Abstract
Salmonella spp. have been extensively incriminated worldwide as common causes of bacterial gastroenteritis in humans, with food-animals serving as important reservoirs. The study was aimed at investigating cattle and pigs slaughtered in Buea as reservoirs of Salmonella Typhimurium and the susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics. In total, 230 specimens (comprising 50 each from the rectum, ileum, and gall bladder of cattle; and 10 each from same anatomical sites of pigs and 50 from abattoir drains) were analyzed for Salmonella using the standard microbiological, biochemical and serological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion test. The isolates were characterized into biotypes using the API 20E kit, and results were analyzed using the chi-square test. Seventy-five (32.6%) of the 230 specimens were positive for S. Typhimurium, with pigs and abattoir drains presenting the highest level of isolation (40%). Biochemical typing grouped the isolates into five biotypes. Biotype I was the most prevalent (30.6%) while biotype IV was the least prevalent (9.3%) and was absent in samples from pigs. Antibio-tic susceptibility studies revealed 14 antibiotypes based on antibiotics used in the study. The predominant antibiotype AMXR DOXRCEFR was recorded in 13 (17.3%) of the isolates. Multidrug resistance (to four or more antibiotics) was recorded in 50.7% (38/75) of the isolates. The most active drugs were ciprofloxacin (98.6%), ofloxacin (93.3%), amikacin (90.6%), and gentamicin (84%). All the isolates (100%) were resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Cattle and pigs were found to be reservoirs of S. Typhimurium in the environment of Buea, Cameroon, implying that foods from these sources, if not properly handled, could serve as vehicles for its transmission to humans.
Key words: Antibiogram; Antibiotic resistance; Biotyping; Drug resistance, Microbial; Gastroenteritis; Salmonella infections; Salmonella Typhimurium; Cameroon
INTRODUCTION
Salmonella enterica, a Gram-negative, non-sporing, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative facultative anaerobic bacilli is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in humans and animals, with multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium being an emerging problem (1–4). Contaminated food of ani-mal origin, particularly meat products from cattle and pigs, is an important source of S. Typhimurium in human infections (5). S. Typhimurium has been described as a collection of variants that vary significantly in their host range and their degree of host adaptation (6). It is the third most common serovar causing human food-poisoning in some parts of the world. As pathogens, they have developed complex virulence mechanisms to evade host defence mechanisms (7). Although the organism does not cause clinical disease in pigs, subclinical infections constitute an important food-safety problem throughout the world (8), and from a consumer viewpoint, continuing efforts are needed to reduce its occurrence in pork.
S. Typhimurium can survive in the environment, and once established on a farm, contamination can be difficult to eradicate. It may spread from farm to farm through exchange of livestock, by wildlife, or in the runoff from fields and can disseminate into food-chains as a consequence of further cross-contamination at slaughter-houses. Due to the ability of Salmonellae to survive in meat and animal products that are not thoroughly cooked or not properly handled, animal products are the main vehicles of salmonellosis (4).
Typing of S. Typhimurium provides information on strain diversity and improves the epidemiological analysis of outbreaks (9,10). Several methods, including biotyping, profiling of antibiotic susceptibility, phage-typing (11), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (12), plasmid profile analysis (13), and various PCR-based techniques have been used for characterizing the organism. However, although phage-typing, PFGE, and PCR-based techniques have a high discriminatory power, they are more complex, cumbersome, and expensive, making these not suitable for routine investigation or for laboratories with limited resources as is common in developing countries. Zhou et al. employed biotyping as an effective means to the investigation and surveillance of S. Typhimurium-associated nosocomial infection (14); their findings demonstrated a link between infection in children and bacteria in hospital environments and carriers of medical staff. In the present study, we employed biotyping and antibiogram previously reported in our laboratory (15) as they offer advantages to smaller laboratories, such as ours, which are not optimally equipped.
The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) serotypes, especially S. Typhimurium definitive phage-type (DT) 104, has become a potential problem for animal husbandry and in human medicine (16–19). Animals infected with antibiotic-resistant Salmonella are an important source of resistance determinants that can transfer to human-infective Salmonella serovars.
Considerable information abounds on distribution of serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella of human and of food-animal origin in other parts of the world (8,20). However, a dearth of information exists on non-typhoidal Salmonella in most parts of Cameroon, including Buea (21). This study was, therefore, carried out to determine the role major food-animals (cattle and pigs) play as reservoirs of S. Typhimurium and also to study the susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics as drug resistance constitutes a serious health concern in this locality (15). This information will be important for obtaining epidemiological insight and for determining appropriate, empirical antimicrobial therapy in both human and veterinary medicines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
In total, 230 specimens were analyzed in the study. Fifty slaughtered cattle were sampled with 50 swabs each collected from the rectum, ileum, and contents of the gall bladder, giving 150 samples; 10 slaughtered pigs were sampled with three samples each collected from the same anatomical sites, such as the cattle for 30 samples; and 50 environmental samples were obtained from the abattoir drains. The samples were collected from different abattoirs, and sample sizes were selected based on convenience. More cattle were slaughtered than pigs in this and other abattoirs in Cameroon. The samples were collected during April-August 2006.
Bacteriological analysis
Specimens were collected and transported to the laboratory in selenite F medium following standard methods (22,23). They were incubated for 24–48 hours at 37 °C. The broth culture was aseptically streaked on Salmonella-Shigella agar (SS) and deoxycholate citrate agar (DCA) plates for the isolation of Salmonella. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18–48 hours, after which they were examined for colonies typical of Salmonella. Suspect colonies were streaked on nutrient agar plates to obtain pure cultures which were subjected to oxidase testing, gram-staining, and motility testing. Gram-negative short-motile rods and non-motile rods with characteristic red slope/yellow butt reaction on TSI either with the production of H2S or not were taken presumptively as Salmonella (22). They were further serotyped using agglutinating antisera (Murex Biotech Ltd., UK) based on the Kauffmann-White scheme as previously reported (24). Isolates were confirmed and classified into biotypes using the analytical profile index (API) 20E kit (Biomérieux SA, Marcy L’ Etiole, France) following the instructions of the manufacturer.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion test, which conforms to the recommended standard of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), formerly National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), was used as previously described (15,25). Briefly, a small inoculum of each pure bacterial isolate was emulsified in 3 mL of sterile normal saline in Bijou bottles, and the density was compared with a barium chloride standard (0.5 McFarland). A sterile cotton swab was dipped into the standardized suspension of bacterial cultures and used to evenly inoculate Mueller-Hinton plates (Biotec, England), and the plates were allowed to dry. Antibiotic discs with the following drug contents: gentamicin (GEN) (10 μg); amikacin (AMK) (10 μg); ciprofloxacin (CIP) (5 μg); ofloxacin (OFX) (10 μg); cefotaxime (CFT) (30 μg); ceftazidine (CEF) (30 μg); ampicillin (AMP) (10 μg); amoxicillin (AMX) (5 μg); tetracycline (TET) (30 μg); doxycycline (DOX) (10 μg); co-trimoxazole (SXT) (25 μg); chloramphenicol (Chl) (30 μg) (Antibiotic Becton, Dickson and Company, Sparks, USA; Le Point de Claix, France) were placed at least 15 mm apart and from the edge of the plates to prevent the overlapping of the inhibition zones. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours, and the diameters of zones of inhibition were compared with recorded diameters of the control organism E. coli ATCC 25922 to determine the susceptibility or resistance of isolates to various drugs. These antibiotics were chosen based on the prescription practices for Salmonella in this locality and from the literature (16).
Statistical analysis
The chi-square test was employed to compare the prevalence in the different anatomical sites and biotypes. The differences were considered significant at p<0.05.
RESULTS
Prevalence of S. Typhimurium
Of the 230 specimens analyzed, 75 (32.6%) were positive for S. Typhimurium. Samples from pigs and abattoir drains recorded a prevalence of 40% each while 28.7% was obtained from cattle (Table 1). The rectum had the highest isolation rate for cattle (41.9%) and pigs (58.3%) while the ileum had the least. There was, however, no significant difference (p>0.05) in the distribution of the organism in the different anatomic sites of animals.
Table 1.
Prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium in samples
| Isolation of pathogen | Sources of samples (n=230) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle (n=150) |
Pigs (n=30) |
Abattoir (n=50) |
||||||||
| Rectum | Ileum | Gall bladder | Total | Rectum | Ileum | Gall bladder | Total | Drain | Total | |
| No. positive | 18 | 11 | 14 | 43 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 20 | 75 |
| % positive | 41.9 | 25.6 | 32.6 | 28.7 | 58 | 16.6 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 32.6 |
Characterization of isolates
All the isolates were Gram-negative, motile, short rods which were oxidase-negative with a typical red slope/yellow butt reaction in triple sugar iron (alkaline slope/acid butt) with the production of high amounts of hydrogen sulphide and gas. These isolates were taken presumptively as S. enterica. Confirmation was based on API 20E reactions and polyvalent antisera.
Biochemical characterization of the isolates resulted in five biotype patterns (I-V). Biotype I (30.7%) and II (26.7%) were the more prevalent while biotype IV (9.3%) was the least. An interesting finding was that biotype IV was isolated from cattle and abattoir drains but not from pigs. The major difference between biotype IV and other biotypes was the use of inositol, in which only biotype IV was observed to use this sugar. However, biotype I, III, and V were more frequently isolated from pigs compared to the other biotypes. There was no significant (p>0.05) difference in the distribution of biotypes. All biotypes from cattle also occurred in drains, indicating a probable link between biotypes from these sources.
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Susceptibility testing of isolates to 12 antimicrobial agents (Table 2) indicated that the quinolones (ciprofloxacin–98.6%; ofloxacin–93.3%) and the aminoglycosides (amikacin–90.6%; gentamycin–84%) were the most active drugs against the isolates. Tetracycline (100%) and ampicillin (100%), however, were the most resistant drugs. Marked resistance was also noted for amoxicillin (90.7%), doxycycline (68%), and co-trimoxazole (61.4%). Multidrug resistance was a common phenomenon observed with 38 (50.7%) of the 75 isolates. Fourteen antibiotic resistance patterns were obtained (Table 3). The predominant antibiotypes AMXRDOXRCEFR (amoxycillin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone) and AMXRChlRDOXRSXTRCAZR (amoxycillin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, co-trimoxazole, ceftazidine) were obtained from 13 (17.3%) and 10 (13.3%) of the isolates respectively. The least encountered patterns were AMXRChlR (amoxycillin, chloramphenicol), CAZRCEFRAMKRAMXRGENR (ceftazidine, ceftriaxone, amikacin, amoxycillin, gentamicin), CIPRCAZRCEFRSXTRChlRGENR (ciprofloxacin, ceftazidine, ceftriazone, co-trimoxazole, chloramphenicol, gentamicin), CEFRCAZRSXTRAMXRAMKRChlR (ceftriaxone, ceftazidine, co-trimoxazole, amoxycillin, amikacin, chloramphenicol) as only one isolate each exhibited these patterns.
Table 2.
Antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates
| Drug | Susceptible |
Resistant |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 74 | 98.6 | 1 | 13 |
| Ofloxacin | 70 | 93.3 | 5 | 6.7 |
| Amikacin | 68 | 90.6 | 7 | 9.4 |
| Gentamicin | 63 | 84.0 | 12 | 1.6 |
| Ceftazidine | 50 | 66.6 | 25 | 33.4 |
| Ceftriaxone | 37 | 49.3 | 38 | 50.7 |
| Tetracycline | 0 | 0.0 | 75 | 100 |
| Doxycycline | 24 | 32.0 | 51 | 68 |
| Ampicillin | 0 | 0.0 | 75 | 100 |
| Amoxycillin | 7 | 9.3 | 68 | 90.7 |
| Co-trimoxazole | 29 | 38.6 | 46 | 61.4 |
| Chloramphenicol | 38 | 50.6 | 37 | 49.4 |
Table 3.
Antibiotypes of Salmonella Typhimurium
| No. | Antibiotype | Strains |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | ||
| A1 | AMX RChlR | 1 | 1.3 |
| A2 | DOXR ChlR | 4 | 5.3 |
| A3 | AMXR DOXR CEFR | 13 | 17.3 |
| A4 | AMXR SXTR DOXR | 9 | 12.0 |
| A5 | AMXR ChlR SXTR | 8 | 10.7 |
| A6 | DOXR ChlR CEFR | 2 | 2.7 |
| A7 | AMXR DOXR ChlR CEFR | 8 | 10.7 |
| A8 | OFXRAMKRGENRSXTRAMXR | 5 | 6.7 |
| A9 | AMXRChlRDOXRSXTRCAZR | 10 | 13.3 |
| A10 | AMXRCEFRCAZRSXTRAMKR | 5 | 6.7 |
| A11 | CAZRCEFRAMKRAMXRGENR | 1 | 1.3 |
| A12 | CAZRCEFRSXTRDOXRAMXR | 7 | 9.3 |
| A13 | CIPRCAZRCEFRSXTRChlRGENR | 1 | 1.3 |
| A14 | CEFRCAZRSXTRAMXRAMKRChlR | 1 | 1.3 |
| Total | 14 | 75 | |
AMK=Amikacin; AMX=Amoxycilin; CAZ=Ceftazidine; CEF=Ceftriaxone; Chl=Chloramphenicol; CIP=Ciprofloxacin; DOX=Doxycycline; GEN=Gentamicin; OFX=Ofloxacin; SXT=Co-trimoxazole
DISCUSSION
S. Typhimurium is a well-known zoonotic pathogen causing diarrhoea, pyrexia, and septicaemia in animals and humans. Non-typhoid Salmonella serovars remain a potential threat to human health, and beef cattle and broiler chickens are possible sources of these organisms in the environment (4). Although non-typhoidal salmonellosis in humans is usually a self-limiting disease confined to the intestinal tract, when infections spread beyond the intestine, or when immunocompromised persons are affected, it may have serious consequences requiring appropriate antimicrobial treatment. In animals, such symptoms can be lethal; so, prompt treatment with appropriate antimicrobial agents remains economically important. Hence, the surveillance of antimicrobial resistant strains is necessary for effective treatment and prediction of occurrence of resistant populations of prevailing biotypes. The public-health measures to reduce chances of infection, thus, take into consideration the presence of the organism in animals (26,27). This study was, therefore, conducted to determine the biotypes and antibiogram of S. Typhimurium isolated from slaughtered food-animals (cattle and pigs) in Buea, Cameroon, where no such data exist.
S. Typhimurium was isolated from samples with a prevalence of 32.6%. The distribution pattern was similar in both species of animals sampled where the organism was more frequently isolated from the rectum (41.9% and 58.3% from cattle and pigs res-pectively) (Table 1). The ileum of both animals had the least occurrence of the organism. We associate our findings to the fact that these animals shed the organism in faeces when placed under stress during slaughter (28). Thus, rectal swabbing offers an easy method of surveying the carrier rate of a specific herd. There was, however, no significant difference (p>0.05) in the distribution of the organism in the anatomical sites of animals. The high prevalence of Salmonella in these animals could result from consumption of contaminated feed (29,30), or grazing plants that may have been contaminated through fertilization with untreated effluents or sludge.
Classical biotyping characterizes strains by creating profiles for a set of biochemical tests. Previous studies employed biotyping as a marker for assessing the widespread outbreak of S. Typhimurium-associated infections (31,32). In our study, biotyping grouped isolates into five biotypes. Biotype I (30.6%) and II (26.7%) were the most frequently encountered. We observed a relationship between cattle and abattoir drains as all biotypes found in cattle were also obtained from drains. During slaughtering, the organisms are washed from cattle to open drains, and since the effluent is not properly disposed of, it may serve as a source for dissemination. Although we did not detect biotype IV in samples from porcine sources, we cannot declare the complete absence of this biotype from these sources as only a few swines were sampled due to a limited number of slaughtered swines in this locality and generally in abattoirs in Cameroon. In addition, although S. Typhimurium serotypes have been thought of as the prototypical broad-host-range serotypes, certain variants have been shown to have a narrow host range (6). We, therefore, speculate that the biotype IV could have a narrow host range. All other biotypes were present in all samples analyzed.
Epidemiological surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant S. Typhimurium has become necessary for effective treatment and prediction of occurrence of resistant populations. Antibiogram of the isolates revealed marked susceptibility of isolates to quinolones—ciprofloxacin (98%) and ofloxacin (93.3%) (Table 2). Our results corroborate the findings of Esaki et al. (33) and Kawagoe et al. (20) who recently reported a marked susceptibility of S. Typhimurium to flouroquinolones that could be used in the treatment of infections caused by this organism. The high cost of these drugs in the study area discourages its over-use and may account for our observation of low antimicrobial resistance. Other active agents observed were the aminoglycosides—gentamicin (84%) and amikacin (90.6%). However, Kawagoe et al. recently reported resistance to these drugs in S. Typhimurium isolates from food-producing animals in Japan (20). We may not be certain as to these discrepancies but speculate that it may be related to differing prescription practices in these localities. It is noteworthy that all the isolates exhibited complete resistance (100%) to tetracycline and ampicillin. Esaki et al. reported complete resistance to ampicillin, dihydrostreptomycin, oxytetracycline, and chloramphenicol in DT104 and 104B S. Typhimurium (33). A marked resistance was also observed to doxycycline (68%) and amoxycillin (90.7%). Their use may result in treatment failure. Although we reported a resistance of 49.4% to chloramphenicol, its veterinary use for food-animals has been prohibited in some countries.
Multidrug resistance was a common phenomenon in this study, being observed in 38 (50.7%) of the 75 isolates. Fourteen distinct resistance patterns (antibiotypes) were observed. Pattern AMXRDOXRCEFR was the most prevalent (17.3%) while CAZRCEFRAMKRChlRGENR, CIPRCAZRCEFRSXTRChlRGENR, CEFRCAZRSXTROFXRAMKRChlR, and AMXRChlR were the least common (1.3%) (Table 3). The frequency of isolation of S. Typhimurium DT104 in food-animals worldwide has increased because of its spread and recent reports (20,34) on changes in resistance phenotype, or phage-type in MDR S. Typhimurium underscores the need for continuous monitoring of susceptibility pattern of S. Typhimurium from food-animals. Our findings of high levels of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in slaughtered cattle and pigs and in the environment highlight the potential risk of S. Typhimurium DT 104, with multidrug resistance becoming established in Cameroon. Thus, routine investigations at a national level for drug-resistant S. Typhimurium in food-animals and prudent use of antimicrobials remain a high priority. Frequent surveillance to track changes in the susceptibility pattern of the organism in the study area is, therefore, advocated.
In conclusion, our results indicate that cattle and pigs could serve as reservoirs of S. Typhimurium in Buea, Cameroon and provide information on selection of antimicrobial therapy for infections due to S. Typhimurium in food-animals and for treatment of infections from these food sources. We advocate an urgent need for an organized Salmonella surveillance system that reports resistance patterns of S. enterica serotypes circulating in Cameroon.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was partly funded by the University of Buea, Cameroon. The authors are grateful for the collaboration received from the management of the Buea abattoir where samples were collected. Finally, the authors thank Mr. Monika Stephen for secretarial assistance.
REFERENCES
- 1.Yan SS, Pendrak ML, Abela-Ridder B, Punderson JW, Fedorka DP, Foley SL. An overview of Salmonella typing: public health perspectives. Clin Appl Immunol Rev. 2004;4:189–204. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hendriksen SWM, Orsel K, Wagenaar JA, Miko A, Van Duijkeren E. Animal-to-human transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium DT104A variant. Emer Infect Dis. 2004;10:2225–7. doi: 10.3201/eid1012.040286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith-Palmer A, Stewart WC, Mather H, Greig A, Cowden JM, Reilly WJ. Epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium in animals and people in Scotland between 1990 and 2001. J Vet Rec. 2003;153:517–20. doi: 10.1136/vr.153.17.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abouzeed YM, Hariharan H, Poppe C, Kibenge FSB. Characterization of Salmonella isolates from beef cattle, broiler chickens and human source on Prince Edward Island. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;23:253–66. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9571(99)00079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Evans S, Davies R. Case control study of multiple-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 infection of cattle in Great Britain. Vet Rec. 1996;139:557–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rabsch W, Andrews HL, Kingsley RA, Prager R, Tschäpe pe, Adams LG, Bäumler AJ. Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium and its host-adapted variants. Infect Immun. 2002;70:2249–55. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.5.2249-2255.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Casadevall A, Pirofski L. Host-pathogen interaction: the attributes of virulence. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:337–44. doi: 10.1086/322044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kranker S, Alban L, Boes J, Dahl J. Longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium infection in three Danish farrow-to-finish swine herds. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2282–8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2282-2288.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murase T, Yamada M, Muto T, Matsushima A, Yamai S. Fecal excretion of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium following a food-borne outbreak. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3495–7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.9.3495-3497.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Torpdahl M, Sørensen Rensen, Lindstedt B-A, Nielsen EM. Tandem repeat analysis for surveillance of human Salmonella Typhimurium infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:388–95. doi: 10.3201/eid1303.060460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anderson ES, Ward LR, Saxe MJ, de Sa JD. Bacteriophage-typing designations of Salmonella typhimurium. J Hyg (London) 1977;78:297–300. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400056187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Corbett-Feeney G, Riain UN. The use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for subdivision of Salmo nella typhimurium in an outbreak situation. J Infect. 1998;36:175–7. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(98)80009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Threlfall EJ, Rowe B, Ferguson JL, Ward LR. Characterization of plasmids conferring resistance to gentamicin and apramycin in strains of Salmonella typhimurium phage type 204c isolated in Britain. J Hyg (London) 1986;97:419–26. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou G, Ru W, Liao Y. The application of Salmonella typhimurium biotyping method to the epidemiological surveys and surveillance. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1998;19:221–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ndip RN, Dilonga HM, Ndip LM, Akoachere JFK, Nkuo-Akenji T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from clinical and environmental samples in Buea, Cameroon: current status on biotyping and antibiogram. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:74–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Besser TE, Goldoft M, Pritchett LC, Khakhria R, Hancock DD, Rice DH, et al. Multiresistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 infections of humans and domestic animals in Pacific Northwest of the United States. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;124:193–200. doi: 10.1017/s0950268899003283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Butaye P, Michael GB, Schwarz S, Barrett TJ, Brisabois A, White DG. The clonal spread of multidrug-resistant non-typhi Salmonella serotypes. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1891–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arlet G, Barrett TJ, Butaye P, Cloeckaert A, Mulvey MR, White DG. Salmonella resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins: prevalence and epidemiology. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1945–54. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weinberger M, Keller N. Recent trends in the epidemiology of non-typhoid Salmonella and antimicrobial resistance: the Israeli experience and worldwide review. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005;18:513–21. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000186851.33844.b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kawagoe K, Mine H, Asai T, Kojima A, Ishihara K, Harada K, et al. Changes in mult-drug resistance pattern in Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar typhimurium isolates from food-producing animals in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69:1211–3. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nkuo-Akenji TK, Ntemgwa ML, Ndip RN. Asymptomatic salmonellosis and drug susceptibility in Buea District, Cameroon. Cent Afr J Med. 2001;47:254–7. doi: 10.4314/cajm.v47i11.8626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheesbrough M. Cheesbrough M, editor. District laboratory practice in tropical countries, pt 2. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Microbiological tests. Chapter 7; pp. 9–267. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Winn WC, Jr., Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberger P, et al. Koneman's Colour atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. The Enterobacteriaceae. pp. 211–303. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Santos FB, Dsouza DH, Jaykus L, Ferket PR, Sheldon BW. Genotypes, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella isolated from commercial North Carolina turkey farms. J Food Prot. 2007;70:1328–33. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.6.1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Skov MN, Andersen JS, Aabo S, Ethelberg S, Aarestrup FM, Sørensen AH, et al. Antimicrobial drug resistance of Salmonella isolates from meat and humans, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:638–41. doi: 10.3201/eid1304.060748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Woldemarian E, Molla B, Alemayehu D, Muckle A. Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in apparently healthy slaughtered sheep and goat in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Small Rumin Res. 2005;58:19–24. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hume ME, Edrington TS, Looper ML, Callaway TR, Genovese KJ, Nisbet DJ. Salmonella genotype diversity in nonlactating and lactating diary cows. J Food Protect. 2004;67:2280–3. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.10.2280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kidd RS, Rossignol AM, Gamroth MJ. Salmonella and other Enterobacteriaceae in diary-cow feed ingredients: antimicrobial resistance in western Oregon. J Environ Health. 2002;64:9–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Davies RH, Dalziel R, Gibbens JC, Wilesmith JW, Ryan JM, Evans SJ, et al. National survey for Salmo nella in pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter in Great Britain (1999–2000) J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96:750–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ishiguro N, Sato G. Biotyping of Salmonella typhimurium strains isolated from animals and birds in northern Japan. Am J Vet Res. 1981;42:896–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Allos G, Vieu JF, Najat K, Ghassan I. Biotypes of Salmonella typhimurium in Iraq. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1984;77:284–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Esaki H, Morioka A, Ishihara K, Kojima A, Shiroki S, Tamura Y, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from cattle, swine and poultry (2001–2002): report from the Japanese Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53:266–70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wedel SD, Bender JB, Leano FT, Boxrud DJ, Hedberg C, Smith KE. Antimicrobial-drug susceptibility of human and animal Salmonella typhimurium, Minnesota, 1997–2003. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1899–906. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.050158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
