Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Lipid Res. 2010 Apr 1;49(4):353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2010.03.003

Sterols and sphingolipids: Dynamic duo or partners in crime?

Sonia Gulati 1, Ying Liu 1, Andrew B Munkacsi 2, Lisa Wilcox 1, Stephen L Sturley 1,2
PMCID: PMC2938828  NIHMSID: NIHMS206285  PMID: 20362613

Abstract

One manner in which eukaryotic cells respond to their environments is by optimizing the composition and proportions of sterols and sphingolipids in membranes. The physical association of the planar ring of sterols with the acyl chains of phospholipids, particularly sphingolipids, produces membrane micro-heterogeneity that is exploited to coordinate several crucial pathways. We hypothesize that these lipid molecules play an integrated role in human disease; when one of the partners is mis-regulated, pathology frequently ensues. Sterols and sphingolipid levels are not coordinated by the action of a single master regulator, however the cross talk between their metabolic pathways is considerable. We describe our perspectives on the key components of synthesis, catabolism and transport of these lipid partners with an emphasis on evolutionarily conserved reactions that produce disease states when defective.

Keywords: yeast, ergosterol, cholesterol, ceramide, complex sphingolipids, membrane rafts

1. Introduction

Sterols and sphingolipids are evolutionarily conserved lipid molecules that collaborate to maintain the integrity of eukaryotic cellular membranes. These lipid complexes are asymmetrically distributed throughout the membrane, a phenomenon often explained by an “umbrella model”, which posits that cholesterol segregates into regions of membranes with strongly hydrated large head groups, like those found in sphingolipids. In this way, the sterol rings are effectively shielded from the aqueous environment. Moreover, the packing of cholesterol with saturated acyl chains of sphingolipids is entropically more favorable than with unsaturated acyl chains [1]. The coalescence of these lipids into membrane microdomains (rafts), likely functions to enhance the physical structure of the membrane as well as generate foci that integrate pathways such as lipid influx and efflux, protein trafficking, signal transduction, and even viral entry (reviewed, [2]).

Despite the integral role ascribed to rafts in various biological processes, their existence is controversial (reviewed, [3, 4]). This is partly because the majority of membrane microdomains are too small to resolve via conventional microscopy and have poorly defined morphology, unlike lipid bound organelles or even caveolae. As such the burden of proof for their existence has relied on the biochemical attributes of these complexes. The most accepted working definition of rafts is insolubility in cold non-ionic detergents, followed by flotation on sucrose-density gradients. Even this definition has provoked controversy as treatment of membranes with detergents can create artificial domains. However, it is widely accepted that the presence of both cholesterol and sphingomyelin in the plasma membrane is essential; removal of raft cholesterol with β-methylcyclodextrin or hydrolysis of membrane sphingolipids with sphingomyelinase, leads to dissociation and inactivation of most lipid micro-domain proteins [5, 6].

Cholesterol and sphingolipids and the complexes they form are clearly beneficial to the cell. They represent a “dynamic duo” that withstands and responds to the environmental challenges that cells encounter. However they are also “partners in crime” in that an imbalance in either lipid invariably results in a disease pathology. In addition to monogenic disorders such as Niemann-Pick diseases, it is likely that the coordinated homeostasis of these lipids underlies many polygenic disorders such as atherosclerosis and neurodegeneration. The premise of this review is that the co-affinity of these molecules is essential for membrane function and is subject to multiple layers of regulation. We present our perspectives on sterol and sphingolipid homeostasis with particular emphasis on processes that partner these molecules.

2. Sterol and sphingolipid synthesis

The asymmetrical allocation of sterols to the inner and outer layer of cellular membranes arises from the biochemical affinity of sterol for ceramides and its derivatives. This affinity may arise as early as the ER, the point of synthesis of sterols and ceramides. Accordingly, much of the ensuing membrane micro-heterogeneity reflects the coordinated synthesis of these molecules. As described below (Fig. 1), these pathways are not controlled by the action of a single master regulator. Instead, it is apparently the cross talk between the pathways that facilitates their coordination.

Figure 1. Sterol and sphingolipid biosynthetic pathways.

Figure 1

Yeast (italics and in red) and mammalian (underlined) gene designations of key enzymes are shown. Negative regulation of SREBP by ceramide represents a pivotal point of crosstalk between the mammalian sterol and sphingolipid pathways. SREBP regulates the mevalonate pathways at many points, however, for simplicity, the rate limiting reactions are depicted as targets. There is no clear ortholog of SREBP in yeast, although an analogous role is performed by the UPC2-encoded transcription factor [80]. CoA, Coenzyme A; HMG, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl; GPP, Geranyl Pyrophosphate; FPP, Farnesyl Pyrophosphate; IPC, Inositol Phosphoceramide; MIPC, Mannose Inositol Phosphoceramide; MIP2C, Mannose Di-Inositol Phospho-ceramide.

2.1. Sterol biosynthesis and its regulation

Although cholesterol biosynthesis occurs in all mammalian cells, this capacity is greatest in liver, adrenal cortex, and reproductive tissues. The synthesis of cholesterol is a multi-step process (Fig. 1) involving nearly 30 enzymes. The rate-limiting step of this pathway HMG-CoA reductase catalyses the formation of mevalonate and is also the target of cholesterol lowering pharmaceuticals such as the statins. Mevalonate is then subjected to a series of phosphorylations and a decarboxylation reaction to produce isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), an activated isoprenoid molecule. IPP is subsequently converted to squalene, which undergoes cyclization to produce lanosterol. Ultimately, lanosterol is converted to cholesterol through 19 additional reactions.

Cholesterol metabolism is transcriptionally regulated by sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs), a group of master regulators that control the feedback regulation of synthesis and uptake of many lipids, at many steps [7]. Cleavage of the membrane associated SREBP protein by two proteases in the Golgi complex releases a soluble amino-terminal transcription factor domain, which is then translocated to the nucleus to activate transcription of target genes [8]. Numerous accessory proteins (SREBP cleavage activating protein SCAP and INSIGs 1 or 2) and proteases (S1p and S2p) mediate the sensing of membrane composition and fluidity and the subsequent translocation and activation of the transcription factor (reviewed [7]). This process is repressed when cellular sterol concentrations peak; recent studies elegantly describe the manner in which ER cholesterol concentrations greater that 5 mol % are sufficient to block ER exit of SREBP and the cholesterol sensor, SCAP [9]. Further fine-tuning of cholesterol biosynthesis via post-translational regulation of HMG-CoA reductase is achieved through INSIG1 dependent proteasomal degradation, which also responds to cholesterol levels in the ER [10, 11].

2.2 De-novo sphingolipid biosynthesis and its regulation

Sphingolipids consist of a signature sphingoid long-chain base backbone modified by the addition of a fatty acid molecule (at C-2 to produce ceramide) and the subsequent addition of a hydrophilic head group to the OH group at C-1 to yield a variety of complex sphingolipoids (e.g. glycosphingolipids, sphingomyelin, inositol-P-ceramide etc.). These reactions span two organelles and involve at least 11 enzymes (Fig. 1). Eight are housed in the ER and 3 in the Golgi, with active sites facing the cytoplasm or the lumen. The various biosynthetic intermediates must therefore be shuttled within, across and between the bilayer of several different organelles.

The first and rate-limiting step of the sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway is conserved from yeast through humans (Fig. 1) to produce 3-ketosphinganine (3-KS) by condensation of serine and palmitoyl CoA at the cytosolic surface of the ER. The reaction is catalyzed by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT1, in mammals), comprising at least 3 subunits, SPTLC1, SPTLC2, and SPTLC3 [12, 13]. SPTLC3 exhibits 68% sequence similarity to SPTLC2 and has similar enzymatic activity, but a different tissue expression pattern. In most tissues the SPTLC2: SPTLC1 mRNA expression ratio remains relatively constant, whereas the ratio of SPTLC3:SPTLC1 varies from 2:1 in colon to 1500:1 in placenta. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast), an accessory protein encoded by the TSC3 gene likely acts as a regulatory component of the two-component SPT complex encoded by the LCB1 and LCB2 genes [14]. Whether the varied composition of the SPT complex in mammalian cells has regulatory consequences remains to be determined but is an intriguing possibility [15].

Reduction of 3-KS yields dihydrosphingosine, which is subsequently acylated to form dihydroceramide. Dihydroceramide is then desaturated to produce ceramide by a family of enzymes encoded by the longevity assurance genes (Lass), first identified in budding yeast [16]. In mammals, the Lass isoforms have unique tissue distributions that reflect the incorporation of a particular acyl CoA into dihydroceramide [15]. The production of ceramide is another key point in the pathway; ceramide serves as a precursor for complex sphingolipids and is itself a signaling molecule in various cellular processes, including the induction of apoptosis. Ceramide is subsequently transported to the Golgi where it meets with varying fates, as different head groups are added to produce different classes of complex sphingolipids [17].

Unlike cholesterol biosynthesis, regulation of de novo sphingolipid biosynthesis for the most part remains enigmatic; it does not appear to require a single class of master transcriptional regulators, or respond solely to cellular sphingolipid concentrations. Surprisingly, it has been shown that an increase of one or more sphingolipid does not reflect an increase in enzyme levels. This finding has been further corroborated by microarray analysis across a wide variety of conditions and cells, where transcriptional regulation was absent for key enzymes in the sphingolipid metabolic pathway [14]. The weight of evidence indicates substrate availability (i.e. serine and fatty acids) as a major determinant of flux through the sphingolipid pathway. SPT is sensitive to fluctuations of intracellular concentrations of these molecules [18]. A recent study in yeast showed that heat stress results in serine uptake from the media and transport to the ER, where it is utilized for de novo synthesis of ceramide. Sphingoid bases generated in this pathway mediate specific responses to heat stress including regulation of nutrient permeases, cytoskeletal changes, cell cycle arrest, and RNA translation [19]. Interestingly, depleting the medium of serine or inhibiting fatty acid synthesis prohibited de novo sphingolipid synthesis in response to heat shock [14].

2.3. Co-regulation of sterol and sphingolipid anabolic pathways

The metabolism of these lipid molecules is clearly co-regulated, as demonstrated by the striking impact of sphingolipid storage disorders on cholesterol synthesis. This coordination arises indirectly via the SREBP master regulator [20]. In sphingolipid storage disorders, excess sphingolipids in the lysosome sequester cholesterol away from the ER. Consequently, SREBP is activated, thus commencing a futile cycle of uptake and entrapment. Similarly, a decrease in cellular sphingomyelin via the administration of myriocin, results in a reduction in SREBP that, in turn, correlates with decreased plasma cholesterol and triglyceride [21]. By contrast, ceramide, unlike sphingomyelin has an inverse relationship with SREBP, in that elevated intracellular ceramide concentrations correlate with decreased SREBP activity, independent of cellular cholesterol status [21]. Ceramide also down-regulates cholesterol synthesis by promoting the phosphorylation and therefore inactivation of HMG CoA reductase.

In insects, the primary regulators of SREBP activity are derivatives of palmitate and the SPT pathway, particularly phosphatidylethanolamine [22]. Drosophila cells with mutations in SPT fail to elevate mSREBP or SRE-mediated gene transcription in response to sterol depletion; this is overcome if cells are supplemented with intermediates of sphingolipid synthesis. Similarly, inhibition of SPT or ceramide synthase in wild type insect cells blocks SRE mediated gene transcription independent of sterol levels. In a corollary experiment, cells provided with precursors, or intermediates of sphingolipid synthesis exhibited an increase in SREBP activity and SRE mediated gene transcription [23]. This correlation appears to be conserved; in budding yeast, sterol biosynthesis and sphingolipid hydroxylation are closely coordinated, although the mechanism is ambiguous [24].

3. Sterol and sphingolipid catabolism

Numerous, precisely regulated pathways have evolved to modify cholesterol and sphingolipids and thus protect cells from the aberrant accumulation of either molecule. In situations where these detoxification events go awry, for example in lysosomal storage disorders, the outcome is frequently lethal [25].

3.1. Esterification of sterols

The esterification and storage of free cholesterol as cytosolic lipid droplets represents a critical lipid detoxification reaction. Two distinct isoforms of acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyl-transferases (ACATs) catalyze the formation of cholesteryl ester (CE) from a long chain fatty acyl-CoA and free cholesterol. ACAT1 [26] and ACAT2 [27-29] are located primarily in the ER with a small portion of ACAT1 observed near the trans-Golgi network and the endocytosis recycling compartment [30]. In humans, ACAT1 is expressed in most tissues while ACAT2 is mainly expressed in intestine [31, 32]. The tissue distributions of murine ACATs are similar to the human enzymes except that ACAT2 is the major isoform in mouse liver [33]. Substrate availability (i.e. sterol) allosterically regulates the reaction, thus linking membrane status with detoxification. When esterification is awry, ER safeguards such as the unfolded protein response are initiated, although ultimately the cell succumbs to apoptosis [34].

3.2. Hydroxylation of cholesterol and synthesis of bile acids

Bile acid biosynthesis represents a key catabolic and non-reversible departure point of sterols from the animal cell. Approximately 50% of de novo synthesized cholesterol is converted to bile acids daily in the adult liver. Although approximately 20-30 grams of the bile acids synthesized are secreted into the intestine, 90% of the excreted bile acids are reabsorbed via active transport in the ileum and recycled back to the liver.

The synthesis of bile acids occurs primarily via a classical (neutral), liver specific pathway accounting for ∼75% of the bile acid pool [35]. When the liver is diseased, an alternative (acidic) pathway may predominate, whereby side-chain oxidation of cholesterol in extra-hepatic locations precedes steroid ring modification, yielding acidic intermediate metabolites. The two pathways are initiated by the formation of 7α-hydroxycholesterol or 27α-hydroxycholesterol respectively; the former catalyzed by cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (encoded by the CYP7A1 gene) and the latter by 27α-hydroxylase (encoded by CYP27A1). 7α-hydroxycholesterol and 27α-hydroxycholesterol undergo further modification (including alteration of the sterol ring, oxidation, shortening of the side chain, and ultimately conjugation) to produce the most abundant primary bile acids in humans, cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid. Prior to transport out of the hepatocytes, most bile acids are conjugated to either taurine (in the mouse) or glycine (in humans), thereby increasing water solubility and preventing passive re-absorption once secreted into the small intestine. These conjugated bile acids are then carried from the liver via the bile ducts to the gallbladder, where they are stored for future use. Ultimately, they are secreted into the intestine, where they emulsify dietary lipids. In the gut the glycine or taurine residues are removed and the bile acids are either excreted (a small fraction) or reabsorbed by the gut and returned to the liver.

These pathways generate a vast array of bile acids, whose functions vary from solubilization and absorption of a broad range of lipophilic molecules in the intestine to intracellular signaling. Bile acids are potent signaling molecules, acting as ligands for G protein coupled receptors (specifically TGR5) and nuclear hormone receptors (e.g. the farnesoid × receptor; FXR). Consequently, bile acids exert regulatory effects on many lipid homeostatic processes, including their own synthesis and enterohepatic recirculation as well as triglyceride, cholesterol, and glucose metabolism.

3.3. Sphingolipid hydrolysis

Catabolism of sphingolipids serves to prevent accumulation, but importantly generates and recycles intermediates and metabolites such as sphingosine (and thus sphingosine-1-phosphate) and ceramide. These are potent signaling molecules that mediate a variety of cellular processes including differentiation and apoptosis, and as such their levels are closely monitored and controlled.

Sphingomyelinases (SMases) mediate the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to ceramide and phosphocholine. This family of hydrolases is classified into three groups according to pH optimum (alkaline, acid, and neutral) and then further sub-categorized according to their primary structure, localization, and cation dependence [36]. The acid SMase (A-SMase) was the first member of this enzyme family to be characterized. It consists of two spatially and functionally distinct isoforms, secretory and lysosomal, which are both encoded by the Smpd1 gene. Although both forms require zinc for their activity, the lysosomal form is tightly bound to zinc and the secretory form requires exogenous zinc [36].

Acid Sphingomyelinases play a pivotal role in the cellular stress response. A-SMase knockout mice have impaired ceramide generation and are protected from a variety of stress stimuli, including Fas ligand, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and photo-cytotoxicity. Although these genetic models have been instrumental in suggesting the overall molecular function of A-SMase, they do not identify the individual roles of the isoforms. Although both isoforms share a common precursor and function, they likely hydrolyze distinct pools of sphingomyelin [37].

Lysosomal A-SMase localizes to the lumen of endosomes, phagosomes and lysosomes as well as to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. Stress conditions cause the lysosomal A-SMase to translocate from its intracellular location to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, which is rich in sphingomyelin. The hydrolysis of sphingomyelin at the plasma membrane results in a relatively slow reorganization of membranes and the formation of ceramide enriched microdomains. Although this acute activation and relocation of lysosomal A-SMase in response to cellular stress has been seen in many cell types, the precise relationship between A-SMase, SM hydrolysis to ceramide at the PM, and lipid rafts has yet to be elucidated [37].

The secretory A-SMase hydrolyzes lipoprotein-bound sphingomyelin forming a ceramide -enriched low-density lipoprotein with an increased propensity for aggregation. Aggregation of these atherogenic lipoproteins promotes their subendothelial retention and engulfment by arterial wall macrophages that over time become macrophage foam cells. Mice lacking A-SMase in an atherosclerosis-prone genetic background had no change in serum cholesterol or circulating LDL, relative to control mice, but showed decreased focal atheroma formation [37].

Neutral sphingomyelinases (N-SMases) have an optimum pH of 7.4 and require Mg2+ ions for activity. Two mammalian isoforms, N-SMase1 and N-SMase2, exhibit significant sequence conservation with the catalytic region of bacterial and yeast N-SMases suggesting a common catalytic mechanism [38]. Interestingly, although N-SMase1 displays sphingomyelinase activity in vitro, nSMase1 knockout mice showed no lipid storage disease or abnormalities in SM metabolism. Furthermore, cells overexpressing N-SMase1 did not exhibit any marked changes in sphingomyelin metabolism, but surprisingly showed an increase in the metabolism of 1-O-alkyl-lyso-phosphatidylcholine (lyso-platelet activating factor). The ambiguity of the in vivo role of N-SMase1 was further complicated by its localization to the ER, which is suboptimal for a protein involved in SM hydrolysis [38].

By contrast, cells over-expressing N-SMase2 displayed lower SM and higher ceramide levels, suggesting a more conventional role for this isoform in sphingolipid metabolism. Further analysis of ceramide composition in such cells showed that the enzyme primarily increased levels of very long chain ceramides, which correlated with a decrease in the level of C24:0- and C24:1-SM species. Importantly, down-regulation of N-SMase2 using siRNA prevented confluence-induced increases in levels of C24:0 and C24:1 ceramides. N-SMase2 is activated by anionic phospholipids, especially phosphatidylserine, cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol, suggesting the presence of an anionic phospholipid binding domain, similar to yeast N-SMAses such as Isc1p [38].

Alkaline SMase (alk-SMase) exhibits an optimum pH of 8.5 and shares 30% sequence similarity with members of the nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (NPP) family of ecto-enzymes [39]. Alk-SMase localizes to endosome-like structures near the plasma membrane of the intestinal tract, in particular the duodenum and colon, where its activity is low, and in the jejunum, where its activity is high. The mid jejunum is the primary site of dietary SM hydrolysis. For optimum activity, alk-SMase requires bile salts with maximal activation at the critical micelle concentrations of each bile salt. Although all bile salts have a stimulatory effect, the degree of activation varies greatly among bile salt species. Taurocholate (TC) and taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDC) exhibit a 20-fold more potent effect on alk-SMAse than other bile salts [39].

3.4. Coordinated catabolism of sterols and sphingolipids

The mechanism by which sphingolipid and cholesterol catabolism are co-regulated is virtually unknown, although it is clear that perturbing the homeostasis of either lipid has profound effects on the other's metabolism. For example, sphingolipid hydrolysis has been shown to impact cholesterol metabolism, specifically the synthesis and uptake of CE. Incubation of cells with a bacterial SMase markedly increased cholesterol esterification without expanding cellular cholesterol pools [40]. Interestingly, sphingosine derived from ceramide has been shown to inhibit cholesterol esterification by ACAT [41].

Sphingomyelin has also been shown to inhibit the uptake of CE from HDL via scavenger receptor class B type 1. Incorporation of SM into recombinant high density lipoprotein (rHDL) that contain labeled CE resulted in approximately 50% inhibition of the selective uptake of CE in SR-BI-transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, hepatocytes (HepG2), and adrenocortical cells (Y1BS1). This inhibition was completely reversed by treatment of rHDL with SMase [41].

4. Subcellular Lipid Transport

Lipid movement between organelles is a major component of eukaryotic membrane homeostasis. The PM contains most of the cellular sterols and sphingolipids while the ER is sterol/sphingolipid poor despite being the primary site of their biosynthesis. Transport of these lipids is not random as the cell maintains a precise allocation that is essential for cell viability. As such multiple vesicular and non-vesicular transport pathways have evolved to move these lipids throughout the cell (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Cholesterol and sphingolipid homeostasis in mammalian cells.

Figure 2

Cholesterol (panel A) is synthesized, esterified into cholesteryl ester (CE) and deposited in lipid droplets at the ER. Cholesterol can be mobilized back into free (FC) pool by ester hydrolysis. Cells take up cholesterol by LDL-receptor mediated LDL uptake or through diffusion of FC from lipoproteins to plasma membrane. Excess FC can be removed by efflux through passive diffusion from plasma membrane to acceptors or ABCA1 mediated FC transfer to apo AI. Beside these common pathways, there are also cell type specific pathways to handle cholesterol. In hepatocytes and enterocytes, cholesterol can be packaged into lipoproteins and secreted into the circulation. Cholesterol is also converted into steroid hormones or bile acids by steroidogenic cells or hepatocytes, respectively. Panel B depicts the cellular location of key components of sphingolipid synthesis, maturation and hydrolysis. Both lipid classes activate and/or respond to transcriptional regulation via SREBP which itself must be translocated from the ER (triangle; precursor) to the Golgi (square; mature) in response to lipids to be activated and subsequently imported into the nucleus.

4.1 Sterol transport

The cholesterol pool of the plasma membrane is mobile and continually recycles with intracellular pools (Fig. 2A). Nascent cholesterol is rapidly transported to the PM by an ATP-dependent mechanism [42] that is only partially accounted for by the protein secretion pathway, as treatment with Brefeldin A to collapse the Golgi does not abrogate movement. Similarly, vesicular and non-vesicular pathways are involved in the retrograde transport of cholesterol. Pharmacological reagents that disrupt the cytoskeleton, acidic compartments, and intermediate filaments of cells inhibit cholesterol movement from PM to ER, consistent with the involvement of vesicular pathways [42]. However, energy depletion only modestly affects the movement of cholesterol from the PM [43] indicating a significant non-vesicular component. Membrane juxtapositions may be sufficient for diffusion or protein-mediated transport, however the molecular mechanisms of these processes remain obscure.

In the search for subcellular cholesterol carriers, several candidates have been presented. The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) is clearly required to deliver cholesterol to the inner membrane of mitochondria for steroid hormone production [44]. Mutations in human StAR gene cause congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia, which is characterized by defective steroid synthesis in newborns. Sixteen human proteins have been identified that possess a lipid-binding domain in common with StAR, the StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain [45, 46]. One family member, MLN64, is a membrane protein localized to late endosomes consistent with a role in cholesterol mobilization in this organelle. Indeed, expression of a truncated form of MLN64 lacking the START domain led to cholesterol accumulation in lysosomes [47]. Another member of this family, StarD4 responds to cellular cholesterol levels via SREBP mediated transcription [48] and thus is also a candidate cholesterol transfer protein.

Caveolins, were first identified as coat proteins found in specific plasma membrane invaginations. Subsequently they were also found in the Golgi, the ER, vesicles, the surface of lipid droplets, and in the cytosol [49-51]. Three caveolin family members (Caveolin-1, -2 and −3) have been characterized, one of which (Caveolin-1) binds to cholesterol [52] and mediates bidirectional vesicular and non-vesicular cholesterol transport from ER to PM [53, 54]. Over-expression of Caveolin-1 leads to increased transfer of intracellular cholesterol to PM, increased efflux to HDL, and up-regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis. However, the role of caveolins in intracellular cholesterol trafficking is clearly dispensable, since they are not expressed in all cell types.

Sterol carrier protein 2 (SCP-2) is a non-specific lipid transfer protein that binds to cholesterol, fatty acids, fatty acyl-CoA, and phospholipids in vitro and is localized to cytosol, peroxisomes, mitochondria and ER. Its diverse localization suggests a general role in lipid movement between a variety of organelles. SCP-2 selectively enhances cholesterol transfer from caveolae/lipid rafts and facilitates retention of cholesterol in many cultured cell systems [55, 56]. Consistent with a general role in lipid transfer, the targeted deletion of the SCP2 gene in mice resulted in defective peroxisomal β-oxidation of fatty acids [57], as well as impaired biliary cholesterol secretion when the animals received a cholesterol enriched lithogenic diet [58].

4.2 Sphingolipid transport

The synthesis of SM and complex sphingolipids begins at the cytosolic surface of the ER and is completed at the trans-Golgi, suggesting the presence of an ER to Golgi transport mechanism (Fig. 2B). Genetic complementation of a mutant CHO cell line that was defective in SM metabolism identified ceramide transfer protein (CERT) as essential for the transport of ceramide from the ER to the Golgi complex. Analysis of CERT revealed a Golgi-associating pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, an ER-targeting FFAT motif (two phenylalanines in an acidic tract) followed by a START family domain that in this case specifically bound ceramide.

Interestingly, the down-regulation of CERT in various cell lines had no effect on the synthesis of complex glycosphingolipids (GSLs). As such, it was believed that the generation of GSLs from glucosylceramide (GlcCer) occurred independent of a transfer protein. In actuality, GlcCer enters both a retrograde and anterograde transport pathway, mediated by the four-phosphate adaptor protein, FAPP2, a protein that binds to phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PtdIns4P) and ARF1 (via its PH domain) [59, 60]. FAPP2 is now recognized as an essential component of the GSL synthetic machinery. It mediates non-vesicular transport of the common GSL precursor GlcCer from its site of synthesis at the early Golgi to post Golgi compartments, and the surface of the cell. Counter-intuitively, GlcCer is also transferred by FAPP2 back to the ER, where it re-enters the vesicular transport pathways for movement from ER to Golgi where most of the enzymes involved in complex GSLs assembly are located. This circuitous route may actually confer regulation upon the transport process by linking GlcCer to Arf1 and the signaling lipid, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate.

4.3. Mutual transport of sterols and sphingolipids

Sterol and sphingolipid homeostasis is strikingly conserved throughout evolution. In some cases, the major players (Tables 1 and 2) are shared between these classes of lipids to the extent that they may even be co-transported (Fig. 2A and B). This provides the means for significant cross talk between these pathways and likely represents a key regulatory event in the homeostasis of multiple lipid classes.

Table 1.

Subcellular lipid transporters, putative and proven. Members of the ATP-binding Cassette family of membrane transporters are the topic of Table 2.

Transporter Protein Family Lipid Transported Disease State Reference
NPC1 NPC C, Oxysterols NPC Type 1 [121, 122]
NPC2 Der p 2 C NPC Type 2 [122, 123]
NPC1L1 NPC C, SM Resistance to dietary induced hypercholesterolemia [124]
CERT START/ORP Cer ? [125]
FAPP2 PtdIns4P, GlcCer ? [60]
SCP2 C, PL, FA ? [126]
MLN64 START C ? [47]
OSBP START/ORP Oxysterols ? [68]
StarD4 START C ? [48]
StAR START C Congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia [127]
ARV1 C, Cer ? [73, 74]
Caveolin-1 Caveolin C [52]

Abbreviations:; C, cholesterol; SM, sphingomyelin; Cer, ceramide; PL, phospholipid;; PtdIns4P, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate; GlcCer, glucosylceramide; FA, fatty acids; Der p 2,; START,; ORP,

Table 2.

Members of the ATP binding cassette super-family of membrane associated transporters involved in lipid movement. Abbreviations; C, cholesterol; Cer, ceramide; PL, phospholipids; PC, phosphatidylcholine; SM, sphingomyelin; GSL, glycosphingolipid; E ergosterol; Ret, retinaldehyde; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; FA, fatty acids.

Transporter gene Function Lipids transported Disease state/mutant phenotype Ref.
ABCA1 Apo-A1 dependent formation of nascent HDL C, PL Tangiers Disease Familial HDL Deficiency [79]
ABCA2 Unknown, correlated with C concentration in brain SM, myelin Alzheimer's Disease (putative) [79, 128]
ABCA3 Secerete pulmonary surfactant C, SM, PC Neonatal surfactant deficiency, Pediatric interstitial lung disease [79]
ABCA4 (ABCR) Retinal integrity Ret, PE Age-related macular degeneration, Stargardt disease 1, Retinitis pigmentosa 19, [79]
ABCA6 Unknown, sterol regulated ? [129]
ABCA7 Unknown C, PL ? [130]
ABCA9 Unknown, sterol regulated ? [130, 131]
ABCA10 Unknown, sterol regulated ? [130, 131]
ABCA12 Maintains the integrity of lamellar granules C, Cer, FA Lamellar ichthyosis type 2 Harlequin ichthyosis [79]
ABCB1 (MDR1) Multiple drug efflux (indirect effect on C) PL, SM, GSL Parkinsons [128]
ABCB4 & ABCB11 Phosphatidlycholine Translocator PC Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis [128]
ABCG1 Promote cholesterol efflux to HDL-2 & HDL-3 particles C, SM Atherosclerosis [132]
ABCG4 Promote cholesterol efflux to HDL-2 & HDL-3 particles C Atherosclerosis [132]
ABCG5 & ABCG8 Secretion of plant sterols and cholesterol into bile C, sitosterol Sitosterolemia [132]
AUS1, PDR11 Influx of sterol during anaerobiosis in yeast Ergosterol? Anaerobic inviability [80]

4.3.1 Oxysterol binding proteins

Oxysterol binding protein (OSBP) and OSBP-related proteins (ORPs; characterized by an OSBP-related domain ORD) constitute a large conserved family of proteins (twelve human ORP family members, seven yeast OSBP homologue (OSHs) [61, 62]). Besides the core ORD, many ORPs also contain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains, transmembrane regions, ER-targeting FFAT motifs, GOLD (Golgi dynamics) domains and ankyrin repeats [63]. Structural studies and in vitro binding assays have shown that OSBPs, such as Osh4p can bind and transport oxysterols, cholesterol, and ergosterol [64].

In addition to their role as sterol carriers, OSBPs may mediate cross-talk between sphingolipids and cholesterol. Activation and translocation of OSBP via oxysterols has been shown to recruit CERT into an active transport pathway from the ER to the Golgi, thereby promoting sphingomyelin synthesis. Ridgway et al. stimulated SM synthesis threefold in CHO-K1 cells by treating with 25 hydroxycholesterol, an event augmented by the overexpression of OSBP [65] and inhibited by the expression of a mutant OSBP retained in the ER [66].

Functional studies of OSBP have revealed that the associations of OSBP with a resident ER protein VAP (vesicle associated membrane protein-associated protein) and with Ptdlns-4-P at the Golgi are both required for CERT recruitment to the Golgi and subsequent SM synthesis. Furthermore, the Golgi localization of CERT in the absence of OSBP-VAP interactions is insufficient to increase SM synthesis and thus ceramide and SM synthesis are reduced in cells with OSBP or CERT knockdowns treated with 25OH-cholesterol [67].

Conversely at the Golgi, it is not the shared interaction of OSBP and CERT with Ptdlns-4-P, but the sequential binding of these two transporters that enhance SM synthesis. It has been suggested that recruitment of ARF1 by the PH domain of OSBP at the Golgi could stimulate PtdIns-4-k-IIIβ and subsequent increased PtdIns-4-P synthesis for recruitment of CERT. Collectively these data suggests a mechanism for integrating cholesterol and SM metabolism mediated by OSBP and CERT [68]. Interestingly, CERT was originally identified based on hypersensitivity of LY-A cells to the cholesterol-absorbing agent methyl-β-cyclodextrin [69].

4.3.2. ARV1, a transporter of sterols and sphingolipids

The ACAT-related enzymes (ARE1 and ARE2) of budding yeast are 49 percent identical to each other and exhibit 23 percent identity to human ACAT1 [70, 71]. Deletion of ARE1 and ARE2 produces a viable yeast cell with no detectable esterification activity [72]. The deletion of ARV1 (ARE2 Required for Viability 1) in this context is inviable, probably due to accumulation of unesterified sterols in ER at the expense of plasma membrane sterol pools [73]. Mutations in ARV1 were also independently isolated in a genetic screen for mutants defective in sphingolipid biosynthesis, suggesting a more general role for this protein in lipid transport [74]. Lower steady state levels of complex sphingolipids, with an accumulation of hydroxylated ceramides were indicative of a defect in ceramide export from the ER in arv1Δ mutant cells [74]. The coordinated regulation of sterols with other lipids makes it difficult to distinguish whether these defects are secondary to sterol transport defects or reflect the Arv1-mediated transport of multiple lipid species besides sterols. To add to the confusion of what are secondary versus primary activities of this protein, Arv1p is also required for the maturation of GPI-anchored proteins in the ER [75].

4.3.3. Lipid flux through membranes by ATP-binding cassette transporters

ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters (a superfamily of 48 integral membrane proteins in humans and 31 in yeast) harness the energy of ATP hydrolysis to transport a diverse set of hydrophobic molecules across membranes. ABC transporters are typically composed of two nucleotide binding domains and two transmembrane domains. The nucleotide binding domains contain characteristic motifs (Walker A and Walker B) and the ABC linker region, which are the hallmarks of this protein superfamily.

To date, approximately 20 members of this protein superfamily have been implicated in lipid transport (Table 2). Mutations in ABCA1 are the underlying molecular defect in Tangier disease, highlighting its role as a key regulator of HDL metabolism and cholesterol flux. ABCA1 function and regulation is not restricted to cholesterol, but extends to phospholipids and sphingolipids as well. ABCA1 was found to translocate phospholipids and expression levels were impacted by several sphingolipids. For example, an increase in intracellular concentration of ceramide enhanced expression of ABCA1 while increased cellular GSL levels promoted cholesterol accumulation by impairing ABCA1 function. This was further substantiated by the observation that fibroblasts derived from patients with genetic GSL storage diseases (Fabry disease, Sandhoff disease, and GM1 gangliosidosis) had impaired apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux [76].

Genetic and functional assays have revealed the seminal role that ABCA1 and its relatives play in lipid metabolism. These transporters are pivotal members of the cellular cholesterol, phospholipid, and sphingolipid transport machinery. Other members of this subclass to have been implicated in lipid transport include ABCA3 (required for the transfer of phospholipids into the lamellar body, a prerequisite for alveolar type 2 cell surfactant production [77]), ABCA4 (a retinylidene-phosphatidylethanolamine transporter in the photoreceptor cells of the retina [78]), and ABCA12 (involved in the keratinocyte lipid export system [79]).

Several members of the ABC-G subclass of half transporters (comprised of one nucleotide binding domain and one transmembrane domain) have also been implicated in sterol transport across the plasma membrane. In some yeast species, ABC-G family members such as AUS1 encode proteins essential for sterol uptake and anaerobic growth, a state that induces sterol and fatty acid auxotrophy [80]. In mammals, the majority of this sub-family is required for sterol efflux. Two tandemly aligned genes, ABCG5 and ABCG8, encode proteins that promote sterol efflux into bile and the intestinal lumen and act as obligate partners in the transport reaction [81]. ABCG1 also mediates sterol efflux to HDL particles and is also the first member of this superfamily to transport sphingomyelin. ABCG1 effluxes several species of sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine [82]. Furthermore, overexpression of CERT in CHO-K1 cells produced an increased efflux of cholesterol and SM mediated by ABCG1 [83].

4.3.4. Lipid transport in endosomes and lysosomes

Subcellular pools of sterols and sphingolipids arise from the convergence of endogenous and exogenous sources. In cells lacking the genes defective in Niemann Pick type C (NP-C) disease, exogenous sterols and PM sphingolipids accumulate in the lysosome, while the circuits traveled by ER-derived lipids are unaffected. The former process is likely an ancient one; the NPC1 gene is impressively well conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution [84]. Strikingly, expression of the yeast NP-C-related gene 1 (NCR1), a sequence ortholog of human NPC1, fully restores lipid transport to CHO NPC1 mutant cells [85].

The NPC1 gene product, a protein with a sterol-sensing domain and 13 transmembrane domains, facilitates export of free cholesterol from late endosomes and lysosomes either by direct binding of cholesterol as demonstrated for a soluble sub-domain of NPC1 or alternatively by transport not of cholesterol but some other accompanying hydrophobic molecule [86-88]. NPC1 could be involved in sphingolipid transport with concomitant cholesterol movement because of the high affinity between these molecules [85]. Mutations in the NPC2 gene also cause NP-C disease, due to defects in a soluble lysosomal protein with clear cholesterol binding capability [89]. The precise role of NPC2 in sterol and sphingolipid homeostasis is unknown. However, NPC2 is also an ancient protein; expression of the yeast ortholog of the human NPC2, also suppresses lesions in human NPC2 mutant fibroblasts [90]. NPC1 and NPC2 double knockout mice have the same phenotype as single NPC1 or NPC2 null mice [91] suggesting the proteins work cooperatively in the same pathway. Surprisingly, sterol binding by NPC1 is accomplished by an NH2-terminal “soluble” domain of the protein, unique to this gene family [92]. Subsequently, crystal structures of both apo- and ligand-associated forms of this domain [93] and of NPC2 [94] were resolved and prompted a model of cholesterol transfer in this compartment of the cell. The proposed transfer model rests upon the manner in which cholesterol is oppositely orientated in NPC 2 versus NPC1(NTD), such that the 3β-hydroxyl is buried and isooctyl side chain exposed in the latter molecule and vice –versa in NPC2.

NPC1L1, a mammalian paralog of NPC1 [95], has been implicated in cholesterol absorption by several criteria. Unlike the NPC1 gene, expression of NPC1L1 is more restricted; transcripts are most abundant in the liver and intestine. NPC1L1-null mice are resistant to diet-induced hypercholesterolemia [96-98] and to the effect of ezetimide on cholesterol absorption in the intestine, prompting the hypothesis that NPC1L1 is the target of this sterol absorption inhibitor [99, 100]. As for NPC1, the precise substrate for NPC1L1 is uncertain, in that sphingolipids and cholesterol accumulate in NPC1L1 deficient cells [97].

5. Sterol and sphingolipid pathobiology

5.1. Lysosomal lipid storage disorders

Lysosomal lipid storage disorders arise from a panoply of gene defects resulting in accumulation of sterols and/or sphingolipids (see [101] for review). Indeed, there are few if any instances where the trafficking of these molecules can be disassociated [102]. Of particular relevance to this review are the Niemann-Pick diseases; these are autosomal recessive metabolic disorders that are typified by the accumulation of cholesterol and sphingolipids in various organs including the spleen, liver, and brain. Niemann Pick Type A and B are both caused by mutations in SMPD1, which result in dysfunctional A-SMase activity. As a result, cellular sphingomyelin levels are elevated by approximately 70%. Although types A and B both stem from the same enzymatic deficiency, they exhibit contrasting clinical symptoms and prognoses. Niemann Pick Type A patients typically present within the first 6 months of life with enlarged livers and spleens and progressive neurodegeneration that ultimately leads to death within 3 years. Conversely, Niemann Pick Type B patients have little or no neurodegeneration and frequently survive into adulthood.

Homozygous A-SMase knockout mouse models also display progressive lipid (sphingomyelin along with ganglioside and cholesterol) storage in reticuloendothelial organs and the brain. Macrophages derived from A-SMase knockout mice showed a significant decrease in cholesterol efflux (approximately 60-70 %) and cholesteryl ester (30-50%) formation. Furthermore, aberrant cholesterol trafficking was evident as filipin staining showed bright perinuclear staining, some of which coincided with late endosomes/lysosomes.

Niemann Pick Type B patients also exhibit decreased HDL-C levels, despite normal phospholipids and cholesterol efflux to the mature HDL particle. Previous studies had established that sphingomyelin inhibits the unfolding of ApoA-I in discoidal and spherical reconstituted HDL and impairs the LCAT reaction. Lee et al. observed that both nascent HDL particles and mature HDL particles isolated from NP-B patient plasma had a significant increase (∼50–100%) in sphingomyelin content and a decrease in LCAT-mediated cholesterol esterification.

Niemann-Pick type C patients exhibit progressive central nervous system degeneration and visceral storage of cholesterol, sphingomyelin, and glycosphingolipids. Typical NPC patients show symptoms at early ages and live only into teenage years. The disease arises from mutations in the NPC1 or NPC2 gene [86], which direct the traffic of LDL derived cholesterol from late endosomes and lysosomes to the ER and the PM [103]. Heterozygous deficiency of NPC1 selectively blocks cholesterol trafficking to the ER and protects macrophages from cholesterol-induced apoptosis [104]. In mouse models, NPC1 heterozygosity confers resistance to lesional necrosis in atherosclerosis [104]. There is a significant discrepancy in this syndrome between action of the protein and loss of function- phenotype. In budding yeast for example, where the function of the orthologous genes have clearly been conserved, there is no growth defect in the null mutants. In mammalian cells the identity of the NPC1 substrate remains contentious, perhaps unknown. Moreover, it is not clear how lipid accumulation in the lysosome causes neuronal demise, especially in the cerebellum.

5.2. Atherosclerotic vascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Western societies. Many risk factors for atherosclerosis have been identified, some of which are reversible, including hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and high plasma homocysteine concentration. Most prominent amongst these is an elevated level of plasma cholesterol. Serum LDL elevation and modification, such as oxidation, glycation, and aldehyde-conjugation confers unregulated uptake through scavenger receptors (mainly SR-AI/II and CD36). Consequently, cholesteryl esters accumulate to form macrophage-derived foam cells, the hallmark of the fatty streak. In the later stages of atherosclerosis, foam cells accumulate free cholesterol possibly due to compromised free cholesterol efflux and ACAT1 activity. Foam cells then undergo FC-induced apoptosis or necrosis and release their lipid contents [105]. The accumulation of extracellular lipids, cell debris and a mixture of leukocytes may form a necrotic core of atherosclerotic plaque. At the advanced stage, plaques rupture and as a result, many thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis occur. Plaque rupture and thrombosis are responsible for approximately 50% of cases of acute coronary syndromes and myocardial infarction [106].

The reduction of plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations lowers the risk of heart attacks, strokes and all forms of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Currently, the most commonly used cholesterol lowing drugs are ‘statins’ which are potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase and thus cholesterol biosynthesis. Decreased cholesterol biosynthesis is associated with the upregulation of LDLR due to activation of the SREBP pathways and thus elevated clearance of LDL from plasma. Decreasing dietary cholesterol and biliary cholesterol is another approach to manipulating body cholesterol. The inverse correlation between HDL and atherosclerosis suggest that HDL is athero-protective. HDL can protect macrophages from FC-induced cell death by reverse cholesterol transport but has been recalcitrant to therapeutic intervention.

Recent observations have shown that plasma sphingomyelin levels are also independent risk factors for coronary heart disease. The inhibition or deletion of SPT significantly decreases atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein E knockout mice and inhibits cholesterol absorption [107, 108]. Furthermore, inhibition of sphingolipid synthesis lowers plasma cholesterol and triglyceride mass by modulating SREBP-1. Concurrently, inhibition of sphingolipid synthesis also induced expression of apolipoprotein A1 and LCAT proteins to promote increased plasma concentrations of anti-atherogenic HDL. The beneficial effect exerted by inhibition of sphingolipid synthesis was morphologically reflected in a decreased formation of atherosclerotic lesions and macrophage accumulation. In contrast, increased sphingolipid synthesis correlates with increased atherogenic potential. Hepatic over-expression of sphingomyelin synthase in wild-type mice shifts plasma cholesterol and sphingomyelin concentration to the pro-atherogenic non-HDL lipoproteins [21].

Dietary SM significantly decreases cholesterol absorption in the intestine; the maximal inhibition occurs at an equal molar amount of SM and cholesterol. Sphingosine, a product of SM hydrolysis, may be responsible for this phenomenon, as it can form condensed lipid complexes with the α-face of cholesterol. Furthermore, this inhibition may occur via a NPC1L1-dependent transport of micellar cholesterol since the inhibitory effect of sphingosine on cholesterol absorption was far more pronounced in NPC1L1 expressing Caco-2 cells [39].

5.3. Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a polygenic neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized pathologically by amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal cell loss. One of the strongest known risk factors for sporadic AD is the status of apolipoprotein E (ApoE), the major carrier of cholesterol in the CNS. Individuals carrying one or two copies of the ApoE ε4 allele have a higher risk of developing the disease, compared to those carrying ε3 (the most common) or ε2 (which appears to be protective) alleles. Lipids not only serve as a risk factor for AD but also play an essential role in modulating the disease [109, 110]. Data from both in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that there is a linear relationship between intracellular cholesterol levels and the production of Aβ peptides [111].

Recent research suggests that Aβ generation and the maintenance of lipid homeostasis are intrinsically linked as alterations in cellular lipid levels, trafficking, or organization in the protein–lipid bilayer have been associated with Aβ production. Specifically, the conservation of lipid rafts appears to be integral to the formation of Aβ peptides, since several of the proteins essential for Aβ generation, including the γ-secretase complex, β-secretase, and the β amyloid precursor protein (β-APP) are localized in a raft-cholesterol dependent manner [112]. Furthermore, β-APP exists in two pools, one associated with membrane rafts in which β-cleavage occurs and another outside of membrane rafts where α-cleavage (nonpathogenic) occurs, suggesting that raft localization favors the generation of the former [113]. These data suggest that the raft or non-raft membrane distribution of β-APP may in part determine its processing fate [110].

Cholesterol may not be the only culpable lipid in AD; defects in sphingolipid metabolism may also contribute to the generation of some of the pathological and clinical hallmarks. Microarray analysis of 17 brain regions from subjects with varying severity of AD revealed anomalous expression of various key enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism [114]. Early in disease progression (marked by mild dementia), enzymes that regulate de novo synthesis of ceramide were upregulated, whereas those enzymes regulating glycosphingolipid synthesis were down-regulated. Concomitantly, as expected, there was a significant increase in ceramide content during the early stages of AD. However, ceramide content eventually declines as cognitive impairment increases. Interestingly, during the period of advanced cognitive impairment there were changes in the expression of genes regulating ceramide catabolism [114]. Complex sphingolipids and derivatives of ceramide such as GM1 gangliosides have also been implicated in this syndrome [115].

5.4. Huntington's disease

Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive and fatal neurological disorder that presents at midlife and is characterized by motor, psychiatric, and cognitive dysfunction. HD is caused by an expanded CAG repeat in the gene encoding the protein huntingtin, however the mechanism by which this mutation contributes to neurodegeneration remains elusive. Defects in lipid homeostasis likely contribute to the onset of HD [116]; microarray analysis of a transgenic mouse model of HD (the R6/2 mice) showed decreased levels of mRNA of SRE regulated genes such as HMG-CoA reductase, Cyp51, and 7 dehydroxycholesterol reductase just prior to the onset of motor symptoms [117]. Furthermore, total cholesterol content and the ability to synthesize cholesterol was markedly reduced when human fibroblasts derived from HD patients were cultured in lipoprotein deficient serum [118]. Enzymatic analysis of brains from HD mice were shown to have reduced total sterol mass (including free and esterified cholesterol). In addition, HD cells exhibited a decrease in SREBP nuclear translocation and activity.

In keeping with the theme of this review, defects in cholesterol metabolism in various models of HD are also accompanied by abnormal sphingolipid metabolism. Microarray data from the R6/2 mouse model of HD and from postmortem human caudate samples of HD patients, revealed a decrease in expression of the genes involved in glycosphingolipid synthesis, relative to disease-free controls. Specifically, there was a decreased accumulation of transcripts for glycosyl- and sialyl-transferases, the enzymes contributing to ganglioside synthesis [119].

6. Conclusions and perspectives

It is virtually impossible to separate the relevance of sterols and sphingolipid, both to cellular metabolism and human disease. This is, of course, not happenstance; evolution has perfected membranes of cells to be adaptive, and this can be readily achieved by modulating the sphingolipid:sterol ratio. Our mission in this survey was to highlight the striking physical, genetic and metabolic interactions of sterols with sphingolipids (Figs. 1 and 2). Somewhat surprisingly, there is no single master regulator; instead it is the cross-talk between the pathways that apparently optimizes the lipid proportions. As such, there are numerous points of intervention where genetic variation in such interactions may impact several lipidoses and future therapies will ideally accommodate the roles of both molecules in the pathways in question. For example, there are a significant number of NP-C disease kindreds in which disparate cholesterol and sphingolipid phenotypes occur between siblings, with variable age of onset and rate of progression [120]. This observation strongly suggests segregation of modifier alleles in such families. We believe many of these pathways have already been identified in genome-wide panning of yeast genetic and physical interactions. For example, in an unbiased survey of all known sterol and sphingolipid genes in yeast, we asked what genetic data indicates a sterol-sphingolipid interaction. The result is clear (Fig. 3), these pathways can be readily represented as a web of interactions, further exemplifying the manner in which variation in one component of either pathway will likely have feed-forward and feed-backward sequelae that are initially homeostatic but perhaps ultimately incompatible with life. The identification of these genes and their biochemical consequences might ultimately lead to new therapeutic interventions in many disorders, ranging from atherosclerosis to Alzheimer's disease.

Figure 3. Genetic and physical interactions within the sterol and sphingolipid metabolome.

Figure 3

OSPREY v1.2 (http://biodata.mshri.on.ca/osprey) was used to generate interaction maps from data inventoried in the BioGRID (www.thebiogrid.org) between yeast genes with known roles in sterol metabolism and sphingolipid metabolism (sterol metabolism, n = 35; sphingolipid metabolism, n = 26; sterol and sphingolipid metabolism, n = 1, Saccharomyces Genome Database, www.yeastgenome.org). 18 sterol and 12 sphingolipid metabolism genes interact with at least one gene of the other metabolic class. Only interacting genes are shown in this figure.

Acknowledgments

The authors' research has been supported by the American Heart Association, the American Diabetes Association, the Ara Parseghian Medical Research Foundation, the Hirschl/Weil-Caulier Trust, the DART foundation, and NIH (DK54320). SG was supported with a NIH Predoctoral Fellowship (T32 DK07328); ABM was supported as a Charles H. Revson Senior Fellow in the Biomedical Science Program and by the Postdoctoral Training Program in Atherosclerosis (T32 HL07343); LW was supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

Abbreviations Used

ACAT

AcylCoA cholesterol acyltransferase

AD

Alzheimer's disease

ABC

ATP binding cassette

CERT

Ceramide Transport protein

CE

Cholesteryl ester

ER

Endoplasmic reticulum

FAPP2

Four-phosphate Adaptor Protein

GSLs

glycosphingolipids

HD

Huntington's disease

NP-C

Niemann Pick Type C

PM

Plasma membrane

SPT

serine palmitoyl transferase

SMase

Sphingomyelinase

A-SMase

Acid Sphingomyelinase

N-SMase

Neutral Sphingomyelinase

Alk--SMase

Alkaline Sphingomyelinase

SREBP

Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Sengupta P, Hammond A, Holowka D, Baird B. Structural determinants for partitioning of lipids and proteins between coexisting fluid phases in giant plasma membrane vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sengupta P, Baird B, Holowka D. Lipid rafts, fluid/fluid phase separation, and their relevance to plasma membrane structure and function. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:583–90. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mukherjee S, Maxfield FR. Membrane domains. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2004;20:839–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.095451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lingwood D, Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science. 2010;327:46–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1174621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Skiba PJ, Zha X, Maxfield FR, Schissel SL, Tabas I. The distal pathway of lipoprotein-induced cholesterol esterification, but not sphingomyelinase-induced cholesterol esterification, is energy- dependent. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:13392–400. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.23.13392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lange Y, Steck TL. Quantitation of the pool of cholesterol associated with acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase in human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13103–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.20.13103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA, Brown MS. Protein sensors for membrane sterols. Cell. 2006;124:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:11041–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Radhakrishnan A, Goldstein JL, McDonald JG, Brown MS. Switch-like control of SREBP-2 transport triggered by small changes in ER cholesterol: a delicate balance. Cell metabolism. 2008;8:512–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature. 1990;343:425–30. doi: 10.1038/343425a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feramisco JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Membrane topology of human insig-1, a protein regulator of lipid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:8487–96. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312623200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nagiec MM, Lester RL, Dickson RC. Sphingolipid synthesis: identification and characterization of mammalian cDNAs encoding the Lcb2 subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase. Gene. 1996;177:237–41. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen JK, Lane WS, Schreiber SL. The identification of myriocin-binding proteins. Chem Biol. 1999;6:221–35. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cowart LA, Hannun YA. Selective substrate supply in the regulation of yeast de novo sphingolipid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:12330–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700685200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mizutani Y, Kihara A, Igarashi Y. Mammalian Lass6 and its related family members regulate synthesis of specific ceramides. Biochem J. 2005;390:263–71. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guillas I, Kirchman PA, Chuard R, Pfefferli M, Jiang JC, Jazwinski SM, et al. C26-CoA-dependent ceramide synthesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is operated by Lag1p and Lac1p. Embo J. 2001;20:2655–65. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.11.2655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lahiri S, Futerman AH. The metabolism and function of sphingolipids and glycosphingolipids. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:2270–84. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7076-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Merrill AH, Jr, Wang E, Mullins RE. Kinetics of long-chain (sphingoid) base biosynthesis in intact LM cells: effects of varying the extracellular concentrations of serine and fatty acid precursors of this pathway. Biochemistry. 1988;27:340–5. doi: 10.1021/bi00401a051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Principles of bioactive lipid signalling: lessons from sphingolipids. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:139–50. doi: 10.1038/nrm2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Worgall TS, Sturley SL, Seo T, Osborne TF, Deckelbaum RJ. Polyunsaturated fatty acids decrease expression of promoters with sterol regulatory elements by decreasing levels of mature sterol regulatory element-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25537–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Worgall TS. Sphingolipids: major regulators of lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007;10:149–55. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328028fda3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dobrosotskaya IY, Seegmiller AC, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Rawson RB. Regulation of SREBP Processing and Membrane Lipid Production by Phospholipids in Drosophila. Science. 2002;296:879–83. doi: 10.1126/science.1071124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seegmiller AC, Dobrosotskaya I, Goldstein JL, Ho YK, Brown MS, Rawson RB. The SREBP pathway in Drosophila: regulation by palmitate, not sterols. Developmental cell. 2002;2:229–38. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Swain E, Baudry K, Stukey J, McDonough V, Germann M, Nickels JT., Jr Sterol-dependent regulation of sphingolipid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:26177–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204115200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Walkley SU, Vanier MT. Secondary lipid accumulation in lysosomal disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:726–36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang CC, Huh HY, Cadigan KM, Chang TY. Molecular cloning and functional expression of human acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase cDNA in mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:20747–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oelkers P, Behari A, Cromley D, Billheimer JT, Sturley SL. Characterization of two human genes encoding acyl coenzyme A:Cholesterol acyltransferase-related enzymes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26765–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anderson RA, Joyce C, Davis M, Reagan JW, Clark M, Shelness GS, et al. Identification of a form of acyl-CoA:Cholesterol acyltransferase specific to liver and intestine in nonhuman primates. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26747–54. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cases S, Novak S, Zheng YW, Myers HM, Lear SR, Sande E, et al. ACAT-2, A second mammalian acyl-CoA:Cholesterol acyltransferase. Its cloning, expression, and characterization. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26755–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khelef N, Buton X, Beatini N, Wang H, Meiner V, Chang TY, et al. Immunolocalization of acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol O-acyltransferase in macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:11218–24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.18.11218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sakashita N, Miyazaki A, Takeya M, Horiuchi S, Chang CC, Chang TY, et al. Localization of human acyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1) in macrophages and in various tissues. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:227–36. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64723-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chang CC, Sakashita N, Ornvold K, Lee O, Chang ET, Dong R, et al. Immunological Quantitation and Localization of ACAT-1 and ACAT-2 in Human Liver and Small Intestine. J Biol Chem. 2000 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003927200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chang TY, Chang CC, Lin S, Yu C, Li BL, Miyazaki A. Roles of acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase-1 and -2. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12:289–96. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200106000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Feng B, Yao PM, Li Y, Devlin CM, Zhang D, Harding HP, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum is the site of cholesterol-induced cytotoxicity in macrophages. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:781–92. doi: 10.1038/ncb1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Monte MJ, Marin JJ, Antelo A, Vazquez-Tato J. Bile acids: chemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:804–16. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pavoine C, Pecker F. Sphingomyelinases: their regulation and roles in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;82:175–83. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jenkins RW, Canals D, Hannun YA. Roles and regulation of secretory and lysosomal acid sphingomyelinase. Cell Signal. 2009;21:836–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clarke CJ, Snook CF, Tani M, Matmati N, Marchesini N, Hannun YA. The extended family of neutral sphingomyelinases. Biochemistry. 2006;45:11247–56. doi: 10.1021/bi061307z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Duan RD. Alkaline sphingomyelinase: an old enzyme with novel implications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761:281–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Leventhal AR, Chen W, Tall AR, Tabas I. Acid sphingomyelinase-deficient macrophages have defective cholesterol trafficking and efflux. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:44976–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106455200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Subbaiah PV, Gesquiere LR, Wang K. Regulation of the selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins by sphingomyelin. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:2699–705. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M500263-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liscum L, Underwood KW. Intracellular cholesterol transport and compartmentation. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:15443–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.26.15443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hao M, Lin SX, Karylowski OJ, Wustner D, McGraw TE, Maxfield FR. Vesicular and non-vesicular sterol transport in living cells. The endocytic recycling compartment is a major sterol storage organelle. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:609–17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108861200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Soccio RE, Breslow JL. StAR-related lipid transfer (START) proteins: mediators of intracellular lipid metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:22183–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Strauss JF, Kishida T, Christenson LK, Fujimoto T, Hiroi H. START domain proteins and the intracellular trafficking of cholesterol in steroidogenic cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;202:59–65. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(03)00063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maxwell KN, Soccio RE, Duncan EM, Sehayek E, Breslow JL. Novel putative SREBP and LXR target genes identified by microarray analysis in liver of cholesterol-fed mice. J Lipid Res. 2003;44:2109–19. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M300203-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang M, Liu P, Dwyer NK, Christenson LK, Fujimoto T, Martinez F, et al. MLN64 mediates mobilization of lysosomal cholesterol to steroidogenic mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:33300–10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Soccio RE, Adams RM, Romanowski MJ, Sehayek E, Burley SK, Breslow JL. The cholesterol-regulated StarD4 gene encodes a StAR-related lipid transfer protein with two closely related homologues, StarD5 and StarD6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6943–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052143799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Smart EJ, Graf GA, McNiven MA, Sessa WC, Engelman JA, Scherer PE, et al. Caveolins, liquid-ordered domains, and signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:7289–304. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.11.7289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cohen AW, Razani B, Schubert W, Williams TM, Wang XB, Iyengar P, et al. Role of caveolin-1 in the modulation of lipolysis and lipid droplet formation. Diabetes. 2004;53:1261–70. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Robenek MJ, Severs NJ, Schlattmann K, Plenz G, Zimmer KP, Troyer D, et al. Lipids partition caveolin-1 from ER membranes into lipid droplets: updating the model of lipid droplet biogenesis. Faseb J. 2004;18:866–8. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0782fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Murata M, Peranen J, Schreiner R, Wieland F, Kurzchalia TV, Simons K. VIP21/caveolin is a cholesterol-binding protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92:10339–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Uittenbogaard A, Ying Y, Smart EJ. Characterization of a cytosolic heat-shock protein-caveolin chaperone complex. Involvement in cholesterol trafficking. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:6525–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Smart EJ, Ying Y, Donzell WC, Anderson RG. A role for caveolin in transport of cholesterol from endoplasmic reticulum to plasma membrane. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271:29427–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.46.29427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baum CL, Reschly EJ, Gayen AK, Groh ME, Schadick K. Sterol carrier protein-2 overexpression enhances sterol cycling and inhibits cholesterol ester synthesis and high density lipoprotein cholesterol secretion. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:6490–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.10.6490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Frolov A, Cho TH, Billheimer JT, Schroeder F. Sterol carrier protein-2, a new fatty acyl coenzyme A-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31878–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.50.31878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Seedorf U, Raabe M, Ellinghaus P, Kannenberg F, Fobker M, Engel T, et al. Defective peroxisomal catabolism of branched fatty acyl coenzyme A in mice lacking the sterol carrier protein-2/sterol carrier protein-x gene function. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1189–201. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.8.1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fuchs M, Hafer A, Munch C, Kannenberg F, Teichmann S, Scheibner J, et al. Disruption of the sterol carrier protein 2 gene in mice impairs biliary lipid and hepatic cholesterol metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:48058–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106732200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Halter D, Neumann S, van Dijk SM, Wolthoorn J, de Maziere AM, Vieira OV, et al. Pre- and post-Golgi translocation of glucosylceramide in glycosphingolipid synthesis. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:101–15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200704091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.D'Angelo G, Polishchuk E, Di Tullio G, Santoro M, Di Campli A, Godi A, et al. Glycosphingolipid synthesis requires FAPP2 transfer of glucosylceramide. Nature. 2007;449:62–7. doi: 10.1038/nature06097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lehto M, Laitinen S, Chinetti G, Johansson M, Ehnholm C, Staels B, et al. The OSBP-related protein family in humans. J Lipid Res. 2001;42:1203–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Beh CT, Cool L, Phillips J, Rine J. Overlapping functions of the yeast oxysterol-binding protein homologues. Genetics. 2001;157:1117–40. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.3.1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Laitinen S, Olkkonen VM, Ehnholm C, Ikonen E. Family of human oxysterol binding protein (OSBP) homologues. A novel member implicated in brain sterol metabolism. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:2204–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Im YJ, Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA, Hurley JH. Structural mechanism for sterol sensing and transport by OSBP-related proteins. Nature. 2005;437:154–8. doi: 10.1038/nature03923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ridgway ND, Lagace TA, Cook HW, Byers DM. Differential effects of sphingomyelin hydrolysis and cholesterol transport on oxysterol-binding protein phosphorylation and Golgi localization. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:31621–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wyles JP, McMaster CR, Ridgway ND. Vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein-A (VAP-A) interacts with the oxysterol-binding protein to modify export from the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:29908–18. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201191200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Perry RJ, Ridgway ND. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of ceramide transport. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1734:220–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Perry RJ, Ridgway ND. Oxysterol-binding protein and vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein are required for sterol-dependent activation of the ceramide transport protein. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:2604–16. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-01-0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hanada K, Kumagai K, Yasuda S, Miura Y, Kawano M, Fukasawa M, et al. Molecular machinery for non-vesicular trafficking of ceramide. Nature. 2003;426:803–9. doi: 10.1038/nature02188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yang H, Bard M, Bruner DA, Gleeson A, Deckelbaum RJ, Aljinovic G, et al. Sterol esterification in yeast: a two-gene process. Science. 1996;272:1353–6. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5266.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yu C, Kennedy NJ, Chang CC, Rothblatt JA. Molecular cloning and characterization of two isoforms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acyl-CoA:sterol acyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:24157–63. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.39.24157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Arthington-Skaggs BA, Crowell DN, Yang H, Sturley SL, Bard M. Positive and negative regulation of a sterol biosynthetic gene (ERG3) in the post-squalene portion of the yeast ergosterol pathway. FEBS Letts. 1996;392:161–5. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00807-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tinkelenberg AH, Liu Y, Alcantara F, Khan S, Guo Z, Bard M, et al. Mutations in yeast ARV1 alter intracellular sterol distribution and are complemented by human ARV1. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:40667–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000710200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Swain E, Stukey J, McDonough V, Germann M, Liu Y, Sturley SL, et al. Yeast cells lacking the ARV1 gene harbor defects in sphingolipid metabolism: Complementation by human ARV1. J Biol Chem. 2002 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206624200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kajiwara K, Watanabe R, Pichler H, Ihara K, Murakami S, Riezman H, et al. Yeast ARV1 IS Required for Efficient Delivery of an Early GPI Intermediate to the First Mannosyltransferase during GPI Assembly and Controls Lipid Flow from the ER. Mol Biol Cell. 2008 doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Glaros EN, Kim WS, Quinn CM, Wong J, Gelissen I, Jessup W, et al. Glycosphingolipid accumulation inhibits cholesterol efflux via the ABCA1/apolipoprotein A-I pathway: 1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol is a novel cholesterol efflux accelerator. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:24515–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413862200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Weaver TE. Alveolar surfactant homeostasis and the pathogenesis of pulmonary disease. Annu Rev Med. 2010;61:105–19. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.60.041807.123500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Molday RS, Zhong M, Quazi F. The role of the photoreceptor ABC transporter ABCA4 in lipid transport and Stargardt macular degeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1791:573–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wenzel JJ, Piehler A, Kaminski WE. ABC A-subclass proteins: gatekeepers of cellular phospho- and sphingolipid transport. Front Biosci. 2007;12:3177–93. doi: 10.2741/2305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wilcox LJ, Balderes DA, Wharton B, Tinkelenberg AH, Rao G, Sturley SL. Transcriptional Profiling Identifies Two Members of the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Superfamily Required for Sterol Uptake in Yeast. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:32466–72. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204707200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Graf GA, Li WP, Gerard RD, Gelissen I, White A, Cohen JC, et al. Coexpression of ATP-binding cassette proteins ABCG5 and ABCG8 permits their transport to the apical surface. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:659–69. doi: 10.1172/JCI16000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kobayashi A, Takanezawa Y, Hirata T, Shimizu Y, Misasa K, Kioka N, et al. Efflux of sphingomyelin, cholesterol, and phosphatidylcholine by ABCG1. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:1791–802. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M500546-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sano O, Kobayashi A, Nagao K, Kumagai K, Kioka N, Hanada K, et al. Sphingomyelin-dependence of cholesterol efflux mediated by ABCG1. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:2377–84. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700139-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Higaki K, Almanzar-Paramio D, Sturley SL. Metazoan and microbial models of Niemann-Pick Type C disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1685:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Malathi K, Higaki K, Tinkelenberg AH, Balderes DA, Almanzar-Paramio D, Wilcox LJ, et al. Mutagenesis of the putative sterol-sensing domain of yeast Niemann Pick C-related protein reveals a primordial role in subcellular sphingolipid distribution. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:547–56. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200310046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Carstea ED, Morris JA, Coleman KG, Loftus SK, Zhang D, Cummings C, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1997;277:228–31. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5323.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Naureckiene S, Sleat DE, Lackland H, Fensom A, Vanier MT, Wattiaux R, et al. Identification of HE1 as the second gene of Niemann-Pick C disease. Science. 2000;290:2298–301. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Davies JP, Chen FW, Ioannou YA. Transmembrane molecular pump activity of Niemann-Pick C1 protein. Science. 2000;290:2295–8. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ko DC, Binkley J, Sidow A, Scott MP. The integrity of a cholesterol-binding pocket in Niemann-Pick C2 protein is necessary to control lysosome cholesterol levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2518–25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530027100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Berger AC, Vanderford TH, Gernert KM, Nichols JW, Faundez V, Corbett AH. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Npc2p is a functionally conserved homologue of the human Niemann-Pick disease type C 2 protein, hNPC2. Eukaryotic cell. 2005;4:1851–62. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.11.1851-1862.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sleat DE, Wiseman JA, El-Banna M, Price SM, Verot L, Shen MM, et al. Genetic evidence for nonredundant functional cooperativity between NPC1 and NPC2 in lipid transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:5886–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308456101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Infante RE, Radhakrishnan A, Abi-Mosleh L, Kinch LN, Wang ML, Grishin NV, et al. Purified NPC1 protein: II. Localization of sterol binding to a 240-amino acid soluble luminal loop. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1064–75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707944200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kwon HJ, Abi-Mosleh L, Wang ML, Deisenhofer J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, et al. Structure of N-terminal domain of NPC1 reveals distinct subdomains for binding and transfer of cholesterol. Cell. 2009;137:1213–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Friedland N, Liou HL, Lobel P, Stock AM. Structure of a cholesterol-binding protein deficient in Niemann-Pick type C2 disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2512–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437840100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Davies JP, Levy B, Ioannou YA. Evidence for a niemann-pick C (NPC) gene family: identification and characterization of NPC1L1. Genomics. 2000;65:137–45. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Altmann SW, Davis HR, Jr, Zhu LJ, Yao X, Hoos LM, Tetzloff G, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 protein is critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption. Science. 2004;303:1201–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1093131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Davies JP, Scott C, Oishi K, Liapis A, Ioannou YA. Inactivation of NPC1L1 causes multiple lipid transport defects and protects against diet-induced hypercholesterolemia. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:12710–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409110200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hegele RA, Guy J, Ban MR, Wang J. NPC1L1 haplotype is associated with inter-individual variation in plasma low-density lipoprotein response to ezetimibe. Lipids Health Dis. 2005;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-4-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Davis HR, Jr, Zhu LJ, Hoos LM, Tetzloff G, Maguire M, Liu J, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1) is the intestinal phytosterol and cholesterol transporter and a key modulator of whole-body cholesterol homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33586–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405817200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Garcia-Calvo M, Lisnock J, Bull HG, Hawes BE, Burnett DA, Braun MP, et al. The target of ezetimibe is Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:8132–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500269102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ballabio A, Gieselmann V. Lysosomal disorders: from storage to cellular damage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:684–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Pagano RE, Puri V, Dominguez M, Marks DL. Membrane traffic in sphingolipid storage diseases. Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) 2000;1:807–15. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.011101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Munkacsi A, Porto A, Sturley S. Niemann-Pick type C disease proteins: Orphan transporters or membrane rheostats? Future Lipidology. 2007;2:357–67. doi: 10.2217/17460875.2.3.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Feng B, Zhang D, Kuriakose G, Devlin CM, Kockx M, Tabas I. Niemann-Pick C heterozygosity confers resistance to lesional necrosis and macrophage apoptosis in murine atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10423–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1732494100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Tabas I. Consequences of cellular cholesterol accumulation: basic concepts and physiological implications. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:905–11. doi: 10.1172/JCI16452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis - an update. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:488–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198602203140806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hojjati MR, Li Z, Zhou H, Tang S, Huan C, Ooi E, et al. Effect of myriocin on plasma sphingolipid metabolism and atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:10284–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412348200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Li Z, Park TS, Li Y, Pan X, Iqbal J, Lu D, et al. Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) deficient mice absorb less cholesterol. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1791:297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hartmann T. Cholesterol, A beta and Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:S45–8. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01990-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hartmann T, Kuchenbecker J, Grimm MO. Alzheimer's disease: the lipid connection. J Neurochem. 2007;103 1:159–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Reid PC, Urano Y, Kodama T, Hamakubo T. Alzheimer's disease: cholesterol, membrane rafts, isoprenoids and statins. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:383–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00054.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Riddell DR, Christie G, Hussain I, Dingwall C. Compartmentalization of beta-secretase (Asp2) into low-buoyant density, noncaveolar lipid rafts. Curr Biol. 2001;11:1288–93. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00394-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ehehalt R, Keller P, Haass C, Thiele C, Simons K. Amyloidogenic processing of the Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein depends on lipid rafts. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:113–23. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200207113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Katsel P, Li C, Haroutunian V. Gene expression alterations in the sphingolipid metabolism pathways during progression of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a shift toward ceramide accumulation at the earliest recognizable stages of Alzheimer's disease? Neurochem Res. 2007;32:845–56. doi: 10.1007/s11064-007-9297-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ariga T, McDonald MP, Yu RK. Role of ganglioside metabolism in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease--a review. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:1157–75. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800007-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Valenza M, Cattaneo E. Cholesterol dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is Huntington's disease in the list? Progress in neurobiology. 2006;80:165–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Valenza M, Leoni V, Tarditi A, Mariotti C, Bjorkhem I, Di Donato S, et al. Progressive dysfunction of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;28:133–42. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Valenza M, Rigamonti D, Goffredo D, Zuccato C, Fenu S, Jamot L, et al. Dysfunction of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in Huntington's disease. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9932–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3355-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Desplats PA, Denny CA, Kass KE, Gilmartin T, Head SR, Sutcliffe JG, et al. Glycolipid and ganglioside metabolism imbalances in Huntington's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;27:265–77. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Imrie J, Dasgupta S, Besley GT, Harris C, Heptinstall L, Knight S, et al. The natural history of Niemann-Pick disease type C in the UK. Journal of inherited metabolic disease. 2007;30:51–9. doi: 10.1007/s10545-006-0384-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ohgami N, Ko DC, Thomas M, Scott MP, Chang CC, Chang TY. Binding between the Niemann-Pick C1 protein and a photoactivatable cholesterol analog requires a functional sterol-sensing domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12473–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405255101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Infante RE, Abi-Mosleh L, Radhakrishnan A, Dale JD, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Purified NPC1 protein. I. Binding of cholesterol and oxysterols to a 1278-amino acid membrane protein. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1052–63. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707943200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Cheruku SR, Xu Z, Dutia R, Lobel P, Storch J. Mechanism of cholesterol transfer from the Niemann-Pick type C2 protein to model membranes supports a role in lysosomal cholesterol transport. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:31594–604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602765200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hui DY, Labonte ED, Howles PN. Development and physiological regulation of intestinal lipid absorption. III. Intestinal transporters and cholesterol absorption. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294:G839–43. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00061.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Hanada K. Discovery of the molecular machinery CERT for endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi trafficking of ceramide. Mol Cell Biochem. 2006 doi: 10.1007/s11010-005-9044-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Chanderbhan R, Noland BJ, Scallen TJ, Vahouny GV. Sterol carrier protein2. Delivery of cholesterol from adrenal lipid droplets to mitochondria for pregnenolone synthesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1982;257:8928–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Petrescu AD, Gallegos AM, Okamura Y, Strauss JF, 3rd, Schroeder F. Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein binds cholesterol and modulates mitochondrial membrane sterol domain dynamics. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:36970–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101939200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kim WS, Weickert CS, Garner B. Role of ATP-binding cassette transporters in brain lipid transport and neurological disease. J Neurochem. 2008;104:1145–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kaminski WE, Wenzel JJ, Piehler A, Langmann T, Schmitz G. ABCA6, a novel a subclass ABC transporter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;285:1295–301. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Kaminski WE, Piehler A, Wenzel JJ. ABC A-subfamily transporters: structure, function and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1762:510–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wenzel JJ, Kaminski WE, Piehler A, Heimerl S, Langmann T, Schmitz G. ABCA10, a novel cholesterol-regulated ABCA6-like ABC transporter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;306:1089–98. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01097-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y. ATP-binding cassette, subfamily G (ABCG family) Pflugers Arch. 2007;453:735–44. doi: 10.1007/s00424-006-0134-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES