Skip to main content
Journal of Lipid Research logoLink to Journal of Lipid Research
. 2010 Oct;51(10):2929–2939. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M005686

Localization of genes for V+LDL plasma cholesterol levels on two diets in the opossum Monodelphis domestica[S]

Candace M Kammerer *,1, David L Rainwater , Nicolas Gouin §, Madhuri Jasti **, Kory C Douglas **, Amy S Dressen *, Prasanth Ganta **, John L VandeBerg †,††, Paul B Samollow **
PMCID: PMC2936748  PMID: 20650928

Abstract

Plasma cholesterol levels among individuals vary considerably in response to diet. However, the genes that influence this response are largely unknown. Non-HDL (V+LDL) cholesterol levels vary dramatically among gray, short-tailed opossums fed an atherogenic diet, and we previously reported that two quantitative trait loci (QTLs) influenced V+LDL cholesterol on two diets. We used hypothesis-free, genome-wide linkage analyses on data from 325 pedigreed opossums and located one QTL for V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet on opossum chromosome 1q [logarithm of the odds (LOD) = 3.11, genomic P = 0.019] and another QTL for V+LDL on the atherogenic diet (i.e., high levels of cholesterol and fat) on chromosome 8 (LOD = 9.88, genomic P = 5 × 10−9). We then employed a novel strategy involving combined analyses of genomic resources, expression analysis, sequencing, and genotyping to identify candidate genes for the chromosome 8 QTL. A polymorphism in ABCB4 was strongly associated (P = 9 × 10−14) with the plasma V+LDL cholesterol concentrations on the high-cholesterol, high-fat diet. The results of this study indicate that genetic variation in ABCB4, or closely linked genes, is responsible for the dramatic differences among opossums in their V+LDL cholesterol response to an atherogenic diet.

Keywords: very low plus low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, diet, genes, animal model, comparative synteny


Plasma lipoprotein phenotypes, especially HDL and LDL cholesterol levels, represent major risk factors for development of atherosclerosis. Several environmental factors, such as diet and exercise, exert important effects on lipoprotein phenotypes, but genetic effects also play a role (1). Using data from human families and animal models of cardiovascular disease, researchers have identified both common, e.g., APOE (2), and uncommon, e.g., PCSK9 (3), variants in candidate genes that influence plasma lipoprotein cholesterol levels. With the development of databases of genetic variation in humans (HapMap, www.hapmap.org), as well as high-throughput genotyping methods, recent genome-wide association analyses of large studies comprising ∼20,000 individuals have revealed additional genes that influence plasma lipoprotein levels, especially plasma HDL and LDL cholesterol levels [e.g., (4, 5)]. Taken together, these common genetic variants only account for a small proportion of the known heritable variation in HDL and LDL plasma cholesterol levels, resulting in a phenomenon referred to as the “missing heritability” (6). Some of this missing heritability may result from the effects of genotype-by-environment interactions. Given the known effects of diet on atherogenesis, as well as the wide variation among individuals in response to dietary components, identification of specific genotype-by-diet interaction effects is critical for a deeper understanding of the biological pathways involved, as well as assessment of individual risk (7). Although studies of possible genotype-by-diet effects on lipid levels have been performed (8), results have been inconsistent, most likely due to relatively small sample sizes or difficulties in measuring dietary components in human populations.

For many of these gaps in our knowledge base, a valid animal model can provide valuable insights. While an animal model may not precisely replicate human metabolism in every detail, effects of specific genes or pathways can be isolated under controlled and consistent conditions, a feature that is required to adequately characterize genotype-by-diet interactions. The gray, short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica, is potentially an excellent candidate for this purpose: it is small, reaches sexual maturity in 5–6 months, breeds year-round, has large litters (mean size, eight), is maintained in colonies in at least seven countries, and is used in a variety of research areas, including comparative immunogenetics, neurobiology, carcinogenesis, endocrinology, fetal development, meiotic recombination, and more (9). In particular, lipoprotein metabolism in opossums is similar to human metabolism in many respects. For example, antibodies directed against human apolipoprotein B (apoB) and apoE cross-react with the equivalent opossum proteins (10). Furthermore, metabolic and expression studies indicate that aspects of cholesterol absorption, synthesis, and excretion are similar to humans (11, 12). We also have observed heritability of key aspects of lipoprotein phenotypes that are similar to humans and, in particular, have observed a striking inter-individual difference in non-HDL (V+LDL) cholesterol response to a high-cholesterol, high-fat (HCHF) diet (13). The V+LDL response largely involves increases of cholesterol rather than triglyceride levels [∼30-fold vs. ∼1.6-fold increases, respectively (14)], and the increase in V+LDL cholesterol is elicited by high dietary cholesterol alone but not high fat alone (although the V+LDL response to dietary cholesterol is amplified when dietary fat is also present). In contrast, HDL cholesterol increases in response to dietary fat, and these responses are similar to those seen in other species, including primates (14). We previously reported evidence that plasma levels of HDL cholesterol and V+LDL cholesterol on the basal and HCHF diets are under the control of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that account for a large proportion of the variation in HDL and V+LDL cholesterol in our population of animals (13). We hypothesized that the metabolic basis for this interaction with diet replicates a similar mechanism in humans and that it may underlie an important component of cardiovascular risk in humans associated with these highly atherogenic lipoproteins.

Recently, the opossum genome was sequenced (15) and we developed a genetic linkage map for this species composed largely of microsatellite markers (16). In the present study, we used these resources to map two of the previously detected QTLs onto the M. domestica genome and conduct comparative synteny analyses to derive a group of positional candidate genes, followed by a literature survey to identify high-priority candidates. We then analyzed the expression of these genes in liver (because of its central role in lipid metabolism), sequenced them to detect variants, and genotyped variants in and near the candidate genes in our study population in an effort to identify the QTL influencing V+LDL cholesterol response to the HCHF diet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

The opossums used in this study were bred and raised at the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research (SFBR), San Antonio, Texas, which is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. The origins of the laboratory population of M. domestica and the husbandry conditions have been described (17). All experimental protocols were approved by the SFBR Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Plasma and DNA samples were collected from 331 animals (164 males and 167 females) in seven pedigrees (sizes = 106, 89, 84, 36, 10, 3, 3) comprising 28 partially inbred “parent” animals (14 males and 14 females) and their first- and second-generation offspring (see supplementary Fig. I). The 28 parents for these pedigrees were members of the offspring generation from the population studied in an earlier report on the inheritance of lipoprotein cholesterol (13), and their average inbreeding coefficient was 0.50. The first-generation offspring of the 28 parent animals were then mated (one brother with multiple sisters) to produce full-sibship litters within large half-sibships (the second generation). The power of genetic analyses to detect and locate QTLs depends in part on the numbers of different pairs of relatives. For example, in these pedigrees, we have 202 parent-offspring, 308 full-sibling, 168 half-sibling, 158 grandparent-grandchild, and numerous more-distant relationships.

Experimental protocol

All animals were maintained from weaning age on the basal diet, a commercial pelleted fox food diet, which is the standard for this species and which has moderate levels of fat and cholesterol [10.0% and 0.16% of dry weight, respectively (14); see supplementary Table I]. At approximately 5 months of age, animals were fasted overnight and bled via heart puncture while under methoxyflurane-induced anesthesia. Next, they were fed an HCHF diet enriched in fat (from lard) and cholesterol [(18.8% and 0.71% dry weight, respectively (14); see supplementary Table I]. After 8 weeks on the HCHF diet, the animals again were fasted overnight and bled.

Measurement of HDL and V+LDL cholesterol concentrations

From each of the basal and HCHF diet blood samples, EDTA plasma was prepared by low-speed centrifugation and cooled on ice, and plasma cholesterol concentrations were measured enzymatically using a clinical chemistry analyzer and commercial reagents (reagents from Boehringer-Mannheim Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN; calibrators from Polestar Labs, Escondido, CA). When the measurement exceeded that of the highest calibrator (9.25 mmol/l), the sample was diluted with saline to bring it into range. HDL cholesterol concentrations were measured in the supernatant after precipitation of apoB-containing lipoproteins with heparin-Mg2+ (18); V+LDL cholesterol was calculated as the difference between total and HDL cholesterol levels.

Polymorphisms and genotyping

DNA was prepared from liver collected from the 303 first- and second-generation offspring using the Wizard SV 96 Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega). All 303 animals were genotyped for 74 anonymous microsatellite markers and a microsatellite within the TDT (terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase) gene. The map positions of these 75 markers are known from the opossum BBBX linkage map that comprises more than 330 autosomal and X-chromosome-linked loci (16; unpublished observations). Supplemental Table II lists references for the 42 previously published markers and gives descriptions and genotyping methods for the 33 marker systems described here for the first time. Genotyping was then performed on ABI 3100 or ABI 3730XL genetic analysis platforms (19, 20). Quality control procedures were similar to those previously described (21).

Although the total number of base pairs in the opossum genome is similar to that of humans (15), the overall meiotic map length is comparatively small, ∼867 cM (21). Therefore, initial genotyping was conducted for 66 marker loci across the eight autosomes: mean intermarker distance on each chromosome ranged from 12 to 17 cM. To further clarify the locations of the putative QTLs, we genotyped an additional nine markers in the QTL regions of interest; the locations of all 75 markers are given in supplementary Table II.

Statistical genetic analyses

All plasma cholesterol distributions were nonnormal. To reduce nonnormality prior to genetic analysis (22), V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet was transformed by square-root, whereas V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet and HDL cholesterol on both diets were transformed by natural logarithms. In addition, extreme outliers (±4 SD) were removed.

Heritabilities of plasma cholesterol levels were estimated using maximum likelihood variance components methods, in which phenotypic variation was modeled as follows:

yi=μ+i=1nβjXij+gi+ei,

where yi is the plasma cholesterol level for the ith individual, μ is mean cholesterol level, Xij is the jth covariate for the ith individual, βj is the corresponding regression coefficient, gi is the additive genetic effect, and ei is the residual error effect, which includes unmeasured environmental and nonadditive genetic components. Residual heritability, h2r, is the proportion of total trait variance due to the additive genetic component after adjusting for environmental covariates. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess the significance of model parameters by comparing the full model (all covariates and additive genetic effects) with a nested model lacking a specific parameter (23). Because V+LDL on the HCHF diet was bimodal, the effects of sex, age, and weight were assessed within each modal group.

Two-point and multipoint linkage scans were performed using the variance components method, which extends the above model by including the effect of a putative QTL, σ2QTL, as a component of variance (23). Maximum likelihood methods were used to estimate σ2QTL based on the expected covariance between relatives due to their identity by descent (IBD) at a given marker (two-point analyses) or at an arbitrary chromosomal location (multipoint analyses) in tight linkage with the presumed QTL. Multipoint IBD probabilities were estimated at 1 cM (Haldane) intervals from map positions 89–200 cM on chromosome 1 (Mdo 1) and 0–110 cM on Mdo 8 using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, as implemented in Loki (24). The likelihood ratio test was used to compare the linkage model to the polygenic (i.e., no linkage, σ2QTL = 0) model, and results were reported as the log10 of the likelihood ratio [logarithm of the odds (LOD) score]. Genetic analyses were performed using SOLAR software (23).

After identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in high-priority candidate genes (see following section) pedigree-based association analyses were performed to test whether SNP genotypes were associated with V+LDL cholesterol. Specifically, we tested whether the full model (containing parameters for two SNPs) differed from a nested model in which parameters for one or both SNPs were removed. If the nested model does not significantly differ from the full model, then the nested model is accepted as the better (or “best”) model because it describes the data as well as the full model with fewer parameters. If the nested model differs significantly from the full model, then the full model is better. We also performed multipoint linkage scans while incorporating the candidate gene marker as a covariate in the model. If no significant evidence for a QTL remained after inclusion of the marker as a covariate, i.e., LOD score <3.0, we interpreted this result to indicate that a variant (or haplotype) near the marker might be causal. Plots and histograms were created in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Identification of potential candidate genes in QTL regions

We used three unbiased, complementary approaches to identify a list of possible candidate genes in QTL regions of interest, i.e., genomic regions near QTLs that might influence V+LDL cholesterol on the basal and HCHF diets. First, we obtained the current annotated list of genes in the regions of interest from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Opossum Genome Browser Gateway (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway). The opossum genome is extensively annotated; however, it contains many predicted genes of unknown identity (“novel genes”) that are likely to have orthologs or paralogs in corresponding regions of the human genome that were not identified by the automated gene prediction algorithms (25). Second, to construct a more comprehensive catalog of genes likely to be present in the QTL regions of interest, we employed a comparative synteny strategy to identify comparable (homologous) regions in the much more thoroughly annotated human genome assembly. Specifically, we utilized the comparative synteny features of the Ensembl Opossum Genome browser (http://www.ensembl.org/Monodelphis_domestica/Info/Index) and UCSC Opossum Genome Browser Gateway to first determine the regions of the human genome that are homologous to the stretch of opossum genome contained within each QTL candidate region. We then used the Biomart feature of Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/bc3dd7b7a5f66472ea30409b20483b62) to determine the annotated gene content and chromosome assembly coordinates for each gene within those homologous regions of the human genome corresponding to the opossum QTL regions. This output was compared with the most recent human genome annotation at the UCSC browser (GRCh37). Wherever the UCSC data set contained a gene prediction not present in Ensembl Biomart output, this gene and its assembly coordinates were merged into the Biomart-based list to produce a comprehensive list of all genes and their genomic locations in the human homologous regions corresponding to the opossum QTL regions. Third, we used two public databases to identify a set of genes that had been tested for association with LDL cholesterol levels in at least one human population. We searched the National Human Genome Research Institute Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies (http://www.genome.gov/26525384) using the search term “LDL cholesterol” and listed all genes that were significantly associated (at a genome level of significance) with LDL cholesterol. We also searched the HuGE Navigator (http://www.hugenavigator.net/), a database of results from tests of associations between candidate genes and various traits in humans, using the “Phenopedia” option and the search term “Lipid Metabolism Disorders”; this database contains both positive and negative results. From these two databases, we obtained a list of 224 genes potentially associated with LDL metabolism in humans. To obtain the unbiased list of potential positional candidate genes for the V+LDL QTL on each diet, we merged this list of 224 genes with the comprehensive list of opossum homologs of human genes in the QTL regions of interest. Finally, to identify a subset of high-priority candidate genes from this unbiased list of positional candidate genes, we further assessed the published literature for the specific effects or associations of these genes with LDL-related traits in humans and animal models.

Expression and sequencing of high-priority candidate genes

From the 303 offspring, we identified 12 (6 male and 6 female) opossums with low and 12 (6 male and 6 female) with high V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet, for which we also had stored liver samples. Low and high responders had V+LDL cholesterol <0.3 or >2.2 mmol/l (ln-transformed), respectively (see Fig. 1). These animals had liver samples collected immediately after the HCHF diet bleed (6 high and 6 low) or had liver samples collected after subsequently being fed the basal diet for 8–12 weeks (6 high and 6 low). Within each responder-by-diet group, animals were chosen to represent at least three different pedigrees (see supplementary Table III). Total RNA was extracted from the liver tissue of the 24 animals using the TRI-Reagent protocol (Molecular Research Center, Inc.). RNA extracts were DNase treated with the DNA-free Kit (Ambion) and used to synthesize double-stranded cDNA utilizing the SMARTer cDNA Synthesis Kit (Ambion). cDNA concentrations were determined using a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of V+LDL cholesterol levels on the basal and high-cholesterol, high-fat (HCHF) diets after transformation by square root (sqrt) and natural logarithms, respectively.

Expression assays were conducted for opossum homologs of the high-priority candidate genes (ABCB1, ABCB4, INSIG1) and a ubiquitously expressed housekeeping gene, GAPDH, as a control for standardization. The Ensembl-predicted annotations for these genes were used to design forward and reverse PCR primers using PRIMER3.0 software (see supplementary Table IV). Twenty-five nanograms of cDNA were used to conduct real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays, and the PCR products were detected on a high-throughput gene quantification platform, LightCycler® 480 (Roche). Each reaction was performed in duplicate to confirm results, and the duplicate measures of relative abundance (i.e., threshold cycle or CT, values) were averaged. For each assay in each animal, we obtained ΔCT (=CT gene − CT GAPDH) and tested for mean differences in ΔCT between the high and low responders on each diet using t-tests (26). With this sample size, we had 80% power at P < 0.05 to detect 2–5 unit differences in mean ΔCT, that is, 4-32 fold expression differences, given the standard deviation for the assays ranging from 1–3 units.

The cDNA sequences of INSIG1, ABCB1, and ABCB4 from five high and five low responders (see supplementary Table III) were inspected for SNP discovery. Overlapping primer sets for cDNA sequencing were designed for each gene (see supplementary Table V) and ordered from Bioneer, Inc. Twenty nanograms of cDNA was used as template for PCR with conditions optimized for each primer set. To minimize PCR products resulting from nonspecific priming, all PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and gel purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). Subsequent PCR was conducted to amplify the gel-purified PCR products, and the resulting second PCR products were again purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The forward primer of each primer set was then used to perform DNA sequencing on an ABI 3730 or ABI 3130 DNA analyzer platform using the manufacturer's specifications. All sequence data were viewed, aligned, and assembled using Sequencher4.9© software (Gene Codes Corp.). Regions of ABCB4 and INSIG1 cDNAs bearing putative SNPs were resequenced using the reverse primer to verify the allelic variants.

Genotyping polymorphisms in ABCB4 and INSIG1

All offspring were genotyped for polymorphisms in ABCB4 and near INSIG1. For ABCB4, the Ile235Leu SNP was genotyped using restriction site-generating PCR (RG-PCR) (27). Specifically, we generated an artificial Hpy188I restriction site in the A-bearing amplimer by creating a base mismatch near the 3′ end of the forward primer flanking the SNP site. Primers used for ABCB4 RG-PCR were F: 5′-TCCCTAAATATTTGGGTTTTATTGTTATTTCAG-3′ and R: 5′-CACCGTCTTAATGGCAGACA-3′; where F is the mismatch primer. This primer design renders the A-bearing amplimer, but not the T-bearing amplimer, susceptible to Hpy188I digestion, resulting in an artificial restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP). The RFLP was visualized by electrophoresis of restriction digests on 4% NuSieve 3:1 agarose gels (FMC BioProducts) stained with ethidium bromide. We were unable to design a reliable genotyping strategy for the INSIG1 Arg24Gly SNP; thus, we developed a microsatellite polymorphism (8M706) that was ∼8 kb upstream from INSIG1 as a marker for the INSIG1 region. Methods for 8M706 follow those described for the other microsatellites used in this study (see supplementary Table II).

RESULTS

Means and heritability of cholesterol levels on two diets

Plasma cholesterol levels were available for 325 animals (163 males and 162 females) with mean age at baseline equal to 161 days (range = 110 – 225 days) and mean weight (±SD) equal to 68 ± 18 g on the basal diet and 77 ± 20 g after 8 weeks on the HCHF diet. On the basal diet, mean (±SD) HDL and V+LDL cholesterol levels were 1.29 ± 0.23 mmol/l and 0.5 ± 0.19 mmol/l, respectively; whereas after 8 weeks on the HCHF diet, they increased to 1.83 ± 0.56 mmol/l and 11.11 ± 12.7 mmol/l, respectively (Table 1). Plasma cholesterol levels were transformed prior to genetic analyses, and these transformations revealed the striking bimodality for natural logarithm-transformed V+LDL levels (in ln mmol/l) on the HCHF diet (Fig. 1), as has been previously reported (13).

TABLE 1.

Means (untransformed) and residual heritabilities (hr2) of HDL and V+LDL cholesterol levels on two diets

Trait N Mean ± SD Range Variance Due to Covariates hr2 P
mmol/l %
Basal diet
 HDL 325 1.29 ± 0.23 0.80 – 2.43 0.039 0.53 ± 0.12 10−10
 V+LDL 325 0.50 ± 0.19 0.05 – 1.40 0.076 0.38 ± 0.12 10−7
HCHF diet
 HDL 319 1.83 ± 0.56 0.72 – 4.13 0.121 0.13 ± 0.09 0.001
 V+LDL 319 11.11 ± 12.7 0.0 – 61.86 0.0 0.67 ± 0.11 10−11

HCHF, high-cholesterol, high-fat.

We next estimated the heritability and the effects of age, sex, and weight on the four plasma cholesterol traits. Compared with males, females had higher HDL on the basal diet and the HCHF diet (P = 0.0009 and 10−9, respectively) and lower V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet (P = 0.001); however, there was no difference between sexes for V+LDL on the HCHF diet (see supplementary Table VI). V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet decreased with increasing age and age2 (P = 0.003 for both), but age did not influence any other trait. Weight was not significant for any trait. The significant covariates accounted for 0–12% of the total variation for each trait (Table 1). Residual heritabilities (h2r) ranged from 0.13 to 0.67, Table 1) and were highly significant for HDL and V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet and V+LDL on the HCHF diet. On the other hand, residual heritability was low for HDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet (h2r = 0.13).

Two-point and multipoint linkage analyses

Two-point variance components linkage analyses (performed using IBD probabilities for each of 66 map markers on the eight autosomes) revealed evidence for linkage with three of the traits on M. domestica chromosomes 1 and 8 (Mdo 1 and Mdo 8) (see supplementary Fig. II). On Mdo 8, three markers returned significant LOD scores for V+LDL on the HCHF diet; the highest two-point LOD score was 8.07 at marker 8M253. On Mdo 1, we obtained significant evidence for linkage with V+LDL cholesterol levels on the basal diet, with 1M372 (LOD = 3.81) located near the end of chromosome 1. Although we observed no significant LOD scores for HDL on the basal diet, locus 1M422 had LOD = 1.77 and the adjacent marker (1M448) had LOD = 1.52. There were no LOD scores greater than 0.72 for HDL cholesterol levels on the HCHF diet.

On the basis of the two-point results, we genotyped additional markers on Mdo 1q and 8q and performed multipoint linkage analyses. On Mdo 1, the maximum multipoint LOD score for V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet was 3.11 at the end of the chromosome near marker 1M372 (Fig. 2A); this QTL accounted for ∼70% of the additive genetic variation in V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet. For HDL cholesterol on the basal diet, the maximum multipoint LOD score was 2.41 at 142 cM between markers 1M422 and 1M448 (see supplementary Fig. III). On Mdo 8, we obtained very strong evidence for a QTL that accounted for ∼65% of the additive genetic variation in V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet. This QTL was located between 8M253 and 8M705, maximum LOD score = 9.88 at position 85 cM (Fig. 2B). The 2-LOD support interval comprises the QTL region of interest on each chromosome (28). Our region of interest for V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet on Mdo 1 ranged from 1M637 to 1M372 (the q-end of the chromosome); whereas for V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet on Mdo 8, the QTL region of interest was from 8M031 to 8M431 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Multipoint logarithm of the odds (LOD) score plots for (A) V+LDL cholesterol levels on the basal diet on Mdo 1 and (B) for V+LDL cholesterol levels on the HCHF diet on Mdo 8 using four models: all data; subset, n = 289; INSIG1 microsatellite included; and ABCB4 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) included. Solid vertical lines mark the 2-LOD region of interest.

Identification of candidate genes

To identify potential candidate genes that might influence V+LDL cholesterol on the basal and HCHF diets, we interrogated the opossum genome database and also identified homologous chromosomal regions in humans (Homo sapiens, Hsa) that corresponded to our QTL regions of interest on opossum (Mdo) chromosomes 1 and 8. The QTL region of interest on Mdo 1 exhibited conserved synteny with regions of Hsa 2 and 19 that contained a combined total of 17 known genes, whereas the Mdo 8 region of interest was homologous to regions of Hsa 3, 7, and 10 and contained 215 known genes (see supplementary Table VII). Of the 17 known genes in the QTL region of interest on Mdo 1, only two genes, Alstrom syndrome 1 (ALMS1) and lipin 1 (LPIN1), were also on the list of genes that had been tested for association with lipoprotein-related traits in humans. We did not choose to follow up the Mdo 1 QTL in this report (see DISCUSSION).

For the QTL region of interest on Mdo 8, we identified eight genes (or their paralogs) that were also on the unbiased list of potential candidates for “LDL cholesterol” or “Lipid Metabolism Disorders” (Table 2). These genes included: nitric oxide synthase 3 (eNOS, NOS3), insulin-induced gene 1 (INSIG1), cubilin (CUBN), integrin α8 (ITGA8), ATP binding cassette, subfamily B, members 1 and 4 (ABCB1 and ABCB4), calpain 7 (CAPN7), and UDP-N- acetylgalactosaminyltransferase-like 2 (GALNTL2). We next surveyed the literature to determine which specific traits or functions had been associated with these genes in humans or mice (Table 2). Based on their involvement in various aspects of LDL metabolism, INSIG1, ABCB4, and ABCB1 were deemed high-priority candidate genes for the QTL on Mdo 8 that influences V+LDL cholesterol response to diet.

TABLE 2.

Location of candidate genes and selected microsatellite markers in the QTL region of interest on Mdo 8 (Hsa 3, 7, and 10) for V+LDL cholesterol

Gene or Anonymous Map Marker Name LOD(Max) Linkage Map Position Opossum Genome Assembly Starting Coordinate Opossum Genome Assembly Ending Coordinate Traits Associated in Humans or Mice Reference Gene Name
cM
8M031 3.74 57.1 136,982,377 136,982,733
NOS3 215,557,058 215,581,589 HDL cholesterol hypertension 29 Nitric oxide synthase 3
30
INSIG1 221,251,836 221,258,636 Coronary heart disease 31 Insulin-induced gene 1
Cholesterol homeostasis 32, 33
8M399 7.76 73.8 234,118,780 234,119,632
8M253 9.17 77.4 249,523,679 249,523,932
CUBN 256,860,498 257,159,613 HDL, apoA-I 34 Cubilin (intrinsic factor-cobalamin receptor)
ITGA8 258,509,682 258,737,469 Myocardial infarction 35 Integrin, α8 (ITGA2B paralog)
ABCB4 259,416,385 259,502,884 Phospholipid transport cholestasis 36 ATP binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member 4
37
Plasma cholesterol (LDL) 38
ABCB1 259,539,949 259,635,355 LDL cholesterol response to drugs 39 ATP binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member 1
CAPN7 275,275,816 275,317,137 Intima media thickness 40 Calpain 7 (Calpain 10 paralog)
Type 2 diabetes 41
GALNTL2 276,262,481 276,287,420 Hypertriglyceridemia 42 UDP_ N-acetylgalactosaminyl transferase -like 2 (GALNT2 paralog)
Plasma HDL cholesterol 4,5
8M705 8.54 90.3 279,550,062 279,550,533
8M431 2.87 106.3 302,549,232 302,550,062

apoA-I, apolipoprotein A-I; LOD, logarithm of the odds; QTL, quantitative trait locus.

Expression studies of candidate genes for the QTL on Mdo 8

Using RT-PCR analysis, we compared expression of INSIG1, ABCB1, and ABCB4 in liver samples from both high- and low-V+LDL-responder opossums on both the basal and HCHF diets. Specifically, samples from 6 high- and 6 low-responder animals on the HCHF diet as well as 6 high- and 6 low-responder animals on the basal diet were examined. There was no significant difference between high- and low-V+LDL responders in mean expression for any of the three candidate genes on either diet, although expression of ABCB1 showed a borderline significant difference on the HCHF diet (P = 0.052, Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Mean (±SE) of hepatic RT-PCR expression (measured as ΔCT) on basal and HCHF diets for three candidate genes in high- versus low-V+LDL responders (six animals per group)

Diet High- or Low-V+LDL Group INSIG1 ABCB1 ABCB4
Basal Low 10.14 ± 0.28 24.28 ± 1.36 8.88 ± 0.28
High 10.00 ± 0.30 24.03 ± 1.41 8.30 ± 0.35
P 0.713 0.809 0.190
HCHF Low 9.55 ± 0.33 22.98 ± 1.27 8.20 ± 0.16
High 8.85 ± 0.18 20.03 ± 0.48 8.13 ± 0.15
P 0.075 0.052 0.741

Sequence analysis of INSIG1, ABCB1, and ABCB4

We next looked for exon variants in the candidate genes. Two SNPs were identified in the INSIG1 sequence (see supplementary Table VIII), including a nonsynonymous C/G SNP for amino acid 24 in the mRNA sequence predicted to result in an Arg → Gly substitution. Of nine SNPs identified in the ABCB4 sequence (see supplementary Table VIII), two were predicted to be nonsynonymous; an A/G SNP predicting an Arg → Gly substitution at amino acid 29, and an A/T SNP predicting an Ile → Leu substitution at amino acid 235. SNP detection proved impractical for ABCB1 due to the apparent coamplification of its sequence with that of an annotated pseudogene, resulting in a very high false SNP rate. Overall protein sequence similarities (human to mouse vs. human to opossum) based on BLAST alignment algorithms were 82% versus 85% for INSIG1 and 95% versus 94% for ABCB4. Complete consensus sequences for INSIG1 and ABCB4 and the locations of the nonsynonymous SNPs are shown in supplementary Fig. IV. All three of the nonsynonymous SNPs in ABCB4 or INSIG1 were in amino acids that are located in the transmembrane domain and conserved in human, mouse, and opossum (see supplementary Table IX). However, only Ile235 in ABCB4 was conserved across all tabulated vertebrate species (from human to chicken). Among the 10 sequenced opossums, the genotypes for the nonsynonymous SNPs in ABCB4 are not strongly correlated with high- versus low-responder group, although the genotypes are correlated with each other (Table 4). Because ABCB1 and ABCB4 are virtually contiguous in the genome (Table 2), the ABCB4 SNP marks the region containing both genes. Similarly, the Arg24Gly SNP in INSIG1 is not strongly correlated with responder group, but is correlated with the microsatellite, 8M706, which was used to mark the INSIG1 region (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Genotypes of five high- and five low-V+LDL responders for three nonsynonymous SNPs and a microsatellite for INSIG1 and ABCB4

INSIG1
ABCB4
Animal ID High or Low V+LDL Group Arg24GlyC/G 8M706 170/172 Ile235LeuA/T Arg29GlyA/G
E4855 High CC 172/172 TT GG
E0946 High CC 172/172 TT GG
E3023 High GG 170/170 AT AG
E3030 High CG 170/172 AT AG
E3203 High GG 170/170 AT AG
E3026 Low CG 170/172 AT AG
E3020 Low CG 170/172 AT AG
E3198 Low CC 172/172 TT GG
E3205 Low GG 170/170 AA AA
E3202 Low CG 170/172 AT AG

SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Association and linkage analyses of variants for INSIG1 and ABCB4 regions

All animals with DNA were genotyped for the INSIG1 marker (8M706) and the ABCB4 Ile235Leu SNP. As expected from their genome location (Table 2), the ABCB4 SNP and INSIG1 marker showed ∼12% recombination (LOD score for linkage = 33.1). We next assessed whether variation at either or both of these polymorphisms was significantly associated with V+LDL cholesterol levels on the HCHF diet and whether inclusion of these SNP genotypes as covariates in the linkage analysis models would reduce the QTL signal on Mdo 8. For appropriate comparison of results, all association and linkage analyses described below were performed using data on the subset of 289 opossums that had valid V+LDL cholesterol measures on the HCHF diet and valid genotypes at both the ABCB4 and INSIG1 markers. Using pedigree-based association methods, the model containing neither SNP was highly significantly different from the model containing both variants (P = 9 × 10−14, Table 5), indicating that ABCB4 or INSIG1 or both variants were significantly associated with V+LDL cholesterol levels. The model containing ABCB4 alone was not significantly different (P = 0.70) from the full model; thus, ABCB4 alone described the variation in V+LDL cholesterol as well as a model with both variants, but with fewer parameters. In contrast, the model containing INSIG1 alone was significantly different from the full model (P = 7 × 10−9), indicating that if ABCB4 is in the model, INSIG1 does not provide any additional information. These results indicate that the model containing ABCB4 genotypes alone best described the variation in V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet and that this model is significantly better than a model with no SNPs (P = 9 × 10−14). Although the ABCB4 SNP is significantly associated with V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet and accounts for 18% of the total variation in V+LDL cholesterol, the SNP genotype means do not correspond well with the bimodality seen in Fig. 1. Median V+LDL cholesterols for the AA, AT, and TT genotypes were −0.17, 1.58, and 2.87 (ln mmol/l), respectively, and there was considerable variation in V+LDL cholesterol within each genotype (Fig. 3), indicating that this variant is not likely to be the sole causal SNP for V+LDL cholesterol variation on the HCHF diet, although it may be in linkage disequilibrium with a causal variant or variants.

TABLE 5.

Comparison of models for association of INSIG1 and ABCB4 variants (assuming additive allele effect) with V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet

Model Chi square df P
ABCB4 + INSIG1
ABCB4 0.02 1 0.89
INSIG1 33.58 1 7 × 10−9
No variants 55.54 2 9 × 10−14

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Box-and-whiskers plots of V+LDL cholesterol (ln mmol/l) showing the significant association (P = 9 × 10−14) with ABCB4 SNP genotypes. The solid line represents the median, the boxes encompass the interquartile range (IQR) (the middle 50% of data), and the whiskers mark the1.5 × IQR limits of the upper and lower quartiles. Individual circles are points that fall outside the 1.5 × IQR boundaries.

We performed two-point QTL analyses between V+LDL cholesterol and these variants; the two-point LOD scores were 7.94 and 1.56 for ABCB4 and INSIG1, respectively. We also reran the multipoint linkage analyses to include ABCB4 and INSIG1 marker genotypes as covariates in the linkage analysis model to determine whether significant evidence for linkage remained after including the effects of each polymorphism. Using data on the same subset of 289 animals described above, the maximum LOD score was 8.68 at position 85 cM (Fig. 2B). Inclusion of the ABCB4 SNP in the multipoint linkage model obliterated the QTL signal on Mdo 8; i.e., the maximum LOD score at 85 cM dropped from 8.68 to 0.14. In contrast, inclusion of INSIG1 in the linkage model did not completely remove evidence for linkage; at position 85, the maximum LOD score was 4.5 (P = 10−5), which remains highly significant evidence for a QTL at this position (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, although the Mdo 8 QTL signal was almost abolished, the ABCB4 SNP only accounted for approximately 1/2 of the additive genetic variation due to the QTL. These association and linkage results indicate that the region marked by the ABCB4 SNP, but not by the INSIG1 variant, accounts for much but not all of the variation in V+LDL cholesterol due to the Mdo 8 QTL. Thus, additional variants in the ABCB4 region remain to be detected.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we performed unbiased, “hypothesis-free” genome-wide linkage analyses of plasma cholesterol levels in opossums fed two different diets. We obtained strong evidence (maximum multipoint LOD = 3.1, genomic P = 0.019, Fig. 2A) that a QTL on Mdo 1 influenced V+LDL cholesterol levels on the basal diet and that a QTL on Mdo 8 influenced V+LDL cholesterol levels on the HCHF diet (maximum multipoint LOD = 9.9, genomic P = 5 × 10−9, Fig. 2B). These two QTLs accounted for ∼70% and ∼65% of the residual additive genetic variance of V+LDL cholesterol levels on the basal and HCHF diets, respectively, in these pedigrees. The linkage results are completely consistent with our previous analyses, in which we reported that a major gene accounted for ∼50% of the genetic variation in V+LDL cholesterol on a basal diet, and a separate major gene accounted for ∼80% of the genetic variation in V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet (13). Because we do not have DNA samples from the animals used in our previous studies, we could not perform a combined segregation and linkage analysis to more conclusively demonstrate that the previously detected major genes are, in fact, the Mdo 1 and Mdo 8 QTLs. However, our current results using data from the first- and second-generation offspring of animals analyzed in the previous study strongly support this conjecture.

Locating QTLs for specific traits, either by linkage or association analyses, is the first step toward the goal of identifying candidate genes and, ultimately, causative variants. A potential limitation of the opossum model is that the genome sequence is not as well annotated, nor is the panel of genetic variants as extensive as those of human and some other model species. However, we used a novel approach that incorporated information from a variety of public genomic databases to identify the corresponding conserved syntenic regions in humans and then used the human genome annotation to create a list of known genes in the region. Of the annotated genes that were also orthologs or paralogs of genes on our list of 224 candidate genes (based on two public databases of association studies in humans), we derived a subset of candidate genes (Table 2) residing within the QTL intervals. We then did translated protein BLAST (tBLASTn) analyses of these genes to confirm that the orthologs or paralogs of these genes are indeed present in the opossum chromosomal regions of interest. The power in this multistage analytical approach is that it is unbiased and solely informed by publically available information. After identifying a set of positional candidates, we surveyed the literature to select high-priority candidate genes for follow-up studies.

We identified two potential candidate genes, ALMS1 and LPIN1, located in the QTL region of interest on Mdo 1; however, they are relatively distant from the QTL (see supplementary Table VII), and a survey of the literature is not strongly supportive of either as candidates for this QTL. Although one of the characteristics of individuals with Alstrom syndrome (caused by mutations in ALMS1) is dyslipidemia, and mice without functional LPIN1 exhibit hypertriglyceridemia and fatty livers, studies of variants in these two genes in other human populations revealed no strong association with plasma lipid levels (43, 44). These observations suggest that another, potentially novel, gene may influence V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet. In fact, for future studies, we could expand our list of candidate genes to include all proteins, enzymes, and receptors that are known to be involved in lipoprotein metabolism using, for example, the STRING database of proteins and their interactions (http://string.embl.de/) and/or the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis program (http://www.ingenuity.com/).

In contrast to the QTL on Mdo 1, we identified three high-priority candidate genes (INSIG1, ABCB1, and ABCB4) for the QTL on Mdo 8 that influences V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet. INSIG1 codes for a protein involved in the regulation of the synthesis of cholesterol, fatty acids, triglycerides, and phospholipids (32, 33). ABCB1 and ABCB4 are large, membrane-spanning P-glycoprotein hepatobiliary drug transporters that transport amphipathic molecules and phospholipids, respectively (45). ABCB1 variants have been associated with the LDL cholesterol response to drugs (39); whereas humans and mice with mutations or disruptions in ABCB4 exhibit an impaired ability to secrete phospholipid into bile and develop liver disease (36, 37). We further investigated these candidate genes using expression studies, sequencing, and association analyses.

First, we assessed whether mean differences in V+LDL cholesterol levels between high versus low responders could be due to differences in mRNA expression of the candidate genes. Although our expression study was limited because we only used liver samples, a strong result could have been informative. There were no significant differences in hepatic mRNA expression of the candidate genes between low- versus high-V+LDL cholesterol responders on the basal diet, or for mean expression of INSIG1 or ABCB4 on the HCHF diet, but the difference in ABCB1 expression was borderline (nominal P = 0.052). Mean ABCB1 expression in the high- versus low-V+LDL cholesterol response groups decreased by ∼3 ΔCT units (or ∼8-fold), whereas mean V+LDL cholesterol serum levels increased by ∼25-fold. Furthermore, expression of all three genes appears to decline on the HCHF diet. This same pattern of expression in response to the HCHF diet, that is, reduced expression in both responder groups, but lowest in the high-V+LDL responder group, was also observed for genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis, e.g., HMG-CoA reductase, among opossums fed a high-cholesterol diet (11). Thus, these differences in expression may result as a general response to maintain cholesterol homeostasis. However, this interpretation is limited by our sample size.

To detect SNPs that might affect structural characteristics of the INSIG1, ABCB1, and ABCB4 proteins, and, consequently, differential V+LDL cholesterol response to the HCHF diet, we sequenced all exons of the corresponding mRNAs (isolated from liver) corresponding to our candidate genes from five high- and five low-V+LDL responders. We detected one and two nonsynonymous SNPs in INSIG1 and ABCB4, respectively, but the genotypes at these SNPs were not highly correlated with the high- versus low-V+LDL cholesterol response groups (Table 4). Thus, these structural variants do not, by themselves, account for the differences in V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet. Unfortunately, due to presumed coamplification of sequence from an ABCB1 pseudogene, we were unable to identify SNPs in this candidate gene.

On the basis of the above expression and sequencing results, we were unable to identify variants in any of our candidate genes that would differentiate between high- and low-V+LDL cholesterol response groups. We next performed association and linkage analyses of polymorphisms in (or near) these candidate genes in an effort to narrow the candidate gene region. Results of association analyses revealed that the ABCB4 SNP, but not the INSIG1 marker, was significantly associated with V+LDL cholesterol levels on the HCHF diet (P = 9 × 10−14). Furthermore, inclusion of the ABCB4 SNP genotypes in the multipoint linkage model removed the QTL signal, whereas inclusion of the INSIG1 marker genotypes did not (Fig. 2B). However, variation marked by the ABCB4 Ile235Leu SNP genotype is associated with only ∼35% of the additive genetic variation in V+LDL cholesterol (Fig. 3), whereas the Mdo 8 QTL accounted for ∼65% of the additive genetic variance. Thus, substantial genetic variation at this or other nearby genes remains to be identified, and some of it could well be due to interactions among multiple genetic variants in this region, as well as to epistatic effects of genes on other chromosomes. In support of the latter concept, our previous study (13) indicated that the QTL influencing V+LDL cholesterol on the basal diet also influenced V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet; in the current report, the basal diet QTL is located on Mdo 1.

The linkage and association results strongly indicate that the chromosomal region near ABCB4 contains variants that have large effects on V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet. Mutations in the phospholipid transporter gene ABCB4 are associated with low levels of biliary phospholipids and a growing list of liver diseases in humans and mice (36, 46). In mice, ABCG5 and ABCG8 appear to require intact ABCB4 (a.k.a. MDR2) for secretion of cholesterol into bile and, overall, “to influence the absorption, secretion, and plasma levels of neutral sterols” (47). Although many patients with impairment of ABCB4 have cholesterol levels in the normal range (37), a recent study has reported significant associations in humans of plasma cholesterol levels with two tagging SNPs in ABCB4 (38). These observations are consistent with our hypothesis that genetic variation at or near the ABCB4 locus is at least partly responsible for the observed differences in V+LDL cholesterol on the HCHF diet. This hypothesis is further supported by previous comparisons of opossums with high- versus low-V+LDL cholesterol: high-responder animals had significantly higher hepatic cholesterol, substantially lower biliary phospholipid and cholesterol levels, and larger livers (12, 48), which are similar to phenotypic differences associated with different ABCB4 alleles observed in humans and mice. Although ABCB4 is a plausible candidate gene to influence at least part of the observed V+LDL response to diet, we are approaching the limits of information obtainable from additional statistical genetic analyses of the current population because both our sample size and the opossum meiotic map are relatively small. For example, we are not able to determine whether the ABCB4 SNP could be marking variants in ABCB1 or other nearby genes, including microRNAs. Thus, additional biochemical and molecular genetic studies will be needed to identify the specific variants and mechanisms responsible for the differential V+LDL cholesterol response to an HCHF diet.

In conclusion, we observed dramatic interindividual variation in V+LDL cholesterol response to dietary environment in the opossum, and detected evidence of diet-by-genotype interaction, in that the predominant QTLs for V+LDL cholesterol levels on different diets reside on different chromosomes. We adopted a novel, unbiased, “hypothesis-free” approach, combining linkage analyses, comparative synteny/homology methods, and published information on genes associated with lipoprotein physiology in human and mouse models to identify high-priority candidate genes for the V+LDL cholesterol response (INSIG1, ABCB1, and ABCB4). We then performed gene expression and sequencing analyses, followed by association and linkage analyses, in an effort to include or exclude these candidate gene regions. Our results indicate that the chromosomal region encompassing ABCB1/ABCB4 is likely to harbor variants that affect V+LDL cholesterol response to an HCHF diet. These findings illustrate how combining disparate methodologies can be used to identify candidate genes for quantitative traits, such as V+LDL cholesterol response to diet, in nontraditional animal models such as the opossum.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Susan Mahaney and Kevin Dehoff for assistance with DNA extraction procedures, Jane F. VandeBerg for conducting the lipid assays, and Don Taylor and his staff for managing the animals.

Footnotes

Abbreviations:

apoB
apolipoprotein B
HCHF
high-cholesterol, high-fat
IBD
identity by descent
LOD
logarithm of the odds
QTL
quantitative trait locus
RFLP
restriction fragment-length polymorphism
RG-PCR
restriction site-generating PCR
SNP
single-nucleotide polymorphism

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RR-09919, RR-014214, and DK-065058 and a grant from the Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or other granting agencies. N.G. was partially supported by the project INNOVA-CORFO “Center of Biotechnology for the Development of Arid Zones - Biotecza” #06FC01IBC-71 from the Chilean Agency for Economic Development.

[S]

The online version of this article (available at http://www.jlr.org) contains supplementary data in the form of four figures and nine tables.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Krauss R. M. 2001. Dietary and genetic effects on low-density lipoprotein heterogeneity. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 21: 283–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mahley R. W., Huang Y. D. 1999. Apolipoprotein E: from atherosclerosis to Alzheimer's disease and beyond. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 10: 207–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cohen J., Pertsemlidis A., Kotowski I. K., Graham R., Garcia C. K., Hobbs H. H. 2005. Low LDL cholesterol in individuals of African descent resulting from frequent nonsense mutations in PCSK9. Nat. Genet. 37: 161–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kathiresan S., Willer C. J., Peloso G. M., Demissie S., Musunuru K., Schadt E. E., Kaplan L., Bennett D., Li Y., Tanaka T., et al. 2009. Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia. Nat. Genet. 41: 56–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Willer C. J., Sanna S., Jackson A. U., Scuteri A., Bonnycastle L. L., Clarke R., Heath S. C., Timpson N. J., Najjar S. S., Stringham H. M., et al. 2008. Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease. Nat. Genet. 40: 161–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Manolio T. A., Collins F. S., Cox N. J., Goldstein D. B., Hindorff L. A., Hunter D. J., McCarthy M. I., Ramos E. M., Cardon L. R., Chakravarti A., et al. 2009. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 461: 747–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ordovas J. M. 2006. Nutrigenetics, plasma lipids, and cardiovascular risk. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 106: 1074–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Masson L. F., McNeill G., Avenell A. 2003. Genetic variation and the lipid response to dietary intervention: a systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77: 1098–1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Samollow P. B. 2006. Status and applications of genomic resources for the gray, short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica, an American marsupial model for comparative biology. Aust. J. Zool. 54: 173–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rainwater D. L., VandeBerg J. L. 1992. Dramatic differences in lipoprotein composition among gray short-tailed opossums (Monodelphis domestica) fed a high cholesterol/saturated fat diet. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1126: 159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chan J., Donalson L. M., Kushwaha R. S., Ferdinandusse S., VandeBerg J. F., VandeBerg J. L. 2008. Differential expression of hepatic genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis in high- and low-responding strains of laboratory opossums. Metabolism. 57: 718–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chan J., Kushwaha R. S., VandeBerg J. F., VandeBerg J. L. 2008. Effect of ezetimibe on plasma cholesterol levels, cholesterol absorption and secretion of biliary cholesterol in laboratory opossums with high and low responses to dietary cholesterol. Metabolism. 57: 1645–1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rainwater D. L., Kammerer C. M., Singh A. T. K., Moore P. H., Jr., Poushesh M., Shelledy W. R., VandeBerg J. F., Robinson E. S., VandeBerg J. L. 2001. Genetic control of lipoprotein phenotypes in the laboratory opossum, Monodelphis domestica. GeneScreen. 1: 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kushwaha R. S., VandeBerg J. F., VandeBerg J. L. 2004. Effect of dietary cholesterol with or without saturated fat on plasma lipoprotein cholesterol lvels in the laboratory opossum (Monodelphis domestica) model for diet-induced hyperlipidemia). Br. J. Nutr. 92: 63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mikkelsen T. S., Wakefield M. J., Aken B., Amemiya C. T., Chang J. L., Duke S., Garber M., Gentles A. J., Goodstadt L., Heger A., et al. 2007. Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences. Nature. 447: 167–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Samollow P. B., Gouin N., Miethke P., Mahaney S. M., Kenney M., VandeBerg J. L., Graves J. A., Kammerer C. M. 2007. A microsatellite-based, physically anchored linkage map for the gray, short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Chromosome Res. 15: 269–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.VandeBerg J. L., Williams-Blangero S. 2010. The laboratory opossum. The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals. 8th edition Hubrecht R., Kirkwood J., Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex: 246–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lipid Research Clinics Program Manual of Laboratory Operations. 1974. DHEW (NIH) Publication No. 75-628. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gouin N., Westenberger S. J., Mahaney S. M., Samollow P. B. 2005. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers in the gray, short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Mol. Ecol. Notes. 5: 87–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gouin N., Westenberger S. J., Mahaney S. M., Lindley P., VandeBerg J. L., Samollow P. B. 2005. Development, inheritance, and linkage-group assignment of 60 novel microsatellite markers for the gray, short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica. Genome. 48: 1019–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Samollow P. B., Kammerer C. M., Mahaney S. M., Schneider J. L., Westenberger S. J., VandeBerg S. J. L., Robinson E. S. 2004. First-generation linkage map of the gray, short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica, reveals genome-wide reduction in female recombination rates. Genetics. 166: 307–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Allison D. B., Neale M. C., Zannolli R., Schork N. J., Amos C. I., Blangero J. 1999. Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65: 531–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Almasy L., Blangero J. 1998. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62: 1198–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heath S. C., Snow G. L., Thompson E. A., Tseng C., Wijsman E. M. 1997. MCMC segregation and linkage analysis. Genet. Epidemiol. 14: 1011–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Samollow P. B. 2008. The opossum genome: insights and opportunities from an alternative mammal. Genome Res. 18: 1199–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schmittgen T. D., Livak K. J. 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 3: 1101–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gasparini P., Bonizzato A., Dognini M., Pignatti P. F. 1992. Restriction site generating-polymerase chain reaction (RG-PCR) for the probeless detection of hidden genetic variation: application to the study of some common cystic fibrosis mutations. Mol. Cell. Probes. 6: 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Conneally P. M., Edwards J. H., Kidd K. K., Lalouel J. M., Morton N. E., Ott J., White R. 1985. Report of the Committee on Methods of Linkage Analysis and Reporting. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 40: 356–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.González-Sánchez J. L., Martínez-Larrad M. T., Sáez M. E., Zabena C., Martínez-Calatrava M. J., Serrano-Ríos M. 2007. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase haplotypes are associated with features of metabolic syndrome. Clin. Chem. 53: 91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pereira T. V., Rudnicki M., Cheung B. M., Baum L., Yamada Y., Oliveira P. S., Pereira A. C., Krieger J. E. 2007. Three endothelial nitric oxide (NOS3) gene polymorphisms in hypertensive and normotensive individuals: meta-analysis of 53 studies reveals evidence of publication bias. J. Hypertens. 25: 1763–1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu X., Li Y., Wang L., Zhao Q., Lu X., Huang J., Fan Z., Gu D. 2008. The INSIG1 gene, not the INSIG2 gene, is associated with coronary heart disease: tagSNPs and haplotype-based association study. The Beijing Atherosclerosis Study. Thromb. Haemost. 100: 886–892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang T., Espenshade P. J., Wright M. E., Yabe D., Gong Y., Aebersold R., Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S. 2002. Crucial step in cholesterol homeostasis: sterols promote binding of SCAP to INSIG-1, a membrane protein that facilitates retention of SREBPs in ER. Cell. 110: 489–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Engelking L. J., Liang G., Hammer R. E., Takaishi K., Kuriyama H., Evers B. M., Li W-P., Horton J. D., Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S. 2005. Schoenheimer effect explained–feedback regulation of cholesterol synthesis in mice mediated by Insig proteins. J. Clin. Invest. 115: 2489–2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moestrup S. K., Nielsen L. B. 2005. The role of the kidney in lipid metabolism. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 16: 301–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reiner A.P., Schwartz S. M., Kumar P. N., Rosendaal F. R., Pearce R. M., Aramaki K. M., Psaty B. M., Siscovick D. S. 2001. Platelet glycoprotein IIb polymorphism, traditional risk factors and non-fatal myocardial infarction in young women. Br. J. Haematol. 112: 632–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smit J. J. M., Schinkel A. H., Oude Elferink R. P. J., Groen A. K., Wagenaar E., van Deemter L., Mol C. A. A. M., Ottenhoff R., van der Lugt N. M. T., van Roon M. A., et al. 1993. Homozygous disruption of the murine mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene leads to a complete absence of phospholipid from bile and to liver disease. Cell. 75: 451–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jacquemin E., De Vree J. M., Cresteil D., Sokal E. M., Sturm E., Dumont M., Scheffer G. L., Paul M., Burdelski M., Bosma P. J., et al. 2001. The wide spectrum of multidrug resistance 3 deficiency: from neonatal cholestasis to cirrhosis of adulthood. Gastroenterology. 120: 1448–1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Acalovschi M., Tirzuiu S., Chioran E., Krawczyk M., Grunhage F., Lammert F. 2009. Common variants of ABCB4 and ABCB11 and plasma lipid levels: a study in sib pairs with gallstones and controls. Lipids. 44: 521–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bercovich D., Friedlander Y., Korem S., Houminer A., Hoffman A., Kleinberg L., Shochat C., Leitersdorf E., Meiner V. 2006. The association of common SNPs and haplotypes in the CETP and MDR1 genes with lipids response to fluvastatin in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 185: 97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Goodarzi M. O., Taylor K. D., Jones M. R., Fang B., Guo X., Xiang A. H., Buchanan T. A., Hodis H. N., Raffel L. J., Rotter J. I. 2009. Replication of calpain-10 genetic association with carotid intima-media thickness. Atherosclerosis. 205: 503–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Horikawa Y., Oda N., Cox N. J., Li X., Orho-Melander M., Hara M., Hinokio Y., Lindner T. H., Mashima H., Schwarz P. E., et al. 2000. Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Genet. 26: 163–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hegele R. A., Ban M. R., Hsueh N., Kennedy B. A., Cao H., Zou G. Y., Anand S., Yusuf W., Huff M. W., Wang J. 2009. A polygenic basis for four classical Fredrickson hyperlipoproteinemia phenotypes that are characterized by hypertriglyceridemia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18: 4189–4194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Patel S., Minton J. A., Weedon M. N., Frayling T. M., Ricketts C., Hitman G. A., McCarthy M. I., Hattersley A. T., Walker M., Barrett T. G. 2006. Common variations in the ALMS1 gene do not contribute to susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in a large white UK population. Diabetologia. 49: 1209–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fawcett K. A., Grimsey N., Loos R. J., Wheeler E., Daly A., Soos M., Semple R., Syddall H., Cooper C., Siniossoglou S., et al. 2008. Evaluating the role of LPIN1 variation on insulin resistance, body weight and human lipodystrophy in UK populations. Diabetes. 57: 2527–2533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Elferink R. O., Groen A. K. 2002. Genetic defects in hepatobiliary transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1586: 129–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Davit-Spraul A., Gonzales E., Baussan C., Jacquemin E. 2010. The spectrum of liver diseases related to ABCB4 gene mutations: pathophysiology and clinical aspects. Semin. Liver Dis. 30: 134–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Langheim S., Liquing Y., von Bergmann K., Lutjohann D., Xu F., Hobbs H. H., Cohen J. C. 2005. ABCG5 and ABCG8 require MDR2 for secretion of cholesterol into bile. J. Lipid Res. 46: 1732–1738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chan J., Mahaney M. C., Kushwaha R. S., VandeBerg J. F., VandeBerg J. L. ABCB4 mediates diet-induced hypercholesterolemia in laboratory opossums. J. Lipid Res. 51: 2922–2928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Journal of Lipid Research are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES