Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Sep 1;132(34):11884–11886. doi: 10.1021/ja104956s

Chiral Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Allylboration of Aldehydes

Pankaj Jain 1, Jon C Antilla 1,*
PMCID: PMC2928988  NIHMSID: NIHMS227568  PMID: 20690662

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms227568u1.jpg

The catalytic enantioselective allylation of aldehydes is a long-standing problem with considerable interest to the chemical community. We wish to disclose a new high yielding and highly enantioselective chiral Brønsted acid-catalyzed allylboration of aldehydes. The reaction is shown to be highly general, with broad substrate scope that covers aryl, heteroaryl, α,β-unsaturated, and aliphatic aldehydes. The reaction conditions were also shown to be effective for the catalytic enantioselective crotylation of aldehydes. We believe that the high reactivity of the allyl boronate is due to protonation of the boronate oxygen by the chiral phosphoric acid catalyst.


The asymmetric allylboration of aldehydes has been an invaluable tool for the formation of carbon-carbon bonds with control over relative and absolute stereochemistry.1 The foundation to this reaction was provided by Hoffmann’s recognition of the diastereospecificity of the reaction when using both E- and Z- crotylboronates2a–c and Brown’s highly stereoselective allylborations using pinene-derived chiral reagents.2d–f Over the past three decades additional methodology that has relied upon stoichiometric chiral reagents or mediators have included work by Roush,3a–c Masamune,3d Corey,3e Seebach,3f Duthaler,3g Panek,3h Leighton,3i–j Chong,3k Soderquist,3l,m and Aggarwal.3n Catalytic methods have also emerged, and these include, in part, work by Yamamoto,4a Umani-Ronchi,4b Keck,4c Denmark1b,4d and others.4e–f Also, recent catalytic allylborations by Hall,5a–g Miyaura,5h Shibasaki5i and Schaus5j–k have opened new doors for the synthesis of homoallyl alcohols. However, most stereoselective methods are limited by one or more drawbacks. These include the use of stoichiometric chiral inductors, allylation reagents that are difficult to prepare or are air/moisture sensitive, the use of undesirable metal-based catalysts such as tin, or substrates leading to toxic byproducts. Hence, the search continues for a competent, catalytic, and practical solution for the direct enantioselective synthesis of homoallylic alcohols; an important class of versatile intermediates used in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals and natural products.1a

Binaphthyl derived chiral phosphoric acids (PA) have been shown to be versatile and efficient catalysts that promote a variety of enantioselective transformations. Chiral PA catalysts have found success in a large number of carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond forming processes along with a variety of oxidation and reduction reactions.6 Although chiral PA-catalyzed reactions involving aldehydes are very rare7,8 we investigated the enantioselective synthesis of homoallylic alcohols by reacting aldehydes with allylboronic acid pinacol ester 2 using chiral acid-catalyzed conditions. Boronate 2 is a relatively stable, nontoxic, commercially available reagent so it was an ideal choice for our evaluation of the chemistry.

During the initial investigations leading to a catalytic reaction between benzaldehyde and 2, (R)-TRIP-PA (4) was found to be a very effective promoter.9 Upon solvent screening we found that toluene, m-xylene, benzene and methylene chloride were effective for the asymmetric synthesis of alcohol 3a (Table 1). It was determined that toluene was the most suitable solvent, allowing for a 93% ee of 3a at room temperature in a 1 hour reaction time (entry 8). The enantioselectivity was further improved by reducing the temperature to 0 °C (96% ee, entry 9) and −30 °C (98% ee, entry 10) in presence of 5 mol % of the catalyst. It was fascinating to find that lowering the catalyst loading to 2.5 mol % allowed for a 97% ee (entry 11) and further lowering to 1 mol % (entry 12) still allowed for an impressive 95% enantioselectivity.

Table 1.

Optimization of the catalytic allylboration of aldehydesa

graphic file with name nihms227568u2.jpg
entry solvent time (h) yield (%)b ee (%)c
1 ether 16 99 35
2 DCM 16 99 88
3 THF 48 51 6
4 m-xylene 48 99 89
5 EtOAc 24 76 29
6 CH3CN 48 55 33
7 benzene 2 99 92
8 toluene 1 99 93
9 toluened 4 99 96
10 toluenee 16 99 98
11 toluenee,f 16 99 97
12 toluenee,g 16 99 95
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.10 mmol), 2 (0.12 mmol), 5 mol % (R)-TRIP-PA, unless otherwise specified.

b

Isolated yield.

c

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.

d

Reaction conducted at 0 °C.

e

Reaction conducted at −30 °C.

f

2.5 mol % catalyst used.

g

1 mol % of catalyst used.

The optimized reaction conditions were effective in promoting the asymmetric allylboration of a wide range of aldehydes, allowing for an extremely efficient reaction (Table 2). The substrate scope extended to electron-rich and electron-poor aromatic aldehydes (entries 1–11). An ester functional group was tolerated in the chemistry (entry 8) and also several hindered aldehydes were effectively allylated (entries 7, 9 and 10). We were particularly pleased to find that heteroaryl (entry 12), α,β-unsaturated aldehydes (entries 13 and 14) and aliphatic aldehydes (entries 15 and 16) were found to be allylated efficiently with high enantioselectivity. The only limits on enantioselectivity were found upon further evaluation of aliphatic aldehydes (entries 17 and 18).

Table 2.

Asymmetric allylboration of aldehydesa

graphic file with name nihms227568u3.jpg
entry R product yield (%)b ee (%)c
1 Ph 3a 99 98d
2 4-ClC6H4 3b 98 99
3 4-BrC6H4 3c 99 99
4 4-NO2C6H4 3d 98 98
5 4-MeOC6H4 3e 95 98
6 3-MeOC6H4 3f 96 97
7 2-MeC6H4 3g 97 93
8 4-CO2MeC6H4 3h 96 96
9 1-naphthyl 3i 93 98
10 9-anthryl 3j 94 91
11 piperonyl 3k 98 98
12 2-thienyl 3l 91 96e
13 graphic file with name nihms227568t1.jpg 3m 94 96
14 graphic file with name nihms227568t2.jpg 3n 93 93
15 Bn 3o 98 90
16 PhCH2CH2 3p 96 87e
17 BnOCH2 3q 92 79e
18 c-C6H11 3r 98 73
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.10 mmol), 2 (0.12 mmol), 5 mol % (R)-TRIP-PA.

b

Isolated yield.

c

The products were determined to be (R) by chiral HPLC analysis and optical rotation data in the literature.

d

With (S)-TRIP-PA the opposite enantiomer (S) of 3a was also obtained in 98% yield and 97% ee under otherwise identical conditions.

e

In three cases the opposite (S) enantiomer was in excess using the (R)-TRIP-PA catalyst.

We believe these examples represent the first case where a chiral Brønsted acid activates allyl boronate esters, in the absence of a Lewis acid, in a highly enantioselective catalytic process.10

We were very pleased to find that (R)-TRIP-PA also promoted the crotylboration of benzaldehyde with high diastereo- and enantioselectivities (Table 3). Use of (E)-crotyl boronate 5a provided the anti-isomer 6a exclusively with 96% ee at room temperature (entry 1) and >99% ee at 0 °C (entry 2) using the general reaction conditions. When employing the (Z)-crotyl boronate 5b the syn-isomer 6b was obtained exclusively with 94% ee at −30 °C.

Table 3.

Asymmetric crotylboration of benzaldehydea

graphic file with name nihms227568u4.jpg
entry R1 R2 temp 6a : 6bb yield (%)c ee (%)d
1 CH3 H rt 2 : 98 96 96
2 CH3 H 0 °C 2 : 98 96 99
3 H CH3 −30 °C 98 : 2 95 94
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.10 mmol), 2 (0.12 mmol), 5 mol % (R)-TRIP-PA.

b

Determined by 1H NMR.

c

Isolated yield.

d

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.

Although the reaction mechanism for this interesting activation has yet to be investigated by our laboratory, the observed diastereoselectivity in the crotylation strongly suggests that the allylboration proceeds via a type I mechanism involving a chair-like six-membered cyclic transition state similar to previous uncatalyzed reactions involving allyl boronates.11 Recent work by Hall5f–g and Schaus,5k suggest that activation by protonation of the boronate oxygen could be involved. Similarly, Lewis acid promoted boronate activation has also been previously invoked.5b As the basis to a working hypothesis, we also propose that activation via protonation of the boronate oxygen by the chiral phosphoric catalyst would provide a reasonable explanation for the reactivity (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A plausible transition state assembly for chiral phosphoric-acid allylation of aldehydes.

In conclusion we have developed a simple and highly efficient chiral phosphoric acid catalyzed allylboration of aldehydes. The protocol provides a highly enantioselective method for the synthesis of homoallylic alcohols from simple starting materials. The usefulness of this organocatalytic reaction is highlighted by the stability and commercial availability of the substrates and the catalyst. This work also has the potential of opening new vistas for chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed activation that was not previously evident. Mechanistic investigations and theoretical considerations are in progress and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Institute of Health (NIH GM-082935) and the National Science Foundation CAREER program (NSF-0847108) for financial support. We also thank Tao Liang for preparation of the catalyst and Matthew J. Kaplan for helpful suggestions.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and spectral data. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Lachance H, Hall DG. Org React. 2008;73:1. [Google Scholar]; (b) Denmark SE, Fu J. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2763. doi: 10.1021/cr020050h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Denmark SE, Almstead NG. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemisry. Otera J, editor. Chapter 10. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2000. p. 299. [Google Scholar]; (d) Chemler SR, Roush WR. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemisry. Otera J, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. p. 403. [Google Scholar]; (e) Yamamoto Y, Asao N. Chem Rev. 1993;93:2207. [Google Scholar]; (f) Roush WR. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, editor. Vol. 2. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991. p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Hoffmann RW, Ladner W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979;20:4653. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hoffmann RW, Zeiss HJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1979;18:306. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hoffmann RW, Zeiss HJ. J Org Chem. 1981;46:1309. [Google Scholar]; (d) Brown HC, Jadhav PK. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:2092. [Google Scholar]; (e) Brown HC, Bhat KS. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:293. [Google Scholar]; (f) Ramachandran PV. Aldrichimica Acta. 2002;35:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Selected examples of chirally modified allyl reagents: Roush WR, Walts AE, Hoong LK. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:8186.Chen M, Handa M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14602. doi: 10.1021/ja904599h.Kister J, DeBaillie AC, Lira R, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14175. doi: 10.1021/ja905494c.Short RP, Masamune S. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:1892.Corey EJ, Yu CM, Kim SS. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:5495.Seebach D, Beck AK, Imwinkelzied R, Roggo S, Wonnacott A. Helv Chim Acta. 1987;70:954.Riediker M, Duthaler RO. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. Vol. 28. 1989. p. 494.Panek JS, Yang M. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:6594.Kinnaird IWA, Ng PY, Kubota K, Wang X, Leighton JL. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:7920. doi: 10.1021/ja0264908.Hackman BM, Lombardi PJ, Leighton JL. Org Lett. 2004;6:4375. doi: 10.1021/ol0480731.Wu TR, Shen L, Chong JM. Org Lett. 2004;6:2701. doi: 10.1021/ol0490882.Burgos CH, Canales E, Matos K, Soderquist JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8044. doi: 10.1021/ja043612i.Gonzalez AZ, Roman IG, Alicea E, Canales E, Soderquist JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:1269. doi: 10.1021/ja808360z.Althaus M, Mahmood A, Suarez JR, Thomas SP, Aggarwal VK. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4025. doi: 10.1021/ja910593w.
  • 4.(a) Furuta K, Mouri M, Yamamoto H. Synlett. 1991:561. [Google Scholar]; (b) Costa AL, Piazza MG, Tagliavini E, Trombini C, Umani-Ronchi A. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:7001. [Google Scholar]; (c) Keck GE, Tarbet KH, Geraci LS. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:8467. [Google Scholar]; (d) Denmark SE, Fu J. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:9488. doi: 10.1021/ja016552e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Malkov A, Orsini M, Pernazza D, Muir KW, Langer V, Meghani P, Kocovsky P. Org Lett. 2002;4:1047. doi: 10.1021/ol025654m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Kim IS, Ngai M, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14891. doi: 10.1021/ja805722e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Kennedy JWJ, Hall DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:11586. doi: 10.1021/ja027453j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rauniyar V, Hall DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4518. doi: 10.1021/ja049446w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yu SH, Ferguson MJ, McDonald R, Hall DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:12808. doi: 10.1021/ja054171l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Rauniyar V, Hall DG. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:2426. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Hall DG. Synlett. 2007. p. 1644. [Google Scholar]; (f) Rauniyar V, Zhai H, Hall DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:8481. doi: 10.1021/ja8016076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Rauniyar V, Hall DG. J Org Chem. 2009;74:4236. doi: 10.1021/jo900553f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Ishiyama T, Ahiko T-A, Miyaura N. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:12414. doi: 10.1021/ja0210345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Wada R, Oisaki K, Kanai M, Shibasaki M. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8910. doi: 10.1021/ja047200l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Lou S, Moquist PN, Schaus SE. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:12660. doi: 10.1021/ja0651308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Barnett DS, Moquist PN, Schaus SE. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:8679. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For reviews see: Akiyama T. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5744. doi: 10.1021/cr068374j.Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5173. doi: 10.1021/cr068373r.Terada M. Chem Commun. 2008:4097. doi: 10.1039/b807577h.
  • 7.(a) Terada M, Soga K, Momiyama N. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:4122. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Momiyama N, Tabuse H, Terada M. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12882. doi: 10.1021/ja904749x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sun FL, Zeng M, Gu Q, You S-L. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:8709. doi: 10.1002/chem.200901369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.For selected Bronsted acid activation of carbonyl compunds other than phosphoric acids see: Huang Y, Unni AK, Thadani AN, Rawal VH. Nature. 2003;424:146. doi: 10.1038/424146a.Nakashima D, Yamamoto H. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9626. doi: 10.1021/ja062508t.Rueping M, Nachtsheim BJ, Moreth SA, Bolte M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:593. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703668.Rueping M, Ieawsuwan W, Antonchick AP, Nachtsheim BJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:2097. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604809.
  • 9.Please see the Supporting Information for details on catalyst screening. Both enantiomers of TRIP-PA (R and S) are commercially available or easily prepared from BINOL using a literature procedure: Hoffmann S, Seayad A, List B. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44:7424. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503062.
  • 10.The most notable comparison is the work by Hall (ref. 5c–5g) which uses a combination of a chiral diol/tin (IV) chloride, generating a Lewis acid/Brønsted acid-catalyzed allylboration.
  • 11.(a) Yang JE. Six-Membered Transition States in Organic Synthesis. Chapter 3. John Wiley and Sons, Inc; Hoboken, New Jersey: 2008. pp. 97–146. [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Y, Houk KN. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:1236. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES