrest in response to certain meiotic defects, including those caused by absence of the SC transverse filament protein Zip1 [7], [8]. This checkpoint role depends specifically on a sub-population of Pch2 protein that localizes within the nucleolus [7], [9]. Checkpoint-related roles have also been observed in C. elegans, where pch-2 is required for apoptosis of oocytes in mutants deficient for SC components [10] and in D. melanogaster, where pch2 is required for a delay in oocyte selection that occurs in mutants defective for certain crossover-promoting factors [11].
More recently, a chromosomally localized fraction of yeast Pch2 has been shown to play important roles in normal (unperturbed) meiosis. First, Pch2 is required for timely and efficient recombination: DSBs persist longer in pch2 mutants than in wild type [12]; pch2 mutants show a slight delay in meiotic divisions that is dependent on Rad17, a checkpoint factor that responds to unrepaired DSBs [13]; and pch2 mutants are delayed for formation of both COs and NCOs [9], [13]. Second, Pch2 is important for CO control: pch2 mutants are defective in maintaining normal separation of adjacent COs (“CO interference”), maintaining wild-type numbers of COs when meiotic DSBs are reduced by hypomorphic spo11 mutations (“CO homeostasis”), and ensuring formation of at least one CO per chromosome pair (the “obligate CO”) [14], [15]. Third, Pch2 is required for proper formation and/or maintenance of SC or other higher order chromosome structures: pch2 mutants show abnormal chromosomal localization of the SC central element protein Zip1 and the axis-associated protein Hop1 [9], [14]. Because Pch2 is needed for both recombination and chromosome structure formation, Pch2 has been hypothesized to coordinate these two features of meiotic chromosome dynamics [9], [14], [15].
In mouse, a hypomorphic mutation of the PCH2 ortholog, Trip13 (thyroid hormone receptor interacting protein), supports apparently normal apoptosis of recombination- or synapsis-defective mutants, suggesting that checkpoint functions of TRIP13 are not conserved in mammals [16]. However, TRIP13 is essential for completion of otherwise wild-type meiosis in both male and female mice. Interestingly, mutant spermatocytes were defective for completing meiotic DSB repair but were competent to complete homologous synapsis and appeared to form normal numbers of COs. These observations led to the suggestion that, unlike Pch2 in yeast, TRIP13 is involved specifically in a recombination pathway(s) that leads to NCOs, but is dispensable for COs [16]. These findings thus suggested that Pch2/TRIP13 plays different roles in mouse than in other organisms.
Here we present characterization of a more severe Trip13 mutant allele along with more detailed analysis of the previously described hypomorph. These studies reveal for the first time that TRIP13 is needed for efficient completion of homologous synapsis. Moreover, we provide evidence that TRIP13 promotes early steps of the DSB repair process upstream of the assembly of RAD51 complexes, and is required for normal number and distribution of COs, thus affecting both CO and NCO pathways. The TRIP13 functions revealed in this study are reminiscent of many of the functions observed for the chromosome-bound Pch2 protein in budding yeast, implying evolutionarily conserved roles.
Results
Trip13 mutant mice
Trip13 is widely expressed in adult tissues, including testis [16] (Figure 1A), where it is expressed in spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids (Figure 1A–1D). A splice variant lacking exon 8 (which includes the Walker B ATPase motif) was detected specifically in spermatocytes and spermatids (Figure 1A, 1E, 1G), although the functional significance of this form of the Trip13 mRNA is not yet clear.
We created Trip13 mutant mice using ES cell lines containing a gene trap in either intron 2 (clone CH0621) or intron 3 (clone RRB047) (Figure 1F). These alleles yielded different phenotypes. As described by Li and Schimenti [16], Trip13RRB047 is a hypomorphic mutation that significantly reduces Trip13 expression, such that transcripts are detected by RT-PCR at reduced levels in Trip13RRB047/RRB047 mice (Figure 1G). Trip13 expression was even more substantially reduced in testes from Trip13CH0621/CH0621 mice (Figure 1G). Trip13CH0621 is thus significantly tighter than Trip13RRB047. For clarity, we refer below to Trip13RRB047 as Trip13mod (for “moderate”), and to Trip13CH0621 as Trip13sev (for “severe”). Unless otherwise noted, control mice were littermates homozygous for the wild-type allele, and all analyses were conducted on at least two mutant/control pairs to ensure reproducibility.
Both Trip13 alleles segregated in a sub-Mendelian ratio: only 11.5% of pups from Trip13+/mod mice were homozygous mutants (32.5% wild type and 56.0% heterozygotes, N = 416), in agreement with prior results [16]. Similarly, only 10.9% Trip13sev/sev homozygotes were obtained from Trip13+/sev crosses (30.7% wild type and 58.4% heterozygotes, N = 202). Segregation of the mutant alleles is not significantly different (p = 0.956, G test). The sub-Mendelian inheritance suggests that TRIP13 has another function apart from its role in meiosis. Trip13mod/mod animals in certain strain backgrounds were found to have reduced body size and abnormal tails [16], although we observed no obvious somatic phenotypes for either allele in our colony (data not shown). This difference between the two studies is likely attributable to effects of strain background on expressivity and penetrance of somatic phenotypes.
TRIP13 is needed for completion of meiosis
As previously reported [16], we found that TRIP13 is needed for the completion of meiosis, since homozygous mutant animals were sterile because of severe blocks to spermatogenesis or oogenesis. For both alleles, mutant males had significantly smaller testes than wild-type littermates (0.59±0.16% of total body mass in wild type (avg. ± sd, N = 8); 0.28±0.22% in Trip13mod/mod (N = 10); and 0.14±0.01% for Trip13sev/sev (N = 4); p ≤ 0.05 for either mutant vs. wild type, t test; difference between mutants was not significant (p = 0.225)). Testes contain seminiferous tubules, within which germ cells undergo spermatogenesis. Tubule cross sections can be classified in stages, from I–XII, based on the array of germ cell developmental steps present [17]. Histological analysis revealed that testes from both mutants had less populated tubules compared to wild type (Figure 2A–2C). In Trip13mod/mod mice, spermatogenesis was mostly arrested at spermatocyte stages of epithelial stage IV, corresponding to pachynema (red arrowheads, Figure 2B). However, spermatocytes occasionally escaped this arrest as judged by presence of some post-meiotic cells (green arrowheads, Figure 2B). However, we did not observe any late-stage spermatids, implying that cells that escape pachytene arrest could not complete spermiogenesis. TUNEL staining revealed that most of the cells arrested at epithelial stage IV undergo apoptosis (Figure 2E). Trip13sev/sev males also arrested spermatogenesis at epithelial stage IV (Figure 2C and 2F), but no post-meiotic cells were observed, indicating that pachytene arrest is tighter.
Oogenesis was also severely affected by both mutations. Female germ cells complete early stages of meiotic prophase I during fetal development and undergo cell cycle arrest at around birth. Soon after birth, each surviving oocyte becomes surrounded by somatic (granulosa) cells, forming a primordial follicle that remains arrested until recruited for further development during the reproductive life of the animal [18]. At this time, some follicles undergo an initial synchronous wave of development, in which the oocyte increases in size and the somatic cells change shape and proliferate (Figure 2G). Ovaries from 21-day-old Trip13mod/mod animals had no detectable primordial follicles and had four-fold fewer developing follicles than wild type (Figure 2H). By two months of age, no follicles were detected in this mutant (data not shown). These results indicate that a large majority of Trip13mod/mod oocytes are unable to complete folliculogenesis; the small number of escapers that generate follicles are immediately recruited to develop, causing rapid depletion of the oocyte pool. Ovaries from Trip13sev/sev females showed an even greater defect, as they were devoid of follicles at 21 dpp (Figure 2I). A block to folliculogenesis is typical of mutants unable to repair meiotic DSBs [19], suggesting that TRIP13 is required for completion of meiotic recombination (see below).
Trip13 mutants display unusual defects in homologous synapsis of autosomes
During meiotic prophase, homologous chromosome pairing is stabilized by the SC. Synapsis can be monitored by following deposition of proteins of the lateral elements (e.g., SYCP3) and the central element (e.g., SYCP1) by immunofluorescence on spread chromosomes. In wild-type meiosis, stretches of SYCP3 first appear at leptonema (Figure 3A). Later, at zygonema, homologs begin to synapse, marked by the presence of SYCP1 (Figure 3B). At pachynema, homologous autosomes are completely synapsed along their lengths such that SYCP3 and SYCP1 completely co-localize (Figure 3C). At diplonema, homolog axes separate but remain joined at sites where COs have occurred, called chiasmata (Figure 3D).
In Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes, progression of autosomal synapsis appeared similar to wild type [16] (Figure 3E–3G), and at diplonema, homologous axes separated from one another normally, with most remaining joined at one or a few sites, consistent with chiasmata (Figure 3H). However, a more detailed analysis revealed that SC formation was not fully normal. Specifically, total autosomal SC length at pachynema was on average 11% shorter than in wild type (152.2±8.5 µm in Trip13mod/mod (N = 20 cells) vs. 171.6±15.7 µm in wild type (N = 32 cells); p = 0.0001, t test). To test if shorter SCs affected only chromosomes of a particular size range, we measured the length of all bivalents, ranked them by size, and then divided them into five groups of similarly sized chromosomes (Table 1). For each chromosome group, the average length of an SC in the mutant was significantly smaller than in wild type. Thus, all autosomal SCs were reduced in length to a similar extent.
Table 1. Autosomal SCs are shorter on average in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes.
Wild type | Trip13mod/mod | |||||
Chromosome size ranks | SC length (µm)a | % of total SCb | Nc | SC length (µm)a,d | % of total SCb | Nc |
1–2 | 12.8±1.7 | 7.5 | 22 | 11.0±1.0 | 7.4 | 34 |
3–5 | 11.1±1.2 | 6.5 | 33 | 9.5±0.7 | 6.4 | 51 |
6–11 | 9.5±1.1 | 5.5 | 66 | 8.1±0.7 | 5.5 | 102 |
12–16 | 7.7±0.9 | 4.5 | 55 | 6.8±0.6 | 4.6 | 85 |
17–19 | 5.8±1.3 | 3.4 | 33 | 5.2±1.0 | 3.5 | 51 |
Pachytene spermatocyte spreads were immunostained for SYCP3 and lengths of autosomal SCs were measured from wild-type and Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes. The bivalents in each spread were rank-ordered by length from 1 (largest) to 19 (smallest), then divided into groups of similarly sized chromosomes. Note that each of the chromosomes in each size class makes up essentially the same percentage of total SC length in both genotypes, indicating that the decrease in average total SC length in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes is uniform across all autosomes.
Mean ± standard deviation for each chromosome in the indicated size rank.
The mean SC length per chromosome divided by the average total SC length per cell, multiplied by 100.
Total number of chromosomes analyzed.
These values are statistically significantly different from those for wild type (p≤0.05, t test).
These findings indicate that wild-type levels of TRIP13 are needed for formation of structurally normal SC, but the defects in Trip13mod/mod mutants were relatively subtle. If these modest defects reflect a bona fide requirement for TRIP13, then more substantial defects should be encountered in Trip13sev/sev cells. This was in fact the case. Synapsis initiation appeared normal in Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes, as judged by staining patterns for SYCP3 and SYCP1 in leptonema and zygonema (Figure 3I–3J), but proper pachynema with fully synapsed autosomal bivalents was never observed. Instead, the most advanced cells showed a late zygotene-like morphology—given that full-length axes had developed but remained incompletely synapsed—but with characteristics of pachytene cells such as acquisition of the characteristic knob-like accumulation of SYCP3 at telomeres (Figure 3K and Table 2). Because there does not appear to be a stage when synapsis is complete, it is likely that the unsynapsed regions are asynaptic (i.e., where SC did not form at all) rather than desynaptic (i.e., where SC had formed but subsequently disassembled). Interestingly, most of the incompletely synapsed bivalents had one end unsynapsed (i.e., a forked structure), and this was nearly always (93%) the centromeric end (Figure 3L and Table 2). A minority of bivalents had other synaptic anomalies such as having both ends unsynapsed or only interstitial asynapsis (a “bubble”) (Figure 3L and Table 2). The unsynapsed regions accounted for 28.2% of total axis length in a representative population of pachytene-like cells (N = 7 cells). Similar synaptic anomalies were also observed in Trip13sev/sev oocytes. Most oocyte bivalents at the pachytene-like stage presented some degree of asynapsis, with most showing unsynapsed centromeric ends (Figure 4 and Table 2).
Table 2. Synaptic anomalies in Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes and oocytes.
Synaptic anomaly | Number of aberrant bivalents in spermatocytes (375 bivalents total) | Number of aberrant bivalents in oocytes (136 bivalents total) |
All anomalies | 283 (75.4%) | 100 (73.6%) |
One end unsynapsed (fork)a | 230 (61.3%) | 89 (65.5%) |
Only the centromeric end unsynapseda | 213 (56.8%) | 87 (64.0%) |
Both ends unsynapseda | 32 (8.5%) | 5 (3.7%) |
Interstitial asynapsis only (bubble) | 21 (5.6%) | 6 (4.4%) |
Irrespective of whether interstitial asynapsis was also present.
Recent studies have demonstrated that Trip13 is also required for changes in the protein composition of chromosome axes that accompany SC formation [20]. HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 are mammalian members of an evolutionarily conserved family of meiotic axis proteins, related to Hop1 in yeast [20], [21]. In mouse, HORMAD1 and -2 become substantially depleted from chromosome axes soon after synapsis in wild type, but not in Trip13mod/mod cells [20]. Trip13sev/sev mutants have a similar defect, with substantial levels of HORMAD1 and -2 staining retained on the axes of nearly fully synapsed chromosomes in pachytene-like cells (Figure 5).
TRIP13 is required for XY synapsis and sex body formation
We also evaluated the effect of the Trip13 mutations on the sex chromosomes. In pachytene spermatocytes, the X–Y pair forms only a short stretch of SC encompassing the small region of homology they share with one another, termed the pseudoautosomal region (PAR) (Figure 3C and 3G). Because the PAR is small (only ∼700 kb in at least one mouse strain [22]), this chromosome pair is very sensitive to perturbations of the synaptic process, and thus can report on subtle defects that might not be seen on the autosomes [23]. In Trip13mod/mod animals, the X and Y were separated at pachynema in 6.5% of spermatocytes (N = 154), a 7.2-fold increase over the frequency in wild type (0.9%, N = 116, p = 0.01 Fisher's exact test). Moreover, 54.2% of pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes displayed unsynapsed X and Y chromosomes (N = 24) (Figure 3K), an 8-fold increase over the frequency in Trip13mod/mod and a 60-fold increase over wild type. The stronger phenotype in Trip13sev/sev cells reinforces the significance of the modest XY synapsis defect found in Trip13mod/mod mutants.
During prophase in spermatocytes, the X and Y form a sub-nuclear domain (the sex body) that is transcriptionally silenced (meiotic sex chromosome inactivation, MSCI) (reviewed in [24]). MSCI entails localization of BRCA1 protein to unsynapsed X and Y axes, subsequent recruitment of the kinase ATR to the axes and peripheral chromatin loops, and phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX to form γH2AX, which appears on the X and Y chromatin from zygonema onwards (Figure 6A–6C). All pachytene Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes analyzed (N≥42 cells for each MSCI marker) showed apparently normal accumulation of BRCA1 and ATR on sex chromosomes and sex body formation as judged by staining for γH2AX (Figure 6D–6F), which indicates that MSCI takes place in Trip13mod/mod mutants. Normal sex body formation was also inferred from γH2AX patterns in earlier studies [16].
In contrast, only 32.0% of pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes (N = 100) showed X and Y chromosome axes coated with BRCA1, and only 0.7% of mutant cells (N = 141) had the normal pattern of ATR covering the X and Y axes and chromatin. Instead, most cells showed numerous BRCA1 or ATR patches or foci distributed on many chromosomes, with no clear preference for the X and Y (Figure 6G and 6H). These findings indicate that BRCA1 enrichment on the X and Y is not sufficient to ensure ATR enrichment. Only 9.8% of pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes formed a sex body-like accumulation of γH2AX (N = 61), with most cells displaying prominent patches of γH2AX that did not co-localize with the sex chromosomes (Figure 6I). From analysis of other mouse mutants, it has been hypothesized that unsynapsed autosomal regions cause sex body failure by sequestering proteins required for MSCI [25]. It is thus likely that MSCI failure in Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes is an indirect consequence of autosomal asynapsis. MSCI failure is sufficient to trigger apoptosis of pachytene spermatocytes [24], [26], so this defect likely explains spermatogenic arrest in Trip13sev/sev mutants (but not in Trip13mod/mod mutants, since these are proficient for MSCI; see next section for further discussion).
TRIP13 is required for timely completion of meiotic recombination
As described in the Introduction, yeast Pch2 is needed for normal progression of homologous recombination toward both CO and NCO outcomes, and previous work provided evidence that mouse TRIP13 is also required for completion of recombination [16]. The availability of two Trip13 mutant alleles with different severity provided an opportunity to examine this issue in greater detail. DSB repair can be followed indirectly by staining chromosomes for γH2AX, which forms rapidly on chromatin near DSBs [27], and for strand-exchange proteins RAD51 and DMC1, which form cytological complexes at sites of ongoing recombination [28], [29]. During zygonema, the number of RAD51/DMC1 foci peaks and γH2AX progressively disappears where synapsis has occurred. In normal pachynema, most of these early DSB markers have disappeared from autosomes and only a handful of RAD51/DMC1 foci remain on the unsynapsed regions of sex chromosomes (Figure 7A), along with the DSB-independent γH2AX in the sex body (Figure 6C).
During pachynema, as previously described [16], Trip13mod/mod mice showed persistent γH2AX and RAD51/DMC1 foci on synapsed autosomes, an indicator of delayed and/or inefficient DSB repair (Figure 6F and Figure 7B). In our analysis, Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes at this stage displayed 7.2-fold more RAD51/DMC1 foci than wild type (Figure 7J and Table 3). Similarly, pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes showed persistent γH2AX on unsynapsed autosomes (Figure 6I), and RAD51/DMC1 foci were also substantially elevated, although lower on average and more variable than in the weaker mutant (5.4-fold higher than wild type; Figure 7C and 7J and Table 3). The few Trip13mod/mod cells that successfully reached diplonema had normal (i.e., very low) levels of RAD51/DMC1 foci (Figure 7J and Table 3), so it is likely that these represent a small subset of cells that successfully repaired most of their DSBs due to residual expression of TRIP13. No diplotene cells were recovered from Trip13sev/sev testes. The anti-RAD51 antibody used for this analysis shows weak cross-reaction with DMC1 on western blots (data not shown), so we also examined wild-type and Trip13sev/sev nuclei immunostained with a DMC1-specific antibody. In wild-type pachynema, essentially all DMC1 foci have disappeared, but pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes showed large numbers of persistent DMC1 foci (>300-fold more than wild-type littermates; Figure 7K and Table 3).
Table 3. Numbers of early recombination-associated foci in spermatocytes.
Genotype | ||||
Protein | Stage | Wild type | Trip13mod/mod | Trip13sev/sev |
RPA | Leptonema | 27.6±22.0 | 52.1±20.9a | 70.2±26.9a,b |
RAD51/DMC1c | Early Leptonema | 130.7±60.4 | 82.3±52.0a | 33.3±43.3a,b |
Late Leptonema | 179.3±45.3 | 146.9±50.4a | 99.5±35.5a,b | |
Early Zygonema | 219.7±49.1 | 189.9±36.4a | 144.5±22.7a,b | |
Late Zygonema | 133.3±43.7 | 156.3±34.8a | 136.9±21.6 | |
Pachynema | 18.2±7.0 | 131.0±14.5a | 99.0±42.6a,b | |
Diplonema | 6.0±6.2 | 13.0±8.9 | n.a. | |
DMC1d | Early Leptonema | 33.7±17.0 | n.d. | 45.5±22.2 |
Late Leptonema | 147.8±50.7 | n.d. | 147.8±38.1 | |
Early Zygonema | 141.8±31.1 | n.d. | 169.7±21.9a | |
Late Zygonema | 77.2±27.0 | n.d. | 166.0±19.2a | |
Pachynema | 0.4±0.7 | n.d. | 147.8±23.5a |
Significantly different from wild type (p≤0.05, t test).
Significantly different from Trip13mod/mod (p≤0.05, t test).
Detected with an anti-RAD51 antibody that cross-reacts with DMC1.
Detected with a DMC1-specific antibody.
n.a., not applicable; n.d., not determined.
Analyses of other cytological markers extend these findings. Specifically, 8% of Trip13mod/mod pachytene spermatocytes displayed discrete BRCA1 foci on synapsed autosomes (N = 50), which was never observed in wild type (N = 58) (data not shown). In contrast, such foci were observed in 73% of pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes (N = 100 cells) (Figure 6G). Pachytene-like Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes also displayed ATR foci on synapsed autosomes (Figure 6H), which were not observed in wild type or Trip13mod/mod (data not shown). These patterns indicate that Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes have a more severe block to recombination.
Previous studies of other mouse recombination mutants demonstrated that the presence of unrepaired DSBs in late zygotene and early pachytene spermatocytes provokes a regulatory response that is separable from MSCI failure alone [30]. Thus, it seems likely that Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes undergo apoptosis as a direct consequence of defects in repair of SPO11-induced DSBs (see also ref. [24]). In oocytes, meiotic DSB repair defects cause early and severe meiotic arrest that is partially suppressed by eliminating DSB formation [19]. Trip13 mutant ovaries resemble those of DSB repair-defective mutants such as Dmc1–/– and Msh5–/– (Figure 2H and ref. [19]), and mutation of Spo11 substantially suppresses the early oocyte loss phenotype of Trip13mod/mod animals [16], strongly suggesting that unrepaired breaks lead to oocyte loss in Trip13 mutants.
TRIP13 is required early in DSB repair
The above findings support the conclusion that TRIP13 is needed for timely and efficient completion of meiotic recombination. However, further analysis revealed informative defects even earlier in meiotic prophase. From early leptonema to early zygonema, Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes had significantly fewer RAD51/DMC1 foci than wild-type cells of equivalent stage (63–86% of wild type on average, depending on stage; Figure 7J and Table 3). Trip13sev/sev spermatocytes displayed even lower numbers (25–66% of wild type; Figure 7J and Table 3). Staining with the DMC1-specific antibody revealed a very different result, however: strikingly, there was no detectable difference in numbers of DMC1 foci between wild type and Trip13sev/sev in early or late leptonema (Figure 7K and Table 3). These findings strongly suggest that TRIP13 is required specifically for assembly of normal numbers of RAD51 complexes. RAD51 and DMC1 colocalize extensively, such that most recombination-associated foci stain positive for both proteins [31]. In wild-type, there are fewer DMC1 foci than RAD51 foci (Figure 7J and 7K); assuming equivalent detection efficiencies, this finding suggests that there are a subset of foci that contain predominantly RAD51. These could be a distinct subset of DSB sites that never accumulate DMC1 or, alternatively, a reflection of changes in protein composition over time at recombination sites. In any case, we note that numbers of DMC1 foci throughout prophase in Trip13sev/sev are sufficient to account for all of the foci observed with the less specific anti-RAD51 antibody (Table 3). (The lower numbers of anti-RAD51 foci may reflect lower efficiency for detection of DMC1 by this antibody, as suggested by weaker anti-DMC1 western blot signal (data not shown).) It is possible that little or no RAD51 is ever loaded at DSB sites in this mutant, or that the mutant is specifically defective for forming a subpopulation of RAD51-only foci. More highly specific anti-RAD51 reagents will be necessary to evaluate this issue fully.
Observing fewer RAD51 foci at early stages was unexpected, but the greater severity of Trip13sev/sev mutants reinforces the significance of this finding. The normal numbers of DMC1 foci in leptonema in Trip13sev/sev indicate that DSB formation is neither reduced nor delayed, but to address this question more thoroughly, we examined γH2AX formation during leptonema, which is provoked by SPO11-generated DSBs in a largely ATM-dependent fashion [23], [27], [32]. Both Trip13 mutants showed γH2AX distributed widely across the chromatin in leptonema, with timing and spatial patterns comparable to those seen in wild type (Figure 7D–7F). To compare amounts of SPO11-induced γH2AX, we carried out western blotting on extracts from testes of juvenile mice, in which the only spermatocytes present are in the first, semi-synchronous wave of meiosis. At 11.5 dpp, most spermatocytes are in leptonema or zygonema, and few, if any, cells have reached later stages when MSCI-associated γH2AX formation begins (data not shown). Thus, the majority of the γH2AX signal at this age is SPO11-dependent (compare wild type with Spo11–/– littermates in Figure 7L, right panel). In this analysis, Trip13mod/mod and Trip13sev/sev mutants displayed similar γH2AX levels as wild-type littermates (Figure 7L). These findings strongly indicate that DSBs form with normal timing and in roughly normal amounts in both Trip13 mutants.
We also examined chromatin-bound complexes of the ssDNA binding protein RPA, which acts early in recombination to enhance formation of RAD51 and DMC1 nucleoprotein filaments on ssDNA [33]. Normal leptotene spermatocytes display relatively few RPA foci despite the presence of numerous DSBs with ssDNA tails, presumably because RPA is rapidly displaced by RAD51 and DMC1 [34]. (Abundant, prominent foci of RPA are observed later on synapsed chromosome axes after RAD51/DMC1 complexes have disappeared [35], but these RPA foci most likely mark D-loops or other later recombination intermediates.) If TRIP13 promotes the assembly of RAD51 onto resected DSB ends, we reasoned that RPA foci might accumulate to higher numbers in leptotene spermatocytes in the Trip13 mutants. Indeed, RPA foci were increased 1.9-fold (Trip13mod/mod) and 2.5-fold (Trip13sev/sev) relative to wild type (Figure 7G–7I and 7M) (p≤0.0012 for all pair wise comparisons, t test). Taken together, our findings place TRIP13 function earlier in recombination than previously anticipated, before RAD51 focus formation but after formation and resection of SPO11-induced DSBs.
TRIP13 is needed for normal CO numbers and to ensure that at least one chiasma forms per bivalent
Autosomes
Only a subset of DSBs are repaired as COs. The remainder, ∼90% in mouse, are presumed to be repaired as NCOs. Because Trip13mod/mod pachytene spermatocytes appeared to have numbers of MLH1 foci (a marker for COs) similar to values typically reported for wild type, it was hypothesized that the persistent DSBs in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes reflect a NCO-specific defect [16]. However, because pch2 mutant yeast have abnormal CO patterns, we examined this issue in more detail. As detailed below, we find that TRIP13 is required for normal CO numbers in both male and female meiosis and, moreover, that TRIP13 is needed for formation of at least one CO/chiasma per chromosome pair.
In agreement with prior studies, we readily observed autosomal MLH1 foci in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes (Figure 8A). Surprisingly, however, there was a small but significant reduction in the total number per cell when compared to wild-type littermates (Figure 8B; p = 0.002, Mann-Whitney test). Trip13+/mod mice were indistinguishable from their wild-type littermates (Figure 8B; p = 0.44). There was a significant decrease in the number of bivalents with two MLH1 foci (28.1% of bivalents in Trip13mod/mod compared to 36.1% in wild type), and a significant increase in the number of bivalents with no detectable focus (3.8% in the mutant (N = 420 bivalents) compared to only 0.9% in wild-type spermatocytes (N = 332), p = 0.017, G test) (Figure 8C).
If the reduced MLH1 foci in Trip13mod/mod cells reflect a decrease in COs rather than a difference in ability to detect COs via MLH1 staining, then we also expect an increase in the number of achiasmate chromosomes (univalents) at diplonema. Consistent with this expectation, 3.0% of chromosome pairs in Trip13mod/mod cells were achiasmate compared to 1.1% in wild type (Figure 8D and 8E) (N = 1808 and 1083 bivalents, respectively; p = 0.0008, Fisher's exact test), similar to the frequency of pachytene bivalents lacking an MLH1 focus (3.8%). Interestingly, most of the separated univalents at diplonema (77.3%, N = 22 pairs) remained parallel in the spread nuclei (see insets in Figure 8D for examples), implying that some sort of physical connections persist between the homologs after SC disassembly. These connections might be COs that failed to mature into chiasmata (and that would perhaps have failed to accumulate MLH1). Alternatively, DNA catenation might hold the paired homologs together during the chromosome spreading process.
MLH1 foci were not detectable in pachytene-like spermatocytes from Trip13sev/sev mice (Figure 8F). This finding could mean that TRIP13 is essential for CO formation per se, but a more likely possibility is that mutant spermatocytes never reach the stage at which MLH1 foci appear (mid to late pachynema), because other mutants that fail to form a proper sex body arrest prior to mid-pachynema [e.g. [25],[30]]. To circumvent this complication, we investigated MLH1 focus formation in Trip13sev/sev oocytes, which do not normally carry out MSCI and which thus do not show the same pachytene arrest as spermatocytes in response to MSCI-defective mutations [36]. MLH1 foci were readily detected in Trip13sev/sev oocytes at pachynema (data not shown), indicating that TRIP13 is not essential for CO formation. However, Trip13sev/sev oocytes had fewer MLH1 foci than wild-type littermates (Figure 8G, p≤0.001, Mann-Whitney test), similar to but more severe than the situation in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes. This reduction is mainly attributable to an increase in the number of bivalents lacking an MLH1 focus (19.5% of bivalents in Trip13sev/sev (N = 231), vs. 10.6% in wild type (N = 273), p = 0.0055, Fisher's exact test) (Figure 8H).
The XY pair
At diplonema, 14.5% of Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes (N = 93) had achiasmate X and Y chromosomes, compared with 9.7% of wild-type cells (N = 31). This difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.7492, Fisher's exact test), although we do note that the difference in frequency (i.e., 4.8% higher in Trip13mod/mod) is of comparable magnitude to the difference in frequency of asynaptic XY pairs at pachynema (5.6% higher; see above). Thus, it may be the case that Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes have a modest XY chiasma defect comparable to the earlier XY synapsis defect, but larger sample sizes would be required to detect a difference this small. Importantly, this result suggests that, for sex chromosomes that successfully pair and synapse, subsequent chiasma formation is not substantially worse than for autosomes (see Discussion).
Cytological interference is altered in TRIP13-deficient spermatocytes
In most organisms, the presence of a meiotic CO in one genomic region makes it less likely that another CO will be found nearby [37]. This phenomenon, called CO interference, results in a wider and more even spacing of COs than expected if they were distributed randomly relative to one another [38], [39]. Direct measurement of CO interference is difficult in mice, and is currently impossible in sterile mouse mutants. However, interference can be measured cytologically by analyzing the distances separating pairs of adjacent MLH1 foci on pachytene chromosomes (Figure 9A) [38], [40]. When many such distances are examined, the strong interference typical of mammalian meiosis is readily seen: the relatively even spacing of MLH1 foci manifests as tight clustering of interfocus distances in frequency distribution plots (Figure 9B–9F, blue lines) and the steeply sigmoidal shape of cumulative frequency plots of the same data (Figure 9G–9K). Wide spacing is seen from the rarity of MLH1 focus pairs that are separated by short distances (e.g., only 0.3% of focus pairs were separated by ≤25% of the length of the bivalent) (Figure 9B and 9G).
Substantial interference was also observed in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes, as revealed by a relatively narrow distribution of interfocus distances and by the rarity of closely spaced foci (0.4% of focus pairs were separated by ≤25% of the bivalent length) (red in Figure 9B and 9G). A routinely used approach to quantifying cytological interference is to model MLH1 inter-focus distances to a gamma distribution [23], [38]. The gamma distribution that best fits the observed frequency distribution is characterized by a shape parameter (abbreviated “υ”), which can be regarded as a measure of the strength of interference between MLH1 foci: a value of υ = 1 implies no interference, whereas higher υ values indicate more regular spacing between foci, and thus stronger interference (Figure 9A). There appears to be a trend toward lower υ values in the Trip13mod/mod mutant (Table 4), which may indicate that MLH1 foci are less evenly spaced than in normal meiosis. However, this analysis confirms that substantial cytological interference is retained in the mutant.
Table 4. Gamma distribution parameters for MLH1 inter-focus distances.
Genotype | Chromosome rank | No. of intervals | υ (corrected)a |
Wild type | All chromosomes | 301 | 10.9 |
1–2 | 65 | 20.1 | |
3–5 | 82 | 15.2 | |
6–11 | 121 | 17.0 | |
12–16 | 30 | 7.9 | |
Trip13+/mod | All chromosomes | 246 | 12.6 |
1–2 | 52 | 21.2 | |
3–5 | 70 | 22.4 | |
6–11 | 97 | 13.6 | |
12–16 | 26 | 5.4 | |
Trip13mod/mod | All chromosomes | 240 | 9.2 |
1–2 | 54 | 14.1 | |
3–5 | 73 | 14.0 | |
6–11 | 86 | 11.9 | |
12–16 | 27 | 4.1 |
Best-fit gamma distribution shape parameters, corrected as described [38] for the fact that the gamma distribution assumes theoretical limits of infinitely small and infinitely large inter-focus distances, but the actual range of inter-focus distances that can be detected is limited by the resolution of light microscopy and by the finite length of each SC.
Nonetheless, closer inspection revealed an intriguing difference, namely, that there was a significant decrease in the average separation between MLH1 foci, from 60.8±13.4% of bivalent length in wild type to 56.8±13.8% in the mutant (mean ± sd; p<0.0007, two-sided t-test) (Figure 9B and 9G). Mean MLH1 focus separation in Trip13+/mod heterozygotes was indistinguishable from wild type (60.9±13.4%; data not shown). Expressing these measurements as percent of bivalent length corrects for the slightly shorter SCs in Trip13mod/mod cells (see above); the shift is much more pronounced if data are not normalized (Figure S1). Because different chromosomes show reproducible differences in CO distributions [e.g., [38],[41]], we further analyzed these data after dividing into groups of similarly sized chromosomes. Strikingly, the shift toward shorter interfocus distances was specific for the largest chromosomes (size ranks 1–5; Figure 9C, 9D, 9H, 9I). Thus, the altered interfocus distances are not a trivial consequence of the shorter SCs, because chromosomes of all size classes were affected equally by the decrease in SC length (Table 1).
CO distributions along chromosomes are altered in TRIP13-deficient spermatocytes
COs show biased distributions along chromosomes (reviewed in [42]), which at least in part reflects position-specific differences in the likelihood that a given recombination intermediate will become a CO [38]. Few mouse mutants have been found that alter the CO distribution without blocking the recombination process outright, but as detailed below, Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes show pronounced changes in the distribution of MLH1 foci, implicating TRIP13 in the processes that regulate CO position.
Distributions of MLH1 focus positions on pachytene spermatocyte autosomes are shown in Figure 10. Distances, measured along the SC from the centromere, are expressed as percent of SC length to normalize for the decreased length in Trip13mod/mod cells and to facilitate comparisons of different sized chromosomes. For all patterns discussed below, results were highly reproducible between wild type and Trip13+/mod heterozygotes (Figure S2; p = 0.51 for all chromosomes, Anderson-Darling two-sample test), so data for these genotypes were pooled for clarity.
Chromosomes show distinct MLH1 localization patterns depending on their size and whether a bivalent has one or two foci [38], [41], so similar-sized chromosomes were grouped for comparison. Normal cells show a number of characteristic features, as documented previously (e.g., refs. [40], [41]) (Figure 10, dark blue curves). First, MLH1 foci are rare in the centromere-proximal ∼15% of each bivalent. Second, chromosomes with two MLH1 foci tend to have those foci clustered into a proximal region and a distal region, with very few in between (Figure 10Ai, 10Bi, 10Ci), reflecting the wide spacing between COs caused by interference. Third, there is a greater chance that a focus will be centrally located when a chromosome has only a single MLH1 focus, although singleton foci can also occur in more proximal or more distal regions as well (Figure 10Aiii, 10Biii, 10Ciii, 10Diii). Finally, singleton MLH1 foci are more likely to be located distally on smaller chromosomes than on larger ones (e.g., compare Figure 10Aiii with Figure 10Ciii). Distal MLH1 localization appears to reflect a position-specific tendency for recombination events to favor (or not) a CO outcome [38] and, unlike patterns for chromosomes with two foci, cannot be accounted for simply as a consequence of wide spacing imposed by interference.
In Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes, CO repression near centromeres was intact, as inferred from the rarity of MLH1 foci within the first 15% of each chromosome (43 of 1021 foci in Trip13mod/mod (4.2%), compared with 99/2311 in wild type and Trip13+/mod (4.3%)) However, other patterns were altered such that the normal biases appeared relaxed (Figure 10, red curves, p = 0.0006, Anderson-Darling two-sample test). Larger chromosomes (size ranks 1–5) that had two foci showed less extreme biphasic clustering in the mutant, with foci occurring 2.3-fold more frequently than wild type in the central regions of the chromosomes (Figure 10Aii, p = 1.4×10−5, Fisher's exact test). Mid-size chromosomes (ranks 6–11 and 12–16) showed the same tendency, but differences were not statistically significant (Figure 10Bii and 10Cii, p≥0.23). Importantly, the fact that this alteration is seen on chromosomes with two foci argues against the possibility that distributions in the mutant are solely a consequence of a shift toward more chromosomes in the population having only one focus.
In addition, chromosomes in size ranks 12–16 with a single focus were more likely to have that focus in the central and proximal regions in Trip13mod/mod cells, at the expense of the normal preference for distally positioned foci (Figure 10Ciii and 10Civ, p = 0.0006). Chromosomes in size ranks 6–11 showed a similar pattern, but this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 10Biii and 10Biv, p = 0.07). The net effect of these alterations is that MLH1 foci, and presumably COs, are more evenly (i.e., randomly) distributed. Importantly, all size classes and both one-focus and two-foci chromosomes showed similar overall tendencies, albeit manifesting more markedly on some chromosomes than others.
Discussion
Budding yeast Pch2 has emerged from recent studies as a factor that promotes normal recombination patterns and other aspects of chromosome dynamics during normal meiosis, in addition to its initially identified role as a checkpoint factor. The mouse Pch2 ortholog, TRIP13, is required for completion of meiotic recombination, but specific details of the Trip13mod/mod phenotype suggested that functions of TRIP13 in mouse are very different from functions of Pch2 in yeast. In this work, we uncover new meiotic roles for TRIP13, taking advantage of two Trip13 mutations with different severity. TRIP13-deficient meiocytes display hallmarks of both early and late recombination defects: reduced RAD51 focus formation, inefficient completion of recombination, reduced numbers of COs and chiasmata, and altered CO distributions. These defects provide the first evidence for an early function of TRIP13 in meiotic recombination and also implicate TRIP13 in recombination pathways that lead to both COs and NCOs. We also demonstrate that TRIP13 is required for completion of synapsis and for formation of structurally normal SC. Thus, TRIP13 is important both for normal recombination and for development of higher order chromosome structure in mouse, which is reminiscent of at least some Pch2 roles in yeast [9], [14], [15]. Although not all aspects of the mutant phenotypes are congruent in the two species, our results in conjunction with recent studies of HORMAD protein localization [20], suggest that there is greater conservation of TRIP13/Pch2 function than was previously apparent.
TRIP13 is required at an early step(s) in meiotic recombination and is involved in recombination pathways leading to both COs and NCOs
Previous studies [16] and those reported here demonstrate that Trip13mod/mod meiocytes inefficiently repair meiotic DSBs, as evidenced by abnormal persistence of several cytological markers (e.g., DMC1 (and possibly RAD51), γH2AX, BRCA1, and ATR) into late meiotic prophase. Intriguingly, however, the Trip13 mutants also display recombination defects much earlier in prophase, manifested as reduced numbers of foci that stain with an anti-RAD51 antibody during early leptonema through early zygonema. These findings are the first to situate TRIP13 function upstream of RAD51. In principle, the reduced focus numbers could mean that DSBs are reduced or delayed. However, in both Trip13 mutants, DMC1 foci, RPA foci, and γH2AX appeared in early leptonema, i.e., with similar timing with respect to axial element formation as wild type. Moreover, γH2AX levels were similar between wild type and TRIP13-deficient cells, and RPA foci were more numerous in the mutants at leptonema. We therefore favor the interpretation that DSBs are generated and resected in relatively normal numbers and in a timely fashion in the mutants, and that TRIP13 is required (directly or indirectly) for efficient execution of recombination steps at or prior to loading of RAD51 onto resected DSB ends. DMC1 loading is not affected, however. Interestingly, Brca1 mutant spermatocytes have also been reported to be specifically defective for assembly of RAD51 but not DMC1 foci [43], suggesting that TRIP13 function may be related to that of BRCA1. These results are in contrast to those with Brca2 or Tex15 mutant spermatocytes, which are defective for both RAD51 and DMC1 foci [34], [44], thus defining two classes of proteins that can be differentiated based on recombinase loading.
The numbers of DMC1 (and possibly RAD51) foci that persist in pachynema in the Trip13 mutants (≥100 per cell) are in large excess over the number of recombination events that become COs in normal or Trip13mod/mod meiosis (∼20–25 per cell). The simplest interpretation is that most of the persistent foci represent sites of recombination intermediates that would have been resolved as NCOs (or intersister events) if they had been able to go to completion. Thus, a major function of TRIP13 is efficient execution of a NCO recombination pathway(s) [16]. However, close analysis revealed that Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes displayed fewer MLH1 foci at pachynema and more achiasmate autosome pairs at diplonema. The achiasmate frequency matched the frequency of pachytene autosomes that lacked an MLH1 focus, suggesting that this problem occurs even in those cells that escaped pachytene arrest because they had succeeded in repairing all of their DSBs. Trip13sev/sev pachytene oocytes also had fewer MLH1 foci. These findings suggest that TRIP13 is not absolutely required for CO or chiasma formation, but is needed for formation of wild-type numbers of COs and/or chiasmata as well as efficient formation of the obligate CO/chiasma. Importantly, these results reveal that the function of TRIP13 is not restricted solely to recombination pathways that lead to NCOs.
TRIP13 influences crossover distributions
Cytological interference between MLH1 foci remains strong in Trip13mod/mod pachytene spermatocytes, but we observed a significant decrease in the average distance between pairs of adjacent MLH1 foci. This decrease was seen even when normalizing for decreased SC length, and was more pronounced for longer chromosomes even though all chromosomes showed equivalent reductions in SC length. Thus, it appears that the interference alteration is not readily explained as a trivial consequence of shortened SCs. It is thought that chromosome axes serve as the conduit for signals that mediate interference [45], [46]. Thus, one interpretation of our findings is that the strength of interference decays more rapidly with distance along chromosomes in TRIP13-defective cells as a consequence of altered properties of axes and/or other higher order chromosome structures.
Strikingly, the distribution of MLH1 foci along chromosomes is altered in Trip13mod/mod mutant spermatocytes, with the general effect that positional biases seen in wild type were less pronounced in the mutant. This is an unusual phenotype—to our knowledge, the only other mouse mutations reported to cause large-scale alterations in focus positions are hypomorphic alleles of Mre11 or Nbs1 [47]. The tendency of larger chromosomes to have interstitial regions “filled in” when there were two MLH1 foci on a bivalent could reflect the decreased average interference distance discussed above. However, interfocus distances are not relevant when considering chromosomes with single foci, and such chromosomes also showed a tendency toward more even distributions. We thus infer that the altered MLH1 focus distributions are not simply a consequence of altered interference. Instead, we speculate that the shortened SCs, altered interference distances, and altered CO distributions are all separate outcomes of a common underlying defect, i.e., altered axis structure. Recent studies of chromosome structure mutants in C. elegans provide precedent for such linked defects [45], [46], [48].
TRIP13 is required for normal development of higher-order chromosome structures
TRIP13 is needed for formation of complete, structurally normal SC, as indicated by three defects in Trip13 mutants. First, and most strikingly, three quarters of the autosomal bivalents from Trip13sev/sev mutant spermatocytes and oocytes showed substantial synaptic anomalies, especially pericentric forks. In human spermatocytes, pericentric regions often show delayed synapsis, indicating that SC elongation across these regions is slow or inefficient [49]. TRIP13 may be especially important for SC formation in such “difficult” regions. Possible molecular functions for TRIP13 in this process could include promoting efficient assembly of SC components, remodeling chromosome axes to a form permissive for SC elongation, or indirectly promoting SC formation via effects on recombination.
A second defect is that SCs were shorter on average in Trip13mod/mod spermatocytes than in wild type. The Trip13mod allele thus joins a growing list of mouse mutations that alter the lengths of SC and/or chromosome axes, including Smc1β–/– (shorter SCs) [50], and Sycp3–/– and Spo11+/–Atm–/– (longer SCs) [23], [51]. The cause(s) of altered lengths in these mutants is not known, but could involve changes in number and length of chromatin loops that emanate from chromosome axes, or changes in the longitudinal compaction of bases of chromatin loops [52].
Third, TRIP13 is needed for depletion of HORMADs from chromosome axes soon after synapsis [20] (Figure 5). Effects of TRIP13 on the structure of chromosome axes is a possible unifying theme for the SC defects in the mutants, which, as discussed above, may also connect other aspects of TRIP13 function.
Conservation of TRIP13/Pch2 roles in recombination and chromosome structure
Thus far, budding yeast and mouse are the only organisms in which Pch2/TRIP13 is known to be required during normal meiosis, and there are a number of similarities—and some interesting differences—between the meiotic phenotypes of mutants in the two species. (Although currently available data do not indicate roles for PCH2 orthologs in unperturbed meiosis in C. elegans or D. melanogaster, it is possible that such roles may emerge upon further study.) Importantly, Pch2/TRIP13 is required in both yeast and mouse for normal meiotic recombination. In yeast, CO interference is weakened and closely spaced double crossovers occur more frequently than normal [14], [15], and in mouse, we find that inter-CO distances tend to be shorter. Both organisms show defects in forming an obligate CO/chiasma [15]. Additionally, pch2 mutant yeast show defects at multiple steps in recombination, including early steps at or prior to DSB resection, although possible roles of Pch2 in efficient assembly of Rad51 or Dmc1 complexes have not been examined in yeast [9], [12]–[15].
Comparisons between the two species are more complicated when considering effects of Pch2/TRIP13 deficiency on CO numbers. By tetrad analysis, some genetic intervals in yeast show increased crossing over in pch2 mutants [14], [15]. On its face, this pattern appears different from that in mouse, where we observed globally reduced CO numbers (MLH1 foci). However, the following points are noteworthy. First, not all intervals in yeast had increased crossing over, as some were unchanged in a pch2 mutant [14]. Second, pch2 mutation caused decreased CO numbers in some (but not all) intervals in a strain background that experiences fewer DSBs globally because of a hypomorphic spo11 mutation [15]. Third, CO formation was reduced and delayed when assayed by direct physical analysis of DNA at the HIS4LEU2 recombination hotspot [9]. Finally, our analysis of MLH1 focus distributions suggests that many genomic regions in mouse experience an increase in CO frequency in Trip13 mutants, even though global numbers are decreased (Figure 10). Thus, although it is not yet clear whether pch2/Trip13 mutations cause entirely congruent defects in crossing over in yeast and mouse, both organisms nonetheless are seen to have regionally variable alterations in CO number and placement.
Pch2/TRIP13 is also required in both organisms for normal dynamics of higher order chromosome structures, especially depletion of Hop1/HORMADs from all (mouse) or a subset (yeast) of axes where synapsis has occurred [9], [20]. Both organisms also show altered SC length, albeit with opposite directions for the net change (SCs are longer in pch2 mutant yeast [14]).
The available data thus strongly support the conclusion that the mammalian and yeast proteins have roles in multiple aspects of both meiotic recombination and the development of higher order chromosome structures that are themselves closely integrated with recombination. These findings suggest that many specific roles of Pch2/TRIP13 are more widely conserved than previously appreciated.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
Experiments conformed to relevant regulatory standards and were approved by the MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Mutant mice
Mouse embryonic stem cell lines RRB047 (Baygenomics, USA) and CH0621 (Sanger Institute, UK) (both cell lines from strain 129/Ola) were used to generate the Trip13 mutant strains in this study. These cell lines contain a gene trap located in the second (CH0621) or third (RRB047) intron of the Trip13 gene, both of which create an in-frame fusion of TRIP13 and a β-geo reporter. The exact locations of the gene traps were determined by PCR and subsequent sequencing of the Trip13 locus. The ES cell lines were injected into blastocysts and transferred to pseudo-pregnant mice. Colonies derived from the resulting chimeric mice were maintained with a C57Bl/6×129/Sv mixed background. To minimize variability from strain background, experimental animals were compared to controls from the same litter or from the same matings involving closely related parents. Genotyping was performed by PCR of tail tip DNA as previously described [19], with the following conditions: 2 min at 94°C, then 40 cycles of 20 s at 94°C, 30 s at 59°C, and 35 s at 72°C. The Trip13mod allele was detected with primers TRIP13 GeNo F4 (5′-CGGGCCCTATCTTTTCAGTTCC), TRIP13 GeNo R5 (5′-CTATAGTGCCCTTAGGCTCAGG), and RRB047 End F2 (5′-TAACCCACTCGTGCACCCAACT), which amplify fragments of 1115 bp for the wild-type allele and 1253 bp for the mutant. The Trip13sev allele was scored using primers SIGTR621 F2 (5′-CTCAGAGAAGACCCAAAGCACAGT), SIGTR621 R2 (5′-CCAGGGCACATCAGTAGGAAGC), and RRB047 End F4 (5′-GCGGTTAGCTCCTTCGGTCCTC), yielding amplification products of 319 bp for wild type and 642 bp for mutant.
RNA and protein expression analysis
RNA from adult and juvenile mouse testes was obtained using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and cDNA was produced using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) using oligo dT as primers. Trip13 transcripts were amplified using the primers TRIP13 2A (5′-TGCAGCGCAGCGGAAGCACTGC) and TRIP13 1B (5′-CCACTGAGGCCCTCACTCTTCCTT), which amplify most of the full-length transcript. β-actin was amplified as a control using primers β-actin1 (5′-AGGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACG) and β-actin2 (5′-ATCTACGAGGGCTATGCTCTC). RNA in situ hybridization was performed on testis sections as described [53], using a 416-bp fragment of the Trip13 transcript amplified using primers TRIP13 1A (5′-GTTTGTTCTGATTGATGAGGTGGA) and TRIP13 1B and labeled with [α32P]-UTP.
To separate different cell types using FACS, testes from adult mice were processed as described elsewhere [54]. Briefly, cells were liberated from testes by enzymatic treatment with collagenase, trypsin and DNase, then the resulting cell suspension was stained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) and cells were sorted using a MoFlo cytometer (Dako) with a 350 nm argon laser. Different cell types were separated based on DNA content and chromatin complexity [54]. Cellular composition was confirmed by spreading and immunofluorescence (data not shown).
Cytology and histology
For cytology, testes from 2–4 month-old mice were prepared for surface spreading and sectioning as previously described [23], [55]. Prenatal ovaries were collected from 18.5–20.5 days post-coitum embryos and processed to obtain oocyte spreads as described [55]. Ovaries from 21-day-old mice were also recovered for histological analysis as described [19]. Immunofluorescence was performed using previously described methods [56] and antibodies [20], [23]. Additional primary antibodies used were goat anti-ATR (Santa Cruz), 1∶130 dilution; rabbit anti-BRCA1 (generously provided by C. Deng, NIH) [57], 1∶200 dilution; rabbit anti-RPA (generously provided by P. Cohen, Cornell University), 1∶100 dilution; and a rabbit anti-DMC1 (Santa Cruz, H-100), 1∶300 dilution. For RAD51, DMC1, RPA, and MLH1 focus counts, nuclei were staged using the extent of SYCP3 staining and synapsis as markers for meiotic prophase progression. Only foci that co-localized with the chromosome axes were counted. SC length and distances between the MLH1 foci on the SCs were evaluated as previously described [23].
Statistical tests were as described in the text. Mann-Whitney tests were applied to MLH1 focus numbers to avoid assuming normal distribution, but similar conclusions about statistical significance were obtained if Student t-tests were performed. To evaluate differences between wild type and mutants for MLH1 focus distributions along chromosomes without prior assumptions about the shape of those distributions, we used the Anderson-Darling k-sample test (from the “adk” package in R, version 2.9.2) [58], [59]. (Note that the goal was not to compare means of these distributions, but to compare their overall shape). Similar conclusions about significance of the difference between wild type and Trip13mod/mod homozygotes, and about the lack of significance of difference between wild type and Trip13+/mod heterozygotes, were obtained if the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used instead (data not shown).
For histological analysis, testis and ovarian sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) using hematoxylin as a counterstain. TUNEL staining was performed as previously described [60]. Staging of the PAS-stained testis sections was performed as described elsewhere [61].
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Willie Mark from the Mouse Genetics Core Facility, Mesruh Turkekul and Katia Manova from the Molecular Cytology Core Facility, and members of the Laboratory of Comparative Pathology (MSKCC) for helping with histology. We thank Philippe Bois (Scripps Florida) for protocols and advice on flow sorting and the MSKCC FACS core facility for assistance carrying out the sorting. We are also grateful to the many colleagues who generously provided antibodies and to Liisa Kauppi and other members of the Keeney lab and Francesca Cole for insightful comments and suggestions.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 HD040916 (to MJ and SK). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Keeney S. Spo11 and the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. In: Lankenau DH, editor. Recombination and meiosis. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007. pp. 81–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hochwagen A, Amon A. Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr Biol. 2006;16:R217–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roeder GS. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2600–2621. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zickler D, Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:603–754. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zickler D. From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma. 2006;115:158–174. doi: 10.1007/s00412-006-0048-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kleckner N. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma. 2006;115:175–194. doi: 10.1007/s00412-006-0055-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.San-Segundo PA, Roeder GS. Pch2 links chromatin silencing to meiotic checkpoint control. Cell. 1999;97:313–324. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80741-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mitra N, Roeder GS. A novel nonnull ZIP1 allele triggers meiotic arrest with synapsed chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2007;176:773–787. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.071100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borner GV, Barot A, Kleckner N. Yeast Pch2 promotes domainal axis organization, timely recombination progression, and arrest of defective recombinosomes during meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:3327–3332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711864105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhalla N, Dernburg AF. A conserved checkpoint monitors meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2005;310:1683–1686. doi: 10.1126/science.1117468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Joyce EF, McKim KS. Drosophila PCH2 Is Required for a Pachytene Checkpoint That Monitors Double-Strand-Break-Independent Events Leading to Meiotic Crossover Formation. Genetics. 2009;181:39–51. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.093112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hochwagen A, Tham WH, Brar GA, Amon A. The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity. Cell. 2005;122:861–873. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu HY, Burgess SM. Two distinct surveillance mechanisms monitor meiotic chromosome metabolism in budding yeast. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2473–2479. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Joshi N, Barot A, Jamison C, Borner GV. Pch2 links chromosome axis remodeling at future crossover sites and crossover distribution during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zanders S, Alani E. The pch2Delta mutation in baker's yeast alters meiotic crossover levels and confers a defect in crossover interference. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li XC, Schimenti JC. Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (Trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahmed EA, de Rooij DG. Staging of mouse seminiferous tubule cross-sections. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;558:263–277. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van den Hurk R, Zhao J. Formation of mammalian oocytes and their growth, differentiation and maturation within ovarian follicles. Theriogenology. 2005;63:1717–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, et al. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:737–742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406212102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, et al. Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fukuda T, Daniel K, Wojtasz L, Toth A, Hoog C. A novel mammalian HORMA domain-containing protein, HORMAD1, preferentially associates with unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes. Exp Cell Res. 2009;316:158–171. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Perry J, Palmer S, Gabriel A, Ashworth A. A short pseudoautosomal region in laboratory mice. Genome Res. 2001;11:1826–1832. doi: 10.1101/gr.203001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barchi M, Roig I, Di Giacomo M, de Rooij DG, Keeney S, et al. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM. The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:207–216. doi: 10.1038/nrg2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc'his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, et al. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:263–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Ellis PJ, Mitchell MJ, Burgoyne PS. Pachytene asynapsis drives meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and leads to substantial postmeiotic repression in spermatids. Dev Cell. 2006;10:521–529. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet. 2001;27:271–276. doi: 10.1038/85830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Plug AW, Xu J, Reddy G, Golub EI, Ashley T. Presynaptic association of Rad51 protein with selected sites in meiotic chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:5920–5924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moens PB, Chen DJ, Shen Z, Kolas N, Tarsounas M, et al. Rad51 immunocytology in rat and mouse spermatocytes and oocytes. Chromosoma. 1997;106:207–215. doi: 10.1007/s004120050241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij DG, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7203–7215. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7203-7215.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tarsounas M, Morita T, Pearlman RE, Moens PB. RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:207–220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, Camerini-Otero RD. SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm–/– spermatocytes. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3233–3245. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Krogh BO, Symington LS. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:233–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang F, Eckardt S, Leu NA, McLaughlin KJ, Wang PJ. Mouse TEX15 is essential for DNA double-strand break repair and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:673–679. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200709057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Plug AW, Peters AH, Xu Y, Keegan KS, Hoekstra MF, et al. ATM and RPA in meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Nat Genet. 1997;17:457–461. doi: 10.1038/ng1297-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hunt PA, Hassold TJ. Sex matters in meiosis. Science. 2002;296:2181–2183. doi: 10.1126/science.1071907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hillers KJ. Crossover interference. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R1036–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.de Boer E, Stam P, Dietrich AJ, Pastink A, Heyting C. Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9607–9612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600418103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kleckner N, Zickler D, Jones GH, Dekker J, Padmore R, et al. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12592–12597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402724101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics. 1999;151:1569–1579. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Froenicke L, Anderson LK, Wienberg J, Ashley T. Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:1353–1368. doi: 10.1086/344714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kauppi L, Jeffreys AJ, Keeney S. Where the crossovers are: recombination distributions in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:413–424. doi: 10.1038/nrg1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xu X, Aprelikova O, Moens P, Deng CX, Furth PA. Impaired meiotic DNA-damage repair and lack of crossing-over during spermatogenesis in BRCA1 full-length isoform deficient mice. Development. 2003;130:2001–2012. doi: 10.1242/dev.00410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sharan SK, Pyle A, Coppola V, Babus J, Swaminathan S, et al. BRCA2 deficiency in mice leads to meiotic impairment and infertility. Development. 2004;131:131–142. doi: 10.1242/dev.00888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nabeshima K, Villeneuve AM, Hillers KJ. Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes. Genetics. 2004;168:1275–1292. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.030700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tsai CJ, Mets DG, Albrecht MR, Nix P, Chan A, et al. Meiotic crossover number and distribution are regulated by a dosage compensation protein that resembles a condensin subunit. Genes Dev. 2008;22:194–211. doi: 10.1101/gad.1618508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cherry SM, Adelman CA, Theunissen JW, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA, et al. The Mre11 complex influences DNA repair, synapsis, and crossing over in murine meiosis. Curr Biol. 2007;17:373–378. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mets DG, Meyer BJ. Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell. 2009;139:73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brown PW, Judis L, Chan ER, Schwartz S, Seftel A, et al. Meiotic synapsis proceeds from a limited number of subtelomeric sites in the human male. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:556–566. doi: 10.1086/468188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Hodges CA, Hunt PA, et al. Cohesin SMC1 beta is required for meiotic chromosome dynamics, sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:555–562. doi: 10.1038/ncb1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liebe B, Alsheimer M, Hoog C, Benavente R, Scherthan H. Telomere attachment, meiotic chromosome condensation, pairing, and bouquet stage duration are modified in spermatocytes lacking axial elements. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:827–837. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Novak I, Wang H, Revenkova E, Jessberger R, Scherthan H, et al. Cohesin Smc1beta determines meiotic chromatin axis loop organization. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:83–90. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200706136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Keeney S, Baudat F, Angeles M, Zhou ZH, Copeland NG, et al. A mouse homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic recombination DNA transesterase Spo11p. Genomics. 1999;61:170–182. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bastos H, Lassalle B, Chicheportiche A, Riou L, Testart J, et al. Flow cytometric characterization of viable meiotic and postmeiotic cells by Hoechst 33342 in mouse spermatogenesis. Cytometry A. 2005;65:40–49. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res. 1997;5:66–68. doi: 10.1023/a:1018445520117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Roig I, Liebe B, Egozcue J, Cabero L, Garcia M, et al. Female-specific features of recombinational double-stranded DNA repair in relation to synapsis and telomere dynamics in human oocytes. Chromosoma. 2004;113:22–33. doi: 10.1007/s00412-004-0290-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Turner JM, Aprelikova O, Xu X, Wang R, Kim S, et al. BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol. 2004;14:2135–2142. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. 2009. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
- 59.Scholz FW, Stephens MA. K-sample Anderson-Darling Tests. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:918–924. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell. 2000;6:989–998. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Russell LD. Clearwater. Cache River Press; 1990. Histological and histopathological evaluation of the testis: [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.