Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1972 May;51(5):1063–1075. doi: 10.1172/JCI106898

Physical properties of isolated perfused renal tubules and tubular basement membranes

Larry W Welling 1,2, Jared J Grantham 1,2
PMCID: PMC292235  PMID: 5057126

Abstract

To study the physical properties of renal tubular basement membranes directly, the epithelial layer of single isolated perfused rabbit proximal convoluted, proximal straight, and cortical collecting tubules was removed with sodium desoxycholate. Tubular segments were perfused using micropipets. The distal end of each segment was occluded in order to simplify the measurement of transmembrane water flow. The relation between outer tubular diameter and applied transmural pressure was identical in intact tubules and their respective isolated tubular basement membranes indicating that the basement membrane determines tubular distensibility. Young's modulus for basement membranes from all tubular segments corresponded to that of tendon collagen. Membrane hydraulic conductivity was measured in two ways: (a) from the rate of transmural flow in response to an applied difference in hydrostatic pressure and, (b) from the rate of transmural flow in response to a difference in colloid osmotic pressure. The hydraulic conductivity of tubular basement membranes was 300-800 times greater than that of the intact epithelial layer. Basement membrane hydraulic conductance was similar to that of peritubular and glomerular capillaries in vivo. The hydrostatic conductance of tubular basement membranes exceeded the osmotic conductance by 3-10-fold owing largely to the fact that the membranes were moderately permeable to the osmotic solute (albumin). In view of these findings we suggest that oncotic and hydrostatic pressure may play an important role in the movement of tubular absorbate from the epithelial compartment into the renal interstitium.

Full text

PDF
1063

Images in this article

1065Image
on p.1065
1065Image
on p.1065
1065Image
on p.1065
1065Image
on p.1065

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergel D. H. The static elastic properties of the arterial wall. J Physiol. 1961 May;156(3):445–457. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner B. M., Falchuk K. H., Keimowitz R. I., Berliner R. W. The relationship between peritubular capillary protein concentration and fluid reabsorption by the renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest. 1969 Aug;48(8):1519–1531. doi: 10.1172/JCI106118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner B. M., Troy J. L., Daugharty T. M. The dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1971 Aug;50(8):1776–1780. doi: 10.1172/JCI106667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burg M. B., Orloff J. Control of fluid absorption in the renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest. 1968 Sep;47(9):2016–2024. doi: 10.1172/JCI105888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Falchuk K. H., Berliner R. W. Hydrostatic pressures in peritubular capillaries and tubules in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1971 May;220(5):1422–1426. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.220.5.1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fung Y. C., Zweifach B. W., Intaglietta M. Elastic environment of the capillary bed. Circ Res. 1966 Aug;19(2):441–461. doi: 10.1161/01.res.19.2.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GOTTSCHALK C. W., MYLLE M. Micropuncture study of pressures in proximal tubules and peritubular capillaries of the rat kidney and their relation to ureteral and renal venous pressures. Am J Physiol. 1956 May;185(2):430–439. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.185.2.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganote C. E., Grantham J. J., Moses H. L., Burg M. B., Orloff J. Ultrastructural studies of vasopressin effect on isolated perfused renal collecting tubules of the rabbit. J Cell Biol. 1968 Feb;36(2):355–367. doi: 10.1083/jcb.36.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grantham J. J., Ganote C. E., Burg M. B., Orloff J. Paths of transtubular water flow in isolated renal collecting tubules. J Cell Biol. 1969 May;41(2):562–576. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.2.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grantham J. J. Mode of water transport in mammalian renal collecting tubules. Fed Proc. 1971 Jan-Feb;30(1):14–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grantham J. J. Vasopressin: effect on deformability of urinary surface of collecting duct cells. Science. 1970 May 29;168(3935):1093–1095. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3935.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Imai M., Kokko J. P. Effect of peritubular protein concentration on reabsorption of sodium and water in isolated perfused proxmal tubules. J Clin Invest. 1972 Feb;51(2):314–325. doi: 10.1172/JCI106816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Intaglietta M., Zweifach B. W. Measurement of blood plasma colloid osmotic pressure. I. Technical aspects. Microvasc Res. 1971 Jan;3(1):72–82. doi: 10.1016/0026-2862(71)90008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaye G. I., Wheeler H. O., Whitlock R. T., Lane N. Fluid transport in the rabbit gallbladder. A combined physiological and electron microscopic study. J Cell Biol. 1966 Aug;30(2):237–268. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kefalides N. A. The chemistry and structure of basement membranes. Arthritis Rheum. 1969 Aug;12(4):427–443. doi: 10.1002/art.1780120411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kokko J. P., Burg M. B., Orloff J. Characteristics of NaCl and water transport in the renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest. 1971 Jan;50(1):69–76. doi: 10.1172/JCI106485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lewy J. E., Windhager E. E. Peritubular control of proximal tubular fluid reabsorption in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1968 May;214(5):943–954. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.214.5.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Martino J. A., Earley L. E. Demonstraton of a role of physical factors as determinants of the natriuretic response to volume expansion. J Clin Invest. 1967 Dec;46(12):1963–1978. doi: 10.1172/JCI105686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marty A. T., Intaglietta M. Effect of anticoagulants on human plasma colloid osmotic pressure measurements. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Nov;29(5):740–741. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.29.5.740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RHODIN J. A. The diaphragm of capillary endothelial fenestrations. J Ultrastruct Res. 1962 Apr;6:171–185. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(62)90052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tormey J. M., Diamond J. M. The ultrastructural route of fluid transport in rabbit gall bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):2031–2060. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES