Abstract
Neurosteroids exert potent physiological effects by allosterically modulating synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors. Some endogenous neurosteroids, such as 3α, 21-dihydroxy-5β-pregnan-20-one (5α, 3α-THDOC), potentiate GABAA receptor function by interacting with a binding pocket defined by conserved residues in the first and fourth transmembrane (TM) domains of α subunits. Others, such as pregnenolone sulfate (PS), inhibit GABAA receptor function through as-yet unidentified binding sites. Here we investigate the mechanisms of PS inhibition of mammalian GABAA receptors, based on studies of PS inhibition of the UNC-49 GABA receptor, a GABAA-like receptor from Caenorhabditis elegans. In UNC-49, a 19 residue segment of TM1 can be mutated to increase or decrease PS sensitivity over a 20-fold range. Surprisingly, substituting these UNC-49 sequences into mammalian α1, β2, and γ2 subunits did not produce the corresponding effects on PS sensitivity of the resulting chimeric receptors. Therefore, it is unlikely that a conserved PS binding pocket is formed at this site. However we observed several interesting unexpected effects. First, chimeric γ2 subunits caused increased efficacy of 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation; second, spontaneous gating of α6β2δ receptors was blocked by PS, and reduced by chimeric β2 subunits; and third, direct activation of α6β2δ receptors by 5α, 3α-THDOC was reduced by chimeric β2 subunits. These results reveal novel roles for non-α subunits in neurosteroid modulation and direct activation, and show that the β subunit TM1 domain is important for spontaneous activity of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors.
Keywords: GABAA receptor, neurosteroid, PS, THDOC, direct activation, spontaneous opening
Introduction
Neurosteroids are endogenous steroid molecules in the brain that can allosterically potentiate or inhibit GABAA receptor function [2, 8]. Both synaptic (eg. α1β2γ2) and extrasynaptic (eg. α6β2δ) GABAA receptors can be modulated by neurosteroids; extrasynaptic GABAA receptors may be of particular importance as targets of neurosteroid modulation [13, 21]. Enhancing neurosteroids, such as 5α, 3α-THDOC, play a role in depression, seizure susceptibility, ethanol action, and many other nervous system functions [15, 16]. Inhibitory neurosteroids, such as PS, are proconvulsive [11, 24], and enhance learning and memory [22], although some of these effects may be due to modulation of other channels such as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors [26] and voltage-gated calcium channels [5]. Further investigation into the structural basis of neurosteroid potentiation and inhibition of GABAA receptors will be important to better understand the physiological basis of neurosteroid effects on behavior, and to exploit their therapeutic potential.
Recent studies have identified GABAA receptor residues important for positive and negative modulation by neurosteroids. A putative binding site for neurosteroid potentiation is formed by residues Q241 in TM1 and N407 in TM4 [10]. A separate binding site for direct activation by higher concentrations of neurosteroids is formed by residues T236 in the α1 subunit TM1 and Y284 in the β2 subunit TM3 [10]. Inhibitory neurosteroids appear to act at distinct sites [6, 19, 27], and a residue within the TM2 pore-forming domain plays an important role [1]. Studies of the GABAA receptor homolog of Caenorhabditis elegans, UNC-49, also identified several residues near the enhancing neurosteroid site that were important for PS inhibition [23], suggesting the possibility that positive and negative neurosteroid modulation may have some shared structural foundation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this part of the TM1 domain controls PS sensitivity of the mammalian GABAA receptor as well. We swapped a segment of the C. elegans GABA receptor TM1 domain that correlates with PS insensitivity into mammalian α, β, and γ GABAA receptor subunits, which are normally PS sensitive, and tested whether PS sensitivity decreased. The results provide several novel insights into the structural basis of neurosteroid action and, unexpectedly, implicate the β2 subunit TM1 domain as a determinant of spontaneous openings in extrasynaptic GABAA receptors.
Materials and Methods
Sequences used were as follows: NP000797 (human α1), NP032096 (rat β2), NP000807.2 (human γ2S), NM000815 (human δ) NM021841 (rat α6), AAD42383 (C. elegans UNC-49B.1), AAD42387 (C. elegans UNC-49C). Sequences differences between rat and human are minor: outside of the large intracellular loop between TM3 and TM4, β2 subunits are identical and α6 subunits differ at 6 positions (5 in the extracellular N and C termini, and 1 in TM4). The TM3-TM4 loop, which is not known to affect receptor pharmacology, shows greater divergence (β2 subunits differ by 1 residue, α6 subunits differ by 22). Subunit cDNAs were cloned into a pcDNA3.1(-)-based vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA), linearized, and transcribed using the T7 mMessage mMachine kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City CA). For α1β2γ2 receptors, subunit mRNAs were injected at 0.1 μg/μl (α1 and β2) and 0.05 μg/μl (γ2). For α6β2δ receptors, subunit mRNAs were injected at 1.0 μg/μl (α6 and β2), and 0.5 μg/μl (δ) using a Nanoliter Injector (50.6 nl; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota FL). α1β2γ2 receptors expressed well, while, α6β2δ receptor generally expressed poorly, with many oocytes showing little or no GABA response. Electrophysiology was performed according to standard protocols, as previously described [23]. Cells were voltage clamped at −60 mV. GABA concentration-response curves and 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation curves were fit with the equation:
PS concentration-response curves and 5α, 3α-THDOC inhibition curves were fit using the equation:
where I is current at a given ligand concentration, Imax is current at saturation (for GABA and 5α, 3α-THDOC curves), in the absence of inhibitor (for PS curves), or at the peak of the bell-shaped curve (for 5α, 3α-THDOC inhibition), EC50 and IC50 are the ligand concentrations required to produce half-maximal effect, and n is the slope coefficient. For a subset of the neurosteroid concentration-response curves, it was necessary to constrain the value of n to 1, to achieve a fit that passed through the data points. Linear regression was used where only two data points were available. For each new batch of oocytes, we verified that the previously-determined GABA EC50 concentration produced half of the current produced by saturating GABA. All drugs were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Error presented is SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Student's T test unless otherwise indicated.
Results
Structure and function of mutant GABAA receptors
PS sensitivity of the UNC-49B isoform of the C. elegans GABA receptor can be increased 20 fold by swapping in a 19 amino acid segment from another C. elegans isoform (UNC-49C). Therefore, UNC-49B residues within this segment are associated with PS insensitivity [23]. This segment also contains the residue necessary for neurosteroid potentiation of mammalian GABAA receptors [10] (Fig. 1A). To test how this segment affects neurosteroid inhibition and potentiation of mammalian receptors, we swapped the UNC-49B residues into mammalian GABAA receptor subunits to create chimeric subunits (designated by ‘X’, i.e. α1×) and co-expressed them with wild-type subunits in different combinations. All subunit combinations were functional except those in which the α1 and β2 subunits were both chimeric. Effects on GABA sensitivity (Fig. 1B) were statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) except for substitution of the γ2 subunit, which reduced GABA sensitivity 2.3 fold compared to wild type.
Figure 1.
Sequence, GABA sensitivity, and PS inhibition of GABAA receptors
(A) Amino acid sequences of GABAA receptor subunits and UNC-49 subunits. The swapped TM1 region is indicated by a bar above the residues, the α subunit glutamine necessary for neurosteroid potentiation is indicated with an arrow, and the UNC-49C residues that can be swapped into UNC-49B to alter PS sensitivity are indicated with triangles (black indicates residues that increase UNC-49B PS inhibition, white indicates a residue that reduces PS inhibition of UNC-49B). (B) GABA concentration-response curves for wild-type and chimeric α1β2γ2 receptors (left) and α6β2δ receptors (right; n=4 for α1β2γ2 and α6β2×δ, n=3 for all others). (C) Representative traces of wild-type and chimeric α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors exposed to EC50 GABA alone, or EC50 GABA plus 10 μM PS. Bars above traces indicate duration of drug exposure. (D) PS concentration-response curves for wild-type and chimeric α1β2γ2 receptors. (E) Plot of PS IC50 values for all combinations of wild-type and chimeric α1β2γ2 receptors (* P < 0.05 Student's T test, # P < 0.05 Mann-Whitney test, compared to wild-type).
Neurosteroid sensitivity of α1β2γ2 receptors
To examine modulation by inhibitory and enhancing neurosteroids, PS was applied to oocytes with EC50 GABA, and 5α, 3α-THDOC was applied to oocytes with EC20 GABA. Neurosteroids were pre-applied for 20s to equilibrate binding sites, and to determine whether neurosteroids exerted direct GABA-independent effects. Surprisingly, substituting the UNC-49B TM1 segment caused no reduction of PS sensitivity in the mammalian GABAA receptors in any combination, but instead significantly increased PS sensitivity when substituted into the α1 subunit (P<0.05 for α1×β2γ2 and P=0.05 for α1×β2γ2× compared to wild type; Fig. 1D, E). No direct effects of PS were observed for wild-type or chimeric receptors (Fig. 1C). These results suggest that the importance of the TM1 domain for PS inhibition is shared between C. elegans and mammals, but there are clearly substantial mechanistic differences.
THDOC modulation was also affected by the TM1 substitutions. THDOC produced little direct activation (Fig. 2A), and its modulation of GABA-evoked currents was bell-shaped, with maximal potentiation at 1 μM (Fig. 2B). As expected, α1 chimeras showed markedly reduced 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation at all concentrations (Fig. 2B), because the substituted segment contains a tryptophan residue in place of Q241, already known to correlate with reduced sensitivity [10]. None of the other TM1 substitutions significantly altered the potency of THDOC potentiation or inhibition, or the efficacy of THDOC inhibition compared to wild type (P > 0.05). However, receptors containing chimeric γ2 subunits showed significantly increased efficacy of 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation (P < 0.05). This effect was not observed when the β2 subunits were also chimeric, suggesting that β2 and γ2 subunits together influence neurosteroid potentiation (Fig. 2C).
Figure 2.
5α, 3α-THDOC modulation of α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors
A) Representative traces of wild-type and chimeric α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors exposed to EC20 GABA alone, or EC20 GABA plus 1 μM 5α, 3α-THDOC. (B) Concentration-response plots for 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation of EC20 GABA currents. The bell-shaped concentration-response curves are separated into the rising phase (top plot) and the falling phase (lower plot). The 1.0 μM data point is shown in both plots. (C) Comparison of potentiation by 1 μM 5α, 3α-THDOC of all wild-type and chimeric combinations (n = 6 for each data point, * P < 0.05, # P = 0.05 Mann-Whitney test, compared to wild-type).
Neurosteroid sensitivity of α6β2δ receptors
We also tested the effects of TM1 substitutions in the β2 subunits when expressed with wild-type α6 and δ subunits. Pre-application of PS to wild-type α6β2δ, in the absence of GABA, caused large outward currents (Fig. 3A), consistent with blockade of a chloride leak current. A previous study reported that α6β2δ receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes have a high rate of spontaneous opening, producing a constitutive chloride current that could be inhibited by bicucculine, picrotoxinin, furosemide, and Zn2+ [7]. The outward currents that we observed are consistent with PS inhibition of spontaneous activity. Regardless of the leak current, subsequent application of EC50 GABA to the wild-type or mutant receptors resulted in an inward current (Fig. 3A), and this current was equally sensitive to PS inhibition in the wild-type and chimeric receptors (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3.
Inhibition of α6β2δ receptors by PS and other inhibitors
(A) Representative traces of wild-type α6β2δ and α6β2×δ receptors exposed to EC50 GABA or EC50 GABA plus 10 μM PS. The wild-type, but not the chimera receptor showed large outward currents during preapplication. (B) Concentration-response curve for PS inhibition of GABA-evoked currents from α6β2δ (n=6) and α6β2×δ (n=5) receptors. (C) Magnitude of PS-evoked outward current relative to the EC50 GABA current for selected subunit combinations (α1-containing receptors are also shown for comparison; n ≥ 5 for each data point). (D) Traces from oocytes expressing wild-type α6β2δ receptors exposed to a series of inhibitors: 10 μM PS, 10 μM picrotoxinin, 500 μM furosemide, and 100 μM Zn2+. Each row represents an independent cell; EC50 GABA traces are shown for comparison. (E) Same as D, for α6β2×δ receptor-expressing cells.
Although PS inhibition of GABA-evoked currents was unaffected, the β2 subunit TM1 substitution nearly eliminated the apparent PS-evoked outward current (Fig. 3A, C; P<0.05, Mann-Whitney test). We considered two possible explanations: β2 TM1 substitution might eliminate PS sensitivity of the spontaneous current, or it might eliminate the spontaneous current itself. We therefore tested other inhibitors of α6β2δ receptor spontaneous currents: picrotoxinin, furosemide, and Zn2+ [7]. Like PS, the apparent outward currents produced by these inhibitors were eliminated in α6β2×δ receptors (Fig. 3D, E). Since these compounds are structurally dissimilar and act through different mechanisms, these results strongly suggest that the β2 TM1 substitution eliminates the spontaneous current produced by the α6β2δ receptors.
Finally we compared 5α, 3α-THDOC modulation of wild-type and chimeric α6β2δ receptors. Potentiation and direct activation were observed (Fig. 4A-C). The concentration-response curves for both effects were strongly bell shaped for the α6β2×δ chimera, and tended toward bell shaped for the wild-type receptor, with maximal effects observed in the 1-3 μM range (Fig. 4B, C). At 3 and 10 μM, THDOC was inhibitory, reducing GABA-evoked currents of the chimeric receptor below the levels of GABA alone (Fig. 4C). TM1 substitution in the β2 subunit reduced both direct activation and potentiation at higher 5α, 3α-THDOC concentrations (above 0.3 μM for direct activation, and above 1.0 μM for potentiation). Potentiation of GABA-evoked currents at neurosteroid concentrations below 3.0 μM was unaffected. The efficacy of inhibition at 10 μM 5α, 3α-THDOC was also increased (Fig. 4B, C). These data suggest that the β2 subunit substitution either increases sensitivity to 5α, 3α-THDOC inhibition or reduces sensitivity to 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation and direct activation. In either case, they demonstrate that the β2 subunit TM1 domain is important for the actions of high concentrations of 5α, 3α-THDOC.
Figure 4.
5α, 3α-THDOC direct activation and potentiation of α6β2δ receptors
(A) Wild-type α6β2δ (left) or chimeric α6β2×δ (right) receptors were exposed to EC20 GABA or EC20 GABA plus 1 μM 5α, 3α-THDOC. Concentration-response plots of 5α, 3α-THDOC direct activation (as a proportion of EC20 GABA current; B) and potentiation of EC20 GABA currents (C). As in Fig. 2B, the rising and falling phases of the bell-shaped curves are plotted separately (upper and lower traces, respectively). Statistical significance (wild-type vs. chimera; P < 0.05) is indicated by * (Student's T test) or # (Mann-Whitney test); n = 9 for wild-type, n=3 for chimera.
Discussion
In this study, we manipulated the structure of the TM1 domains of GABAA receptor α1, β2, and γ2 subunits to test whether sequence requirements for PS inhibition of the C. elegans UNC-49B GABA receptor were conserved with mammalian GABAA receptors. We substituted TM1 residues that caused PS insensitivity in UNC-49B into the mammalian subunits, and tested the PS sensitivity of the resulting chimeric receptors. Surprisingly, none of the TM1 substitutions caused the predicted reduction of PS sensitivity in any context, and in one case the mutation increased PS sensitivity. These results are unexpected because residues important for allosteric regulation generally play conserved roles throughout the family of ligand-gated chloride channels. Based on these results, we conclude that the residues identified in the C. elegans receptors are not forming a conserved PS binding pocket, and if they are playing another conserved role, their actions must be dependent upon diverged residues elsewhere in the receptor. One caveat to this interpretation is that in the C. elegans experiments, all five subunits of the pentamer were mutated [23], whereas in this study, either the α1 or β2 subunits needed to be wild type to preserve receptor functionality. However it seems unlikely that the α1 and β2 subunits could be functionally identical and redundant with respect to PS inhibition, considering that their sequences differ at 8 out of 19 residues within the substituted region. Therefore it is also possible that the neurosteroid sites in the C. elegans UNC-49 receptor are significantly diverged from the mammalian sites, and therefore may be valuable as novel targets in the development of new anthelminthics and possibly insecticides with limited toxicity to mammals.
Although this study did not establish a conserved basis for neurosteroid inhibition between mammalian and C. elegans GABAA receptors, several new insights emerged into the action of enhancing neurosteroids. First, 5α, 3α-THDOC potentiation was increased by substituting the γ2 subunit M1 domain, but that the increased potentiation was only seen when the β2 M1 domain was wild-type. This result identifies minor roles for β2 and γ2 subunits in neurosteroid potentiation where previously, only the α1 subunit was shown to be important [9, 10]. Second, chimeric β2 subunits in α6β2×δ receptors conferred reduced sensitivity to 5α, 3α-THDOC direct activation and increased sensitivity to 5α, 3α-THDOC inhibition at concentrations above 1 μM, thus identifying a second site on the β2 subunit that is important for neurosteroid action, at least in this subunit combination. Third, sensitivity to neurosteroid direct activation was also correlated with a high level of spontaneous activity, raising the possibility that neurosteroid-gated channel opening and spontaneous channel opening are mechanistically similar. Finally, we observed no parallel effects of our mutations on the actions of 5α, 3α-THDOC and PS. Consistent with earlier pharmacological studies [6, 19, 27], this finding provides structure-based evidence that the binding sites and mechanisms of enhancing pregnane neurosteroid inhibitory sulfated steroids are separate and distinct.
The most striking effect we observed was the decrease in spontaneous activity of α6β2δ receptors by substitution of the β2 subunit TM1 domain. Spontaneous activity has been observed in several homomeric and heteromeric GABAA receptors in recombinant studies, and is associated with particular subunits such as β1 [20], ε [17], and α6 [7]. Recent studies highlight its potential to regulate neuronal excitability in vivo as well [12]. Residues in the TM2 and TM3 domains are known to affect spontaneous GABAA receptor gating [4, 14, 18]. Our results additionally demonstrate a role for the β2 subunit TM1 domain. Physiologically, these findings are important because they identify another potential role for endogenous PS. α6β2δ receptors are expressed in cerebellar granule cells; their onset of expression during development correlates with motor learning in the cerebellum [25]. α6β2δ receptors are extrasynaptic, and are believed to generate tonic inhibition in proportion to the levels of extrasynaptic GABA that spills over from nearby GABA synapses [3]. The finding that spontaneous activity of α6β2δ receptors may also be inhibited by PS raises the possibility that inhibitory tone may be modulated by PS in both a GABA-dependent and GABA-independent manner. Considering its somewhat specific functional effect (i.e. eliminating spontaneous current in α6β2δ receptors without affecting GABA sensitivity appreciably), the chimeric β2 subunit used in this study may prove useful for further study of structural and physiological aspects of spontaneous activity in extrasynaptic GABAA receptors.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grant NS43345 to B. A. B.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
Carrie Baker, Department of Bioengineering, University of Toledo, 2801 W Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606.
Brianne L. Sturt, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 W Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606
Bruce A. Bamber, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 W Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606
References
- 1.Akk G, Bracamontes J, Steinbach JH. Pregnenolone sulfate block of GABA(A) receptors: mechanism and involvement of a residue in the M2 region of the alpha subunit. J Physiol. 2001;532:673–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0673e.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belelli D, Lambert JJ. Neurosteroids: endogenous regulators of the GABA(A) receptor. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:565–575. doi: 10.1038/nrn1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brickley SG, Revilla V, Cull-Candy SG, Wisden W, Farrant M. Adaptive regulation of neuronal excitability by a voltage-independent potassium conductance. Nature. 2001;409:88–92. doi: 10.1038/35051086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang Y, Weiss DS. Substitutions of the highly conserved M2 leucine create spontaneously opening rho1 gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;53:511–523. doi: 10.1124/mol.53.3.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen L, Cai W, Zhou R, Furuya K, Sokabe M. Modulatory metaplasticity induced by pregnenolone sulfate in the rat hippocampus: A leftward shift in LTP/LTD-frequency curve. Hippocampus. 2009 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haage D, Backstrom T, Johansson S. Interaction between allopregnanolone and pregnenolone sulfate in modulating GABA-mediated synaptic currents in neurons from the rat medial preoptic nucleus. Brain Res. 2005;1033:58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hadley SH, Amin J. Rat alpha6beta2delta GABAA receptors exhibit two distinct and separable agonist affinities. J Physiol. 2007;581:1001–1018. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.132886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Herd MB, Belelli D, Lambert JJ. Neurosteroid modulation of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hosie AM, Clarke L, da Silva H, Smart TG. Conserved site for neurosteroid modulation of GABA A receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hosie AM, Wilkins ME, da Silva HM, Smart TG. Endogenous neurosteroids regulate GABAA receptors through two discrete transmembrane sites. Nature. 2006;444:486–489. doi: 10.1038/nature05324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kokate TG, Juhng KN, Kirkby RD, Llamas J, Yamaguchi S, Rogawski MA. Convulsant actions of the neurosteroid pregnenolone sulfate in mice. Brain Res. 1999;831:119–124. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01287-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McCartney MR, Deeb TZ, Henderson TN, Hales TG. Tonically active GABAA receptors in hippocampal pyramidal neurons exhibit constitutive GABA-independent gating. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;71:539–548. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.028597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mihalek RM, Banerjee PK, Korpi ER, Quinlan JJ, Firestone LL, Mi ZP, Lagenaur C, Tretter V, Sieghart W, Anagnostaras SG, Sage JR, Fanselow MS, Guidotti A, Spigelman I, Li Z, DeLorey TM, Olsen RW, Homanics GE. Attenuated sensitivity to neuroactive steroids in gamma-aminobutyrate type A receptor delta subunit knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:12905–12910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mihic SJ, Ye Q, Wick MJ, Koltchine VV, Krasowski MD, Finn SE, Mascia MP, Valenzuela CF, Hanson KK, Greenblatt EP, Harris RA, Harrison NL. Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABA(A) and glycine receptors. Nature. 1997;389:385–389. doi: 10.1038/38738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mitchell EA, Herd MB, Gunn BG, Lambert JJ, Belelli D. Neurosteroid modulation of GABAA receptors: molecular determinants and significance in health and disease. Neurochem Int. 2008;52:588–595. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morrow AL. Recent developments in the significance and therapeutic relevance of neuroactive steroids--Introduction to the special issue. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Neelands TR, Fisher JL, Bianchi M, Macdonald RL. Spontaneous and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-activated GABA(A) receptor channels formed by epsilon subunit-containing isoforms. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;55:168–178. doi: 10.1124/mol.55.1.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pan ZH, Zhang D, Zhang X, Lipton SA. Agonist-induced closure of constitutively open gamma-aminobutyric acid channels with mutated M2 domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:6490–6495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park-Chung M, Malayev A, Purdy RH, Gibbs TT, Farb DH. Sulfated and unsulfated steroids modulate gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor function through distinct sites. Brain Res. 1999;830:72–87. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01381-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sigel E, Baur R, Trube G, Mohler H, Malherbe P. The effect of subunit composition of rat brain GABAA receptors on channel function. Neuron. 1990;5:703–711. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stell BM, Brickley SG, Tang CY, Farrant M, Mody I. Neuroactive steroids reduce neuronal excitability by selectively enhancing tonic inhibition mediated by delta subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:14439–14444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2435457100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vallee M, Mayo W, Darnaudery M, Corpechot C, Young J, Koehl M, Le Moal M, Baulieu EE, Robel P, Simon H. Neurosteroids: deficient cognitive performance in aged rats depends on low pregnenolone sulfate levels in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:14865–14870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wardell B, Marik PS, Piper D, Rutar T, Jorgensen EM, Bamber BA. Residues in the first transmembrane domain of the Caenorhabditis elegans GABA(A) receptor confer sensitivity to the neurosteroid pregnenolone sulfate. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;148:162–172. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Williamson J, Mtchedlishvili Z, Kapur J. Characterization of the convulsant action of pregnenolone sulfate. Neuropharmacology. 2004;46:856–864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2003.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wisden W, Korpi ER, Bahn S. The cerebellum: a model system for studying GABAA receptor diversity. Neuropharmacology. 1996;35:1139–1160. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(96)00076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu FS, Gibbs TT, Farb DH. Pregnenolone sulfate: a positive allosteric modulator at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1991;40:333–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zaman SH, Shingai R, Harvey RJ, Darlison MG, Barnard EA. Effects of subunit types of the recombinant GABAA receptor on the response to a neurosteroid. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;225:321–330. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90106-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]