Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2010 Jun 7;150(5):637–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08252.x

Complete donor T-cell engraftment 30 days after allogeneic transplantation predicts molecular remission in high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Carol D Jones 1, Sally Arai 2, Robert Lowsky 2, Dolly B Tyan 1, James L Zehnder 1, David B Miklos 2
PMCID: PMC2935248  NIHMSID: NIHMS215415  PMID: 20528878

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is often indolent, however some patients will demonstrate an aggressive disease course. Over the last decade, it has become possible to define high-risk cohorts, using such prognostic indicators as IGHV mutation status and cytogenetics (Miklos, 2009; Hamblin et al, 1999). This advance has led to clinical trials exploring the utility of early aggressive intervention in high-risk patients, including allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT).

Recent work has demonstrated that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at one year post-transplant strongly predicts better disease-free survival at two years (Farina et al, 2009) and better overall survival at three years (Ritgen et al, 2008), and may therefore be a surrogate marker for longer term remission and an important therapeutic goal following allo-HCT for CLL. However, disease progression may occur before the one-year landmark, necessitating therapeutic intervention. Therefore, to facilitate clinical management of these patients during the first year post-transplant, we evaluated allo-HCT and CLL-associated risk factors for predictive associations to molecular remission.

Twenty-one consecutive high-risk CLL patients from two clinical trials were analysed. Patients received a reduced intensity conditioning preparative regimen consisting of total lymphoid irradiation (TLI; 80 cGy in 10 fractions) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG; total 7.5 mg/kg) (Lowsky et al, 2005; Kohrt et al, 2009). Donor peripheral blood progenitor cells were infused on d+0. Ciclosporin prophylaxis was tapered by 6 months, and mycophenolate mofetil until d+28 for related donors, d+100 for unrelated donors. Nineteen patients from one trial received rituximab (375 mg/m2); infused on d+ 56, 63, 70, and 77. Two patients from a second trial had the same preparative regimen but did not receive rituximab. Median follow-up was 19 months, with a range of 12-46 months.

The protocol and consent forms were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Stanford University Medical Center: all patients provided signed, informed consent. The studies are registered at the U.S. National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifiers NCT00234013 and NCT00185640).

Assessment of MRD in the peripheral blood (PB) was performed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using allele-specific oligonucleotides (ASO-Q-PCR) essentially as previously described (Ladetto et al, 2000), using IGHV-region consensus probes and rearranged-IGH allele-specific primers, including a complimentarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) -primer. In some cases, it was necessary to design an ASO-probe spanning the CDR3 to achieve appropriate specificity and sensitivity. The method employed absolute quantitation, and used GAPDH as an endogenous control gene to measure the input quantity of amplifiable genomic DNA and ASO-IGH plasmid standards. The sensitivity for each assay was ≤10 copies/ug. Specificity was demonstrated using several negative controls including normal tonsillar DNA as a polyclonal control. TaqMan primers and probes were designed using PrimerExpress, version 3.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). MRD assays were performed on the ABI 7700 or 7900 (Applied Biosystems). Molecular remission was defined as ≤ 30 copies/ug white blood cell-DNA (approximately1.8 × 10-4 white blood cells).

Molecular remission at d+365, as determined by Q-PCR MRD results, was compared with CLL and HCT risk factors for predictive associations. The CLL risk factors evaluated were IGHV-mutation status, unfavourable cytogenetics pre-HCT, prior alemtuzumab, and fludarabine refractoriness. The allo-HCT risk factors evaluated were lymph node > 5 cm at HCT, months from diagnosis to HCT, disease status at HCT, MRD level at HCT, number of prior treatment regimens, related vs. unrelated donor, female donor to male recipient, and time to establish complete donor engraftment of T-cells. There was no evaluation of the impact of rituximab administration because that was not randomized; 19 of 21 patients received it.

Complete donor T-cell engraftment was defined as ≥ 95% donor for CD3 in the PB, assayed by routine DNA fragment analysis of serial tandem repeat polymorphisms in bead-separated lymphocytes.

Statistical calculations were done using GraphPad Prism, version 5.0a (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Categorical variables were compared by the Fisher's exact test, while continuous variables were compared by unpaired, two-tailed t-tests and by log rank (Mantel-Cox) analyses. Significance levels were set at ≤ 0.05.

Table I shows MRD and chimerism result data for the first year for all 21 patients; 13 patients had achieved molecular remission. Disease progression had occurred in six patients, one patient showed stable disease, and 14 patients were in clinical remission.

Table I.

MRD and chimerism test results data. Grey shaded boxes show complete T-cell donor engraftment (all timepoints). Molecular remission at d+365 shown in bold. CR = clinical remission, PD = progressive disease, RT = Richter's transformation, SD = stable disease, ND = not done, Donor T-chim = donor T cell chimerism.

Case no. Donor T-chim (%)
d30
Residual Disease in PB (copies/ug DNA)
d90
Donor T-chim (%)
d90
Residual Disease in PB (copies/ug DNA)
d180
Donor T-chim (%)
d180
Residual Disease in PB (copies/ug DNA)
d365
Donor T-chim (%)
d365
Clinical status
d365
3431 100 0 100 18 100 0 100 CR
3870 97 0 99 0 100 0 100 CR
3703 99 3 100 28 100 0 100 CR
4077 97 3 99 3 99 0 99 CR
3399 96 166 100 0 100 0 100 CR
3732 95 935 99 67 99 10 99 CR
3903 100 1,197 97 25 99 25 99 CR
3934 96 5,269 100 4 100 0 100 CR
3751 92 835 99 181 99 30 99 CR
3723 97 2,735 96 24 99 19 100 CR
3835 95 0 93 ND 95 10 99 RT
3879 87 122 97 14 100 0 100 CR
3409 50 5,327 30 37 70 0 100 CR
3455 90 3,201 99 18,339 98 18,128 99 PD
3860 32 91,500 64 18,089 88 6,368 97 SD
3873 86 20,465 88 1,440 96 2,280 95 CR
3632 36 236 4 3,238 2 846 98 PD
3975 91 273 60 899 85 12,813 85 PD
3740 93 66 84 15,042 47 129,021 19 PD
3926 96 31 55 45 39 127,580 51 PD
3697 62 0 61 59 47 282 49 CR

Analyses of the disease parameters described above showed no predictive value, with the exception of complete donor engraftment. Remarkably, as shown in Figure 1, complete donor T-cell (CD3) engraftment by d+30 was a strong predictor of molecular remission by one year (p≤ 0.0008 by log rank Mantel Cox), with a positive predictive value of 90.9%

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Log-rank analysis comparing patients with and without complete donor T-cell engraftment (T chim) at d+30 post-HCT by percent of each group in molecular remission. Full donor CD3 engraftment at day 30 predicts molecular remission by one year post-transplantation, p=0.0008.

The utility of parallel assessments of chimerism and MRD in predicting relapse in allo-HCT with reduced-intensity conditioning has been shown but remains controversial due to contradictory reports (Pérez-Simón et al, 2002; Pulsipher et al, 2008). However, in our cohort of high-risk CLL patients treated on this protocol, complete donor T-cell engraftment at d+30 was an early predictor of molecular remission at d+365, a surrogate marker for longer-term remission as described above.

This predictive association improves disease stratification such that patients who show mixed T-cell chimerism at d+30 can be more closely monitored and perhaps treated earlier. While the mechanism of the association of complete donor T cell engraftment and molecular remission is not definitively known, T-cells are important contributors in the graft-versus-leukaemia (GvL) effect (Levenga et al, 2007). While patients with other diseases, such as acute myeloid leukaemia may already be cured by chemotherapy before allo-HCT, CLL patients are not cured by chemotherapy, and in the absence of effective GvL activity by the graft, CLL will recur. Accordingly, patients who do not achieve complete donor chimersim may have an inadequate GvL response, resulting in a higher risk of disease recurrence.

In conclusion, our analysis has identified that complete donor T-cell engraftment at d+30 following TLI-ATG allogeneic conditioning is a strong predictor for achieving molecular remission by one-year post-transplant. While confirmatory studies with other treatment regimens are required, monitoring donor T-cell engraftment status at d+30 may be an important treatment parameter indicating the likelihood of molecular remission by one-year post allo-HCT in CLL.

Acknowledgments

We thank Renee Letsinger for her support, particularly in clinical data management. This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health grant 2P01CA049605-19 and by Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Translational Research Award 6204-06.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: There are no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose for any of the authors.

Some of this data was presented in abstract form at the 50th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, San Francisco, CA, December 8, 2008: Jones C, Letsinger R, Zehnder JL, Miklos D. Complete Donor Chimerism Predicts Molecular Remission in High Risk CLL Following Nonmyeloablative Transplantation [abstract]. Blood. 2008;112: 3283.

References

  1. Farina L, Carniti C, Dodero A, Vendramin A, Raganato A, Spina F, Patriarca F, Narni F, Benedetti F, Olivieri A, Corradini P. Qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction monitoring of minimal residual disease in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: early assessment can predict long-term outcome after reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation. Haematologica. 2009;94:654–662. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.000273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardiner A, Oscier DG, Stevenson FK. Unmutated Ig V(H) genes are associated with a more aggressive form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999;94:1848–1854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kohrt HE, Turnbull BB, Heydari K, Shizuru JA, Laport GG, Miklos DB, Johnston LJ, Arai S, Weng WK, Hoppe RT, Lavori PW, Blume KG, Negrin RS, Strober S, Lowsky R. TLI and ATG conditioning with low risk of graft-versus-host disease retains antitumor reactions after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors. Blood. 2009;114:1099–1109. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ladetto M, Donovan JW, Harig S, Trojan A, Poor C, Schlossnan R, Anderson KC, Gribben JG. Real-Time polymerase chain reaction of immunoglobulin rearrangements for quantitative evaluation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:241–253. doi: 10.1016/s1083-8791(00)70006-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levenga H, Woestenenk R, Schattenberg AV, Maas F, Jansen JH, Raymakers R, De Mulder PH, van de Wiel-van Kemenade E, Schaap N, de Witte T, Dolstra H. Dynamics in chimerism of T cells and dendritic cells in relapsed CML patients and the influence on the induction of alloreactivity following donor lymphocyte infusion. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:585–592. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lowsky R, Takahashi T, Liu YP, Dejbakhsh-Jones S, Grumet FC, Shizuru JA, Laport GG, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Johnston LJ, Hoppe RT, Bloch DA, Blume KG, Negrin RS, Strober S. Protective conditioning for acute graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Me. 2005;353:1321–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miklos DB. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. In: Appelbaum FR, Forman SJ, Negrin RS, Blume KG, editors. Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. 4th. United Kingdom: Blackwell; 2009. pp. 897–913. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pérez-Simón JA, Caballero D, Diez-Campelo M, Lopez-Pérez R, Mateos G, Cañizo C, Vazquez L, Vidriales B, Mateos MV, Gonzalez M, San Miguel JF. Chimerism and minimal residual disease monitoring after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic transplantation. Leukemia. 2002;16:1423–1431. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pulsipher MA, Bader P, Klingebiel T, Cooper LJ. Allogeneic transplantation for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the emerging role of peritransplantation minimal residual disease/chimerism monitoring and novel chemotherapeutic, molecular, and immune approaches aimed at preventing relapse. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;15 (1 Suppl):62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ritgen M, Böttcher S, Stilgenbauer S, Bunjes D, Schubert J, Cohen S, Humpe A, Hallek M, Kneba M, Schmitz N, Döhner H, Dreger P, German CLL Study Group Quantitative MRD monitoring identifies distinct GVL response patterns after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the GCLLSG CLL3X trial. Leukemia. 2008;22:1377–1386. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES