Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2010 May 19;40(1):4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.05.012

Neurodegenerative disorders: insights from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Maria Dimitriadi 1, Anne C Hart 1
PMCID: PMC2926245  NIHMSID: NIHMS211617  PMID: 20493260

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases impose a burden on society, yet for the most part, the mechanisms underlying neuronal dysfunction and death in these disorders remain unclear despite the identification of relevant disease genes. Given the molecular conservation in neuronal signaling pathways across vertebrate and invertebrate species, many researchers have turned to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to identify the mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative disease pathology. C. elegans can be engineered to express human proteins associated with neurodegeneration; additionally, the function of C. elegans orthologs of human neurodegenerative disease genes can be dissected. Herein, we examine major C. elegans neurodegeneration models that recapitulate many aspects of human neurodegenerative disease and we survey the screens that have identified modifier genes. This review highlights how the C. elegans community has used this versatile organism to model several aspects of human neurodegeneration and how these studies have contributed to our understanding of human disease.

Keywords: neurodegeneration, C. elegans, protein aggregation, toxicity, Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Introduction

As average longevity increases, neurodegenerative diseases become more prevalent and problematic, especially as treatments for these diseases are unavailable or ineffective. In many cases, the identity of genes that predispose or cause neurodegenerative disease is clear: huntingtin in Huntington’s disease, β-amyloid and tau in Alzheimer’s disease, and α-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. While these discoveries have led to improvements in diagnosis, the molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration remain poorly understood. Many neurodegenerative disease genes are broadly expressed throughout the body, yet, in many cases, specific neural tissues are affected which suggests neuron specific roles for disease proteins. In addition, a hallmark of many age-associated neurodegenerative disorders is aberrant accumulation or aggregation of the disease protein and other proteins. Despite a plethora of studies, it is still not clear if the accumulation of mutant huntingtin, β-amyloid, tau, or α-synuclein in their respective diseases is a critical factor leading to neuronal dysfunction and death. Some studies suggest that large protein aggregates are protective and that soluble, mis-folded protein monomers or oligomers are the active toxic agent. Due to the complexity of the vertebrate brain and the fact that mammalian model organisms have their own limitations (e.g. cost, laborious transgenesis, long life spans), invertebrate models including Caenorhabditis elegans have been used in the past decade to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration.

C. elegans is a free-living nematode of ~1 mm in length with a short generation cycle (~3 days) and lifespan (~3 weeks), and a transparent body that allows for the visualization of all cell types at all stages of development (Brenner, 1974). Neuronal cell death and protein inclusions can easily be detected and quantified using optical techniques. Additionally, C. elegans have a simple nervous system of 302 neurons in the adult hermaphrodite, in which each neuron has a unique position and identity that is reproducible from animal to animal (White et al., 1986). Furthermore, the synaptic and gap connections between these neurons are also reproducible based on nervous system reconstruction at the electron microscope level of analysis. Major neurotransmitter systems are conserved in C. elegans contributing to the appeal of the nematode for neuroscientists. At least 42% of human disease related genes have a C. elegans ortholog (Culetto and Sattelle, 2000), suggesting that most biochemical pathways are conserved across evolution. Arguably, the most attractive characteristic of the nematode is its suitability for experimental approaches that are not possible in mammalian models. For example, unbiased forward genetic screens using chemical mutagenesis can reveal genes integral to the biological process of interest. This approach has been used to elucidate the genetic and molecular interactions of various genes/pathways including synaptic vesicle trafficking, apoptosis, and mRNA translational regulation. In addition, reverse genetic analyses or screens can be undertaken by feeding C. elegans bacteria expressing double-stranded RNA (RNA interference, RNAi), which leads to almost global knockdown of target gene expression. While neurons are less sensitive to RNAi by bacterial feeding than some other tissues, this powerful strategy nevertheless has been used in numerous screens described below to identify modifier genes. For these reasons, C. elegans has emerged as an attractive and powerful in vivo model system for studying pathological mechanisms in several major neurodegenerative disorders.

In this article, we review how the C. elegans community has used the nematode to model human neurodegenerative disease and how these studies have contributed to our current understanding thereof. Due to space limitations, some C. elegans models for human disease are not reviewed herein (Park and Li, 2008; Sym et al., 2000). In addition, C. elegans studies addressing the normal function of human neurodegenerative disease orthologs or studies of C. elegans neurodegeneration that is not a direct model of human diseases are not reviewed here (Artal-Sanz and Tavernarakis, 2005; Chalfie and Wolinsky, 1990; Driscoll, 1992; Kraemer and Schellenberg, 2007a; Levitan et al., 1996; Springer et al., 2005). In Table 1, the genes pertinent to human neurodegenerative diseases discussed in this article are listed along with their C. elegans orthologs.

Table 1.

Likely C. elegans orthologs of genes associated with neurodegenerative disorders

Human genes C. elegans genes
huntingtin (Htt) n/a
amyloid precursor protein (APP) apl-1
β-secretase (BACE1) n/a
presenilin-1 & 2 (PS1 & PS2) sel-12, hop-1, spe-4
microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) ptl-1
PARK1 n/a
PARK2 pdr-1
PARK5 ubh-1
PARK6 pink-1
PARK7 djr-1.1 & djr1.2
PARK8 lrk-1
PARK9 catp-6
PARK11 n/a
PARK13 n/a
SOD1 sod-1
SMN1/SMN2 smn-1

Polyglutamine Repeat Diseases

Pathological expansion of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the coding regions of unrelated genes account for at least nine human neurodegenerative disorders, including Huntington’s disease (HD) and spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) (Bauer and Nukina, 2009). The former is the most frequent autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by an increased number of glutamines (polyQ) in the N terminus of the huntingtin protein (Htt), a ubiquitously expressed protein of unknown function (MacDonald et al., 1993). The age of onset and disease severity is directly correlated to the number of polyQ repeats, with sequences of 35 or more glutamines invariably resulting in HD neurodegeneration (Bates G, 2002). The neurons of HD patients contain aggregated N-terminal fragments of mutant Htt in cytoplasmic and intranuclear inclusions in the affected tissues (DiFiglia et al., 1997). Similar aggregates are observed in patient brains in the other polyQ diseases (Bauer and Nukina, 2009). The molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to neuronal dysfunction in the polyQ disorders are unknown.

The nematode C. elegans does not contain an Htt ortholog, but has been widely used to model several aspects of polyglutamine cytoxicity and to identify novel disease modifiers. Faber and co-workers (Faber et al., 1999) used the osm-10 promoter to drive expression of human huntingtin exon 1 fragments of various polyQ lengths in specific sensory neurons of C. elegans (Htn-Q2, Htn-Q23, Htn-Q95 and Htn-Q150). Transgenic animals expressing Htn-Q150 showed evidence of sensory process degeneration based on defective uptake of a lipophilic vital dye via the endings of sensory neurons, but no cell death (scored in ASH neurons, based on endogenous OSM-10 immunoreactivity). Co-expression of the same huntingtin polyQ fragments with sub-threshold levels of a second toxic transgene (OSM-10p::GFP) enhanced the neurodegeneration phenotype. Htn-Q95 and Htn-Q150 caused ASH cell death and dye-filling defects in addition to defective sensory response to touch, mediated by ASH sensory neurons. Formation of huntingtin-positive cytoplasmic aggregates was also evident and increased with age in the sensory and axonal processes of Htn-Q150 ASH neurons (Faber et al., 1999).

The same C. elegans HD model was used in a classical genetic screen to identify mutations that enhanced polyQ neurotoxicity, leading to the discovery of the polyQ-enhancer (pqe-1) gene (Faber et al., 2002). In pqe-1 null animals (completely lacking pqe-1 function), ASH sensory neurons develop normally, but degeneration and cell death is strongly and specifically exacerbated in the presence of Htn-Q150. Over-expression experiments using the pqe-1 cDNA demonstrated that the glutamine/proline rich residues (Q/P) and central charged domain in the amino-terminus and central portion of PQE-1, respectively, are sufficient and necessary for protecting ASH neurons from the toxic effects of polyQ tracts (Faber et al., 2002). No clear pqe-1 ortholog has been identified in humans. However, loss of a similar exonuclease, Rex3p causes synthetic lethality in yeast lacking Rrs1, whose mammalian ortholog has been implicated in Htn polyQ toxicity, suggesting a conserved mechanism may be at work (Carnemolla et al., 2009; Fossale et al., 2002; Nariai et al., 2005). This C. elegans polyQ toxicity model has also been used in conjunction with primary cell culture neurons to demonstrate that acetylation of mutant Htt at K444 leads to an increased clearance of mutant Htt and neuroprotection in vitro and in vivo (Jeong et al., 2009).

An independent HD neuronal model was developed using the mec-7 β-tubulin gene promoter to drive expression of the first 57 amino acids of human huntingtin with normal and expanded polyQ tracts fused to GFP to the six touch receptor neurons of the body (Parker et al., 2001). The consequent mechanosensory defects (Mec) significantly correlated with increased polyQ expansion (increased from 46% to 72% in htt57Q88::GFP and htt57Q128::GFP, respectively). Perinuclear aggregates were evident when either normal or expanded polyQ Htt were expressed in the touch receptor neurons at the tail (PLM) and aggregate presence did not correlate with polyQ length or the mechanosensory defects. Analysis of PLM neurons process integrity in Q128 expressing animals revealed various morphological abnormalities, including swelling of axonal processes, but no apoptotic features (Parker et al., 2001). This polyQ toxicity model has subsequently been used to demonstrate a protective role of the C. elegans huntingtin-interacting protein 1 ortholog (hipr-1) and of other synaptic endocytosis proteins from polyQ toxicity (Parker et al., 2007).

The two HD models (ASH and touch cells) have also been used to examine the role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in polyQ-induced neurodegeneration. In the touch cells, increased expression of the C. elegans ortholog of silent regulator information 2 (sir-2.1), a class III HDAC, rescued the Mec phenotype by 38% in the presence of Q128, and this amelioration was dependent on the activity of daf-16 transcription factor (Forkhead) (Parker et al., 2005). The same authors also saw protection when animals expressing Q128 were treated with resveratrol, a chemical activator of sirtuins. Analysis of HDACs in the ASH polyQ model provided evidence that sir-2.1 is not unique in rescuing polyglutamine cytotoxicity and that the role of HDACs in polyQ toxicity is complex. Loss-of-function alleles and/or RNAi of the majority C. elegans HDAC genes exacerbated Htn-Q150 degeneration (i.e. hda-1, hda-2, hda-4, hda-5, hda-6, hda-10, hda-11, sir-2.1, sir-2.2), while reducing sir-2.3 activity had no effect (Bates et al., 2006). Interestingly, loss of hda-3 significantly reduced degeneration when hda-1 activity was not compromised (Bates et al., 2006)

Genetic manipulations of histone acetylation and deacetylation function in polyQ toxicity have yielded some seemingly discordant results. CBP-acetyltransferase expression or HDAC1 knockdown both increased acetylation of mutant Htt at K444 and facilitated its clearance by autophagosomes (Jeong et al., 2009). And, globally increasing acetylation by treatment with trichostatin A (TSA) which inhibits class I and II HDACs also reduced polyQ toxicity in C. elegans neurons (Bates et al., 2006). Yet, decreasing acetylation by over-expression of sir-2.1 or activation of class III/sirtuins by resveratrol suppressed polyQ toxicity (Parker et al., 2005). These apparently conflicting results can be reconciled by examining the function of each C. elegans HDAC individually (Bates et al., 2006). Decreased function of hda-3, a class I HDAC, suppressed polyQ toxicity in C. elegans; CBP and TSA might act primarily through hda-3, which is an apparent ortholog of vertebrate HDAC1. Class III HDACs/sirtuins likely act on different cellular targets than class I and II HDACs and hence, their manipulation with drugs, over-expression or knockdown has strikingly different effects (Parker et al., 2005; Bates et al., 2006). Combined, these studies suggest that different classes of histone deacetylases likely have specific targets which impact polyQ toxicity in different ways.

A pan-neuronal C. elegans polyQ model using the rgef-1 promoter was generated to examine the consequences of expanded polyQ fragments in individual neurons as well as the effect of neurotoxicity on behavioural outputs (Brignull et al., 2006). In addition to neuronal models, muscle-specific expression of polyQ repeats has been used in C. elegans to delineate mechanisms underlying polyQ aggregation and toxicity. Satyal and co-workers (Satyal et al., 2000) used the unc-54 myosin heavy chain promoter to express short (Q19-GFP) and long (Q82-GFP) fusion proteins in body-wall muscles. The presence of Q82-GFP caused insoluble cytoplasmic aggregates, slowed development, and elevated heat shock response (as observed by elevated β-galactosidase in some cells) (Satyal et al., 2000). These imbalances were partially reversed by expression of the yeast chaperone Hsp104. In the same model, but with polyQ-YFP, the threshold for polyQ-expansion protein aggregation was investigated (Morley et al., 2002). Aggregation (observed as focal instead of diffuse fluorescence in muscle cells) was first evident in Q40-YFP animals that exhibited an intermediate motility defect. The threshold for polyQ aggregation was dynamic and age-dependent, with older animals accumulating aggregates at Q33 and Q35. Both aggregation and motility defects were delayed by loss of AGE-1, the C. elegans ortholog of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) (Morley et al., 2002). This muscle polyQ in vivo model has been used in a genetic screen for polyQ modifier genes; 186 genes with diverse functions affected cellular protein homeostasis based on RNAi knockdown studies (Nollen et al., 2004). Indeed, transgene-induced polyQ expression in muscles or neurons of animals carrying temperature-sensitive mutations in genes unrelated to polyQ toxicity exacerbated genetic defects even at under permissive conditions. Additionally, the presence of the temperature sensitive alleles enhanced the polyQ aggregation phenotype leading to the hypothesis that the cellular pathways critical for protein folding are finite and excessive concentrations of unfolded proteins impact protein homeostasis globally (Gidalevitz et al., 2006).

Additional muscle-specific model systems for polyQ disease related toxicity have been generated in C. elegans. One of these used 17 amino acids of the dentatorubural pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) protein to flank polyQ-GFP fusion proteins and reported that CDC-48.1 and CDC-48.2 chaperone proteins normally suppress the polyQ toxicity by direct interaction with Htt pathogenic polyQ repeats (Nishikori et al., 2008; Yamanaka et al., 2004). Furthermore, a separate in vivo model used the muscle-specific unc-54 promoter and found that increased expression of ubiquilin suppressed motility defects induced by N-terminal Htt-polyQ fragment expression (Wang et al., 2006). The latter model has been used to investigate the role of mitochondria dynamics in relation to expanded polyglutamine HD protein toxicity (Wang et al., 2009a). These models confirm that protein folding is critical in the toxicity of expanded polyQ fragments.

Polyglutamine toxicity in C elegans is age and polyQ tract length dependent, recapitulating critical aspects of human CAG repeat disorders. However, differences in the polyQ threshold required for neurotoxicity has been observed in C. elegans transgenic strains. A polyQ tract of 150 residues is required for ASH neuron degeneration, whereas polyQ repeats of 86 cause aggregates in other neurons (Faber et al., 1999; Bringnull et al., 2006). Furthermore, the threshold in muscle cells is even lower with 33 or 35 polyQ repeats leading to cellular dysfunction (Morley et al., 2002). The results obtained could be attributed to the distinct promoters used and/or to differential sensitivity of cell types targeted. In addition, unpublished data suggests that aggregation and toxicity of the huntingtin first exon is increased by addition of GFP in fusion proteins (unpublished data, A. Hart). Nevertheless, all of the C. elegans models described herein have unique strengths and have provided insights into polyQ protein neurotoxicity.

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the presence of senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the brains of affected individuals. The major constituents of SPs are toxic species of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide (mainly Aβ1-42), whereas NFTs contain hyperphoshorylated and aggregated forms of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) (Goedert and Spillantini, 2006). Aβ peptides derive from the sequential cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretase, respectively, through the “amyloidogenic pathway” (Jacobsen and Iverfeldt, 2009). The identification of mutations in the APP or presenilin-1 (PS1) or presenilin-2 (PS2) genes (components of the γ-secretase enzymatic complex) in familial forms of AD has provided compelling evidence for the “amyloid cascade” hypothesis in AD pathogenesis (Campion et al., 1995; Selkoe, 1996; Sherrington et al., 1996). It is of interest that mutations in the tau gene do not lead to AD but instead to a different neurodegenerative disorder called FTDP-17 (frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism chromosome 17 type) (Hutton et al., 1998; Spillantini et al., 1998). The precise mechanism(s) by which tau and Aβ act as toxic agents in AD are currently unclear.

C. elegans β-amyloid peptide models

C. elegans has an APP-related gene, apl-1, but the APL-1 protein lacks the Aβ peptide (Daigle and Li, 1993). The C. elegans genome encodes three presenilin orthologs (sel-12, hop-1 and spe-4) and additionally, aph-1, pen-2, and aph-2 (nicastrin) whose genes products combine to form the canonical functional γ-secretase complex. Yet, the C. elegans genome does not encode a β-secretase (BACE ortholog). Three engineered C. elegans AD models have been described to date, all of which express the longest and most toxic Aβ species (Aβ1-42) (Link, 1995; Link, 2006; Link et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2006). Transgenic animals expressing a signal peptide/Aβ1-42 fragment under the constitutive unc-54 body wall muscle promoter display progressive paralysis and intracellular cytoplasmic Aβ deposits that colocalize with amyloid specific dyes (thioflavin S and Congo Red) (Link, 1995; Link et al., 2001). A fully penetrant paralysis phenotype was obtained in subsequent models by expressing a temperature-inducible Aβtranscript from a carefully-designed minigene. The signal peptide/Aβ1-42 transcript expression was driven using the myo-3 muscle-specific promoter and incorporated a long 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) for regulation. In transgenic animals, the abnormal 3′ UTR normally leads to an unstable mRNA that is recognized and degraded by the smg RNA surveillance pathway. However, expression of the Aβ transgene in animals harboring a temperature-sensitive smg-1 allele results in stabilization of the Aβ1-42 mRNA and substantial translation due to the inactivation of the nonsense-mediated decay pathway at the restrictive temperature (23°C). Therefore, in contrast to the progressive paralysis phenotype observed in the constitutive Aβ model, the inducible Aβ transgenic animals showed a rapid (~24h) and dramatic paralysis due to high expression levels and muscle degeneration induced by Aβ toxicity (Link et al., 2003; Link et al., 2006). The signal peptide/Aβ1-42 fragment has also been expressed in the neuronal cells (driven by the ubiquitous snb-1 promoter). Intraneuronal deposition of Aβ was observed in transgenic animals along with defects in chemotaxis and hypersensitivity to serotonin, but no overt locomotion defects were found (Link, 2006; Wu et al., 2006). Expression of Aβ in muscles and neurons of C. elegans AD models has distinct consequences for reasons that remain unclear.

To date, most studies have focused on the constitutive (unc-54) and inducible Aβ muscle-specific expression (myo-3) models due to methodological advantages (e.g. RNAi is more efficient in muscle cells and less efficient in neurons). McColl and colleagues (McColl et al., 2009) have recently demonstrated that in the unc-54/signal peptide::Aβ1-42 muscle model, animals predominantly express a truncated Aβ3-42 protein due to a single cleavage site at position +3 of Aβ1-42. All the C. elegans AD models utilize the same signal peptide::Aβ1-42 fragment and it is therefore, likely that the transgenic animals produce the shorter Aβ3-42 form (Teschendorf and Link, 2009).

Cohen et al. (Cohen et al., 2006) examined the role of the insulin/insulin growth factor (IGF)-1-like signaling (IIS) pathway in C. elegans Aβ muscle toxicity (unc-54/Aβ1-42 strain), and demonstrated that the Aβ1-42 toxicity is highly dependent on genes previously implicated in longevity. Knockdown of the insulin/IGF-1 receptor, DAF-2, reduced Aβ1-42 toxicity in the C. elegans body wall muscles through the downstream transcription factors, DAF-16 (Forkhead) and heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1) (Cohen et al., 2006). Down-regulation of daf-16 or hsf-1 had opposing effects on the Aβ1-42 aggregation; the amount of high-molecular weight Aβ species (that are linked to toxicity) was increased upon hsf-1(RNAi) knockdown and decreased upon daf-16 knockdown (Cohen et al., 2006). Toxicity in both polyQ and Aβ1-42 C. elegans models is impacted by the insulin-like signaling pathway, suggesting that common pathways exist in neurodegenerative disorders.

The temperature-dependent C. elegans AD model has been used to study gene expression changes upon Aβ induction (Hassan et al., 2009; Link et al., 2003). DNA microarray analysis identified 67 up-regulated and 240 down-regulated genes upon intracellular Aβ accumulation (Link et al., 2003). Two gene families that were predominantly up-regulated were αB-crystallin (CRYAB), which has been reported to increase Aβ formation (Stege et al., 1999) and the tumor necrosis factor-induced protein 1 (TNFAIP1). These genes were also shown to have increased transcript levels in AD brains (Link et al., 2003). Another transcriptional analysis/microarray study used the same model and demonstrated that over-expression of arsenite-inducible protein (AIP-1) suppressed Aβ toxicity (i.e. decrease in Aβ1-42 peptide accumulation and delayed Aβ-induced paralysis) (Hassan et al., 2009). AIP-1 protection was not specific to Aβ and the authors suggested that AIP-1 expression increased protein turnover and clearance of toxic species, consistent with its role in modulating proteasome function (Stanhill et al., 2006; Yun et al., 2008). The same authors examined the human orthologs of AIP-1 and found that AIRAPL, but not AIRAP, suppressed paralysis in C. elegans (Hassan et al., 2009).

A number of studies have further investigated the role of chaperones in Aβ toxicity (Fonte et al., 2002; Fonte et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2008). Using the unc-54/Aβ1-42 C. elegans model, six Aβ-interacting proteins with a chaperone-like function were identified by mass spectrometry: two HSP70 orthologs (HSP70A and HSP70C), three HSP16 proteins (HSP-16.1, 16.2 and 16.48), and a tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein, the ortholog of the human SGT protein, suggested to negatively regulate HSP70 (Fonte et al., 2002; Liu et al., 1999). In this study, HSP-16 was found to co-immunoprecipitate and to closely co-localize with intracellular Aβ (Fonte et al., 2002). Fonte and co-workers (Fonte et al., 2008) further investigated the biological role of HSP-16.2 on Aβ toxicity in the temperature-inducible AD model. HSP-16.2 over-expression partially suppressed the Aβ-induced paralysis phenotype, but did not reduce the total Aβ protein accumulation, suggesting that other chaperones may be involved. Indeed, a subsequent study applied a protective heat shock treatment (2h, 35°C) in the same inducible transgenic model and found a remarkable delay in paralysis, increased HSP-16.2 protein expression, and a significant reduction of oligomeric Aβ species but not total Aβ levels (Wu et al., 2008). Combined, all of these studies suggest that protein turnover is a critical determinant in Aβ toxicity reminiscent of results in polyQ models.

C. elegans tauopathy models

Tau aggregates are a common characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease, but they are also found in other neurodegenerative disorders that are commonly referred to as tauopathies. C. elegans has a single tau ortholog, named ptl-1 (Goedert et al., 1996; McDermott et al., 1996). ptl-1 is expressed in many cells including C. elegans mechanosensory neurons of the body; loss of ptl-1 decreases the number of viable progeny and these animals are slightly less sensitive to body touch (Gordon et al., 2008). As ptl-1 loss-of-function does not recapitulate tau pathology, transgenic C. elegans expressing human tau has been used to establish tauopathy models.

Pan-neuronal expression (aex-3 promoter) of the most abundant human brain tau isoform (4R1N) and mutant tau (V337M and P301L) resulted in uncoordinated (Unc) locomotion, followed by progressive accumulation of insoluble tau aggregates, axonal abnormalities, and loss of GABAergic inhibitory motor neurons (Kraemer et al., 2003). Animals expressing mutant tau were more severely affected in young animals, consistent with the toxicity of FTDP-17 mutations in human disease (Kraemer et al., 2003). In addition, when expressed in C. elegans, both normal and mutant human tau were phosphorylated at sites hyperphosphorylated in AD and FTDP-17, although no differences were observed between mutant and normal tau lines (Kraemer et al., 2003). The tau-induced Unc locomotion defect was used as a behavioral read-out in a genome-wide RNAi feeding screen for genetic modifiers that would exacerbate or alleviate the behavioral defects caused by mutant tau expression. A library of RNAi clones corresponding to over 16,000 C. elegans genes (Kamath et al., 2003) was screened using the 337M-1 mutant strain. Sixty genes were identified that enhanced only the tau-induced behavioral defect including kinases, phosphotases, chaperones, proteases and genes unique to nematodes (Kraemer et al., 2006). Mammalian orthologs of some of these modifier genes had been previously implicated in human tauopathies (e.g. GSK-3β, CSTE, CHRNA7). Loss-of-function alleles were also used to validate eight candidate modifier genes (Kraemer et al., 2006). A classical chemical mutagenesis, forward genetic screen for modifier genes was also undertaken using the aex-3/tau transgenic model. Two novel candidate genes, sut-1 (Kraemer and Schellenberg, 2007b) and sut-2 (Guthrie et al., 2009), whose loss-of-function strongly ameliorated the tau-induced neurodegeneration, were identified. SUT-1 binds in vitro to the cytoskeletal regulated protein Enabled (ENA), UNC-34, and sut-1 suppression of the tau-induced Unc phenotype was dependent on unc-34 activity (Kraemer and Schellenberg, 2007b). SUT-2 interacted directly with ZYG-12, a HOOK protein family member (Guthrie et al., 2009). Interestingly, mammalian SUT-2 (MSUT-2) interacts in vitro with a human HOOK ortholog, HOOK2 that plays a role in the formation of centriolar aggresome containing misfolded proteins (Szebenyi et al., 2007).

An additional C. elegans model of AD-relevant tau modification utilized the pan-neuronal rgef-1 promoter to express human tau (fetal form) or pseudohyperphosphorylated (PHP) tau (ten serine/threonine residues were exchanged by glutamate) (Brandt et al., 2009). Human tau was highly phosphorylated in the C. elegans neurons reminiscent of the hyperphophorylation seen in paired helical filaments (PHFs) isolated from AD patients. Uncoordinated locomotion was observed in both the normal and mutant tau transgenic lines, but axonal abnormalities in inhibitory motor neurons were more profound in PHP tau-expressing animals (Brandt et al., 2009). Tau-aggregation was only observed in the PHP tau strains and not in the wild type tau transgenic animals, possibly due to the different normal tau isoform used in the current study (fetal brain) (Brandt et al., 2009). Another human tauopathy disease in vivo model was developed by Miyasaka and co-workers (Miyasaka et al., 2005) by expressing human wild type (0N4R and 0N3R) or FTDP-17 mutant tau (P301L and R406W) in the six mechanosensory neurons of the body, using the C. elegans mec-7 promoter. Mutant tau transgenic lines exhibited an age-dependent decline in the touch response, whereas wild type tau lines were only slightly affected. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis revealed abnormal neuronal morphology in the mutant-tau expressing animals (swellings of cell bodies with thinner processes), accumulation of phosphorylated tau and disorganized microtubules in the PLM mechanosensory neurons (Miyasaka et al., 2005). Furthermore, over-expression of human HSP70 in the mutant tau transgenic animals significantly improved their touch response, whereas over-expression of the mammalian GSK-3β kinase slightly exacerbated tau-induced neurodegeneration (Miyasaka et al., 2005), the latter observation being consistent with Drosophila studies (Jackson et al., 2002). Results from these models suggests that classical and RNAi based screening can reveal modifier pathways, that protein turnover is critical, and that microtubule transport may play a role in tauopathies.

Parkinson’s Disease

C. elegans α-synuclein models

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons (DA) and the accumulation of protein inclusions in PD patient brains, called Lewy bodies (LB) (Lang and Lozano, 1998; Olanow and Tatton, 1999). The most abundant protein in LBs is α-synuclein (α-syn) which is normally found in presynaptic terminals and nuclei. Multiplications (duplication and triplication) or mutations of the PARK1 locus that encodes α-syn results in familial PD (Conway et al., 2000; Polymeropoulos et al., 1997; Singleton et al., 2003). Genetic analysis in humans has identified eight additional PD loci: PARK2, PARK5, PARK6, PARK7, PARK8, PARK9, PARK11 and PARK13. Six of these genes have C. elegans orthologs, despite the absence of a C. elegans α-syn ortholog (Harrington et al., 2010) (Table 1). Since LBs are the pathological hallmark of PD, a plethora of C. elegans PD models have been generated to examine α-syn toxicity.

Lakso et al. (Lakso et al., 2003) over-expressed human wild type (WT) and mutant (A53T) α-syn together with GFP using pan-neuronal (aex-3), dopaminergic (dat-1) and two motor-neuron specific promoters, unc-30 and acr-2. Locomotion deficits (in swimming also known as thrashing) were caused by WT or A53T α-syn expression in all neurons or just motor neurons, but not in dopaminergic neurons. Interestingly, a significant loss of dopaminergic neurons (CEP, ADE and PDE) and their dendritic processes was observed in animals carrying WT or A53T α-syn constructs driven by dat-1 and aex-3 promoters, but not by the acr-2 cholinergic motor neuron promoter (Lakso et al., 2003). This dopaminergic neuron toxicity was subsequently confirmed by Cao and co-workers (Cao et al., 2005) using transgenic C. elegans over-expressing human α-syn in dopaminergic neurons, which resulted in age-dependent neuronal loss. The dat-1/WT α-syn animals were also used to demonstrate the neuroprotective role of the ER-associated protein with chaperone-like activity, TorsinA and Rab1A. The latter is a GTPase involved in ER-to-Golgi transport (Cao et al., 2005; Cooper et al., 2006). TorsinA is found in Lewy bodies in dopaminergic neurons and its perturbation causes early-onset torsion dystonia (Ozelius et al., 1997; Sharma et al., 2001). These studies suggest a link between α-syn toxicity and ER-Golgi vesicular trafficking.

Another C. elegans synuclein model found accumulation of α-syn in the cell bodies and neurites of dopaminergic neurons over-expressing wild type or mutant (A53T and A30P) α-syn, but no significant loss of CEP cell bodies (Kuwahara et al., 2006). Interestingly, a subset of WT, A53T and A30P transgenic worms showed positive immunoreactivity to phosphorylated α-syn at Ser-129, a characteristic of α-syn deposited in human Lewy bodies (Fujiwara et al., 2002). This C. elegans model was the first to report dysfunction in a previously described dopaminergic behavior, altered response to food, due to A53T and A30P α-syn over-expression in dopaminergic neurons (Kuwahara et al., 2006). A large-scale RNAi feeding screen was conducted in a neuronal RNAi supersensitive background (eri-1), by overexpressing α-syn WT or pathogenic mutant (A53T or A30P) constructs under the control of unc-51 pan-neuronal promoter (Kuwahara et al., 2008). Knockdown of four out of 1673 neuronal genes enhanced α-syn-induced neurotoxicity in this model, implicating synaptic endocytosis (apa-2, aps-2, eps-8 and rab-7). Subsequent studies with loss-of-function endocytosis genes (e.g. unc-11, unc-26, unc-57), pharmacological and immunohistochemical analysis supported the hypothesis that the endocytosis pathway impacts role of α-syn toxicity (Kuwahara et al., 2008).

As described above for polyQ aggregation, some research groups have developed C. elegans models that focus on protein misfolding by expressing α-syn::GFP (or YFP) fusion fragments in C. elegans body-wall muscles using the unc-54 promoter (Hamamichi et al., 2008; van Ham et al., 2008). Hamamichi et al. screened 868 genes by RNAi which were selected based on a bioinformatic analysis of PD-associated genes/pathways; the authors found twenty genes that enhanced α-syn::GFP age-associated aggregation. TOR-2 (C. elegans ortholog of TorsinA) was also co-expressed with α-syn in this model in order to maintain α-syn protein at a threshold level of expression. This analysis was subsequently extended to neurons; five genes were identified whose co-expression with α-syn provided significant neuroprotection in dopaminergic neurons (Hamamichi et al., 2008). For one of these genes, a subsequent study demonstrated that expression of the human ortholog, VSP41, which is a lysosomal trafficking protein, protected neuroblastoma cells from the toxic effects of the dopamine-specific neurotoxins 6-OHDA and rotenone (Ruan et al., 2010). Another genome-wide RNAi screen by van Ham and colleagues (van Ham et al., 2008), identified 80 genes, whose knock-down suppressed age-dependent α-syn::YFP aggregation in inclusions. Some of these genes have functions in vesicular transport, lipid metabolism and aging-pathways, previously suggested to play a role in PD pathogenesis. For three of these genes, sir2.1, lagr-1 and ymel-1, their effect was independently confirmed by genetic deletion strains (van Ham et al., 2008). Both aforementioned studies (Hamamichi et al., 2008; van Ham et al., 2008) successfully identified modifiers that were not specific to other forms of aggregation, i.e. polyQ-dependent misfolding but failed to recover common genes, possibly due to technical differences.

C. elegans LRRK2 PD model

Mutations of the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2/PARK8) gene cause autosomal-dominant familial Parkinson’s disease (Paisan-Ruiz et al., 2004; Zimprich et al., 2004). LRRK2 is a large protein of unknown function with multiple conserved domains (Zimprich et al., 2004). Pan-neuronal expression of human WT or mutant (G2019S) LRRK2 using the snb-1 promoter resulted in preferential loss of dopaminergic neurons, consistent with selective sensitivity of dopaminergic neurons in PD (Saha et al., 2009). Furthermore, WT LRRK2 expression increased dopaminergic neuron survival upon rotenone- or paraquat-induced mitochondria stress. Similarly with this result, knockdown of the C. elegans LRRK2 ortholog (lrk-1) also sensitized animals against rotenone (Saha et al., 2009). The neuronal specificity of this and the aforementioned LRRK2 and synuclein models bodes well for dissection of PD pathological mechanisms in C. elegans.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder and approximately 20% of familial ALS (FALS) cases are associated with mutations in the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 gene (SOD1) (Cudkowicz et al., 1997). Oeda et al. were the first to generate a C. elegans ALS model by introducing human wild type and FALS (A4V, G37R and G93A) SOD1 constructs under the control of hsp16-2 heat shock and myo-3 muscle-specific promoters (Oeda et al., 2001). No discernable changes in C. elegans survival or behavior were observed. However, mutant SOD1 expression rendered animals more sensitive to paraquat-induced oxidative stress. Furthermore, oxidative stress significantly reduced the degradation rate of mutant SOD1 protein, the latter found to accumulate in the form of discrete aggregates when expressed in muscle cells (Oeda et al., 2001). In a subsequent study, pan-neuronal expression (C. elegans snb-1 promoter) of a mutant form of SOD1 (G85R or G85R-YFP) did result in defective behavior that correlated with SOD1 aggregation (Wang et al., 2009b). This snb-1/G85R-YFP transgenic model was used in a genome-wide RNAi screen in a eri-1;lin-15B sensitized background to identify modifier genes. Eighty one RNAi clones increased the number of SOD1 G85R-YFP fluorescent inclusions; the corresponding genes encode chaperone components, but also other unexpected genes, including TGF-β, SUMO and Topoisomerase I (Wang et al., 2009b). SOD1 toxicity was also examined by Gidalevitz and co-workers (Gidalevitz et al., 2009) using wild type and mutant SOD1-YFP fusion proteins (G85R, G93A, 127X) expressed in C. elegans muscle cells by the unc-54 promoter. Aggregates were only evident in C. elegans expressing the mutant SOD1 proteins (consistent with Wang et al.) and these were associated with limited toxicity in the muscle cells (assessed using phenotypic assays and visualization of actin filaments) (Gidalevitz et al., 2009). Interestingly, animals carrying the three SOD1 mutant transgenes displayed synthetic toxicity with the same unrelated temperature sensitive (ts) mutants that enhanced polyQ aggregation described above (Gidalevitz et al., 2006). Overall, both studies (Gidalevitz et al., 2006; Gidalevitz et al., 2009) suggest that aggregation-prone proteins and mildly destabilized mutations compete for the limited cell folding machinery, which may be of significant import in neurodegenerative disease.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is now the most common genetic cause of infant mortality in North America and is caused by diminished SMN protein function (Cartegni and Krainer, 2002; Crawford and Pardo, 1996; Feldkotter et al., 2002; Kashima and Manley, 2003; Lefebvre et al., 1997; Lorson et al., 1999; Pearn, 1978). In SMA patients, α-motor neurons in the spinal cord become dysfunctional or degenerate with atrophy of the corresponding muscles (Crawford and Pardo, 1996). The C. elegans genome harbors a single smn-1 gene, which encodes a highly conserved SMN ortholog (Miguel-Aliaga et al., 1999). The deletion allele smn-1(ok355) results in SMN-1 loss of function and neuromuscular function deficits; few homozygous mutant animals reach adulthood (Briese et al., 2009). Neuronal, but not muscle, expression of smn-1 rescues the smn-1(ok355) phenotype (Briese et al., 2009). We have initiated studies (RNAi genome-wide screen and behavioral assays) by using the loss-of-function smn-1(ok355) allele to explore the genetic circuitry affecting SMN neuromuscular function in C. elegans. Our preliminary data suggests that the TGFβ/BMP signaling pathway plays a role in SMN loss-of-function neuromuscular pathology, consistent with a previous report in Drosophila (Chang et al., 2008).

Conclusions /Future Perspectives

Identification of many human genes that cause or predispose us to neurodegenerative diseases has been enormously helpful in demystifying these crippling diseases, allowing us to ascribe toxic functions to specific proteins. However, many years of research have not yielded definitive insights into why these genes cause degeneration of specific neuron populations or why disease-associated proteins cause neuronal dysfunction and death. Explaining these conundrums would provide invaluable clues for therapy development. Genetic techniques in invertebrate model organisms have been used to delineate numerous conserved mechanisms including apoptosis, Ras/MAPK and other signaling pathways. It seems likely that a similar approach will expose the conserved pathways critical in neurodegenerative diseases that have eluded us. Forward and reverse genetic approaches in invertebrates have identified and confirmed many novel disease-associated genes/pathways that were not previously implicated in neurodegenerative disorders. These putative modifier genes are interesting candidates for further investigation in vertebrate models. Indeed, when vertebrate orthologs of invertebrate modifiers are tested, they almost invariably are found to impact neurodegeneration across species. This conservation is particularly advantageous as vertebrate models are often expensive and unwieldy for large-scale pathway identification and analysis.

Some of the pathways pertinent to neurodegenerative disease have already been revealed by analyses in C. elegans and other invertebrate models. It has become clear that cellular protein homeostasis and chaperone function is critical in this pathology. Over-expression of specific chaperones can ameliorate neuronal toxicity and cellular death while loss of specific chaperones exacerbates or accelerates degeneration. Additionally, the effects of insulin-like signaling pathway on aging have helped scientists to explore the mechanistic link between aging and the cellular pathways that lead to induced-aggregate toxicity. Interestingly, mammalian miRNA regulation has recently been implicated in neurodegenerative disorders, such as PD, with the dopaminergic neuron-specific miR-133b being down-regulated in the mid-brain tissue from PD patients (Kim et al., 2007) and miR-7 inhibiting α-syn protein levels by directly binding to its 3′-untranslated region (UTR) mRNA (Junn et al., 2009). A recent study (Asikainen et al., 2010) identified twelve miRNAs that were differentially expressed in the dopaminergic C. elegans neurons expressing mutant (A53T) α-syn, suggesting that miRNA regulation in PD pathogenesis may be conserved across species and hence, indicating an fruitful field for future research.

Though not described herein, a number of studies have utilized C. elegans neurodegenerative disease models to assess the efficacy of pharmacological compounds. Resperine, an FDA approved antihypertensive drug, enhanced longevity, stress tolerance and delayed paralysis in the unc-54/Aβ1-42 animals (Arya et al., 2009). Furthermore, the Gingko biloba leaf extract Egb 761 and its component, ginkgolide A, were tested in all C. elegans AD models and were found to alleviate the Aβ-pathological behaviors, including paralysis, reduced chemotaxis, and serotonin hypersensitivity {Wu, 2006 #38}. Voisine and co-investigators identified two FDA approved drugs, lithium chloride and mithramycin, that independently and in combination suppressed polyQ-induced neurotoxicity (Voisine et al., 2007). Despite the technical limitations (i.e. effective compound dose, penetration and bioavailabilty) that could complicate the use of C. elegans models, it is clear that many of the models described above could be used for medium and high-throughput drug screening technologies across multiple genetic backgrounds. Combining invertebrate genetic studies with drug screening may be the most rapid approach possible in identifying pathological pathways and developing therapies for neurodegenerative disease.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the NIH, SMA Foundation and an anonymous charitable foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Artal-Sanz M, Tavernarakis N. Proteolytic mechanisms in necrotic cell death and neurodegeneration. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:3287–96. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arya U, et al. Reserpine ameliorates Abeta toxicity in the Alzheimer’s disease model in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol. 2009;44:462–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asikainen S, et al. Global microRNA Expression Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans Parkinson’s Disease Models. J Mol Neurosci. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s12031-009-9325-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates EA, et al. Differential contributions of Caenorhabditis elegans histone deacetylases to huntingtin polyglutamine toxicity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2830–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3344-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates G, et al. Huntington’s Disease. 3rd edn Oxford University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer PO, Nukina N. The pathogenic mechanisms of polyglutamine diseases and current therapeutic strategies. J Neurochem. 2009;110:1737–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandt R, et al. A Caenorhabditis elegans model of tau hyperphosphorylation: induction of developmental defects by transgenic overexpression of Alzheimer’s disease-like modified tau. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Briese M, et al. Deletion of smn-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of the spinal muscular atrophy gene, results in locomotor dysfunction and reduced lifespan. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:97–104. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brignull HR, et al. Polyglutamine proteins at the pathogenic threshold display neuron-specific aggregation in a pan-neuronal Caenorhabditis elegans model. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7597–606. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0990-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campion D, et al. Mutations of the presenilin I gene in families with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:2373–7. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.12.2373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cao S, et al. Torsin-mediated protection from cellular stress in the dopaminergic neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2005;25:3801–12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5157-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carnemolla A, et al. Rrs1 is involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress response in Huntington disease. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:18167–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.018325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cartegni L, Krainer AR. Disruption of an SF2/ASF-dependent exonic splicing enhancer in SMN2 causes spinal muscular atrophy in the absence of SMN1. Nat Genet. 2002;30:377–84. doi: 10.1038/ng854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chalfie M, Wolinsky E. The identification and suppression of inherited neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1990;345:410–6. doi: 10.1038/345410a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chang H, et al. Modeling Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 2008;15:e3209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen E, et al. Opposing activities protect against age-onset proteotoxicity. Science. 2006;313:1604–10. doi: 10.1126/science.1124646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Conway KA, et al. Acceleration of oligomerization, not fibrillization, is a shared property of both alpha-synuclein mutations linked to early-onset Parkinson’s disease: implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:571–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cooper AA, et al. Alpha-synuclein blocks ER-Golgi traffic and Rab1 rescues neuron loss in Parkinson’s models. Science. 2006;313:324–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1129462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Crawford TO, Pardo CA. The neurobiology of childhood spinal muscular atrophy. Neurobiol Dis. 1996;3:97–110. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1996.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cudkowicz ME, et al. Epidemiology of mutations in superoxide dismutase in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:210–21. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Culetto E, Sattelle DB. A role for Caenorhabditis elegans in understanding the function and interactions of human disease genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:869–77. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.6.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Daigle I, Li C. apl-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans gene encoding a protein related to the human beta-amyloid protein precursor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:12045–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.12045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. DiFiglia M, et al. Aggregation of huntingtin in neuronal intranuclear inclusions and dystrophic neurites in brain. Science. 1997;277:1990–3. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5334.1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Driscoll M. Molecular genetics of cell death in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurobiol. 1992;23:1327–51. doi: 10.1002/neu.480230919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Faber PW, et al. Polyglutamine-mediated dysfunction and apoptotic death of a Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neuron. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:179–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Faber PW, et al. Glutamine/proline-rich PQE-1 proteins protect Caenorhabditis elegans neurons from huntingtin polyglutamine neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:17131–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262544899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Feldkotter M, et al. Quantitative analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 based on real-time lightCycler PCR: fast and highly reliable carrier testing and prediction of severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:358–68. doi: 10.1086/338627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fonte V, et al. Interaction of intracellular beta amyloid peptide with chaperone proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:9439–44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152313999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fonte V, et al. Suppression of in vivo beta-amyloid peptide toxicity by overexpression of the HSP-16.2 small chaperone protein. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:784–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703339200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fossale E, et al. Identification of a presymptomatic molecular phenotype in Hdh CAG knock-in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2233–41. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.19.2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fujiwara H, et al. alpha-Synuclein is phosphorylated in synucleinopathy lesions. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:160–4. doi: 10.1038/ncb748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gidalevitz T, et al. Progressive disruption of cellular protein folding in models of polyglutamine diseases. Science. 2006;311:1471–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1124514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gidalevitz T, et al. Destabilizing protein polymorphisms in the genetic background direct phenotypic expression of mutant SOD1 toxicity. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goedert M, et al. PTL-1, a microtubule-associated protein with tau-like repeats from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 11):2661–72. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.11.2661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Goedert M, Spillantini MG. A century of Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2006;314:777–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1132814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gordon P, et al. The invertebrate microtubule-associated protein PTL-1 functions in mechanosensation and development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:541–51. doi: 10.1007/s00427-008-0250-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Guthrie CR, et al. SUT-2 potentiates tau-induced neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:1825–38. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hamamichi S, et al. Hypothesis-based RNAi screening identifies neuroprotective genes in a Parkinson’s disease model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:728–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711018105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Harrington AJ, et al. C. elegans as a model organism to investigate molecular pathways involved with Parkinson’s disease. Dev Dyn. 2010 doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hassan WM, et al. AIP-1 ameliorates beta-amyloid peptide toxicity in a Caenorhabditis elegans Alzheimer’s disease model. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2739–47. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hutton M, et al. Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature. 1998;393:702–5. doi: 10.1038/31508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jackson GR, et al. Human wild-type tau interacts with wingless pathway components and produces neurofibrillary pathology in Drosophila. Neuron. 2002;34:509–19. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00706-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jacobsen KT, Iverfeldt K. Amyloid precursor protein and its homologues: a family of proteolysis-dependent receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:2299–318. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0020-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jeong H, et al. Acetylation targets mutant huntingtin to autophagosomes for degradation. Cell. 2009;137:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Junn E, et al. Repression of alpha-synuclein expression and toxicity by microRNA-7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13052–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906277106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kamath RS, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003;421:231–7. doi: 10.1038/nature01278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kashima T, Manley JL. A negative element in SMN2 exon 7 inhibits splicing in spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Genet. 2003;34:460–3. doi: 10.1038/ng1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kim J, et al. A MicroRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science. 2007;317:1220–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1140481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kraemer B, Schellenberg GD. Using Caenorhabditis elegans models of neurodegenerative disease to identify neuroprotective strategies. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007a;77:219–46. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(06)77007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kraemer BC, et al. Molecular pathways that influence human tau-induced pathology in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:1483–96. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kraemer BC, Schellenberg GD. SUT-1 enables tau-induced neurotoxicity in C. elegans. Hum Mol Genet. 2007b;16:1959–71. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kraemer BC, et al. Neurodegeneration and defective neurotransmission in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of tauopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9980–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1533448100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kuwahara T, et al. Familial Parkinson mutant alpha-synuclein causes dopamine neuron dysfunction in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:334–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504860200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuwahara T, et al. A systematic RNAi screen reveals involvement of endocytic pathway in neuronal dysfunction in alpha-synuclein transgenic C. elegans. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:2997–3009. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lakso M, et al. Dopaminergic neuronal loss and motor deficits in Caenorhabditis elegans overexpressing human alpha-synuclein. J Neurochem. 2003;86:165–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lang AE, Lozano AM. Parkinson’s disease. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1044–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810083391506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lefebvre S, et al. Correlation between severity and SMN protein level in spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Genet. 1997;16:265–9. doi: 10.1038/ng0797-265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Levitan D, et al. Assessment of normal and mutant human presenilin function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14940–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Link CD. Expression of human beta-amyloid peptide in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:9368–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Link CD. C. elegans models of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases: lessons from transgenic worm models of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41:1007–13. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2006.06.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Link CD, et al. Visualization of fibrillar amyloid deposits in living, transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans animals using the sensitive amyloid dye, X-34. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:217–26. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Link CD, et al. Gene expression analysis in a transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans Alzheimer’s disease model. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:397–413. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00224-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu FH, et al. Specific interaction of the 70-kDa heat shock cognate protein with the tetratricopeptide repeats. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:34425–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lorson CL, et al. A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6307–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. MacDonald CMA, et al. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993;72:971–83. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. McColl G, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans A beta 1-42 model of Alzheimer disease predominantly expresses A beta 3-42. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:22697–702. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C109.028514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. McDermott JB, et al. ptl-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans gene whose products are homologous to the tau microtubule-associated proteins. Biochemistry. 1996;35:9415–23. doi: 10.1021/bi952646n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Miguel-Aliaga I, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans orthologue of the human gene responsible for spinal muscular atrophy is a maternal product critical for germline maturation and embryonic viability. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:2133–43. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.12.2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Miyasaka T, et al. Progressive neurodegeneration in C. elegans model of tauopathy. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;20:372–83. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Morley JF, et al. The threshold for polyglutamine-expansion protein aggregation and cellular toxicity is dynamic and influenced by aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10417–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152161099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nariai M, et al. Synergistic defect in 60S ribosomal subunit assembly caused by a mutation of Rrs1p, a ribosomal protein L11-binding protein, and 3′-extension of 5S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:4553–62. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nishikori S, et al. p97 Homologs from Caenorhabditis elegans, CDC-48.1 and CDC-48.2, suppress the aggregate formation of huntingtin exon1 containing expanded polyQ repeat. Genes Cells. 2008;13:827–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Nollen EA, et al. Genome-wide RNA interference screen identifies previously undescribed regulators of polyglutamine aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6403–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307697101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Oeda T, et al. Oxidative stress causes abnormal accumulation of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-related mutant SOD1 in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:2013–23. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.19.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Olanow CW, Tatton WG. Etiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:123–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ozelius LJ, et al. The early-onset torsion dystonia gene (DYT1) encodes an ATP-binding protein. Nat Genet. 1997;17:40–8. doi: 10.1038/ng0997-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Paisan-Ruiz C, et al. Cloning of the gene containing mutations that cause PARK8-linked Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2004;44:595–600. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Park KW, Li L. Cytoplasmic expression of mouse prion protein causes severe toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;372:697–702. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Parker JA, et al. Resveratrol rescues mutant polyglutamine cytotoxicity in nematode and mammalian neurons. Nat Genet. 2005;37:349–50. doi: 10.1038/ng1534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Parker JA, et al. Expanded polyglutamines in Caenorhabditis elegans cause axonal abnormalities and severe dysfunction of PLM mechanosensory neurons without cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13318–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231476398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Parker JA, et al. Huntingtin-interacting protein 1 influences worm and mouse presynaptic function and protects Caenorhabditis elegans neurons against mutant polyglutamine toxicity. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11056–64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1941-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pearn J. Incidence, prevalence, and gene frequency studies of chronic childhood spinal muscular atrophy. J Med Genet. 1978;15:409–13. doi: 10.1136/jmg.15.6.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Polymeropoulos MH, et al. Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science. 1997;276:2045–7. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ruan Q, et al. VPS41, a protein involved in lysosomal trafficking, is protective in Caenorhabditis elegans and mammalian cellular models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37:330–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Saha S, et al. LRRK2 modulates vulnerability to mitochondrial dysfunction in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9210–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2281-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Satyal SH, et al. Polyglutamine aggregates alter protein folding homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:5750–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100107297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Selkoe DJ. Amyloid beta-protein and the genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:18295–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.31.18295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sharma N, et al. A close association of torsinA and alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies: a fluorescence resonance energy transfer study. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:339–44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61700-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Sherrington R, et al. Alzheimer’s disease associated with mutations in presenilin 2 is rare and variably penetrant. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:985–8. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.7.985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Singleton AB, et al. alpha-Synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease. Science. 2003;302:841. doi: 10.1126/science.1090278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Spillantini MG, et al. Mutation in the tau gene in familial multiple system tauopathy with presenile dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:7737–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Springer W, et al. A Caenorhabditis elegans Parkin mutant with altered solubility couples alpha-synuclein aggregation to proteotoxic stress. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3407–23. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Stanhill A, et al. An arsenite-inducible 19S regulatory particle-associated protein adapts proteasomes to proteotoxicity. Mol Cell. 2006;23:875–85. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Stege GJ, et al. The molecular chaperone alphaB-crystallin enhances amyloid beta neurotoxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;262:152–6. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sym M, et al. A model for niemann-pick type C disease in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2000;10:527–30. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00468-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Szebenyi G, et al. Hook2 contributes to aggresome formation. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Teschendorf D, Link CD. What have worm models told us about the mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction in human neurodegenerative diseases? Mol Neurodegener. 2009;4:38. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-4-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. van Ham TJ, et al. C. elegans model identifies genetic modifiers of alpha-synuclein inclusion formation during aging. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Voisine C, et al. Identification of potential therapeutic drugs for huntington’s disease using Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 2007;2:e504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang H, et al. Effects of overexpression of huntingtin proteins on mitochondrial integrity. Hum Mol Genet. 2009a;18:737–52. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang H, et al. Suppression of polyglutamine-induced toxicity in cell and animal models of Huntington’s disease by ubiquilin. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:1025–41. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang J, et al. An ALS-linked mutant SOD1 produces a locomotor defect associated with aggregation and synaptic dysfunction when expressed in neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2009b;5:e1000350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. White JG, et al. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. Philos. Trans R. Soc Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1986;314:1–340. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wu Y, et al. Heat shock treatment reduces beta amyloid toxicity in vivo by diminishing oligomers. Neurobiol Aging. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wu Y, et al. Amyloid-beta-induced pathological behaviors are suppressed by Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 and ginkgolides in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2006;26:13102–13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3448-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Yamanaka K, et al. Analysis of the two p97/VCP/Cdc48p proteins of Caenorhabditis elegans and their suppression of polyglutamine-induced protein aggregation. J Struct Biol. 2004;146:242–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Yun C, et al. Proteasomal adaptation to environmental stress links resistance to proteotoxicity with longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7094–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707025105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zimprich A, et al. Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron. 2004;44:601–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES