Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2010 Jun 14;54(9):3980–3984. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00046-10

Experimental Murine Scedosporiosis: Histopathology and Azole Treatment

M Mar Rodríguez 1, F Javier Pastor 1, Valentina Salas 1, Enrique Calvo 1, Emilio Mayayo 2, Josep Guarro 1,*
PMCID: PMC2935030  PMID: 20547805

Abstract

The histopathology of clinical isolates of Scedosporium apiospermum, Scedosporium boydii, and Scedosporium aurantiacum in immunosuppressed mice was evaluated. The organs most affected were the brain, kidneys, and spleen. S. aurantiacum produced more tissue damage than the other two species. Amphotericin B (AMB) was ineffective in the treatment of murine infections caused by such isolates, and posaconazole and voriconazole showed efficacy that correlated with the in vitro susceptibility data.


Pseudallescheria boydii sensu lato is a complex of species, some of which are involved in severe infections (6, 14). The most clinically relevant species of the complex are Scedosporium boydii (anamorph of Pseudallescheria boydii), Scedosporium apiospermum (anamorph of Pseudallescheria apiosperma), and Scedosporium aurantiacum (1, 10, 11, 15). Despite aggressive therapy, invasive scedosporiosis causes a high mortality rate (6, 14). Few data exist on the antifungal response of the current species of the complex (12). Amphotericin B (AMB) has generally demonstrated poor in vitro and in vivo activity (4, 5, 7, 8, 14, 17). Voriconazole (VRC) and posaconazole (PSC) are active in vitro (7, 8, 14) and have shown efficacy in animal models (3, 5, 13) and in clinical trials and case reports (2, 16, 18, 20, 22). We have compared the virulence of S. apiospermum, S. boydii, and S. aurantiacum, and their responses to PSC and VRC, in disseminated murine infection.

We tested six strains, two representing each of the species mentioned above (Table 1). Their in vitro susceptibilities to the antifungals AMB, VRC, and PSC were determined by a reference method (19). AMB was not active against any of the isolates tested. VRC and PSC were active in vitro against most of the strains tested, except for one strain of S. aurantiacum against which these drugs were inactive (Table 2). Male OF1 mice were used. All animal care procedures were supervised and approved by the Universitat Rovira i Virgili Animal Welfare Committee. Mice were immunosuppressed by a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 200 mg of cyclophosphamide/kg of body weight plus intravenous administration of 5-fluorouracil at 150 mg/kg of body weight 1 day prior to the infection. The isolates were subcultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) prior to testing. The inoculum size was determined from hemacytometer counts and conidial viability. Animals were infected with 1 × 104 CFU/mouse in 0.2 ml of sterile normal saline injected via a lateral tail vein. For all the strains tested, this inoculum was able to produce an acute infection, with 100% of the animals dying within 6 to 10 days. For histopathological studies, groups of 10 animals were randomly established for each strain and were sacrificed on day 4 postinfection. The lungs, brain, spleen, liver, and kidneys were aseptically removed. Cultures of the homogenates of half of each organ were performed on PDA incubated at 30°C. The numbers of CFU per gram of tissue were calculated. For the histological study, half of each organ was fixed with 10% buffered formalin.

TABLE 1.

Strains of the P. boydii complex included in this study

Strain Species Origin
FMR 6694 S. boydii Cerebral abscess, Barcelona, Spain
FMR 8627 S. boydii Clinical, Madrid, Spain
CBS 117407 S. apiospermum Keratitis, São Paulo, Brazil
IHEM 14464 S. apiospermum Cystic fibrosis, Tours, France
CBS 116910 S. aurantiacum Ankle ulcer, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
IHEM 15458 S. aurantiacum Cystic fibrosis, Giens, France

TABLE 2.

In vitro antifungal activities of AMB, VRC, and PSC against two strains each of S. boydii, S. apiospermum, and S. aurantiacum

Species and strain MIC (μg/ml)
AMB VRC PSC
S. boydii
    FMR 6694 32 1 1
    FMR 8627 8 0.5 1
S. apiospermum
    CBS 117407 8 0.5 1
    IHEM 14464 32 0.25 0.5
S. aurantiacum
    CBS 116910 32 32 32
    IHEM 15458 32 1 2

In the treatment studies, the drugs tested were AMB, given at 1.5 mg/kg/day i.p.; PSC, at 10 or 20 mg/kg twice a day orally (p.o.); and VRC, at 20 or 40 mg/kg/day orally. From 3 days prior to infection, the mice that received VRC and the control group were given grapefruit juice instead of water in order to block VRC metabolism (9, 21). Groups of 10 mice were randomly established for each strain and each treatment. Treatments began 24 h after challenge and lasted for 10 days in survival studies; animals were checked daily for 20 days after challenge. For tissue burden studies, groups of 10 mice were also established, and the animals were sacrificed on day 4 after infection. The kidneys and brain were removed aseptically and were gently homogenized in 2 ml sterile saline. Dilutions of the homogenates were plated on PDA.

Mean survival time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared among groups by using the log rank test. Colony counts in tissue burden studies were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, and the Bonferroni correction was used when required.

Fungi were present in all organs tested. The three species tested showed marked brain tropism. The brain was most affected, followed by the kidney, spleen, liver, and lung (Fig. 1). Histological studies revealed focal infiltration by hyphae in blood vessels and in parenchyma, though only in the brains and kidneys of mice infected with S. boydii or, especially, with S. aurantiacum, which in addition produced edema and tubular necrosis in kidneys. In mice infected with S. apiospermum, abscesses were observed in the brain parenchyma and in the kidney, with abundant inflammatory cells but without the presence of hyphae (Fig. 2).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Quantitative fungal recovery from different organs of immunosuppressed mice infected with S. boydii FMR 6694 (A) or FMR 8627 (B), S. apiospermum IHEM 14464 (C) or CBS 117407 (D), or S. aurantiacum CBS 116910 (E) or IHEM 15458 (F). Superscript letters indicate significant differences from values for the lung (P < 0.005) (a), liver (P < 0.005) (b), kidney (P < 0.05) (c), or spleen (P < 0.05) (d). Horizontal lines indicate means.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Histological findings for S. boydii (A and B), S. apiospermum (C and D), and S. aurantiacum (E and F) in mice. (A) Fungal infiltration with abundant presence of hyphae in the kidney. (B) Brain section with invasion by hyphae but with no necrosis or inflammatory response. (C) Kidney showing an abscess with abundant inflammatory cells. (D) Microabscess in the brain parenchyma. (E) Kidney section showing hyphae invading the parenchyma, edema, and tubular necrosis. (F) Brain section showing hyphae invading a blood vessel lumen. The stains used are PAS (A, B, and E), hematoxylin and eosin (C and D), and Grocott strain (F).

AMB was not able to improve the survival of mice. All the doses of PSC and VRC tested prolonged survival in all cases (Fig. 3). The highest doses of the two azoles (40 mg/kg) showed similarly high efficacies. VRC showed a dose-response efficacy. S. aurantiacum strain CBS 116910 responded least to the highest doses of VRC and PSC. For this strain, PSC and VRC showed the highest MICs (32 μg/ml).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Cumulative mortality of mice infected with S. boydii FMR 6694 or FMR 8627, S. apiospermum IHEM 14464 or CBS 117407, or S. aurantiacum CBS 116910 or IHEM 15458. Mice were treated with AMB, PSC, or VRC. AMB 1.5, amphotericin B administered at 1.5 mg/kg/day i.p.; PSC 20, posaconazole administered at 10 mg/kg p.o. twice a day; PSC 40, posaconazole administered at 20 mg/kg p.o. twice a day; VRC 20, voriconazole administered at 20 mg/kg/day p.o.; VRC 40, voriconazole administered at 40 mg/kg/day p.o. Superscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) from values for the control (a), AMB 1.5 (b), PSC 20 (c), or VRC 20 (d).

In all cases, AMB was also ineffective at reducing the fungal load (Fig. 4). The highest doses (40 mg/kg) of VRC and PSC reduced tissue burdens in all cases except for S. aurantiacum strain CBS 116910. Lower doses of both drugs were less effective at reducing the fungal load.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Effects of the antifungal treatment on colony counts of S. boydii FMR 6694 and FMR 8627, S. apiospermum IHEM 14464 and CBS 117407, and S. aurantiacum CBS 116910 and IHEM 15458 in the brains and kidneys of mice. AMB 1.5, amphotericin B administered at 1.5 mg/kg/day i.p.; PSC 20, posaconazole administered at 10 mg/kg p.o. twice a day; PSC 40, posaconazole administered at 20 mg/kg p.o. twice a day; VRC 20, voriconazole administered at 20 mg/kg/day p.o.; VRC 40, voriconazole administered at 40 mg/kg/day p.o. Horizontal lines indicate means. Superscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) from values for the control (a), AMB (b), PSC 20 (c), and VRC 20 (d).

This study confirms the higher virulence of S. aurantiacum, which was already observed in a previous study, although that study tested only the survival rate of mice (10). In general, in vivo results correlated with in vitro data, since VRC and PSC displayed good in vitro activity, showed efficacy in prolonging survival, and reduced S. apiospermum and S. boydii burdens in tissues. In the case of S. aurantiacum, VRC and PSC at high doses were more effective at prolonging survival and reducing fungal loads in the brains and kidneys of mice challenged with the strain that showed lower MICs than in those infected with the strain that had higher MICs.

The different pathological behaviors of the species of the complex, together with their different responses to antifungals, seem to suggest that infections caused by S. aurantiacum could be more severe and more difficult to treat than those caused by other species. VRC and PSC may have a clinical role in the treatment of disseminated scedosporiosis caused by S. boydii, by S. apiospermum, and by strains of S. aurantiacum with low VRC and PSC MICs.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 14 June 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Monzón, and J. L. Rodríguez-Tudela. 2007. Prevalence and susceptibility testing of new species of Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium in a collection of clinical mold isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:748-751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Apostolova, L. G., E. K. Johnson, and H. P. Adams, Jr. 2005. Disseminated Pseudallescheria boydii infection successfully treated with voriconazole. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76:1741-1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Capilla, J., and J. Guarro. 2004. Correlation between in vitro susceptibility of Scedosporium apiospermum to voriconazole and in vivo outcome of scedosporiosis in guinea pigs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4009-4011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Capilla, J., E. Mayayo, C. Serena, F. J. Pastor, and J. Guarro. 2004. A novel murine model of cerebral scedosporiosis: lack of efficacy of amphotericin B. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:1092-1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Capilla, J., C. Serena, F. J. Pastor, M. Ortoneda, and J. Guarro. 2003. Efficacy of voriconazole in treatment of systemic scedosporiosis in neutropenic mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3976-3978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cortez, K. J., E. Roilides, F. Queiroz-Telles, J. Meletiadis, C. Antachopoulos, T. Knudsen, W. Buchanan, J. Milanovich, D. A. Sutton, A. Fothergill, M. G. Rinaldi, Y. R. Shea, T. Zaoutis, S. Kottilil, and T. J. Walsh. 2008. Infections caused by Scedosporium spp. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21:157-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cuenca-Estrella, M., A. Alastruey-Izquierdo, L. Alcazar-Fuoli, L. Bernal-Martinez, A. Gomez-Lopez, M. J. Buitrago, E. Mellado, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2008. In vitro activities of 35 double combinations of antifungal agents against Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1136-1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Espinel-Ingroff, A., E. Johnson, H. Hockey, and P. Troke. 2008. Activities of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 590 moulds from 323 patients in the voriconazole Phase III clinical studies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:616-620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Graybill, J. R., L. K. Najvar, G. M. Gonzalez, S. Hernandez, and R. Bocanegra. 2003. Improving the mouse model for studying the efficacy of voriconazole. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1373-1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gilgado, F., J. Cano, J. Gené, C. Serena, and J. Guarro. 2009. Different virulence of the species of the Pseudallescheria boydii complex. Med. Mycol. 47:371-374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilgado, F., J. Cano, J. Gené, D. A. Sutton, and J. Guarro. 2008. Molecular and phenotypic data supporting distinct species statuses for Scedosporium apiospermum and Pseudallescheria boydii and the proposed new species Scedosporium dehogii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:766-771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gilgado, F., C. Serena, J. Cano, J. Gené, and J. Guarro. 2006. Antifungal susceptibilities of the species of Pseudallescheria boydii complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:4211-4213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gonzalez, G. M., R. Tijerina, L. K. Najvar, R. Bocanegra, M. G. Rinaldi, D. Loebenberg, and J. R. Graybill. 2003. Activity of posaconazole against Pseudallescheria boydii: in vitro and in vivo assays. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1436-1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guarro, J., A. S. Kantarcioglu, R. Horré, J. L. Rodríguez-Tudela, M. Cuenca-Estrella, J. Berenguer, and G. S. de Hoog. 2006. Scedosporium apiospermum: changing clinical spectrum of a therapy-refractory opportunist. Med. Mycol. 44:295-327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harun, A., H. Perdomo, F. Gilgado, S. C. Chen, J. Cano, J. Guarro, and W. Meyer. 2009. Genotyping of Scedosporium species: a review of molecular approaches. Med. Mycol. 47:406-414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Husain, S., P. Muñoz, G. Forrest, B. D. Alexander, J. Somani, K. Brennan, M. M. Wagener, and N. Singh. 2005. Infections due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in transplant recipients: clinical characteristics and impact of antifungal agent therapy on outcome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:89-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kowacs, P. A., C. E. Soares-Silvado, S. Monteiro, M. Ramos, K. Abrao, L. E. Madaloso, R. L. Pinheiro, and L. C. Werneck. 2004. Infection of the CNS by Scedosporium apiospermum after near drowning. Report of a fatal case and analysis of its confounding factors. J. Clin. Pathol. 57:205-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mellinghoff, I. K., D. J. Winston, G. Mukwaya, and G. J. Schiller. 2002. Treatment of Scedosporium apiospermum brain abscesses with posaconazole. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:1648-1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.NCCLS/CLSI. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi: approved standard, 2nd ed. Document M38-A2. NCCLS/CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  • 20.Porte, L., S. Khatibi, L. El Hajj, S. Cassaing, A. Berry, P. Massip, M. D. Linas, J. F. Magnaval, N. Sans, and B. Marchou. 2006. Scedosporium apiospermum mycetoma with bone involvement successfully treated with voriconazole. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 100:891-894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sugar, A. M., and X. Liu. 2001. Efficacy of voriconazole in treatment of murine pulmonary blastomycosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:601-604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Troke, P., K. Aguirrebengoa, C. Arteaga, D. Ellis, C. H. Heath, I. Lutsar, M. Rovira, Q. Nguyen, M. Slavin, and S. C. Chen on behalf of the Global Scedosporium Study Group. 2008. Treatment of scedosporiosis with voriconazole: clinical experience with 107 patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1743-1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES