Abstract
The molecular signals that control the maintenance and activation of liver stem/progenitor cells are poorly understood, and the role of liver progenitor cells in hepatic tumorigenesis is unclear. We report here that liver-specific deletion of the neurofibromatosis type 2 (Nf2) tumor suppressor gene in the developing or adult mouse specifically yields a dramatic, progressive expansion of progenitor cells throughout the liver without affecting differentiated hepatocytes. All surviving mice eventually developed both cholangiocellular and hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting that Nf2−/− progenitors can be a cell of origin for these tumors. Despite the suggested link between Nf2 and the Hpo/Wts/Yki signaling pathway in Drosophila, and recent studies linking the corresponding Mst/Lats/Yap pathway to mammalian liver tumorigenesis, our molecular studies suggest that Merlin is not a major regulator of YAP in liver progenitors, and that the overproliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitors is instead driven by aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity. Indeed, pharmacologic inhibition of EGFR blocks the proliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitors in vitro and in vivo, consistent with recent studies indicating that the Nf2-encoded protein Merlin can control the abundance and signaling of membrane receptors such as EGFR. Together, our findings uncover a critical role for Nf2/Merlin in controlling homeostasis of the liver stem cell niche.
Keywords: EGFR, Merlin, NF2, cholangiocellular carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver progenitor
The remarkable regenerative capacity of the mammalian liver is well known (Fausto et al. 2006; Michalopoulos 2007). In response to liver cell loss, existing hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (bile duct cells) re-enter the cell cycle to maintain or restore the original liver volume and biliary tree. When pathological or experimental conditions that block hepatocyte proliferation also exist, facultative liver progenitor cells, known in rodents as “oval cells” (OCs) for their morphological appearance (Farber 1956), emerge and expand from the most terminal branches of the biliary tree (Fausto and Campbell 2003; Fausto 2004; Roskams et al. 2004; Alison 2005; Theise 2006). Like embryonic hepatoblasts (HBs), OCs are considered to be bipotential, and can give rise to both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (Evarts et al. 1987; Sell 2001). Cells that are thought to be equivalent to OCs have been identified in humans, and are presumed to also be liver progenitors (Roskams et al. 2004). However, it has not been possible to define the origin, potential, or molecular features of human liver progenitor cells.
Chemically induced liver tumors in mice often feature an initial expansion of OCs, suggesting that they can be the cell of origin of at least some liver tumors (Sell 2001; Roskams 2006). However, genetically defined animal models that feature primary OC expansion are rare (Jakubowski et al. 2005). Instead, OCs appear in some genetically engineered models of liver tumorigenesis, but only secondary to hepatocellular dysplasia/neoplasia and inflammation (Sandgren et al. 1989; Santoni-Rugiu et al. 1996; Lu et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010), precluding an investigation of the molecular signals that govern OC proliferation, identification of the OC niche, and delineation of the link between OCs and liver tumorigenesis.
The paucity of genetically defined mouse models has also impeded progress in defining the cellular and molecular bases of liver cancer, the third leading cause of cancer death in humans (Llovet et al. 2003). The two most common types of liver cancer are hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC; bile duct cancer); mixed tumors with features of both HCC and CC also occur (Llovet et al. 2003; Blechacz and Gores 2008). Rodent models of liver tumorigenesis have traditionally relied on chemical induction, which yields HCC almost exclusively and CC only rarely (Lee et al. 1997; Sell 2001). Some transgenic models of HCC have been developed, but these involve overexpression of specific oncogenes throughout the liver (Sandgren et al. 1989; Murakami et al. 1993; Dong et al. 2007); genetically engineered mouse models of CC are rare (Kiguchi et al. 2001; Xu et al. 2006). Few examples of liver tumorigenesis in tumor suppressor mutant strains of mice have been reported (Colnot et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010). However, mice carrying a heterozygous mutation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) tumor suppressor gene spontaneously develop both HCC and CC (McClatchey et al. 1998; Kalamarides et al. 2002). Liver tumor initiation and progression was not studied in these animals because of the predominant development of osteosarcomas and other tumors.
The NF2-encoded protein Merlin is closely related to the membrane:cytoskeleton-linking proteins Ezrin, Radixin, and Moesin (the ERM proteins), and can associate with a number of membrane-associated proteins and receptors (McClatchey and Fehon 2009). Recent studies reveal that Merlin can control the abundance of certain membrane receptors in mammalian cells and in flies, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (Maitra et al. 2006; Curto et al. 2007; Cole et al. 2008; Lallemand et al. 2009). In mammalian cells, Merlin can block EGFR internalization and signaling specifically in response to cell:cell contact, providing one explanation for the loss of contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation exhibited by Nf2-deficient cells (Morrison et al. 2001; Lallemand et al. 2003; McClatchey and Giovannini 2005; Okada et al. 2005; Curto et al. 2007; Morris and McClatchey 2009). Indeed, pharmacologic inhibitors of EGFR block the overproliferation of Nf2−/− cells in culture and within Nf2−/− renal tumors in vivo (Curto et al. 2007). Increasing evidence indicates that physical communication between stem cells and the surrounding niche regulates their proliferation and ability to divide asymmetrically, which could render them particularly sensitive to Nf2 loss (Fuchs et al. 2004; Yamashita et al. 2005; Scadden 2006).
We wanted to study the role of Nf2/Merlin in controlling proliferation in the developing and adult mouse liver in order to better understand the predisposition of Nf2 heterozygous mutant mice to liver tumorigenesis and the potential role of Nf2-regulated pathways in human liver malignancies. We found that deletion of Nf2 in the developing liver leads to a rapid and dramatic expansion of liver progenitor cells throughout the liver, and subsequently to the development of CC and metastatic HCC. Loss of Nf2 in the adult liver yields equivalent histopathological lesions, suggesting that Nf2 is required to both establish and maintain the hepatic progenitor cell niche; all of these mice also go on to develop both CC and HCC. Notably, Nf2−/− hepatocytes in these models remained quiescent, and were even able to participate in normal liver regeneration, indicating that progenitor cells are uniquely sensitive to Nf2 loss. Despite recently established links between the Drosophila Nf2 ortholog and the Hpo/Wts/Yki proliferation control pathway in flies (Hamaratoglu et al. 2006; Hamaratoglu et al. 2009; Baumgartner et al. 2010; Genevet et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2010), and between the corresponding mammalian Mst/Lats/Yap pathway in hepatocyte quiescence and tumorigenesis (Zender et al. 2006; Dong et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010), our studies suggest that Merlin is not a major regulator of Mst/Lats/Yap in mouse liver progenitors. Instead, our studies suggest that, as in other cell types, a key function of Merlin in these cells is to negatively regulate the activity of EGFR. Thus, pharmacologic inhibition of EGFR blocks the overproliferation of liver progenitors in this model, consistent with studies that conclude that EGFR signaling promotes OC proliferation (Evarts et al. 1993; Nagy et al. 1996) and liver tumorigenesis in humans and rodents (Jhappan et al. 1990; Breuhahn et al. 2006; Tanabe et al. 2008). These studies yield novel insights into the cellular and molecular basis of liver progenitor homeostasis, the biological function of the Nf2 tumor suppressor, and the relationship between liver progenitors and tumorigenesis.
Results
Nf2 deletion causes liver progenitor expansion and hepatomegaly
To isolate the consequences of Nf2 deficiency to the liver, we crossed conditional Nf2 mutant (Nf2lox/lox) mice to transgenic Alb-Cre mice in which the albumin promoter drives expression of the Cre recombinase in the developing and adult liver (Postic and Magnuson 2000). Liver-specific deletion of Nf2 led to marked abdominal enlargement beginning at 6–8 wk of age due to massive hepatomegaly, with livers representing up to one-third of the total body weight (Fig. 1A,B; Supplemental Fig. 1A,C). Surprisingly, histological examination revealed that this was not due to an increase in hepatocyte number or size, but instead to extensive hyperplasia of undifferentiated cells that fit the morphological description of facultative mouse liver progenitor cells known as OCs (Fig. 1C,D). These lesions originated from the portal tracts and infiltrated the surrounding parenchyma, leaving the centrilobular veins largely intact (Fig. 1D). Indeed, while cells within these lesions were highly proliferative, islands of neighboring Nf2−/− hepatocytes remained quiescent and exhibited no apparent defects (Fig. 1D,F). Apoptotic cells were not detected in the lesions or in neighboring hepatocytes (data not shown).
The albumin promoter becomes active in HBs at embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) in the developing mouse liver, and its activity is maintained postnatally in mature hepatocytes but not in mature cholangiocytes (Shiojiri 1981). Bona fide OCs have not been described in the embryo, but their correspondence with HBs within the primitive biliary tree has been suggested (Shiojiri et al. 1991). In fact, periductular hyperplasia is already detectable in newborn Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox livers, which are otherwise normal (Fig. 2B). Thus, the earliest histopathological consequences of Nf2 deficiency are restricted to the prospective locations of the adult liver stem cell niches from which OCs arise (Theise et al. 1999; Kuwahara et al. 2008; Sell and Leffert 2008), suggesting that Merlin plays an important role in the initial establishment of the liver progenitor niche.
The expansion of OC-containing lesions in postnatal Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox livers is progressive, yielding cords that radiate from and bridge the portal tracts to strikingly delineate the polygonal architecture of hepatic lobuli (Fig. 2C). As proliferation of OCs and associated cholangiocyte-like cells proceeds, immature neoductuli are formed (Fig. 2B). Despite some regional variation, the phenotypic penetrance is complete, ultimately leading to a diffuse and massive OC expansion that surrounds and progressively compromises islands of normal-appearing hepatocytes (Fig. 2C,D). Thus, Nf2 loss is sufficient for the sustained overproliferation of liver progenitors in vivo.
Consistent with classic models of OC hyperplasia in the mouse, cells throughout the Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox liver lesions were marked by anti-pan-cytokeratin (panCK), A6, and anti-CD34 antibodies (Fig. 3B,C,E,F,H,I,K,L,N; Omori et al. 1997; Crosby et al. 2001; Jakubowski et al. 2005; Kofman et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2006). In contrast, in the wild-type liver, expression of the panCK and A6 antigens are restricted to bile duct epithelial cells (BECs) (Fig. 3D,J,M); likewise, CD34 is normally expressed only by BECs and endothelial cells (Fig. 3G,J). Cells within the lesions did not express α-smooth muscle actin, as would be seen upon activation of hepatic stellate cells during fibrosis, and we did not detect infiltrating lymphocytes or other signs of inflammation (data not shown). Taken together, these observations suggest that deletion of Nf2 yields an early, primary, and specific expansion of liver progenitor cells without affecting differentiated hepatocytes.
Deregulated EGFR signaling drives the overproliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitors in vitro and in vivo
Recent studies suggest that Merlin and the related tumor suppressor Expanded can function together to regulate the Hpo/Wts/Yki tumor suppressor pathway in Drosophila, but it is not clear whether they are key regulators of the analogous mammalian Mst/Lats/Yap pathway (Edgar 2006; Hamaratoglu et al. 2006, 2009; Baumgartner et al. 2010; Genevet et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2010). If Merlin regulates Mst/Lats/Yap in mammalian liver cells, the presence or absence of Nf2 should confer changes in the phosphorylation and/or localization of the transcriptional activator Yap1 (Zhao et al. 2008). However, the localization and phosphorylation of Yap1 is not altered by endogenous or exogenous Merlin and/or Expanded in cultured OCs derived from early Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox lesions (for their derivation and characterization, see the Materials and Methods; Supplemental Fig. 2) or HBs, even at very high cell density (Supplemental Figs. 3A–E, 4B,C; J Gervais and AI McClatchey, unpubl.). In contrast, exogenous Lats did yield a clear increase in cytoplasmic Yap1 in both HBs and OCs (Supplemental Fig. 3E,F; data not shown). Similarly, the expression of Yap1 target genes was not altered by the presence or absence of Merlin in confluent OCs or HBs (Supplemental Fig. 4A,B). Most importantly, shRNA-mediated knockdown of Yap1 did not rescue the loss of contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation exhibited by cultured Nf2−/− OCs (Supplemental Fig. 4C,D). Thus, Merlin does not appear to be a major regulator of Yap1 in liver progenitors, and Yap1 does not mediate the overproliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitors.
We found previously that Merlin can associate with and negatively regulate EGFR internalization and signaling specifically in contacting cells (Curto et al. 2007; Cole et al. 2008). Indeed, Nf2−/− cells of several types, including OCs and HBs, fail to down-regulate EGFR signaling at high cell density or to undergo contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation—phenotypes that are reversed by pharmacologic inhibition of EGFR (Curto et al. 2007). To determine whether persistent EGFR signaling drives the overproliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitors in vivo, we treated a small cohort of 7-wk-old Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice with erlotinib (100 mg/kg in 6% captisol twice daily; n = 4) or vehicle (6% captisol twice daily; n = 3). After only 10 d of erlotinib treatment, we observed a decrease in lesion size and in liver:body weight ratio in all erlotinib-treated mice (Fig. 4A,B,F,G). This was accompanied by a marked reduction in the number of BrdU-positive cells within the lesions (Fig. 4C–E), and a corresponding decrease in the levels of pTyr and of known EGFR targets in these same cells (Fig. 4H; Supplemental Fig. 5). Notably, erlotinib treatment had no effect on Yap1 levels or localization in these cells (data not shown). Collectively, these data suggest that persistent EGFR signaling drives the overproliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo.
Liver tumorigenesis in Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice
Between 6 and 30 wk of age, OC hyperplasia leads to the death of ∼70% of Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice (Fig. 5A), with a progressive loss of hepatocyte-derived mass (see Fig. 2C,D) and frequent ascites secondary to portal hypertension. Both genders were affected equally. All mice that survived beyond 30 wk exhibited increasing dysplasia and eventually developed frank liver tumors (Fig. 5B–G; Supplemental Fig. 6). Surviving Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice invariably developed both HCC and CC within the same liver (Fig. 5B–D). The HCCs exhibit a striking variety of histopathological types including trabecular, solid, pseudoductular, and acinar hepatocellular morphologies (Supplemental Fig. 6). Early CCs strongly resemble the “cholangiolocellular” subtype described in humans (Komuta et al. 2008) that exhibits poorly differentiated characteristics and is believed to originate from the Canal of Hering—a putative location of the adult liver stem cell niche (Fig. 5D; Supplemental Fig. 6). Transitional cellular and histological features intermediate between HCC and CC were also frequently observed (Supplemental Fig. 6). As seen in Nf2+/− mice, HCC metastases were found in the lungs of nearly all (13 out of 14) of these mice after 1 yr (Fig. 5E–G; McClatchey et al. 1998). Other than lung metastases, no other extrahepatic lesions were detected. By crossing Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice with GtRosa26lox/stop/lox reporter mice, we confirmed that virtually all cells in primary CCs, HCCs, and corresponding metastases are lacZ-positive, and therefore originated from cells that expressed the Cre recombinase at some point and became Nf2-deficient (Fig. 5F,G; data not shown). This was confirmed by immunoblotting of dissected liver and tumor tissues (Supplemental Fig. 1C). The complete penetrance of both tumor types subsequent to OC expansion is consistent with the possibility that the tumors in these mice can derive from unregulated Nf2−/− OCs.
OC proliferation and tumorigenesis upon Nf2 deletion in adult mice: role of proliferative stimuli
To determine whether loss of Nf2 must occur in the context of the developing liver in order for OC expansion and tumorigenesis to ensue, we deleted Nf2 in the adult liver by injecting a Cre-expressing adenovirus (Ad-Cre) into 8-wk-old Nf2lox/lox mice (Fig. 6A). After 8–12 mo, only mild periportal hyperplasia was detected in the livers of these mice (Fig. 6B,D); hepatocyte alterations were not detectable, and neither CC nor HCC developed. We reasoned that the highly proliferative context of the developing liver in Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox embryos might play a critical role in the response to Nf2 loss, as the normal adult liver is mitotically quiescent. Therefore, we induced proliferation in the liver of Ad-Cre-injected mice via partial hepatectomy (PHx) (Higgins and Anderson 1931). As seen in Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice, all of these mice developed marked primary OC hyperplasia and subsequent HCC and CC (Fig. 6C,E; data not shown). OC hyperplasia was never seen upon PHx of control mice. As an alternative strategy, we generated Mx1-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice in which Cre expression can be induced throughout the liver upon stimulation of the interferon pathway via intraperitoneal injection of polyIC (polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid) (Fig. 6F; Kuhn et al. 1995). Again, Cre-mediated inactivation of Nf2 in adult Mx1-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice resulted in only a modest activation of OCs after 5–8 mo, despite clear evidence of Nf2 recombination/loss throughout the liver (Fig. 6G; Supplemental Fig. 1B). However, performing a PHx after polyIC induction led to a marked increase in OC hyperplasia, as well as HCC and CC development with complete penetrance (Fig. 6H,I). Notably, after PHx, liver regeneration itself occurs normally in the absence of Merlin, and Nf2−/− hepatocytes re-enter a quiescent state after regeneration is complete; this is followed by the appearance and expansion of OCs. Thus, the proliferative stimulus provided by PHx appears to specifically unleash the overproliferation of otherwise quiescent Nf2−/− liver progenitors, and is not required for their continued proliferation. This is consistent with a role for Merlin in down-regulating growth factor receptor output in liver cells. In fact, intraperitoneal injection of EGF into Mx1-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice yielded a “superinduction” of phosphorylated EGFR and the known EGFR signaling targets pSTAT3 and pAKT in the Nf2−/− (polyIC-induced) relative to the control liver (no polyIC-mediated induction of Cre expression) (Supplemental Fig. 7). Taken together, these findings suggest that Merlin function is required to establish and maintain quiescence of liver progenitor cells.
Stem/progenitor cell-derived tumorigenesis
The overproliferation of OCs preceding the development of both HCC and CC in all three models suggests that the tumors originate from these liver progenitor cells. To determine whether undifferentiated Nf2−/− liver progenitors can become neoplastic, we generated clonal lines of Nf2-expressing (wild-type) or Nf2-deficient HBs that also expressed a lacZ reporter from E14.5 embryonic mouse livers, and transplanted them into the livers of adult immunocompromised nu/nu mice (Supplemental Fig. 1D). Five weeks post-transplantation, lacZ+/Nf2-expressing HBs were scattered uniformly throughout the liver (Fig. 7A,B). In contrast, livers from mice transplanted with Nf2-deficient HBs revealed multiple foci of proliferating undifferentiated cells that progressed within only 3–4 wk to form larger neoplasias that exhibited both cholangiocytic and hepatocytic features (Fig. 7C–F). These data support a cell-autonomous requirement for Merlin in controlling liver progenitor proliferation and neoplastic transformation; they also indicate that liver neoplasia can arise from clonal Nf2−/− liver progenitors.
Discussion
The results presented here provide the first example of a single gene (Nf2) whose disruption is sufficient to effect a primary expansion of both embryonic and adult liver progenitor cells in vivo, and to reproducibly yield both major forms of liver cancer. The lesions that arise upon deletion of Nf2 in embryonic or adult mouse liver strongly resemble classic models of chemically induced OC expansion both histologically and in terms of marker expression (Omori et al. 1997; Jakubowski et al. 2005; Kofman et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2006). Our phenotype also closely resembles the OC expansion seen upon transgenic overexpression of the TNF-like cytokine TWEAK (Jakubowski et al. 2005). However, in contrast to the Nf2−/− liver, lesions in TWEAK-overexpressing livers exhibit increased apoptosis and are not progressive. Indeed, tumors do not develop in these mice. The precise origin of OCs has been long debated; most studies conclude that they arise from unidentified intrahepatic stem cells (Fausto and Campbell 2003; Fausto 2004; Theise 2006), although a hematopoietic origin has been suggested (Petersen et al. 1999; Thorgeirsson and Grisham 2006). Recently, label retention studies have partially substantiated the long-held notion that OCs arise from intraductal and periductal locations within the most proximal branches of the biliary tree (Kuwahara et al. 2008); this is precisely where OC expansion is first seen in Nf2-deficient livers. In fact, the initial appearance of OCs in newborn animals, despite more pervasive expression of Alb-Cre, suggests that Nf2 is specifically required for OC quiescence during the establishment of the OC niche. Together with the development of additional sophisticated genetic tools, this model could be used to define the cellular origin of the OC and the physical location of its niche.
Our data suggest that Nf2 mutant liver tumors are derived from Nf2−/− progenitors for the following reasons: First, OC expansion always precedes the development of both HCC and CC, regardless of whether Nf2 loss occurs in the embryo or adult. Second, lesions in all three models (Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox, Ad-Cre-injected Nf2lox/lox, and polyIC-induced Mx1-Cre;Nf2lox/lox) always contain transitional cellular morphologies with both hepatocytic and biliary features. Third, transplantation of clonal Nf2−/− HBs yielded the expansion of undifferentiated cells followed by the development of neoplasias bearing cholangiocytic and hepatocytic features, indicating that Nf2−/− liver progenitors can initiate liver tumors. We cannot exclude the possibility that HCCs can develop from differentiated hepatocytes in the Nf2-deficient liver, given that hepatocytes continue to express Alb-Cre. However, Nf2 deficiency is clearly not sufficient for the overproliferation or transformation of differentiated hepatocytes, as Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox, Ad-Cre-injected Nf2lox/lox, and induced Mx1-Cre;Nf2lox/lox mice harbor many Nf2-deficient hepatocytes that do not exhibit gross morphological alterations or aberrant BrdU incorporation in vivo; in fact, liver regeneration occurs normally in these mice, indicating that, even after receiving a proliferative stimulus and undergoing cell division, Nf2−/− hepatocytes can appropriately re-enter a quiescent state. This suggests that either additional mutations cooperate with Nf2 loss to drive the development of HCC in this model, or HCC develops from Nf2−/− progenitors that adopt an improperly differentiated state. Indeed, recent studies document the development of HCC from OCs in carcinogen-treated rats, and suggest that a subset of human HCCs exhibit a gene expression signature that is similar to that of both rodent OCs and HBs (Lee et al. 2006; Andersen et al. 2010).
These models of liver-specific Nf2 deficiency provide a unique opportunity to identify the molecular signals that regulate homeostasis of both embryonic and adult liver progenitors. We found that deletion of Nf2 in the liver, as in other cell types, yields deregulated EGFR signaling, and that pharmacologic EGFR inhibitors reverse the overproliferation of Nf2−/− progenitors in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 4; Curto et al. 2007). This, together with the superinduction of EGFR activity in the induced Mx-Cre;Nf2lox/lox liver, strongly supports a primary role for aberrant EGFR activity in OC expansion and tumorigenesis in the absence of Nf2, although other receptors may also be important (McClatchey and Giovannini 2005; Maitra et al. 2006). This is consistent with many studies that have indicated a causal role for EGFR signaling in OC proliferation and liver tumorigenesis in humans and mice (Jhappan et al. 1990; Evarts et al. 1993; Nagy et al. 1996; Yoon et al. 2004; Breuhahn et al. 2006; Blechacz and Gores 2008). Although NF2 mutations have not yet been reported in human liver cancers, our data argue for a systematic mutational analysis across a large, diverse panel of liver tumors; indeed, NF2 mutations could be unique to a subset of tumors that are of progenitor cell origin (Lee et al. 2006; Roskams 2006; Sell and Leffert 2008; Andersen et al. 2010). In fact, the broad consequences of Nf2 loss in development and tumorigenesis in the mouse predict an underappreciated role for NF2 mutations in human cancer. As such, our discovery that kidney-specific Nf2 deletion yields renal carcinomas in the mouse has been complemented recently by the discovery of NF2 mutations in a subset of sporadic human renal tumors (Forbes et al. 2008; Morris and McClatchey 2009; Dalgliesh et al. 2010).
Despite the recent assertion that a critical function of Merlin is to negatively regulate the Hpo/Wts/Yki tumor suppressor pathway in Drosophila (Hamaratoglu et al. 2006, 2009; Baumgartner et al. 2010; Genevet et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2010), together with recent studies linking the corresponding mammalian Mst/Lats/Yap pathway to liver tumorigenesis in mice and humans (Zender et al. 2006; Dong et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010), our studies suggest an important function for Merlin in the liver that is independent of this pathway. Indeed, the reported consequences of inactivating the Mst/Lats/Yap pathway in the liver, either by eliminating Mst1/2 or overexpressing YAP, are quite distinct from that of deleting Nf2 (Camargo et al. 2007; Dong et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010). In fact, overexpression of YAP or deletion of its negative regulators, Mst1 and Mst2, in the liver primarily affects hepatocytes, yielding aberrant hepatocyte morphology, proliferation, and, eventually, HCC that is not preceded by OC expansion (Camargo et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010). In contrast, deletion of Nf2 in the liver specifically yields an early and dramatic expansion of progenitor cells without detectable alterations in neighboring hepatocytes, including any increase in nuclear Yap1 (data not shown). Instead, high levels of cytoplasmic and nuclear Yap1 were apparent in some HCC foci and metastases and not in others (Supplemental Fig. 8), suggesting that Nf2 deficiency is not sufficient to yield Yap1 activation in hepatocytes. Instead, it is possible that other mutations cooperate with Nf2 loss to achieve full YAP activation. Similarly, we could not detect a major role for Merlin in regulating Yap1 in OCs, and we found that Yap1 was not required for the overproliferation of cultured OCs. Instead, we provide evidence that the overproliferation of Nf2−/− liver progenitors in vitro and in vivo is EGFR-dependent.
Our previous molecular studies indicate that Merlin can mediate contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation by coordinating the establishment of cell:cell contact with down-regulation of EGFR signaling (Curto et al. 2007; Cole et al. 2008). In vivo, all cells are in contact, and contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation must be overridden and re-established; for example, during the developmental expansion of tissues. Stem/progenitor cells must be constantly poised to override contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation, and may therefore be particularly sensitive to loss of Merlin function. Indeed, increasing evidence supports a critical role for physical communication between progenitor cells and their niche in governing stem cell division (Fuchs et al. 2004; Scadden 2006). Thus, studies of the relationship between germline stem cells and their niche in Drosophila underscore the importance of reciprocal coordination between intercellular contacts and receptor signaling in controlling niche homeostasis (Yamashita et al. 2005). Similarly, it has been suggested that cadherin-mediated communication between hematopoietic stem cells and the bone marrow niche in mammals governs their proliferation (Adams et al. 2006). Notably, a recent study revealed that Merlin is necessary for the function and structure of the hematopoietic stem cell niche, and, consequently, for limiting hematopoietic stem cell numbers (Larsson et al. 2008). Most studies conclude that the adult liver progenitor cell resides near or at the Canal of Hering, where cholangiocytes and hepatocytes come into physical contact with one another (Theise et al. 1999; Paku et al. 2001; Kuwahara et al. 2008). Our studies reveal a key role for Merlin in establishing and maintaining the liver progenitor cell niche. Although further studies will be required to more precisely define the role of Merlin in regulating liver progenitor proliferation in vivo, we speculate that it may function to coordinate physical contacts and growth factor signaling among different cell types in this unique setting of intercellular communication.
Materials and methods
Animals
Homozygous Nf2lox/lox mice (FVB/N) were crossed with transgenic mice expressing the Cre recombinase under a liver-specific albumin promoter (Alb-Cre) (B6.Cg-Tg[Alb-cre]21Mgn/J; Jackson Laboratories) (Giovannini et al. 2000; Postic and Magnuson 2000) or the Interferon-α-inducible Mx1 promoter (Mx1-Cre) (Tg[Mx1-cre]1Cgn/J; Jackson Laboratories) (Kuhn et al. 1995). To monitor Cre-mediated excision, mice were crossed to the reporter strain GtRosa26lox/stop/lox (B6;129-Gt[ROSA]26Sortm1Sho/J; Jackson Laboratories) in which removal of a floxed stop cassette allows expression of the β-galactosidase/LacZ reporter upon Cre-mediated recombination (Mao et al. 1999). Mixed-gender animals were used for all experiments. Immunocompromised 5-wk-old female nu/nu mice used for transplantation experiments were obtained from the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cox7 facility.
Animal procedures
All animal procedures were performed according to federal and institutional guidelines, and were approved by the MGH Subcommittee on Research Animal Care. BrdU (Sigma) was injected intraperitoneally at 100 mg/kg body weight, and mice were sacrificed after 2 h. Activation of the Mx1 promoter was induced via two intraperitoneal injections of 250 μg of polyIC (Sigma) at 48-h intervals. EGF (Peprotech) was injected intraperitoneally at 10 μg/g body weight, and mice were sacrificed after 30 min. Deletion of Nf2 in adult Nf2lox/lox mouse livers was induced via tail vein injection of 150 × 106 plaque-forming units (pfu) of a Cre-expressing adenovirus (Ad5CMV-Cre; University of Iowa Gene Transfer Vector Core). Compensatory liver cell proliferation was induced by two-third PHx performed according to that described previously in the rat (Higgins and Anderson 1931).
Erlotinib (ChemieTek) was solubilized at 10 mg/mL in a 6% w/v aqueous solution of Captisol (CyDex Pharmaceuticals). Four Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox and three Nf2lox/lox control mice were treated by intraperitoneal injection of erlotinib at 100 mg/kg body weight once every 12 h for 10 d. Three Alb-Cre;Nf2lox/lox and three Nf2lox/lox control mice were treated on the same schedule with vehicle alone, with no detectable effect.
Transplantation of 3 × 106 HBs into the livers of 8- to 9-wk-old female nude mice was performed via intrasplenic injection (Ponder et al. 1991). To increase engraftment of transplanted HBs into the liver (Laconi et al. 1998), a proliferative stimulus was provided by a two-third PHx performed at the time of the splenic injection.
Cell culture
Clonal HB lines were established according to the method described by Strick-Marchand and Weiss (2002) with some modifications. The liver of E14.5 embryos were excised, minced, and dissociated in Liver Dissociation Medium (Gibco-Invitrogen) (30 + 30 min rocking at 37°C), and the cell suspension was plated on two collagen I-coated, 100-mm dishes in F12-DMEM medium (1:1) containing 10% FBS, 100 ng/mL EGF, 60 ng/mL IGF-II, and 10 μg/mL insulin. Cultures were fed with fresh medium twice a week until epithelial clones appeared. Several clones were isolated using cloning cylinders and were further expanded. Nf2 deletion in cultured HBs was achieved via adenoviral expression of the Cre-recombinase as described for mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Lallemand et al. 2003). Nf2−/− OC lines (OCs, also dubbed “liver-derived cells” or LDCs) (Curto et al. 2007) were obtained from the liver of a 12-wk-old AlbCre;Nf2lox/lox mouse with marked oval/biliary cell hyperplasia without detectable hepatocellular dysplasia or neoplasia. The liver was excised, minced, and dissociated as described above, and cells were cultured in 10% FBS-DMEM. Clonal cell lines with uniform epithelial morphologies were established by limiting dilution. The generation and use of adenoviral vectors expressing Nf2wt have been described (Lallemand et al. 2003). Infections with retroviral vectors encoding Lats2 (Zhang et al. 2008)—shRNAs targeting Yap (sh1877; sh1883; a kind gift of Dr. Lars Zender, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany) and Nf2—were performed as described (Cole et al. 2008). Growth curves were performed as described (Curto et al. 2007).
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Freshly dissected tissues were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde–PBS (phosphate-buffered saline), processed, and paraffin-embedded. Five-micron sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or processed further for immunohistochemistry. Antigen retrieval was done by boiling in 10 mM citrate buffer (20 min) for Yap1 detection, and 0.1% trypsin (20 min at 37°C) for panCK detection. Sections were incubated for 10 min in 0.3% H2O2-methanol; blocked 1 h in PBS, 1% BSA, and 10% normal goat serum; and incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-Yap1 (1:40; Cell Signaling #4912), anti-panCK (1:1000; Dako #Z0622). BrdU-labeled cells were detected using a kit (Zymed) following the manufacturer's instructions. The Vectastain Elite kit (Vector Laboratories) was used for HRP-based chromogenic detection of secondary antibodies. Whole-mount LacZ staining of 2- to 3-mm-thick sections was used to detect β-galactosidase activity in liver and lung tissues. Freshly dissected tissues were fixed (0.2% glutaraldehyde, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 M NaPO4 buffer at pH 7.3), washed three times in wash buffer (2 mM MgCl2, 0.02% NP-40, 0.01% deoxycholate, 0.1 M NaPO4 buffer at pH 7.3), stained overnight in wash buffer (1 mg/mL X-gal, 5 mM K-ferricyanide, 5 mM K-ferrocyanide) at 37°C with gentle agitation, and post-fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde–PBS. Some specimens were processed further and paraffin-embedded, and 10-μm sections were counterstained with eosin or nuclear fast red for histological examination.
Immunofluorescent detection of CD34, panCK, and A6 were carried out on cryosections of frozen, OCT-embedded tissue. Sections were fixed in methanol/acetone (1:1, v/v), blocked in 10% goat serum in PBS for 1 h, and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary rat anti-mouse CD34 (1:100; BD-Pharmingen 550537), rabbit anti-cytokeratin (wide spectrum screening; anti-panCK) (1:200; Dako Z0622), and rat anti-A6 (1:40; kindly provided by Valentina Factor) in 1% BSA-PBS, followed by secondary anti-rat Alexa488 (1:200; Molecular Probes) and secondary Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit (1:200; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories), respectively, and mounted (Vectashield, Vector Laboratories). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Two-dimensional epifluorescence images were acquired on a Nikon Eclypse 90i microscope with a Q-Imaging 2000R camera and NIS AR2.3 software. Final images were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS3.
Immunofluorescence
OCs or HBs were plated on glass coverslips and infected with Ad-Nf2wt (5 multiplicity of infection [m.o.i.]) or Ad-Cre (20 m.o.i.), respectively, when subconfluent. Four days to 5 d after reaching confluence, cells were fixed for 15 min at room temperature in 4% PFA-cytoskeletal buffer (10 mM 2-[N-Morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid sodium salt [MES] at pH 6.3, 138 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA), and were subsequently permeabilized for 15 min in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. Coverslips were blocked in 10% goat serum in PBS for 1 h and were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-Yap1 (100; Cell Signaling #49121) in 1% BSA-PBS. Costaining for Merlin was performed by conjugation of the anti-NF2 antibody (1:400; Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-331) with the Zenon Rabbit IgG labeling kit (Molecular Probes) following the manufacturer's instructions. Coverslips were rinsed in PBS, incubated for 1 h at room temperature in FITC- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories), and mounted (Vectashield, Vector Laboratories). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Two-dimensional epifluorescence images were acquired on a Nikon Eclypse 90i microscope with a Q-Imaging 2000R camera and NIS AR2.3 software. Final images were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS3.
Immunoblotting
Liver tissue was homogenized at 4°C in 10 vol (w/v) of RIPA buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 μg/mL each aprotinin, pepstatin, leupeptin) using a Teflon Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder. Protein extracts from liver (120 μg per lane) or cultured cells (30 μg per lane) were analyzed by Western blotting using the following primary antibodies: EGFR-pY992 (#2235), EGFR-pY1068 (#2234), STAT3-pY705 (#9145), AKT-pS473 (#4060), YAP-pS127 (#4911), and YAP (#4912), all at 1:1000 (Cell Signaling); NF2 (#sc-331) at 1:5,000 and EGFR (#sc-03) at 1:1000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); Lats2 (#A300-479A) at 1:1000 (Bethyl); Orc2 (#920-4-41) at 1:1000 (BD-Pharmingen). HRP-conjugated secondary anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies were from Amersham. For nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation, we used the NE-PER kit from Pierce following the manufacturer's instructions.
PCR
Genotyping PCR from tissues and cells was performed as described for Nf2 (Giovannini et al. 2000), Cre recombinase, and GtRosa26 (Jackson Laboratory; http://jaxmice.jax.org/pub-cgi/protocols/protocols.sh?objtype=prot_list). For semiquantitative and real-time quantitative RT–PCR, total cellular RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen), and reverse-transcribed with MMLV-RT (Promega) using oligo-dT primers. Semiquantitative RT–PCR was carried out as described in Tanimizu et al. (2003) using primers described therein. Fast Start Universal SYBR Green mix (Roche Applied Science) was used to amplify 0.5 μL of the RT reaction in a final 25-μL volume. Triplicate samples were run on a LightCycler 480 System (Roche Applied Science). Cycling conditions were denaturation for 15 sec at 95°C, annealing for 1 min at 60°C, and extension for 1 min at 60°C, 40 cycles. Expression of the β-actin gene was used as an internal control. Primer sequences in 5′ to 3′ orientation were as follows: AFP, f-TTCGTATTCCAACAGGAGGC and r-CAGACTTCCTGGTCCTGGGC; βActin, f-CTAAGGCCAACCGTGAAAAG and r-ACCAGAGGCATACAGGGACA; Birc2, f-GAAGAAAATGCTGACCCTACAGA and r-GCTCATCATGACGACATCTTTC; Birc3, f-AGAGAGGAGCAGATGGAGCA and r-TTTGTTCTTCCGGATTAGTGC; Sox4, f-CCTCGCTCTCCTCGTCCT and r-TCGTCTTCGAACTCGTCGT; Myc, f-CCTAGTGCTGCATGAGGAGA and r-TCTTCCTCATCTTCTTGCTCTTC.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Othon Iliopoulos and all members of the McClatchey laboratory for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript, Valentina Factor (NIH, Bethesda) for the A6 antibody, Lars Zender for the Yap shRNA expression vectors, Daniel Haber and Jianmin Zhang for the Lats expression vectors, and Anna Levitz and the Pathology Core Facility for histological support. This work was supported by The International Human Frontier Science Program Organization to S.B., and by grants from the Tucker-Gosnell Foundation, Department of Defense (DOD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Children's Tumor Foundation (CTF) to A.I.M.
Footnotes
Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1938710.
Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
References
- Adams GB, Chabner KT, Alley IR, Olson DP, Szczepiorkowski ZM, Poznansky MC, Kos CH, Pollak MR, Brown EM, Scadden DT 2006. Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor. Nature 439: 599–603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alison MR 2005. Liver stem cells: Implications for hepatocarcinogenesis. Stem Cell Rev 1: 253–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersen JB, Loi R, Perra A, Factor VM, Ledda-Columbano GM, Columbano A, Thorgeirsson SS 2010. Progenitor-derived hepatocellular carcinoma model in the rat. Hepatology 51: 1401–1409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumgartner R, Poernbacher I, Buser N, Hafen E, Stocker H 2010. The WW domain protein Kibra acts upstream of Hippo in Drosophila. Dev Cell 18: 309–316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blechacz B, Gores GJ 2008. Cholangiocarcinoma: Advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology 48: 308–321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breuhahn K, Longerich T, Schirmacher P 2006. Dysregulation of growth factor signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 25: 3787–3800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Camargo FD, Gokhale S, Johnnidis JB, Fu D, Bell GW, Jaenisch R, Brummelkamp TR 2007. YAP1 increases organ size and expands undifferentiated progenitor cells. Curr Biol 17: 2054–2060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole BK, Curto M, Chan AW, McClatchey AI 2008. Localization to the cortical cytoskeleton is necessary for Nf2/merlin-dependent epidermal growth factor receptor silencing. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1274–1284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colnot S, Decaens T, Niwa-Kawakita M, Godard C, Hamard G, Kahn A, Giovannini M, Perret C 2004. Liver-targeted disruption of Apc in mice activates β-catenin signaling and leads to hepatocellular carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 17216–17221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crosby HA, Kelly DA, Strain AJ 2001. Human hepatic stem-like cells isolated using c-kit or CD34 can differentiate into biliary epithelium. Gastroenterology 120: 534–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curto M, Cole BK, Lallemand D, Liu CH, McClatchey AI 2007. Contact-dependent inhibition of EGFR signaling by Nf2/Merlin. J Cell Biol 177: 893–903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dalgliesh GL, Furge K, Greenman C, Chen L, Bignell G, Butler A, Davies H, Edkins S, Hardy C, Latimer C, et al. 2010. Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes. Nature 463: 360–363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, Gayyed MF, Anders RA, Maitra A, Pan D 2007. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 130: 1120–1133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar BA 2006. From cell structure to transcription: Hippo forges a new path. Cell 124: 267–273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evarts RP, Nagy P, Marsden E, Thorgeirsson SS 1987. A precursor-product relationship exists between oval cells and hepatocytes in rat liver. Carcinogenesis 8: 1737–1740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evarts RP, Hu Z, Fujio K, Marsden ER, Thorgeirsson SS 1993. Activation of hepatic stem cell compartment in the rat: Role of transforming growth factor α, hepatocyte growth factor, and acidic fibroblast growth factor in early proliferation. Cell Growth Differ 4: 555–561 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farber E 1956. Similarities in the sequence of early histological changes induced in the liver of the rat by ethionine, 2-acetylamino-fluorene, and 3′-methyl-4-dimethylaminoazobenzene. Cancer Res 16: 142–148 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fausto N 2004. Liver regeneration and repair: Hepatocytes, progenitor cells, and stem cells. Hepatology 39: 1477–1487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fausto N, Campbell JS 2003. The role of hepatocytes and oval cells in liver regeneration and repopulation. Mech Dev 120: 117–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fausto N, Campbell JS, Riehle KJ 2006. Liver regeneration. Hepatology 43: S45–S53 doi: 10.1002/hep.20969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forbes SA, Bhamra G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, Clements J, Menzies A, Teague JW, Futreal PA, Stratton MR 2008. The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet 57: 10.11.1–10.11.26 doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs E, Tumbar T, Guasch G 2004. Socializing with the neighbors: Stem cells and their niche. Cell 116: 769–778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genevet A, Wehr MC, Brain R, Thompson BJ, Tapon N 2010. Kibra is a regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo signaling network. Dev Cell 18: 300–308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giovannini M, Robanus-Maandag E, van der Valk M, Niwa-Kawakita M, Abramowski V, Goutebroze L, Woodruff JM, Berns A, Thomas G 2000. Conditional biallelic Nf2 mutation in the mouse promotes manifestations of human neurofibromatosis type 2. Genes Dev 14: 1617–1630 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamaratoglu F, Willecke M, Kango-Singh M, Nolo R, Hyun E, Tao C, Jafar-Nejad H, Halder G 2006. The tumour-suppressor genes NF2/Merlin and Expanded act through Hippo signalling to regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol 8: 27–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamaratoglu F, Gajewski K, Sansores-Garcia L, Morrison C, Tao C, Halder G 2009. The Hippo tumor-suppressor pathway regulates apical-domain size in parallel to tissue growth. J Cell Sci 122: 2351–2359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgins GM, Anderson RM 1931. Experimental pathology of the liver, I: Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol (Chic) 12: 186–202 [Google Scholar]
- Jakubowski A, Ambrose C, Parr M, Lincecum JM, Wang MZ, Zheng TS, Browning B, Michaelson JS, Baetscher M, Wang B, et al. 2005. TWEAK induces liver progenitor cell proliferation. J Clin Invest 115: 2330–2340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jelnes P, Santoni-Rugiu E, Rasmussen M, Friis SL, Nielsen JH, Tygstrup N, Bisgaard HC 2007. Remarkable heterogeneity displayed by oval cells in rat and mouse models of stem cell-mediated liver regeneration. Hepatology 45: 1462–1470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jhappan C, Stahle C, Harkins RN, Fausto N, Smith GH, Merlino GT 1990. TGFα overexpression in transgenic mice induces liver neoplasia and abnormal development of the mammary gland and pancreas. Cell 61: 1137–1146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalamarides M, Niwa-Kawakita M, Leblois H, Abramowski V, Perricaudet M, Janin A, Thomas G, Gutmann DH, Giovannini M 2002. Nf2 gene inactivation in arachnoidal cells is rate-limiting for meningioma development in the mouse. Genes Dev 16: 1060–1065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiguchi K, Carbajal S, Chan K, Beltran L, Ruffino L, Shen J, Matsumoto T, Yoshimi N, DiGiovanni J 2001. Constitutive expression of ErbB-2 in gallbladder epithelium results in development of adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 61: 6971–6976 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kofman AV, Morgan G, Kirschenbaum A, Osbeck J, Hussain M, Swenson S, Theise ND 2005. Dose- and time-dependent oval cell reaction in acetaminophen-induced murine liver injury. Hepatology 41: 1252–1261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komuta M, Spee B, Vander Borght S, De Vos R, Verslype C, Aerts R, Yano H, Suzuki T, Matsuda M, Fujii H, et al. 2008. Clinicopathological study on cholangiolocellular carcinoma suggesting hepatic progenitor cell origin. Hepatology 47: 1544–1556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuhn R, Schwenk F, Aguet M, Rajewsky K 1995. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science 269: 1427–1429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuwahara R, Kofman AV, Landis CS, Swenson ES, Barendswaard E, Theise ND 2008. The hepatic stem cell niche: Identification by label-retaining cell assay. Hepatology 47: 1994–2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laconi E, Oren R, Mukhopadhyay DK, Hurston E, Laconi S, Pani P, Dabeva MD, Shafritz DA 1998. Long-term, near-total liver replacement by transplantation of isolated hepatocytes in rats treated with retrorsine. Am J Pathol 153: 319–329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lallemand D, Curto M, Saotome I, Giovannini M, McClatchey AI 2003. NF2 deficiency promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis by destabilizing adherens junctions. Genes Dev 17: 1090–1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lallemand D, Manent J, Couvelard A, Watilliaux A, Siena M, Chareyre F, Lampin A, Niwa-Kawakita M, Kalamarides M, Giovannini M 2009. Merlin regulates transmembrane receptor accumulation and signaling at the plasma membrane in primary mouse Schwann cells and in human schwannomas. Oncogene 28: 854–865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsson J, Ohishi M, Garrison B, Aspling M, Janzen V, Adams GB, Curto M, McClatchey AI, Schipani E, Scadden DT 2008. Nf2/merlin regulates hematopoietic stem cell behavior by altering microenvironmental architecture. Cell Stem Cell 3: 221–227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JH, Rim HJ, Sell S 1997. Heterogeneity of the ‘oval-cell’ response in the hamster liver during cholangiocarcinogenesis following Clonorchis sinensis infection and dimethylnitrosamine treatment. J Hepatol 26: 1313–1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JS, Heo J, Libbrecht L, Chu IS, Kaposi-Novak P, Calvisi DF, Mikaelyan A, Roberts LR, Demetris AJ, Sun Z, et al. 2006. A novel prognostic subtype of human hepatocellular carcinoma derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Nat Med 12: 410–416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J 2003. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 362: 1907–1917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu L, Li Y, Kim SM, Bossuyt W, Liu P, Qiu Q, Wang Y, Halder G, Finegold MJ, Lee JS, et al. 2010. Hippo signaling is a potent in vivo growth and tumor suppressor pathway in the mammalian liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 1437–1442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maitra S, Kulikauskas RM, Gavilan H, Fehon RG 2006. The tumor suppressors Merlin and Expanded function cooperatively to modulate receptor endocytosis and signaling. Curr Biol 16: 702–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH 1999. Improved reporter strain for monitoring Cre recombinase-mediated DNA excisions in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 5037–5042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClatchey AI, Fehon RG 2009. Merlin and the ERM proteins–regulators of receptor distribution and signaling at the cell cortex. Trends Cell Biol 19: 198–206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClatchey AI, Giovannini M 2005. Membrane organization and tumorigenesis—the NF2 tumor suppressor, Merlin. Genes Dev 19: 2265–2277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClatchey AI, Saotome I, Mercer K, Crowley D, Gusella JF, Bronson RT, Jacks T 1998. Mice heterozygous for a mutation at the Nf2 tumor suppressor locus develop a range of highly metastatic tumors. Genes Dev 12: 1121–1133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michalopoulos GK 2007. Liver regeneration. J Cell Physiol 213: 286–300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris ZS, McClatchey AI 2009. Aberrant epithelial morphology and persistent epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in a mouse model of renal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 9767–9772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison H, Sherman LS, Legg J, Banine F, Isacke C, Haipek CA, Gutmann DH, Ponta H, Herrlich P 2001. The NF2 tumor suppressor gene product, merlin, mediates contact inhibition of growth through interactions with CD44. Genes Dev 15: 968–980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murakami H, Sanderson ND, Nagy P, Marino PA, Merlino G, Thorgeirsson SS 1993. Transgenic mouse model for synergistic effects of nuclear oncogenes and growth factors in tumorigenesis: Interaction of c-myc and transforming growth factor α in hepatic oncogenesis. Cancer Res 53: 1719–1723 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagy P, Bisgaard HC, Santoni-Rugiu E, Thorgeirsson SS 1996. In vivo infusion response of rat hepatic ductal (oval) cells after administration of 2-acetylaminofluoreneof growth factors enhances the mitogenic. Hepatology 23: 71–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okada T, Lopez-Lago M, Giancotti FG 2005. Merlin/NF-2 mediates contact inhibition of growth by suppressing recruitment of Rac to the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol 171: 361–371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Omori N, Omori M, Evarts RP, Teramoto T, Miller MJ, Hoang TN, Thorgeirsson SS 1997. Partial cloning of rat CD34 cDNA and expression during stem cell-dependent liver regeneration in the adult rat. Hepatology 26: 720–727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paku S, Schnur J, Nagy P, Thorgeirsson SS 2001. Origin and structural evolution of the early proliferating oval cells in rat liver. Am J Pathol 158: 1313–1323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen BE, Bowen WC, Patrene KD, Mars WM, Sullivan AK, Murase N, Boggs SS, Greenberger JS, Goff JP 1999. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science 284: 1168–1170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ponder KP, Gupta S, Leland F, Darlington G, Finegold M, DeMayo J, Ledley FD, Chowdhury JR, Woo SL 1991. Mouse hepatocytes migrate to liver parenchyma and function indefinitely after intrasplenic transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88: 1217–1221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Postic C, Magnuson MA 2000. DNA excision in liver by an albumin-Cre transgene occurs progressively with age. Genesis 26: 149–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roskams T 2006. Liver stem cells and their implication in hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. Oncogene 25: 3818–3822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roskams TA, Theise ND, Balabaud C, Bhagat G, Bhathal PS, Bioulac-Sage P, Brunt EM, Crawford JM, Crosby HA, Desmet V, et al. 2004. Nomenclature of the finer branches of the biliary tree: Canals, ductules, and ductular reactions in human livers. Hepatology 39: 1739–1745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandgren EP, Quaife CJ, Pinkert CA, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL 1989. Oncogene-induced liver neoplasia in transgenic mice. Oncogene 4: 715–724 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santoni-Rugiu E, Nagy P, Jensen MR, Factor VM, Thorgeirsson SS 1996. Evolution of neoplastic development in the liver of transgenic mice co-expressing c-myc and transforming growth factor-α. Am J Pathol 149: 407–428 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scadden DT 2006. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 441: 1075–1079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sell S 2001. Heterogeneity and plasticity of hepatocyte lineage cells. Hepatology 33: 738–750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sell S, Leffert HL 2008. Liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Oncol 26: 2800–2805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiojiri N 1981. Enzymo- and immunocytochemical analyses of the differentiation of liver cells in the prenatal mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 62: 139–152 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiojiri N, Lemire JM, Fausto N 1991. Cell lineages and oval cell progenitors in rat liver development. Cancer Res 51: 2611–2620 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song H, Mak KK, Topol L, Yun K, Hu J, Garrett L, Chen Y, Park O, Chang J, Simpson RM, et al. 2010. Mammalian Mst1 and Mst2 kinases play essential roles in organ size control and tumor suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 1431–1436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strick-Marchand H, Weiss MC 2002. Inducible differentiation and morphogenesis of bipotential liver cell lines from wild-type mouse embryos. Hepatology 36: 794–804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanabe KK, Lemoine A, Finkelstein DM, Kawasaki H, Fujii T, Chung RT, Lauwers GY, Kulu Y, Muzikansky A, Kuruppu D, et al. 2008. Epidermal growth factor gene functional polymorphism and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. JAMA 299: 53–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanimizu N, Nishikawa M, Saito H, Tsujimura T, Miyajima A 2003. Isolation of hepatoblasts based on the expression of Dlk/Pref-1. J Cell Sci 116: 1775–1786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Theise ND 2006. Gastrointestinal stem cells. III. Emergent themes of liver stem cell biology: Niche, quiescence, self-renewal, and plasticity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G189–G193 doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00041.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Theise ND, Saxena R, Portmann BC, Thung SN, Yee H, Chiriboga L, Kumar A, Crawford JM 1999. The canals of Hering and hepatic stem cells in humans. Hepatology 30: 1425–1433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thorgeirsson SS, Grisham JW 2006. Hematopoietic cells as hepatocyte stem cells: A critical review of the evidence. Hepatology 43: 2–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu X, Kobayashi S, Qiao W, Li C, Xiao C, Radaeva S, Stiles B, Wang RH, Ohara N, Yoshino T, et al. 2006. Induction of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma by liver-specific disruption of Smad4 and Pten in mice. J Clin Invest 116: 1843–1852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita YM, Fuller MT, Jones DL 2005. Signaling in stem cell niches: Lessons from the Drosophila germline. J Cell Sci 118: 665–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoon JH, Gwak GY, Lee HS, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Gores GJ 2004. Enhanced epidermal growth factor receptor activation in human cholangiocarcinoma cells. J Hepatol 41: 808–814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu J, Zheng Y, Dong J, Klusza S, Deng WM, Pan D 2010. Kibra functions as a tumor suppressor protein that regulates Hippo signaling in conjunction with Merlin and Expanded. Dev Cell 18: 288–299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zender L, Spector MS, Xue W, Flemming P, Cordon-Cardo C, Silke J, Fan ST, Luk JM, Wigler M, Hannon GJ, et al. 2006. Identification and validation of oncogenes in liver cancer using an integrative oncogenomic approach. Cell 125: 1253–1267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Smolen GA, Haber DA 2008. Negative regulation of YAP by LATS1 underscores evolutionary conservation of the Drosophila Hippo pathway. Cancer Res 68: 2789–2794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao B, Lei QY, Guan KL 2008. The Hippo–YAP pathway: New connections between regulation of organ size and cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 638–646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou D, Conrad C, Xia F, Park JS, Payer B, Yin Y, Lauwers GY, Thasler W, Lee JT, Avruch J, et al. 2009. Mst1 and Mst2 maintain hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene. Cancer Cell 16: 425–438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]