Abstract
Multidimensional ion mobility spectrometry coupled with mass spectrometry (IMS–IMS-MS) techniques are used to select and activate six different gas-phase conformations of bradykinin [M+3H]3+ ions. Drift time distributions as a function of activation voltage show that at low voltages selected structures undergo conformational transitions in what appears to be a pathway dependent fashion. Over a relatively wide range of intermediate activation voltages a distribution of states that is independent of the initial conformation selected for activation (as well as the activation voltage in this intermediate region) is established. This distribution appears to represent an equilibrium distribution of gas-phase structures that is reached prior to the energy required for dissociation. Establishment of a quasi-equilibrium prior to dissociation results in identical dissociation patterns for different selected conformations. A discussion of the transition from solution-like to gas-phase structures is provided.
Keywords: ion mobility, multidimensional, conformational transitions, bradykinin
Introduction
Since the development of electrospray ionization (ESI)1 as a soft ionization source for mass spectrometry (MS), many studies have focused on understanding the structures of the solvent-free macromolecular ions that are produced. 2-17 A primary aim of this work is to understand the degree to which the population of gas-phase ions resembles the structures that existed in solution prior to ionization. To the extent that ion conformations retain solution-like properties, MS-techniques will be useful in assessing structural information that is relevant to solution. Alternatively, an understanding of structures that arise in the gas-phase, in the absence of solvent will help to delineate the roles of intramolecular and solvent-molecule interactions in defining key structural elements.18
In this paper, we use ion mobility techniques to examine the [M+3H]3+ ion of bradykinin (a nonapeptide, with the sequence RPPGFSPFR) produced by ESI. At least six distinct conformations originate from the ESI source. We have selected each of the [M+3H]3+ states and measured the activation voltage that is required to induce structural transitions. These studies provide evidence that any of these states is capable of generating an equilibrium distribution of gas-phase structures under the proper activation conditions. Interestingly, the equilibrium distribution that is formed in the gas phase is dominated by only three of the selected states. It appears that even in relatively small molecular systems, a large number of conformations generated by ESI do not reflect the most stable gas-phase structures, which are formed after ions are activated to a voltage that is near a value that also induces dissociation.
A number of experimental methods have been used to characterize the conformations of biomolecular ions. These include: 1)reactive methods, such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange,3,4,7,9,19,20 measurements of proton-transfer, 14,21,22 molecular adduction experiments, 23-25 and ion-electron as well as ion-ion reactions; 26-28 2) methods that probe ion shape, such as ion energy loss experiments,6,29 microscopy studies of hillocks formed from high energy ion impacts with surfaces,30-32 and IMS measurements of collision cross section;10, 33-37 and, 3)dissociative MS techniques.38-42 Of these techniques, the most direct information about ion shapes is obtained by IMS techniques. 16,43-48 In favorable cases, comparisons of experimental mobilities to those calculated for trial geometries49-51 generated by theory provides relatively detailed insight into the structures of ions.52-55 Mobility measurements have also been used to monitor the structures of electrosprayed ions that were stored in ion traps for varying amounts of time,56-58 and measurements as a function of drift cell temperature have provided information about the relative stabilities of different conformations.33,59,60
During the last decade, mounting evidence suggests that under some conditions, populations of ions formed by ESI reflect structures that are present in solution. For example, Loo and coworkers found that the higher-order structure of a gas-phase biomolecular ion could be linked to the solution structure using tandem MS experiments.61 Ion mobility results have shown that the distribution of cytochrome c and ubiquitin structures that are observed in the gas phase are dependent upon the solution and source conditions used to produce these ions.62,63 Recently Robinson's and Bowers’ groups have examined large non-covalent complexes and suggest that for these large ions, structures in the gas phase may reflect solution conformations as well as structures associated with intermediates that are present in solution.64-66 The present work is the first characterization of an equilibrium distribution of gas phase states prior to dissociation. We have chosen to demonstrate this approach on the bradykinin system because it has been studied extensively.33,67-79 Finally, while this work is at an early stage, it is anticipated that over time, these types of studies will help to clarify whether ion distributions reflect solution- or gas-phase structures.
Experimental Methods
General
IMS theory43-45,49-51 instrumentation,58,80-87 and techniques16,46-48 are discussed in detail elsewhere. In this study, experiments were performed on a home-built ion mobility spectrometer coupled to a time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer (Figure 1), described previously.58,86,87 Briefly, positively charged bradykinin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) ions were produced by ESI of a 9.4 μM solution in 49:49:2 (% volume) water:methanol:acetic acid. Ions are focused and accumulated in a Smith-geometry ion funnel (F1),88 and pulsed into the drift tube with a 150 μs-wide electrostatic gate (G1). The drift tube (D1 and D2) contains ~3 Torr He buffer gas at 300 K and is operated under a uniform electric field (9.6 V· cm-1), allowing ions to separate on the basis of their mobilities. A funnel (F2) in the middle of the drift tube serves to radially focus the diffuse ion packet, and also consists of an electrostatic gate (G2) and activation region (IA2). Following separation through D2, ions are again radially focused through funnel F3. Ions exit the drift tube through a differentially pumped region and are orthogonally accelerated into a field-free flight tube for TOF mass analysis.
Two different instrumental modes were used in this experiment: one-dimensional (IMS-MS), and two-dimensional (IMS–IMS-MS). For IMS-MS experiments, the field in G2 is maintained at the drift field such that all mobility separated ions through the first drift region (D1) are allowed to pass into the second drift region (D2). Under the IMS-MS mode of operation, D1 and D2 comprise a single, ~1.8-meter drift tube.
Selection and activation
An important part of the work described below involves the selection, activation and subsequent separation of ions (i.e., IMS-IMS) experiments. We have described the instrumentation for these types of studies in detail previously.58,86,87 Briefly, when a high field is applied across the ion activation region, entering ions undergo energizing collisions with the buffer gas and are heated. As the ions leave the activation region they rapidly equilibrate to the temperature of the buffer gas.
In these experiments, D1 and D2 are operated as two independent drift regions of 0.84 m and 0.98 m, respectively. A mobility selection is obtained after ions pass through D1 by applying a delay pulse at G2 (triggered by the initial pulse at G1). A narrow packet of ions is allowed to pass through G2 by lowering a repulsive potential (16 V) for 25 μs. Ions entering the gate region before or after the transmission pulse is applied are neutralized by a Ni mesh grid (90% transmittance) on the first electrostatic lens of G2. Those mobility-selected ions that continue through F2 can be collisionally activated in the IA2 region prior to subsequent separation through the D2 region.
The activation region IA2 is comprised of two lenses ~0.3 cm apart. For selection with no activation, the field between the two lenses comprising IA2 is held consistent with the ~12 V· cm-1 DC field through F2. These field conditions are defined as having an activation of 0 V, such that ion activation is the application of voltage at IA2 resulting in a field greater than 12 V· cm-1. Thus, an activation voltage of 70 V corresponds to a field strength of ~233 V· cm-1.
Calculating cross section distributions
In the case of a uniform electric field, drift time distributions can be converted to a collision cross section scale using Equation 1:45
(1) |
where ze, kb, mI, and mB are the ion's charge, Boltzmann's constant, the mass of the ion, and the mass of the buffer gas, respectively; tD, E, and L correspond to the ion's drift time, the electric field strength, and the drift length, respectively; P, T, and N are the pressure, temperature, and neutral number density (at STP) of the buffer gas, respectively. The current instrument contains two funnels (F2 and F3) in the drift region, which are operated at a higher drift field field (12 V· cm-1) than the drift regions and also contain RF confinement fields. Because a uniform drift field is not applied across the entire drift tube, cross sections are determined by measuring the time required for ions to travel through the uniform field region (from G1 to G2). That is, one determines the selection time required to transmit a single conformer. The selection time, and the length from G1 to G2 (71.3 cm) are substituted in Equation 1 as td and L, respectively. Once absolute values of the cross sections for ions within a specific peak are determined (with no activation), these values are then used to generate a calibrated cross section distribution, where all drift times are converted to a calculated cross section. The reproducibility of this approach is excellent. Typically, cross sections for any two measurements agree within ~1% (relative uncertainty).47
Results and Discussion
Determining collision cross sections for bradykinin [M+3H]3+ ions formed by direct ESI
A nested drift time(m/z) distribution recorded upon electrospraying bradykinin is shown in Figure 2. Under the conditions that are employed, this spectrum is dominated by the [M+2H]2+ and [M+3H]3+ charge states. The drift time distribution for the [M+3H]3+ ions, overlaid above the corresponding 2D features, shows at least six distinct reproducible local maxima. We have assigned these features as conformations A through F. Some of the labeled peaks possess shoulders, thus it is possible that the [M+3H]3+ drift distribution is made up of many unresolved conformations. For this study, however, we focus on the six selections made, and their resulting distributions upon activation.
It is important to note that we observe no other ions in the region of drift times that are associated with the [M+3H]3+ charge state. Thus, upon selection and activation we expect only this charge state to contribute to the new distributions. Figure 2 also shows a blow up of the mass scale. The 0.33 m/z spacing between the isotopic peaks observed for each of the features requires that all of the ions correspond to the [M+3H]3+ charge state. There is no evidence for multiply charged multimers of the same m/z in this system.75,89
Inspection of Figure 2 shows that conformations A, B, and C are more intense, than the features corresponding to the lower-mobility D, E, and F ions. Conformer A is represented by a peak centered around 11.5 ms, and is not baseline resolved from conformer B. Conformer B corresponds to the peak centered around 12.2 ms; and, conformer C corresponds to the peak at 13.0 ms. The low-mobility region of the drift time distribution (~13.5 to 15.5 ms) consists of lower intensity ions, which remain unresolved in the mobility separation. Three selection experiments were performed for the most distinct features in this region, corresponding to isolation of narrow regions designated as conformers D, E, and F having drift times of 13.74, 14.40, and 15.18 ms, respectively.
The drift time distributions can be converted to collision cross section distributions. Here each time point corresponding to the time required for ions to traverse the drift region between G1 and G2, can be used in Equation 1 to calculate a corresponding collision cross section for the [M+3H]3+ ions. The cross section distribution obtained for ions generated in the ESI source region is shown in Figure 3. Table 1 lists the collision cross section determined directly from the G1 to G2 measurement as well as the relative abundance (based on peak area) of each dataset feature in the total distribution.
Table 1.
Conformationa | ccs (Å2)b | % abundance (source)c | % abundance (QE)d |
---|---|---|---|
A | 269 (275e) | 22.1% | 1.8 ± 0.3% |
B | 285 (284f, 293e) | 31.4% | 16 ± 3% |
C | 305 | 30.8% | 80 ± 2% |
D | 322 | 4.3% | < 1% |
E | 338 | 4.7% | < 1% |
F | 356 | 1.9% | < 1% |
Conformations from highest to lowest mobilities are shown in Figure 2.
Collision cross sections are reported using drift times from peak maxima in the overall arrival time distribution of [M+3H]3+ bradykinin ions.
Percent relative abundance (peak area) of each conformation relative to the total [M+3H]3+ source distribution.
Percent relative abundance (peak area) of each conformation relative to the total [M+3H]3+ distribution in the QE range.
Published experimental collision cross section from reference 75.
Published experimental collision cross section from reference 72.
It is interesting that cross sections span a relatively wide range of values, from 269 Å2 to 356 Å2 for conformers A and F, respectively. Values for conformers B (285 Å2) and C (304 Å2) are in agreement with the values 284 Å2 and 293 Å2 obtained previously for the [M+3H]3+ charge state.72,75 The collision cross section obtained for conformer A is slightly smaller than the value of 275 Å2 reported earlier.75
Observed conformational changes upon activation
Cross section distributions have been recorded upon selection and activation of each of the six conformations (A through F) over an activation voltage range of 0 to 140 V. Several example distributions for each selected conformer are plotted in Figure 3. At 0 V, selection of conformer A yields a single, narrow peak, indicating that no activation has occurred. Similar distributions are obtained until ~10 V. Upon application of 24 V across the activation region a clear difference in the distribution is observed; although conformer A remains the largest feature (~96% relative abundance) through the second drift separation, conformer B (at 285 Å2) is clearly present (comprising ~4% of the distribution). There is no evidence for production of other states under these conditions. However, upon increasing the activation voltage to 28 V, it is clear that conformer C (at 305 Å2) is produced.
As can be observed in Figure 3, at higher activation voltages (34 V, 36 V, 38 V, 42 V, and 45 V) the fraction of conformer A continues to decrease. By 38 V, conformers A, B, and C are in roughly equal proportion (33%, 37%, and 30%, respectively). Above 38 V, conformer C becomes the dominant feature in the profile. Proportions of conformers A, B, and C at 70 V activation are 2%, 17%, and 79%, respectively. It is important to note that there are no conditions in which conformer A disappears completely.
Selection of conformer B (having a cross section of 285 Å2) is also plotted above the ESI source distribution in Figure 3. At low activation voltages, the distribution remains dominated by B. At 25 V activation, peaks on each side of B, corresponding to cross sections of 269 and 305 Å2 are observed, indicating the onsets of states A and B. At higher activation voltages (32 V, 38 V, and 40 V) the population of state B decreases. In this case the population of conformer A increases to a maximum of ~2% by 35 V activation (not shown). Conformer C is clearly the dominant feature (56%) in the spectrum obtained at 45 V activation. Conformer B decreases from 30% at 50 V activation to 17% (at 70 V activation). It is important to note that the populations of all three states remain essentially unchanged above ~50 V. Conformers A, B, and C have relative populations of ~2%, ~17% and ~79%, respectively. The distributions obtained at high activation voltages are indistinguishable from the high-voltage distributions obtained from activation of conformer A.
Activation of conformer C shows that this state can also convert to A and B. However, unlike activation of the higher mobility states, under all conditions conformation C dominates the distribution. At the highest activation voltage that is shown (70 V) relative populations of 3%, 17%, and 78% for conformers A, B, and C, respectively are obtained. Effectively, high voltage activation results in the same distribution, regardless of which state was selected.
It is interesting to also consider selection and activation of the lower mobility D, E, and F conformers. Overall, these ions show the same general trend as discussed for A, B, and C above. Selected conformers are converted to increasing fractions of conformers A, B, and C as a function of increasing activation voltage; all experiments converged to the same fraction of A (~2%), B (~17%), and C (~79%) at 70 V. Selected conformers E and F are more stable than conformer D, evidenced by the presence of conformers C and E without activation of conformer D. Additionally, increased activation voltage is needed in order to induce structural transitions back to A, B, and C (Figure 3) as the selected ions became more elongated (D < E < F).
Evidence for formation of a quasi-equilibrium distribution of gas-phase conformations
Figure 3 illustrates the quasi-equilibrium that is established independent of the [M+3H]3+ conformation selected. That is, identical distributions are obtained at elevated activation voltages regardless of the initial conformation. This phenomenon has been further investigated in the datasets collected at several different pressures. While the exact activation voltage varies somewhat, the ratios of the final populations of the A, B, and C states remains unchanged.
Figure 4 shows the normalized fraction of different conformations as a function of activation voltage. Selection and activation of conformer A is first illustrated (top left). As the activation voltage is increased, conformer B begins to form, followed by the transition to conformer C. Initially conformer B increases to 32% at 25 V activation, however, the fraction of B decreases before leveling off to its quasi-equilibrium population.
Based on these observations, we propose the following for activation of conformer A: as ions are gently heated a fraction of ions converts to conformer B; at higher energies ions have enough energy to overcome the barrier associated with formation of conformer C. In every case, at higher activation voltages a plateau region is reached. In this region we observe that the fractions of A, B, and C are constant (and independent of activation voltage). In the case of the data shown in Figure 4 this region is observed from ~40 to 70 V.
Above ~70 V, we observe the onset of fragment formation (Figure 4, top left). Fragment formation appears to compete directly with all three of the A, B and C states. While we do not show the fragmentation spectra that are generated at high activation voltages it is important to note that inspection of these datasets shows that the ratios of abundant fragment ions appear to be identical (regardless of which state is selected for activation).
All of this information is consistent with the idea that states A, B, and C exist in equilibrium at high activation voltages. This can be highlighted by plotting the fractions of the A, B, and C states together (Figure 4, top right, bottom left, and bottom right, respectively). Here, the fraction of each conformer can be compared from the experiment in which it was selected, to the experiments in which it was formed from the selection of a different conformer. In the equilibrium region, the fractions of A, B, or C are each constant (1.8 ± 0.3%, 16 ± 3%, 80 ± 2%, respectively) regardless of which state was selected for activation.
Activation at different buffer gas pressures
Detailed studies as a function of the activation voltage have been conducted at several different buffer gas pressure settings (ranging from ~1.9 to 4.0 Torr). While we do not discuss this in detail here, we note that the voltage dependence of the features observed after activation varies somewhat depending upon the pressure. As the buffer gas pressure is increased, voltages required to induce structural transitions increase, resulting in a compression of the quasi-equilibrium voltage range. Presumably this is a result of differences that arise in the heating and cooling rates of the ions at different pressures, and is the subject of a future report.90 The overall trends in the features observed are reproduced at different pressures. That is, although the quasi-equilibrium voltage range is compressed, the same fractions of conformers A, B, and C are observed.
Possible origins of transitions
Overall, the data presented above suggests two types of behavior. At low activation voltages it appears that ions overcome barriers between structures and can be converted into other low energy structures. In the cases of A, B, and C it is possible to convert at least some fraction of the population to other states without establishing an equilibrium distribution. This indicates that structures change through specific pathways. Alternatively, when sufficient energy is put into the system the distribution of states becomes independent of the precursor state (or the detailed energy). This indicates that structures A, B, and C are able to interconvert and establish a quasi-equilibrium distribution of states.
It is interesting to consider the origin of those states that are involved in the equilibrium distribution. It is likely that the distribution consists of three types of conformations, varying in shape, charge site assignment, and possibly the structures of the three proline residues. We note that the [M+2H]2+ ion exhibits only two features (Figure 2). It is possible that the lower number of resolvable conformations results from a single possible charge-site configuration in which the protons are sequestered at the arginine residues. Recent FAIMS studies have shown evidence for six [M+2H]2+ conformations.91
We are currently carrying out detailed molecular modeling studies of these types of structures and our preliminary findings suggest that charge site assignment and cis/trans isomerization of the three proline residues are key factors in the conformational transitions we observe experimentally. Future work will focus on relating the calculated cross sections and stabilities of different trial geometries and charge site configurations to the experimental data.
Conclusions
Ion mobility measurements of the bradykinin [M+3H]3+ charge state formed by direct ESI shows evidence for at least six distinct structures. Activation of specific structures shows that at low energies different conformations undergo structural transitions to specific states in a pathway dependent manner. Above a critical activation voltage, all six selected ions yield the same abundances of three conformations (A, B, and C). This suggests that this ratio of states is the gas-phase quasi equilibrium. Some structures (D, E, and F) do not appear to participate in the equilibrium distribution. Presumably these ions have conformations that are established in the presence of solution, and cannot be accessed from the gas-phase in the absence of solvent. The direct observation of an equilibrium distribution of structures, prior to the threshold for dissociation is consistent with the observation of fragmentation spectra that appear essentially indistinguishable for different selected states.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (1RC1GM090797-01), as well as funding through the DoD NSWC Crane “Next Generation Threat Detection” (N00164-08-C-JQ11).
References
- 1.Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, Wong SF, Whitehouse CM. Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules. Science. 1988;246:64–71. doi: 10.1126/science.2675315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chowdhury SK, Chait BT. Analysis of Mixtures of Closely-Related Forms of Bovine Trypsin by Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry – Use of Charge State Distributions to Resolve Ions of the Different Forms. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 1990;173(3):927–931. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)80874-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Katta V, Chait BT. Conformational Changes in Proteins Probed by Hydrogen-Exchange Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Sp. 1991;5(4):214–217. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290050415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Winger BE, Lightwahl KJ, Rockwood AL, Smith RD. Probing Qualitative Conformation Differences of Multiply Protonated Gas-Phase Proteins via H/D Isotopic Exchange with D20. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114(14):5897–5898. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheng XH, Fenselau C. Target-Capture and Ion-Molecule Reactions in High-Energy Collisions Between Protonated Polypeptide Ions and Hydrogen-Containing Target Gases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:10327–10333. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Covey TR, Douglas DJ. Collision Cross Sections for Protein Ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1993;4:616–623. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(93)85025-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suckau D, Shi Y, Beu SC, Senko MW, Quinn JP, Wampler FM, III, McLafferty FW. Coexisting stable conformations of gaseous protein ions. Proc. Natl. Adad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:790–793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cox KA, Julian RK, Jr., Cooks RG, Kaiser RE., Jr. Conformer Selection of Protein Ions by Ion Mobility in a Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994;5:127–136. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94)85025-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Campbell S, Rodgers MT, Marzluff EM, Beauchamp JL. Deuterium exchange reactions as a probe of biomolecule structure. Fundamental studies of cas phase H/D exchange reactions of protonated glycine oligomers with D2O, CD3OD, CD3CO2D, and ND3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117(51):12840–12854. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clemmer DE, Hudgins RR, Jarrold MF. Naked Protein Conformations: Cytochrome c in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:10141–10142. [Google Scholar]
- 11.von Helden G, Wyttenbach T, Bowers MT. Conformation of Macromolecules in the Gas Phase: Use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Methods in Ion Chromatography. Science. 1995;267:1483–1485. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5203.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bowers MT, Marshall AG, McLafferty FW. Mass Spectrometry: Recent Advances and Future Directions. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:12897–12910. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smith RD, Bruce JE, Wu Q, Lei QP. New mass spectrometric methods for the study of noncovalent associations of biopolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997;26:191–202. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Williams ER. Proton Transfer Reactivity of Large Multiply Charged Ions. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996;31:831–842. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199608)31:8<831::AID-JMS392>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Loo JA. Studying noncovalent protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997;16:1–23. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1997)16:1<1::AID-MAS1>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoaglund Hyzer CS, Counterman AE, Clemmer DE. Anhydrous Protein Ions. Chem. Rev. 1999;99:3037–3079. doi: 10.1021/cr980139g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wyttenbach T, Bowers MT. Intermolecular interactions in biomolecular systems examined by mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007;58:511–533. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wolynes PG. Biomolecular Folding in Vacuo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA. 1995;92:2426–2427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wood TD, Chorush RA, Wampler FM, Little DP, O'Connor PB, McLafferty FW. Gas-Phase Folding and Unfolding of Cytochrome c Cations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:2451–2454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Valentine SJ, Clemmer DE. H/D Exchange Levels of Shape-Resolved Cytochrome c Conformers in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:3558–3566. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schnier PD, Gross DS, Williams ER. Electrostatic Forces and Dielectric Polarizability of Multiply Protonated Gas-Phase Cytochrome c Ions Probed by Ion/Molecule Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:6747–6757. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Green MK, Lebrilla CB. Ion-Molecule Reactions as Probes of Gas-Phase Structures of Peptides and Proteins. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997;16:53–71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1997)16:2<53::AID-MAS1>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rodriguez-Cruz SE, Klassen JS, Williams ER. Hydration of gas-phase gramicidin S (M+2H)(2+) ions formed by electrospray: The transition from solution to gas-phase structure. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997;8:565–568. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fye JL, Woenckhaus J, Jarrold MF. Hydration of folded and unfolded gas-phase proteins: Saturation of cytochrome c and apomyoglobin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:1327–1328. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stephenson JL, Schaaff TG, McLuckey SA. Hydroiodic acid attachment kinetics as a chemical probe of gaseous protein ion structure: Bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999;10(6):552–556. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zubarev RA, Kelleher NL, McLafferty FW. Electron capture dissociation of multiply charged protein cations. A nonergodic process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:3265–3266. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stephenson JL, McLuckey SA. Ion/ion reactions in the gas phase: Proton transfer reactions involving multiply-charged proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118(31):7390–7397. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Syka JEP, Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:9528–9533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402700101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Douglas DJ. Applications of Collision Dynamics in Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998;9:101–113. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reimann CT, Quist AP, Kopniczky J, Sundqvist BUR, Erlandsson R, Tengvall P. Impacts of Polyatomic Ions on Surfaces – Conformation and Degree of Fragmentation Determined by Lateral Dimensiosn of Impact Features. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.,Sect. B. 1994;88:29–34. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sullivan PA, Axelsson J, Altmann S, Quist AP, Sundqvist BUR, Reimann CT. Defect formation on surfaces bombarded by energetic multiply charged proteins: Implications for the conformation of gas-phase electrosprayed ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1996;7:329–341. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(95)00702-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reimann CT, Sullivan PA, Axelsson J, Quist AP, Altmann S, Roepstorff P, Velazquez I, Tapia O. Conformation of highly-charged gas-phase lysozyme revealed by energetic surface imprinting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:7608–7616. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wyttenbach T, vonHelden G, Bowers MT. Gas-phase conformation of biological molecules: Bradykinin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:8355–8364. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shelimov KB, Clemmer DE, Hudgins RR, Jarrold MF. Protein structure in vacuo: Gas-phase confirmations of BPTI and cytochrome c. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:2240–2248. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shelimov KB, Jarrold MF. Conformations, unfolding, and refolding of apomyoglobin in vacuum: An activation barrier for gas-phase protein folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:2987–2994. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Valentine SJ, Anderson JG, Ellington AD, Clemmer DE. Disulfide-Intact and -Reduced Lysozyme in the Gas Phase: Conformations and Pathways of Folding and Unfolding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:3891–3900. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Valentine SJ, Counterman AE, Clemmer DE. Conformer-Dependent Proton-Transfer Reactions of Ubiquitin Ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997;8:954–961. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Johnson RS, Martin SA, Biemann K. Collision-induced fragmentation of (M + H)+ ions of peptides. Side chain specific sequence ions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes. 1988;86:137–154. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dongre AR, Jones JL, Somogyi A, Wysocki VH. Influence of peptide composition, gas-phase basicity, and chemical modification on fragmentation efficiency: Evidence for the mobile proton model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:8365–8374. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vachet RW, Asam MR, Glish GL. Secondary interactions affecting the dissociation patterns of arginine-containing peptide ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:6252–6256. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Loo JA, Edmonds CG, Smith RD. Primary Sequence Information from Intact Proteins by Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass-Spectrometry. Science. 1990;248:201–204. doi: 10.1126/science.2326633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu Q, Van Orden S, Cheng X, Bakhtiar R, Smith RD. Characterization of Cytochrome c Variants with High-Resolution FTICR Mass-Spectrometry – Correlation of Fragmentation and Structure. Anal. Chem. 1995;67:2498. doi: 10.1021/ac00110a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mack E. Average Cross-Sectional Areas of Molecules by Gaseous Diffusion Methods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1925;47:2468–2482. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Revercomb HE, Mason EA. Theory of Plasma Chromatography Gaseous Electrophoresis - Review. Anal. Chem. 1975;47:970–983. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mason EA, McDaniel EW. Transport Properties of Ions in Gases. Wiley; New York: 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 46.St. Louis RH, Hill HH. Ion Mobility Spectrometry in Analytical Chemistry. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1990;21:321–355. doi: 10.1021/ac00222a001. For a review of IMS techniques see (and references therein) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Clemmer DE, Jarrold MF. Ion Mobility Measurements and their Applications to Clusters and Biomolecules. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997;32:577–592. For a review of IMS techniques see (and references therein) [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bohrer BC, Merenbloom SI, Koeniger SL, Hilderbrand AE, Clemmer DE. Biomolecule Analysis by Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008;1(10):1–10. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.113001. For a review of IMS techniques see (and references therein) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shvartsburg AA, Jarrold MF. An exact hard-spheres scattering model for the mobilities of polyatomic ions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996;261:86–91. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mesleh MF, Hunter JM, Shvartsburg AA, Schatz GC, Jarrold MF. Structural information from ion mobility measurements: effects of the long-range potential. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:16082–86. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wyttenbach T, von Helden G, Batka JJ, Carlat D, Bowers MT. Effect of the long-range potential on ion mobility measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;8:275–82. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hudgins RR, Ratner MA, Jarrold MF. Design of Helices That Are Stable in Vacuo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:12974–12975. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wyttenbach T, Bushnell JE, Bowers MT. Salt Bridge Structures in the Absence of Solvent? The Case for the Oligoglycines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:5098–5103. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Counterman AE, Clemmer DE. Compact -> Extended Helix Transitions of Polyalanine in Vacuo. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003;107:2111–2117. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ruotolo BT, Verbeck GF, Thomson LM, Gillig KJ, Russell DH. Observation of conserved solution-phase secondary structure in gas-phase tryptic peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124(16):4214–4215. doi: 10.1021/ja0178113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Myung S, Badman E, Lee YJ, Clemmer DE. Structural Transitions of Electrosprayed Ubiquitin Ions Stored in an Ion Trap over ~10 ms to 30s. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:9976–9982. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Badman E, Myung S, Clemmer DE. Evidence for Unfolding and Refolding of Gas Phase Cyctrochrome c Ions in a Paul Trap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005;16:1493–1497. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Koeniger SL, Merenbloom SI, Clemmer DE. Evidence for Many Resolvable Structures within Conformation Types of Electrosprayed Ubiquitin Ions. J. Phys. Chem B. 2006;110:7017–7021. doi: 10.1021/jp056165h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jarrold MF. Unfolding, Refolding, and Hydration of Proteins in the Gas Phase. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999;32:360–367. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Valentine SJ, Clemmer DE. Temperature Dependent H/D Exchange of Compact and Elongated Cytochrome c Ions in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002;13:506–517. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(02)00372-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Loo JA, He JX, Cody WL. Higher Order Structure in the Gas Phase Reflects Solution Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:4542–4543. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hudgins RR, Woenckhaus J, Jarrold MF. High Resolution Ion Mobility Measurements for Gas-Phase Proteins: Correlation Between Solution Phase and Gas Phase Conformations. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes. 1997;165/166:497–507. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li J, Taraszka JA, Counterman AE, Clemmer DE. Influence of solvent composition and capillary temperature on the conformations of electrosprayed ions: unfolding of compact ubiquitin conformers from pseudonative and denatured solutions. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 1999;185/186/187:37–47. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ruotolo BT, Giles K, Campuzano I, Sandercock AM, Bateman RH, Robinson CV. Evidence for Macromolecular Protein Rings in the Absence of Bulk Water. Science. 2005;310:1658–1661. doi: 10.1126/science.1120177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Painter AJ, Jaya N, Basha E, Vierling E, Robinson CV, Benesch JLP. Real-Time Monitoring of Protein Complexes Reveals their Quaternary Organization and Dynamics. Chemistry & Biology. 2008;15:246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bernstein SL, Dupuis NF, Lazo ND, Wyttenbach T, Condron MM, Bitan G, Teplow DB, Shea JE, Ruotolo BT, Robinson CV, Bowers MT. Amyloid-beta protein oligomerization and the importance of tetramers and dodecamers in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Chem. 2009;1(4):326–331. doi: 10.1038/nchem.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kaltashov IA, Fabris D, Fenselau CC. Assessment of Gas-Phase Basicities of Protonated Petides by the Kinetic Method. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99(24):10046–10051. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dongre AR, Jones JL, Somogyi A, Wysocki VH. Influence of Peptide Composition, Gas-Phase Basicity, and Chemical Modification on Fragmentation Efficiency: Evidence for the Mobile Proton Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:8365–8374. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schnier PD, Price WD, Jockusch RA, Williams ER. Blackbody infrared radiative dissociation of bradykinin and its analogues: Energetics, dynamics, and evidence for salt-bridge structures in the gas phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118(30):7178–7189. doi: 10.1021/ja9609157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wyttenbach T, Bowers MT. Gas phase conformations of biological molecules: The hydrogen/deuterium exchange mechanism. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999;10(1):9–14. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schnier PD, Williams ER. Analysis of isomeric mixtures using blackbody infrared radiative dissociation: Determining isomeric purity and obtaining individual tandem mass spectra simultaneously. Anal. Chem. 1998;70(14):3033–3041. doi: 10.1021/ac980148p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Countermann AE, Valentine SJ, Srebalus CA, Henderson SC, Hoaglund CS, Clemmer DE. High-Order Structure and Dissociation of Gaseous Peptide Aggregates that are Hidden in Mass Spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998;9:743–759. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(98)00052-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Butcher DJ, Asano KG, Goeringer DE, McLuckey SA. Thermal Dissociation of Gaseous Bradykinin Ions. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1999;103:8664–8671. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gimon-Kinsel RE, Barbacci DC, Russell DH. Conformations of protonated gas-phase bradykinin ions: Evidence for intramolecular hydrogen bonding. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999;34(2):124–136. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199902)34:2<124::AID-JMS772>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Guo Y, Wang J, Javahery G, Thomson BA, Siu KW. M. Ion Mobility Spectrometer with Radial Collisional Focusing. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:266–275. doi: 10.1021/ac048974n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Herrmann KA, Kuppannan K, Wysocki VH. Fragmentation of doubly-protonated peptide ion populations labeled by H/D exchange with CD3OD. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2006;249:93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2005.12.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rodriguez CF, Orlova G, Guo Y, Li X, Siu C–K, Hopkinson AC, Siu KWM. Gaseous Bradykinin and Its Singly, Doubly, and Triply Protonated Forms: A First-Principles Study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110(14):7528–7537. doi: 10.1021/jp046015r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chen H, Eberlin LS, Cooks RG. Neutral fragment mass spectra via ambient thermal dissociation of peptide and protein ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129(18):5880–5886. doi: 10.1021/ja067712v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fernandez-Lima FA, Wei H, Gao YQ, Russell DH. On the Structure Elucidation Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Molecular Dynamics. J. Phys Chem. A. 2009;113(29):8221–8234. doi: 10.1021/jp811150q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wittmer D, Luckenbill BK, Hill HH, Chen YH. Electrospray Ionization Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1994;66:2348–2355. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gillig KJ, Ruotolo B, Stone EG, Russell DH, Fuhrer K, Gonin M, Schultz AJ. Coupling High-Pressure MALDI with Ion Mobility/Orthogonal Time-of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:3965–3971. doi: 10.1021/ac0005619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hoaglund CS, Valentine SJ, Sporleder CR, Reilly JP, Clemmer DE. Three-Dimensional Ion Mobility/TOFMS Analysis of Electrosprayed Biomolecules. Anal. Chem. 1998;70:2236–2242. doi: 10.1021/ac980059c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hoaglund-Hyzer CS, Li J, Clemmer DE. Mobility Labeling for Parallel CID of Ion Mixtures. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:2737–2740. doi: 10.1021/ac0000170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Valentine SJ, Kulchania M, Barnes CAS, Clemmer DE. Multidimensional Separations of Complex Peptide Mixtures: A Combined High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Ion Mobility/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Approach. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001;212:97–109. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tang K, Shvartsburg AA, Lee HN, Prior DC, Buschbach MA, Li FM, Tolmachev AV, Anderson GA, Smith RD. High-Sensitivity Ion Mobility Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry Using Electrodynamic Ion Funnel Interfaces. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:3330–3339. doi: 10.1021/ac048315a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Koeniger SL, Merenbloom SI, Valentine SJ, Jarrold MF, Udseth HR, Smith RD, Clemmer DE. An IMS-IMS Analogue of MS-MS. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:4161–4174. doi: 10.1021/ac051060w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Merenbloom SI, Koeniger SL, Valentine SJ, Plasencia MD, Clemmer DE. IMS-IMS and IMS-IMS-IMS/MS for Separating Peptide and Protein Fragment Ions. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:2802–2809. doi: 10.1021/ac052208e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.a Shaffer SA, Tang KQ, Anderson GA, Prior DC, Udseth HR, Smith RD. A Novel Ion Funnel for Focusing Ions at Elevated Pressure Using Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1997;11:1813–1817. [Google Scholar]; b Shaffer SA, Prior DC, Anderson GA, Udseth HR, Smith RD. An Ion Funnel Interface for Improved Ion Focusing and Sensitivity Using Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1998;70:4111–4119. doi: 10.1021/ac9802170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Counterman AE, Hilderbrand AE, Srebalus Barnes CA, Clemmer DE. Formation of Peptide Aggregates during ESI: Size, Charge, Composition, and Contributions to Noise. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001;12:1020–1035. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pierson NA, Clemmer DE. (manuscript in preparation)
- 91.Shvartsburg AA, Li F, Tang K, Smith RD. High-Resolution FAIMS Using New Planar Geometry Analyzers. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:3706–3714. doi: 10.1021/ac052020v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]