Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2010 Jul 16;192(18):4562–4570. doi: 10.1128/JB.00536-10

Massive Gene Duplication Event among Clinical Isolates of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis W/Beijing Family

Pilar Domenech 1, Gaëlle S Kolly 1,2, Lizbel Leon-Solis 1, Ashley Fallow 1, Michael B Reed 1,*
PMCID: PMC2937425  PMID: 20639330

Abstract

As part of our effort to uncover the molecular basis for the phenotypic variation among clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, we have previously reported that isolates belonging to the W/Beijing lineage constitutively overexpress the DosR-regulated transcriptional program. While generating dosR knockouts in two independent W/Beijing sublineages, we were surprised to discover that they possess two copies of dosR. This dosR amplification is part of a massive genomic duplication spanning 350 kb and encompassing >300 genes. In total, this equates to 8% of the genome being present as two copies. The presence of IS6110 elements at both ends of the region of duplication, and in the novel junction region, suggests that it arose through unequal homologous recombination of sister chromatids at the IS6110 sequences. Analysis of isolates representing the major M. tuberculosis lineages has revealed that the 350-kb duplication is restricted to the most recently evolved sublineages of the W/Beijing family. Within these isolates, the duplication is partly responsible for the constitutive dosR overexpression phenotype. Although the nature of the selection event giving rise to the duplication remains unresolved, its evolution is almost certainly the result of specific selective pressure(s) encountered inside the host. A preliminary in vitro screen has failed to reveal a role of the duplication in conferring resistance to common antitubercular drugs, a trait frequently associated with W/Beijing isolates. Nevertheless, this first description of a genetic remodeling event of this nature for M. tuberculosis further highlights the potential for the evolution of diversity in this important global pathogen.


Mycobacterium tuberculosis—the bacterium responsible for almost 2 million human deaths each year due to tuberculosis (TB)—exhibits a highly clonal population structure and, unlike many pathogenic bacteria, shows little evidence of having recently acquired exogenous DNA from unrelated organisms via horizontal gene transfer and recombination (30). Thus, it seems that the primary mechanism by which M. tuberculosis is able to modify existing phenotypes is through an alteration in the complement of genetic material that it already has available. To date, most of the phenotypic variation that has been reported for M. tuberculosis involves single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and deletions, although transposition of conserved insertion sequence elements (e.g., IS6110) represents another potential mode for generating variability (1, 14, 16, 22). Recent SNP- and microarray-based whole-genome surveys have demonstrated that M. tuberculosis has evolved via clonal expansion into six major lineages that are referred to colloquially as Indo-Oceanic, East Asian, East African-Indian, Euro-American, West African-1, and West African-2. Aside from the widespread Euro-American lineage, each of these lineages tends to exhibit a strong degree of association with a particular geographic area (19, 29, 38).

Of all the major lineages described to date, it is undoubtedly the East-Asian lineage (commonly referred to as the Beijing or W/Beijing lineage) that has received the most attention in recent years. Originally described as the predominant genotype in China, where it is responsible for approximately 50% of TB cases, the W/Beijing lineage now accounts for at least 13% of all isolates worldwide (26). Alarmingly, the W/Beijing genotype appears to be emerging in several diverse regions, including countries of the former Soviet Union, South Africa, and Western Europe (9, 17, 26). Of further concern are the reports associating this recent epidemic spread with the appearance of drug resistance and treatment failure (12, 25). Together, these findings have led to mounting speculation that W/Beijing strains possess unique phenotypic attributes related to an increased ability to cause disease and to survive drug exposure within certain patient settings (3, 26). Despite the fact that the W/Beijing lineage is often treated as a single homogenous unit, these strains can be further classified into five evolutionary sublineages (groups 1 to 5) on the basis of the RD105, RD207, RD181, RD150, and RD142 deletions (14). Recent indications are that the aforementioned epidemiological traits may be restricted to specific W/Beijing sublineages (18, 20).

We have previously shown that strains of the W/Beijing lineage constitutively overexpress the DosR regulon and are natural mutants in one of the two sensor kinases (DosT) controlling activation of the DosR two-component regulatory system (13, 28). The present study was initiated as part of our ongoing effort to understand the regulatory control of the DosR regulon in this background. While generating a series of DosR disruption mutants, we discovered that members of the most recently evolved subgroups of the W/Beijing family possess two copies of the gene encoding DosR. Much to our astonishment, these two copies of dosR are actually part of a much larger chromosomal duplication event that encompasses more than 300 genes and spans 350 kb (kb). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a duplication (large or small) that has been recorded for M. tuberculosis and serves to highlight the potential for the evolution of diversity in this global pathogen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.

M. tuberculosis strains were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 10% ADC (8.1 g/liter NaCl, 50 g/liter bovine serum albumin [BSA] fraction V [Calbiochem], 20 g/liter glucose), 0.2% glycerol, and 0.05% Tween 80 or on Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Difco) supplemented with 10% OADC (ADC plus 0.6 ml/liter oleic acid, 3.6 mM NaOH). Kanamycin (25 μg/ml), hygromycin (50 μg/ml), or 2% sucrose was added as needed. H37Rv (ATCC 27294) and Mycobacterium bovis (Ravenel) were purchased from the ATCC. The majority of the isolates examined in this study were collected between 2001 and 2007 from mostly foreign-born TB patients residing on the island of Montreal (29). HN878 and NHN5 were originally obtained from J. Musser (Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, TX) (32); strains W4, W10, and W210 were obtained from B. Kreiswirth (Public Health Research Institute Center, New Jersey). CDC1551 was originally obtained from T. Shinnick (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA) (36). Where necessary, our W/Beijing strain collection was supplemented with isolates obtained from San Francisco TB patients, kindly provided by S. Gagneux (National Institute for Medical Research, United Kingdom) and P. Small (Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA) (14). M. bovis (BCG) and Mycobacterium canetti were obtained from the Pasteur Institute (Paris, France).

General nucleic acid techniques.

Mycobacterial DNA was isolated according to the protocol of Pelicic et al. (27), and M. tuberculosis transformations were carried out as previously described (31). The oligonucleotide primers used for PCR and sequencing reactions are presented in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Where necessary, 5 to 10% DMSO was included in the PCRs. Southern hybridizations were carried out using the ECL direct nucleic acid labeling and detection system (GE Healthcare).

Construction of dosR disruption mutants.

A 2.4-kb PCR fragment containing the dosR gene was generated using primers dosR-1 and dosS-1 and cloned into the XbaI site of pcDNA2.1 (Invitrogen). After sequencing, 386 bp of the dosR gene was replaced by inserting either the 1.5-kb hygromycin resistance cassette (hyg) from pHint (24) or the 1.2-kb kanamycin resistance (kan) cassette from pMV261 (33) into the BbsI and BlpI sites of dosR. Finally, the 3.5-kb dosR::hyg-containing fragment (or the 3.2-kb dosR::kan fragment) was excised and cloned into the mycobacterial shuttle vector, pPR23 (27). All selection and screening procedures for the isolation of homologous recombinants in H37Rv, HN878, and G4B1.2 were as previously described (11, 27). The G4B1.2-32 dosR::hyg mutant was used as the parental strain for generation of the double dosR knockouts (dosR1::kan dosR2::hyg) through the same approach, with only kanamycin being used in the initial selection process.

Microarray analysis.

Whole-genome microarray analysis was carried out as described previously (10), with only minor modifications. Two micrograms of purified genomic DNA was labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5-NHS esters (GE Healthcare) via the aminoallyl indirect labeling method (39) using DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment and a mixture of random hexamers (Fermentas). The microarrays used in these experiments were provided by M. Behr (McGill University) and are composed of 70-bp oligonucleotides (TB Array-Ready Oligo Set; Operon) printed in duplicate. For genomic DNA comparisons, at least two independent arrays were analyzed for each pair of samples (Cy3/Cy5 and Cy5/Cy3).

Cloning and sequencing the beginning, end, and junction regions of the duplication.

To obtain the sequences of these three regions, the following fragments were cloned: (i) a 9.6-kb HindIII-SspI fragment from G4B1.2-30 (dosR1::hyg) was used for isolating the sequence at the beginning of the duplication, (ii) a 6.2-kb AgeI fragment from the G4B1.2 wild type was used for obtaining the sequence at the end of the duplication, and (iii) the sequence of the junction region was obtained from a 13-kb NdeI-SspI fragment from the G4B1.2-32 (dosR2::hyg) strain. All DNA fragments were gel purified and ligated with pBluescript II KS+ (Stratagene). Escherichia coli NEB 10-beta (New England BioLabs) transformants were plated on LB agar plus hygromycin (200 μg/ml) or LB agar plus ampicillin (100 μg/ml) in the case of the unmarked fragment isolated from G4B1.2. For the latter, positive colonies were identified by screening for the presence of the alr gene by colony blotting using the ECL labeling and detection system. Sequence analysis was carried out at McGill University and the Genome Québec Innovation Centre.

qRT-PCR.

Techniques used in the preparation of cDNA for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of dosR expression are described elsewhere (13). RNA samples were prepared from at least two independent biological replicates for each strain under investigation. Primers dosR-F and dosR-R were used for quantification of dosR gene expression, while primers specific for the sigA housekeeping gene (sigA1-F and sigA1-R) were used to normalize the amount of cDNA template added to each sample. qRT-PCRs were carried out in quadruplicate using a model 7300 real-time PCR system and Power SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The relative standard curve method was used for quantification as previously described (10, 13).

Microarray data accession number.

Microarray data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE20917.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Sequence data for the beginning, junction, and end regions of the 350-kb duplication have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HM053705 to HM053707.

RESULTS

Generation of dosR::hyg recombinant strains in W/Beijing isolates reveals the presence of two copies of dosR.

In previous studies we have demonstrated that strains of the W/Beijing lineage overexpress the DosR “dormancy” regulon in a constitutive manner (13, 28). To begin to understand the relevance of this phenotype to the pathogenesis of W/Beijing strains, we set out to inactivate dosR in clinical isolates G4B1.2 and HN878 belonging to subgroups 4 and 5 of the W/Beijing lineage, respectively. As a control, dosR was also inactivated in the H37Rv laboratory strain (non-W/Beijing). Southern blot analysis of the dosR::hyg recombinants and wild-type parental strains using a dosR-containing probe revealed the following (Fig. 1 A). (i) For H37Rv, the expected 11.4-kb fragment was detected in the wild type, whereas two fragments of 6.9 and 5.5 kb were observed in the dosR::hyg derivatives (H37Rv-19 and -24) due to introduction of a PstI site present in the hyg cassette (Fig. 1B). (ii) For HN878 and G4B1.2, we observed a single fragment of 11.4 kbp in the wild type and three fragments of 11.4, 6.9, and 5.5 kb in the dosR::hyg clones (HN878-25 and -28 and G4B1.2-30 and -32). The latter result was completely unexpected and suggested the presence of both intact and mutated copies of dosR in these strains. We speculated that either there were two copies of dosR in HN878 and G4B.1.2 or only a single crossover event had occurred. To rule out the second possibility, we hybridized the same membrane with the pPR23 vector backbone, which confirmed that no part of the vector remained integrated (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). We therefore hypothesized that there are two copies of dosR in the HN878 and G4B1.2 backgrounds.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Southern blotting reveals the presence of two copies of dosR in recombinant W/Beijing strains. Genomic DNA from wild-type and two independent dosR::hyg recombinants generated for H37Rv (clones 19 and 24) and the W/Beijing isolates HN878 (clones 25 and 28) and G4B1.2 (clones 30 and 32) was digested with PstI and transferred by Southern blotting. (A) The membrane was hybridized with a 2.4-kb PCR fragment (generated using dosR-1 and dosS-1) that includes Rv3134c, dosR, and 739 bp of dosS. Note the presence of an intact copy of dosR retained by the HN878 and G4B1.2 dosR::hyg strains. (B) Based on the published H37Rv sequence, a genetic map of the dosR region in the recombinant strains is shown. By replacing 486 bp of dosR with the hyg resistance cassette, an additional PstI site has been introduced.

To confirm that this surprising finding was not just an artifact of the recombination process, additional Southern analysis using a second set of enzymes and probes was carried out in an attempt to demonstrate the presence of two copies of dosR in the W/Beijing wild-type isolates (see Fig. S1B to D in the supplemental material). Using the same dosR probe as above, we again obtained the expected results with the H37Rv wild-type (7.3-kb) and dosR::hyg (8.3-kb) strains. However, on this occasion we could clearly observe two fragments of 8.6 and 18 kb for wild-type HN878 and G4B1.2, consistent with there being two copies of dosR (see Fig. S1B). Likewise, two fragments were revealed in the HN878-25 and -28 (8.6- and 9.6-kb), G4B1.2-30 (9.3- and 18-kb), and G4B1.2-32 (8.6- and 19-kb) dosR::hyg recombinants. The 8.3-kb (H37Rv-19 and -24), 9.6-kb (HN878-25 and -28), 9.3-kb (G4B1.2-30), and 19-kb (G4B1.2-32) fragments also cohybridize to a probe specific for the hyg gene, indicating that these copies of dosR have been inactivated through insertion of the hyg resistance cassette (see Fig. S1C). The same blot was reprobed with a dosR-specific probe that corresponds to the portion of dosR replaced by the hyg cassette during the generation of the dosR::hyg strains. For H37Rv, only a single fragment was detected in the wild type, with no signal detected for the dosR mutants. Two dosR-hybridizing fragments were again detected for wild-type HN878 and G4B1.2 (8.6 and 18 kb). For the W/Beijing recombinants, the alternate copy of dosR that was not detected by the hyg probe was recognized in this case (see Fig. S1D). In summary, the results confirm that the W/Beijing isolates HN878 and G4B1.2 are diploid for the dosR gene and that their dosR::hyg derivatives are haploid as they retain one functional copy. Interestingly, the two distinct copies of dosR have been inactivated independently in strains G4B1.2-30 (dosR1::hyg) and G4B1.2-32 (dosR2::hyg), respectively. Finally, it should be noted that there were some anomalies with the HN878 strain. First, the larger of the dosR-containing fragments (18 kb) identified in wild-type HN878 is much fainter than the smaller fragment. Second, a smaller product (9.6 kb) was observed in the dosR haploids in this background (dosR2::hyg; HN878-25 and -28) than for G4B1.2 (see Fig. S1). The explanation for these observations is given below.

The two copies of dosR are part of a much larger chromosomal duplication.

In order to define the extent of the duplication event that gave rise to the two copies of dosR in the W/Beijing background, we carried out a whole-genome microarray analysis comparing the genome content of H37Rv with that of the wild-type G4B1.2 and HN878 isolates. Figure 2 shows the Z scores obtained for all 3924 H37Rv genes represented on the arrays (8) for the hybridizations comparing G4B1.2 with H37Rv (Fig. 2A) and HN878 with H37Rv (Fig. 2B). Z scores of ≥2.0 indicate that a particular gene is more abundant in the “test” strain (G4B1.2 or HN878) than in the reference strain (H37Rv). Conversely, Z scores of ≤2.0 indicate that a gene is more abundant in the reference strain (H37Rv) and are suggestive of a deletion in the test strains. Several deletions were detected; these included those characteristic of group 4 (RD105, RD207, and RD150) and group 5 (RD105, RD207, and RD142) W/Beijing isolates (14, 34) and the RD3 and RD152 deletions that have been described elsewhere (5, 35). The short RD181 deletion common to group 3 to 5 W/Beijing isolates was not detected due to the spacing of the oligonucleotides corresponding to the Rv2262c and Rv2263 genes affected by this deletion.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Characterization of the W/Beijing duplication through whole-genome microarray. Comparative array hybridizations were carried out for genomic DNA prepared from wild-type W/Beijing isolates G4B1.2 (A) and HN878 (B) versus H37Rv. For each, the average Z scores from three arrays for each of the 3,924 genes present in H37Rv are shown. The RD105 and RD207 deletions unique to the W/Beijing lineage are indicated, as are the RD150 and RD142 deletions that are characteristic of group 4 and 5 W/Beijing isolates, respectively. The RD3 and RD152 deletions were also identified. The majority of the ∼300 genes in the contiguous stretch from Rv3128c to Rv3427c showed a Z score of ≥2.0, consistent with the presence of a 350-kb duplicated region in G4B1.2 and HN878 relative to H37Rv.

Strikingly, the microarray comparisons of G4B1.2 with H37Rv revealed a contiguous stretch of approximately 300 genes with a Z score of ≥2.0, suggesting that all these genes have been duplicated within the G4B1.2 isolate (Fig. 2). A very similar although slightly less-well-defined pattern was also seen for HN878 (discussed below). Hence, in these two isolates, there is a massive duplication that spans 350 kb of the chromosome and comprises all genes ranging from the Rv3128c to the Rv3427c genes. This equates to approximately 8% of the total H37Rv genome being present as two copies within these W/Beijing isolates. Table 1 shows the predicted functional categories of the 313 genes present in the 350-kb duplication as defined in the TubercuList (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/TubercuList/). Aside from the dosR/dosS regulatory system, the entire NADH dehydrogenase I (nuoA to -N) and succinate dehydrogenase (sdhA to -D) enzyme complexes are also present as two copies in the W/Beijing strains containing the duplication. Also noteworthy are the large number of genes encoding regulatory proteins (mtrAB, whiB1 to -B3, and whiB7) and extracytoplasmic function sigma factors (σD, σF, σH, σJ). Thus, any impact of the duplication could potentially extend well beyond the borders of this 350-kb region.

TABLE 1.

Functional categories of the 313 genes present in the 350-kb duplication

Functional category No. of genes in duplication % of total genesa
Virulence, detoxification, adaptation 15 0.38
Lipid metabolism 17 0.43
Information pathways 20 0.51
Cell wall and cell wall processes 35 0.89
Insertion sequences and phages 17 0.43
PE/PPE proteins 14 0.36
Intermediary metabolism and respiration 89 2.27
Regulatory proteins 21 0.54
Conserved hypothetical proteins 85 2.17
All genes in the duplication 313 7.98
a

Relative to the complete H37Rv genome.

The twin copies of the duplicated sequence are tandemly arranged.

We speculated that the two copies of the 350-kb region would most likely be arranged in a direct tandem duplication, the proposed structure of which is given in Fig. 3 A. To confirm this particular arrangement, a series of Southern blot analyses were carried out for genomic DNAs prepared from the wild-type H37Rv, HN878, and G4B1.2 strains. When a probe specific for the Rv3127c gene was used, a single hybridization fragment was detected for all three strains, whereas two fragments were seen for HN878 and G4B1.2 when the same blot was rehybridized to a tgs1 probe (Fig. 3B and C). This result confirms that the beginning of the duplication is located between Rv3127c and tgs1. On a separate blot, two fragments were detected for HN878 and G4B1.2 when an alr probe was used, whereas only one was detected when a gadB probe was used (Fig. 3F and G). This confirms that the end of the duplication is located between alr and gadB. Finally, two distinct fragments are seen for HN878 and G4B1.2 when either an alr probe or a dosR probe is used to hybridize a third blot targeting the junction region of the duplication (Fig. 3D and E). Importantly, the 18-kb fragment cohybridizes with both probes, indicating that alr and dosR lie on the same HindIII-SspI fragment in this junction region, thereby confirming that copies 1 and 2 of the 350-kb sequence are arranged as a direct tandem duplication.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

The two copies of the 350-kb duplicated region are arranged in tandem. (A) A schematic representation of the duplicated region is shown. Genes Rv3128c and Rv3427c mark the approximate beginning and end of each duplicated segment, respectively. Genes Rv3127c and gadB flank the duplication externally. The length of the duplication is indicated in parentheses, and the two copies (Copy 1 and Copy 2) are arranged in a direct, tandem duplication. The arrangement of the genes indicated (boxed) was confirmed by Southern blotting of genomic DNA comparing wild-type H37Rv and the W/Beijing isolates HN878 and G4B1.2. The approximate locations of the restriction enzyme sites are based upon the published H37Rv sequence. (B and C) Southern blots confirming that the beginning of the duplication is located between Rv3127c (single copy) and tgs1 (duplicated). DNAs were digested with XbaI and hybridized with a 620-bp probe derived from Rv3127c (B; primers Rv3127c-A and -B) or with a 920-bp tgs1 probe (C; primers Rv3130-1 and Rv3130c-F). (D and E) Southern blots confirming the location of the junction of the duplication and that the two copies are arranged in a direct, tandem duplication. DNAs digested with HindIII and SspI were hybridized with a 540-bp alr probe (D; primers alr-C and alr-R) or with a 1-kb dosR probe [E; primers dosR-C and dosRrev(HindIII)]. (F and G) Southern blots confirming that the end of the duplication is located between Rv3427c (duplicated) and gadB (single copy). DNAs were digested with BamHI and NheI and hybridized with the 540-bp alr probe (F) or a 1.2-kb gadB probe (G; primers gadB-C and gadB-D).

To define the beginning, end, and junction of the duplication more precisely, we cloned and sequenced each of these regions from isolate G4B1.2 and its dosR::hyg derivatives. The details of how these fragments were obtained are provided in Materials and Methods, and the resultant genetic maps are presented in Fig. 4 A to C. Note that the sequences are almost identical to the published H37Rv sequence (8) except for a small number of 1.3-kb insertions comprising the genes associated with the IS6110 insertion sequence element. At the beginning of the duplication, there is an IS6110 inserted at position 744 of Rv3128c that results in this gene being truncated (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, this particular IS6110 insertion has previously been reported as being characteristic of modern or “typical” W/Beijing isolates, with its location often referred to as the NTF region (3). At the end of the duplication, an IS6110 has inserted itself between Rv3427c and Rv3428c (Fig. 4B). At the junction of the two copies of the duplication, an IS6110 is inserted 307 bp downstream of Rv3427c and disrupts Rv3128c at position 740 (Fig. 4C).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Genetic map and PCR-based screening for identifying isolates bearing the 350-kb duplication. The genetic arrangement of the cloned fragments representing the beginning (A), end (B), and junction (C) regions of the duplication is shown. Genes present in “Copy 1” of the duplication are indicated in black, while those in “Copy 2” are in dark gray. The three sets of primers used to screen for the presence of the duplication in clinical isolates are highlighted (boxed). The screening method is based on detecting the IS6110 transposase insertions (white) located in the beginning (A and D), end (B and E), and junction (C and F) regions. (D to F) Lanes: 1, M. tuberculosis West African-I; 2, M. bovis BCG; 3, M. bovis; 4, M. canetti; 5 and 6, M. tuberculosis Indo-Oceanic (I-O) lineage; 7 and 8, East African-Indian (E-A-I); 9 and 10, Euro-American (E-A); 11 and 12, W/Beijing group 1 (G-1); 13 and 14, W/Beijing group 2 (G-2); 15 to 20, W/Beijing group 3 (G-3); 21 to 24, W/Beijing group 4 (G-4); 25 to 28, W/Beijing group 5 (G-5); 29, negative control. In the example shown, the W/Beijing isolates in lanes 23 and 24 (group 4) and in lanes 27 and 28 (group 5) are positive in all three reactions, suggesting that they contain the full duplication.

Together, these sequence data confirm the direct, tandem arrangement of the HN878 and G4B1.2 duplication and support the microarray data indicating that the duplication encompasses genes Rv3128c to Rv3427c. The fact that copies of IS6110 are found at the beginning, end, and junction of the duplication is highly suggestive that its mechanism of formation involved unequal homologous recombination mediated by complementary IS6110 elements located on sister chromatids (2).

The 350-kb duplication is restricted to the most recently evolved W/Beijing isolates.

The discovery of a large chromosomal duplication in two W/Beijing clinical isolates obviously raises a question regarding its frequency across distinct M. tuberculosis lineages. To address this question, we screened a panel of 126 isolates representing each of the major M. tuberculosis lineages (plus additional members of the M. tuberculosis complex [MTC], namely, M. canetti, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG, and Mycobacterium caprae) by PCR for the presence of the 350-kb duplication. For each isolate, three separate PCRs were carried out using primers anchored across the IS6110 insertion sites located at the beginning (Fig. 4A), end (Fig. 4B), and junction (Fig. 4C) of the duplication. Only isolates positive in all three PCRs were considered to be potentially positive for the full-length duplication. A representative example of these results is shown in Fig. 4D to F. When isolates possess a copy of IS6110 at the beginning of the duplication, a 1.7-kb PCR product is obtained (Fig. 4D, lanes 19 to 28), whereas a product of 421 bp indicates the absence of IS6110 at this location (lanes 1 to 18). Similarly, the presence or absence of IS6110 at the end of the duplication is revealed by products of 1.7 kb (Fig. 4E, lanes 17 to 28) or 372 bp, respectively. Lastly, the appearance of the novel junction region is confirmed with a 1.6-kb PCR product (Fig. 4F, lanes 23, 24, 27, and 28). A negative result here is indicative of a lack of the junction region and of the 350-kb duplication. The results of these experiments are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Distribution of the 350-kb duplication in M. tuberculosis clinical isolates

Isolate group na No. of isolates with IS6110 transposase atb:
No. of isolates with results confirmed byd:
Southern blotting
DNA microarray
Beginning Junction End Dupl+ Dupl Dupl+ Dupl
Non-W/Beijing 33 0 0 0c ND ND ND ND
Group 1 6 0 0 0 ND ND ND ND
Group 2 2 0 0 0 ND ND ND ND
Group 3 61 42 3 54 ND ND ND ND
Group 4 14 14 6 13 6 (6) 8 (8) 3 (3) 1 (1)
Group 5 10 10 4 10 4 (4) 4 (4) 2 (2) 3 (3)
Total 126 66 13 77 10 12 5 4
a

Number of isolates screened in each group.

b

Isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of the IS6110 transposase at each of the regions indicated. See Fig. 4 for further details.

c

No “end” product was detected for 6 strains. This is due to the RD6 deletion that occurs in M. bovis, M. canetti, and some M. tuberculosis isolates (5).

d

PCR screening results were confirmed by Southern blotting for 22 isolates and by DNA microarray for 9 isolates. The number of isolates in each group that were tested by the methods indicated is given in parentheses. Dupl+, duplication positive; Dupl, duplication negative. ND, not done.

None of the non-W/Beijing isolates tested (9 Euro-American, 8 Indo-Oceanic, 8 East African-Indian, 4 West African, and 4 MTC) harbored copies of IS6110 at the beginning or end of the duplication and, consequently, were also negative for the junction region (Table 2). The same result was obtained for the W/Beijing isolates belonging to groups 1 and 2. Among the 61 group 3 isolates that were tested, 54 contain a copy of IS6110 at the end of the duplication and 42 of these were also positive for the IS6110 at the beginning of the duplication. This result suggests that acquisition of the IS6110 at the end of the duplication was an earlier evolutionary event than acquisition of IS6110 at the beginning of the duplication. Three isolates of group 3 (5%) were also positive for the junction region, consistent with the original acquisition of the 350-kb duplication having taken place within this sublineage. All group 4 and 5 W/Beijing isolates that were tested have IS6110 at the beginning of the duplication, and all but one of these was positive for IS6110 at the end of the duplication. This peculiar isolate (group 4) was completely negative in the PCR screen for the end of the duplication and gave a smaller than expected hybridization product for a Southern blot probed with alr. Although not confirmed, it is likely that this strain contains the RD6 deletion that is variably deleted in a range of M. tuberculosis and MTC strains (5). Among the group 4 (n = 14) and group 5 (n = 10) W/Beijing isolates that we currently have available, 6 isolates belonging to group 4 (43%) and 4 isolates belonging to group 5 (40%) contain the junction region and were therefore considered positive for the 350-kb duplication.

Confirmation of the validity of the PCR screening results was achieved by Southern blotting of the group 4 and 5 isolates using an alr probe. Nine of these samples (including the HN878 and G4B1.2 isolates analyzed above) were further confirmed by whole-genome microarray (Table 2) (GEO accession number GSE20917). In order to select unique isolates for the array experiments, IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP) was carried out, the results of which are shown in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material. In summary, for our strain set, we detected the duplication only in group 3 to 5 isolates, which is highly suggestive that its acquisition has been a relatively recent event along the evolutionary path of the W/Beijing lineage.

The 350-kb W/Beijing duplication is unstable in vitro.

As indicated above, several anomalies were noted for our HN878 stock when analyzed by either Southern blot or microarray analysis (Fig. 2; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). In addition, in a parallel project under way in our laboratory, we recently isolated a HN878 tgs1::hyg strain that was found not to contain the 350-kb duplication. Unlike the other clinical isolates analyzed in this study, HN878 is a strain that was originally isolated in the mid 1990s and has passed through multiple laboratories since that time (32). Together, these observations raise the possibility that the 350-kb duplication is in the process of being lost from in vitro stocks of HN878. We, and others, have previously noted a related example of in vitro genomic decay that is associated with the loss of phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM) biosynthesis from H37Rv (10). In order to address this issue, an in vitro stock culture of HN878 was plated to obtain isolated single colonies, and 40 individual clones were screened for the presence of the 350-kb duplication by PCR as shown in Fig. 4. Only 7 clones appeared to contain an intact duplication, and 33 were found to have lost it either partially or completely. We then selected two of these laboratory-derived HN878 subclones for further analysis via genomic microarray. As demonstrated in Fig. S3 in the supplemental material, the HN878-wt-45 subclone (wt, wild type) contains the full-length 350-kb duplication, whereas HN878-wt-27 has lost it completely. We have also identified some interesting variations on this theme for a small number of our HN878 dosR::hyg recombinants. For example, additional array comparisons have revealed that strains HN878-25 and -28 (dosR2::hyg) (Fig. 5 B; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) retain a partial duplication of approximately 220 kb encompassing genes Rv3128c to Rv3324c (see Fig. S3). Similarly, clone HN878-58 (dosR1::hyg) (Fig. 5B) retains a duplication of approximately 295 kb that extends from Rv3180c to Rv3427c (see Fig. S3) and therefore harbors only one copy of dosR that has been disrupted through insertion of the hyg cassette.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Impact of the W/Beijing duplication on dosR expression. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of dosR expression in the wild type (wt) and the single or double dosR mutant strains indicated in panel B. The expression levels of dosR are normalized to the sigA housekeeping gene and are plotted relative to H37Rv. Each sample was assayed in quadruplicate, and at least two independent biological replicates were analyzed for each strain. Data from a single representative experiment are presented. Error bars represent standard deviation. (B) Schematic representation depicting the duplication and dosR genotypes for each of the strains analyzed in panel A. Further details for each strain can be found in the text.

The duplication event is not responsible for the constitutive overexpression of dosR by W/Beijing isolates.

To investigate the effect that two copies of dosR and/or the 350-kb duplication has on dosR expression levels, we quantified the expression of dosR by qRT-PCR in the strains indicated in Fig. 5. As seen previously, the dosR levels were 1 log higher in the wild-type G4B1.2 (Fig. 5A, lane 1) and HN878-45 (lane 7) isolates than in H37Rv (lane 5). Inactivation of either copy of the dosR gene leads to a reduction in dosR expression levels by 40 to 60% (lanes 2, 3, 9, and 10). A similar reduction was observed with the HN878-wt-27 strain that has lost the entire 350-kb duplication and contains only one copy of dosR (lane 8). As expected, no dosR expression was detected for any of the strains that lack a functional copy of dosR, including the double dosR knockout strain generated in the G4B1.2 background (G4B1.2-67 [dosR1::kan dosR2::hyg]; see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material) (Fig. 5A, lanes 4, 6, and 11). These results demonstrate that although there is an enhancement of dosR expression in strains bearing two copies of the dosR gene, the 350-kb duplication itself is not sufficient or responsible for the constitutive dosR phenotype displayed by W/Beijing isolates. This finding is consistent with a recent publication of ours demonstrating that the DosR regulon phenotype is associated with all group 2 to 5 W/Beijing isolates (13). In comparison, the duplication we describe herein is restricted to a subset of strains within the most recently evolved sublineages of the W/Beijing family.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, the massive W/Beijing-specific duplication described herein is the first large-scale genomic remodeling event of its type ever to be recorded for M. tuberculosis. Moreover, what makes this duplication event particularly remarkable is that it has almost certainly evolved in response to some form of selective force exerted inside the host. While chromosomal duplications have been reported for other nonpathogenic mycobacteria, each of these has clearly been selected for through continuous in vitro passage. In Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155, a 56-kb duplication that is flanked by two copies of an IS1096 element has been identified (37). The ATCC 607 progenitor does not contain the 56-kb duplication. Similarly, two independent tandem duplications have been described for the M. bovis BCG vaccine strain that was attenuated through continuous in vitro passage over a period of 13 years (4). DU1 is a 29-kb duplication that is present only in BCG Pasteur. DU2 initially arose as a 141-kb duplication and now exists in four different forms as a result of subsequent internal deletions.

Although it is difficult to completely exclude the possibility that the 350-kb W/Beijing duplication arose spontaneously in vitro during the process of bacterial isolation from patient samples, there are several lines of evidence that suggest that this is highly unlikely. First, the duplication is detected only in a select group of W/Beijing patient isolates, and aside from HN878, none of these has undergone multiple rounds of in vitro passage or extended periods of in vitro culture. Second, for the HN878 strain, which is the only one of these isolates that has spent any length of time in culture, we observe that the duplication appears to be highly unstable. This is not at all surprising given the presumed high energetic cost of maintaining duplicate copies of more than 300 genes in the absence of positive selective pressure. Third, if the acquisition of any part of the duplicated region enhanced in vitro “fitness” to any significant degree, we would expect to observe the entire 350 kb, or a subregion thereof, duplicated in many more isolates when cultivated in vitro than just the related group 3, 4, and 5 W/Beijing isolates described here. As highlighted above, no such duplication has been noted previously for M. tuberculosis.

Among 126 isolates tested, the 350-kb duplication was restricted to only 5% of group 3 isolates and approximately half of the group 4 and 5 isolates of the W/Beijing family, suggesting that the original duplication event has occurred relatively recently in the evolution of the M. tuberculosis genome. Our results indicate that the duplication initially arose in a group 3 isolate, the progeny of which independently gave rise to both the group 4 and 5 sublineages (note that group 5 is not a sublineage of group 4) (14). Over time, a proportion of isolates appear to have resolved the duplication either because it has not been continuously selected or because a more stable mutational event (e.g., point mutation) has supplanted the need for the duplication. Indeed, gene duplications and amplifications appear relatively frequently within bacterial populations but typically disappear after just a few generations of growth in the absence of selection (2). They most often provide an adaptive response to the presence of toxic compounds or antibiotics or nutrient starvation or to compensate for a deleterious mutation (2). In addition, there are several examples, including Vibrio cholerae and Haemophilus influenzae, where duplications have been selected within the host in order to increase toxin or capsule production that results in enhanced virulence (6, 23).

The fact that such a large duplication is maintained with some frequency in at least two independent sublineages of the W/Beijing family would suggest that it is being maintained through selection in some specific host populations. Without selection, we suspect that this duplication would have been lost long ago, as appears to be occurring with our in vitro HN878 cultures. Exactly what that selective pressure is remains to be seen, although it is tempting to speculate that the duplication is associated with enhanced in vivo fitness (virulence) or antibiotic tolerance/resistance. In this regard, we note with great interest the two recent molecular epidemiological studies reporting a significant association between the more recently evolved W/Beijing sublineages and (i) an increased ability to transmit and cause disease in the Western Cape region of South Africa (18) and (ii) an increased ability to cause extrathoracic TB (20). In both of these studies, the W/Beijing strains referred to are the group 4 and 5 isolates, i.e., the same sublineages for which we observe the 350-kb duplication.

The global increase in BCG vaccination and the distribution of anti-TB drugs are two recent events that could potentially have contributed to selection of the W/Beijing duplication. The former possibility is particularly interesting in light of suggestions that the recent increase in mass immunization programs involving BCG may have inadvertently selected for the emergence of W/Beijing strains on a global basis (7, 21, 26). It is also tempting to speculate that the duplication may enhance the in vivo fitness of W/Beijing strains in the face of growing antibiotic use, given that the recent epidemic spread of W/Beijing strains is often associated with the development of drug resistance (3, 15, 25). To date, preliminary screens have failed to reveal any significant difference in the in vitro MICs when isolates harboring the 350-kb duplication (HN878-wt-45 and G4B1.2) are compared to those lacking the duplication (HN878-wt-27 and H37Rv) for any of the following compounds: isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, cycloserine, kanamycin, ofloxacin, or streptomycin. However, this certainly does not rule out the possibility of an effect of the duplication on drug sensitivity or tolerance in vivo. Clearly, additional studies are warranted in order to evaluate the potential implications of the massive W/Beijing duplication on the spread and development of TB disease.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant MOP82931. M.B.R. is supported by a Peter Lougheed/CIHR New Investigator Award, while P.D. is supported by a Montreal General Hospital 175th Anniversary Fellowship.

We thank Christophe Guilhot for sharing the mycobacterial allelic exchange system and Peter Small for providing access to clinical isolates. We are also indebted to Marcel Behr and Fiona McIntosh for assistance with the microarray and RFLP experiments.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 16 July 2010.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alland, D., D. W. Lacher, M. H. Hazbon, A. S. Motiwala, W. Qi, R. D. Fleischmann, and T. S. Whittam. 2007. Role of large sequence polymorphisms (LSPs) in generating genomic diversity among clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the utility of LSPs in phylogenetic analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:39-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andersson, D. I., and D. Hughes. 2009. Gene amplification and adaptive evolution in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43:167-195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bifani, P. J., B. Mathema, N. E. Kurepina, and B. N. Kreiswirth. 2002. Global dissemination of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis W-Beijing family strains. Trends Microbiol. 10:45-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brosch, R., S. V. Gordon, T. Garnier, K. Eiglmeier, W. Frigui, P. Valenti, S. Dos Santos, S. Duthoy, C. Lacroix, C. Garcia-Pelayo, J. K. Inwald, P. Golby, J. N. Garcia, R. G. Hewinson, M. A. Behr, M. A. Quail, C. Churcher, B. G. Barrell, J. Parkhill, and S. T. Cole. 2007. Genome plasticity of BCG and impact on vaccine efficacy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:5596-5601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brosch, R., S. V. Gordon, M. Marmiesse, P. Brodin, C. Buchrieser, K. Eiglmeier, T. Garnier, C. Gutierrez, G. Hewinson, K. Kremer, L. M. Parsons, A. S. Pym, S. Samper, D. van Soolingen, and S. T. Cole. 2002. A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:3684-3689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cerquetti, M., R. Cardines, M. Giufre, A. Castella, M. Rebora, P. Mastrantonio, and M. L. Ciofi Degli Atti. 2006. Detection of six copies of the capsulation b locus in a Haemophilus influenzae type b strain isolated from a splenectomized patient with fulminant septic shock. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:640-642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohen, T., C. Colijn, and M. Murray. 2008. Modeling the effects of strain diversity and mechanisms of strain competition on the potential performance of new tuberculosis vaccines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:16302-16307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cole, S. T., R. Brosch, J. Parkhill, T. Garnier, C. Churcher, D. Harris, S. V. Gordon, K. Eiglmeier, S. Gas, C. E. Barry III, F. Tekaia, K. Badcock, D. Basham, D. Brown, T. Chillingworth, R. Connor, R. Davies, K. Devlin, T. Feltwell, S. Gentles, N. Hamlin, S. Holroyd, T. Hornsby, K. Jagels, A. Krogh, J. McLean, S. Moule, L. Murphy, K. Oliver, J. Osborne, M. A. Quail, M. A. Rajandream, J. Rogers, S. Rutter, K. Seeger, J. Skelton, R. Squares, S. Squares, J. E. Sulston, K. Taylor, S. Whitehead, and B. G. Barrell. 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537-544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cowley, D., D. Govender, B. February, M. Wolfe, L. Steyn, J. Evans, R. J. Wilkinson, and M. P. Nicol. 2008. Recent and rapid emergence of W-Beijing strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:1252-1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Domenech, P., and M. B. Reed. 2009. Rapid and spontaneous loss of phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis grown in vitro: implications for virulence studies. Microbiology 155:3532-3543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Domenech, P., M. B. Reed, and C. E. Barry III. 2005. Contribution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MmpL protein family to virulence and drug resistance. Infect. Immun. 73:3492-3501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.European Concerted Action on New Generation Genetic Markers and Techniques for the Epidemiology and Control of Tuberculosis. 2006. Beijing/W genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance. Emerging Infect. Dis. 12:736-743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fallow, A., P. Domenech, and M. B. Reed. 2010. Strains of the East Asian (W/Beijing) lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are DosS/DosT-DosR two-component regulatory system natural mutants. J. Bacteriol. 192:2228-2238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gagneux, S., K. DeRiemer, T. Van, M. Kato-Maeda, B. C. de Jong, S. Narayanan, M. Nicol, S. Niemann, K. Kremer, M. C. Gutierrez, M. Hilty, P. C. Hopewell, and P. M. Small. 2006. Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:2869-2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Glynn, J. R., J. Whiteley, P. J. Bifani, K. Kremer, and D. van Soolingen. 2002. Worldwide occurrence of Beijing/W strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review. Emerging Infect. Dis. 8:843-849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gutacker, M. M., B. Mathema, H. Soini, E. Shashkina, B. N. Kreiswirth, E. A. Graviss, and J. M. Musser. 2006. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-based population genetic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from 4 geographic sites. J. Infect. Dis. 193:121-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hanekom, M., G. D. van der Spuy, N. C. Gey van Pittius, C. R. McEvoy, S. L. Ndabambi, T. C. Victor, E. G. Hoal, P. D. van Helden, and R. M. Warren. 2007. Evidence that the spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with the Beijing genotype is human population dependent. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2263-2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanekom, M., G. D. van der Spuy, E. Streicher, S. L. Ndabambi, C. R. McEvoy, M. Kidd, N. Beyers, T. C. Victor, P. D. van Helden, and R. M. Warren. 2007. A recently evolved sublineage of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing strain family is associated with an increased ability to spread and cause disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1483-1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hershberg, R., M. Lipatov, P. M. Small, H. Sheffer, S. Niemann, S. Homolka, J. C. Roach, K. Kremer, D. A. Petrov, M. W. Feldman, and S. Gagneux. 2008. High functional diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis driven by genetic drift and human demography. PLoS Biol. 6:e311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kong, Y., M. D. Cave, L. Zhang, B. Foxman, C. F. Marrs, J. H. Bates, and Z. H. Yang. 2007. Association between Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing/W lineage strain infection and extrathoracic tuberculosis: insights from epidemiologic and clinical characterization of the three principal genetic groups of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:409-414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kremer, K., M. J. van der Werf, B. K. Au, D. D. Anh, K. M. Kam, H. R. van Doorn, M. W. Borgdorff, and D. van Soolingen. 2009. Vaccine-induced immunity circumvented by typical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing strains. Emerging Infect. Dis. 15:335-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McEvoy, C. R., A. A. Falmer, N. C. Gey van Pittius, T. C. Victor, P. D. van Helden, and R. M. Warren. 2007. The role of IS6110 in the evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 87:393-404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mekalanos, J. J. 1983. Duplication and amplification of toxin genes in Vibrio cholerae. Cell 35:253-263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ó Gaora, P., S. Barnini, C. Hayward, E. Filley, G. Rook, D. Young, and J. Tholea. 1997. Mycobacteria as immunogens: development of expression vectors for use in multiple mycobacterial species. Med. Princ. Pract. 6:91-96. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parwati, I., B. Alisjahbana, L. Apriani, R. D. Soetikno, T. H. Ottenhoff, A. G. van der Zanden, J. van der Meer, D. van Soolingen, and R. van Crevel. 2010. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype is an independent risk factor for tuberculosis treatment failure in Indonesia. J. Infect. Dis. 201:553-557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parwati, I., R. van Crevel, and D. van Soolingen. 2010. Possible underlying mechanisms for successful emergence of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype strains. Lancet Infect. Dis. 10:103-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pelicic, V., M. Jackson, J. M. Reyrat, W. R. Jacobs, Jr., B. Gicquel, and C. Guilhot. 1997. Efficient allelic exchange and transposon mutagenesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:10955-10960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reed, M. B., S. Gagneux, K. Deriemer, P. M. Small, and C. E. Barry III. 2007. The W-Beijing lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis overproduces triglycerides and has the DosR dormancy regulon constitutively upregulated. J. Bacteriol. 189:2583-2589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reed, M. B., V. K. Pichler, F. McIntosh, A. Mattia, A. Fallow, S. Masala, P. Domenech, A. Zwerling, L. Thibert, D. Menzies, K. Schwartzman, and M. A. Behr. 2009. Major Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages associate with patient country of origin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1119-1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smith, N. H., R. G. Hewinson, K. Kremer, R. Brosch, and S. V. Gordon. 2009. Myths and misconceptions: the origin and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:537-544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Snapper, S. B., R. E. Melton, S. Mustafa, T. Kieser, and W. R. Jacobs, Jr. 1990. Isolation and characterization of efficient plasmid transformation mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1911-1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sreevatsan, S., X. Pan, K. E. Stockbauer, N. D. Connell, B. N. Kreiswirth, T. S. Whittam, and J. M. Musser. 1997. Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:9869-9874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stover, C. K., V. F. de la Cruz, T. R. Fuerst, J. E. Burlein, L. A. Benson, L. T. Bennett, G. P. Bansal, J. F. Young, M. H. Lee, G. F. Hatfull, S. B. Snapper, R. G. Barletta, W. R. Jacobs, and B. R. Bloom. 1991. New use of BCG for recombinant vaccines. Nature 351:456-460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tsolaki, A. G., S. Gagneux, A. S. Pym, Y. O. Goguet de la Salmoniere, B. N. Kreiswirth, D. Van Soolingen, and P. M. Small. 2005. Genomic deletions classify the Beijing/W strains as a distinct genetic lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3185-3191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tsolaki, A. G., A. E. Hirsh, K. DeRiemer, J. A. Enciso, M. Z. Wong, M. Hannan, Y. O. Goguet de la Salmoniere, K. Aman, M. Kato-Maeda, and P. M. Small. 2004. Functional and evolutionary genomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: insights from genomic deletions in 100 strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:4865-4870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Valway, S. E., M. P. Sanchez, T. F. Shinnick, I. Orme, T. Agerton, D. Hoy, J. S. Jones, H. Westmoreland, and I. M. Onorato. 1998. An outbreak involving extensive transmission of a virulent strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 338:633-639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang, X. M., A. Galamba, D. F. Warner, K. Soetaert, J. S. Merkel, M. Kalai, P. Bifani, P. Lefevre, V. Mizrahi, and J. Content. 2008. IS1096-mediated DNA rearrangements play a key role in genome evolution of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 88:399-409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wirth, T., F. Hildebrand, C. Allix-Beguec, F. Wolbeling, T. Kubica, K. Kremer, D. van Soolingen, S. Rusch-Gerdes, C. Locht, S. Brisse, A. Meyer, P. Supply, and S. Niemann. 2008. Origin, spread and demography of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yu, J., M. I. Othman, R. Farjo, S. Zareparsi, S. P. MacNee, S. Yoshida, and A. Swaroop. 2002. Evaluation and optimization of procedures for target labeling and hybridization of cDNA microarrays. Mol. Vis. 8:130-137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES