Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2010 Jul 30;192(19):5266–5267. doi: 10.1128/JB.00703-10

Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 5713, a Probiotic Strain Isolated from Human Milk and Infant Feces

Esther Jiménez 1, Rocío Martín 1, Antonio Maldonado 1, Virginia Martín 1, Aranzazu Gómez de Segura 1, Leonides Fernández 1, Juan M Rodríguez 1,*
PMCID: PMC2944511  PMID: 20675488

Abstract

Lactobacillus salivarius is a homofermentative lactic acid bacterium and is frequently isolated from mucosal surfaces of healthy humans. L. salivarius CECT 5713, a strain isolated simultaneously from breast milk and infant feces of a healthy mother-infant pair, has immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-infectious properties, as revealed by several in vitro and in vivo assays. Here, we report its complete and annotated genome sequence.


In the last years, culture-dependent and -independent analyses of the bacterial diversity of human milk and colostrum have revealed that these biological fluids are a source of live staphylococci, streptococci, lactic acid bacteria, and bifidobacteria in the infant gut (5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13), where they play a key role in the initiation and development of the gut microbiota (12). In a previous study, we isolated L. salivarius CECT 5713 from human milk and infant feces of a mother-child pair (10). Subsequent studies revealed that this strain was a good probiotic candidate since it achieved high survival rates when exposed to the gastrointestinal tract conditions, showed a strong adherence to intestinal cells, stimulated the expression of mucin-encoding genes, produced antimicrobial compounds (lactate, acetate, and hydrogen peroxide), and displayed in vivo and in vitro immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties against pathogenic bacteria (2, 10, 15). Moreover, oral administration of L. salivarius CECT 5713 appears to be an efficient alternative for the treatment of infectious mastitis in lactating women (7). Similarly, studies with other L. salivarius strains in animal models and clinical trials have demonstrated their probiotic function and, particularly, their anti-inflammatory effects (3, 14, 16).

In order to interrogate the genome sequence of L. salivarius CECT 5713 with regard to its probiotic properties, the complete genome sequence was determined by a whole-genome shotgun strategy using pyrosequencing technology (454 Life Sciences, Banford, CT). The initial draft assembly provided by 454 Life Sciences was based on 444,604 high-quality pyrosequencing reads, which assembled into 59 contigs. The genome sequence of L. salivarius UCC118 (1), a well-characterized probiotic strain, was used to order these contigs into large scaffolds.

The genome of L. salivarius CECT 5713 consists of a circular chromosome of 1,828,169 bp, two plasmids (pHN1, 44,581 bp; pHN2, 20,426 bp), and a megaplasmid (pHN3, 242,962 bp). The overall GC content of the chromosome is 32.93%, similar to that of the megaplasmid but lower than those of the plasmids (>38%). The entire genome of CECT 5713 contains 1,558 protein-, 87 tRNA-, and 51 rRNA-encoding genes. A comparison between the genomes of L. salivarius CECT 5713 and UCC118 revealed the presence of 52 protein-encoding genes that are exclusive for CECT 5713, including genes encoding a 6-phospho-β-glucosidase and three collagen-binding proteins, which may explain the high potential for competitive exclusion of pathogens displayed by this strain. The genes responsible for the bacteriocin activity of L. salivarius CECT 5713 are located in pHN3. This megaplasmid contains six open reading frames (ORFs) closely related, but not identical, to the genes responsible for the biosynthesis of salivaricin ABP-118, a two-component class II bacteriocin (4), in L. salivarius UCC118. Globally, several features of the L. salivarius CECT 5713 genome suggest a strong probiotic potential in humans.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Genome information for the chromosome, the two plasmids, and the megaplasmid of L. salivarius CECT 5713 has been deposited in the EMBL and GenBank databases with accession numbers CP002034, CP002035 and CP002036, and CP002037, respectively.

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by the FUN-C-FOOD (Consolider-Ingenio 2010) and AGL2007-62042 projects from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain) and by a research contract funded by Puleva Biotech.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 30 July 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Claesson, M. J., Y. Li, S. Leahy, C. Canchaya, J. P. van Pijkeren, A. M. Cerdeño-Tárraga, J. Parkhill, S. Flynn, G. C. O'Sullivan, J. K. Collins, D. Higgins, F. Shanahan, G. F. Fitzgerald, D. van Sinderen, and P. W. O'Toole. 2006. Multireplicon genome architecture of Lactobacillus salivarius. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:6718-6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diaz-Ropero, M. P., R. Martin, S. Sierra, F. Lara-Villoslada, J. M. Rodriguez, J. Xaus, and M. Olivares. 2007. Two Lactobacillus strains, isolated from breast milk, differently modulate the immune response. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102:337-343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dunne, C., L. O'Mahony, L. Murphy, G. Thornton, D. Morrissey, S. O'Halloran, M. Feeney, S. Flynn, G. Fitzgerald, C. Daly, B. Kiely, G. C. O'Sullivan, F. Shanahan, and J. K. Collins. 2001. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:386S-392S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Flynn, S., D. van Sinderen, G. M. Thornton, H. Holo, I. F. Nes, and J. K. Collins. 2002. Characterization of the genetic locus responsible for the production of ABP-118, a novel bacteriocin produced by the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius UCC118. Microbiology 148:973-984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jiménez, E., S. Delgado, A. Maldonado, R. Arroyo, M. Albújar, N. García, M. Jariod, L. Fernández, A. Gómez, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2008. Staphylococcus epidermidis: a differential trait of the fecal microbiota of breast-fed infants. BMC Microbiol. 8:143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiménez, E., L. Fernández, S. Delgado, N. García, M. Albújar, A. Gómez, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2008. Assessment of the bacterial diversity of human colostrum by cultural-based techniques. Analysis of the staphylococcal and enterococcal populations. Res. Microbiol. 159:595-601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiménez, E., L. Fernández, A. Maldonado, R. Martín, M. Olivares, J. Xaus, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2008. Oral administration of Lactobacillus strains isolated from breast milk as an alternative for the treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:4650-4655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martín, R., S. Langa, C. Reviriego, E. Jiménez, M. L. Marín, J. Xaus, L. Fernández, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2003. Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut. J. Pediatr. 143:754-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martín, R., M. Olivares, M. L. Marín, L. Fernández, J. Xaus, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2005. Probiotic potential of 3 lactobacilli strains isolated from breast milk. J. Hum. Lact. 21:8-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martín, R., E. Jiménez, M. Olivares, M. L. Marín, L. Fernández, J. Xaus, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2006. Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 5713, a potential probiotic strain isolated from infant feces and breast milk of a mother-child pair. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 112:35-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martín, R., H. G. Heilig, E. G. Zoetendal, E. Jiménez, L. Fernández, H. Smidt, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2007. Cultivation-independent assessment of the bacterial diversity of breast milk among healthy women. Res. Microbiol. 158:31-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martín, R., H. G. Heilig, E. G. Zoetendal, H. Smidt, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2007. Diversity of the Lactobacillus group in breast milk and vagina of healthy women and potential role in the colonization of the infant gut. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:2638-2644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martín, R., E. Jiménez, H. Heilig, L. Fernández, M. L. Marín, E. G. Zoetendal, and J. M. Rodríguez. 2009. Isolation of bifidobacteria from breast milk and assessment of the bifidobacterial population by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and quantitative real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:965-969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McCarthy, J., L. O'Mahony, L. O'Callaghan, B. Sheil, E. E. Vaughan, N. Fitzsimons, J. Fitzgibbon, G. C. O'Sullivan, B. Kiely, J. K. Collins, and F. Shanahan. 2003. Double blind, placebo controlled trial of two probiotic strains in interleukin 10 knockout mice and mechanistic link with cytokine balance. Gut 52:975-980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Olivares, M., M. P. Díaz-Ropero, R. Martín, J. M. Rodríguez, and J. Xaus. 2006. Antimicrobial potential of four Lactobacillus strains isolated from breast milk. J. Appl. Microbiol. 101:72-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sheil, B., J. McCarthy, L. O'Mahony, M. W. Bennett, P. Ryan, J. J. Fitzgibbon, B. Kiely, J. K. Collins, and F. Shanahan. 2004. Is the mucosal route of administration essential for probiotic function? Subcutaneous administration is associated with attenuation of murine colitis and arthritis. Gut 53:694-700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES