Abstract
A new benzoquinone-type retro-dihydrochalcone, named evelynin, was isolated from the roots and rhizomes of Tacca chantrieri. The structure was elucidated based on the analysis of spectroscopic data and confirmed by a simple one-step total synthesis. Evelynin exhibited cytotoxicity against the 4 human cancer cell lines, including MDA-MB-435 melanoma, MDA-MB-231 breast, PC-3 prostate, and HeLa cervical carcinoma cells with IC50 values of 4.1, 3.9, 4.7, and 6.3 μM, respectively.
Natural products have long been an important source for new drug discovery. When considering anticancer drugs, natural products continue to play a prominent role. Based on recent reviews from the Developmental Therapeutics Program of the National Cancer Institute (USA), 63% of FDA approved anticancer drugs are natural products, semi-synthetic compounds derived from a natural product, and/or a synthetic product designed after a natural product pharmacophore.1, 2 During our search for new anticancer agents from tropical plants, we found that the lipophilic extract from the roots of Tacca chantrieri caused microtubule bundling similar to the cellular effects of Taxol. We isolated the taccalonolides A and E, highly acetylated steroids from the roots and rhizomes of T. chantrieri, and identified them as new microtubule stabilizing agents.3 Plants of the Tacca genus are native to tropical areas and T. chantrieri is distributed throughout tropical Asiatic countries including Malaysia, Thailand, and southern China. The rhizomes of various Tacca species have been used by many cultures in traditional folk medicine to treat ailments including ulcers, high blood pressure, and hepatitis.4 T. plantaginea is purported to have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties5 and extracts of T. leontopetaloides were used in Africa to control slugs, snails, and roundworms.6
Over the last few decades, many classes of molecules have been isolated from T. chantrieri including diarylheptanoid glucosides,4 steroidal saponins,7 steroidal glycosides,8–10 and with an olide glucosides.11 Perhaps the most unique and well-studied class of compounds isolated from Tacca sp. chantrieri, plantaginea, leontopetaloides, and integrifolia, are the appropriately named taccalonolides.5, 12, 13 The taccalonolides are pentacyclic steroidal compounds with microtubule stabilizing properties and antitumor activity.3, 14
In the process of isolating and purifying the white amorphous solid of the taccalonolides from T. chantrieri, we noticed a yellow component that co-extracted with the taccalonolides through the process of supercritical fluid extraction and in subsequent hexanes and CH2Cl2 extractions. Solid phase extraction chromatography using successive CH2Cl2 and EtO2 extractions allowed successful separation of the taccalonolides from the yellow compound. The structure of the new compound was identified through spectroscopic analysis and biological evaluations show that it has cytotoxic activity at low micromolar concentrations.
Roots and rhizomes of T. chantrieri were extracted using supercritical CO2 with MeOH. The extract was subject to column chromatography followed by SPE to yield taccalonolides A, E, and evelynin (1).
Evelynin (1) was obtained as a yellow powder and the molecular formula was determined as C19H20O7 by HRMS (calcl. 360.1209, measured 360.1229). The 1H NMR spectrum showed signals for four methoxy groups at δ 3.98, 3.94, 3.93, and 3.80, two vicinal methylene groups at δ 3.08 (2H, J=7.8 Hz) and 2.85 (2H, J=7.8 Hz), and four aromatic protons at δ 7.59 (dd, J=8.4, 1.9 Hz), 7.53 (d, J=1.9 Hz), 6.87 (d, J=8.4 Hz), and 5.85 (s). The spin pattern of the aromatic protons indicated a 1,3,4-trisubstituted phenyl ring. The HMBC correlations of the two methoxy groups at δ 3.94 and 3.93 with the aromatic carbons at δ 153.4 (C-13) and 149.1 (C-12), respectively, indicated two of the substitutions are O-methyl groups. The additional substitution was assigned as a carbonyl functionality at δ 197.6 (C-9) by its HMBC correlations with H-15 (δ 7.59) and H-11 (δ 7.53) (See Figure 1). A p-benzoquinone moiety was suggested by two carbonyl signals at δ 178.2 (C-1) and 187.4 (C-4) and four aromatic signals at δ 157.5 (C-2), 154.8 (C-6), 132.3 (C-5), and 107.1 (C-3) in the 13C NMR spectrum and was verified by the HMBC correlations shown in the Figure 1. Two methoxy substituents on the p-benzoquinone ring were readily assigned by the HMBC correlation CH3O/C-2 and CH3O/C-6. The connection of the p-benzoquinone and the 3,4-dimethoxylbenzoyl moiety via a CH2-CH2 bridge was evidenced by the HMBC correlations between H2-7/C-4, C-5, C-6, C-9 and H2-8/C-9, C-10. The structure of 1 was determined as depicted in Figure 1 and a trivial name, evelynin, was given in honor of Evelyn M. Jackson for her many years’ contribution to this program and her recent retirement. Evelynin may, thus, be classified as a unique benzoquinone-type retro-dihydrochalcone.
Figure 1.
Structure of evelynin (1) and key HMBC correlations shown with arrows
To confirm the chemical structure and biological activities, 1 was synthesized via a simple one-step procedure as outlined in Scheme 1. The approach involves the addition of 3-(3,4-dimethoxybenzoyl)propionic acid (2) to 2,6-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone (3) via the well-known silver(I)/persulfate mediated decarboxylative radical alkylation of quinones and related compounds.16,17 The synthetic evelynin obtained via this procedure is spectroscopically identical to the authentic sample and can be readily obtained in high-purity (>98.5% by LC/MS) via recrystallization from EtOH. While the overall yield of this unoptimized approach is low (5%), the simplicity of the one-step procedure from two commercially available starting materials and its ability to provide multi-gram quantities in a relatively short period of time (<1 day) more than compensates for its inefficiency.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of evelynin via a catalytic radical alkylation approach.
The IC50 value for synthetic evelynin in the MDA-MB-435 human melanoma cell line was determined to be 4.1 μM ± 0.3. Other cancer cell lines, including the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line, the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line, and the HeLa cervical cancer cell line showed similar sensitivities to evelynin with IC50 values of 3.9 μM ± 0.1, 4.7 μM ± 0.4, and 6.3 μM ± 0.7, respectively. Synthesized evelynin was evaluated side by side with the taccalonolides for effects on cellular microtubules in A-10 smooth muscle cells and in HeLa cells. Unlike the taccalonolides, evelynin had no observable effects on microtubule density or structure at concentrations up to 40 μM, demonstrating that the cytotoxicity exhibited by this compound was not a result of disruption of cellular microtubules (Supplemental Figure 1).
Experimental Section
General Experimental Procedures
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz or a Varian QE 300MHz instrument. All spectra were measured and reported in ppm by using the residual solvent (CDCl3) as an internal standard. The HRMS was measured using a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. IR data were obtained on a Bruker Vector 22 using a Specac Golden Gate ATR sampler. The UV spectrum was measured on a Varian Cary 5000 UV-Vis NIR spectrophotometer. TLC was performed on aluminum sheets (silica gel 60 F254, Merck KGaA, Germany). HPLC was performed on a Waters Breeze HPLC system and LC/MS was recorded on an Agilent 1200 series HPLC connected to 6130 series single-quad mass spectrometer.
Biological Material
Tacca chantreiri plants were purchased from a commercial grower. The roots and rhizomes were collected from living plants grown in greenhouses and stored at −80 °C until lyophilized. A voucher specimen was used for identification of T. chantrieri and was deposited in herbarium of the University of Hawaii.
Extraction and Isolation
Dried and pulverized rhizome and root material (168.15 g) was extracted in several batches with super critical CO2 and MeOH. The crude extracts were washed with hexanes and extracted with CH2Cl2. The extracts were applied to silica gel columns (Biotage) for flash chromatography and the yellow fractions, containing evelynin and the taccalonolides, were dried. Extracts were dissolved in CH2Cl2 for solid phase extraction on silica cartridges (Burdick and Jackson). Evelynin was eluted with CH2Cl2; 59 mg of material was recovered and analyzed as described below.
Evelynin (1)
yellow powder, IR (Film): νmax 3069, 2950, 1682, 1664, 1596, 1514, 1417, 1274, 1082, 1023 cm−1; UV λmax (log ε) 274 (3.97) nm. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (dd, 8.4, 1.9, H-15), 7.53 (d, 1.9, H-11), 6.87 (d, 8.4, H-14), 5.85 (s, H-3), 3.98 (3H, s, C6-OCH3), 3.94 (3H, s, C13-OCH3), 3.93 (3H, s, C12-OCH3), 3.80 (3H, s, C2-OCH3), 3.08 (2H, d, 7.8, H-8), 2.85 (2H, d, 7.8, H-7); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.6 (C-9), 187.4 (C-4), 178.2 (C-1), 157.5 (C-2), 154.8 (C-6), 153.4 (C-13), 149.1 (C-12), 132.3 (C-5), 129.9 (C-10), 122.9 (C-15), 110.3 (C-11), 110.1 (C-14), 107.1 (C-3), 61.2 (C2-OCH3), 56.6 (C6-OCH3), 56.2 (C13-OCH3), 56.1 (C12-OCH3), 37.2 (C-8), 19.2 (C-7).
Synthesis of 1
To a 3-neck 250 mL round bottom flask was added 2,6-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone (1.7 g, 10.0 mmol), 3-(3,4,-dimethoxybenzoyl)propionic acid (3.6 g, 15 mmol) and AgNO3 (17 mg, 1.0 mmol). The flask was fitted with an addition funnel (125 mL), a thermocouple, and a nitrogen inlet valve. The flask was purged with N2 for ~20 minutes followed by the addition of degassed MeCN (75 mL) and H2O (15 mL). The heterogeneous mixture was heated to 60 °C, at which point a solution of NH4S2O8 (2.7 g, 12 mmol) in H2O (10 mL) was added dropwise via the addition funnel over a period of ~25 minutes. After complete addition, the reaction was monitored by LC/MS for product formation. The reaction was heated for a total of 16 hours and then cooled to room temperature. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL) and the combined organic extracts washed with H2O (2 × 50 mL) and 10% brine (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated to give a crude dark yellow solid (3.1 g). The product was partially purified via silica gel chromatography using a mixture of EtOAc/CH2Cl2 (3:97) as eluent to give synthetic evelynin (350 mg) in ~90% purity. This was further purified via recrystallization from hot EtOH to give pure evelynin as a light yellow crystalline solid (180 mg, 5.0% yield). All spectroscopic data matched that of natural evelynin (see above). Additional data on synthetic evelynin: mp = 165–168 °C, ESI-MS (m/z): 361 (M+H), 383 (M+Na).
Biological Assays
The MDA-MB-435 human melanoma cancer cell line was obtained from the Lombardi Cancer Center (Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.). The MDA-MB-231 breast, PC-3 prostate and HeLa cervical human cancer cell lines as well as the A-10 embryonic rat aortic smooth muscle cell line were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in Richter’s IMEM medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS and 25 μg/mL gentamicin. HeLa and A-10 cells were cultured in Basal Medium Eagle (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) with 10% FBS and 50 μg/mL gentamicin. PC-3 cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 μg/mL gentamicin. The SRB assay 15 was used to determine the sensitivity of the cancer cell lines to evelynin as previously described.14 Briefly, a range of concentrations of synthetic evelynin was added to cells in triplicate and incubated for 48 hrs. The concentration of evelynin that caused 50% inhibition of cell proliferation (IC50) was calculated from the linear portion of the log dose response curves. The mean IC50 value with standard deviation was calculated from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Cellular microtubules were evaluated as previously described.3
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NCI CA121138 (SLM), DOD-CDMRP Postdoctoral Award BC087466 (ALR), and the NCI P30 CA054174 (SLM). DEF thanks The University of Texas at San Antonio for a generous startup package.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: NMR spectra of compound 1. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References and Notes
- 1.Cragg GM, Grothaus PG, Newman DJ. Chem Rev. 2009;109:3012–3043. doi: 10.1021/cr900019j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:461–477. doi: 10.1021/np068054v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tinley TL, Randall-Hlubek DA, Leal RM, Jackson EM, Cessac JW, Quada JC, Jr, Hemscheidt TK, Mooberry SL. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3211–3220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yokosuka A, Mimaki Y, Sakagami H, Sashida Y. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:283–289. doi: 10.1021/np010470m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen ZL, Shen JH, Gao YS, Wichtl M. Planta Medica. 1997;63:40–43. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abdel-Aziz AM, Brain KR, Blunden G, Crabb T, Bashir AK. Planta Med. 1990;56:218–221. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yokosuka A, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y. Phytochemistry. 2002;61:73–78. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00168-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yokosuka A, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:1293–1298. doi: 10.1021/np020094l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yokosuka A, Mimaki Y, Sakuma C, Sashida Y. Steroids. 2005;70:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2004.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yokosuka A, Mimaki Y. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2007;55:273–279. doi: 10.1248/cpb.55.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yokosuka A, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:876–878. doi: 10.1021/np0206099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen ZL, Wang BD, Chen MQ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:1673–1676. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen ZL, Wang BD, Shen JH. Phytochemistry. 1988;27:2999–3001. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Risinger AL, Jackson EM, Polin LA, Helms GL, LeBoeuf DA, Joe PA, Hopper-Borge E, Luduena RF, Kruh GD, Mooberry SL. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8881–8888. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, Monks A, McMahon J, Vistica D, Warren JT, Bokesch H, Kenney S, Boyd MR. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1107–1112. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.13.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jacobsen N. Org Syn Coll. 1988;6:890. [Google Scholar]
- 17.For a recent example of this approach, see: Commandeur C, Chalumeasu C, Dessolin J, Laguerre M. Eur J Org Chem. 2007:3045–3052.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


