Abstract
The urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of hydroxyurea is known to exhibit biphasic kinetics, showing a rapid burst phase followed by a slow plateau phase. Kinetic isotope effects for both phases of this reaction were measured at pH 6.0 and 25°C. The observed nitrogen isotope effects for the ammonia leaving group were 15(V/K)NH3 = 1.0016 ± 0.0005 during the burst phase and 15(V/K)NH3 = 1.0019 ± 0.0007 during the plateau phase while those for the hydroxylamine leaving group are 15(V/K)NH2OH = 1.0013 ± 0.0005 for the burst phase and 15(V/K)NH2OH = 1.0022 ± 0.0003 for the plateau phase. These isotope effects are consistent with a rate-determining step that occurs prior to breaking either of the two possible C-N bonds. The observed carbonyl carbon isotope effects are 13(V/K) = 1.0135 ± 0.0003 during the burst phase and 13(V/K) = 1.0178 ± 0.0003 during the plateau phase. The similarity of the magnitude of the carbon isotope effects argues for formation of a common intermediate during both phases.
Urease catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to ammonia and CO2. The enzyme has both historical and biochemical significance. From a health perspective urease from C. pylori has been implicated in gastroduodenal disease, including the formation of gastric ulcers (1). Environmentally, ureases from soil bacteria increase soil alkalinity via hydrolysis of urea-containing fertilizers (1). From a chemical standpoint urease is a formidable catalyst; it is capable of rapid hydrolysis of urea, which has an estimated t1/2 for hydrolysis of 520 years at room temperature (2).
Urease from jack bean was the first enzyme to be crystallized (Sumner, 1926), but ironically the only reported crystal structure for the jack bean enzyme is one of poor resolution (3.8 Å), containing a bound antibody fragment (3, 4). High-resolution crystal structures are available for ureases from other sources, particularly those from bacteria. The active site residues are highly conserved for all sources of the enzyme leading to the reasonable assumption that the mechanisms of hydrolysis are also very similar (5). The jack bean enzyme is hexameric and requires two Ni atoms per subunit. A catalytically vital active site histidine (His320) is indicated by both X-ray crystal structures and mutagenesis studies of bacterial ureases; the mutant enzymes are ~105 times less active when His320 is replaced with ala, asn or gln (5, 6). The most widely accepted mechanism is one involving a tetrahedral intermediate in which: (a) one Ni serves as a Lewis acid to activate the carbonyl oxygen, (b) the other Ni coordinates to the nucleophilic water and (c) His320 serves as a general acid which donates a proton to the leaving nitrogen atom. The catalytic steps of the mechanism are summarized in Scheme 1 (5).
Scheme 1.
Nitrogen and carbon KIE experiments have been reported for the hydrolysis of urea. The magnitude of the carbonyl-C KIE and the leaving-N KIEs are 13(V/K) = 1.0206 and 15(V/K) = 1.0075, respectively (7). Because both nitrogen atoms of urea are included in measurement of the observed KIE, the actual 15(V/K) is presumably twice that (1.015) for the initial C-N cleavage, assuming no appreciable secondary 15N isotope effect at the other nitrogen. This assumes the bond to the second NH3 is cleaved after the first irreversible step. The result is consistent with partially rate-determining C—N bond cleavage. We have previously reported KIE studies of formamide and semicarbazide at pH 6.0, which are alternate, slow substrates for jack bean urease (8, 9). The rationale for these two studies was simple. Formamide has only one leaving-N and allowed investigation of all steps of the mechanism up to loss of the first nitrogen. In addition, formamide afforded measurement of five different KIEs: the carbonyl-C, 13(V/K) = 1.0241; the carbonyl-O, 18(V/K) = 0.9960; the formyl-H, D(V/K) = 0.95; the leaving-N, 15(V/K) = 1.0327; and the nucleophile-O, 18(V/K) = 0.9778. The KIE experiments for semicarbazide allowed for independent measurement of the KIE for both leaving groups (–NH2 and –NHNH2), as well as that for the carbonyl-C. In this case 15(V/K) for the leaving-N (1.0010 for –NH2 and 1.0090 for –NHNH2) indicate that –NHNH2 is the first leaving group to depart and that cleavage of this C-N bond is partially rate determining. The results for formamide and semicarbazide indicate that better leaving groups (–NHNH2 > –NH2) lead to faster (or less rate determining) C-N cleavage step.
In this paper we report a KIE study on the urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of a third alternate substrate for urease—hydroxyurea (HU). The overall reaction is given in equation 1. HU exhibits biphasic kinetics with a rapid burst phase, followed by a very slow plateau phase. The plateau phase has been attributed to irreversible (or very slowly reversible) substrate inhibition. The product, hydroxylamine, has been shown to be a weak but reversible inhibitor of urease; it is not the cause of the plateau phase (10, 11). The KIE experiments reported here include the carbonyl-C, the leaving-N for NH3 and the leaving-N for NH2OH.
![]() |
(1) |
Experimental Procedures (Materials and Methods)
Materials and Methods
Urease (from jack bean), HU, MES, EPPS, TiCl3 and LiOH were from Sigma-Aldrich. Glutamate dehydrogenase kits for ammonia determination were from Raichem. Ultrafiltration was accomplished using a Millipore YM series membrane with a 10,000 MW cutoff. Isotopic composition of the carbon and nitrogen were measured on an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) and were expressed in δ (per mil) notation as shown in equation 2, where R(sample) is the isotope ratio (heavy/light) of the sample and R(standard) is the isotope ratio of a standard. Heavy-atom KIEs were calculated using equations 3 and 4, where k/*k is the observed isotope effect (*k is the rate constant for the heavier isotope), f is the fraction of reaction, R0 is the isotope ratio (heavy/light) for the unreacted starting material or the product after complete reaction, Rs is that for substrate after partial reaction, and Rp is that for the product after partial reaction (12). Normally the notation k/*k is simply shortened to *k (e.g. 13k, 15k, etc.). For enzyme-catalyzed reactions, observed KIEs that are measured via the competitive method are actually isotope effects on V/K and are reported in an analogous fashion as *(V/K).
| (2) |
| (3) |
| (4) |
Determination of Fraction of Reaction
In a typical assay a 10 μL aliquot of the quenched reaction mixture was added to 1990 μL of water. A 200 μL aliquot of this diluted sample was then added to 1.0 mL of a solution containing NADPH and buffer at pH 7.8 in a non-continuous assay. The initial absorbance was recorded at 340 nm. A 50 μL sample of glutamate dehydrogenase was added and the absorbance was again recorded at 340 nm after 5 min. The concentration of ammonia was calculated from the difference in absorbance. Controls showed that hydroxylamine does not react under these conditions.
Enzyme Kinetics
The glutamate dehydrogenase method described above was used to determine the rates of reaction, except the aliquot from the urease reactions was 200 μL and was not diluted. The pH of the glutamate dehydrogenase assay was maintained at 7.8. The urease reaction solutions contained 50 mM MES buffer at pH 6.0 and various concentrations of HU. The ionic strength was maintained at 0.20 M with KCl. Dialysis experiments contained one sample that contained 50 mM MES buffer, 4.0 mM HU and 0.25 mg/mL urease and a second control which contained all of the above except HU. Both were allowed to incubate for 15 min. and were then dialyzed against 1.0 L of 50 mM MES buffer for 30 min. Both samples were then supplied with enough HU to bring the concentration to 4.0 mM and assayed over time with the glutamate dehydrogenase method.
Nitrogen Isotope Effect Procedures
The KIEs were measured using the competitive method via analysis of the product produced during partial and complete reactions. The KIE experiments during the burst and plateau phases had identical concentrations of all reagents. However, the total volume of solution for the burst phase was larger (6 mL) than that for the plateau phase (2 mL) to allow for an ample quantity of products for IRMS analysis. Each sample contained 0.15 M HU, urease (approximately 3.5 mg/mL), 0.50 M MES buffer at pH 6.0. Each was equilibrated to 25 °C and the reaction was initiated by addition of urease. The reaction was quenched by addition of 750 μL of 1.0 M H2SO4. The burst phase KIE experiments were allowed to run between 7.5–10.5 min. before quenching, whereas the plateau phase KIE experiments were allowed to run 5.25–10 hr. before quenching. The fraction of reaction at quench for burst phase KIEs was between 0.036 and 0.073; that for the plateau phase was between 0.31 and 0.36. Control experiments show that no further hydrolysis occurs after addition of acid. A 10μL aliquot was then assayed to determine the concentration of ammonia by the glutamate dehydrogenase method described above. The remainder of the solution was subjected to ultrafiltration at 4°C.
The resulting solution was applied to a column containing 7 mL of Biorad AG 50W X8 strong cation exchange resin (Li-form). The column was eluted with 100 mL water, followed by 40 mL of a solution containing 0.20 M EPPS (pH 8.0) and 0.2 M LiCl. The hydroxylamine was quantitatively isolated by this elution. The column was then eluted with 40 mL of 0.1 M LiOH to quantitatively elute the ammonia. The ammonia was steam distilled, rotary evaporated to a volume of 2 mL and oxidized to N2 with NaOBr for analysis by IRMS (13). The pooled hydroxylamine fractions were first quantitatively reduced to ammonia by addition of a 3 mL aliquot of 6 M HCl followed by addition of enough of a 10 wt. % solution of TiCl3 (in 20–30 wt. % HCl) to induce a permanent faint pink color. This usually required about 0.6–0.7 mL of the TiCl3 solution (14). After reduction to ammonia, the solution was steam distilled and oxidized to N2 with NaOBr as described above. Control experiments show that 15δ of N2 from combustion of hydroxylamine was the same as that from ammonia which was produced by reduction of the same hydroxylamine with Ti3+.
Complete hydrolysis of HU was accomplished in a 1.0 mL solution containing 0.50 M MES at pH 6.0, 0.10 M HU and approximately 3 mg of urease. The reaction was allowed to proceed for two days at room temperature before work up as described above. As a control the 15δ of N2 from combustion of HU was shown to be the same as the average for N2 obtained from hydroxylamine and ammonia after complete hydrolysis of hydroxyurea by urease.
Carbon Isotope Effect Procedure
The KIEs were measured using the competitive method via analysis of the CO2 produced after partial reaction. The reaction mixture contained the same reagents as described above. The solution was sparged with CO2-free N2 in a 100 mL round bottom flask equipped with a stopcock (to connect to the high vacuum line) and a sidearm containing a second stopcock. Urease was added with a syringe through a sidearm that was capped with a septum. The reaction was quenched by addition of H2SO4 via this same sidearm and a 10 μL aliquot was withdrawn for determination of fraction of reaction. The burst phase KIE experiments were allowed to run 7.5–11 min. before quenching, whereas the plateau phase KIE experiments were allowed to run 8–10 hr. before quenching. The fraction of reaction at quench for burst phase KIEs was between 0.036 and 0.058; that for the plateau phase was between 0.43 and 0.55. The flask was then attached to a high vacuum line and the CO2 was collected through two dry ice-isopropanol traps and one liquid nitrogen trap. The details of this procedure have been published previously (15). The isolated CO2 was then analyzed by IRMS. Isotopic analysis of unreacted hydoxyurea, which served as the R0 in determination of the KIE, was accomplished by combustion to CO2 and analysis by IRMS.
Results
Kinetics experiments
The rate of HU hydrolysis exhibits biphasic kinetics, which is dependent on both initial substrate and initial enzyme concentration (Figures 1 and 2). These results are similar to findings reported in the literature (10, 11).
Figure 1.
Fraction of HU hydrolysis versus time as a function of [HU] at 0.25 mg/mL urease at pH 6.1 in MES buffer. • = 0.75 mM, ▲ = 1.5 mM, ■ = 4.5 mM, ◆ = 6.0 mM. The rate of reaction was determined by measuring the ammonia produced using the glutamate dehydrogenase assay (see: Materials and Methods). Note: The y-axis is fraction of total reaction, similar to plots in ref. 10 and 11. In the above experiment, samples containing a higher initial concentration of substrate (HU) actually produce a higher concentration of assayed product (NH3) at a given time point, but this represents a lower fraction of the total possible reaction.
Figure 2.
Fraction of HU hydrolysis versus time as a function of [urease] at 1.3 mM HU at pH 6.1 in MES buffer. ■ = 0.03 mg/mL, ▲ = 0.06 mg/mL, • = 0.13 mg/mL, ◆ = 0.25 mg/mL. Note: The rate of reaction was determined by measuring the ammonia produced using the glutamate dehydrogenase assay (see: Materials and Methods). Note: The y-axis is fraction of total reaction, similar to plots in ref. 10 and 11. In all these reactions the initial substrate (HU) concentration was constant at 1.3 mM.
Substrate inhibition by HU appears to be very slowly reversible. When urease is pre-incubated with HU for 15 min and then dialyzed for 30 min, the activity of this dialyzed enzyme is somewhat less than for a control sample of urease that was dialyzed, but not pre-incubated with HU (Figure 3). In both samples the biphasic kinetics are once again observed. It must be noted that this procedure is not the same as that reported in the literature, where the diluted samples that were pre-incubated with HU were assayed with the natural substrate, urea (11).
Figure 3.
The effect of dialysis on the fraction of HU hydrolysis versus time. ◆ = initial assay with HU, ■ = 15 min. incubation without HU followed by dialysis into MES buffer at pH 6.1, ▲ = 15 min. incubation with HU followed by dialysis. The rate of reaction was determined by measuring the ammonia produced using the glutamate dehydrogenase assay (see: Materials and Methods). Note: The y-axis is fraction of total reaction, similar to plots in ref. 10 and 11. In all these reactions the initial substrate (HU) concentration was constant at 4.0 mM and urease was 0.25 mg/mL.
Isotope Effects
The nitrogen and carbon KIE procedures were subjected to the following controls: (a) The glutamate dehydrogenase assay for NH3 did not produce an absorbance change at 340 nm in the absence of urease and after quenching the reaction mixture with H2SO4. (b) The presence of NH2OH did not produce any absorbance change at 340 nm in the above assay. (c) No CO2 could be detected by manometric measurements after sparging with CO2-free N2 or after quenching the reaction mixture with H2SO4. (d) The 15δ for combustion of HU agreed with that generated by the complete hydrolysis of HU by urease followed by ion exchange chromatography, reduction to NH3 (in the case of NH2OH), steam distillation and oxidation to N2. A similar control showed no change in the 13δ for carbon (Table 1).
Table 1.
Nitrogen and Carbon Isotopic Composition after Combustion and after Complete Hydrolysis of HU.
| Experiment | 15δ for NH3 | 15δ for NH2OH | Average 15δ (both nitrogens) | 13δ for CO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combustion of HU | -- | -- | −3.7 (2) | −23.7 (2) |
| 100% Hydrolysis of HU | +6.1 (7) | −14.0 (7) | −4.0 (calc) | −23.7 (5) |
The KIEs were measured for both the –NH2 and –NHOH leaving groups, as well as for the carbonyl-C, during the burst and plateau phases of the hydrolysis of HU. The results for the burst phase are summarized in Table 2; those for the plateau phase are in Table 3. It must be noted that the plateau phase data are for the observed KIE, which means that a small part of the observed KIE is due to the burst phase. It must also be noted that the conditions for the KIE experiments are somewhat different than those for the kinetic experiments shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3. The major difference is in the concentration of HU and buffer. The KIE experiments required higher concentrations of HU (150 mM) than the kinetic experiments (0.75–6.0 mM) to produce enough CO2 for IRMS analysis. This, in turn, required higher concentrations of buffer to maintain constant pH for the KIE experiments (500 mM) than for the kinetics experiments (50 mM). A graph of fraction of HU hydrolysis versus time under the experimental conditions for measurement of the KIEs can be found in the Supporting Information. It can be estimated that under the above conditions the burst phase was complete after 5–7% of total reaction. The reactions for the plateau phase KIEs for N and C were quenched at 31–36% and 43–55% total reaction, respectively. Assuming the burst phase is complete at approximately 6% total reaction, the observed KIEs given in Table 3 must then be composed of 81–83% and 86–89% of KIE from the plateau phase for N and C, respectively (with the remainder from the burst phase).
Table 2.
Kinetic Isotope Effects on the Burst Phase of Urease-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Hydroxyurea in MES Buffer at pH 6 and 25 °C.
| atom | fa | partialb (13δ or 15δ) | productc (13δ or 15δ) | isotope effectd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| –NHOH side | 0.071 | −15.3 | −14.0 | 1.0014 |
| 0.043 | −14.7 | −14.0 | 1.0007 | |
| 0.051 | −14.9 | −14.0 | 1.0009 | |
| 0.036 | −15.6 | −14.0 | 1.0017 | |
| 0.073 | −14.5 | −12.8 | 1.0018 | |
| AVE | 1.0013 ± 0.0005 | |||
| –NH2 side | 0.071 | 4.5 | 6.1 | 1.0017 |
| 0.043 | 4.7 | 6.1 | 1.0014 | |
| 0.051 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 1.0011 | |
| 0.036 | 4.8 | 6.1 | 1.0013 | |
| 0.073 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 1.0024 | |
| AVE | 1.0016 ± 0.0005 | |||
| carbonyl-C | 0.051 | −36.7 | −23.7 | 1.0139 |
| 0.036 | −36.3 | −23.7 | 1.0133 | |
| 0.041 | −36.2 | −23.7 | 1.0132 | |
| 0.055 | −36.2 | −23.7 | 1.0133 | |
| 0.058 | −36.5 | −23.7 | 1.0137 | |
| AVE | 1.0135 ± 0.0003 |
Fraction of reaction as determined by glutamate dehydrogenase assay.
δ at quench.
Average of independent determinations from each batch of substrate.
Corrected for fraction of total reaction. Uncertaities are expressed as standard deviation.
Table 3.
Kinetic Isotope Effects on the Plateau Phase of Urease-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Hydroxyurea in MES Buffer at pH 6 and 25 °C.
| atom | fa | partialb (13δ or 15δ) | productc (13δ or 15δ) | isotope effectd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| –NHOH side | 0.31 | −16.2 | −14.0 | 1.0027 |
| 0.32 | −15.8 | −14.0 | 1.0022 | |
| 0.33 | −15.5 | −14.0 | 1.0019 | |
| 0.32 | −14.6 | −12.8 | 1.0022 | |
| 0.36 | −14.3 | −12.8 | 1.0019 | |
| AVE | 1.0022 ± 0.0003 | |||
| –NH2 side | 0.31 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 1.0012 |
| 0.32 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 1.0013 | |
| 0.33 | 4.6 | 6.1 | 1.0018 | |
| 0.32 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 1.0028 | |
| 0.36 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 1.0024 | |
| AVE | 1.0019 ± 0.0007 | |||
| carbonyl-C | 0.45 | −36.4 | −23.7 | 1.0181 |
| 0.43 | −36.2 | −23.7 | 1.0174 | |
| 0.55 | −35.0 | −23.7 | 1.0179 | |
| 0.55 | −34.8 | −23.7 | 1.0176 | |
| 0.53 | −35.4 | −23.7 | 1.0181 | |
| AVE | 1.0178 ± 0.0003 |
Fraction of reaction as determined by glutamate dehydrogenase assay.
δ at quench.
Average of independent determinations from each batch of substrate.
Corrected for fraction of total reaction. Uncertaities are expressed as standard deviation.
Discussion
HU is known to be an unusual alternate substrate for urease; the reaction is biphasic with a rapid, burst phase, followed by a slow plateau phase (10, 11). The burst phase appears to follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a reported Km = 1.25–1.60 mM and a kcat = 12 s−1 at pH 7.0 and 20 °C. By comparison urea hydrolysis follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics throughout the reaction and has a reported Km = 3 mM and a kcat = 11,000 s−1 under the same conditions (16). These kinetic experiments with HU as the substrate have been repeated in the present work and the results show the same biphasic pattern (Figures 1 & 2). However, a reliable Km and kcat could not be obtained because the burst phase was found to be too rapid for our kinetic methods. Nevertheless, our crude estimates point to kinetic constants of the same order of magnitude as those reported.
Pre-incubation of urease with HU was shown to inhibit urea hydrolysis; the amount of inhibition depended directly on the length of time of pre-incubation, with maximum inhibition occurring after 20–30 min (11). Consequently, the plateau phase observed for HU hydrolysis was initially assumed to be the result of either inhibition by the substrate (HU) or by a product, presumably NH2OH. In these studies urease was pre-incubated with HU for various amounts of time and then diluted 100-fold with buffer. This resulted in urease which had greatly reduced urea hydrolysis activity as compared to the initial enzyme. It is claimed that no recovery of urease activity is observed when the diluted samples were allowed to equilibrate for varying amounta of time before assaying the rate of urea hydrolysis. This led the authors to conclude that the observed inhibition of urea hydrolysis by HU is largely irreversible (11). Further, in these studies the product, NH2OH, was shown to be a rapidly reversible inhibitor and not likely to be a major cause of the observed inhibition. Close inspection of the data in reference 11 (Figure 2, left graph) suggests a slow recovery of urease activity when the diluted enzyme is allowed to sit for longer times (30 min.) prior to assaying the rate of urea hydrolysis. The current work also opens the door to the possibility that inhibition may be somewhat slowly reversed by dialysis (Figure 3). However, because the dialyzed enzyme was assayed with HU instead of urea and because dialysis resulted in the loss of activity for urease that was not pre-incubated with HU, a quantitative treatment of the recovery of activity is not possible. Even so, it is clear that biphasic kinetics are re-established after the long dialysis time.
Results from x-ray crystallography support the hypothesis that inhibition by HU causes the plateau phase. Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) is a substance structurally similar to HU; it is an irreversible (or possibly very slowly reversible) inhibitor of urea hydrolysis but it is not a substrate for urease. Klebsiella aerogenes and Bacillus pasteurii ureases have been crystallized in the presence of AHA at 2.0 Å and 1.55 Å resolution, respectively (17, 18). The results show that the –OH of the hydroxamate group is within 2.6 Å from Ni-1 and 1.8 Å from Ni-2 in the Klebsiella aerogenes enzyme; it is within 2.6 Å of both Ni atoms in the Bacillus pasteurii enzyme (Figure 4). These results show the hydroxamate functional group to be in bonding distance of one or both of the Ni atoms at the active site. Therefore, it is clearly possible that coordination of the –OH from the hydroxamate group of HU can displace the nucleophilic hydroxide and lead to the observed slowly reversible substrate inhibition.
Figure 4.
Crystal Structure of Urease (from Bacillus Parteurii) Active Site with Acetohydroxamic Acid (AHA) from ref. 14.
A reasonable proposed chemical mechanism based on the above experimental results is given in Scheme 2. The top pathway shows breaking of the C—N bond to the –NHOH leaving group occurring prior to the breaking of the C—N bond to the –NH2 leaving group; the bottom pathway reverses the order of C—N bond breaking. The breaking of the second C—N bond occurs after the first irreversible step and does not affect the observed kinetics and isotope effects. Since the products are only bound to Ni by the carboxylate oxygen atoms, it is unlikely that product release would limit the rate. The structure at the top represents the proposed substrate inhibitor bound to Ni-2, as suggested by the x-ray data discussed above. Substrate inhibition like that for HU is not observed for the β-nitrogen of semicarbazide because the hetero atom bound to Ni-2 is replacing a hydroxide. The pKa of the hydroxamate oxygen is expected to be around 9 and can ionize to displace the anionic hydroxide. The β-nitrogen of semicarbazide has a much higher pKa and is not capable of facile ionization. The mechanism of scheme 2 is simplified; it shows only the two required Ni atoms and the chemically important His320 (6).
Scheme 2.
Isotope Effects
The leaving-N KIEs are of a very small magnitude and do not vary significantly with a change in leaving group from –NH2 to –NHOH or a change from the burst to the plateau phase (Tables 2 and 3). An inescapable conclusion from these results is that breakdown of the tetrahedral intermediate (the k5 step, equation 5) is not appreciably rate determining under any of the experimental conditions used in this study. This means the rate determining step is either some non-chemical step or the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate. Observation of a carbonyl-C KIE in excess of 1% (see below) favors the latter explanation. Since all the leaving-N KIEs are so small, it is not possible to ascertain which C-N bond is broken first during catalysis. This is in stark contrast to the aforementioned investigation of semicarbazide as an alternate substrate for urease. Semicarbazide does not show biphasic kinetics but has a larger 15(V/K) for the –NHNH2 side (1.0090) than for the –NH2 side (1.0010), indicating that –NHNH2 is the first C-N bond broken during catalysis (9).
| (5) |
The inhibitor shown at the top of scheme 2 is a dead end complex; it affects the overall rate, but not the partition ratios in the expression for V/K. Consequently, the chemical mechanism from scheme 2 can be reduced to the kinetic expression of equation 5. The expression that governs the relationship between the rate constants and magnitude of the KIEs of equation 5 is given in equation 6, where the superscript denotes an isotope effect (either equilibrium, K, or kinetic, k). Because HU is a 500-fold slower substrate than urea, koff ≫ kcat and it is reasonable to assume that k3 ≪ k2 (16). With this assumption, equation 6 can be simplified to the expression in equation 7. Analysis of the leaving-N KIEs for the alternate substrate, semicarbazide, indicates that, given the choice of two different nitrogen leaving groups, urease chooses the one with the best leaving group ability (i.e. the lowest pka of the conjugate acid) as the first C-N bond to be cleaved (9). It must be emphasized again that all leaving-N KIEs are small for HU hydrolysis and it is not strictly possible to determine which is the first C-N bond broken. However, it is a reasonable assumption that the better of the two leaving groups is cleaved first and the following analysis will utilize this assumption.
| (6) |
| (7) |
Calculation of the commitment factor, k5/k4, is then possible during the burst and plateau phases using equation 7. This requires estimations of 15Keq, 15k3 and 15k5. The rationale for this approach and the estimations of these intrinsic KIEs has been published (8, 9). 15Keq and 15k3 were estimated from model systems to be 0.983 and 1.000, respectively. For the urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of formamide 15(V/K) = 1.033, leading to the conclusion that step 5 (k5) is rate determining. In turn, this leads to simplification of equation 7 to: 15(V/K) = 15Keq x 15k5 and allows calculation of the intrinsic KIE on step 5 of 15k5 = 1.050 (8). Using the values of 15Keq, 15k3 and 15k5 from above and 15(V/K) for HU hydrolysis (–NHOH side) in equation 7, the commitment factor (k5/k4) for the burst phase is 24 and for the plateau phase is 14. This result is within expectations, if it is assumed that –NHOH is the first C-N bond broken. In this case the trend in k5/k4 for the burst phase would roughly follow the pKa of the conjugate acid of the leaving group, where –NHOH (pKa = 6.0) has k5/k4 = 24, –NHNH2 (pKa = 8.1) has k5/k4 = 2.7 and –NH2 (pKa = 9.6) has k5/k4 = 1.2. This correlation is not strictly linear because the commitment factors do not just depend on the pKa of the leaving groups, but also on the partitioning of the two tetrahedral intermediates in scheme 2. For example, if the commitment is low, then the two tetrahedral intermediates will be in equilibrium and the rate of breakdown to products might be determined by the pKa of the leaving group. On the other hand, if the commitment is high, the two tetrahedral intermediates may not be at equilibrium and the influence of the pKa of the leaving group will be dimished. In addition, a lot of what is observed also depends on the geometry of the active site.
The carbonyl-C KIE gives a different result, where 13(V/K) changes significantly from the burst phase (1.0135) to the plateau phase (1.0178). From a purely qualitative point of view the magnitude of these carbonyl-C KIEs is relatively small. Typical magnitudes for the reactions of esters and amides are in the range of 1.028–1.034 (19). Interpretation of carbonyl-C KIEs for acyl group transfers has been difficult in the past because both theoretical and empirical studies have shown that this KIE is not very sensitive to changes in transition state structure (20, 21). In HU hydrolysis it is clear that the k5 step is not rate determining. Therefore, 13(V/K) arises largely from the KIE on the k3 step. It is possible to quantitatively estimate this intrinsic KIE on step 3 (13k3) by substituting the commitment factors calculated above, an estimation of 13Keq x 13k5 (see below) and the observed 13(V/K) for the carbonyl-C during the burst (1.0135) and plateau (1.0178) phases of HU hydrolysis into equation 8.
| (8) |
The mathematical product (13Keq x 13k5) can again be estimated from the observed 13(V/K) for the carbonyl-C (1.0241) of the urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of formamide, where breakdown of the tetrahedral intermediate (the k5 step) is rate determining. In this case equation 8 once again reduces to: 13(V/K) = 13Keq x 13k5 (8). Substituting this value and the values of the commitment factors (k5/k4) for the burst and plateau phases into equation 8 yields 13k3 = 1.0131 for the burst phase and 13k3 = 1.0173 for the plateau phase. These results are in remarkably close agreement (they should be the same), especially considering that the KIE for the plateau phase includes a partial contribution from the KIE of the burst phase.
A plausible explanation for the change in the magnitude of the carbonyl-C KIEs involves the -NHOH end of the substrate (HU) coordinating to the Ni-2, as seen in the x-ray structure for urease with structurally similar AHA bound in the active site (17, 18). An alternative explanation might have the carbonyl-O coordinated to the Ni-2 and the hydroxyl group coordinated to Ni-1. However, this does not fit the above x-ray data and, as mentioned earlier, only the hydroxyl group of HU has the right pKa to displace the anionic hydroxide that is bound to Ni-2. It is then most likely that coordination of the hydroxyl group to Ni-2 results in the observed inhibition, which is slowly reversible. At equilibrium most of subunits of this hexameric enzyme are in this inhibited form. However, if one of the monomers is still active, the commitments could change, leading to the observed change in the observed KIE.
Conclusion
HU is an alternative substrate for urease; the hydrolysis exhibits biphasic kinetics, where there is a burst phase followed by a plateau phase. The results of the heavy-atom KIE investigation of urease-catalyzed HU hydrolysis yield very small KIEs for both nitrogen leaving groups during the burst and plateau phases. Assuming (as seems likely) that urease employs the same basic mechanism for hydrolysis of HU as is used during urea hydrolysis, this result is consistent with formation of the tetrahedral intermediate, not its breakdown to products, as the rate determining step in hydrolysis. Since all leaving-N KIEs are small, it is not rigorously possible to conclude which of the two C-N bonds is broken first because bond breaking occurs after the rate determining step. However, previous studies of semicarbazide hydrolysis show that the enzyme prefers to hydrolyze the better of the two leaving groups first (9).
The carbonyl-C KIE does change significantly on going from the burst to the plateau phase, due to a change in the commitment factor, k5/k4. The most likely explanation for the onset of the plateau phase and for the change in commitment factor involves the coordination of the –OH of the hydroxylamine leaving group of HU to Ni-2 at the active site of urease. Once HU is coordinated to Ni-2, the coordinated nucleophilic hydroxide is released as water and inhibition ensues at that particular active site, thereby leading to the observed plateau phase. This inhibition appears to be slowly reversible. Because urease is a hexamer, the plateau phase is a result of at least a small number (perhaps only one) of the subunits remaining active.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations
- AMPSO
N-(1,1-Dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl)-3-amino-2-hydroxypropanesulfonic acid
- HOAc
acetic acid
- IRMS
Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry
- KIE
kinetic isotope effect
- MES
4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid
- MOPS
3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid
- NADPH
β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- tricine
N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methylglycine
Footnotes
Financial support (to W.W.C.) from NIH Grant GM18938. J.F.M. thanks Professor W. W. Cleland for summer financial support (NIH Grant GM18938).
Supporting Information Available. A graph of the fraction of reaction versus time for the experimental conditions employed for measurement of the kinetic isotope effects is provided. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Mobley HLT, Hausinger RP. Microbial Ureases: Significance, Regulation, and Molecular Characterization. Microbiol Rev. 1989;53:85–108. doi: 10.1128/mr.53.1.85-108.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Callahan BP, Yuan Y, Wolfenden R. The Burden Borne by Urease. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:10828–10829. doi: 10.1021/ja0525399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sumner JB. The Isolation and Crystallization of the Enzyme Urease. J Biol Chem. 1926;69:435–441. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sheridan L, Wilmot CM, Cromie KD, van der Logt P, Phillips SEV. Crystallization and Preliminary X-ray Structure Determination of Jack Bean Urease with a Bound Antibody Fragment. Acta Cryst. 2002;D58:374–376. doi: 10.1107/s0907444901021503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Karplus PA, Pearson MA, Hausinger RP. 70 Years of Crystalline Urease: What Have We Learned? Acc Chem Res. 1997;30:330–337. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pearson MA, Park IS, Schaller RA, Michel LO, Karplus PA, Hausinger RP. Kinetic and Structural Characterization of Urease Active Site Variants. Biochemistry. 2000;39:8575–8584. doi: 10.1021/bi000613o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schmidt HL. Isotope Effect on Each, C- and N-Atoms, as a Tool for the Elucidation of Enzyme-Catalyzed Amide Hydrolysis. In: Schmidt HL, Forstel H, Heinzinger K, editors. Stable Isotopes, Analytical Chemistry Symposia series. Vol. 11. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; Amsterdam – Oxford – New York: 1982. pp. 77–82. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marlier JF, Cleland WW. A Multiple Isotope Effect Study of the Hydrolysis of Formamide by Urease from Jack Bean (Canavalia Ensiformis) Biochemistry. 2006;45:9940–9948. doi: 10.1021/bi060630z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marlier JF, Fogle EJ, Cleland WW. A Heavy-Atom Isotope Effect and Kinetic Investigation of the Hydrolysis of Semicarbazide by Urease from Jack Bean (Canavalia Ensiformis) Biochemistry. 2008;47:11158–11163. doi: 10.1021/bi801338c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fishbein WN, Thorne WS, Davidson JD. Urease Catalysis: Stoichiometry, Specificity, and Kinetics of a Second Substrate: Hydroxyurea. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:2402–2406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fishbein WN, Carbone PP. Urease Catalysis: Inhibition of the Enzyme by Hydroxyurea, Hydroxylamine, and Acetohydroxamic Acid. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:2407–2414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bigeleisen J, Wolfsberg M. Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of Isotope Effects in Chemical Kinetics. Adv Chem Phys. 1958;1:15–76. [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Bremner JM. Isotope-Ratio Analysis of Nitrogen in Nitrogen-15 Tracer Investigations. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. American Society of Agromomy; Madison, WI: 1965. pp. 1256–1286. [Google Scholar]; (b) Weiss PM. Heavy-Atm Isotope Effects Using an Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer. In: Cook PF, editor. Enzyme Mechanisms from Isotope Effects. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1991. pp. 291–311. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tomat R, Rigo A. Effect of pH on the Kinetics of the Reduction of Hydroxylamine by Ti(III) J Electroanal Chem. 1972;35:21–26. [Google Scholar]
- 15.O’Leary MH. Detemination of Heavy-Atom Isotope Effects On Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions. Methods in Enzymol. 1980;64:83–104. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)64006-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fishbein WN. Formamide: The Minimum-Structure Substrate for Urease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;484:433–442. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(77)90099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benini S, Rypniewski WR, Wilson KS, Miletti S, Cuirli S, Mangani S. The Complex of Bacillus pasteurii Urease with Acetohydroxamate Anion from X-ray Data at 1.55 Å Resolution. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2000;5:110–118. doi: 10.1007/s007750050014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pearson MA, Michel LO, Hausinger RP, Karplus PA. Structures of Cys319 Variants and Acetohydroxamate-Inhibited Klebsiella aerogenes Urease. Biochemistry. 1997;36:8165–8172. doi: 10.1021/bi970514j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marlier JF. Multiple Isotope Effects on the Acyl Group Transfer Reactions of Amides and Esters. Acc Chem Res. 2001;34:283–290. doi: 10.1021/ar000054d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hogg JL, Rodgers J, Kovach I, Schowen RL. Kinetic Isotope-Effect Probes of Transition-State Structure. Vibrational Analysis of Model Transition States for Carbonyl Addition. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:79–85. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Marlier JF, O’Leary MH. Carbon Kinetic Isotope Effects on the Hydrolysis of Aryl Carbonates. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:5996–5998. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







