Abstract
Background
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a common opportunistic infection among patients with AIDS and still causes visual morbidity despite the wide spread usage of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The ubiquitous CMV pathogen contains a human interleukin-10 (IL-10) homolog in its genome and utilizes it to evade host immune reactions through an IL-10 receptor mediated immune-suppression pathway.
Methods
Effects of IL-10R1, IL-10 and previously described AIDS restriction gene variants are investigated on the development of CMV retinitis in the Longitudinal Study of the Ocular Complications of AIDS (LSOCA) cohort (n=1284).
Results
In Europen Americans (n=750), a haplotype carrying an amino acid changing variation in the cytoplasmic domain (S420L) of IL-10R1 can be protective (OR = 0.14, CI: 0.02–0.94, P = 0.04) against, whereas another haplotype carrying an amino acid changing variation in the extracellular domain (I224V) of IL-10R1 can be more susceptible (OR = 6.21, CI: 1.22–31.54, P = 0.03) to CMV retinitis. In African Americans (n=534), potential effects of IL-10 variants are observed.
Conclusion
Host genetics may have a role in the occurrence of CMV retinitis in patients infected with HIV.
Keywords: AIDS, CMV retinitis, HIV-1, host genetics, interleukin-10 receptor
INTRODUCTION
Human cytomegaloviruses (HCMVs) are ubiquitous β-herpes virus pathogens that infect 80% of the US adults by age 40 usually with little or no clinical symptoms. However, in neonates, allogenic transplant recipients and immunocompromised people such as patients with AIDS, HCMV is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality [1]. Even after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HCMV continues to be one of the most frequent opportunistic pathogens in patients with AIDS [2].
CMV retinitis was the main reason (>90%) of vision loss among patients with AIDS in the pre-HAART era [3, 4]. Although immune recovery in response to HAART reduced the incidence of CMV retinitis cases, the expected decline in the number of new cases of CMV retinitis has leveled off [2]. CMV retinitis related visual morbidity continues to be a problem in the era of HAART due to HAART intolerant and/or unresponsive patients, resistance development to long term CMV treatment, and improved survival rate increasing the population who remain at risk for CMV retinitis [2]. Moreover, there are several case reports of patients with elevated CD4+ T-cell counts who nevertheless experience a relapse of CMV retinitis [5–8]. Clearly, non-genetic factors such as poor general health, availability of sufficient health care and adherence to therapy are important factors in CMV retinitis development [9–11]. However, the effect of host genetics in CMV activation and progression to CMV retinitis has been largely unexplored.
The HCMV genome contains several genes that can evade the host immune system [1, 12]. One of these genes is a human interleukin-10 (IL-10) homolog called cmvIL-10 [13]. IL-10 is a pleiotropic cytokine that inhibits inflammatory and cell-mediated immune responses through suppression of production of proinflammatory cytokines and the expression of major histocompatibility complex class II and co-stimulatory molecules [14]. The receptor complex for IL-10 is composed of two subunits, IL-10R1 and IL-10R2. The binding of IL-10 to its receptor complex activates the Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT3/STAT1 signal transduction pathway. IL-10R1 (Jak1 associated), is the crucial ligand (IL-10) binding and signal transducing unit of the IL-10 receptor complex [15, 16]. The cmvIL-10 can bind to IL-10R1, initiate signaling through IL-10R complex, and exhibit nearly identical immunosuppressive properties similar to that of human IL-10 [17, 18]. Genetic polymorphisms of IL-10R1 have been shown to diminish the inhibitory effects of IL-10 on monocytes [19], and to reduce STAT3 and STAT1 activated signaling [20]. Moreover, IL-10R1 polymorphisms can decrease signaling activity of cmvIL-10 through the IL-10 signaling pathway [21]. Potential roles for IL-10 receptor polymorphisms in infectious disease outcomes have also been suggested. Specifically, effects of IL-10R1 variants in hepatitis C [22, 23] and progression to AIDS [24]. On the other hand, IL-10 variants that modulate IL-10 transcript production also regulate AIDS progression in HIV-1 infected individuals [24–27].
For this, study we took a candidate gene approach to investigate potential effects of host genetics on CMV retinitis development. We focused primarily on IL-10R1 polymorphisms, but also explored polymorphisms in IL-10. The study participants were HIV-infected European American and African American patients enrolled in the Longitudinal Study of the Ocular Complications of AIDS (LSOCA) cohort. As HCMV-related organ diseases are seen typically in the later years of HIV infection, correlate with AIDS progression (such as CD4+ T-cell counts), and HAART treatment, we also examined variants in genes [28, 29] that have been shown to influence HIV-1 infection, AIDS progression, therapy response, and antiviral drug metabolism to account for potential genetic confounding factors.
PATIENTS and METHODS
Study population and Clinical Assessment of CMV retinitis
Study patients included 750 European American and 534 African American individuals enrolled in the Longitudinal Studies of the Ocular Complications of AIDS (LSOCA) cohort. LSOCA is a prospective multicenter observational study of incident or prevalent cases diagnosed with AIDS according to the 1993 surveillance case definition of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Eligible patients included both incident and prevalent cases of CMV retinitis as well as those without CMV retinitis. The first patient was enrolled into the study in September 1998 and enrollment was still continuing through 30 Sep 2009. Each pateint provided a written consent for study participation. Further information on the study design and implementation and ophthalmologic examinations have been described in previous publications [4, 10, 11].
Genotyping and Haplotype construction
The IL-10R1 region was genotyped for high frequency (≥ 5%) functional and haplotype tagging variants (SNPs) of rs3135932 (Exon-4, replacement, also reported as SNP3 in the literature [19]), rs2228055 (Exon-5, replacement, also reported as SNP6 in the literature [19]), rs4252279, rs4252314, rs4252286 (Intron-6), rs2229113 (Exon-7, replacement, also reported as SNP4 in the literature [19]), and rs2229114 (Exon-7, replacement, also reported as SNP8 in the literature [19]). Additionally, 11 haplotype tagging SNPs (promoter region: rs17351243, rs4072227, rs6667202, rs1800890, rs1800896 and rs1800894; intronic: rs3021094, rs3024508; 3′ UTR: rs3024496, rs3024498 and rs3024500) covering the IL-10 region were selected. Supplemental figure 1 shows individually genotyped SNPs and inferred haplotypes for IL-10R1 in European and African Americans. Previously identified [28–31] functional polymorphisms for AIDS restriction and therapy response genes were genotyped for CCR5Δ32 (rs333), CCR2-64I (rs1799864), CCR5 P1 (rs1799988), SDF-3′A (rs1801157), RANTES -403A (rs2107538), RANTES -28G (rs2280788), RANTES-In1.1C (rs2280789), CX3CR1-V249I (rs3732379), CX3CR1-T280M (rs3732378), IFNG-179T (rs2069709), MDR1-C3435T (rs1045642), and MCP-1364G(rs2857657, intronic 767G, representative of haplotype 7). All SNPs were genotyped using the ABI-TaqMan method (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
All haplotypes were inferred by the expectation maximization algorithm with SAS Genetics (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and the HaploView software [32]. The presence of CCR5_59353C (rs1799988) in the absence of CCR2-64I and CCR5Δ32 defines the CCR5 P1 promoter haplotype +.P1.+. [31] The RANTES -403A, RANTES -28G, RANTES-In1.1C genotypes define the RANTES haplotypes. RANTES -H1=G-C-T, RANTES -H2=A-C-T and RANTES -H3=A-C-C (low producer haplotype) [30, 33].
Statistical Analyses
Each SNP and haplotype found at ≥ 1% frequency in the study population was evaluated as a risk factor for CMV retinitis by three different models of inheritance: allelic, dominant, and codominant (additive). Allelic analyses examined individual allele effects. Genotypes were coded as 0, 1 and 2 copies of the rare allele for the codominant (additive) model. Dominant model analyzed genotypes as absence or presence of the rare alleles. Odds Ratios (OR) for the codominant and dominant models were calculated by logistic regression. Nominal P values were reported. IL-10R1, and IL-10 haplotypes were further analyzed with a more powerful haplotype trend regression approach [34], where an estimated haplotype matrix of posterior probabilities for each individual was used in the regression models. The whole effect of haplotypes was assessed by the global tests followed by individual tests for each haplotype. Further, a stepwise regression approach was used to obtain the most parsimonious model. All regression models were adjusted for square root of nadir CD4+ T-cell count, log10HIV-1 load, age, gender and HAART. All analyses were performed with SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Throughout the manuscript cases represent study patients diagnosed with CMV retinitis and controls represent study patients who did not develop CMV retinitis.
Structural analysis of IL-10R1 amino acid changes was carried on the X-ray structure of human IL-10/IL-10R1 complex, pdb code 1Y6K [35].
RESULTS
Within European Americans (n = 750), patients with CMV retinitis were slightly younger (42.2 vs. 44.0, P = 0.01), had higher initial log10HIV viral load (5.21 vs. 5.03, P = 0.03), and lower CD4+ T-cell counts (32 vs. 79, P < 0.001) compared to patients without CMV retinitis (Table 1). Similar trends were observed for African American patients (n = 534), where patients with CMV retinitis were younger (39.0 vs. 42.1, P = 0.004), had higher log10HIV viral load (5.48 vs. 5.06, P < 0.001), and lower CD4+ T-cell counts (28 vs. 67, P < 0.001) compared to patients without CMV retinitis. Also, the fraction of African American patients on HAART was lower in the CMV cases (67% vs. 82%, P = 0.001) compared to the controls (Table 1). In addition, there were significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) in terms of male gender percentage (91% vs. 67%), age (43.5 vs 41.5), nadir CD4+ T-cell counts (67.6 vs. 55.1), and time since AIDS diagnosis before study enrollment (5.2 vs 4.0) between European American and African American study patients. Due to significant differences of these clinical covariates between and within groups, the dominant and codominant association models were adjusted for nadir CD4+ T-cell count, log10HIV viral load, age, gender and HAART.
TABLE 1.
Clinical aspects of European American and African American LSOCA patients used in this study
Variable | European Americans |
African Americans |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases (n=200) |
Controls (n=550) |
Cases (n=110) |
Controls (n=424) |
|||||
Mean±SD | Median (25th%, 75th%-tile) | Mean±SD | Median (25th%, 75th%-tile) | Mean±SD | Median (25th%, 75th%-tile) | Mean±SD | Median (25th%,75th%-tile) | |
Male gender (%) | 92 | 91 | 64 | 68 | ||||
Age at study entry (yrs)a | 42.2±7.2 | 41.0 (37, 47) | 44.0±8.6 | 43.0 (38, 49) | 39.0±8.2 | 38.0 (34,44) | 42.1±8.4 | 42.0 (37, 47) |
Nadir CD4+ T-cell count (cells/mL)a | 32.0±75.1 | 10.0 (5.25) | 79.3±92.5 | 50.0 (18, 120) | 28.4±66.9 | 9.0 (3, 22) | 61.6±70.2 | 32.0 (10, 95) |
Baseline HIV viral load (log10 copies/mL)a | 5.2±1.0 | 5.5 (4.9, 5.9) | 5.0±0.9 | 5.3 (4.6, 5.7) | 5.5±0.5 | 5.6 (5.2, 5.9) | 5.1±0.9 | 5.3 (4.7, 5.7) |
Time since AIDS diagnosis (yrs)b | 5.5±3.3 | 5.2 (3.3, 7.3) | 5.1±3.7 | 4.7 (2.1, 7.2) | 3.8±2.9 | 3.5 (1.5, 5.7) | 4.0±3.6 | 3.1 (1.0, 6.2) |
HAART use (%)c | 81 | 84 | 67 | 82 |
Significantly different between CMV retinitis cases and controls in European Americans and African Americans (see Results section for details)
Years before study entry
Significantly different between CMV retinitis cases and controls in African Americans (P = 0.001)
European American Analyses
In SNP-based analyses, the S (serine) to L (leucine) amino acid changing (replacement) mutation (S420L), rs2229114, that is present in the cytoplasmic domain of IL-10R1 was over-represented in patients without CMV retinitis in all three models of association tests (P = 0.03–0.04; Table 2). Moreover, none of the homozygote carriers of this mutation developed CMV retinitis. In contrast, another replacement (isoleucine to valine change) mutation, rs2228055, and an intronic variant, rs4252286, showed increased frequency in CMV cases, but the association tests were not significant (Table 2). Previously reported strong linkage disequilibrium between rs3135932 (SNP3) and rs2229113 (SNP4) also was observed in our data (D′ = 0.90, P = 10−55). However, rs2229114, rs2228055, and rs4252286 did not show significant linkage disequilibrium with each other or with any other SNP (Supplemental Figure 1).
Table 2.
Allelic distribution and association tests of IL-10R1 polymorphisms in CMV retinitis cases and controls
Gene | SNP | European Americans |
African Americans |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allele Frequency (%) |
Allelic |
Codominanta |
Dominanta |
Allele Frequency (%) |
Allelic |
Codominanta |
Dominanta |
||||||||||
Cases(n=200) | Controls (n=550) | OR | P | OR | P | OR | P | Cases(n=110) | Controls (n=424) | OR | P | OR | P | OR | P | ||
IL10-R1b | |||||||||||||||||
rs3135932 (A/G) | 17 | 14 | 1.21 | 0.23 | 1.27 | 0.18 | 1.39 | 0.11 | 2 | 3 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.54 | |
rs2228055 (A/G) | 7 | 5 | 1.49 | 0.11 | 1.55 | 0.14 | 1.55 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.20 | |
rs4252279 (C/T) | 9 | 11 | 0.81 | 0.31 | 0.79 | 0.26 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 11 | 11 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.94 | |
rs4252314 (A/G) | 3 | 4 | 0.68 | 0.26 | 0.66 | 0.27 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.61 | |
rs4252286 (G/A) | 4 | 2 | 1.61 | 0.15 | 1.95 | 0.08 | 1.95 | 0.08 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.50 | 0.28 | 1.22 | 0.84 | 1.22 | 0.84 | |
rs2229113 (G/A) | 30 | 29 | 1.03 | 0.81 | 1.08 | 0.61 | 1.19 | 0.35 | 19 | 20 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 1.02 | 0.92 | 1.07 | 0.75 | |
rs2229114 (C/T) | 2 | 5 | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 2 | 0.6 | 3.25 | 0.06 | 1.61 | 0.60 | 1.61 | 0.60 |
Logistic regression model results adjusted for square root of nadir CD4+ T-cell count, log10HIV-1 load, age, gender and HAART.
We were concerned that the rs2229114-T CMVR protective effect could also be associated with AIDS progression. So, we compared the allelic distribtuion of rs2229114-T in the patients with the highest and lowest 25% percentile CD4+ T-cell counts and HIV viral load among the CMV-negative patients. The rs2229114-T frequency was not significantly different (P = 0.44) between the highest and lowest 25% percentile CD4+ T-cell groups (5.4% vs. 4.3%), and was not significantly different (P = 0.78) between the highest and lowest 25% percentile HIV viral load groups (4.2% vs. 4.4%). Similar analyses with the low and high 50% percentiles also did not show significant rs2229114-T frequency distribution difference among these groups (CD4+ T-cell: 5.0% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.23; HIV viral load: 5.3% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.61).
None of the examined AIDS progression and therapy response related gene variants had signifiant association with CMV retinitis (Supplemental Table 1). Although an allelic association test indicated CMV retinitis susceptibility for the CCR5 promoter haplotype, +.P1.+, the effect was conflicting (codominant vs. dominant model) after correcting for the clinical covariates (Supplemental Table 1).
Analyses of haplotypes also indicated that certain IL-10R1 haplotypes were associated significantly with CMV retinitis development. In the haplotype trend regression analysis, eight parsimonious haplotypes were identified of which the AACAGGT was protective (OR = 0.14, P = 0.04) against, whereas the AGCAGGC was susceptible (OR = 6.21, P = 0.03) to CMV retinitis (Table 3). When compared against the most common and wild type haplotype AACAGGC, the protective effect of AACAGGT was still evident in a dominant (OR = 0.38, P = 0.03) and in an additive model (OR = 0.38, P = 0.03). Also, patients with the AGCAGGC haplotype had higher odds of CMV retinitis development compared to the patients with the wild type haplotype in a dominant (OR = 1.72, P = 0.05) and in an additive model (OR = 1.92, P = 0.05) analysis. All haplotype associations were significant irrespective of the clinical covariate corrections. Moreover, the haplotype analyses results agreed with the SNP-based analyses. The protective haplotype AACAGGT had only a single variant difference compared to the wild type haplotype AACAGGC, which was the protective SNP rs2229114. Similarly, the susceptible haplotype AGCAGGC had only one variant difference compared to the wild type haplotype, that is, the rs2228055 SNP that displayed a non-significant trend towards CMV retinitis susceptibility.
Table 3.
Haplotype Trend Regression Analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in IL-10R1.
Gene, haplotypes | European Americans |
African Americans |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haplotype Frequency (%) |
P |
OR (95% CI) | Haplotype Frequency (%) |
P |
OR(95% CI) | |||||
Cases (n=200) | Controls (n=550) | Global | Haplotype | Cases (n=110) | Controls (n=424) | Global | Haplotype | |||
IL-10R1 | 0.02 | 0.08 | ||||||||
AACAGGC | 49.3 | 51.2 | 0.94 | 0.98 (0.58–1.65) | 60.4 | 68.9 | 0.05 | 0.51 (0.25–1.00) | ||
AACAAGC | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.12 | 4.19 (0.69–25.49) | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.85 | 1.45 (0.03–63.85) | ||
AACAGAC | 13.3 | 13.9 | 0.87 | 1.07 (0.49–2.32) | 18.9 | 15.7 | 0.20 | 1.77 (0.74–4.25) | ||
AACAGGT | 1.7 | 4.1 | 0.04 | 0.14 (0.02–0.94) | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.25 | 7.82 (0.24–260) | ||
AATAGGC | 8.6 | 10.1 | 0.35 | 0.67 (0.28–1.56) | 12.1 | 10.2 | 0.55 | 1.35 (0.50–3.63) | ||
AGCAGGC | 5.7 | 3.5 | 0.03 | 6.21 (1.22–31.54) | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.36 | 0.22 (0.01–5.78) | ||
GACAGAC | 12.1 | 9.2 | 0.12 | 1.96 (0.84–4.56) | 2.2 | 2.0 | 0.70 | 1.65 (0.13–20.42) | ||
GACGGAC | 2.7 | 3.6 | 0.40 | 0.51 (0.11–2.45) | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.27 | 6.72 (0.23–193) |
Haplotypes were estimated using the ordered SNPs: rs3135932, rs2228055, rs4252279, rs4252314, rs4252286, rs2229113, rs2229114.
Regression models are adjusted for square root of nadir CD4+ T-cell count, log10HIV-1 load, age, gender and HAART.
We also evaluted potential structural implications that may be associated with the replacement (isoleucine (Ile) to valine (Val) change) SNP rs2228055. Ile224 is located in the proximity of the membrane and included in the large internal hydrophobic core in its bottom part formed by Leu132, Ile134, Ile139, Val203, Phe201 and Leu226. The replacement mutation Ile to Val (I224V, rs2228055) is a change of one hydrophobic to another hydrophobic residue. However, the volume of Val residue is much less than that of Ile (Supplemental Figure 2).
Omnibus CMV association analyses of IL-10 haplotypes were not significant (results not shown). Previously reported [26, 36] IL-10 proximal promoter haplotypes, formed by SNPs rs1800872, rs1800871 and rs1800896 (such as ATA, ACC and GCC) and associated with differential IL-10 production, were inferred with proxy SNPs rs1800872 and rs1800896 because of the high linkage disequilibrium between rs1800871 and rs1800872. Individual IL-10 haplotypes or grouping of these proximal promoter haplotypes did not have a significant effect on the development of CMV retinitis (results not shown).
African American Analyses
None of the examined IL-10R1 SNPs showed any statistically significant association with CMV retinitis (Table 2). Two IL-10 SNPs, rs3024500 and rs3024496, also showed a trend for increased susceptibility for CMV in models adjusted for the clinical covariates (P = 0.02–0.05; Supplemental Table 2). There was a strong linkage disequilibrium between these two SNPs (D′ = 0.9, P = 10−78), which implies that the susceptibility signal may be driven by just one of these SNPs or by an untyped SNP in this haplotype group. Moreover, the IL-10 rs4072227 variant showed a significant increase in CMV retinitis risk in an allelic model, but that effect was not as significant after correcting for clinical covariates (Supplemental Table 2). As CD4+ T-cell count, HIV viral load, and HAART have significant effects on CMV, we tested whether the aforementioned IL-10 SNPs had any effect on these clinical covariates but we did not observe any significant effects. Finally, SNP and haplotype analyses of the examined AIDS progression and therapy response related gene variants did not show any significant effect on CMV retinitis or on any clinical covariates tested (Supplemental Table 1).
Global CMV association tests for IL-10R1, and IL-10 haplotypes were not significant in African Americans (Table 3; results not shown). However, when haplotypes were examined individually, the IL-10R1 AACAGGC haplotype trended towards protection against CMV retinitis.
DISCUSSION
In this study we used a candidate gene approach to examine the potential effects of IL-10R1 mutations on CMV retinitis development. Upon observation of significant associations of the examined IL-10R1 variants with CMV outcome, we extended our analyses to IL-10 variants. Moreover, we examined variants in genes that have been shown to influence HIV-1 infection, AIDS progression, therapy response and antiviral drug metabolism to account for potential genetic confounding factors. Our results suggest that a haplotype carrying an amino acid changing variation in the cytoplasmic domain of IL-10R1 can be protective against, whereas another haplotype carrying an amino acid changing variation in the extracellular domain of IL-10R1 can be more susceptible to CMV retinitis. Overall, our results indicate that IL-10R1 amino acid changing mutations show a significant association with onset of CMV retinitis even after adjustment for the other genes and clinical covariates examined in European Americans. However, we note that none of our nominally significant P values will pass conservative Bonferroni multiple test correction.
The observed effects of IL-10R1 variants on development of CMV retinitis were specific to European Americans. In African American patients, similar effects of IL-10R1 variants were not observed, possibly because the derived allele and the associated haplotype frequencies were too low for any statistical power. A potential increased CMV retinitis susceptibility, specific to African Americans, was suggested by two IL-10 variants (that are in high linkage disequilibrium) after adjusting for the effects of AIDS related clinical covariates. The IL-10 rs3024500-C variant, over represented in African American patients with CMV retinitis, had previously been shown to increase the risk for severe complications of human ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a Gambian population [37]. Moreover, rs3024500-C allele was part of a higher IL-10 transcript producing haplotype that has been associated with susceptibility to sequelae of human ocular chlamydial infection [38]. Individual IL-10 polymorphism effects on the development of CMV retinitis in LSOCA African American patients may result from complex interactions between human IL-10 production, HIV infection progression, and HCMV activity. Statistically powerful modeling of potential effects of African American IL-10 variants (and their haplotypes) on the development of CMV retinitis requires more patients than were available for this study.
IL-10/IL-10R signaling path is a key pathway for viral persistence. Animal models lacking IL10 exhibit enhanced pathogen clearance [39–41] and blockage of IL-10/IL-10R signaling pathway leads to resolution of chronic viral infection [42, 43]. Thus, it is not surprising that human CMV uses its IL-10 homolog to bind to IL-10R1 [13] and to lead to immunosuppression [18]. The cmvIL-10 shows only 27% amino acid similarity to human IL-10, yet it has similar IL-10R1 affinity as does that of human IL-10. However, cmvIL-10 has a different interdomain angle compared to human IL-10 that changes the orientation of IL-10R1 in the putative cell surface complex [17]. Due to this structural difference, naturally occurring IL-10R1 amino acid polymorphisms may destabilize the cmvIL-10/IL-10R1 complex. Indeed, the common IL-10R1 variants rs3135932 (SNP3) and rs2229113 (SNP4) differentially reduce the signaling activity of cmvIL-10 [21]. In this study, we did not observe significant effects of these two SNPs on the development of CMV retinitis. Although rs3135932 and rs2229113 variants have been shown to reduce cmvIL-10 (and human IL-10) induced signaling activity, they do not totally diminish the signaling through the IL-10 receptor complex [20, 21]. These two SNPs may specifically affect the time to CMV-related disease. However, as our analyses concentrated on the end-point CMV retinitis, we might not have captured the potential effects of rs3135932 and rs2229113. The SNPs rs2229114 and rs2228055 and the associated haplotypes that showed an effect on the development of CMV retinitis in this study have not been investigated in any infectious disease outcome so far. Although the mutation Ile to Val (I224V, rs2228055) is a change of hydrophobic to another hydrophobic residue, the Ile is a much larger amino acid than the Val. For this reason the I224V change may affect the conformation of IL-10R1 structure in the proximity of the membrane, which in turn may affect the transduction of downstream signaling of the IL-10R complex. It is much harder to model the potential effects of the S420L (rs2229114) substitution, because this change involves a residue that is in the cytoplasmic domain of IL-10R1, for which no published crystal structure is available. However, 420S residue is a highly conserved residue in chimpanzee, mouse, rat, dog, and cow IL-10R1. Moreover, the cytoplasmic residues are thought to be involved in STAT3 binding and signal transduction. Therefore, S420L change may lead to a reduction in the IL-10 signaling pathway. Antibody blockade of the IL-10/IL-10R pathway in vitro has been shown to enhance CD4+ T-cell responses in samples from patients chronically infected with HIV [44]. Our findings suggest that a similar IL-10/IL-10R blockade may be useful in controlling chronic HCMV infections.
No world population, whether industrialized or not, is immune to HCMV infection. Recent surveys show that the prevalence of HCMV reaches up to 90–100% in some populations (i.e., Africa and southeast Asia) where incidence of HIV infections is also high [45]. Although usually associated with mild or no clinical symptoms, HCMV infections can lead to drastic end stage organ diseases which may be fatal when activated in immunocompromised patients. Our findings suggest that host genetics may play a crucial role in the development of one of these end stage organ diseases, CMV retinitis, in patients with AIDS. Previously, autopsy studies showed high incidence of other organ CMV infections in patients with CMV retinitis [46]. Indeed, 13% of the LSOCA patients who developed CMV retinitis in this study were also diagnosed with various CMV-related diseases including pneumonitis, pancreatitis, gastritis, and colitis, indicating the system wide disease of patients that have CMV activation. Moreover, patients co-infected with HIV and CMV progress more rapidly to AIDS and death than HIV infected patients who are not infected with CMV [11, 47–49]. Our results should stimulate further research, especially with longitudinal follow-up studies, to elucidate the role of IL-10 signalling and other host genetics in initiation and progression of CMV-related diseases.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and staff of all the participating clinical centers in this study. We are also grateful to Melanie Springer, Michael Malasky, Mary Thompson, Bailey Kessing, Christiana Martin, Nick Edler, Nicole Shifflett, Katy Limpert, Natalie Baggett, Kelly Subramanian, and Alyssa Drosdak for their assistance. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government. See supplemental Acknowledgements for LSOCA Clinical Centers Credit Roster.
Sources of support: This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E, and with cooperative agreements from the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, U10-EY-08052 to the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, U10-EY-08057 to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, and U10-EY-08067 to the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI.
Footnotes
This work has not been presented or published anywhere.
Conflict of interest:
Authors declare that they do not have an association that might pose a conflict of interest.
Authors also declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Gandhi MK, Khanna R. Human cytomegalovirus: clinical aspects, immune regulation, and emerging treatments. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:725–738. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01202-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jabs DA. AIDS and ophthalmology, 2008. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1143–1146. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.8.1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holbrook JT, Jabs DA, Weinberg DV, Lewis RA, Davis MD, Friedberg D. Visual loss in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome before widespread availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:99–107. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.1.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jabs DA. Ocular manifestations of HIV infection. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1995;93:623–683. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnson SC, Benson CA, Johnson DW, Weinberg A. Recurrences of cytomegalovirus retinitis in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient, despite potent antiretroviral therapy and apparent immune reconstitution. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:815–819. doi: 10.1086/319219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kirk O, Reiss P, Uberti-Foppa C, et al. Safe interruption of maintenance therapy against previous infection with four common HIV-associated opportunistic pathogens during potent antiretroviral therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:239–250. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-4-200208200-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Komanduri KV, Feinberg J, Hutchins RK, et al. Loss of cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ T cell responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients with high CD4+ T cell counts and recurrent retinitis. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:1285–1289. doi: 10.1086/319683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Torriani FJ, Freeman WR, Macdonald JC, et al. CMV retinitis recurs after stopping treatment in virological and immunological failures of potent antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2000;14:173–180. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200001280-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jabs DA, Van Natta ML, Kempen JH, et al. Characteristics of patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:48–61. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01322-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jabs DA, Van Natta ML, Thorne JE, et al. Course of cytomegalovirus retinitis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: 1. Retinitis progression Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2224–2231. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jabs DA, Holbrook JT, Van Natta ML, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with AIDS in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:771–779. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reddehase MJ. Antigens and immunoevasins: opponents in cytomegalovirus immune surveillance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:831–844. doi: 10.1038/nri932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kotenko SV, Saccani S, Izotova LS, Mirochnitchenko OV, Pestka S. Human cytomegalovirus harbors its own unique IL-10 homolog (cmvIL-10) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:1695–1700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, O’Garra A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:683–765. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kotenko SV, Krause CD, Izotova LS, Pollack BP, Wu W, Pestka S. Identification and functional characterization of a second chain of the interleukin-10 receptor complex. EMBO J. 1997;16:5894–5903. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.19.5894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Spencer SD, Di Marco F, Hooley J, et al. The orphan receptor CRF2-4 is an essential subunit of the interleukin 10 receptor. J Exp Med. 1998;187:571–578. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.4.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jones BC, Logsdon NJ, Josephson K, Cook J, Barry PA, Walter MR. Crystal structure of human cytomegalovirus IL-10 bound to soluble human IL-10R1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:9404–9409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152147499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Spencer JV, Lockridge KM, Barry PA, et al. Potent immunosuppressive activities of cytomegalovirus-encoded interleukin-10. J Virol. 2002;76:1285–1292. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.3.1285-1292.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gasche C, Grundtner P, Zwirn P, et al. Novel variants of the IL-10 receptor 1 affect inhibition of monocyte TNF-alpha production. J Immunol. 2003;170:5578–5582. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.11.5578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grundtner P, Gruber S, Murray SS, et al. The IL-10R1 S138G loss-of-function allele and ulcerative colitis. Genes Immun. 2009;10:84–92. doi: 10.1038/gene.2008.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gruber SG, Gloria Luciani M, Grundtner P, Zdanov A, Gasche C. Differential signaling of cmvIL-10 through common variants of the IL-10 receptor 1. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:3365–3375. doi: 10.1002/eji.200837718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hennig BJ, Frodsham AJ, Hellier S, et al. Influence of IL-10RA and IL-22 polymorphisms on outcome of hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int. 2007;27:1134–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01518.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hofer H, Neufeld JB, Oesterreicher C, et al. Bi-allelic presence of the interleukin-10 receptor 1 G330R allele is associated with cirrhosis in chronic HCV-1 infection. Genes Immun. 2005;6:242–247. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Do H, Vasilescu A, Diop G, et al. Associations of the IL2Ralpha, IL4Ralpha, IL10Ralpha, and IFN (gamma) R1 cytokine receptor genes with AIDS progression in a French AIDS cohort. Immunogenetics. 2006;58:89–98. doi: 10.1007/s00251-005-0072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oleksyk TK, Shrestha S, Truelove AL, et al. Extended IL10 haplotypes and their association with HIV progression to AIDS. Genes Immun. 2009;10:309–322. doi: 10.1038/gene.2009.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shin HD, Winkler C, Stephens JC, et al. Genetic restriction of HIV-1 pathogenesis to AIDS by promoter alleles of IL10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:14467–14472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vasilescu A, Heath SC, Ivanova R, et al. Genomic analysis of Th1-Th2 cytokine genes in an AIDS cohort: identification of IL4 and IL10 haplotypes associated with the disease progression. Genes Immun. 2003;4:441–449. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hendrickson SL, Jacobson LP, Nelson GW, et al. Host genetic influences on highly active antiretroviral therapy efficacy and AIDS-free survival. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;48:263–271. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31816fdc5f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O’Brien SJ, Nelson GW. Human genes that limit AIDS. Nat Genet. 2004;36:565–574. doi: 10.1038/ng1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.An P, Nelson GW, Wang L, et al. Modulating influence on HIV/AIDS by interacting RANTES gene variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10002–10007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142313799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Martin MP, Dean M, Smith MW, et al. Genetic acceleration of AIDS progression by a promoter variant of CCR5. Science. 1998;282:1907–1911. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu H, Chao D, Nakayama EE, et al. Polymorphism in RANTES chemokine promoter affects HIV-1 disease progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:4581–4585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zaykin DV, Westfall PH, Young SS, Karnoub MA, Wagner MJ, Ehm MG. Testing association of statistically inferred haplotypes with discrete and continuous traits in samples of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered. 2002;53:79–91. doi: 10.1159/000057986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yoon SI, Jones BC, Logsdon NJ, Walter MR. Same structure, different function crystal structure of the Epstein-Barr virus IL-10 bound to the soluble IL-10R1 chain. Structure. 2005;13:551–564. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Crawley E, Kay R, Sillibourne J, Patel P, Hutchinson I, Woo P. Polymorphic haplotypes of the interleukin-10 5′ flanking region determine variable interleukin-10 transcription and are associated with particular phenotypes of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1101–1108. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1101::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Natividad A, Wilson J, Koch O, et al. Risk of trachomatous scarring and trichiasis in Gambians varies with SNP haplotypes at the interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 loci. Genes Immun. 2005;6:332–340. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Natividad A, Holland MJ, Rockett KA, et al. Susceptibility to sequelae of human ocular chlamydial infection associated with allelic variation in IL10 cis-regulation. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:323–329. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Belkaid Y, Piccirillo CA, Mendez S, Shevach EM, Sacks DL. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells control Leishmania major persistence and immunity. Nature. 2002;420:502–507. doi: 10.1038/nature01152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dittmer U, Race B, Peterson KE, Stromnes IM, Messer RJ, Hasenkrug KJ. Essential roles for CD8+ T cells and gamma interferon in protection of mice against retrovirus-induced immunosuppression. J Virol. 2002;76:450–454. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.1.450-454.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.van Den Broek M, Bachmann MF, Kohler G, et al. IL-4 and IL-10 antagonize IL-12-mediated protection against acute vaccinia virus infection with a limited role of IFN-gamma and nitric oxide synthetase 2. J Immunol. 2000;164:371–378. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.1.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brooks DG, Trifilo MJ, Edelmann KH, Teyton L, McGavern DB, Oldstone MB. Interleukin-10 determines viral clearance or persistence in vivo. Nat Med. 2006;12:1301–1309. doi: 10.1038/nm1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ejrnaes M, Filippi CM, Martinic MM, et al. Resolution of a chronic viral infection after interleukin-10 receptor blockade. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2461–2472. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Clerici M, Wynn TA, Berzofsky JA, et al. Role of interleukin-10 in T helper cell dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:768–775. doi: 10.1172/JCI117031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mocarski ES, Shenk T, Pass RF. Cytomegaloviruses. Fields Virology. 2007:2701–2772. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pepose JS, Holland GN, Nestor MS, Cochran AJ, Foos RY. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Pathogenic mechanisms of ocular disease. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:472–484. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kovacs A, Schluchter M, Easley K, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection and HIV-1 disease progression in infants born to HIV-1-infected women. Pediatric Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Complications of Vertically Transmitted HIV Infection Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:77–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907083410203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sabin CA, Phillips AN, Lee CA, Janossy G, Emery V, Griffiths PD. The effect of CMV infection on progression of human immunodeficiency virus disease is a cohort of haemophilic men followed for up to 13 years from seroconversion. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;114:361–372. doi: 10.1017/s095026880005799x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Webster A, Lee CA, Cook DG, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection and progression towards AIDS in haemophiliacs with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Lancet. 1989;2:63–66. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90312-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.