Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mucosal Immunol. 2010 Jun 16;3(5):475–486. doi: 10.1038/mi.2010.31

Mucosal Delivery of Human Papillomavirus Pseudovirus-Encapsidated Plasmids Improves Potency of DNA Vaccination

Barney S Graham 1,*, Rhonda Kines 2,*, Kizzmekia S Corbett 1, John Nicewonger 1, Teresa R Johnson 1, Man Chen 1, Daaimah LaVigne 1, Jeffrey N Roberts 3, Nicolas Cuburu 2, John T Schiller 2, Christopher B Buck 2
PMCID: PMC2924464  NIHMSID: NIHMS206078  PMID: 20555315

Abstract

Mucosal immunization may be important for protection against pathogens whose transmission and pathogenesis target mucosal tissue. The capsid proteins of human papillomavirus (HPV) confer tropism for basal epithelium and can encapsidate DNA during self-assembly to form pseudovirions (PsV). Therefore, we produced mucosal vaccine vectors by HPV PsV-encapsidation of DNA plasmids expressing an experimental antigen derived from the M and M2 proteins of respiratory syncytial virus. Intravaginal (IVag) delivery elicited local and systemic M/M2-specific CD8+ T-cell and antibody responses in mice comparable to a 10,000-fold higher dose of naked DNA. A single HPV PsV IVag immunization primed for M/M2-specific-IgA in nasal and vaginal secretions. Based on light emission and immunofluorescent microscopy, immunization with HPV PsV-encapsidated luciferase- and red fluorescent protein (RFP)-expressing plasmids resulted in transient antigen expression (<5 days) restricted to the vaginal epithelium. HPV PsV encapsidation of plasmid DNA is a novel strategy for mucosal immunization that may provide new vaccine options for selected mucosal pathogens.

Keywords: Mucosal immunity, DNA vaccine, T cell, antibody, gene-based vector, immunization

INTRODUCTION

Vaccination by gene delivery is an important immunization strategy for viral diseases. Expression of viral proteins from the host cell can authentically mimic the native structure and antigenicity of viral proteins and provides a platform for the induction of both humoral and cellular immunity. There are many potential gene-based vectors that can deliver the genes encoding vaccine antigens, and each has a unique set of properties that determine its utility. These include manufacturing feasibility, cost, stability, ease of storage and administration, replication competence, vector-specific toxicity, pre-existing vector immunity in target host, immune competition between vector antigens and vaccine antigen(s), nuclear or cytoplasmic transcription of transgene, tissue tropism, host range, and potential routes of administration. Naked DNA is the simplest platform for gene delivery. It avoids vector-related concerns, is easy to make and temperature-stable. The major detraction of DNA is that it does not efficiently enter cells, and has low potency relative to the number of gene copies per dose. Immunogenicity has been improved by using various formulations, vehicles, and devices that improve gene expression after parenteral administration, but methods to immunize mucosal surfaces have not advanced (1).

Vaccines for some viral pathogens that typically invade mucosal surfaces like human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), herpes simplex virus (HSV), or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have been difficult to develop in part because of the potential need for mucosal immunity. While passively acquired antibody can protect against these types of diseases (2–4), induction of immune responses locally at the site of infection may provide an advantage. Replication competent viral vectors have typically been more immunogenic when delivered to mucosal surfaces than inactivated virus or replication-defective vaccine vectors, but safety concerns involving biodistribution, integration, and virulence complicate their development.

Despite the immunogenicity of replication-defective gene-based vaccine vectors administered parenterally, delivery systems specifically designed for induction of mucosal immunity have been slow to advance. Only recombinant canarypox expressing HIV-1 and rabies virus antigens delivered by multiple mucosal routes, and nasal delivery of replication-defective recombinant adenovirus vector expressing influenza antigen, have advanced to clinical trials (5, 6). Identifying approaches that effectively deliver replication-defective gene-based vaccine vectors to mucosal surfaces would add an important option for development of future vaccines.

Sexually-transmitted human papillomavirus (HPV) types are prototypic mucosal pathogens that infect stratified squamous epithelium, particularly when microtrauma provides access to the basal epithelial layer (7). The papillomavirus major capsid protein, L1, can self-assemble into virus-like particles (VLP) with or without the minor capsid protein, L2 (8–11). HPV L1 VLPs are able to bind and activate dendritic cells in vitro (12–14). Furthermore, parenteral immunization with HPV L1 VLPs induces T cell responses (15), and type-specific neutralizing antibodies, and is the basis for licensed vaccines (16, 17).

HPV capsids can pseudotype the ~8 Kb genome of other papillomaviruses. L1 and L2 produced by Semliki Forest virus (18) or recombinant vaccinia (19) can encapsidate episomal genomes of alternative papillomavirus serotypes. HPV capsids have also been used as a carrier for plasmid DNA by utilizing a cell free system in which VLPs are disassembled and reassembled in the presence of plasmid DNA (20, 21) or by direct interaction of the assembled VLPs with the DNA (22). A more efficient strategy for producing high titer L1/L2 HPV particles encapsidating DNA plasmids in human cell lines (HPV pseudovirions, PsV) involves co-transfecting the L1 and L2 genes on a large plasmid >8 Kb with a smaller plasmid (<8 Kb) expressing the genes of interest. In this setting, the reporter plasmid is preferentially packaged, together with cellular histone proteins, within the self-assembled recombinant capsid (23, 24).

The immunogenicity of antigens expressed from HPV PsV-delivered plasmids has been examined using particles composed of L1 only and produced by the cell-free disassembly/reassembly method (21, 25–28). Parenteral and oral administration of these pseudovirions generated detectable CTL and/or antibody responses to genes expressing HIV-1 Gag, LCMV gp33, and CEA. Recently, a potential strategy for IVag HPV-PsV-mediated gene delivery was described (29, 30). Although the intact cervicovaginal tract was highly resistant to HPV PsV infection, if the epithelium was disrupted physically by cytobrush or chemically with nonoxynol-9 (N9), gene transfer and local reporter protein expression was observed.

In the current study, we explore the immunogenicity of HPV-PsV-encapsidated plasmid DNA expressing a well characterized RSV model antigen delivered to the vaginal epithelium. In particular, we compared the immunogenicity of HPV-PsV delivery of encapsidated DNA to immunization with naked DNA alone. We find that HPV PsV-mediated delivery to vaginal epithelium increases the potency of plasmid DNA for eliciting CD8+ T cell responses, increases the induction of antibody to the DNA-expressed antigen, and targets the epithelium of the vaginal mucosa resulting in a discrete period of antigen exposure. HPV PsV encapsidation facilitates entry of plasmid DNA into host cells to complement the other exceptional qualities of DNA as a gene delivery vehicle, and provides a technology with the potential for mucosal immunization.

METHODS

Design and construction of the M/M2 fusion gene

With dominant CTL epitopes of RSV M and M2 proteins identified in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, respectively, (16, 17), a model antigen incorporating both of these target proteins was designed. A codon-modified (GeneOptimizer by GeneArt, Regensburg, Germany) gene encoding the M protein (NCBI sequence number AAB86677) was connected to a codon-modified gene encoding the M2 protein (NCBI sequence number AAB86660) by glutamine-alanine linker. The resulting fusion gene is termed “M/M2” hereafter.

Construction of DNA plasmid vectors

The RSV M/M2 gene was cloned into plasmid DNA designed for expression in mammalian cells (pVRC8400) using 5′ SalI and 3′ BamHI restriction sites as described (31). Plasmid inserts were sequenced after cloning to verify sequence conservation.

Production of HPV pseudovirions (PsV)

293TT cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, Carlsbad CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis MO). PsV production and Optiprep purification method was previously reported (32) and is also available at http://ccr.cancer.gov/staff/links.asp?profileid=5637. Maps of HPV16 and HPV45 PsV packaging plasmids (p16sheLL and p45sheLL, respectively) and expression vectors for luciferase (pCLucf), M/M2 (pCMMf) and RFP (pCIR), all driven by the CMV promoter, can also be found at this website. Purified PsV was titrated on 293TT cells by flow cytometric assessment of the expression of green fluorescent protein, as described in Buck and Thompson, 2007 (32) and titer is calculated as infectious units per ml (IU/mL).

Western blotting for expression testing

Each lot of M/M2 fusion proteins in pVRC8400 and from HPV16 and HPV45 pseudovirus was tested by Western blotting prior to evaluation in mice. For expression testing, 293T cell lysates in Invitrogen NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Carlsbad, CA) were run on 4–12% Bis Tris gels and probed with goat polyclonal (Maine Biotechnology, Portland, ME) or murine monoclonal primary antibodies and peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-goat or goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA).

Mice and experimental procedures

Female 6–8 week old BALB/c and CB6F1 mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were housed in the NIAID animal care facility under pathogen-freeconditions and maintained on standard rodent chow and watersupplied ad libitum, according to current ACUC approved documents.

Four days prior to IVag (IVag) immunization mice were treated with 3 mg Depo-Provera in 100 μL PBS to thin the epithelium. Five hours prior to immunization the vaginal epithelium was disrupted by treatment with 50 μL of nonoxynol-9 (40% in distilled H20) diluted to final concentration of 4% in 4% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (Sigma-Aldrich #C4888) for viscosity, as previously described (29). The estrous cycle of the mice was synchronized using the Whitten effect (33) prior to Depo-Provera treatment. Mice were immunized IVag with 5×107 IU of HPV PsV-M/M2, HPV PsV-luciferase (empty vector) or naked DNA-M/M2 diluted to a final volume of 20 μL in 4% CMC and introduced with a positive displacement pipette. Intramuscular (IM) inoculations were given in the quadriceps. Four weeks after primary immunization, mice were boosted with a vector comprised of an alternative HPV serotype or challenged intranasally with RSV. Mice that received secondary immunizations were challenged four weeks after boost. Anesthetized mice were challenged with 107 pfu of A2 strain of RSV IN and evaluated as previously reported (34). BAL was performed as previously described in (35) except that 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS was used. Following BAL procedure, nasal wash was performed by inserting endotracheal tube through the incision in the trachea into the nasopharynx. The nasopharynx was then flushed with 0.2 ml PBS + 1% BSA, collecting the wash fluid from the nostrils. Vaginal washes were performed by rinsing the vaginal vault twice with 50 μL of PBS.

Blood Tetramer Staining

250 μL of whole blood was lysed in 1 mL ACK lysing buffer (Quality Biologicals, Gaithersburg, MD) for seven minutes. Samples were washed with 2 mL PBS and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes. Lysing and washing was repeated up to three times until the cell pellet was devoid of visible amounts of red blood cells. After final removal of supernatant, samples were stained according to the protocol for surface and tetramer staining described below.

Surface and tetramer staining of lymphocytes

For all experiments, lungs were harvested from euthanized mice on days 4 and 7 post-infection. Lymphocytes were isolated with Fico-Lite (Atlanta Biologicals, Atlanta GA), and tetramer-stained with KdM282–90 tetramer or DbM187–195 tetramer complexes and antibodies to CD3, CD4 and CD8 as previously described and analyzed by nine-color flow cytometry as previously described (36) using ViViD (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA) staining to exclude dead cells. Flow Jo version 8.7.3 was used to analyze data.

Measurement of M/M2-specific antibody response by kinetic ELISA

RSV M/M2 fusion protein was produced in E. coli by the Protein Expression Laboratory (SAIC, Frederick, MD). M/M2 protein was diluted in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and coated overnight at 4°C on 96-well flat-bottom ELISA plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY) at a concentration of 80 ng/well. Plates were washed four times with wash buffer (0.02% Tween-20 in PBS) using an automated plate washer (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT), and incubated with blocking buffer (2% BSA in PBS) for one hour at 37 °C. 100 μL of diluted test sample and positive control were added to each well in triplicate (two coated wells and one uncoated well). Plates were incubated for one hour at 37 °C, washed and incubated for one hour at 37 °C with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (1:18000), HRP-conjugated goat anti-IgG2a (1:8000) and HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG+IgM (1:20000) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), or HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgA (1:8000) (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL). Plates were washed with wash buffer four times followed by distilled water. 100 μL of Super AquaBlue ELISA substrate (eBioscience) was added to each well and plates were read immediately using a Dynex Technologies microplate reader (Chantilly, VA). The rate of color change in mOD/min was read at a wavelength of 405 nm every 9 s for 5 min with the plates shaken before each measurement. The mean mOD/min reading of duplicate wells was calculated, and the background mOD/min was subtracted from the corresponding well.

Measurement of M/M2-specific IgA and total IgG and IgA in mucosal secretions

M/M2 was coated as described above. For total immunoglobulin (IgG+IgA), anti-kappa + anti-lambda purified antibodies (Southern Biotech) were coated at 0.1μg/well each. For total IgA, 0.1 μg/well of anti-IgA (Southern Biotech) was used. Plates were washed (PBS/Tween 0.05%) once with and blocked for 2 h at room temperature (RT) with 0.5% milk and 0.1% FBS in PBS. After washing twice, samples were diluted 1:10 for M/M2-specific antibody and 1:50 for total immunoglobulin content, in 0.5% milk in PBS and plates were incubated for 2 h at RT. After washing 3 times, secondary antibodies (goat anti-IgG or anti-IgA HRP-conjugated antibodies) (Southern Biotech) diluted in 0.5% milk in PBS were added for 1 h. After washing 3 times, TMB Microwell Peroxidase Substrate System (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) was added for 7 min at RT, stopped with equal volume of 1 N HCL, and absorbance was read at 450 nm.

Measurement of HPV-specific antibody response

HPV16 L1 particles produced in SF9 cells (37) were diluted to a concentration of 4 μg/mL into 1× PBS and 50 μL was added to each well of a 96-well Immulon 2HB flat bottom microtiter plate (Thermo, Pittsburgh, PA). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 hours then washed three times with 1x PBS followed by the addition of 50 μL blocking buffer (0.5% dry milk, 0.1% FBS in 1xPBS) and incubated at 4°C overnight. Plates were washed three times with 1× PBS. Experimental samples and controls were diluted 1:100 in dilution buffer (0.5% dry milk in 1× PBS). 50 μl of diluted samples were added to the plate in duplicate and allowed to incubate for 2.5 hours at RT on a nutator rocker. Plates were washed 5 times with 1× PBS and incubated 1 hour gently rocking at RT with 50 μL peroxidase conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG in dilution buffer (1:5000) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Plates were washed 3 times with 1× PBS and developed in the dark for 45 minutes at RT using ABTS substrate (1 mg/mL) (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Absorbance was read at 405 nm with a reference set on 492 nm on a Polarstar Optima plate reader (BMG Labtech, Cary, NC). Data points represent the mean of the duplicate values minus the mean of the background.

Cytokine detection

Cytokine specific ELISAs were performed on clarified lung supernatants using DuoSet kits from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Levels of IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β were measured using the kit protocol. Concentrations of cytokines in the lung were calculated by linear regression and expressed as pg/mL.

Measurement of luciferase expression in vivo

Mice were inoculated IVag or IM as described above with 2 × 107 IU of HPV PsV encapsidating a plasmid expressing the bioluminescent gene, firefly luciferase (Luc) (Promega) (30) or 50 μg of plasmid DNA-Luc. Empty vector-treated animals received equivalent amounts of an RFP-expressing plasmid, as naked DNA or encapsidated within HPV16. After IM injection in quadriceps, luciferase expression was measured on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 14 using the IVIS 100 (Xenogen). Mice were imaged prior to application of substrate in order to determine if there was any residual background from the previous day’s administration. D-Luciferin Potassium Salt (15mg/mL, Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton MA) diluted in DMEM was delivered IVag (20 μL) or IM (50 μL). Three minutes post-administration of substrate, images were captured at medium binning with a 60 second exposure. Standardized regions of interest were created around the positive signal and photons were measured using Living Image 3.0 software. Data is reported as average radiance and plots were generated using GraphPad Prism v5.0.

Microscopic analysis

Mice were inoculated IVag with HPV16 PsV-encapsidated RFP-expressing plasmid DNA or 50 μg of naked DNA (pCIR). After two days, reproductive tracts were harvested, frozen, and sectioned as previously described (29).

Statistics

Flow cytometry, cytokine, and antibody data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Pair-wise comparisons were made using the Holm-Sidak, Dunn’s method, or Student T-tests. All statistical tests were performed using SigmaStat 3.0 for Windows (Systat Software, San Jose, CA; www.spss.com/sigmastat).

RESULTS

Characteristics of the HPV-encapsidated M/M2-expressing DNA

Genes encoding the M/M2 fusion protein were effectively expressed in 293T cells transduced with HPV-encapsidated plasmids as demonstrated by Western blot (Figure 1a). The standard dose of 5 × 107 IU of HPV PsV-M/M2 contains about 5 ng of reporter plasmid DNA as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis (http://home.ccr.cancer.gov/lco/encapsidateddnaanalysis.htm) (data not shown). Western blot analysis using M- and M2-specific monoclonal antibodies did not detect M/M2 protein contamination in a standard dose of the HPV PsV preparations indicating there was not significant M/M2 protein contamination in the HPV vector preparations (Figure 1b).

Figure 1. M/M2 expression and characterization of HPV PsV particles.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

To confirm the integrity of each vector construct M/M2 expression was tested in vitro in 293 T cells after 24 hours. p8400 VRC CMV/R plasmid was evaluated using the Invitrogen Lipofectamine 2000 (Carlsbad, CA) protocol. Replication-defective recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) and HPV-encapsidated DNA were used at an MOI of 5. Cell lysates in Invitrogen NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Carlsbad, CA) were run on 4–12% Bis Tris gels and stained with a polyclonal RSV primary antibody (Maine Biotechnology, Portland, ME) and peroxidase-conjugated affiniPure Rabbit anti-goat IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA) (a). To determine the extent of HPV particle contamination with M/M2 protein, Western blot analysis was done comparing a single dose of the HPV particles with specified amounts of purified recombinant M/M2 protein. The only difference from the Western blot procedure stated above was the use of murine monoclonal antibodies to M and M2 as the primary and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA) as the secondary label (b). To assess vector-specific immunity induced by the vaccination approach, HPV16-specific IgG was measured by standard ELISA (c). HPV-specific antibodies were induced by a single IVag dose of the vaccine vector, HPV PsV-M/M2, and the empty vector control, HPV PsV-luciferase.

HPV PsV-based induction of RSV-specific T cell responses

BALB/c mice were immunized either IM or IVag with HPV16 PsV encapsidating plasmid DNA expressing a gene that encodes a fusion protein of RSV M and M2 (M/M2). This was followed 4 weeks later by another immunization by the same route with the plasmid expressing M/M2 encapsidated within heterologous HPV45 PsV to circumvent vector-neutralizing antibody responses elicited by the priming dose (Figure 1c). Four weeks after the second immunization, mice were challenged with RSV IN to probe for vaccine-induced priming of T cell responses in the lung. Lung lymphocytes were evaluated on days 4 and 7 post-challenge (gating shown in Figure 2a). Interestingly, IM immunized as well as IVag immunized mice showed evidence of primed T cell responses with about 5% of lung CD8+ T cells specific for KdM282–90 by day 4 and between 40% and 60% by day 7 (Figure 2b). This compares to no detectable tetramer-specific T cell response by day 4 in empty vector-immunized mice and about 10% at day 7 (Figure 2b). Therefore, both IM and IVag immunized mice were primed for RSV-specific memory CD8+ T cell responses that were of greater magnitude and more rapid than in primary RSV infection in which the CD8+ T cell responses typically peak between days 7 and 10.

Figure 2. Tetramer responses.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The gating strategy for T cell analysis by flow cytometry is shown in panel (a). First, lymphocytes were selected by forward and side-scatter. Next, singlets were selected, then dead cells that were ViVid positive were excluded. Next, we selected CD8+CD3+ cells, the excluded CD4+ cells before gating on tetramer-specific responses. KdM282–90–tetramers were conjugated with PE, and DbM187–195–tetramers were conjugated with APC allowing them to be analyzed together in mice with both H-2d and H-2b alleles. We first evaluated BALB/c (H-2d) mice 4 weeks after immunization with 5×107 IU of HPV16-M/M2 IVag or IM. Secondary immunizations of 5×107 pfu HPV45-M/M2 were given at week 4 by the same route. Negative control mice received 5×107 IU HPV-luciferase IVag. All mice were treated with Depo-Provera (4 days) and N-9 (5 hours) prior to IVag immunization. RSV IN challenge occurred at week 8. On days 4 and 7 following challenge with 107 pfu of A2 strain of RSV, mice were euthanized; lungs were harvested, and stained for KdM282–90 tetramer-specific CD8+ T cells. Day 4 (light grey) and 7 (black) post-challenge KdM282–90 tetramer-specific responses were higher in the immunized mice indicating significant priming. ** p≤0.001; *** p≤0.0001 by one-way ANOVA and T-test compared to empty vector-immunized control. N = five mice per group.

HPV PsV induction of RSV- and HPV-specific antibody responses

M/M2-specific antibody was measured by kinetic ELISA in serum prior to challenge and in serum, nasal wash, vaginal wash, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) on day 7 post challenge (Figure 3). Mice immunized IVag had the greatest serum M/M2-specific antibody response which was biased toward IgG2a rather than IgG1 (Figure 3a). Post-challenge, IVag-immunized mice had the greatest boost in antibody response, again strongly IgG2a biased. Mock-immunized mice undergoing primary RSV infection did not have a significant antibody response detected by day 7 post-challenge. Typically in primary infection, antibody is not easily detectable until day 14 and does not plateau until about 6 weeks post-challenge. The antibody detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid had the same pattern as that in serum (Figure 3b), and the nasal wash had only marginally detectable levels of antibody by day 7 post-challenge in any group (Figure 3c). RSV M/M2-specific vaginal wash antibody was only detected in IVag-immunized mice (Figure 3d).

Figure 3. Antibody responses.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Immunization schedule was completed as described for figure 1, and samples were analyzed for IgG1 and IgG2a M/M2-specific antibody responses by kinetic ELISA in serum 3 days prior to challenge and 7 days following challenge (a). Antibody was measured in mucosal secretion 7 days after nasal challenge with RSV. All immunized and empty vector-immunized mice were infected with RSV. Post-challenge IgG1 and IgG2a M/M2-specific antibody responses are shown for bronchoalveolar lavage (b), nasal wash (c) and vaginal washes (d).

NS=p>0.05; * p≤0.01; ** p≤0.001; *** p≤0.0001 by one-way ANOVA and T-test compared to empty vector-immunized control group. N=5 mice per group at each time point.

Cytokine production in lungs post-challenge

Cytokines in the supernatants from ground lungs were measured by EIA on days 4 and 7 post-challenge. Production of cytokines commonly associated with activated CD8+ T cells responding to RSV infection including IFN-γ, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β were much higher in immunized mice at day 4 and by day 7 were reduced to levels less than or equal to those found in empty vector-immunized mice (Figure 4). This suggests vaccination by either the IM or IVag route primed T cells for a response that was both activated and regulated earlier than mice undergoing primary infection. In addition, none of the cytokines associated with Th2 responses including IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 (data not shown) were detectable in lung supernatants indicating the T cell response in lung was composed primarily of Th1 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Figure 4. Cytokine detection.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Immunization schedule was completed as described for figure 1. On days 4 and 7 following challenge, IFN-γ, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β cytokines were detected in lung supernatants by EIA. IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 were below the limit of detection (20 pg/mL). * = p≤0.01 and ** = p≤0.001 by T-test compared to empty vector-immunized control group. N=5 mice per group at each time point from one independent experiment.

HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA induces a different pattern of immune response than naked DNA

Next we asked whether the HPV PsV-encapsidated plasmid could induce a significant immune response after a single immunization and whether IVag-delivered naked DNA was immunogenic. In this experiment H-2b/d hybrid CB6F1/J were used so that T cell responses could be measured by both KdM282–90 and DbM187–195 tetramers. Mice were immunized with a single IVag inoculation and challenged 4 weeks later. Blood tetramer responses for the dominant M282–90 response were detected at a low level 10 days after a single IVag immunization with HPV16 PsV-M/M2 and DNA-M/M2 (data not shown). HPV16 PsV-encapsidated DNA primed for high magnitude M282–90 and M187–195-specific T cell responses. A single dose of 50 μg naked DNA IVag also primed for a strong T cell response in the lung 7 days post-challenge (Figure 5). However, the HPV16 PsV-immunized mice had a more balanced response between the dominant M282–90 and the subdominant M187–195 epitope relative to DNA-primed mice where the epitope response disparity was greater. The ratio of the M282–90 to M187–195-specific tetramer responses for mice immunized with naked DNA, HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA, or empty vector was 12+/−3.5, 4.3+/−0.3, and 4.4+/−0.8, respectively (n=5 per group, p=0. 06). We have previously seen this effect associated with the frequency of FoxP3+ T cell responses (38), and indeed the frequency of FoxP3+ CD4 T cells in the lungs of HPV PsV-primed mice is greater than in DNA-primed mice (data not shown). Another difference in the immune response pattern was that naked DNA-immunized mice did not have any detectable M/M2-specific antibody response in serum prechallenge, while mice immunized with a single dose of HPV16 PsV-encapsidated DNA had detectable antibody (Figure 6a). In contrast to BALB/c mice immunized with two doses of HPV PsV vectors (Figure 3a), the relative induction of M/M2-specific IgG1 and IgG2a after a single dose of HPV PSV M/M2 in the hybrid mice prior to challenge was more balanced, although post-challenge the response was predominantly IgG2a. In samples derived from mice on day 12 post-challenge M/M2-specific antibody was detected in BAL, nasal wash, and vaginal wash only in the HPV16 PsV-immunized mice (Figure 6b-d). RSV-specific nasal wash antibody was detected at significantly higher levels in HPV16 PsV-immunized mice indicating that prior priming of the vaginal mucosa with HPV PsV elicited a RSV-specific recall response in the nasal mucosa post-challenge as well as in vaginal mucosa. In both nasal and vaginal wash fluids post-challenge there was a greater amount of total IgG that correlated with the M/M2 specific responses in those samples (Figure 6). This suggests that IVag immunization resulted in local and systemic immunological events that increased transudation in the vagina and nose after RSV infection of the airway. This did not occur in DNA-primed mice. M/M2-specific IgA was detected in both nasal (Figure 7a) and vaginal wash (Figure 7b) post-challenge in HPV16 PsV-M/M2 immunized mice, but not in mice immunized with naked DNA. Total IgA was similar in samples from both immunized and empty vector-immunized groups, suggesting the M/M2-specific IgA was more likely to be locally produced and not the result of transudation.

Figure 5. Potency of T cell induction by HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

CB6F1/J mice were immunized IVag with 5×107 IU HPV16-PsV-M/M2 or 50 μg naked M/M2 DNA. Negative control mice received 5×107 IU HPV16 PsV-luciferase. All mice were challenged IN with RSV at week 4. DbM187–195 (red) and KdM282–90-specific (blue) CD8+ T cells were detected by tetramer staining in lungs on day 7 post-challenge. * = p≤0.01 and ** = p≤0.001 by one-way ANOVA and T-test compared to empty vector-immunized mice. N=5 mice per group from one independent experiment.

Figure 6. Induction of IgG by HPV-encapsidated DNA.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Following immunization with a single dose of HPV16 PsV-encapsidated M/M2-expressing DNA, naked M/M2-expressing DNA or empty HPV16 PsV capsids M/M2-specific IgG1 and IgG2 levels were evaluated by kinetic ELISA in serum 3 days prior to challenge (a). RSV M/M2-specific IgG isotypes were also measured in BAL (b), nasal washes (c), and vaginal washes (d) on day 12 post-challenge. Total IgG was measured by ELISA in both nasal and vaginal washes (c and d, panels on far right). P values are derived from one-way ANOVA (NS =p>0.05; + ≤0.05; * ≤0.01; ** ≤0.001; *** ≤0.0001). The data represent each individual sample from each animal from one independent experiment.

Figure 7. Induction of IgA by HPV-encapsidated DNA.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Mice immunized with a single dose of HPV16 PsV-encapsidated M/M2-expressing DNA, naked M/M2-expressing DNA, or empty HPV16 PsV capsids were challenged with RSV intranasally. Nasal washes (a) and vaginal washes (b) were evaluated for M/M2-specific IgA or total IgA by ELISA on day 12 post-challenge. P values are derived from one-way ANOVA (NS= p>0.05; + ≤0.05; * ≤0.01; ** ≤0.001). N=5 mice per group from a single independent experiment.

HPV PsV encapsidation improves the potency of DNA immunization

Next we asked how the relative potency of a single immunization with HPV vector compared to naked DNA immunization. It is estimated that in a standard dose of HPV PsV particles there is about 5 ng of plasmid DNA. Therefore, BALB/c mice were immunized once IVag with 5 ng, 500 ng, or 50 μg (50,000 ng) of naked DNA or 5×107 IU HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA particles. A single dose of both HPV16 and HPV45 PsV vectors were evaluated independently. Controls included a empty vector-immunized group and a group that received 1 μg of M/M2 protein in combination with a nonexpressing plasmid. This group was included to account for the possibility that some M/M2 protein produced during transfection might be contaminating the HPV particle preparations, although WB analysis could not detect M/M2 present in a single dose of vaccine (Figure 1b). Mice were challenged with RSV IN 4 weeks after immunization and KdM282–90 tetramer-specific CD8+ T cell responses were measured in lung on day 7. The HPV16 and HPV45 PsV-immunized mice were the only ones with evidence of significant RSV-specific T cell priming (Figure 8a). This pattern of response was also seen in measurements of serum antibody, with only HPV PsV-immunized mice having detectable levels of antibody prechallenge (Figure 8b). By day 7 post challenge (Figure 8c) it is clear that HPV PsV vector primed for a significantly greater antibody response. These data suggest that HPV PsV encapsidation of plasmids improved the efficiency of delivery, expression, and immunogenicity of the vaccine antigen in target cells.

Figure 8. HPV PsV encapsidation improves delivery of plasmid DNA.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

BALB/c mice were immunized once IVag with a single 5×107 IU dose of HPV16 PsV-M/M2, 5×107 IU HPV45 PsV-M/M2, 5 ng 500 ng, or 50 μg naked M/M2 DNA, or 1μg M/M2 purified protein. Negative control mice received 5×107 IU HPV-luciferase IVag. All mice were challenged IN with RSV at week 4. Seven days after challenge, M and M2-specific CD8+ T cells in lung were measured by tetramer staining (a) and M/M2-specific IgG1 and IgG2 serum responses were measured by kinetic ELISA prechallenge (b) and post-challenge (c). P values represent one-way ANOVA and selected comparisons by T-test (+ = p≤0.05; * ≤0.01; **** ≤0.00001). N=5 mice per group for each postchallenge timepoint from one independent experiment.

Intravaginal HPV delivery of plasmids results in high levels of self-limited antigen expression

To better understand how the magnitude and duration of antigen expression was affected by the delivery approach, plasmids were constructed to express firefly luciferase, and in vivo light emission was measured after IM and IVag delivery of HPV PsV or naked DNA. Because signal is lost within a few hours of substrate administration, we were able to image the same mice for each of the daily time points. Luciferase expression from IVag-administered HPV PsV was significantly higher than that observed with naked DNA delivery at days 1 and 2 (p < 0.001 by ANOVA) (Figure 9). Expression from HPV PsV IVag delivery peaked within two days and returned to background levels by day seven. Expression from naked DNA was much lower, despite delivery of ~10,000-fold more copies of the same plasmid, peaking on day one and returning to near background levels by day three. Although expression from IVag naked DNA was relatively low, it was significantly above background (p < .05 by Dunns Method). The initial strong burst of antigen after IVag instillation of HPV PsV could account for the differences observed in the immunological responses between HPV PsV and naked DNA.

Figure 9. Temporal expression of HPV-PsV-delivered antigen.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Mice were inoculated IVag (□, △) or IM (■, ▲) with either pClucF (firefly luciferase) plasmid DNA (■, □) or HPV16 pseudovirions-encapsidated pClucF (△, ▲). Negative control mice received a 1:1 combination of naked and PsV-encapsidated plasmid expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) IVag,○ IM, ●). Luciferin substrate (15 mg/ml) was administered IVag (20 μl) or IM (50 μl) and after three minutes mice were imaged for bioluminescence in an IVIS 100 for 60s with medium binning. The data was quantified as the average radiance within a standardized region of interest using Living Image software. Data represent 5 mice per group and are representative of two independent experiments (a). In parallel experiments, mice were inoculated with an RFP-expressing plasmid or HPV PsV encapsidating the same plasmids. After two days genital tracts were removed and sectioned transversely to define the location of RFP expression. Delivery by HPV16 PsV encapsidation resulted in a higher frequency of transduction with RFP-expression detected in every tissue section examined (between 50–150 infectious events per section) (b), while cells transduced by delivery of naked DNA plasmid were rare; only two infected cells in all sections from the 4 mice examined (c).

Mice inoculated IM with naked DNA exhibited a higher level of luciferase expression than those inoculated with HPV PsV luciferase-expressing plasmids during the first 7 days after injection (p<0.001 by ANOVA). Luciferase expression after IM delivery of naked DNA peaked during the first week and then plateaued at about 50% of peak. In contrast, IM delivered HPV PsV resulted in delayed expression that did not reach a similar level of expression compared to naked DNA until about day 7. Surprisingly, luciferase expression continued to slowly increase over subsequent weeks in animals receiving HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA IM.

To better understand the basis for improved immune responses from IVag delivery of HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA, naked DNA plasmids expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) or the same plasmid encapsidated in HPV PsV were intravaginally instilled into mice. On day 2, genital tracts were removed, frozen, and sectioned for evaluation of RFP signal as a readout for gene transduction by fluorescent microscopy. RFP-positive epithelial cells were easily identified in the HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA recipients (Figure 9b). Very rare cells could be identified in the naked DNA recipients. However, the morphology of RFP-positive cells suggests they are also epithelial cells (Figure 9c). Nevertheless, it is possible that other cells such as mobile antigen presenting cells had already left the tissue. These data are consistent with the light emission data, and suggest that the higher magnitude of gene delivery to and antigen expression in keratinocytes is a major factor in the immunogenicity of HPV PsV delivery of DNA.

DISCUSSION

Mucosal immunization may be important for protection against viral pathogens like HIV, HSV, or RSV. While parenteral immunization can elicit protective immune responses in animal models of these virus infections, effective immunization of humans has been difficult. Each of these pathogens has multiple features that make them difficult vaccine targets (39), but one feature they share in common is that transmission usually occurs across a mucosal surface. Mucosal immunization against viruses has traditionally been accomplished by using live attenuated viruses. However, for viruses like HIV or HSV that can cause latent or persistent infection, or RSV that infects neonatal airways, the use of replication-competent virus presents a number of safety concerns. Gene-based vector delivery of vaccine antigens affords an option for eliciting immune responses against authentic antigenic structures while avoiding some of the liabilities of the native viral pathogen. However, there have been relatively few options for direct mucosal immunization with gene-based vaccine vectors described, and they have primarily been replication-competent vectors based on adenovirus (40), picornavirus (41), rhinovirus (42), or paramyxovirus (43, 44). Replication-defective poxvirus and adenovirus vectors have been delivered mucosally to humans, but with limited success (5, 6). Here we describe the mucosal delivery of DNA facilitated by HPV PsV encapsidation. IVag delivery of HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA induces both T cell and antibody responses to the antigen encoded by the plasmid. HPV PsV encapsidation appears to increase the relative potency of the DNA vaccine based on gene copies delivered, and induces stronger antibody responses than DNA alone.

IVag delivery was more immunogenic than IM. Typically replication-defective gene-based vectors have been less potent when delivered mucosally than when delivered parenterally. The mucosal advantage observed in this report may be due to the natural tropism of HPVs for basal epithelium(7), but may also reflect access to other antigen presenting cells in the mucosa that are not present in the muscle. Alternatively, there may be selected cells in the mucosa that can recognize the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in HPV resulting in TLR activation and an adjuvant-like effect that does not happen in the muscle environment. The higher ratio of IgG1 to IgG2a and the reduced ratio of KdM282–90 to DbM187–195 tetramer responses in the IM immunized group compared to the IVag immunized group suggests that a different pattern of CD4 T cell response was elicited by the two routes. Higher IgG1 is associated with IL-4 production from Th2 responses, and a lower disparity in the epitope hierarchy is associated with Treg responses (38), and both suggest differences in antigen presentation occurred between IM and IVag administered particles.

Delivery of naked DNA to the disrupted epithelium was also immunogenic, although the copy number of the gene encoding the M/M2 antigen was ~10,000-fold higher in the naked DNA dose than in a dose of HPV-encapsidated plasmids. This and recent in vivo studies showing improved potency of DNA immunization by electroporation(45) suggests that the major limitation for DNA vaccination is at the level of delivery into cells and not at one of the many downstream points ultimately required for expression of the vaccine antigen.

IVag delivery of naked DNA was unable to elicit M/M2-specific antibody responses. In contrast, HPV-encapsidated DNA delivered IVag induced antibody responses in the vaginal epithelium and primed for antibody responses in the upper airway. This could involve delivery to alternative targets cells and consequently different antigen processing and presentation pathways, a different pattern of TLR stimulation, or a different threshold of antigen expression needed for T cell vs. antibody induction.

We asked whether the magnitude and kinetics of vaccine antigen availability could explain the distinct properties in the immune response elicited by DNA delivered IVag or IM, either encapsidated with HPV PsV or not. Using luciferase expression as a surrogate for vaccine antigen expression (46), we found that IVag delivery of DNA by HPV PsV resulted in significantly higher antigen production, but for a brief circumscribed period of time. This transient expression pattern may be attributed to the tropism of HPV targeting basal epithelial cells, which would be expected to differentiate and be sloughed off into the vaginal lumen over the course of about five days. Based on the light emission and RFP expression data, we favor the explanation that IVag HPV PsV improves gene delivery and the magnitude of antigen expression and that antibody is more dose dependent than T cell responses.

IM delivery of the HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA had weak expression in the early days after inoculation. Delivery of naked DNA resulted in better expression when delivered IM than mucosally and luciferase expression was prolonged. However, the level of luciferase expression was much lower than with HPV PsV-encapsidated DNA, and the delayed clearance suggested different target cells were transduced. IVag expressed antigen appears to be immediately available in basal epithelial cells, and based on its rapid clearance, is probably cross-presented by dendritic cells in the mucosa. IM delivered HPV-encapsidated plasmid results in slower more cumulative production of antigen, but the target cell for infection and method of antigen presentation are unclear.

The demonstration of IgA in both nasal and vaginal wash indicates that HPV PsV delivery induced a mucosal antibody response to the antigen encoded by the encapsidated plasmid, and that the vaginal mucosa serves as a local inductive site for the response. In addition to direct induction of IgA in vaginal mucosa there was evidence that IgA responses in nasal secretions were primed by IVag immunization suggesting mobility of the adaptive mucosal response. It was also notable that total IgG was increased in nasal and vaginal washes post-challenge. The evidence of increase transudation at the site of infection and at the site of original immunization suggests that immune effectors were activated at both sites during infection of the airway, and that HPV PsV vector immunization of the vaginal mucosa can induce locally persistent adaptive responses.

HPV PsV-delivered IVag primes for a similar pattern of cytokine response in lung after RSV challenge as other parenterally administered gene-based vectors with no evidence of Th2 cytokines. For RSV in particular and for viral vaccines in general, it is desirable to avoid the induction of Th2 responses. The cells and effector molecules associated with Th2 responses can lead to diminished CD8 T cell function, altered antibody isotypes, and pathology resembling allergic inflammation (47, 48). This pattern of response has been associated with reduced efficacy and vaccine-induced immunopathology (49).

The major limitation of this approach is that disruption of the vaginal epithelium is required for HPV to access its target cells. Nonoxynol-9 (N9) is a licensed, over the counter, spermicide that was used to disrupt the epithelium. It may be clinically acceptable for limited use prior to a vaccination, although repeated use would be unacceptable because of the increased susceptibility to HIV-1 and perhaps other sexually transmitted diseases (50). In this test-of-concept study, mice were also pretreated with Depo-Provera to thin the vaginal epithelium prior to N9 treatment, and this would not be a clinically acceptable component of a vaccination regimen. Therefore, advancing this concept will require the development of a clinically acceptable approach for providing HPV transient access to its target cells in the basal epithelium.

We have described a vaccine delivery approach using HPV PsV-encapsidated plasmid DNA that results in significant levels of mucosal antigen expression for a brief period of time and is likely to be inducing immune responses primarily through cross-presentation of transduced vaginal epithelium. It has the capacity to induce immunity not only against antigens expressed from the plasmid, but may also provide immunity against the HPV serotype used for the delivery. This is a novel vaccine approach that merits additional investigation especially for pathogens that infect across mucosal surfaces, and particularly for sexually transmitted diseases in women.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by intramural funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Cancer Institute.

References

  • 1.Ledgerwood JE, Graham BS. DNA Vaccines: A safe and efficient platform technology for responding to emerging infectious diseases. Human Vaccines. [Commentary] 2009 Sep;5(9):623–6. doi: 10.4161/hv.8627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brown ZA, Wald A, Morrow RA, Selke S, Zeh J, Corey L. Effect of serologic status and cesarean delivery on transmission rates of herpes simplex virus from mother to infant. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):203–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Groothuis JR, Simoes EA, Levin MJ, Hall CB, Long CE, Rodriguez WJ, et al. Prophylactic administration of respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin to high-risk infants and young children. The Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immune Globulin Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993 Nov 18;329(21):1524–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199311183292102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mascola JR, Stiegler G, VanCott TC, Katinger H, Carpenter CB, Hanson CE, et al. Protection of macaques against vaginal transmission of a pathogenic HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus by passive infusion of neutralizing antibodies. Nat Med. 2000 Feb;6(2):207–10. doi: 10.1038/72318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Van Kampen KR, Shi Z, Gao P, Zhang J, Foster KW, Chen DT, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of adenovirus-vectored nasal and epicutaneous influenza vaccines in humans. Vaccine. 2005 Jan 11;23(8):1029–36. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wright PF, Mestecky J, McElrath MJ, Keefer MC, Gorse GJ, Goepfert PA, et al. Comparison of systemic and mucosal delivery of 2 canarypox virus vaccines expressing either HIV-1 genes or the gene for rabies virus G protein. J Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 1;189(7):1221–31. doi: 10.1086/382088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines. J Clin Invest. 2006 May;116(5):1167–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI28607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kirnbauer R, Booy F, Cheng N, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Papillomavirus L1 major capsid protein self-assembles into virus-like particles that are highly immunogenic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 15;89(24):12180–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.12180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hagensee ME, Yaegashi N, Galloway DA. Self-assembly of human papillomavirus type 1 capsids by expression of the L1 protein alone or by coexpression of the L1 and L2 capsid proteins. J Virol. 1993 Jan;67(1):315–22. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.1.315-322.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rose RC, Bonnez W, Reichman RC, Garcea RL. Expression of human papillomavirus type 11 L1 protein in insect cells: in vivo and in vitro assembly of viruslike particles. J Virol. 1993 Apr;67(4):1936–44. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.4.1936-1944.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kirnbauer R, Taub J, Greenstone H, Roden R, Durst M, Gissmann L, et al. Efficient self-assembly of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 and L1-L2 into virus-like particles. J Virol. 1993 Dec;67(12):6929–36. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.12.6929-6936.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bontkes HJ, Ruizendaal JJ, Kramer D, Meijer CJ, Hooijberg E. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are present in cervical carcinoma and become activated by human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):897–901. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lenz P, Day PM, Pang YY, Frye SA, Jensen PN, Lowy DR, et al. Papillomavirus-like particles induce acute activation of dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2001 May 1;166(9):5346–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.9.5346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rudolf MP, Fausch SC, Da Silva DM, Kast WM. Human dendritic cells are activated by chimeric human papillomavirus type-16 virus-like particles and induce epitope-specific human T cell responses in vitro. J Immunol. 2001 May 15;166(10):5917–24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.10.5917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pinto LA, Castle PE, Roden RB, Harro CD, Lowy DR, Schiller JT, et al. HPV-16 L1 VLP vaccine elicits a broad-spectrum of cytokine responses in whole blood. Vaccine. 2005 May 20;23(27):3555–64. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, Ferris DG, Jenkins D, Schuind A, et al. Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 Nov 13–19;364(9447):1757–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17398-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Villa LL, Costa RL, Petta CA, Andrade RP, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, et al. Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005 May;6(5):271–8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70101-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roden RB, Greenstone HL, Kirnbauer R, Booy FP, Jessie J, Lowy DR, et al. In vitro generation and type-specific neutralization of a human papillomavirus type 16 virion pseudotype. J Virol. 1996 Sep;70(9):5875–83. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.9.5875-5883.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Unckell F, Streeck RE, Sapp M. Generation and neutralization of pseudovirions of human papillomavirus type 33. J Virol. 1997 Apr;71(4):2934–9. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.4.2934-2939.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kawana K, Yoshikawa H, Taketani Y, Yoshiike K, Kanda T. In vitro construction of pseudovirions of human papillomavirus type 16: incorporation of plasmid DNA into reassembled L1/L2 capsids. J Virol. 1998 Dec;72(12):10298–300. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.12.10298-10300.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Touze A, Coursaget P. In vitro gene transfer using human papillomavirus-like particles. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Mar 1;26(5):1317–23. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.5.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Combita AL, Touze A, Bousarghin L, Sizaret PY, Munoz N, Coursaget P. Gene transfer using human papillomavirus pseudovirions varies according to virus genotype and requires cell surface heparan sulfate. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Oct 16;204(1):183–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Buck CB, Pastrana DV, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Efficient intracellular assembly of papillomaviral vectors. J Virol. 2004 Jan;78(2):751–7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.2.751-757.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Buck CB, Thompson CD, Pang YY, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Maturation of papillomavirus capsids. J Virol. 2005 Mar;79(5):2839–46. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.5.2839-2846.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang Y, Fayad R, Smock A, Ullrich AM, Qiao L. Induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses against human carcinoembryonic antigen by an oral vaccine. Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 1;65(15):6990–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shi W, Liu J, Huang Y, Qiao L. Papillomavirus pseudovirus: a novel vaccine to induce mucosal and systemic cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses. J Virol. 2001 Nov;75(21):10139–48. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10139-10148.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang H, Fayad R, Wang X, Quinn D, Qiao L. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gag-specific mucosal immunity after oral immunization with papillomavirus pseudoviruses encoding gag. J Virol. 2004 Oct;78(19):10249–57. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10249-10257.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang H, Huang Y, Fayad R, Spear GT, Qiao L. Induction of mucosal and systemic neutralizing antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by oral immunization with bovine Papillomavirus-HIV-1 gp41 chimeric virus-like particles. J Virol. 2004 Aug;78(15):8342–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.15.8342-8348.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roberts JN, Buck CB, Thompson CD, Kines R, Bernardo M, Choyke PL, et al. Genital transmission of HPV in a mouse model is potentiated by nonoxynol-9 and inhibited by carrageenan. Nat Med. 2007 Jul;13(7):857–61. doi: 10.1038/nm1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Johnson KM, Kines RC, Roberts JN, Lowy DR, Schiller JT, Day PM. Role of heparan sulfate in attachment to and infection of the murine female genital tract by human papillomavirus. J Virol. 2009 Mar;83(5):2067–74. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02190-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barouch DH, Yang ZY, Kong WP, Korioth-Schmitz B, Sumida SM, Truitt DM, et al. A human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 regulatory element enhances the immunogenicity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA vaccines in mice and nonhuman primates. J Virol. 2005 Jul;79(14):8828–34. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.14.8828-8834.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Buck CB, Thompson CD. Production of papillomavirus-based gene transfer vectors. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2007 Dec;Chapter 26(Unit 26):1. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb2601s37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dalal SJ, Estep JS, Valentin-Bon IE, Jerse AE. Standardization of the Whitten Effect to induce susceptibility to Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female mice. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2001 Mar;40(2):13–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Graham BS, Perkins MD, Wright PF, Karzon DT. Primary respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. J Med Virol. 1988 Oct;26(2):153–62. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890260207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Johnson TR, Johnson JE, Roberts SR, Wertz GW, Parker RA, Graham BS. Priming with secreted glycoprotein G of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) augments interleukin-5 production and tissue eosinophilia after RSV challenge. J Virol. 1998 Apr;72(4):2871–80. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.4.2871-2880.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rutigliano JA, Ruckwardt TJ, Martin JE, Graham BS. Relative dominance of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses in an F1 hybrid mouse model of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Virology. 2007 Jun 5;362(2):314–9. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kirnbauer R, Chandrachud LM, O’Neil BW, Wagner ER, Grindlay GJ, Armstrong A, et al. Virus-like particles of bovine papillomavirus type 4 in prophylactic and therapeutic immunization. Virology. 1996 May 1;219(1):37–44. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ruckwardt TJ, Bonaparte KL, Nason MC, Graham BS. Regulatory T cells promote early influx of CD8+ T cells in the lungs of respiratory syncytial virus-infected mice and diminish immunodominance disparities. J Virol. 2009 Apr;83(7):3019–28. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00036-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Graham BS, Walker C. Meeting the Challenge of Vaccine Design to Control HIV and Other DIfficult Viruses. In: Kaufmann SHE, Rouse B, Sacks D, editors. Immunology of Infectious Diseases. Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 2010. (submitted) [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lubeck MD, Natuk R, Myagkikh M, Kalyan N, Aldrich K, Sinangil F, et al. Long-term protection of chimpanzees against high-dose HIV-1 challenge induced by immunization. Nat Med. 1997 Jun;3(6):651–8. doi: 10.1038/nm0697-651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Andino R, Silvera D, Suggett SD, Achacoso PL, Miller CJ, Baltimore D, et al. Engineering poliovirus as a vaccine vector for the expression of diverse antigens. Science. 1994 Sep 2;265(5177):1448–51. doi: 10.1126/science.8073288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Arnold GF, Resnick DA, Smith AD, Geisler SC, Holmes AK, Arnold E. Chimeric rhinoviruses as tools for vaccine development and characterization of protein epitopes. Intervirology. 1996;39(1–2):72–8. doi: 10.1159/000150477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Buchholz UJ, Granzow H, Schuldt K, Whitehead SS, Murphy BR, Collins PL. Chimeric bovine respiratory syncytial virus with glycoprotein gene substitutions from human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV): effects on host range and evaluation as a live-attenuated HRSV vaccine. J Virol. 2000 Feb;74(3):1187–99. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.3.1187-1199.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bukreyev A, Huang Z, Yang L, Elankumaran S, St Claire M, Murphy BR, et al. Recombinant newcastle disease virus expressing a foreign viral antigen is attenuated and highly immunogenic in primates. J Virol. 2005 Nov;79(21):13275–84. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.21.13275-13284.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Widera G, Austin M, Rabussay D, Goldbeck C, Barnett SW, Chen M, et al. Increased DNA vaccine delivery and immunogenicity by electroporation in vivo. J Immunol. 2000 May 1;164(9):4635–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Geiben-Lynn R, Greenland JR, Frimpong-Boateng K, Letvin NL. Kinetics of recombinant adenovirus type 5, vaccinia virus, modified vaccinia ankara virus, and DNA antigen expression in vivo and the induction of memory T-lymphocyte responses. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Apr;15(4):691–6. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00418-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tang YW, Graham BS. Anti-IL-4 treatment at immunization modulates cytokine expression, reduces illness, and increases cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in mice challenged with respiratory syncytial virus. J Clin Invest. 1994 Nov;94(5):1953–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI117546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aung S, Tang YW, Graham BS. Interleukin-4 diminishes CD8(+) respiratory syncytial virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity in vivo. J Virol. 1999 Nov;73(11):8944–9. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.11.8944-8949.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Delgado MF, Coviello S, Monsalvo AC, Melendi GA, Hernandez JZ, Batalle JP, et al. Lack of antibody affinity maturation due to poor Toll-like receptor stimulation leads to enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease. Nat Med. 2009 Jan;15(1):34–41. doi: 10.1038/nm.1894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mesquita PM, Cheshenko N, Wilson SS, Mhatre M, Guzman E, Fakioglu E, et al. Disruption of tight junctions by cellulose sulfate facilitates HIV infection: model of microbicide safety. J Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 15;200(4):599–608. doi: 10.1086/600867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES