Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Nov 29;128(6):1585–1588. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701186

Polymorphisms of TP53 Arg72Pro, but not p73 G4C14>A4TA4 and p21 Ser31Arg, contribute to risk of cutaneous melanoma

Chunying Li 1,6, Kexin Chen 1, Zhensheng Liu 1, Li-E Wang 1, Jeffrey E Gershenwald 2, Jeffrey E Lee 2, Victor G Prieto 3, Madeleine Duvic 4, Elizabeth A Grimm 5, Qingyi Wei 1
PMCID: PMC2938047  NIHMSID: NIHMS231975  PMID: 18049450

TO THE EDITOR

TP53 responds to diverse stresses, including UVR-induced DNA damage, and regulates many downstream genes to initiate cell-cycle arrest, DNA repair or apoptosis (Kaelin, 1999; Robles and Harris, 2001). TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in all forms of human cancers (Hussain and Harris, 1999). In addition to mutations, other genetic events, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TP53 gene, have been shown to contribute to the development of CM (Han et al., 2006; Stefanaki et al., 2007). The TP53 gene is located at chromosome 17p13.1 and reportedly has a total of 126 SNPs (http://egp.gs.washington.edu/data/tTP53/tTP53x.csnps.txt). The most frequently studied SNP is a G-to-C substitution in codon 72, the only known common (i.e., a minor allele frequency > 0.05) non-synonymous (potentially functional) SNP that results in an arginine-to-proline change.

As one of the homologues of TP53, p73 shares a similar molecular structure with TP53 (Jost et al., 1997), playing an important role in carcinogenesis either in the absence of TP53 or independent of TP53 (Kaghad et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2001). Although mutations in p73 are relatively uncommon, there are two completely linked common SNPs in the non-coding region of exon 2 (4 G to A and 14 C to T) that may influence the efficiency of translation initiation and thus may alter cancer risk (Hu et al., 2005; Li et al., 2004). In addition, many other genes are involved in cell-cycle checkpoints, including cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and CDK inhibitors (CDKI). For example, p21 (Waf1/Cip1/CDKN1A) is a CDKI and one of the downstream molecules of TP53. In response to DNA damage, TP53 upregulates p21 expression, leading to either cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis (Xiong et al., 1993). The p21 gene is located on chromosome 6p21.2, having least 48 SNPs (http://egp.gs.washington.edu/data/cdkn1a/cdk1a.csnps.txt), among which a C-to-A change in exon 2 is the only common non-synonymous SNP, resulting in a serine-to-arginine change at codon 31 that may have a functional relevance.

Previously, we reported in a relatively small study that the p53 Arg/Arg genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of melanoma compared with other genotypes (Shen et al., 2003). To further extend this finding and explore its interaction with variants of other genes, we genotyped for these three functional SNPs (i.e., TP53 Arg72Pro, p73 G4C14>A4T14 and p21 Ser31Arg) in 805 non-Hispanic White CM patients and 838 controls frequency matched by age and sex as previously described (Li et al., 2005; Li et al., 2004; Shen et al., 2003). We found that an increased risk of CM was associated with the TP53 Arg/Arg genotype (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.55), compared with the TP53 Pro/Pro+Arg/Pro genotype, after adjustment for age and sex, but not with the p73 G4C14>A4T14 or p21 Ser31Arg polymorphisms (Table 1), because variant homozygotes for p73and p21 were relatively uncommon. Further analyses of their combined genotypes revealed some non-significantly elevated CM risk due to reduced sample sizes in the strata (Table 2), although this large study confirmed the association between the p53 Arg/Arg genotype and increased CM risk (Shen et al., 2003).

Table 1.

Genotype and allele frequencies of the TP53 Arg72Pro, p73 G4C14>A4T14 and p21 Ser31Arg polymorphisms and their associations with risk of CM

Genotype Patients (n = 805) Controls (n = 838)1 p value2 Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)3 Adjusted OR (95% CI)4

N % N %
TP53 Arg72Pro 0.029
Pro/Pro5 40 5.0 56 6.7 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arg/Pro 300 37.2 350 41.8 1.20 (0.77–1.85) 1.20 (0.78–1.86) 1.28 (0.73–2.23)
Arg/Arg 465 57.8 432 51.5 1.51 (0.98–2.31) 1.50 (0.98–2.30) 1.50 (0.87–2.60)
Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro 6 340 42.2 406 48.5 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arg/Arg 465 57.8 432 51.5 1.28 (1.05–1.55) 1.28 (1.05–1.55) 1.21 (0.95–1.56)
Pro allele frequency 0.236 0.276 0.010
p73 G4C14>A4T14 0.377
GC/GC 5 468 58.1 497 59.3 1.00 1.00 1.00
GC/AT 287 35.7 302 36.0 1.01 (0.82–1.24) 1.01 (0.82–1.24) 1.01 (0.84–1.41)
AT/AT 50 6.2 39 4.7 1.37 (0.88–2.12) 1.37 (0.88–2.12) 1.33 (0.76–2.33)
GC/AT+GC/GC5 755 93.8 799 95.4 0.163 1.00 1.00 1.00
AT/AT 50 6.2 39 4.7 1.36 (0.89–2.10) 1.36 (0.89–2.10) 1.29 (0.75-2.24)
AT allele frequency 0.24 0.227 0.401
p21 Ser31Arg 0.815
Ser/Ser 5 695 86.3 731 87.2 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ser/Arg 106 13.2 104 12.4 1.07 (0.80–1.43) 1.06 (0.79–1.41) 1.29 (0.88–1.90)
Arg/Arg 4 0.5 3 0.4 1.40 (0.31–6.28) 1.48 (0.33–6.65) 1.33 (0.18–9.82)
Ser/Arg+Arg/Arg 110 13.7 107 12.8 0.592 1.08 (0.81–1.44) 1.07 (0.80–1.42) 1.30 (0.88–1.89)
Arg allele frequency 0.071 0.066 0.618
1

The observed genotype frequency among the control subjects was in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Chi-square test = 1.763, p = 0.184 for TP53 Arg72Pro; χ2 = 0.646, p = 0.422 for p73 G4C14>A4T14; and χ2 = 0.118, p = 0.731 for p21 Ser31Arg).

2

Two-sided χ2 test for either genotype distribution or allele frequency.

3

ORs were adjusted for age and sex.

4

ORs were adjusted for age, sex, skin color eye color, hair color, tanning ability, life time number of sunburns with blistering, freckling in the sun as a child, presence of moles or dyplastic nevi and family history of cancer (cases=700 and controls=513 due to missing data).

5

Individual comparison reference.

6

Combine comparison reference.

Table 2.

Combined genotype frequencies of the TP53 Arg72Pro, p73 G4C14>A4T14 and p21 Ser31Arg polymorphisms and their associations with risk of CM

Combined Genotypes Patients (n = 805) Controls (n = 838) p value1 Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)2 Adjusted OR (95% CI)3

N (%) N (%)
TP53 Arg72Pro p21 Ser31Arg 0.061
Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro Ser/Ser 287 (35.6) 353 (42.1) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arg/Arg Ser/Ser 408 (50.7) 378 (45.1) 1.33 (1.08–1.64) 1.32 (1.07–1.63) 1.25 (0.95–1.63)
Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro Ser/Arg+Arg/Arg 53 (6.6) 53 (6.3) 1.23 (0.82–1.86) 1.21 (0.80–1.83) 1.42 (0.83–2.43)
Arg/Arg Ser/Arg+Arg/Arg 57 (7.1) 54 (6.5) 1.30 (0.87–1.94) 1.28 (0.86–1.92) 1.51 (0.88–2.58)
TP53 Arg72Pro p73 G4C14>A4T14 0.089
Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro GC/GC+GC/AT 317 (39.4) 385 (45.9) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arg/Arg GC/GC+GC/AT 438 (54.4) 414 (49.4) 1.29 (1.05–1.57) 1.28 (1.05–1.56) 1.22 (0.94–1.57)
Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro AT/AT 23 (2.9) 21 (2.5) 1.33 (0.72–2.45) 1.34 (0.72–2.46) 1.32 (0.59–2.95)
Arg/Arg AT/AT 27 (3.3) 18 (2.2) 1.82 (0.99–3.37) 1.82 (0.99–3.38) 1.56 (0.73–3.32)
p73 G4C14>A4T14 p21 Ser31Arg 0.916
GC/GC+GC/AT Ser/Ser 653 (81.1) 696 (83.0) 1.00 1.00 1.00
GC/GC+GC/AT Ser/Arg+Arg/Arg 102 (12.7) 103 (12.3) 1.06 (0.79–1.42) 1.04 (0.78–1.40) 1.24 (0.84–1.83)
AT/AT Ser/Ser 42 (5.2) 35 (4.2) 1.28 (0.81–2.03) 1.29 (0.81–2.05) 1.17 (0.64–2.12)
AT/AT Ser/Arg+Arg/Arg 8 (1.0) 4 (0.5) 2.13 (0.64–7.11) 2.07 (0.62–6.91) 2.58 (0.63–10.5)
1

Two-sided chi-square test for distributions of genotypic frequencies between the patients and controls.

2

ORs were obtained from a multivariate logistic regression model with adjustment for age and sex.

3

ORs were adjusted for age, sex, skin color eye color, hair color, tanning ability, life time number of sunburns with blistering, freckling in the sun as a child, presence of moles or dyplastic nevi and family history of cancer (cases=700 and controls=513 due to missing data).

The G-to-C transition at codon 72 in exon 4 resides in a proline-rich region of TP53 and results in the Arg to Pro substitution, which is essential for TP53-mediated apoptosis. However, bioinformatics analyses by both sorting intolerant from tolerant and polymorphism phenotyping predict TP53 Arg72Pro as a benign change (http://egp.gs.washington.edu/data/tTP53/tTP53x.pph-sift.txt). Our present finding is also consistent with the result of a recently published study of 596 Scottish melanoma patients and 441 population-based controls (Povey et al., 2007), in which the frequency of the TP53 Arg/Arg genotype was 57.1% in patients and 53.7% in controls, compared to our result of 57.8% in 805 patients and 51.5% in 838 controls. However, in a Greek study (Stefanaki et al., 2007) of 107 patients with CM and 145 controls and a U.S. Nurses’ Health Study (Han et al., 2006) of 219 patients with melanoma and 874 controls, the Arg variant genotypes were associated with a non-significantly reduced CM risk. Given the discrepancies in these small studies, larger studies are needed to reconcile these findings.

Little is known about the association between genetic variations of the p73 gene and risk of CM. Although the exact functional relevance of the p73 AT variant allele remains unknown, studies have shown that the GC to AT change may lead to the formation of a stem-loop structure that may influence the translation efficacy (Kaghad et al., 1997). Moreover, it was found that 2 N-terminal splice variants of Tap73 (p73Δex2 and p73Δsx2/3) were increased in melanoma (Tuve et al., 2004). In the present study, our finding of an association between the AT homozygous genotypes (i.e., AT/AT) and a non-significantly increased risk of CM suggests that either our sample size was not large enough to detect a seemingly small risk, if any, or no risk was associated with the p73 AT/AT polymorphism.

As a CDKI, p21 is expected to increase the proliferation of tumor cells when its expression decreases. One study suggested that the loss of p21 may contribute to increased tumorigenic potential in either melanoma cell lines or human melanomas (Mouriaux et al., 1998). Because mutations in the p21 gene are infrequent in human melanomas (Vidal et al., 1995), we thought genetic variations in p21 may be an important factor that could modulate the p21 gene expression, but few studies have investigated the role of p21 polymorphisms in the etiology of CM. In a study with only 20 patients and 165 controls (Konishi et al., 2000), p21 Ser31Arg variant genotypes were found to be associated with a non-significantly increased risk of CM, which was consistent with our finding in the current, much larger study. The functional relevance of the p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism is unknown, and no sorting tolerant from intolerant or polymorphism phenotyping prediction is available. In the present study, the frequency of homozygous p21 Arg/Arg genotype was too few to be meaningfully evaluated for its association with risk of CM, which warrants larger studies for further validation of our findings.

Acknowledgments

This study and research protocol with patient consent and adherence to the Helsinki Guidelines were approved by the M. D. Anderson institutional review board.

Supported in part by National Cancer Institute grants R01 CA 100264 (QW) and P50 CA 093459 (EAG) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grants R01 ES11740 (QW) and ES07784 and P30 CA16672 (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center). We thank Merrick I. Ross, Paul F. Mansfield, Janice N. Cormier, Margaret Lung, Cesar A. Maldonado, and Amanda Francofor assistance in recruiting the subjects, Zhaozheng Guo, Yawei Qiao, Jianzhong He, and Kejing Xu for laboratory assistance; Monica Domingue for assistance in preparing the manuscript; and Alyson Todd for scientific editing.

Abbreviations

CDK

cyclin-dependent kinase

CDKI

CDK inhibitor

CI

confidence interval

CM

cutaneous melanoma

OR

odds ratio

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

Polyphen

polymorphism phenotyping

SIFT

sorting intolerant from tolerant

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

UVR

ultraviolet radiation

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han J, Cox DG, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ. The p53 codon 72 polymorphism, sunburns, and risk of skin cancer in US Caucasian women. Mol Carcinog. 2006;45:694–700. doi: 10.1002/mc.20190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hu Z, Miao X, Ma H, Tan W, Wang X, Lu D, et al. Dinucleotide polymorphism of p73 gene is associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:455–460. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hussain SP, Harris CC. p53 mutation spectrum and load: the generation of hypotheses linking the exposure of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens to human cancer. Mutat Res. 1999;428:23–32. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(99)00028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jost CA, Marin MC, Kaelin WG., Jr p73 is a simian [correction of human] p53-related protein that can induce apoptosis. Nature. 1997;389:191–194. doi: 10.1038/38298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaelin WG., Jr The p53 gene family. Oncogene. 1999;18:7701–7705. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaghad M, Bonnet H, Yang A, Creancier L, Biscan JC, Valent A, et al. Monoallelically expressed gene related to p53 at 1p36, a region frequently deleted in neuroblastoma and other human cancers. Cell. 1997;90:809–819. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80540-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Konishi R, Sakatani S, Kiyokane K, Suzuki K. Polymorphisms of p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and malignant skin tumors. J Dermatol Sci. 2000;24:177–183. doi: 10.1016/s0923-1811(00)00096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li G, Liu Z, Sturgis EM, Shi Q, Chamberlain RM, Spitz MR, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of p21 are associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1596–1602. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li G, Wang LE, Chamberlain RM, Amos CI, Spitz MR, Wei Q. p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and risk of lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6863–6866. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mouriaux F, Casagrande F, Pillaire MJ, Manenti S, Malecaze F, Darbon JM. Differential expression of G1 cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in normal and transformed melanocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:876–884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Povey JE, Darakhshan F, Robertson K, Bisset Y, Mekky M, Rees J, et al. DNA repair gene polymorphisms and genetic predisposition to cutaneous melanoma. Carcinogenesis. 2007 doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robles AI, Harris CC. p53-mediated apoptosis and genomic instability diseases. Acta Oncol. 2001;40 :696–701. doi: 10.1080/02841860152619106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shen H, Liu Z, Strom SS, Spitz MR, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, et al. p53 codon 72 Arg homozygotes are associated with an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:1510–1514. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stefanaki I, Stratigos AJ, Dimisianos G, Nikolaou V, Papadopoulos O, Polydorou D, et al. p53 codon 72 Pro homozygosity increases the risk of cutaneous melanoma in individuals with dark skin complexion and among noncarriers of melanocortin 1 receptor red hair variants. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156:357–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07645.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tuve S, Wagner SN, Schittek B, Putzer BM. Alterations of DeltaTA-p 73 splice transcripts during melanoma development and progression. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:162–166. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vidal MJ, Loganzo F, Jr, de Oliveira AR, Hayward NK, Albino AP. Mutations and defective expression of the WAF1 p21 tumour-suppressor gene in malignant melanomas. Melanoma Res. 1995;5 :243–250. doi: 10.1097/00008390-199508000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang XQ, Ongkeko WM, Lau AW, Leung KM, Poon RY. A possible role of p73 on the modulation of p53 level through MDM2. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1598–1603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Xiong Y, Hannon GJ, Zhang H, Casso D, Kobayashi R, Beach D. p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature. 1993;366:701–704. doi: 10.1038/366701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES