Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Aug;62(8):2499–2509. doi: 10.1002/art.27554

Prolonged CD154 Expression on Pediatric Lupus CD4 T Cells Correlates with Increased CD154 Transcription, Increased NFAT Activity, and Glomerulonephritis

Jay Mehta 1, Anna Genin 2, Michael Brunner 3, Lisabeth V Scalzi 4, Nilamadhab Mishra 5, Timothy Beukelman 6, Randy Q Cron 7
PMCID: PMC2921031  NIHMSID: NIHMS207610  PMID: 20506525

Abstract

Objective

To assess CD154 expression in pediatric lupus and explore a transcriptional mechanism explaining dysregulated CD154 expression.

Methods

Cell surface CD154 expression was examined, pre- and post-activation, on peripheral blood CD4 T cells from 29 children with lupus and matched controls by flow cytometry. CD154 expression was correlated with clinical features, laboratory parameters, and treatments received. Increased CD154 expression on lupus CD4 T cells was correlated with CD154 message and transcription rates by real-time RT-PCR and nuclear run-on assays, respectively. NFAT transcriptional activity and NFAT mRNA levels in lupus CD4 T cells were explored by reporter gene analysis and real-time RT-PCR, respectively.

Results

CD154 surface protein levels were increased 1.44-fold on lupus CD4 T cells compared to controls at one day post-activation ex vivo. This increase correlated clinically with the presence of nephritis and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Increased CD154 protein also correlated with increased CD154 mRNA levels and rates of CD154 transcription, particularly at later time-points post-T cell activation. Reporter gene analyses revealed a trend for increased NFAT, but decreased AP-1 and similar NFκB, activity in lupus CD4 T cell compared to controls. Moreover, NFAT1 and, in particular, NFAT2 mRNA levels were notably increased in lupus CD4 T cells compared to controls.

Conclusion

Following activation, cell surface CD154 is increased on pediatric lupus CD4 T cells compared to controls, and this correlates with the presence of nephritis, increased CD154 transcription rates, and NFAT activity. These results suggest that NFAT/calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, may be beneficial in treating lupus nephritis.


The interaction between CD154 and CD40 is important for B cell development, antibody production by B cells, germinal center formation, IL-12 production, CD8 T cell effector function, and optimal T cell-dependent antibody responses (1). As might be expected from its role of driving multiple effector functions throughout the immune system, the expression of CD154 on CD4 T cells is normally very tightly regulated (2). Similar to activation-dependent CD4 T cell-derived cytokines, the tight regulation of CD154 in normal CD4 T cells likely occurs at the level of transcription (3). Disturbances in this regulation have been hypothesized to contribute to over-expression in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (4).

The role of CD154 over-expression on CD4 T cells in SLE was first demonstrated in lupus-prone mice (57). Numerous experiments have validated the role of this protein in the pathogenesis of human SLE. Over-expression of CD154 on T cells has also been demonstrated in adult SLE patients (8, 9). Based on these findings, clinical trials were conducted to study the effect of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in patients with SLE. Lipsky and colleagues reported SLE patients treated with anti-CD154 mAb showed disappearance of CD38-expressing antibody-secreting cells, not found in normal individuals, and significant improvement in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels, proteinuria, and disease activity scores (10). Though it was prematurely terminated due to unanticipated thromboembolic events, an open-label trial of anti-CD154 antibody in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis showed significant reduction in anti-dsDNA antibodies, increase in serum C3, and disappearance of hematuria (11). Nevertheless, treatment of SLE patients with anti-CD154 mAb is on hold, and other ways of disrupting dysregulated CD154 expression are under exploration.

Despite the strong evidence for CD154 over-expression on CD4 T cells contributing to the pathogenesis of SLE, it remains unclear why, or at what level, this increased and prolonged expression occurs. Examining lupus CD4 T cell lines exposed to anergy-inducing stimulation, Datta et al. found prolonged expression of strongly phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), a member of the MAPK family, and specifically inhibiting a kinase of ERK blocked the early and prolonged hyper-expression of CD154 (12). In contrast, Cedeno and colleagues found decreased enzymatic activity of ERK-1 and ERK-2 in resting SLE T cells, and suggested that there are upstream signaling defects leading to MAPK activation in lupus T cells (13). Thus, the defect leading to dysregulated CD154 expression in SLE remains unclear.

Multiple experiments have suggested the integral role of the transcription factor, nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), in CD154 mRNA production (14, 15), and it is possible that the over-expression of CD154 on T cells in lupus is NFAT-mediated. Along these lines, increased calcium flux, critical to NFAT signaling, in lupus T cells has been well established (16). Examining this possibility, Fujii et al. recently observed skewed NFAT1 activation (dephosphorylated) in patients with active SLE nephritis and pleuritis (17). Moreover, a recent article reported increased nuclear NFAT1 levels and NFAT binding to the CD154 promoter in SLE T cells, suggesting increased CD154 transcription contributes to CD154 over-expression in SLE (18).

By examining CD4 T cells from pediatric SLE patients, we sought to evaluate the factors involved in the dysregulation of CD154 expression. We corroborate the findings in adults that CD154 is over-expressed in pediatric SLE CD4 T cells at later time points post-activation, and this correlates with the presence of nephritis in these children. We also show that following activation ex vivo lupus CD4 T cells have increased CD154 mRNA levels and transcription rates, and this correlates with increased NFAT transcriptional activity and significantly increased NFAT2 mRNA levels. These results have important implications for the use of transcriptional inhibitors of NFAT (e.g., tacrolimus and cyclosporine) in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient populations. Children and young adults, ages 13–23 years, diagnosed with pediatric SLE before the age of 16 were recruited from the pediatric rheumatology clinic at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). Clinical features, laboratory results, and therapies utilized were abstracted from the clinical record (Table 1). For each SLE patient analyzed, CD4 T cells from a friend of the patient were analyzed at the same time, side-by-side. As close as possible, the friends were matched for age [median age of 16 years for both the SLE group (range, 13–21 years) and the controls (range, 13–23 years)], sex (27 of 29 pairs matched), and ethnicity (25 of 29 pairs matched). Statistically, the mean ages for the SLE group and the controls were 16.0 and 16.8 years, respectively. Since they were matched pairs, the Wilcoxon signed rank test showed the ages were statistically different (p = 0.01), but it is not anticipated that these small differences in age are pathophysiologically significant. In addition, as a disease control, CD4 T cells from six children (ages 14–16 years) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were studied for CD154 surface expression following T cell activation ex vivo. Lastly, 3 adult SLE patients (Wake Forest University) were studied for the nuclear run-on assay at time point 0 (Figure 3). Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from CHOP and Wake Forest University, respectively.

Table 1.

Lupus patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Pt # Age1 Sex Ethnicity2 SLEDAI1 Nephritis4 ESR1 Medications13
1 15 F AA 16 Y 48 HD-CS, Mmf
2 17 F AA 0 N 20 HD-CS, Cyc (q1m), Hcq
3 21 F AA 9 N N/A N/A
4 19 F AA 0 Y N/A N/A
5 18 F AA 5 N N/A MD-CS, Hcq, Asa, Cyc (q3m)
6 16 F AA 2 Y 27 HD-CS, Hcq, Cyc (q1m), coumadin
7 13 F C 4 N 23 MD-CS, Hcq, Asa
8 17 F AA 1 Y 65 HD-CS, Cyc (q1m), sertraline, OCP, pentamadine
9 17 F AA 9 Y N/A LD-CS, Mmf, sertraline, pentamadine, ondansetron
10 16 F C 8 Y 12 LD-CS, Hcq
11 16 F I 0 Y 9 LD-CS, Hcq, Asa
12 14 F EA 4 N 5 Asa, azathioprine, coumadin, cetirizine
13 18 F C 10 Y N/A LD-CS, Hcq, Asa, ranitidine
14 14 F C 6 Y N/A MD-CS, Hcq, Cyc (q1m), enalapril, pentamadine, isoretinoic acid
15 13 F AA 16 Y 70 HD-CS, Hcq, Asa, Cyc (q1m), pentamadine
16 16 F AA 21 Y 35 HD-CS, Hcq, Mtx
17 15 M C 4 N N/A MD-CS, Asa, Mmf, methylphenidate, loratadine, albuterol
18 15 F C 5 Y 0 LD-CS, Hcq, Cyc (q3m)
19 17 F C 4 N 4 LD-CS, Hcq, Asa
20 14 F AA 17 Y 18 MD-CS, Hcq, Asa, azathioprine, losartan, enalapril, fluticasone
21 17 F AA 2 N 10 LD-CS, Hcq
22 16 F C 2 Y 5 LD-CS, Hcq, Cyc (q3m)
23 15 M L N/A Y 2 Hcq, Mmf
24 13 F AA 4 Y 12 MD-CS, Hcq, Asa, enalapril
25 16 F EA 4 N 11 Hcq, azathioprine, coumadin
26 19 F L 12 N 27 LD-CS, Hcq, tacrolimus (topical), ranitidine
27 15 F AA 8 N 19 HD-CS, Hcq, Asa, Mmf
28 15 F AA 6 Y N/A MD-CS, Hcq, Asa, Mtx, fluticasone, salmeterol, ranitidine
29 16 F C N/A N 9 MD-CS, Hcq, Mmf
1

At time of study blood draw; N/A = not available

2

AA=African-American; C=Caucasian, I=Native Indian, EA=East Asian, L=Latino

3

LD-CS=equivalent of ≤5 mg prednisone daily; MD-CS=equivalent of >5 mg but ≤25 mg prednisone daily; HD-CS= equivalent of >25 mg prednisone daily; Mmf=mycophenylate mofetil; Cyc=IV cyclophosphamide (interval); Hcq=hydroxychloroquine; Asa=low-dose aspirin; Mtx=methotrexate

4

Y=a history of nephritis at any point while being followed at our institution

Figure 3. Increased CD154 mRNA levels and transcription rates in SLE CD4 T cells.

Figure 3

Means ± SEM of the ratios (SLE divided by matched controls) of CD154 mRNA levels and transcription rates (relative to GAPDH control) in CD4 T cells analyzed ex vivo (0–3 hours), and 4–6 and 20–24 (transcription rate only) hours following T cell activation. Sample sizes of n=4, except for the ex vivo time point of the transcription rate (n=3, adult SLE patients and controls).

Peripheral blood CD4 T cell isolation, activation ex vivo and flow cytometric (FCM) analysis

Peripheral blood was obtained via venipuncture by nursing staff in the General Clinical Research Center at CHOP. Primary CD4 T cells were isolated by negative selection as previously described (19). Populations studied were >90% CD4+ as assessed by FCM (Figure 1). Following CD4 T cell isolation, cells were analyzed ex vivo, or 6, or 20–24 hours following polyclonal activation with phorbol ester (PMA, 25 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and calcium ionophore (ionomycin, 1.5 µM; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). For FCM, CD4 T cells were stained with phyco-erythrin-conjugated anti-CD4 (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA), anti-CD25 (Becton-Dickinson), anti-CD69 (Caltag, Burlingame, CA), anti-CD154 (Ancell, Bayport, MN), or the immunoglobulin isotype control mAb (Ancell). Ten-thousand live cell-gated events were recorded with a FACScan and analyzed using CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson) as previously described (20).

Figure 1. Increased CD154 expression on SLE CD4 T cells 24 hours after activation.

Figure 1

CD4 T cells were isolated from PBMC from a single (as a representative example) SLE patient (bold lines) and side-by-side matched control individual (thin lines). Flow cytometry was performed on CD4 T cells ex vivo (left column), and following activation for 6 (middle column) or 24 (right column) hours post-polyclonal activation with PMA+ionomycin. Analyses of cell surface CD154 (top row), CD69 (middle row), and CD25 (bottom row) are depicted. CD4 expression, following negative selection, is shown in the upper left hand panel. For all panels, cell number is on the Y-axis, and fluorescence intensity is on the X-axis. Isotype control antibody staining is depicted with a dotted line.

Real-time RT-PCR analysis

mRNA was isolated (Trizol; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from CD4 T cells ex vivo, or at 6 hours post-activation with PMA and ionomycin in vitro, and cDNA was generated with reverse transcriptase. Message levels for NFAT1, NFAT2, and NFAT4, as well as GAPDH as a control, were determined by SYBR green incorporation as detected by real-time PCR (ABI Prism 7000, Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Waltham, MA) using published NFAT family member-specific primers (21) as previously described (22). Prior to analysis of patient samples, titrated melting (denaturing) curves were generated to optimize amplification conditions, and each amplified product was confirmed to yield a single product of the correct predicted size, based on the particular primer pair, as detected by ethidium bromide incorporation in agarose gels (see insert in Figure 5A).

Figure 5. Increased NFAT levels in SLE CD4 T cells.

Figure 5

A. Real-time RT-PCR was used to quantify NFAT1, NFAT2, NFAT4, and GAPDH (control) mRNA levels (analyzed in duplicate) from CD4 T cells of a representative patient (blue and purple curves) and matched control (green and red curves). The predicted sizes of the PCR products for each specific primer pair used to detect NFAT1, NFAT2, and NFAT4 message were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis (upper left insert). B. The mean ± SEM of ratios of SLE patient divided by matched control values for NFAT1 and NFAT2 message levels (corrected for loading by the control GAPDH message levels) are plotted (n=5).

Nuclear run-on assays

CD154 transcription rates were determined by an avidin-biotin-based nuclear run-on assay as described (23). In summary, nuclei were isolated from peripheral blood CD4 T cells ex vivo, or 4–6 or 20–24 hours following stimulation with PMA and ionomycin. Nuclei isolation was performed as previously described (24). For in vitro RNA synthesis and purification, one volume (100 µl) of a 2x transcription buffer [200 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 4 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 4 mM each of ATP, GTP and CTP, 200 mM sucrose, and 20% glycerol] was added to one volume (100 µl) of nuclei on ice. Next, 8 µl of biotin-16-UTP (from 10 mM tetralithium salt: #1388908, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 30 minutes at 29°C. The reaction was stopped by adding 6 µl of 250 mM CaCl2 and 6 µl of RNase-free DNase I (10 U/µl; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and incubating for 10 minutes at 29°C. RNA was purified as above and was re-suspended in 50 µl of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water.

Newly synthesized RNA, containing biotin-conjugated UTP, was extracted by first incubating with streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads (Dynabeads: #112.05, Dynal®, Invitrogen), previously washed per manufacturer’s instructions and suspended in binding buffer, for 20 minutes at 42°C and 2 hours at room temperature. Beads were separated with a magnetic device (Dynal), washed, and suspended in DEPC-treated water. cDNA was made from the bead using an Applied Biosystems Transcription Reagents Kit (cat # N808-0234) which contains Taqman Gold enzyme following manufacturers instructions for one cycle synthesis of RNA to cDNA using a traditional PCR engine (program was 25°C for 10 min, 48°C for 30 min, 95°C for 5 min, and 4°C indefinitely).

Real-time PCR was performed in triplicate samples to quantify the newly synthesized RNA (now cDNA) to obtain fold differences between patients and matched controls, using the latter as calibrators. The amplification primers for hCD154 are previously reported (20), and those for hGAPDH (endogenous control to normalize the CD154 RNA) are: forward-5’-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3’ and reverse-5’-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3’. Detection and quantification of amplified real-time PCR products by SYBR green incorporation was as previously described (20).

Transient transfection and reporter gene analyses

Freshly-isolated peripheral blood CD4 T cells were transiently transfected with 5 µg of various firefly luciferase reporter plasmids by Amaxa nucleofection (Gaithersburg, MD) as described (4). The AP-1-, NFAT-, and NFκB-responsive reporter plasmids have been previously reported (25). Following transfection, the cells were rested for 2 hours and then stimulated in vitro for 6 hours with PMA and ionomycin prior to luciferase detection as described (26). Transcription factor responsive reporter plasmid activity was corrected for transfection efficiency between patient and matched control sample using the pCMV-Luc plasmid activity as a reference control as previously detailed (25).

Statistical analyses

Based on Koshy et al. (8), we calculated a requirement of a sample size of 20 SLE patients and 20 matched controls to have the power (α=0.05) to detect a difference in CD154 expression between the populations with a confidence level of 0.90. To account for inter-assay variation in FCM analyses, the ratio of SLE/control values was calculated for each matched concurrent pair at each time point. Average MFI ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the geometric mean. Comparisons of raw values and SLE/control ratios were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Statistical analyses were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5 software (La Jolla, CA).

RESULTS

Activated CD4 T cells from pediatric SLE patients have increased cell surface expression of CD154 versus closely-matched controls

CD4 T cells from both SLE patients and age-, ethnicity-, and sex-matched controls, were examined side-by-side for CD154 expression, and CD25 and CD69 activation controls, by flow cytometry ex vivo and after stimulation with PMA+ionomycin for 6 and 24 hours. When comparing an individual SLE patient to his/her matched control (example in Figure 1), CD154 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) at 24 hours post-stimulation was, on average, 1.44x (95% confidence interval 1.19–1.72) higher in the SLE patient versus control (Figure 2A). A significant difference was also seen at 6 hours post-stimulation, with SLE T cell expression being 1.34x (95% CI 1.01–1.79) that of an individual control. No significant difference was seen at 0 hours (Figure 2A). In contrast to CD154 expression, there was no significant difference between patients and controls seen at any time points for CD25 and CD69 expression (Figure 2A) similar to what has been seen in adult SLE patients (6, 8). The increase in CD154 expression on the SLE CD4 T cells did have some disease specificity in that CD154 expression after 24 hours of stimulation in the JIA group was significantly less than SLE group (median 418 vs 736; Wilcoxon rank-sum, p = 0.02; Figure 2B).

Figure 2. Increased CD154 expression on SLE CD4 T cells 24 hours after activation is higher than controls, and is associated with nephritis and elevated ESR.

Figure 2

A. The means and 95% confidence intervals are shown for the ratios (SLE patient values divided by the side-by-side controls, n=29) of CD154 (top graph), CD25 (middle graph), and CD69 (bottom graph) expression on CD4 T cells ex vivo (left means), and 6 (middle means) and 24 (right means) hours after T cell activation. B. The mean ± SEM values of CD154 MFI expression on CD4 T cells after 24 hours of activation are shown for the SLE (n=29) and JIA disease control (n=6) groups. C. The individual matched SLE to control ratios for CD154 expression at 24 hours post activation are plotted in relation to the presence or absence of nephritis (left graph), or whether or not the SLE patient ESR is elevated closest to the time of the analysis (right graph).

A history of SLE nephritis is associated with increased CD154 expression on CD4 T cells at 24 hours

The strong association of increased CD154 expression on SLE CD4 T cells following 24 hours of activation was analyzed for clinical associations among the SLE cohort. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data (Table 1) that showed no association with CD154 levels included prednisone dose, whether or not a patient was receiving specific medications (hydroxychloroquine, any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, or specifically cytoxan), SLEDAI (SLE disease activity index) score, C3, C4, absolute lymphocyte count, or history of central nervous systems manifestations of SLE. However, for the 12 patients who had a history of biopsy-proven SLE glomerulonephritis at some point throughout their disease course, there were significantly higher CD154 levels at 24 hours compared to their respective controls than did those 9 SLE subjects without a history of nephritis (Figure 2C, p=.01). Similarly, for the 3 SLE subjects who had an elevated sedimentation rate (>20 mm/hr) at the blood draw closest to their date (generally within one month) of their CD154 measurement, there were significantly higher CD154 levels at 24 hours compared to their respective controls than did those 13 SLE subjects with a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p=.0004). Thus, elevated CD154 expression on SLE CD4 T cells following 24 hours of activation was strongly correlated with the presence of glomerulonephritis and with elevated ESR.

SLE CD4 T cells have increased CD154 mRNA levels and transcription rates

To assess the etiology of increased CD154 surface expression on SLE CD4 T cells, real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was used to quantify CD154 and GAPDH message levels in 4 patients and matched controls. After correcting for starting RNA by GAPDH, increased CD154 mRNA levels were seen when comparing a SLE patient to his/her individual control (Figure 3). This was seen both ex vivo and at 6 hours post T cell stimulation with PMA+ionomycin. In these same patients, nuclear run-on assays were used to quantify transcription rates at 6 and 20–24 hours post-activation. Increased CD154 transcription rates were seen in SLE patients, when compared to their individual controls, at all time points, particularly at the later 20–24 hour time point (Figure 3). Thus, the increased CD154 cell surface expression on SLE CD4 T cells correlated with notably elevated rates of CD154 transcription.

Increased NFAT activity and increased NFAT levels, in particular NFAT2, are seen in SLE CD4 T cells

Using luciferase reporter plasmids and polyclonally stimulating CD4 T cells in vitro from SLE patients and matched controls, transcriptional activity for NFAT, AP-1, and NFκB were measured and corrected for transfection efficiency. Each SLE patient was compared to his/her control, and the log of the ratio was plotted such that increased transcription factor activity in the lupus patient relative to the matched control was greater than 0 (above the line) and less than 0 (below the line) when the SLE transcription factor activity was less than the matched control (Figure 4A). There was a clear trend for most paired comparisons demonstrating increased NFAT activity in the SLE CD4 T cells relative to controls (Figure 4B, p = 0.057). By contrast, AP-1 activity appeared to be mostly decreased (below the line) in SLE CD4 T cells relative to controls, and NFκB activity was similar on average (Figure 4B). Thus, there was a relative increase in NFAT activity for most SLE patients compared to controls.

Figure 4. Increased NFAT transcriptional activity in SLE CD4 T cells.

Figure 4

A. The log of the ratios (SLE divided by matched control, corrected for transfection efficiency) of transcription factor activities in polyclonally activated CD4 T cells is depicted for the individual matched pairs (n=10) analyzing NFAT (left), AP-1 (middle), and NFκB (right) activities, such that increased activity in the lupus patient relative to the control plots above the line (>0), and decreased activity falls below the line (<0). B. The means ± SEM of the ratios (from the 10 matched groups) is plotted for the individual transcription factor activities analyzed.

Using real-time RT-PCR and probes specific for NFAT1, NFAT2, and NFAT4, we sought to further characterize increased NFAT activity in SLE CD4 T cells versus controls in 5 pairs (example in Figure 5A). Both NFAT1 and NFAT2 levels were increased, but those of NFAT2 were markedly higher than that of controls (Figure 5B). NFAT4 levels were, for the most part, undetectable, consistent with NFAT4 being primarily present in thymocytes (27). Therefore, NFAT1 levels were increased in SLE CD4 T cells relative to controls, similar to prior studies showing increased NFAT1 in the nucleus (17, 18) of SLE CD4 T cells. Interestingly, NFAT2 levels were substantially elevated in SLE CD4 T cells likely reflecting increased NFAT activity since NFAT2 transcription is positively regulated by NFAT engagement of the NFAT2 transcriptional promoter (28, 29).

DISCUSSION

We present the first evidence in children with SLE, as compared to controls, that CD154 is over-expressed on activated CD4 T cells (Figure 1, Figure 2A, Figure 2B), similar to results seen in adult studies (8, 9, 30). This increased CD154 expression was specific, as there was no difference in expression of activation markers, CD25 and CD69 (Figure 2A), similar to what was shown in adults with SLE (8, 9). These increased CD154 levels correspond to increased CD154 mRNA levels and rates of transcription, especially at late (24 hours) time points following CD4 T cell activation (Figure 3). Although this does not formally rule out a role for potential increased CD154 mRNA stability in SLE (31), the increased CD154 transcription rates at late time points post-activation are markedly elevated and strongly suggest increased CD154 transcription at later time points post-activation contribute to increased CD154 expression on SLE CD4 T cells.

CD154 transcription is normally highly dependent upon NFAT activity following T cell activation (14), and, relative to controls, there was a clear trend towards increased NFAT activity in CD4 T cells from most SLE patients (Figure 4). In contrast, AP-1 activity was decreased, and NFκB activity was similar on average (Figure 4). Thus, there was a relative increase in NFAT activity for most SLE patients relative to controls. This is not surprising given the known increased flux of intracellular calcium seen in SLE T cells (16), and the dependence of NFAT on prolonged calcium signaling to activate calcineurin, which, in turn, dephosphorylates NFAT and helps shuttle it to the nucleus where it binds target genes like CD154 (32). In addition, others have shown increased NFAT1 levels and DNA binding activity in SLE T cells (17, 18).

We also identified increased NFAT1 levels in SLE patients, but the levels of NFAT2 were more dramatically elevated in SLE patients compared to controls (Figure 5). NFAT1 is found constitutively in resting T cell cytoplasm (25, 33), but the inducible isoform of NFAT2 is upregulated by NFAT itself (28, 29). Following T cell activation, there is a relative switch in abundance from NFAT1 to NFAT2, and NFAT2 has been suggested to be the NFAT family member essential for effector T cell development and function (28). Conversely, NFAT2 levels are decreased in FOXP3-expressing regulatory CD4 T cells, and this is due to the FOXP3 transcription factor directly binding to and inhibiting the NFAT2 transcriptional promoter (34). The increased NFAT2 levels in CD4 T cells from SLE patients may thus represent a more mature/effector T cell phenotype. As NFAT2 quickly becomes the predominant NFAT family member in activated T cells, it may be the most likely NFAT family member involved in the later wave of CD154 transcription.

In contrast to elevated NFAT activity, our finding of decreased AP-1 and similar or lower NFκB activity, relative to controls, is consistent with similar findings (35, 36) in adults, and it is known that these transcription factors are necessary for interleukin-2 (IL-2) production, which is decreased in SLE T cells (37). The AP-1 deficiency is thought to be due to the transcriptional repressor CREM, which is expressed in increased amounts in SLE T cells, binding to the promoter of c-fos and suppressing its transcription (37). Normally, c-fos combines with c-jun to produce the dimeric transcription factor, AP-1, which combines with NFAT on the IL-2 promoter, thusly contributing to transcriptional activation. The decreased NFκB activity likely stems from a p65 subunit deficiency, which is of unclear etiology (37). However, what does seem to be more evident is that calcium flux and associated NFAT activity are increased in lupus CD4 T cells and likely contribute to CD154 over-expression and SLE pathogenesis (16).

The CD154-CD40 interaction appears to have a particular role in the pathogenesis of SLE nephritis. In addition to the studies demonstrating improvement in hematuria (11) and proteinuria (10) in patients with SLE glomerulonephritis treated with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody, CD40 expression was shown to be up-regulated in renal cells from patients with class III and IV nephritis (38). CD154-activated monocytes were shown to stimulate the glomerular inflammatory response (39). Moreover, multiple mouse experiments are supportive of the role of CD154 in models of SLE nephritis (5, 7, 40). Potential mechanisms for the role of CD154 in SLE nephritis include chronic stimulation of CD40 expressing renal parenchymal cells (e.g., endothelial, mesangial, and distal tubular cells) (38). Alternatively, prolonged CD154 expression and stimulation of B cells likely contributes to increased autoantibody production (e.g., anti-double stranded DNA) that may contribute to the renal lesion.

Here, we demonstrate that patients who, at some point during their disease course, developed SLE nephritis had significantly higher CD154 levels at 24 hours than patients who did not, when compared to their respective controls (Figure 2C). It is unclear whether the higher CD154 levels signify a more active generalized disease state which, in turn, leads to nephritis, or higher CD154 expression signifies a specific propensity to develop nephritis, independent of other disease manifestations. Along these lines, others have shown that CD134 expression on SLE CD4 T cells is associated with nephritis (41). Nevertheless, the finding that the development of CNS lupus, which is also a potentially severe disease manifestation, did not influence CD154 expression suggests that increased CD154 expression does not simply signify a more active generalized disease state. Thus, there may be a role for specifically targeting CD154 for treatment of lupus nephritis. Because a monoclonal antibody approach to CD154, although effective, has been complicated by unanticipated clotting abnormalities (42), other means of targeting dysregulated CD154 expression are in order (43).

Cyclosporin A (CsA) blocks the phosphatase activity of calcineurin, and, therefore, prevents the nuclear translocation of NFAT. As CD154 over-expression has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of SLE, our demonstration that NFAT mediates this over-expression in children renders CsA an attractive potential agent in the treatment of lupus. To date, the published experience with this agent in childhood SLE consists of two prospective studies (44, 45) and an open-randomized comparison of CsA versus corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide (46), all of which showed varying degrees of improvement in disease manifestations, particularly proteinuria. The lack of a controlled clinical trial of this medication in lupus likely reflects its adverse effect profile, which consists of nephrotoxicity and reversible hypertension. In vitro and ex vivo experiments investigating CsA’s effect on CD4 T cell CD154 expression in lupus have been inconclusive (12, 17, 18). We argue that the presence of an established therapeutic agent which acts on a demonstrated substrate of SLE pathogenesis strongly warrants a controlled clinical trial of CsA’s efficacy in SLE, particularly those with nephritis.

Tacrolimus is a newer, more potent, medication which also acts on the calcineurin-NFAT pathway (32) and, therefore, is potentially efficacious in SLE. In topical form, it has demonstrated efficacy as a treatment for cutaneous manifestations of lupus (47), and a small open-label trial of oral tacrolimus in patients with pediatric-onset lupus nephritis demonstrated efficacy in almost all the studied patients (48). In addition, Hogan, Wagner, and colleagues (49) have identified a small organic molecule which selectively interferes with the interaction between calcineurin and NFAT, and unlike CsA or tacrolimus, does not block all downstream signaling of calcineurin. Such agents with greater specificity for the aberrant pathways in autoimmune disease have the potential to be as, or more, efficacious, with fewer adverse effects than current agents which are less discriminating in their targets.

In summary, like adults with SLE (8, 9, 30), pediatric SLE patients also demonstrate increased CD154 expression on CD4 T cells, particularly at later time points post activation. This increase in CD154 expression is associated with the presence of nephritis, increased CD154 transcription, and increased NFAT levels and transcriptional activity. Therefore, an argument can be made to explore a role for NFAT/calcineurin inhibitors, particularly novel agents with increased benefit to side-effect ratios, in the treatment of pediatric SLE nephritis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank the patients and their friends for volunteering for the study, and the clinical pediatric rheumatology fellows and Drs. Albert, Burnham, Finkel, Goldsmith, and Sherry for recruitment of subjects. We also thank Drs. Shyamala Arunachalam and Jennifer Kozak for scientific contributions to the study. We also appreciate the coordinating efforts of Ms. Chantal Dilzer and the assistance of the nursing/phlebotomy staff of the General Clinical Research Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

This work was supported, in part, by the Arthritis Foundation, Alabama Chapter Endowed Chair and by grants from the Arthritis Foundation, the Arthritis National Research Foundation, the Dorough Lupus Foundation, the Kahn Foundation for Lupus Research, the American College of Rheumatology Research and Education Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (R01-AR48257, R21-AR49335, P30-HH2815, M01-RR240).

Contributor Information

Jay Mehta, University of Pennsylvania.

Anna Genin, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Michael Brunner, University of Pennsylvania.

Lisabeth V Scalzi, Penn State University.

Nilamadhab Mishra, Wake Forest University.

Timothy Beukelman, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Randy Q Cron, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

REFERENCES

  • 1.van Kooten C, Banchereau J. CD40-CD40 ligand. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;67(1):2–17. doi: 10.1002/jlb.67.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roy M, Waldschmidt T, Aruffo A, Ledbetter JA, Noelle RJ. The regulation of the expression of gp39, the CD40 ligand, on normal and cloned CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 1993;151(5):2497–2510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brorson KA, Beverly B, Kang SM, Lenardo M, Schwartz RH. Transcriptional regulation of cytokine genes in nontransformed T cells. Apparent constitutive signals in run-on assays can be caused by repeat sequences. J Immunol. 1991;147(10):3601–3609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cron RQ. CD154 transcriptional regulation in primary human CD4 T cells. Immunol Res. 2003;27:185–202. doi: 10.1385/IR:27:2-3:185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Daikh DI, Finck BK, Linsley PS, Hollenbaugh D, Wofsy D. Long-term inhibition of murine lupus by brief simultaneous blockade of the B7/CD28 and CD40/gp39 costimulation pathways. J Immunol. 1997;159(7):3104–3108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Datta SK, Kalled SL. CD40-CD40 ligand interaction in autoimmune disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(10):1735–1745. doi: 10.1002/art.1780401002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kalled SL, Cutler AH, Datta SK, Thomas DW. Anti-CD40 ligand antibody treatment of SNF1 mice with established nephritis: preservation of kidney function. J Immunol. 1998;160(5):2158–2165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koshy M, Berger D, Crow MK. Increased expression of CD40 ligand on systemic lupus erythematosus lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 1996;98(3):826–837. doi: 10.1172/JCI118855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Desai-Mehta A, Lu L, Ramsey-Goldman R, Datta SK. Hyperexpression of CD40 ligand by B and T cells in human lupus and its role in pathogenic autoantibody production. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(9):2063–2073. doi: 10.1172/JCI118643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grammer AC, Slota R, Fischer R, Gur H, Girschick H, Yarboro C, et al. Abnormal germinal center reactions in systemic lupus erythematosus demonstrated by blockade of CD154-CD40 interactions. J Clin Invest. 2003;112(10):1506–1520. doi: 10.1172/JCI19301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boumpas DT, Furie R, Manzi S, Illei GG, Wallace DJ, Balow JE, et al. A short course of BG9588 (anti-CD40 ligand antibody) improves serologic activity and decreases hematuria in patients with proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(3):719–727. doi: 10.1002/art.10856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yi Y, McNerney M, Datta SK. Regulatory defects in cbl and mitogen-activated protein kinase (Extracellular signal-related kinase) pathways cause persistent hyperexpression of CD40 ligand in human lupus T cells. J Immunol. 2000;165(11):6627–6634. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.11.6627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cedeno S, Cifarelli DF, Blasini AM, Paris M, Placeres F, Alonso G, et al. Defective activity of ERK-1 and ERK-2 mitogen-activated protein kinases in peripheral blood T lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: potential role of altered coupling of Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor hSos to adapter protein Grb2 in lupus T cells. Clin Immunol. 2003;106(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6616(02)00052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schubert LA, King G, Cron RQ, Lewis DB, Aruffo A, Hollenbaugh D. The human gp39 promoter. Two distinct nuclear factors of activated T cell protein-binding elements contribute independently to transcriptional activation. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(50):29624–29627. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.50.29624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsytsykova AV, Tsitsikov EN, Geha RS. The CD40L promoter contains nuclear factor of activated T cells-binding motifs which require AP-1 binding for activation of transcription. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(7):3763–3770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsokos GC. Calcium signaling in systemic lupus erythematosus lymphocytes and its therapeutic exploitation. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(5):1216–1219. doi: 10.1002/art.23445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fujii Y, Fujii K, Iwata S, Suzuki K, Azuma T, Saito K, et al. Abnormal intracellular distribution of NFAT1 in T lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and characteristic clinical features. Clin Immunol. 2006;119(3):297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2006.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kyttaris VC, Wang Y, Juang YT, Weinstein A, Tsokos GC. Increased Levels of NF-ATc2 Differentially Regulate CD154 and IL-2 Genes in T Cells from Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Immunol. 2007;178(3):1960–1966. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cron RQ. HIV-1, NFAT, and cyclosporin: immunosuppresion for the immunosuppressed? DNA Cell Biol. 2001;20:761–767. doi: 10.1089/104454901753438570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jullien P, Cron RQ, Dabbagh K, Cleary A, Chen L, Tran P, et al. Decreased CD154 expression by neonatal CD4+ T cells is due to limitations in both proximal and distal events of T cell activation. Int Immunol. 2003;15(12):1461–1472. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxg145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jinquan T, Quan S, Jacobi HH, Reimert CM, Millner A, Hansen JB, et al. Cutting edge: expression of the NF of activated T cells in eosinophils: regulation by IL-4 and IL-5. J Immunol. 1999;163(1):21–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schubert LA, Cron RQ, Cleary AM, Brunner M, Song A, Lu L-S, et al. A T cell-specific enhancer of the human CD40 ligand gene. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:7386–7395. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110350200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Patrone G, Puppo F, Cusano R, Scaranari M, Ceccherini I, Puliti A, et al. Nuclear run-on assay using biotin labeling, magnetic bead capture and analysis by fluorescence-based RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2000;29(5):1012–1014. 1016–1017. doi: 10.2144/00295st02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brunner M, Zhang M, Genin A, Ho IC, Cron RQ. A T-cell-specific CD154 transcriptional enhancer located just upstream of the promoter. Genes Immun. 2008;9(7):640–649. doi: 10.1038/gene.2008.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cron RQ, Bort SJ, Wang Y, Brunvand MW, Lewis DB. T cell priming enhances IL-4 gene expression by increasing nuclear factor of activated T cells. J Immunol. 1999;162(2):860–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cron RQ, Bandyopadhyay R, Genin A, Brunner M, Kersh GJ, Yin J, et al. Early growth response-1 is required for CD154 transcription. J Immunol. 2006;176(2):811–818. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Amasaki Y, Masuda ES, Imamura R, Arai K, Arai N. Distinct NFAT family proteins are involved in the nuclear NFAT-DNA binding complexes from human thymocyte subsets. J Immunol. 1998;160(5):2324–2333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Serfling E, Chuvpilo S, Liu J, Hofer T, Palmetshofer A. NFATc1 autoregulation: a crucial step for cell-fate determination. Trends Immunol. 2006;27(10):461–469. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou B, Cron RQ, Wu B, Genin A, Wang Z, Liu S, et al. Regulation of the murine Nfatc1 gene by NFATc2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10704–10711. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107068200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mishra N, Brown DR, Olorenshaw IM, Kammer GM. Trichostatin A reverses skewed expression of CD154, interleukin-10, and interferon-gamma gene and protein expression in lupus T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(5):2628–2633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051507098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hamilton BJ, Genin A, Cron RQ, Rigby WF. Delineation of a novel pathway that regulates CD154 (CD40 ligand) expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(2):510–525. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.2.510-525.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rao A, Luo C, Hogan PG. Transcription factors of the NFAT family: regulation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15:707–747. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lyakh L, Ghosh P, Rice NR. Expression of NFAT-family proteins in normal human T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(5):2475–2484. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Torgerson TR, Genin A, Chen C, Zhang M, Zhou B, Anover-Sombke S, et al. FOXP3 inhibits activation-induced NFAT2 expression in T cells thereby limiting effector cytokine expression. J Immunol. 2009;183(2):907–915. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kyttaris VC, Juang YT, Tenbrock K, Weinstein A, Tsokos GC. Cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate response element modulator is responsible for the decreased expression of c-fos and activator protein-1 binding in T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2004;173(5):3557–3563. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.5.3557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wong HK, Kammer GM, Dennis G, Tsokos GC. Abnormal NF-kappa B activity in T lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with decreased p65-RelA protein expression. J Immunol. 1999;163(3):1682–1689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Katsiari CG, Tsokos GC. Transcriptional repression of interleukin-2 in human systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5(2):118–121. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yellin MJ, D'Agati V, Parkinson G, Han AS, Szema A, Baum D, et al. Immunohistologic analysis of renal CD40 and CD40L expression in lupus nephritis and other glomerulonephritides. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(1):124–134. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kuroiwa T, Lee EG, Danning CL, Illei GG, McInnes IB, Boumpas DT. CD40 ligand-activated human monocytes amplify glomerular inflammatory responses through soluble and cell-to-cell contact-dependent mechanisms. J Immunol. 1999;163(4):2168–2175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohan C, Shi Y, Laman JD, Datta SK. Interaction between CD40 and its ligand gp39 in the development of murine lupus nephritis. J Immunol. 1995;154(3):1470–1480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Patschan S, Dolff S, Kribben A, Durig J, Patschan D, Wilde B, et al. CD134 expression on CD4+ T cells is associated with nephritis and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006;145(2):235–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03141.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Toubi E, Shoenfeld Y. The role of CD40-CD154 interactions in autoimmunity and the benefit of disrupting this pathway. Autoimmunity. 2004;37(6–7):457–464. doi: 10.1080/08916930400002386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cron RQ. CD154 and lupus. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2003;1(2):172–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Feutren G, Querin S, Noel LH, Chatenoud L, Beaurain G, Tron F, et al. Effects of cyclosporine in severe systemic lupus erythematosus. J Pediatr. 1987;111(6 Pt 2):1063–1068. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Baca V, Catalan T, Villasis-Keever M, Ramon G, Morales AM, Rodriguez-Leyva F. Effect of low-dose cyclosporine A in the treatment of refractory proteinuria in childhood-onset lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2006;15(8):490–495. doi: 10.1191/0961203306lu2312oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fu LW, Yang LY, Chen WP, Lin CY. Clinical efficacy of cyclosporin a neoral in the treatment of paediatric lupus nephritis with heavy proteinuria. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(2):217–221. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.2.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tzung TY, Liu YS, Chang HW, Tacrolimus vs. clobetasol propionate in the treatment of facial cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind, bilateral comparison study. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(1):191–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tanaka H, Oki E, Tsugawa K, Nonaka K, Suzuki K, Ito E. Effective treatment of young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing lupus nephritis with tacrolimus given as a single daily dose: an open-label pilot study. Lupus. 2007;16(11):896–900. doi: 10.1177/0961203307081914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roehrl MH, Kang S, Aramburu J, Wagner G, Rao A, Hogan PG. Selective inhibition of calcineurin-NFAT signaling by blocking protein-protein interaction with small organic molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(20):7554–7559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401835101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES