After publication of our article [1], we noticed errors in Tables 2 and 3. Under the 'Weight' column in Table 2, decimal points should have been included in this data.
Table 2.
Patient number |
Gender | Age (months) |
Weight (kg) |
Diagnosis | Length of PICU stay (days) |
Ventilator days |
Probability of death PRISM II % |
Probability of death PIM % |
Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F | 24 | 14.0 | Near Drowning | 19 | 17 | 85 | 60 | survived |
2 | F | 83 | 18.0 | Reconstruction of pulmonary artery | 18 | 16 | 7 | 6 | survived |
3 | F | 23 | 14.0 | Abdominal surgery | 5 | 3 | 78 | 17 | survived |
4 | F | 9 | 8.5 | RSV | 16 | 15 | 4 | 11 | survived |
5 | F | 31 | 16.0 | Meningococcal disease | 6 | 5 | 22 | 19 | survived |
6 | F | 2 | 4.8 | Arterial switch operation | 13 | 10 | 39 | 3 | survived |
7 | F | 5 | 7.1 | Tetrology of Fallot repair | 16 | 14 | 18 | 3 | survived |
8 | F | 8 | 6.5 | Reconstruction of pulmonary artery | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | survived |
9 | M | 4 | 4.4 | VSD repair | 13 | 5 | 26 | 1 | survived |
10 | M | 36 | 15.0 | Meningococcal disease | 5 | 4 | 8 | 7 | survived |
11 | M | 6 | 9.0 | Meningococcal disease | 5 | 4 | 9 | 8 | survived |
12 | F | 14 | 10.0 | Meningococcal disease | 4 | 3 | 28 | 9 | survived |
13 | M | 7 | 9.0 | Inborn error of metabolism | 12 | 5 | 88 | 3 | survived |
14 | F | 4 | 5.4 | Post cardiac surgery | 3 | 20 | 29 | 5 | survived |
15 | M | 17 | 12.0 | Meningococcal disease | 13 | 9 | 37 | 53 | survived |
16 | M | 24 | 13.0 | Cardiac shock | 20 | 9 | 31 | 28 | survived |
17 | M | 8 | 9.0 | Pneumonia | 20 | 15 | 5 | 4 | survived |
18 | F | 8 | 8.4 | Status epilepticus | 8 | 4 | 2 | 7 | survived |
19 | F | 28 | 10.0 | Post CPR | 4 | 3 | 70 | 46 | survived |
20 | M | 27 | 16.0 | Meningococcal disease | 6 | 5 | 61 | 63 | survived |
21 | F | 7 | 8.0 | Shock/coma | 12 | 7 | 54 | 24 | survived |
22 | M | 43 | 16.0 | Septic shock | 4 | 4 | 86 | 63 | died |
23 | F | 33 | 12.0 | Septic shock | 5 | 3 | 3 | 23 | survived |
24 | M | 32 | 15.2 | Post CPR | 18 | 16 | 40 | 2 | died |
F, female; M, male.
Table 3.
Variable | Value |
---|---|
MAP (mmHg) | 65 (57 to 76) |
Heart rate (bpm) | 139 (118 to 153) |
Cardiac index (l/min/m2) | 4.00 (3.17 to 5.19) |
GEDVI (ml/m2) | 432 (369 to 528) |
EVLWI (ml/kg) | 16 (13 to 21) |
Chest x-ray score | 133 (90 to 204) |
A-a gradient (mmHg) | 119 (74 to 168) |
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg) | 283 (226 to 374) |
PEEP (cmH2O) | 6 (5 to 8) |
Median (interquartile range).
For Table 3, the interquartile value for EVLWI should read 13 to 21 instead of 13 to 121.
The descriptions of the tables in the article are unchanged, and the corrected tables are provided here (Table 2 overleaf).
See related research by Lemson et al., http://ccforum.com/content/14/3/R105
References
- Lemson J, van Die LE, Hemelaar AEA, van der Hoeven JG. Extravascular lung water index measurement in critically ill children does not correlate with a chest x-ray score of pulmonary edema. Critical Care. 2010;14:R105. doi: 10.1186/cc9054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]