Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1980 Oct;144(1):375–381. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.1.375-381.1980

Bacteriophages of methanotrophic bacteria.

F M Tyutikov, I A Bespalova, B A Rebentish, N N Aleksandrushkina, A S Krivisky
PMCID: PMC294658  PMID: 6774962

Abstract

Bacteriophages of methanotrophic bacteria have been found in 16 out of 88 studied samples (underground waters, pond water, soil, gas and oil installation waters, fermentor cultural fluids, bacterial paste, and rumen of cattle) taken in different geographic zones of the Soviet Union. Altogether, 23 phage strains were isolated: 10 strains that specifically lysed only Methylosinus sporium strains, 2 strains that each lysed 1 of 5 Methylosinus trichosporium strains studied, and 11 strains that lysed Flavobacterium gasotypicum and, at the same time, 1 M. sporium strain. By fine structure, the phages were divided into two types (with very short or long noncontractile tails); by host range and serological properties, they fell into three types. One-step growth characteristics of the phages differed only slightly; the latent period varied from 6 to 8 h, the rise period varied from 4 to 6 h, and the average burst size was 100. All phages had guanine- and cytosine-rich double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid consisting of common nitrogen bases. The molecular mass of the deoxyribonucleic acid as determined by restriction endonuclease analysis was 29.4 X 10(6) for M. sporium phages and 44 X 10(6) for F. gasotypicum phages. By all of the above-mentioned properties, all phages within each of the groups were completely identical to one another, but differed from phages of other groups. Bacteriophages lysing M. sporium and M. trichosporium GB2 were identical to phages M1 and M4, respectively, which were isolated earlier in the German Democratic Republic on the same methanotrophic species.

Full text

PDF
375

Images in this article

377Image
on p.377
378Image
on p.378
379Image
on p.379

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arrand J. R., Myers P. A., Roberts R. J. A new restriction endonuclease from Streptomyces albus G. J Mol Biol. 1978 Jan 5;118(1):127–135. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90249-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foster J. W., Davis R. H. A methane-dependent coccus, with notes on classification and nomenclature of obligate, methane-utilizing bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1966 May;91(5):1924–1931. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.5.1924-1931.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MARMUR J., DOTY P. Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jul;5:109–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Old R., Murray K., Boizes G. Recognition sequence of restriction endonuclease III from Hemophilus influenzae. J Mol Biol. 1975 Feb 25;92(2):331–339. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SWANSTROM M., ADAMS M. H. Agar layer method for production of high titer phage stocks. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Nov;78(2):372–375. doi: 10.3181/00379727-78-19076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharp P. A., Sugden B., Sambrook J. Detection of two restriction endonuclease activities in Haemophilus parainfluenzae using analytical agarose--ethidium bromide electrophoresis. Biochemistry. 1973 Jul 31;12(16):3055–3063. doi: 10.1021/bi00740a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith D. I., Blattner F. R., Davies J. The isolation and partial characterization of a new restriction endonuclease from Providencia stuartii. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Feb;3(2):343–353. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thomas M., Davis R. W. Studies on the cleavage of bacteriophage lambda DNA with EcoRI Restriction endonuclease. J Mol Biol. 1975 Jan 25;91(3):315–328. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90383-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Whittenbury R., Phillips K. C., Wilkinson J. F. Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1970 May;61(2):205–218. doi: 10.1099/00221287-61-2-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson G. A., Young F. E. Isolation of a sequence-specific endonuclease (BamI) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H. J Mol Biol. 1975 Sep 5;97(1):123–125. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wünsche L., Werner B., Hauche H., Kademann W. J., Hilger U., Krivisky A. S., Jessipowa W. W., Tichonenko A. S., Zimmermann I. Nachweis und erste Charakterisierung von Bakteriophagen obligat methanassimilierender Bakterien. Z Allg Mikrobiol. 1977;17(4):321–323. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3630170409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zinger A. S. Mikroflora podzemnykh vod nizhnego Povolzh'ia i vozmozhnost' ee ispol'zovaniia v neftepoiskovykh tseliakh. Mikrobiologiia. 1966 Mar-Apr;35(2):357–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES