Abstract
Naphthobipyrrole is a potentially useful building block for porphyrin and porphyrin analogue synthesis. Reported here is a simple, generalizable synthetic route to α-formylated, β-substituted naphthobipyrroles and their use in the preparation of binaphthoporphycenes. The resulting binaphthoporphycenes possess a planar geometry as determined via a single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis; they also display absorption maxima that are bathochromically shifted compared to simple porphycenes.
Systems with extended conjugation pathways have attracted considerable attention in recent years due to their useful optical properties. This is particularly true in the case of porphyrin derivatives, where systems with larger π-electron peripheries have been explicitly targeted for synthesis due to their red-shifted light absorbing properties. Such motivations have provided an incentive to develop so-called expanded porphyrins (i.e., systems with larger cores than their tetrapyrrolic “parents”).1 However, they have also led to the study of a number of other analogues. Among these latter are “fused” systems, wherein multiple direct links exist between the aromatic subunits present in various porphyrin and porphyrin analogues (e.g., pyrroles). Such systems generally display lower energy electronic transitions in the UV-vis spectral region, as well as enhanced nonlinear optical behavior. For instance, the lowest energy λmax for a linearly fused octa-porphyrin was found to be 2800 nm.2 However, the preparation of fused porphyrin derivatives generally requires a near-herculean synthetic effort and often produces the target compounds in limited quantities.
An alternative approach to producing π-extended porphyrin-type frameworks involves annulation of additional aromatic rings onto the periphery of macrocyclic core. To date, linearly annulated tetrabenzo-, tetranaphtho- and tetraanthroporphyrins in the form of their respective zinc complexes have been studied in detail; these systems exhibit bathochromic shifts with the λmax for the lowest energy transition being moved to ca. 810 nm (Q band) from the 602 nm seen for the lowest energy Q band of zinc tetraphenylporphyrin.3 The palladium complexes of these annulated systems were also found to behave as efficient sensitizers for optical up-conversion via triplet-triplet annihilation when mixed with appropriate dyes.4 Crossley and coworkers recently reported even greater efficiency in triplet-triplet annihilation up-conversion by using a palladium tetraquinoxaline porphyrin.5
Other annulated porphyrin analogues are known. These include but are not limited by azuliporphyrin,6 phenanthroline porphyrins,7 and benzosapphyrin.8 However, much less is known about annulated porphycenes. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, only the fused meso-benzoporphycenes, dibenzoporphycene 1,9 and tetraben zoporphycenes 210 have been reported in the literature. On the other hand, the interesting optical and coordination features of porphycenes11 provides an incentive to extend this limited class of compounds to include other annulated porphycene derivatives. With this goal in mind, we report here a simple and efficient route to dinaphthoporphycenes 3a and b. We show that these flat systems display optical features that are bathochromically shifted compared to the parent porphycene.
The synthesis of the dinaphthoporphycenes 3a and b. is summarized in Scheme 1. It relies on the intermolecular McMurry coupling of dialdehyde precursors pioneered by Vogel,12 as do most other syntheses of porphycenes.13 The problem is thus one of preparing the appropriate annulated diformylated naphthobipyrroles. One potential precursor is the unsubstituted 7d; this is a known compound. 14 However, this particular bipyrrole has been shown to react with various electrophiles (diazonium salts, Vilsmeier-Haack formylation, aminomethylation reaction) predominantly at the so-called β positions (i.e., at carbons 3 and 8);15 this makes it less than ideal for our purposes. We therefore sought an alternative approach that would give diformylated naphthobipyrroles, such as 8a–c, wherein the reactive β positions are blocked with alkyl groups. Here, an ancillary consideration was that the judicious choice of β-substituents would provide a means of modulating the solubility of these intermediates, as well as that of the final porphycene targets.
Scheme 1.
General route to disubstituted naphthobipyrroles.
To create systems with high solubility in organic media, branched alkyl chains are attractive as β-substituents. Such branched species have been used as solubilizing groups in, for example, polymer chemistry;16 further, one particular branched system, 2-ethylhexane, functionalized at carbon 1 as both the halide and corresponding Grignard reagent, is commercially available. Therefore, our initial efforts focused on creating a bipyrrole containing this particular β-substituent. As a complement to this work, we also targeted the synthesis of analogues bearing the smaller n-pentyl and i-propyl substituents.
With the above considerations in mind, diethyl oxalate was reacted with the requisite Grignard reagents at −78° C in accord with literature procedures.17 This gave the corresponding ethyl α-oxocarboxylates 4a–c in good yields. Ethyl pyruvate 4d is commercially available.
Subsequent reaction with 2,3-naphthalene bishydrazine18 in ethanolic media at rt. led to the nearly quantitative conversion to the corresponding bishydrazones 5a–d. Compounds 5a–c are new compounds. However, the bishyrdazone 5d was reported as an intermediate leading to the synthesis of 7d (vide supra). However, full characterization data were lacking, with only melting point and elemental analysis results being provided.14
Interestingly, compounds 5a–d exist in two different geometrically isomeric forms. The individual species in question can be isolated via column chromatography over silica gel if desired. However, these compounds behave identically in the following step, namely the Fischer in-dole synthesis. Thus, they were generally used without further purification.19
Subjecting 5a–c to a ten-fold excess of ptoluenesulfonic acid hydrate in ethanol under reflux gave the diethyl 3,8-dialkyl-1,10-dihydro-benzo[e]pyrrolo[3,2-g]indole-2,9-dicarboxylate derivatives 6a–c in good to excellent yields after purification via recrystallization or filteration through a short silica gel column. We found these conditions20 to be superior to the use of polyphosphoric ester in unspecified concentration as originally used for the preparation 6d.14
It is worth noting that diesters 6a–c are also formed as a mixture of isomers; presumably different conformers arising from the restricted rotation of the alkyl substituents. The interconversion rate between the various isomers was such that in some cases the 1H NMR signals were broadened and in others more than one species could be observed at rt. In the case of the test system 6a, heating the sample to 100°C served to simplify the spectrum, producing one corresponding to a time-averaged symmetric species.
Diesters 6a–c, which contain blocking β-substituents, were saponified and decarboxylated to produce the α-free species 7a–c. This was done using a standard one-pot procedure that involves heating at reflux in ethylene glycol under an inert atmosphere.21 This gave 7a–c in 83–90% yield.
Vilsmeier-Haack formylation served to convert 7a–c to 8a–c in almost quantitative yield. As expected, 8a had the highest solubility and proved soluble in most common organic solvents. The isopropyl substituted dialdehyde 8b showed moderate solubility, which allowed for crystallization from halogenated solvents, such as dichloroethane. On the other hand, compound 8c, bearing linear n-pentyl substituents, proved minimally soluble in THF. In our estimation, this made this particular derivative less attractive for use in porphycene synthesis.22
Given the solubility characteristics of 8c, only diformylbipyrroles 8a and 8b were subject to McMurry coupling.21 Here, THF solutions of each aldehyde were added dropwise to the preformed titanium reagent in THF at reflux. This was done under an inert atmosphere over the course of 6 hours by means of a syringe pump. The reaction mixtures were then maintained at reflux overnight. A basic work-up then yielded a yellow-green fluorescent solution that was assumed to be dihydroporphycene (porphycenogen). This assignment was made on the basis of what was seen in the case of 1; here, it was found that the corresponding porphycenogen is rather stable and can be isolated.9a
Oxidation of the presumed porphycenogens was expected to give the desired porphycenes. To facilitate this process, 1 equiv. of DDQ was added. This caused the solution to turn dark blue, as would be expected were the oxidation successful. After chromatographic purification over silica gel, porphycenes 3a and 3b were isolated in 52% and 15% yield, respectively.
As proved true for the intermediate bipyrrole derivatives 6a and 8a, porphycene 3a bearing branched alkyl substituents showed poorly resolved 1H NMR spectral features at rt. While not established unequivocally, this broadening is ascribed to hindered rotation of the branched alkyl groups and the existence of two or more tautomeric species at room temperature. In the event, an increase in spectral resolution could be achieved by heating the sample to 100°C in toluene-d8 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
1H NMR spectra (low field portion) of porphycene 3a in toluene-d8 at 27 °C (bottom) and 100 °C (top).
Both porphycenes 3a and 3b display NH proton resonances at ca. 9.3 ppm (CDCl3, rt., 400 MHz). This is in marked contrast to the original unsubstituted porphycene (NH resonance at 3.2 ppm, CDCl3, 300 MHz).12 However, it is in agreement with what is seen for the dibenzoporphycene 1 (NH signal at 10.6 ppm; CDCl3).23
Both 3a,b showed identical features in their respective UV-Vis spectra (dichloromethane). In particular, Q bands were seen at 725, 671, 556 nm, and a Soret band was observed at 404 nm with shoulder at 389 nm (Figure 2). Qualitatively, these spectral features are typical for porphycenes and are thought to reflect a lower symmetry than typically found in porphyrins. In accord with design expectations, however, the visible portion of the spectrum is somewhat red-shifted as compared to non-annulated porphycenes (e.g., 2,7,12,17-tetrapropylporphycene for which Q bands at 634, 602, 562 nm are seen).24 These differences are attributed to the bipyrrole-fused naphthalene groups and to the resulting extension of the π-electron framework. Although further analyses are required, these structural changes relative to non-annulated porphycenes may also give rise to a possible intruder state,9b reflected in a weak transition at ca. 505 nm. Compound 3b proved weakly fluorescent in dichloromethane.
Figure 2.
UV-vis spectra for 3a and 3b recorded in dichloromethane (0.11 mM).
Due to its higher crystallinity (and corresponding ease in handling) relative to 3a, porphycene 3b was subject to more detailed analysis using cyclic voltammetry. This particular annulated porphycene displays a reversible 2-step oxidation process, which is characterized by peak potentials at 0.89 and 1.24 V (cyclic voltammetry, 1.5 mM/0.1 M TBAPF6/DCM vs. SCE; 100 mV/s). The fact that oxidation is more facile with respect to the tetrapropyl porphycene parent is considered consistent with a larger π-electron framework being present in 3.25 The observation of a reversible, anodically shifted reduction wave at −0.78 V (vs. −1.04 V for the tetrapropyl system) provides further support for this conclusion. However, in contrast to what is seen in the case of the parent tetrapropyl porphycene, a second cathodic wave could not be observed in the case of 3b.
This same, less soluble, isopropyl-substituted porphycene (i.e., 3b) also yielded X-ray diffraction grade single crystals upon recrystallization from chloroform/hexane. The resulting structure revealed that this particular naphthoporphycene is nearly planar (Figure 3). The average deviation for the nitrogen atoms from the mean plane (excluding isopropyl groups) is ±0.15 Å. On the basis of this structural parameter, 3b is slightly more distorted than tetrapropylporphycene for which the corresponding deviation is ±0.04 Å.12 The shortest N-N distance in 3b is 2.49 Å, whereas the corresponding separation in the parent, non-annulated porphycenes is typically 2.63 Å.12 These structural differences, together with the NMR spectroscopic data discussed above, provide support for the notion that the N-H-N hydrogen bonds in the π-extended porphycenes reported here are stronger than those present in the original, non-annulated porphycenes.
Figure 3.
Three orthogonal views of the X-ray structure of 3b. All hydrogen atoms bound to carbon atoms are omitted for clarity. Thermal elipsoids were scaled to the 50% probability level.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a facile route to disubstituted naphthobipyrroles 6–8a,c, chemistry that we think provides new precursors for use in porphyrin analogue synthesis. We have demonstrated the utility of these building blocks via the rational preparation of annulated porphycenes with extended π-frameworks. To the best of our knowledge, one of these products, porphycene 3b, is the first annulated porphycene to be subject to X-ray diffraction-based structural analysis. Detailed physicochemical studies of it and other new porphycene analogues are currently in progress.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. CA68682 to J.L.S) and the National Science Foundation (grant no. 0741973 for the X-ray diffractometer). Support under the WCU (World Class University) program (R32-2008-000-10217-0) is also acknowledged.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and characterization data of new compounds. X-ray crystallographic data of compound 3b in CIF format. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Sessler JL, Weghorn SJ. Expanded, Contracted & Isomeric Porphyrins. Pergamon: 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tsuda A, Osuka A. Science. 2001;293:79. doi: 10.1126/science.1059552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Aleshchenkov SE, Cheprakov AV, Beletskaya IP. Doklady Chemistry. 2008;422:212. [Google Scholar]; (b) Finikova OS, Aleshchenkov SE, Brinas RP, Cheprakov AV, Carroll PJ, Vinogradov SA. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:4617. doi: 10.1021/jo047741t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baluschev S, Yakutkin V, Miteva T, Avlasevich Y, Chernov S, Aleshchenkov S, Nelles G, Cheprakov A, Yasuda A, llen K, Wegner G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:7693. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheng YY, Khoury T, Clady RGCR, Tayebjee MJY, Ekins-Daukes NJ, Crossley MJ, Schmidt TW. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12:66. doi: 10.1039/b913243k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lash TD, Chaney ST. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997;36:839. [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Ono N, Hironaga H, Ono K, Kaneko S, Murashima T, Ueda T, Tsukamura C, Ogawa T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1996;1:417. [Google Scholar]; (b) Novak BH, Lash TD. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:3998. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Panda PK, Kang Y-J, Lee C-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:4053. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Vogel E. Pure Appl. Chem. 1993;65:143. [Google Scholar]; (b) Dobkowski J, Galievsky V, Starukhin A, Vogel E, Waluk J. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1998;102:4966. [Google Scholar]; (c) Dobkowski J, Lobko Y, Gawinwski S, Waluk J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005;416:128. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kuzuhara D, Mack J, Yamada H, Okujima T, Ono N, Kobayashi N. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:10060. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cuesta L, Karnas E, Lynch VM, Chen P, Shen J, Kadish KM, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S, Sessler JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:13538. doi: 10.1021/ja905284d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vogel E, Kocher M, Schmickler H, Lex J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1986;25:257. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sanchez-Garcia D, Sessler JL. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:215. doi: 10.1039/b704945e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Samsoniya SA, Trapaidze MV, Kuprashvili NA, Kolesnikov AM, Suvorov NN. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1985:1222. [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Samsoniya SA, Trapaidze MV, Kuprashvili NA, Samsoniya NSh, Suvorov NN. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1994:1048. [Google Scholar]; Samsoniya SA, Trapaidze MV, Kuprashvili NA, et al. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1998:942. [Google Scholar]; (b) Trapaidze MV, Samsoniya SA, Kuprashvili NA, Mamaladze LM, Suvorov NN. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1988:603. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Li X, Xiao Y, Qian X. Org. lett. 2008;10:2885. doi: 10.1021/ol801081w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Surin M, Hennebicq E, Ego C, Marsitzky D, Grimsdale AC, Mullen K, Bredas J-L, Lazzaroni R, Leclere P. Chem. Mat. 2004;16:994. [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Rambaud M, Bakasse M, Duguay G, Villieras J. Synthesis. 1988:564. [Google Scholar]; (b) Weinstock LM, Currie RB, Lovell AV. Synth. Commun. 1981;11:943. [Google Scholar]; (c) Rozen S, Ben-David I. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:496. doi: 10.1021/jo0013094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Singh J, Kissick TP, Mueller RH. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1989;21:501. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Franzen H. Ber. Chem. 1905;38:266. [Google Scholar]; Franzen H. J. Prak. Chem. 1908;76:205. [Google Scholar]
- 19.For more details see Figure S1 in supporting information
- 20.Wagaw S, Yang BH, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:6621. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stepien M, Donnio B, Sessler JL. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;13:6853. doi: 10.1002/chem.200700125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Recently, we became aware that the group of Panda made 8c and apparently carried it on to the corresponding porphycene. However, no structural data was presented. (Panda, P. K.; Sarma, T. Abstracts of the Sixth International Conference on Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines (ICPP6) New Mexico, USA, 2010, p 191.)
- 23.Pietrzak M, Shibl MF, Broring M, Kuhn O, Limbach H-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:296. doi: 10.1021/ja065170b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bernard C, Gisselbrecht JP, Gross M, Jux N, Vogel E. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1995;381:159. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gisselbrecht JP, Gross M, Koecher M, Lausmann M, Vogel E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:8618. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






