Abstract
A macrocyclic dinuclear copper complex, [Cu2II(1)Br4]·2H2O has been synthesized and characterized by X-ray crystallography, in which each metal ion is pentacoordinated in a square pyramidal environment and the macrocycle is folded to form a boat-shaped empty cavity. As studied by an indicator displacement assay, the dinuclear complex shows strong selectivity for phosphate over sulfate, nitrate, perchlorate and halides in water at physiological pH.
While there has been an increasing interest in anion binding with a diverse variety of synthetic receptors, selective recognition of biologically relevant anions still remains a challenge in water particularly at physiological pH.1 Phosphate is a fundamental building block of living systems, for example, nucleic acids, nucleotides and nucleosides, and plays a crucial role in many biochemical processes. It is known that phosphate exists as both H2PO4− and HPO42− at physiological pH.2 However, the high free energy of hydration (ΔG0 = −465 mol−1) often makes difficult it to design a selective receptor for this anion in water.3 Therefore, the development of selective phosphate binding receptors particularly in water at neutral pH is highly desirable. Neutral receptors, such as amides,4 thioamides,5 urea,6 thiourea,7 pyrroles8 and indoles9 are well documented systems for anion binding, however, their applications are limited to non-aqueous solvents due to the poor solubility in water. An obvious approach is to use water soluble polyamines to bind phosphate, but their anion binding ability is largely dependent on electrostatic interactions which require low pH.10 Another strategy is to use metal complexes,11 for example, cryptand-based dinuclear metal complexes that were employed by Nelson12 and Fabbrizzi13 as selective receptors for different anions providing vacant axial sites to coordinate anions through electrostatic interactions. The distance as well as coordination geometry of the two metal centers are the dominant factors for the selectivity of an anion.
Monocycle-based polyamines have the potential to incorporate two metal ions, which can be applied for anion detection by using an indicator displacement assay originally introduced by Anslyn in the development of sensors.14 In this case, a sensor, formed by a synthetic receptor and an indicator, can display a detectable signal due to the removal of the indicator upon the complexation with an anion.15 During the course of our work in anion binding studies, we obtained a crystal of a macrocycle-based synthetic receptor with two copper ions, providing a boat-shaped empty cavity, which we used for the detection of anions using fluorescent indicator-displacement assay (Scheme 1). Our preliminary results indicate that the sensor shows very high affinity and selectivity for H2PO4− in water at physiological pH.
Scheme 1.
Schematic of the chemosensor displacing a dye upon the complexation of dihydrogen phosphate.
The ligand 1 was prepared from the high dilution condensation reactions of an equimolar methyl-2,2′-diaminodiethylamine and 2,5-thiophenedicarbaldehyde followed by NaBH4 reduction in methanol.16 The dinuclear copper(II) complex (L) was prepared by adding two equivalents of CuBr2 to 1 in methanol (Scheme 2). The precipitate formed was collected and the crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of a water solution of the complex.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of [Cu2II(1) Br4]·2H2O
The X-ray analysis17 of the complex reveals that the macrocycle contains two Cu(II) ions at both N3 sites. Each Cu(II) is coordinated with three macrocyclic nitrogens and two bromides to provide a square pyramidal geometry. The macrocycle is folded to form a boat-like structure with an empty cavity (Figure 1), with the Cu–Cu distance of 6.243 Å. The Cu–Brequatorial distances are 2.3390(17) and 2.3764(16) Å for Cu1–Br1 and Cu2–Br2, respectively, while Cu–Braxial distances are 2.9461(18) and 2.9714(18) Å for Cu1–Br3 and Cu2–Br3i, respectively. The longer distances in Cu–Braxial are due to the Jahn-Teller distortion.11b The Cu–N distances, which range from 2.001(8) to 2.054 (8) Å, are comparable to the corresponding Cu–N distances (1.973(5) to 2.056(5) Å) observed in m-xylyl-based macrocycle.12 One bromide (Br4) remains outside the cavity and does not interact with the macrocycle. As seen in Figure 1A, both copper centers are available to accommodate a suitable anion within the macrocyclic cavity. The macrocycles are connected through the axial bromides to form a linear chain along the b axis (Figure 2). The Cu–Br–Cu angles are nearly linear [171.74°]. In this linear chain, the cavities are faced to the same side.
Figure 1.
Crystal structure of [Cu2II(1)Br4]·2H2O: side view(A) and view down the Cu–Cu axis (B). Water molecules are not shown for clarity.
Figure 2.
View down the b axis showing a linear chain of macrocycles.
In order to evaluate the anion binding ability of the dinuclear ligand (L), an indicator displacement assay was performed using Eosine Y (EY) fluorescent dye. Upon the increasing addition of L (5.0×10−5 M) to a solution of EY (1.0×10−7 M) buffered at pH 7.0 (0.05 M HEPES), the fluorescence intensity of EY gradually decreased, resulting in an almost complete quenching of the emission with 50 equivalents of L (Figure 3). Such quenching is due to the formation of an ion-pair between L and the anionic dye, as expected.15 The change in the fluorescence intensity gave the best fit of a 1:1 binding model,18 yielding the binding constant log K= 5.9.
Figure 3.
The decrease of fluorescence intensity of the indicator (EY) upon the addition of L. [EY]0 = 1×10−7 M, [L]0 = 5.0×10−5 M. Excitation = 470 nm. Inset shows the plot of I/Io against the equivalents of L at the wavelength of 537 nm. HEPES (0.05 M) in water buffered at pH = 7.0 was used as a solvent.
The receptor-dye complex was then examined for different inorganic anions, such as halides, nitrate, sulfate, phosphate, and perchlorate. In a typical titration, aliquots of the corresponding sodium salt in water (2.5×10−3 M) were added to a solution (2 mL) containing 2.5×10−5M of L and 5×10−6 M of EY (dye:L = 1:5). All the solutions were buffered at pH 7.0 using 0.05 M HEPES in water. Upon the addition of H2PO4− to L-EY solution, the fluorescence intensity was found to increase, indicating the displacement of the dye (EY) from the receptor-dye ion-pair to the solution. The addition of 20 equivalents of the anion resulted to a significant enhancement of fluorescence intensity (Figure 4). The titration profile again gave the best fit of a 1:1 binding model.18 The calculated binding constant log K was found to be 4.1.
Figure 4.
The enhancement of fluorescence intensity of the indicator EY-receptor ion-pair upon the addition of phosphate. EY-receptor solution (dye : complex = 1:5) was prepared mixing EY (5×10−6 M) and L (2.5 ×10−5 M). [H2PO4− ]0 = 2.5×10−3 M. Excitation = 470 nm. Inset shows the plot of I/Io against the equivalents of H2PO4− at 537 nm. HEPES (0.05 M) in water buffered at pH = 7.0 was used as a solvent.
It is remarkable that under the identical condition, the addition of other anions including fluoride, chloride, bromide, iodide, sulfate, nitrate and perchlorate to the receptor-dye complex, did not result in any enhancement of the fluorescent intensity (Figure 5). This observation suggests that the dye was not displaced due to the weak or negligible affinity of the receptor-dye complex for these anions. A slight decrease in intensity in some cases, such as fluoride, nitrate and iodide, can be attributed to the simple dilution effect with the added anionic solution.
Figure 5.
The plot of I/Io against the equivalents of different inorganic anions at at 537 nm.
In summary, we have synthesized and structurally characterized a new macrocycle-based dinuclear complex, providing a boat-shaped empty cavity which has been successfully employed in an indicator displacement approach to detect phosphate in water at physiological pH. The strong selectivity of the receptor for phosphate could be due to the interaction of the charged phosphate ion with the pentacoordinated metal ions within the cavity which is well shaped to wrap the anion. The system described herein does not show any affinity for other common inorganic anions, but is able to selectively detect dihydrogen phosphate in water.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The project described was supported by Grant Number G12RR013459 from the National Center for Research Resources. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under CHE-0821357. The authors thank the National Science Foundation (CHE-0130835) and the University of Oklahoma for funds to acquire the diffractometer used in this work.
Footnotes
Crystallographic file in CIF format. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at doi:xxxxxx.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.(a) Han MS, Kim DH. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:3809–3811. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021018)41:20<3809::AID-ANIE3809>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (a) Bowman-James K. Acc Chem Res. 2005;38:671–678. doi: 10.1021/ar040071t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gale PA. Acc Chem Res. 2006;39:465–475. doi: 10.1021/ar040237q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Caltagirone C, Gale PA. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:520–563. doi: 10.1039/b806422a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cormode DP, Murray SS, Cowley AR, Beer PD. Dalton Trans. 2006:5135–5141. doi: 10.1039/b609817g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dickins RS, Parker D. In: Macrocyclic Chemistry: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Gloe K, editor. Springer; 2005. p. 122. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bruce JI, Dickins RS, Govenlock LJ, Gunnlaugsson T, Lopinski S, Lowe MP, Parker D, Peacock RD, Perry JJB, Aime S, Botta M. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:9674–9684. [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Bondy CR, Loeb SJ. Coord Chem Rev. 2003;240:77–99. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kang SO, Hossain MA, Bowman-James K. Coord Chem Rev. 2006;250:3038–3052. [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Hossain MA, Kang SK, Llinares LM, Powell D, Bowman-James K. Inorg Chem. 2003;42:5043–5045. doi: 10.1021/ic034735r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Inoue Y, Kanbara T, Yamamoto T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:5167–5169. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Brooks SJ, Caltagirone C, Cossins AJ, Gale PA, Light M. Supramol Chem. 2008;20:349–355. [Google Scholar]; (b) Pérez-Casas C, Yatsimirsky AK. J Org Chem. 2008;73:2275–2284. doi: 10.1021/jo702458f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Lorenzo A, Aller E, Molina P. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:1397–1401. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sessler JL, Cho DG, Stepien M, Lynch V, Waluk J, Yoon ZS, Kim D. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:12640–12641. doi: 10.1021/ja064675z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Jiang Q-Q, Darhkijav B, Liu H, Wang F, Li Z, Jiang Y-B. Chemistry - An Asian Journal. 2010;5(3):543–549. doi: 10.1002/asia.200900519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu WX, Yang R, Li AF, Li Z, Gao YF, Luo XX, Ruan YB, Jiang YB. Organic and Biomol Chem. 2009;7:4021–4028. doi: 10.1039/b910255h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Kim J, Juwarker H, Liu X, Lah MS, Jeong KS. Chem Commun. 2010;46:764–766. doi: 10.1039/b919519j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ju J, Park M, Suk J-m, Lah MS, Jeong K-S. Chem Commun. 2008:3546–3548. doi: 10.1039/b804284e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gale PA, Hiscock JR, Jie CZ, Hursthouse MB, Light ME. Chem Sci. 2010 doi: 10.1039/c0sc00202j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Gerasimchuk OA, Mason S, Llinares AM, Song M, Alcock NW, Bowman-James K. Inorg Chem. 2000;39:1371–1375. doi: 10.1021/ic9911116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) García-España E, Díaz P, Llinares JM, Bianchi A. Coord Chem Rev. 2006;250:2952–2986. [Google Scholar]; (b) Mateus P, Delgado R, Brandao P, Carvalho S, Felix V. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:4661–4673. doi: 10.1039/b912940e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.O’Neil EJ, Smith BD. Coord Chem Rev. 2006;250:3068–3080. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harding CJ, Mabbs FE, MacInnes EJL, McKee V, Nelson J. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans. 1996:3227–3230. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Amendola V, Bastianello E, Fabbrizzi L, Mangano C, Pallavicini P, Perotti A, Manotti Lanfredi A, Ugozzoli F. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:2917–2920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lavigne JL, Anslyn EV. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:3666–3669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Nguyen BT, Anslyn EV. Coord Chem Rev. 2006;250:3118–3127. [Google Scholar]; (b) Amendola V, Bastianello E, Fabbrizzi L, Mangano C, Pallavicini P, Perotti A, Manotti-Lanfredi A, Ugozzoli F. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:2917–2920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Fabbrizzi L, Marcotte N, Stomeo F, Taglietti A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:3811–3814. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021018)41:20<3811::AID-ANIE3811>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Hanshaw RG, Hilkert SM, Jiang H, Smith BD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:8721–8724. [Google Scholar]; (e) Lee DH, Son SU, Hong JI. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:4777–4780. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Tang L, Park J, Kim HJ, Kim Y, Kim SJ, Chin J, Kim KM. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12606–12607. doi: 10.1021/ja804753n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saeed MA, Powell DR, Fronczek FR, Hossain MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:4233–4236. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crystal data for L: C22H38Br4Cu2N6S2·2(H2O), M = 933.46, triclinic, a = 7.988(2) Å, b = 9.116(3) Å, c = 11.625(3) Å, α = 86.690(6)°, β = 73.837(14)°, γ = 80.279(12)°, V = 801.3(4) Å3, T = 100(2) K, space group P1, Z = 1, 25560 reflections measured, 3941 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0679). The final R1 values were 0.0474 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) value was 0.1008 (I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 value was 0.0644 (all data). The final wR(F2) value was 0.1060 (all data). CCDC 782240.
- 18.Schneider HJ, Kramer R, Simova S, Schneider U. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:6442–6448. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







