Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1971 Jul;50(7):1466–1472. doi: 10.1172/JCI106631

Measurement of cardiac output in man with a nonrecirculating indicator

Stephen M Wittenberg 1, Francis J Klocke 1, David G Greene 1, Ivan L Bunnell 1, Herman L Falsetti 1, Joseph A Zizzi 1
PMCID: PMC292086  PMID: 4932984

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate the utility of constant-rate injection of a nonrecirculating indicator (H2) for the measurement of cardiac output in man. 42 patients were studied during cardiac catheterization and 8 during acute complications of arteriosclerotic heart disease, including acute myocardial infarction. Pulmonary (or systemic) arterial H2 concentration was measured chromatographically from 2.0 ml blood samples drawn during constant-rate injection of dissolved H2 into the systemic venous circulation (or left heart). The chromatograph was a thermal conductivity unit housed in a constant-temperature water bath to achieve an improved signal-to-noise ratio. Intrapulmonary H2 elimination from mixed venous blood was measured directly in 14 patients and averaged 98 ±1.5% (SD). Reproducibility of output measurements was evaluated using triplicate determinations obtained over 45-60 sec in 25 consecutive patients. Coefficients of variation (SD/Mean × 100) averaged 3.4 ±2.0%, making it possible to evaluate relatively small changes in measured output with conventional statistical tests. Individual measurements could be repeated at 10-15 sec intervals. Comparisons of H2 and direct Fick measurements were made in 14 patients; H2 outputs averaged 106 ±4% (SEM) of Fick outputs (P > 0.1). Comparisons of H2 and dye dilution measurements were performed in an additional 24 patients. Seven had angiographically-negligible valvular regurgitation and dye outputs averaged 106 ±3% of H2 outputs (P > 0.1). 17 had moderate-to-severe regurigation and dye outputs averaged 91 ±4% of H2 outputs (P < 0.05), suggesting a small but systematic error due to undetected recirculation of dye. The H2 technique appears advantageous for rapidly repeated determinations of output, for quantitation of small changes in output, and for situations in which recirculation of conventional indicators is a potentially significant problem.

Full text

PDF
1466

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassingthwaighte J. B., Knopp T. J., Anderson D. U. Flow estimation by indicator dilution (bolus injection). Circ Res. 1970 Aug;27(2):277–291. doi: 10.1161/01.res.27.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHIDSEY C. A., 3rd, FRITTS H. W., Jr, HARDEWIG A., RICHARDS D. W., COURNAND A. Fate of radioactive kryton (Kr85) introduced intravenously in man. J Appl Physiol. 1959 Jan;14(1):63–66. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1959.14.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cropp G. J., Burton A. C. Theoretical considerations and model experiments on the validity of indicator dilution methods for measurements of variable flow. Circ Res. 1966 Jan;18(1):26–48. doi: 10.1161/01.res.18.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farhi L. E. Elimination of inert gas by the lung. Respir Physiol. 1967 Aug;3(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(67)90018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farhi L. E., Yokoyama T. Effects of ventilation-perfusion inequality on elimination of inert gases. Respir Physiol. 1967 Aug;3(1):12–20. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(67)90019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klocke F. J., Greene D. G., Koberstein R. C. Indicator-dilution measurement of cardiac output with dissolved hydrogen. Circ Res. 1968 Jun;22(6):841–853. doi: 10.1161/01.res.22.6.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levitt M. D. Production and excretion of hydrogen gas in man. N Engl J Med. 1969 Jul 17;281(3):122–127. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196907172810303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maseri A., Caldini P., Permutt S., Zierler K. L. Frequency function of transit times through dog pulmonary circulation. Circ Res. 1970 May;26(5):527–543. doi: 10.1161/01.res.26.5.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Oriol A., McGregor M. Indicator-dilution methods in estimation of cardiac output in clinical shock. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Dec;20(6):826–830. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90396-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oriol A., Sekelj P., McGregor M. Limitations of indicator-dilution methods in experimental shock. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Oct;23(4):605–608. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.23.4.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. RAHIMTOOLA S. H., SWAN H. J. CALCULATION OF CARDIAC OUTPUT FROM INDICATOR-DILUTION CURVES IN THE PRESENCE OF MITRAL REGURGITATION. Circulation. 1965 May;31:711–718. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.31.5.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ROCHESTER D. F., DURAND J., PARKER J. O., FRITTS H. W., Jr, HARVEY R. M. Estimation of right ventricular output in man using radioactive krypton (Kr85). J Clin Invest. 1961 Apr;40:643–648. doi: 10.1172/JCI104296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Samet P., Bernstein W. H., Castillo C. Validity of indicator-dilution determinations of cardiac output in patients with mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1966 Mar;33(3):410–416. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.33.3.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saunders K. B., Hoffman J. I., Noble M. I., Domenech R. J. A source of error in measuring flow with indocyanine green. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Feb;28(2):190–198. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.28.2.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Swan H. J., Ganz W., Forrester J., Marcus H., Diamond G., Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970 Aug 27;283(9):447–451. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197008272830902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES