Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2010 Jun 14;54(9):4041–4043. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00330-10

Fixed-Ratio Combination Testing of an Echinocandin, Anidulafungin, and an Azole, Voriconazole, against 1,467 Candida Species Isolates

Ronald N Jones 1, Mariana Castanheira 1,*, Michael A Pfaller 1
PMCID: PMC2935005  PMID: 20547802

Anidulafungin is a newer echinocandin antifungal agent, approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) in 2006 (18), with well-documented potency against Candida spp. and a MIC90 value of 0.06 μg/ml reported for a sample of 2,869 Candida albicans isolates across a 6-year collection (16). In common with other echinocandins, anidulafungin MIC90 values for C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii can be elevated (1 to 4 μg/ml) (8, 10, 16, 17).

Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal that is structurally related to fluconazole (1). Voriconazole has broad-spectrum activity against Candida spp. and has been approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis and invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic patients (11, 19). Compared to fluconazole, voriconazole demonstrates enhanced activity against Candida spp. (5, 15). Voriconazole is active against the commonly isolated species of Candida, including C. albicans (MIC90, 0.015 to 0.06 μg/ml), C. tropicalis (MIC90, 0.12 to 0.25 μg/ml), and C. parapsilosis (MIC90, 0.06 to 0.12 μg/ml) (14, 15). Notably, voriconazole is also active against C. krusei (MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml), a species considered to be intrinsically resistant to fluconazole (MIC90, 64 μg/ml) (14, 15). Although activity has also been demonstrated against C. glabrata, MICs are higher (MIC90, 1 to 2 μg/ml) and resistance is more common than with other species (4, 14, 15).

This protocol was designed to (i) quantify the potency and spectrum of anidulafungin and voriconazole using CLSI reference methods (2, 3) and (ii) assess the activity of anidulafungin combined with voriconazole (2:1 ratio) against a large collection of Candida spp. (8). The results were analyzed by directly comparing the MIC values of each agent tested alone or as a component of the 2:1 ratio test. The ratio was selected to mimic the concurrent exposures (area under the curve [AUC] and maximum drug concentration in serum [Cmax]) to each antifungal agent as listed in the U.S. FDA product package inserts (18-20).

A total of 1,467 Candida sp. fungemia isolates were submitted by participating medical centers in North America, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region to the central monitoring laboratory (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA) for testing (8). All strains were tested by the reference broth microdilution methods for yeasts as recommended by the CLSI M27-A3 approved standard (2, 3). Interpretive criteria used for yeasts when testing voriconazole and anidulafungin were those of the CLSI (M27-S3, 2008) (2, 3, 17). The quality control (QC) strains utilized included C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 (2, 3, 7); all QC results were within published MIC limits (3, 7).

The activities of the two agents tested against the over 1,400 Candida spp. (MIC50/90 and percent susceptible) were as follows: anidulafungin, 0.03/1 μg/ml and 99.0%; voriconazole, ≤0.06/0.25 μg/ml and 98.3%. The combination of anidulafungin and voriconazole demonstrated enhanced activity when tested at a 2:1 ratio against these Candida spp. (Table 1). Anidulafungin tested alone had a MIC90 of 1 μg/ml, whereas that value was reduced to 0.06 μg/ml when it was combined with voriconazole. Similarly, the voriconazole MIC90 of 0.25 μg/ml was decreased to ≤0.03 μg/ml when it was tested with anidulafungin. The combination was 8- to 16-fold more potent than each agent was alone (MIC90 comparison), and all anidulafungin/voriconazole (2:1 ratio) MIC test values were ≤1/0.5 μg/ml, i.e., below the suggested susceptibility breakpoint for one or both agents (3, 17).

TABLE 1.

Comparisons of anidulafungin and voriconazole tested alone or in a 2:1 ratio combination against 1,467 Candida spp. clinical isolatesd

Species (no. of isolates tested), antifungal agent,c and test Cumulative % inhibited at MIC (μg/ml)a of:
≤0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8
C. albicans (768)
    ANF
        Alone 88.9 99.6 100.0
        Combination 81.1 99.9 100.0
    VRC
        Alone b 98.9 100.0
        Combination 99.9 100.0
C. glabrata (204)
    ANF
        Alone 9.3 72.1 96.6 98.0 98.0 100.0
        Combination 32.5 88.7 97.0 99.0 99.5 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 14.8 48.3 66.5 83.3 90.2 93.6 98.0 100.0
        Combination 88.7 97.0 99.0 99.5 100.0
C. tropicalis (156)
    ANF
        Alone 73.3 92.4 98.7 98.7 100.0
        Combination 24.4 81.4 98.7 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 95.5 97.4 97.4 100.0
        Combination 81.4 98.7 100.0
C. krusei (30)
    ANF
        Alone 13.3 70.0 90.0 90.0 93.3 96.7 100.0
        Combination 3.3 63.3 90.0 90.0 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 0.0 16.7 73.3 83.3 90.0 100.0
        Combination 63.3 90.0 90.0 100.0
C. lusitaniae
    ANF
        Alone 0.0 0.0 14.3 78.6 100.0
        Combination 92.9 92.9 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 92.9 92.9 100.0
        Combination 92.9 100.0
C. parapsilosis (247)
    ANF
        Alone 0.4 1.6 1.6 2.0 12.2 47.4 93.9 100.0
        Combination 55.4 82.9 90.0 95.8 99.2 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 88.3 94.6 98.3 99.6 99.6 100.0
        Combination 82.9 90.0 95.8 99.2 100.0
Other Candida spp. (48)
    ANF
        Alone 18.8 39.6 50.0 52.1 54.2 64.6 83.3 100.0
        Combination 56.8 67.6 86.5 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 62.2 83.8 89.2 94.6 97.3 100.0
        Combination 67.6 86.5 100.0
Total (1,467)
    ANF
        Alone 57.4 76.1 81.3 82.3 84.5 90.9 99.0 100.0
        Combination 61.7 91.9 97.2 99.0 99.8 100.0
    VRC
        Alone 82.0 89.4 94.0 97.1 98.3 99.1 99.7 100.0
        Combination 91.9 97.2 99.0 99.8 100.0
a

MIC read at 24 h and 50% decrease in growth in accordance with CLSI criteria (2, 3). Anidulafungin/voriconazole (2:1 ratio) test consistent with in vivo ratios of Cmaxand AUC.

b

—, untested concentration.

c

ANF, anidulafungin; VRC, voriconazole.

d

SENTRY Program, 2006 and 2007.

The combination of anidulafungin and voriconazole resulted in improved activity against the putatively resistant species C. glabrata (voriconazole) and C. parapsilosis (anidulafungin) (Table 1). The MIC90 for C. glabrata decreased from 1 μg/ml (90.2%) for voriconazole alone to 0.06 μg/ml (97.0%) when it was combined with anidulafungin. Likewise, the MIC90 for C. parapsilosis decreased from 2 μg/ml (93.9%) for anidulafungin alone to 0.12 μg/ml (90.0%) when it was combined with voriconazole. Recently, Garcia-Effron et al. (6) suggested that the susceptibility breakpoint for the echinocandins be lowered from ≤2 μg/ml to ≤0.25 μg/ml to improve the detection of fks mutant strains of Candida. As shown in Table 1, the combination of anidulafungin and voriconazole would capture 99.0% of the isolates tested at an MIC of ≤0.25 μg/ml versus only 82.3% when anidulafungin was tested alone.

These in vitro results markedly expand upon what has been reported elsewhere (12) concerning the activity of anidulafungin and voriconazole in combination versus Candida and suggest a favorable interaction of these agents when they are used together against Candida spp. As resistances emerge among these fungal pathogens (6, 9, 13), combination treatments could assume a valuable therapeutic role (11).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 14 June 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chandrasekar, P. H., and E. Manavathu. 2001. Voriconazole, a second generation triazole. Drugs Today 37:135-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. M27-A3. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: third edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 3.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. M27-S3. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: 3rd informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 4.Diekema, D. J., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, L. Boyken, S. Tendolkar, J. Kroeger, R. N. Jones, and M. A. Pfaller. 2009. A global evaluation of voriconazole activity tested against recent clinical isolates of Candida spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 63:233-236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Diekema, D. J., S. A. Messer, L. B. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, J. Kroeger, S. Tendolkar, and M. A. Pfaller. 2009. Antifungal activity against a large global collection of rare Candida species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:3170-3177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garcia-Effron, G., S. Park, and D. S. Perlin. 2009. Correlating echinocandin MIC and kinetic inhibition of fks1 mutant glucan synthases for Candida albicans: implications for interpretive breakpoints. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:112-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krisher, K., S. D. Brown, and M. M. Traczewski. 2004. Quality control parameters for broth microdilution tests of anidulafungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Messer, S. A., G. J. Moet, J. T. Kirby, and R. N. Jones. 2009. Activity of contemporary antifungal agents, including the novel echinocandin anidulafungin, tested against Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and Aspergillus spp.: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006 to 2007). J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1942-1946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moudgal, V., T. Little, D. Boikov, and J. A. Vazquez. 2005. Multiechinocandin- and multiazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis isolates serially obtained during therapy for prosthetic valve endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:767-769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., J. H. Rex, P. G. Pappas, R. J. Hamill, R. A. Larsen, H. W. Horowitz, W. G. Powderly, N. Hyslop, C. A. Kauffman, J. Cleary, J. E. Mangino, and J. Lee. 2003. Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3149-3154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pappas, P. G., C. A. Kauffman, D. Andes, D. K. Benjamin, Jr., T. F. Calandra, J. E. Edwards, Jr., S. G. Filler, J. F. Fisher, B. J. Kullberg, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, A. C. Reboli, J. H. Rex, T. J. Walsh, and J. D. Sobel. 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:503-535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perkhofer, S., and C. Lass-Florl. 2009. Anidulafungin and voriconazole in invasive fungal disease: pharmacological data and their use in combination. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 18:1393-1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Perlin, D. S. 2007. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resist. Updat. 10:121-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, J. H. Rex, A. Espinel-Ingroff, E. M. Johnson, D. Andes, V. Chaturvedi, M. A. Ghannoum, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, D. J. Sheehan, P. Troke, T. J. Walsh, and D. W. Warnock. 2006. Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against voriconazole: analysis and proposal for interpretive breakpoints. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:819-826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2007. Use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to voriconazole among 13,338 clinical isolates of Candida spp. tested by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-recommended broth microdilution methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:70-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pfaller, M. A., L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, J. Kroeger, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2008. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:150-156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. H. Rex, B. D. Alexander, D. Andes, S. D. Brown, V. Chaturvedi, M. A. Ghannoum, C. C. Knapp, D. J. Sheehan, and T. J. Walsh. 2008. Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin: analysis and proposal for interpretive MIC breakpoints. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2620-2629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pfizer. 2010. Anidulafungin package insert. http://media.pfizer.com/files/products/uspi_eraxis.pdf.
  • 19.Pfizer. 2010. Voriconazole package insert. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2006/021266s18,021267s19,021630s10lbl.pdf.
  • 20.Wagner, C., W. Graninger, E. Presterl, and C. Joukhadar. 2006. The echinocandins: comparison of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical applications. Pharmacology 78:161-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES