Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2010 Sep 17;12(18):3986–3989. doi: 10.1021/ol1015306

Highly α-Selective Hydrolysis of α,β-Epoxyalcohols using Tetrabutylammonium Fluoride

Purba Mukerjee †,, Mohammed Abid , Frank C Schroeder †,*
PMCID: PMC2937070  NIHMSID: NIHMS230643  PMID: 20722386

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms230643f6.jpg

We report a simple method for the highly regio- and stereoselective hydrolysis of α,β-epoxyalcohols. Treatment of enantiopure epoxyalcohols derived from Sharpless epoxidation with TBAF/H2O resulted in exclusive ring opening at the normally disfavored α-position, providing access to arabino- or lyxo-configured triols with full preservation of stereochemical purity. The method was applied in syntheses of 5-deoxy-L-arabinose (26) and a family of bicyclic acetals based on the insect pheromone hydroxybrevicomin (4).


Arrays of three or more consecutive hydroxylated chiral centers are a common structural feature of natural products from diverse sources, including polyketides (e.g. aspicilin (1),1 erythromycin A (2),2 or FK506 (3)3), products of fatty-acid metabolism (e.g. hydroxybrevicomin (4)4), and carbohydrate derivatives. A variety of approaches are available for the synthesis of these polyol moieties, for example asymmetric dihydroxylation,5 carbohydrate-based methods,6 or the hydrolysis of chiral epoxides.7 However, with the exception of carbohydrate-based approaches, the diastereomeric purity of the resulting triols is often relatively low. Because α,β-epoxyalcohols can be obtained in very high stereoselectivity via Sharpless epoxidation/kinetic resolution,8 their use for the preparation of polyol motifs is particularly attractive, and methods of varying selectivity have been described for epoxide ring-opening at the β-position.7,9 Here we report a simple method for the highly selective hydrolysis of α,β-epoxyalcohols at the usually disfavored α-position, providing direct access to arabino- or lyxo-configured triols of very high diastereomeric purity.

We started investigating methods for the stereoselective preparation of triols as part of our efforts toward synthesis of a library of bicyclic acetals representing cryptic ketodiols and –triols, which play important roles as pheromones in insects and mammals.10

Previous syntheses of the bicyclic acetal hydroxybrevicomin (4) relied on preparation of the corresponding triol via hydrolysis of chiral epoxyalcohols.4b,11 Francke et al. based their approach on Sharpless epoxidation and harnessed its powerful kinetic resolution for generating the required epoxyalcohols in up to 99.5% de.4b However, subsequent hydrolysis of the epoxide led to considerable loss of stereochemical purity. Using a similar approach, we investigated a variety of conditions to improve regioselectivity of the hydrolysis of chiral epoxyalcohols such as 9, which was prepared as described previously (Scheme 1).4b

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of hydroxybrevicomin 4 via stereoselective hydrolysis of epoxyalcohol 9.

Consistent with previous examples,7,9 treatment of epoxyalcohol 9 with acids or bases in a variety of solvents resulted in mixtures of the corresponding (6,7-syn,6,8-anti)- and (6,7-anti,6,8-syn)-triols 10 (Scheme 1). For example, treatment of 9 with KOH in water, HF in CH3CN, or HCl, H2SO4, or TsOH in water resulted in formation of (6R,7R,8R)-10 and (6R,7S,8S)-10 in ratios of about 70:30 to 90:10. Upon isolation, these mixtures of ketotriols rapidly cyclized to yield mixtures of two stereoisomers of the bicyclic acetal 4 (Scheme 1). Relative configurations were determined using NOESY spectra.

Serendipitously, it was noted that deprotection of the TBDMS-ether in 8 using TBAF in acetonitrile occasionally produced small amounts of an unexpectedly non-polar by-product. Upon isolation, this by-product was identified as (1R,1’R,5’R,7’R)-4 of very high diastereomeric purity. This observation suggested that the desilylation conditions induced slow but highly regioselective α-hydrolysis of the desilylated epoxyalcohol 9.

Therefore, we investigated whether TBAF could be used to convert epoxyalcohols into the corresponding triols without loss of diastereomeric purity. Screening of a variety of solvent, temperature, and reagent combinations revealed that treatment of the epoxyalcohols 8 or 9 with 3 equivalents of TBAF in the presence of small amounts of acetonitrile and water at 35–40 °C produced optimal results. Under these conditions, reaction of silylated epoxyalcohol 8 or unsilylated 9 directly yielded bicyclic acetal (1R,1’R,5’R,7’R)-4 (derived from cyclization of initially formed ketotriol (6R,7R,8R)-10) without any detectable loss of diastereomeric purity (Figure 2). The in-situ formation of bicyclic acetals 4 from the initially produced ketotriols 10 enabled fast and unambiguous assessment of the regioselectivity of the epoxide hydrolysis process, because the bicyclic acetals’ configuration could be assigned easily via analysis of NOESY NMR spectra.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

NMR-spectroscopic analysis of TBAF-promoted epoxyalcohol hydrolysis (600 MHz, acetone-d6). A: 1H-NMR spectrum of epoxyalcohol (6R,7S,8R)-8 (green signals), containing about 3% of the (6R,7R,8S)-diastereomer (red signals). To illustrate sample purity, 13C-satellites (intensity 0.5% of the parent signals) are marked blue. B: 1H-NMR spectrum of 4:1-mixture of (1R,1’R,5’R,7’R)-4 (green) and its (1S,1’R,5’R,7’S)-diastereomer (red signals), along with smaller amounts of other cyclization products, obtained from (6R,7S,8R)-8 via treatment with H2SO4. C: 1H-NMR spectrum of 97:3-mixture of 6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes obtained from (6R,7S,8R)-8 via treatment with TBAF. D: 1H-NMR spectrum of (6R,7R,8R)-11 (green signals), containing 0.5% or less of the (6R,7S,8S)-diastereomer (red signals). E: 1H-NMR spectrum of (1R,1’R,5’R,7’R)-12 (green signals) derived from treatment of (6R,7R,8R)-11. 13C-satellites (blue arrows, intensity 0.5% of parent signal) are clearly visible, whereas signals of other diastereomers are too small to be discerned.

Using THF, ether, dichloromethane, or chloroform instead of acetonitrile or increasing the amount of water in the reaction mixture starkly increased reaction times and reduced stereoselectivity. Additionally, a high concentration of TBAF (~60% by weight) in the reaction mixture was necessary to maintain high stereoselectivity.

To demonstrate general utility of the method, we applied these conditions to a variety of diastereomerically pure epoxyalcohols. Representative examples are shown in Scheme 2, all of which were prepared via Sharpless kinetic resolution followed by Sharpless epoxidation. In order to investigate whether anchimeric assistance of the carbonyl in 9 played a role for the stereoselectivity of epoxide opening, we also included epoxyalcohols 20, 22, and 24, which lack additional oxygenation. In all cases, TBAF-promoted hydrolysis selectively produced the corresponding arabino- or lyxo-configured triols, of which those featuring 4-oxopentyl or 5-oxohexyl substituents quickly cyclized forming bicyclic acetals. NMR-spectroscopic analysis of the reaction products confirmed full preservation of diastereomeric purity of the employed epoxyalcohols. Isolated yields varied between 65 and 87%, in addition to 0–20% of recovered starting materials.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

TBAF-promoted hydrolysis of a variety of epoxyalcohols and synthesis of 5-deoxy-l-arabinose.

These results show that TBAF-promoted hydrolysis of epoxyalcohols is effective for a wide range of substrates, for example tolerating the presence of unprotected carbonyl groups. The applicability towards double bond- or phenyl-substituted epoxyalcohols such as 13 or 24 allows introduction of additional oxygenation proximal to the triol, providing access to uncommon carbohydrat derivatives. A simple example is 5-deoxy-L-arabinose (26), an intermediate in several published syntheses of biopterin derivatives.12 As shown in Scheme 2, TBAF-promoted hydrolysis of epoxyalcohol 24 allowed preparation of 5-deoxy-l-arabinose of high diastereomeric purity (>99% de for the mixture of anomers) in five straight-forward steps.

In conclusion, our method enables preparation of arabino- or lyxo-configured consecutive triols of very high diastereomeric purity via diastereoselective α-hydrolysis of the appropriate epoxyalcohols. The method’s simplicity and mild conditions suggest broad applicability, and it effectively complements methods that facilitate ring opening in the β-position of epoxyalcohols (Scheme 3).7,9

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Ring opening of α,β-epoxyalcohols using TBAF compared to other methods.7,9

Given that for α,β-epoxyalcohols nucleophilic attack in β-position is generally much preferred,7,9 the selectivity for α-attack in the presence of TBAF is striking. Interestingly, this unusual reactivity seems to be specific to the fluoride salt, as attempts to substitute TBAF with the similarly basic tetrabutylammonium hydroxide were not successful. Treatment of epoxyalcohols with tetrabutylammonium hydroxide in acetonitrile at 40 °C produced only small amounts of triol (<20% conversion after 24 h) which was found to be of low diastereomeric purity. As could be expected, treatment of epoxyalcohols with the much less basic tetrabutylammonium chloride or perchlorate did not effect any epoxide opening. Based on other recent examples for solvent-dependent changes in regioselectivity of epoxide opening,13 it seems possible that specific hydrogen bonding interactions facilitate α-attack in water-limited TBAF/CH3CN/H2O mixtures. We are currently exploring the utility of this method to opening epoxides with nucleophiles other than hydroxyl or water.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Natural products including or derived from D- or L-arabino-configured triols.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (GM079571). We thank Jón T. Njarðarson and Joshua C. Judkins (Cornell) for helpful suggestions.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available. Complete experimental details along with spectroscopic data for all compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Sinha SC, Keinan E. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:377. doi: 10.1021/jo9614811. (and references cited therein) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Banwell MG, McRae KJ. Org. Lett. 2000;2:3583. doi: 10.1021/ol006457v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Dixon DJ, Foster AC, Ley SV. Org. Lett. 2000;2:123. doi: 10.1021/ol991214s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Pal S. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:3171. [Google Scholar]; (b) Evans DA, Kim AS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:53. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Nakatsuka M, Ragan JA, Sammakia T, Smith DB, Uehling DE, Schreiber SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:5583. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ireland RE, Gleason JL, Gegnas LD, Highsmith TK. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:6856. doi: 10.1021/jo951646q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ireland RE, Liu L, Roper TD, Gleason JL. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:13257. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Silverstein RM, Brownlee RG, Bellas TE, Wood DL, Browne LE. Science. 1968;159:889. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3817.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Francke F, Schroeder F, Philipp P, Meyer H, Sinnwell V, Gries G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996;4:363. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(96)00013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Kolb HC, VanNieuwenhze MS, Sharpless KB. Chem. Rev. 1994;94:2483. [Google Scholar]; (b) Guzman-Perez A, Corey EJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:5941. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Oikawa Y, Nishi T, Yonemitsu O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983;24:3635. [Google Scholar]; (b) Oikawa Y, Nishi T, Yonemitsu O. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1985;1:7. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Roush WR, Brown RJ. J. Org. Chem. 1982;47:1371. [Google Scholar]; (b) Roush WR, Brown RJ, DiMare M. J. Org. Chem. 1983;48:5083. [Google Scholar]; (c) Behrens CH, Sharpless KB. J. Org. Chem. 1985;50:5696. [Google Scholar]; Rengasamy R, Curtis-Long MJ, Seo WD, Jeong I-Y, Park KH. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:2898. doi: 10.1021/jo702480y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Katsuki T, Sharpless KB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980;102:5974. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gao Y, Hanson RM, Klunder JM, Ko SY, Masamune H, Sharpless KB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:5765. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Pepito AS, Dittmer DC. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:4311. [Google Scholar]; (b) Honda T, Ohta M, Mizutani H. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 1. 1999;1:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Francke W, Schulz S. Pheromones. In: Baron DHR, Nakanishi K, editors. Comprehensive Natural Product Chemistry. Vol. 8. Elsevier; 1999. pp. 197–261. [Google Scholar]; (b) Rasmussen LEL, Greenwood DR. Chem. Senses. 2003;28:433. doi: 10.1093/chemse/28.5.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Astashko DA, Kulinkovich OG, Tyvorskii VI. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2006;42:719. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fernandez A-M, Duhamel L. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:8698. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jamison TF, Vilotijevic I. Science. 2007;317:1189–1192. doi: 10.1126/science.1146421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES