Abstract
The epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) is comprised of three homologous subunits (α, β, and γ) that have a similar topology with two transmembrane domains, a large extracellular region, and cytoplasmic N and C termini. Although ENaC activity is regulated by a number of factors, palmitoylation of its cytoplasmic Cys residues has not been previously described. Fatty acid-exchange chemistry was used to determine whether channel subunits were Cys-palmitoylated. We observed that only the β and γ subunits were modified by Cys palmitoylation. Analyses of ENaCs with mutant β subunits revealed that Cys-43 and Cys-557 were palmitoylated. Xenopus oocytes expressing ENaC with a β C43A,C557A mutant had significantly reduced amiloride-sensitive whole cell currents, enhanced Na+ self-inhibition, and reduced single channel Po when compared with wild-type ENaC, while membrane trafficking and levels of surface expression were unchanged. Computer modeling of cytoplasmic domains indicated that β Cys-43 is in proximity to the first transmembrane α helix, whereas β Cys-557 is within an amphipathic α-helix contiguous with the second transmembrane domain. We propose that β subunit palmitoylation modulates channel gating by facilitating interactions between cytoplasmic domains and the plasma membrane.
Keywords: Intracellular Trafficking, Ion Channels, Protein Palmitoylation, Sodium Channels, Sodium Transport, ENaC, Epithelial Sodium Channel, Channel Gating
Introduction
Epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs)4 mediate amiloride-sensitive Na+ transport across the apical membrane of high resistance epithelia and have important roles in regulating extracellular fluid volume and blood pressure, as well as airway surface liquid volume and mucociliary clearance. The α, β, and γ subunits of ENaC are members of the ENaC/Degenerin family of ion channels, which include H+-gated channels (referred to as acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)) that are expressed in mammalian central and peripheral nervous systems and have a role in nociception and mechanosensation (1). ENaC and other family members are ion channels composed of subunits that have a similar topology with two transmembrane helices, a large extracellular region, including numerous conserved disulfide bridges, and cytoplasmic N and C termini. The recently resolved crystal structure of ASIC1 (2) revealed a homotrimer with highly organized extracellular regions, suggesting that ENaC is an α1β1γ1 heterotrimer.
ENaCs are assembled within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where they undergo N-linked glycosylation. Assembly is inefficient, and the majority of newly synthesized subunits undergo ER-associated degradation with a half-life of 1–2 h as determined by metabolic labeling (3–7). A small pool of newly synthesized subunits has a significantly longer half-life (>4 h) and represents assembled channels that have exited the ER and are present in later compartments. This latter pool contains subunits whose N-glycans have undergone both Golgi-dependent terminal processing and cleavage of α and γ by furin, a protease localized primarily to the trans-Golgi network (5, 8, 9). ENaC exit from the ER is regulated by a signal within the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the α subunit (αRSRYW620 in murine ENaC) that resembles the well described cytoplasmic dibasic motifs recognized by the coat protein complex II prebudding (7). Interestingly, some fraction of ENaC reaches the cell surface lacking Golgi-associated processing: the N-glycans are not processed, and the α and γ subunits are not cleaved (11). Proteolytic cleavage of ENaC by furin, and by other proteases in the post-Golgi compartment(s) under normal and pathological states, activates the channel by releasing small inhibitory peptides from α and γ, respectively, and thereby increasing channel open probability (Po) (for review, see Refs. 12–17).
Ubiquitination of ENaC by Nedd4-2 and de-ubiquitination of ENaC by UCH-L3 or Usp2–45 differentially regulate ENaC membrane trafficking after reaching the cell surface, and prolonged residence on the cell surface further activates the channel by increasing subsequent proteolysis (18–20). ENaC channel gating and membrane trafficking are also regulated by inositol phospholipids presumably by binding cationic residues within the β and γ subunits (21–25; for review, see Ref. 26).
Post-translational modification of channels by Cys palmitoylation is another potential mechanism for modulating ENaC activity. In mammals, there are 23 members of the palmitoyltransferase family, also known as DHHC Cys-rich domain-containing proteins (or “DHHC proteins”), which catalyze the palmitoylation of proteins at specific cytoplasmic Cys residues (27, 28). DHHC refers to the conserved reactive site residues (Asp-His-His-Cys) found in all palmitoyltransferases. Cys palmitoylation of proteins is often found near hydrophobic moieties, including (i) C-terminal prenyl groups, (ii) N-terminal myristoyl groups, (iii) other palmitoylated Cys residues, and (iv) transmembrane domains (29). Transient Cys palmitoylation of soluble cytoplasmic proteins may reversibly enhance their membrane association by providing an acyl group and thereby increasing hydrophobicity. The subcellular localization of specific palmitoyltransferases determines their target membrane for soluble protein substrates (for reviews, see Refs. 28, 29). Recent reports indicate that subcellular localization of palmitoyltransferases also provides the functional setting for modification of transmembrane proteins (30).
Cys palmitoylation has a primary or secondary role in ER quality control. This modification is essential for the proper folding and ER exit of several multitransmembrane proteins (31–35). Transient palmitoylation also differentially regulates membrane trafficking of proteins at the cell surface. For example, Cys mutations that block palmitoylation (i) inhibit endocytosis of the asialoglycoprotein receptor (36), (ii) stimulate endocytosis (but not recycling) of the transferrin receptor (37), and (iii) inhibit recycling (but not endocytosis) of the transmembrane mucin MUC1 (38). Mutations that prevent Cys palmitoylation also (i) block interactions of tetraspanin CD151 with integrin α6β4 (39), (ii) block association of the netrin-1 receptor with lipid microdomains (40), and (iii) alter the function of several G-protein-coupled receptors (34, 41). Palmitoylation of the Kv1.1 channel facilitates K+ channel interactions with plasma membrane lipids, which contributes to electric field-induced conformational changes (42). Clearly, Cys palmitoylation has a key role in modulating the membrane trafficking and activity of many transmembrane proteins.
Using fatty acid-exchange chemistry we found that the β and γ ENaC subunits, but not the α subunit, are modified by Cys palmitoylation. Although there are five cytoplasmic Cys residues in the β subunit, we found that only the Cys adjacent to the first and second transmembrane domains are palmitoylated. Expression of ENaC with a mutant β subunit lacking these two Cys exhibited reduced amiloride-sensitive currents when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Analysis of ENaC membrane trafficking, surface levels (N), and single channel recordings showed that the reduction in ENaC activity reflected a lower channel Po. Our results suggest that Cys palmitoylation of the β subunit modulates channel gating, perhaps by stabilizing the open state of the channel.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Vectors and Cell Culture
Wild-type (WT), and N-terminal and C-terminal epitope-tagged mouse ENaC subunit cDNAs, were previously described (8, 43). The β subunit mutations were generated in pCDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen) using a standard two-step PCR method. MDCK type 1 cells were a gift from Barry M. Gumbiner (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York) and MDCK type 2 cells were obtained from Gerard Apodaca (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA). Cells were cultured and transfected with ENaC cDNAs as previously described (8).
Assay for Protein Cys Palmitoylation in MDCK Cells
Cys palmitoylation of ENaC subunits was assessed using fatty acid-exchange chemistry whereby S-palmitate is selectively removed by treatment with hydroxylamine and exchanged for biotin (44, 45). We optimized conditions for assaying ENaC palmitoylation. αβγENaC was transiently expressed in MDCK (type 1 or type 2) cells, where the α, β, or γ subunit had both an N-terminal HA tag and a C-terminal V5 tag, and the other two subunits lacked epitope tags. Cells were plated at 90% confluency on plastic (24-mm well of a 12-well Costar Cluster, Corning, NY) the day before transfection with plasmids and Lipofectamine 2000 (Carlsbad, CA). The day after transfection, cells were extracted for 20 min at room temperature on a rotating shaker using 200 μl of detergent buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 4 mg/ml deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40) containing 50 mm N-ethylmaleimide to alkylate free Cys residues. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,800 × g for 7 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was recovered, and ENaC was immunoprecipitated (IP) in a 1.5-ml micro tube (with snap cap) with 10 μl of goat anti-V5 antibodies immobilized on agarose (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., Montgomery, TX) by incubation overnight at 4 °C with end-over-end mixing. 20 μl of Sepharose CL6 beads were then added as carrier to each IP. The IPs were washed twice with 1% Triton X-100 in HEPES buffer (10 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl) and once with HEPES buffer, by vortexing and centrifuging at room temperature twice for 0.5 min at 9,300 × g and removing all liquid with a Hamilton syringe (0.1 ml Gastight #1710, 22 s, inner diameter 0.71 mm, Hamilton Co., Reno, NV). IPs were resuspended into 0.5 ml of either 1 m hydroxylamine-HCl (pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 0.2% Triton X-100) to remove S-palmitate or 1 m Tris-HCl (pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 0.2% Triton X-100) as a control. The tubes were rotated end-over-end at room temperature for 60 min and centrifuged at room temperature, and all liquid was removed with a Hamilton syringe. Pellets were washed twice with 1% Triton X-100 in HEPES buffer and resuspended in 0.5 ml of 0.2 mg/ml EZ-Link® (+)-biotinyl-3-maleimidopropionamidyl-3,6-dioxaoctanediamine (maleimide-PEO2-biotin from Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) in 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7, 150 mm NaCl, and 0.2% Triton X-100) to label newly exposed Cys sulfhydryls. Tubes were incubated at room temperature with end-over-end rotation for 2 h before washing twice with 0.01% SDS in HEPES buffer, and all liquid was removed with a Hamilton syringe. ENaC was released from the beads by adding 60 μl of 1% SDS HEPES buffer and heating at 90–100 °C for 2 min. The tubes were centrifuged at room temperature, and the supernatant was recovered with a Hamilton syringe and moved to a new tube. 10% was removed to determine the “Total IP,” and the remainder was mixed with 0.8 ml of 0.5% Triton X-100 in HEPES buffer and 30 μl of Streptavidin-conjugated agarose to recover the newly biotinylated ENaC. The samples were incubated overnight with end-over-end rotation at 4 °C and then washed with 1% Triton X-100 in HEPES buffer followed by one wash with HEPES buffer. All liquid was removed with a Hamilton syringe, and the pellet was incubated for 3.5 min at 90–100 °C with Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) plus 0.7 m β-mercaptoethanol, and the precipitated proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with either mouse anti-V5 antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Invitrogen) or mouse anti-V5 antibodies (Invitrogen) and goat anti-mouse second antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Bands were visualized using Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and quantified with a Bio-Rad Versadoc (Bio-Rad) and Bio-Rad Quantity One software. The percentage of biotinylated subunit was calculated for each sample based on the total IP. The difference in the percentage of biotinylated subunit following hydroxylamine treatment, and the percentage of biotinylated subunit following Tris treatment (i.e. control) represents the percentage of the subunit that was palmitoylated.
Functional Expression and Biochemistry in Xenopus Oocytes
ENaC expression in Xenopus oocytes, two-electrode voltage clamp and chemiluminescent surface detection of ENaC were performed as previously reported (46–48). Oocytes were injected with WT α and γ, along with WT or mutant β cRNAs (1–2 ng of each), and electrophysiological measurements were performed 24 h post-injection. The difference in measured current at −100 mV in the absence and presence of amiloride (10 μm) was used to define ENaC-mediated currents. The protocol for harvesting oocytes from Xenopus laevis was approved by the University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Membrane Trafficking in Xenopus Oocytes
ENaC exocytosis and endocytosis in Xenopus oocytes were determined as previously described (47, 49, 50). Biotinylation of cell-surface proteins expressed in oocytes and immunoblot analysis of biotinylated ENaC was previously described (51, 52). Briefly, channel endocytosis was determined by measuring the time-dependent loss of cell Na+ currents in the presence of brefeldin A to block forward channel trafficking. Channel exocytosis was performed using an amiloride-binding site mutant αS583C. Surface channels with αS583C are blocked by treatment with 1 mm [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate bromide (MTSET). The initial rate of current recovery reflects the rate of channel exocytosis. As these channels are relatively insensitive to amiloride, 100 μm benzamil was used to block ENaC and determine the ENaC-insensitive component of the whole cell Na+ current.
Sodium Self-inhibition
To evaluate Na+ self-inhibition (SSI), a low [Na+] bath solution (1 mm NaCl) was rapidly replaced by a high [Na+] bath solution (110 mm NaCl) while the oocytes expressing ENaC subunits were continuously clamped at −100 mV. The peak current (Ipeak) and steady-state current (Iss) were determined as previously described (53). The ratio Iss/Ipeak was used as a measure of the Na+ self-inhibition response, with a smaller value indicating greater Na+ self-inhibition.
Single Channel Recordings
Patch clamp was performed in oocytes expressing WT or mutant ENaCs as previously described (54, 55). Both pipette and bath solutions were the same as the high [Na+] solution for testing Na+ self-inhibition (110 mm NaCl). Patch clamp with a cell-attached configuration was performed using a PC-One Patch Clamp amplifier (Dagan Corp., Minneapolis, MN) and a DigiData 1322A interface connected to a PC. Patches were clamped at membrane potentials (negative value of pipette potentials) of −40 to −100 mV. Software pClamp 8 or 10 (Molecular Devices Corp./MDS Analytical Technologies) was used for data acquisition and analyses. Single-channel recordings were acquired at 5 kHz, filtered at 300 Hz by using a built-in, four-pole, low pass Bessel filter. Po was estimated by single-channel search function of pClamp 10 from 5-min recordings that contained only 2 current levels (closed and open states) at a clamping membrane potential of −100 mV. Single-channel conductance was obtained by linear-fitting unitary currents against clamping voltages in the range of −40 and −100 mV. Unitary currents were determined by averaging multiple cursor measurements at each voltage.
Statistical Analyses
Comparisons between groups were performed with Student's t tests. A p value of <0.05 was considered significantly different.
RESULTS
ENaC Is Palmitoylated on the β and γ Subunits
Palmitoylation occurs primarily on cytoplasmic Cys residues, and there are five cytoplasmic Cys residues within the α subunit, five within β, and two within γ. Cys palmitoylation of ENaC subunits was assessed using fatty acid-exchange chemistry whereby S-palmitate, selectively removed by treatment with hydroxylamine, is exchanged for biotin (44, 45). ENaC was transiently expressed in MDCK cells, where α, β, or γ had both an N-terminal HA tag and a C-terminal V5 tag, but the other two subunits lacked tags. Cells were extracted in detergent in the presence of N-ethylmaleimide to alkylate free Cys sulfhydryl groups, and ENaC was immunoprecipitated with a goat anti-V5 antibody conjugated to beads. The IPs on beads were treated with 1 m hydroxylamine to release palmitate from Cys (or 1 m Tris as a control), prior to treatment with maleimide-PEO2-biotin to biotinylate newly exposed Cys sulfhydryl groups. Ten percent of each treated IP was reserved to quantify total ENaC within the sample, and the remainder was incubated with streptavidin-conjugated beads to recover biotinylated (i.e. palmitoylated) subunits. Both the immature (endoglycosidase H-sensitive and not cleaved) and mature (endoglycosidase H-resistant and cleaved) forms of each subunit were detected by quantitative immunoblotting with anti-V5 antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase using a Bio-Rad Versadoc (Fig. 1A). The percentage of biotinylated subunit was determined for samples treated with either hydroxylamine or Tris. The difference in extent of subunit biotinylation following hydroxylamine versus Tris treatment represents the percentage of the subunit that is palmitoylated (Fig. 1B). Greater levels of β and γ (but not α) subunit biotinylation after treatment with hydroxylamine (versus Tris) were observed, consistent with Cys palmitoylation of the β and γ subunits. We observed that 14 ± 0.2% of β subunits and 8.8 ± 0.4% of γ subunits were palmitoylated (mean ± S.E. for n = 3 experiments).
ENaCs Lacking Sites for β Subunit Palmitoylation Exhibit Reduced Activity
The five cytoplasmic Cys residues in the β subunit were individually mutated to Ala (βC10A, βC30A, βC43A, βC557A, and βC595A), and palmitoylation of these epitope-tagged mutants was assessed when co-expressed with non-tagged WT α and γ (Fig. 2, A and B). We observed that palmitoylation of either βC43A or βC557A was significantly reduced when compared with WT β. Levels of palmitoylation of the double mutant βC43A,C557A and a quadruple mutant βC30A,C43A,C557A,C595A were similar to that observed with the single βC43A or βC557A mutants, representing background labeling of ∼4% of the total β subunit pool. In contrast, biotin labeling of the WT β subunit was 9.2 ± 1.3% of the total β subunit pool (mean ± S.E. for n = 7–20 experiments). Altogether, these results indicated that ENaC is palmitoylated both on βCys-43 at the junction of the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain and the first transmembrane domain (M1), and on βCys-557 near the junction of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain and the second transmembrane domain (M2).
We examined whether the βC43A,C557A mutant affected ENaC activity. Whole cell amiloride-sensitive currents were measured in Xenopus oocytes expressing either (i) WT ENaC, (ii) αβC43Aγ, (iii) αβC557Aγ, or (iv) αβC43A,C557Aγ. Currents were significantly reduced in oocytes expressing either single or double β subunit Cys mutation(s), although the βC43A and βC43A,C557A mutants reduced whole cell currents to similar levels (Fig. 2C). Whole cell amiloride-sensitive currents in oocytes expressing (i) αβC10Aγ, (ii) αβC30Aγ, or (iii) αβC595Aγ were not significantly different from currents in oocytes expressing WT ENaC (Fig. 2D).
ENaC Lacking βC43,557 Palmitoylation Exhibit Normal Surface Expression and Membrane Trafficking
Palmitoylation of the β subunit adjacent to the transmembrane domains could modulate channel activity by either altering the number of surface channels (N) by affecting membrane trafficking and/or by altering channel Po. Three different assays were used to assess levels of surface expression of WT and αβC43A,C557Aγ channels. Oocytes expressing ENaC with WT β or mutant βC43A,C557A (24–48 h post-injection of cRNA) were subjected to: (i) surface biotinylation of ENaC, or (ii) antibody-based surface chemiluminescence detection of ENaC. Alternatively (iii) amiloride-sensitive currents were assessed using the βS518K degenerin mutation (i.e. αβS518Kγ versus αβS518K, C43A,C557Aγ), because ENaC is fully activated with the βS518K degenerin mutation. Concurrently, we measured rates of ENaC exocytosis and endocytosis to identify any effects of βC43A,C557A mutations on ENaC trafficking.
Oocyte surface biotinylation was carried out as previously described (52). Briefly, oocytes expressing ENaC with C-terminal V5-tagged WT β or mutant βC43A,C557A were treated with membrane-impermeant sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin prior to extraction with detergent and recovery of biotinylated proteins with streptavidin-conjugated agarose. Five percent of the extract was retained for immunoprecipitation with anti-V5 antibodies and represented the total cellular pool of the β subunit. Quantitative immunoblot analyses of all samples using a Bio-Rad Versadoc revealed that there was no significant difference in the fraction of biotinylated β subunit on the cell surface when ENaC palmitoylation was blocked by the βC43A,C557A mutation (Fig. 3, A and B).
Chemiluminescence detection of surface ENaC was carried out as previously described (47). Briefly, oocytes expressing ENaC with a WT β subunit or mutant βC43A,C557A (both the WT and mutant β subunits contained an external FLAG-epitope tag) were incubated for 1 h on ice with an anti-FLAG antibody and then an HRP-tagged second antibody. Individual oocytes were placed in chemiluminescence reagent for 1 min at room temperature prior to quantitation with a luminometer (Fig. 3C). Oocytes expressing ENaC with a non-epitope-tagged β were used as a negative control. No significant difference in the level of chemiluminescence was observed when β subunit palmitoylation was blocked with the βC43A,C557A mutation.
Amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents were measured in oocytes expressing ENaC with a βS518K degenerin mutation that increases the Po to ∼1 (56). The βC43A,C557A mutations were also introduced onto this βS518K background. No significant difference in whole cell amiloride-sensitive Na+ current was observed due to the βC43A,C557A mutant in the presence of the activating degenerin mutation (57), in contrast to the significant reduction in channel activity that was observed between WT ENaC and channels lacking β subunit palmitoylation due to the βC43A,C557A mutant (p < 0.02) in the absence of the activating degenerin mutation (Fig. 3D).
Concurrently, we measured the rates of exocytosis and endocytosis of ENaC with a WT β subunit or the βC43A,C557A mutant in oocytes using our published protocols (50). Membrane-impermeant MTSET irreversibly blocks ENaCs at the cell surface when channels have an αS583C mutation (58). Briefly, ENaC exocytosis was measured by treating oocytes expressing ENaC αS583Cβγ or αS583CβC43A,C557Aγ, with 1 mm MTSET for 4 min to inhibit surface channels. After removing MTSET from the bath, amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents were measured by two-electrode voltage clamp every 30 s for 5 min to monitor current recovery. The rates of recovery were similar for ENaC with WT β or the βC43A,C557A mutant (Fig. 4A).
ENaC endocytosis was determined by measuring amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in oocytes expressing αβγ or mutant αβC43A,C557Aγ, before and 1.5 and 3 h after the initiation of incubation with brefeldin A to block delivery of newly synthesized ENaC to the cell surface. We observed a similar decay of whole cell amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents with oocytes expressing WT ENaC or the αβC43A,C557Aγ mutant, indicating that rates of endocytosis were similar (Fig. 4B).
ENaC Lacking Sites for β Subunit Palmitoylation Exhibit Reduced Channel Po
As WT and αβC43A,C557Aγ channels are expressed at the cell surface at similar levels, the reduced channel activity we observed with the βC43A,C557A mutant is likely due to a reduced channel Po. Na+ self-inhibition reflects a reduction in channel activity in the presence of a high external [Na+]. We have previously shown that ENaC Po correlates with the degree of Na+ self-inhibition; the greater the extent of Na+ self-inhibition, the lower the channel Po (53). We assessed the Na+ self-inhibition response of WT channels and the mutant (αβC43A,C557Aγ) lacking sites for β subunit palmitoylation, by monitoring whole cell Na+ currents in oocytes bathed in a low [Na+] solution (1 mm NaCl), which was rapidly changed to a high [Na+] bath solution (110 mm NaCl) (Fig. 5A). Following the change to a high [Na+] solution, Na+ currents rapidly rise to a peak current (Ipeak), followed by a decay to a steady-state current (Iss). The ratio of Iss/Ipeak reflects the magnitude of the Na+ self-inhibition response, with a smaller value indicating greater Na+ self-inhibition. We found that ENaC with the βC43A,C557A mutant had a significantly greater Na+ self-inhibition response when compared with WT ENaC (Fig. 5B, p < 0.02, n = 16–18), suggesting that mutating sites of β subunit palmitoylation reduced channel Po.
To directly assess whether ENaCs lacking sites for β subunit palmitoylation have a reduced channel Po, oocytes expressing WT or αβC43A,C557Aγ channels were subjected to cell-attached patch clamp. As shown in Fig. 5, C–E, WT ENaC expressed in oocytes exhibited an intermediate Po of 0.45 ± 0.08, whereas αβC43A,C557Aγ channels had a significantly lower Po (0.17 ± 0.06; p < 0.05, n = 6). Interestingly, the unitary Na+ conductance of αβC43A,C557Αγ (5.1 ± 0.1 pS) was modestly, but significantly greater than WT conductance (4.2 ± 0.1 pS) (p < 0.001, n = 4).
The β Subunit C43A,C557A Mutation Does Not Alter the Extent of α or γ Subunit Cleavage
We previously reported that α subunit cleavage at two sites by the protease furin, as well as γ subunit cleavage by furin and a second protease, activates ENaC by releasing inhibitory tracts and increasing channel Po (53, 55). We examined whether the reduced Po of channels lacking sites for β subunit palmitoylation reflected a reduced fraction of cleaved channel at the cell surface. Oocytes expressing WT or αβC43A,C557Aγ channels and either a C-terminal V5 epitope-tagged α or γ subunit were treated with the membrane-impermeant sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin. Cell surface (biotinylated) ENaCs were recovered with streptavidin-conjugated agarose and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-V5 antibodies to reveal the full-length α (95 kDa) or γ (93 kDa) subunits, as well as the cleaved α (65 kDa) or γ (75 kDa) forms (Fig. 6A). Our results in Fig. 6, A and B, showed that the fraction of cleaved α and γ was not significantly altered by blocking palmitoylation of βC43 and βC557 (p = 0.59 for α, and p = 0.16 for γ).
DISCUSSION
Palmitoylation of Ion Channels Has Diverse Functional Effects
There are few reports of Cys palmitoylation of ion channels. The functional consequences of channel palmitoylation are diverse and include effects on channel activity, membrane trafficking, and stability. For example, PKA-dependent phosphorylation and inhibition of large conductance calcium- and voltage-gated potassium (BK) channels is dependent on Cys palmitoylation of two key Cys residues within the Cys-rich STREX (stress regulated exon) domain of the cytoplasmic C terminus of the pore-forming α subunit (59). Palmitoylation of the STREX domain results in channel activation and enhances the association of the C-terminal tail of the α subunit with the plasma membrane. In contrast, PKA-mediated phosphorylation of an adjacent Ser within the same subunit of the tetrameric structure inhibits channel activity as well as the interaction of the channel's C terminus with the plasma membrane. The GluR6 kainate receptor, a ligand-gated ion channel, is palmitoylated on two cytoplasmic Cys residues (60). Cells expressing receptors with mutations of these Cys residues exhibited normal kainate-dependent currents and similar levels of receptors, but PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the mutant channel in an in vitro assay was 2.7-fold greater than for the WT channel, suggesting that palmitoylation could regulate receptor activity by modulating the phosphorylation state of the channel.
Cys palmitoylation can directly alter channel activity. For example, voltage-gated N-type Ca2+ channels are modulated by diverse β subunits such that co-expression of the channel with CaVβ1b, CaVβ3, or CaVβ4 results in channel inhibition by either M1 or neurokinin-1 receptors, or by exogenous arachidonic acid (61, 62). Co-expression of the channel with the CaVβ2a subunit blocks neurokinin-1 receptor- or arachidonic acid-mediated inhibition. The lack of channel inhibition was dependent on palmitoylation of CaVβ2a. The voltage-dependent potassium channel Kv1.1 is palmitoylated on a cytoplasmic Cys within the S2–S3 linker domain. Blocking palmitoylation with a Cys mutation reduced voltage sensing by the channel. Palmitoylation may also enhance surface expression of Kv1.1 (42).
Cys palmitoylation alters the activity of voltage-dependent Kv1.5 channels by affecting their trafficking (42, 64). Kv1.5 is palmitoylated on its cytosolic C terminus at one site (64). Channels with a Cys mutation exhibited enhanced surface expression due to a slower rate of internalization but exhibited no change in the voltage dependence of channel activation. The ATP-gated cationic P2X7 channel is palmitoylated on multiple Cys within its cytosolic C-terminal tail. Mutation of multiple clusters of Cys found 150–250 residues away from the transmembrane domain-blocked channel palmitoylation and reduced its cell surface expression (33). The mutant P2X7 channels exhibited reduced association with detergent-resistant membrane domains, shorter half-lives, and were retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. Furthermore, Cys palmitoylation influences the ability of aquaporin-4 channels to assemble tetramers into clusters referred to as orthogonal arrays (65, 66).
Palmitoylation of ENaC Modulates Channel Gating
We used fatty acid-exchange chemistry to assess Cys palmitoylation of ENaC subunits, as our attempts to label ENaC subunits with [3H]palmitate were not successful (data not shown). Our success with the fatty acid-exchange assay likely reflects the greater sensitivity of detecting biotinylated subunits when compared with the detection of subunits labeled with [3H]palmitate. Despite the presence of multiple cytoplasmic Cys residues in each subunit, we observed palmitoylation of only the β and γ subunits. Subsequent analyses of β subunit cytoplasmic Cys mutants revealed that the two Cys residues adjacent to M1 and M2 are palmitoylated. The placement of palmitate in proximity to the transmembrane domains is consistent with sites of palmitoylation that have been described for other transmembrane proteins (29). Our results suggest that Cys palmitoylation of the β subunit does not modulate channel membrane trafficking or levels of cell surface expression. Instead, our data indicate that Cys palmitoylation has a role in modulating ENaC gating, possibly by enhancing interactions of the β subunit's cytoplasmic domains with the plasma membrane.
To understand how Cys palmitoylation of the β subunit might affect ENaC gating, we generated a model of the transmembrane domains and cytoplasmic domains of the β subunit (Fig. 7). The rotation, angle, length, and α-helical structure of the two transmembrane domains were based on the published crystal structure of ASIC1 (67). M1 includes βA50-βI71 and M2 includes βI513-βI546. We used the PROF program of cascaded multiple classifiers to predict the secondary structure of the N-terminal and C-terminal cytoplasmic domains (68). Two distinct α-helices are predicted within the β N-terminal cytoplasmic domain (βV3-R13 and βY22-C30), and one α-helix is predicted to be within the β C-terminal cytoplasmic domain (βW547-R562). Intervening sequences are predicted to be coil. The palmitoylated residue βC557 is located within the α-helix βW547-R562 adjacent to M2 (βI513-βI546), whereas palmitoylated residue βC43 is located in a loop between the second α-helix (βY22-C30) and M1 (βA50-βI71). Analysis of βW547-L560 on a helical wheel places hydrophobic residues and palmitoylated βC557 on one side and polar and charged residues primarily on the other side of the α-helix (Fig. 7). This suggests that the βW547-R562 α-helix is amphipathic and naturally associated with the membrane. Palmitoylation of βC557 would thereby enhance the hydrophobicity and membrane association of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain.
Other factors that may influence the interactions of ENaC cytoplasmic domains with the plasma membrane have also been reported to affect ENaC gating. For example, increases in levels of specific inositol phospholipids increase channel Po. These negatively charged lipids appear to enhance interactions of specific cytoplasmic domains of ENaC subunits with the plasma membrane. Deletion of the tract βK552-R563 (and a similar tract in γ, but not α) was reported to block PI3K stimulation of mouse ENaC activity by co-expression in CHO cells (23). Furthermore, deletion of the basic tract βK4-K16 at the extreme N terminus of mouse ENaC blocked both the down-regulation of channel activity in CHO cells upon depletion of membrane phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate, and the increase in Po due to application of exogenous phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate (23). The highly conserved His-Gly motif (βHG37) is found adjacent to the palmitoylation site at βC43. The His-Gly motif is conserved in α, β, and γ subunits across species (69). The βG37S mutation in human ENaC is associated with pseudohypoaldosteronism, and ENaC containing βG37S exhibits a significantly reduced Po of 0.04, compared with a Po of 0.48 for WT ENaC (69). Kellenberger et al. (70) previously reported that multiple Cys in the N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic domains, but not Cys in M1 or M2 of ENaC expressed in cut-open Xenopus oocytes, were responsible for thiol-mediated inhibition of ENaC by a variety of reagents. Because Cys palmitoylation is reversible, thiol-mediated inhibition could proceed by blocking ENaC palmitoylation. As noted above, βC557 is likely within an α-helix contiguous with M2, and palmitoylation at this site could have a direct impact on the channel pore. In support of this possibility, we found that ENaCs with a βC43A,C557A mutation had a significantly reduced Po and a significantly increased unitary conductance when compared with WT channels, indicating that palmitoylation alters the structure of the conducting pore.
Protein palmitoylation can impact protein-lipid interactions, and there are reports that ENaC is present in cholesterol-enriched lipid rafts in both amphibian A6 cells and mouse cortical collecting duct cells (10, 71). Hill et al. (10) reported that treatment of cortical collecting duct cells with apical β-cyclodextrin reduced ENaC currents by blocking constitutive apical biosynthetic delivery, but we did not observe an effect on biosynthetic delivery of ENaC in Xenopus oocytes due to mutation of βC43,C557. Alternatively, βC43 or βC557 palmitoylation could influence protein-protein interactions within the cytoplasm by altering the association or orientation of the cytoplasmic tails with the lipid bilayer, making motifs more or less available for interactions. Because we did not find that ENaC with mutant βC43A,C557A had altered membrane trafficking, it is unlikely that palmitoylation of the β subunit influences ENaC binding of Nedd4-2 at the PY motif in the C-terminal tail (Fig. 7) that regulates ENaC endocytosis and recycling at the cell surface (63). For the same reason, it is unlikely that β subunit palmitoylation affects coat protein complex II binding to αRSRYW620 and thereby ER exit (7).
Palmitoylation of the α subunit was not detected with our assay using fatty acid-exchange chemistry to assess Cys palmitoylation. However, a background level of palmitoylation was seen with the βC30A,C43A,C557A,C595A mutant (Figs. 1 and 2). It is likely that this background does not represent palmitoylation of βC10, because the βC10A mutation did not reduce levels of β subunit palmitoylation when compared with WT (Fig. 2). The background may reflect palmitoylation of residues βC61 in M1 and/or βC533 in M2. The extracellular domain of the β subunit also contains two unique Cys residues (βC182 and βC187) that are conserved in all mammalian β subunits, but not found in α or γ subunits. It is possible that βC182 and βC187 could be differentially accessible to modification with biotin in our assay. Interestingly, the βC43 residue is conserved in mammalian α and β ENaC subunits, but not in the γ subunit. Although the βC557 residue is present in mouse and rat, it is not conserved in mammalian α, β, or γ subunits. Although we did observe palmitoylation of the γ subunit, we have not yet determined the sites and functional consequences of palmitoylation of this subunit.
Our results also suggest that only 4% to 5% of the cellular pool of ENaC is modified by β subunit palmitoylation, raising the possibility that ENaC palmitoylation occurs at selected site(s) within the cell. Because mutations that prevent β subunit palmitoylation affect channel gating, it is likely that the cell surface represents one cellular compartment where channels are modified by palmitoylation. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the unitary Na+ conductance of channels that lacked β subunit palmitoylation (5.1 ± 0.1 pS) was significantly greater than that observed for WT (4.2 ± 0.1 pS). Because WT channels expressed in oocytes exhibit a consistent Na+ conductance that in our studies is ∼4 pS, it is likely that the vast majority of channels at the plasma membrane of oocytes have β subunits that are palmitoylated.
It is also notable that the Cys residues we identified as sites of β subunit palmitoylation do not appear to exert functional effects in an independent manner. Mutation of only one of the Cys residues was sufficient to reduce levels of β subunit palmitoylation to background (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we did not observe an additive effect on the reduction of ENaC currents in channels bearing mutations of βC43 or βC557, when compared with ENaC with a double mutation at βC43 and βC557. Our results suggest that preventing palmitoylation at one site by an introduced mutation may reduce palmitoylation at the second site.
In summary, we have identified sites of palmitoylation of ENaC in the cytoplasmic domains of the β subunit of ENaC. These sites are in proximity to the two transmembrane domains of ENaC. Channels with mutations that prevent β subunit palmitoylation at these two sites have reduced activity reflecting a reduced channel Po. We suggest that β subunit palmitoylation enhances interactions of ENaC cytoplasmic tails with the plasma membrane, resulting in conformation changes in the channel's pore and gate that favors the open state of the channel.
Acknowledgment
We thank Paul A. Poland for technical assistance.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants DK65161 (to T. R. K. and R. P. H.) and DK079307 (Pittsburgh Center for Kidney Research).
- ENaC
- epithelial Na+ channel
- IP
- immunoprecipitate
- Ipeak
- peak current
- Iss
- steady-state current
- M1
- first transmembrane domain
- M2
- second transmembrane domain
- maleimide-PEO2-biotin
- (+)-biotinyl-3-maleimidopropionamidyl-3,6-dioxaoctanediamine
- MDCK
- Madin-Darby canine kidney
- MTSET
- [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate bromide
- Po
- open probability
- pS
- picosiemens
- ASIC
- acid-sensing ion channel
- ER
- endoplasmic reticulum
- SSI
- Na+ self-inhibition.
REFERENCES
- 1.Chen C. C., England S., Akopian A. N., Wood J. N. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 10240–10245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jasti J., Furukawa H., Gonzales E. B., Gouaux E. (2007) Nature 449, 316–323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valentijn J. A., Fyfe G. K., Canessa C. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30344–30351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.May A., Puoti A., Gaeggeler H. P., Horisberger J. D., Rossier B. C. (1997) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8, 1813–1822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weisz O. A., Wang J. M., Edinger R. S., Johnson J. P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39886–39893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alvarez de la Rosa D., Li H., Canessa C. M. (2002) J. Gen. Physiol. 119, 427–442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mueller G. M., Kashlan O. B., Bruns J. B., Maarouf A. B., Aridor M., Kleyman T. R., Hughey R. P. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 33475–33483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hughey R. P., Mueller G. M., Bruns J. B., Kinlough C. L., Poland P. A., Harkleroad K. L., Carattino M. D., Kleyman T. R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 37073–37082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hughey R. P., Bruns J. B., Kinlough C. L., Harkleroad K. L., Tong Q., Carattino M. D., Johnson J. P., Stockand J. D., Kleyman T. R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18111–18114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hill W. G., Butterworth M. B., Wang H., Edinger R. S., Lebowitz J., Peters K. W., Frizzell R. A., Johnson J. P. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37402–37411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hughey R. P., Bruns J. B., Kinlough C. L., Kleyman T. R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 48491–48494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kleyman T. R., Carattino M. D., Hughey R. P. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 20447–20451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Passero C. J., Hughey R. P., Kleyman T. R. (2010) Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 19, 13–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ovaere P., Lippens S., Vandenabeele P., Declercq W. (2009) Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 453–463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rossier B. C., Stutts M. J. (2009) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 71, 361–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Butterworth M. B., Weisz O. A., Johnson J. P. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35305–35309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hamm L. L., Feng Z., Hering-Smith K. S. (2010) Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 19, 98–105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Butterworth M. B., Edinger R. S., Ovaa H., Burg D., Johnson J. P., Frizzell R. A. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37885–37893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ruffieux-Daidié D., Poirot O., Boulkroun S., Verrey F., Kellenberger S., Staub O. (2008) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 19, 2170–2180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Knight K. K., Olson D. R., Zhou R., Snyder P. M. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 2805–2808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pochynyuk O., Staruschenko A., Tong Q., Medina J., Stockand J. D. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 37565–37571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pochynyuk O., Tong Q., Staruschenko A., Ma H. P., Stockand J. D. (2006) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 290, F949–F957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pochynyuk O., Tong Q., Medina J., Vandewalle A., Staruschenko A., Bugaj V., Stockand J. D. (2007) J. Gen. Physiol. 130, 399–413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pochynyuk O., Bugaj V., Vandewalle A., Stockand J. D. (2008) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 294, F38–F46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yue G., Malik B., Yue G., Eaton D. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11965–11969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pochynyuk O., Tong Q., Staruschenko A., Stockand J. D. (2007) J. Physiol. 580, 365–372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fernández-Hernando C., Fukata M., Bernatchez P. N., Fukata Y., Lin M. I., Bredt D. S., Sessa W. C. (2006) J. Cell Biol. 174, 369–377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tsutsumi R., Fukata Y., Fukata M. (2008) Pflugers Arch. 456, 1199–1206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Linder M. E., Deschenes R. J. (2007) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 74–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fang C., Deng L., Keller C. A., Fukata M., Fukata Y., Chen G., Lüscher B. (2006) J. Neurosci. 26, 12758–12768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lam K. K., Davey M., Sun B., Roth A. F., Davis N. G., Conibear E. (2006) J. Cell Biol. 174, 19–25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mulugeta S., Beers M. F. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 47979–47986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gonnord P., Delarasse C., Auger R., Benihoud K., Prigent M., Cuif M. H., Lamaze C., Kanellopoulos J. M. (2009) FASEB J. 23, 795–805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qanbar R., Bouvier M. (2003) Pharmacol. Ther. 97, 1–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Valdez-Taubas J., Pelham H. (2005) EMBO J. 24, 2524–2532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yik J. H., Saxena A., Weigel J. A., Weigel P. H. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40844–40852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alvarez E., Gironès N., Davis R. J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16644–16655 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kinlough C. L., McMahan R. J., Poland P. A., Bruns J. B., Harkleroad K. L., Stremple R. J., Kashlan O. B., Weixel K. M., Weisz O. A., Hughey R. P. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 12112–12122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang X., Kovalenko O. V., Tang W., Claas C., Stipp C. S., Hemler M. E. (2004) J. Cell Biol. 167, 1231–1240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hérincs Z., Corset V., Cahuzac N., Furne C., Castellani V., Hueber A. O., Mehlen P. (2005) J. Cell Sci. 118, 1687–1692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lefkowitz R. J., Shenoy S. K. (2005) Science 308, 512–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gubitosi-Klug R. A., Mancuso D. J., Gross R. W. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 5964–5968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ahn Y. J., Brooker D. R., Kosari F., Harte B. J., Li J., Mackler S. A., Kleyman T. R. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, F121–F129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Drisdel R. C., Green W. N. (2004) BioTechniques 36, 276–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Drisdel R. C., Alexander J. K., Sayeed A., Green W. N. (2006) Methods 40, 127–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bruns J. B., Baofeng H., Ahn Y. J., Sheng S., Hughey R. P., Kleyman T. R. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 285, F600–F609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carattino M. D., Hill W. G., Kleyman T. R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 36202–36213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Carattino M. D., Sheng S., Bruns J. B., Pilewski J. M., Hughey R. P., Kleyman T. R. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 18901–18907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Snyder P. M., Olson D. R., Bucher D. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28484–28490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kashlan O. B., Mueller G. M., Qamar M. Z., Poland P. A., Ahner A., Rubenstein R. C., Hughey R. P., Brodsky J. L., Kleyman T. R. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 28149–28156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Harris M., Firsov D., Vuagniaux G., Stutts M. J., Rossier B. C. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 58–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bruns J. B., Carattino M. D., Sheng S., Maarouf A. B., Weisz O. A., Pilewski J. M., Hughey R. P., Kleyman T. R. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 6153–6160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sheng S., Carattino M. D., Bruns J. B., Hughey R. P., Kleyman T. R. (2006) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 290, F1488–F1496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carattino M. D., Sheng S., Kleyman T. R. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4393–4401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Maarouf A. B., Sheng N., Chen J., Winarski K. L., Okumura S., Carattino M. D., Boyd C. R., Kleyman T. R., Sheng S. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 7756–7765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Snyder P. M., Bucher D. B., Olson D. R. (2000) J. Gen. Physiol. 116, 781–790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Carattino M. D., Edinger R. S., Grieser H. J., Wise R., Neumann D., Schlattner U., Johnson J. P., Kleyman T. R., Hallows K. R. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 17608–17616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sheng S., McNulty K. A., Kieber-Emmons T., Kleyman T. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1326–1334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tian L., Jeffries O., McClafferty H., Molyvdas A., Rowe I. C., Saleem F., Chen L., Greaves J., Chamberlain L. H., Knaus H. G., Ruth P., Shipston M. J. (2008) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 21006–21011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pickering D. S., Taverna F. A., Salter M. W., Hampson D. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 12090–12094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Qin N., Platano D., Olcese R., Costantin J. L., Stefani E., Birnbaumer L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 4690–4695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Heneghan J. F., Mitra-Ganguli T., Stanish L. F., Liu L., Zhao R., Rittenhouse A. R. (2009) J. Gen. Physiol. 134, 369–384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Malik B., Price S. R., Mitch W. E., Yue Q., Eaton D. C. (2006) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 290, F1285–F1294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jindal H. K., Folco E. J., Liu G. X., Koren G. (2008) Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294, H2012–H2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Suzuki H., Nishikawa K., Hiroaki Y., Fujiyoshi Y. (2008) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778, 1181–1189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Crane J. M., Verkman A. S. (2009) Biophys. J. 97, 3010–3018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gonzales E. B., Kawate T., Gouaux E. (2009) Nature 460, 599–604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ouali M., King R. D. (2000) Protein Sci. 9, 1162–1176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gründer S., Firsov D., Chang S. S., Jaeger N. F., Gautschi I., Schild L., Lifton R. P., Rossier B. C. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 899–907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kellenberger S., Gautschi I., Pfister Y., Schild L. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7739–7747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hill W. G., An B., Johnson J. P. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33541–33544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]