Abstract
Here, we report that primary leukemic cells from infants with newly diagnosed B-precursor leukemia express a truncated and functionally defective CD22 coreceptor protein that is unable to transmit apoptotic signals because it lacks most of the intracellular domain, including the key regulatory signal transduction elements and all of the cytoplasmic tyrosine residues. Expression of this structurally and functionally abnormal CD22 protein is associated with a very aggressive in vivo growth of patients’ primary leukemia cells causing disseminated overt leukemia in SCID mice. The abnormal CD22 coreceptor is encoded by a profoundly aberrant mRNA arising from a splicing defect that causes the deletion of exon 12 (c.2208-c.2327) (CD22ΔE12) and results in a truncating frameshift mutation. The splicing defect is associated with multiple homozygous mutations within a 132-bp segment of the intronic sequence between exons 12 and 13. These mutations cause marked changes in the predicted secondary structures of the mutant CD22 pre-mRNA sequences that affect the target motifs for the splicing factors hnRNP-L, PTB, and PCBP that are up-regulated in infant leukemia cells. Forced expression of the mutant CD22ΔE12 protein in transgenic mice perturbs B-cell development, as evidenced by B-precursor/B-cell hyperplasia, and corrupts the regulation of gene expression, causing reduced expression levels of several genes with a tumor suppressor function. We further show that CD22ΔE12-associated unique gene expression signature is a discriminating feature of newly diagnosed infant leukemia patients. These striking findings implicate CD22ΔE12 as a previously undescribed pathogenic mechanism in human B-precursor leukemia.
CD22 is an inhibitory coreceptor of B-cells and B-cell precursors that acts as a negative regulator of multiple signal transduction pathways critical for B-cell homeostasis, survival, activation, and differentiation (1–6). The inhibitory and apoptosis-promoting signaling function of CD22 is dependent on recruitment of the Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase (SHP)-1 to the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) of its cytoplasmic domain upon phosphorylation by the Src family tyrosine kinase LYN (7–11). Collective genetic evidence from CD22-deficient or SHP-1-deficient mice as well as LYN-deficient mice shows that disruption of the LYN-CD22-SHP1 signaling network can result in development of a B-cell lymphoproliferative state associated with defective apoptosis and maturation as well as systemic autoimmunity (1, 6, 10, 12–17). Likewise, deficiency of the signaling molecule SAP (signaling lymphocyte activation molecule/SLAM-associated protein) that regulates tyrosine phosphorylation and inhibitory immunoreceptor signaling of CD22 can cause a lymphoproliferative syndrome (18). Although a physiologically important role for CD22 has been inferred by these intriguing observations in cellular and animal models, direct genetic evidence for its functional significance in human B-cell ontogeny or its implied tumor suppressor role has been lacking.
B-precursor leukemia (BPL), the largest subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), is the most common form of childhood cancer (19–21). Despite recent improvements in treatment outcome of childhood BPL, infants with BPL continue to have a disappointingly poor treatment outcome even after intensive chemotherapy and supralethal radiochemotherapy in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (22–26). Although MLL gene rearrangements have been originally thought to play the key role in the leukemogenesis and poor prognosis of infant BPL, failure of these defects to cause leukemia in transgenic or knock-in mice, absence of universal concordance of BPL in infant monozygotic twins with MLL rearrangements, and clinical biomarker studies in newly diagnosed infant BPL patients have revealed that MLL rearrangements are not sufficient to explain the leukemogenesis or aggressive biology of infant BPL (27–33). These observations support the notion that other as yet undefined molecular abnormalities contribute to the uniquely aggressive biology and poor outcome of infant BPL. Our recent analyses provided evidence that remarkably different pathognomonic transcriptomes dominate the biology of infant versus pediatric BPL (34). The antiapoptotic and promitogenic gene expression profiles of infant BPL cells prompt the hypothesis that a network of multiple constitutively active signaling pathways contribute to their prolonged life span and rapid self-renewal, thereby dictating the agressive biology and poor treatment outcome of infant BPL (8). An improved understanding of the regulatory defects that exist in leukemic B-cell precursors from infant BPL patients contributing to their hyperproliferative state as well as markedly increased apoptotic threshold may provide the foundation for therapeutic innovation against infant BPL. Because of the potential antiproliferative and apoptosis-promoting physiologic role of CD22 coreceptor in B-cell ontogeny, we set out to evaluate primary leukemic cells from infants with BPL for possible structural and functional CD22 defects. Here, we report that primary leukemic cells from infants with newly diagnosed BPL express a truncated and functionally defective CD22 coreceptor protein that is encoded by a profoundly aberrant mRNA arising from a splicing defect that causes the deletion of exon 12 (c.2208–c.2327) (CD22ΔE12). Forced expression of the mutant CD22ΔE12 protein in transgenic mice perturbs B-cell development, as evidenced by B-precursor/B-cell hyperplasia and corrupts the regulation of gene expression, causing reduced expression levels of several genes with a tumor suppressor function. These striking findings implicate CD22ΔE12 as a previously undescribed pathogenic mechanism in human B-precursor leukemia.
Results and Discussion
Because of the potential antiproliferative and apoptosis-promoting physiologic role of CD22 coreceptor in B-cell ontogeny, we set out to evaluate primary leukemic cells from infants with BPL for possible structural and functional CD22 defects. By using Western blot analyses, we detected a truncated CD22 protein in primary leukemic B-cell precursors from infant patients with newly diagnosed BPL (Fig. 1 A–C), that was not present in fetal liver-derived normal B-cell precursors or Burkitt’s leukemia/lymphoma cell lines (Fig. 1 D and E). Furthermore, while a 140 kDa intact CD22 coreceptor protein was detected in all control cell lines and primary leukemic cells from a pediatric BPL patient, no or very low levels of intact CD22 could be detected in the lysates of leukemic cells from some of the infant BPL patients (Fig. 1 A–E). To test whether the truncated CD22 coreceptor of infant BPL cells can transmit apoptotic signals, we analyzed the effects of CD22 ligation on infant BPL cells vs. control cell lines using the apoptosis-inducing HB22.7 monoclonal antibody that blocks the ligand binding site of CD22. HB22.7 induced apoptosis in DAUDI and FL8.2- cell lines that express an intact CD22 protein but not in infant BPL cells from PT1 and PT5 expressing a truncated CD22 or PT6 with negligible levels of CD22 (Fig. 1 F and G). Thus, the truncated CD22 coreceptor that is selectively expressed in infant BPL cells is functionally defective. To determine if the abnormal CD22 protein expression profile affects the in vivo biological behavior of infant BPL cells we compared the ability of primary leukemic cells from PT1, PT3, PT5, expressing a truncated CD22 and PT6, expressing very low levels of intact CD22 vs. primary leukemic cells from PT2, and PT4, expressing abundant levels of an intact CD22 in the absence of truncated CD22 to cause disseminated leukemia in a SCID mouse xenograft model of infant leukemia. While 38 of 40 SCID mice inoculated with BPL cells exhibiting an abnormal CD22 expression profile developed disseminated leukemia within 60 d, none of the 20 mice inoculated with BPL cells with a normal CD22 expression profile did (Table S1, Fishers Exact test, P < 0.0001). These results suggest that the expression of a truncated CD22 protein devoid of proapoptotic function may provide infant BPL cells with an in vivo growth and survival advantage. We hypothesized that the inability of the truncated CD22 coreceptor to deliver apoptotic signals is likely caused by genetic lesions affecting its signal transmitting transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains that are encoded by CD22 exons 11–14. To explore the genetic mechanism for the expression of a structurally and functionally defective CD22 coreceptor protein in infant BPL cells, we amplified and sequenced by PCR exons 10–14 in genomic DNA samples from primary leukemia cells of six infants with newly diagnosed BPL. Normal size PCR products were obtained in each of the six infant BPL cases, including those with truncated or near absent CD22 coreceptor protein expression, providing strong evidence against genomic deletions of these CD22 exons encoding the cytoplasmic domain as a cause for the observed expression of a truncated CD22 protein or substantially reduced expression levels of an intact protein (Fig. S1). While searching the sequences of the cloned PCR products from infant BPL patients for possible deviations from the wild-type consensus sequences, we discovered multiple homozygous mutations within a 132-bp segment of the intronic sequence between exons 12 and 13 (NC_000019.9: c.2327 + 104/G[35,836,727]-c.2328 - 195/G[35,836,859]) (but not within exon 12 or its splice acceptor/donor sites or in the intronic sequence between exons 11 and 12), including transversions/transitions, deletions, and insertions (Figs. S2 and S3 and Table S2). This “mutational hotspot” region of the CD22 gene or any of the identified mutations has not been highlighted in any of the previous reports of CD22 variations or genome-wide profiling of genetic alterations in ALL (35–39). Genomic mutations discovered in the infant BPL patients were next cross-referenced with the database of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) housed in NCBI’s Entrez system of data mining tools (dbSNP; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=snp). We queried the intronic region of interest between exons 12 and 13 of the CD22 gene (forward mRNA strand at NM_001771) and found that it contains five SNPs of unknown clinical or biologic significance, namely rs4805119, rs10406539, rs10413500, rs10413526, and rs4805120. Notably, four of four mutations in PT1, one of two mutations in PT5, and two of six mutations in PT6 were at the exact locations of these previously reported SNPs (Table S2). Five of the six mutations in PT6 and all six mutations in PT3 were unique and showed no concordance with reported SNP sites.
Fig. 1.
Infant BPL cells express a truncated CD22 receptor that does not transmit apoptotic signals. Whole cell lysates of primary leukemia cells from six infant BPL patients (PT1-PT6) and a pediatric BPL patient (PT7) (A–C) as well as RAMOS, DAUDI, FL.8.2+, and FL8.2- cell lines (D and E) were subjected to CD22 Western blot analysis using N-20 antibody recognizing the N terminus of the human CD22 molecule as well as antiactin immunoblotting. A truncated CD22 protein was detected in the lysates of leukemic cells from PT1, PT3, and PT5 but not in the lysates from the control cell lines. No significant levels of intact CD22 protein could be detected in the lysates of leukemic cells from PT5 or PT6. Cells were treated with HB22.23 anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody at the indicated concentrations to induce apoptosis via engagement of the CD22 receptor. Examination of supernatants from Triton-X-100 lysates showed apoptotic ladder-like DNA fragmentation in control FL8.2- and DAUDI cells but not in primary leukemia cells from PT1, PT5, or PT6 (F and G).
Intronic sequences often dictate the correct splicing of pre-mRNA and pathogenic intronic mutations, including single point mutations, have been linked to aberrant splicing and human disease (35–39). RNA splicing requires a complex interplay of multiple RNA-binding proteins that are equipped with domains to bind sequence motifs on single stranded RNA to ensure accurate determination of exon recognition. In silico interrogation of the wild-type pre-mRNA segment derived from the 132-bp mutation-rich intronic sequence between exons 12 and 13 for accessible splicing factor binding sites resulted in identification of multiple potential binding sites for the RNA-binding proteins hnRNP-E2/PCBP, hnRNP-I/PTB, and hnRNP-L, three members of the heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein family of splicing factors that act as global regulators of alternative splicing and are abundantly expressed in infant leukemias (40–49) (Fig. 2A.1). Using a computational secondary structure prediction algorithm we next sought to determine how the observed mutations might affect the secondary structure of the pre-mRNA corresponding to this segment and the accessibility of its target motifs for splicing factors. Sequence alignment of the pre-mRNA sequences of infant BPL patients with the consensus pre-mRNA sequence yielded only few differences (Fig. S4), but the documented mutations resulted in strikingly different secondary structure predictions (Fig. 2A.2). In particular, there were marked changes in secondary structure conformation and folding patterns that affected the target motifs for hnRNP-E2/PCBP, hnRNP-I/PTB, and hnRNP-L as well as the surrounding structural features in the predicted pre-mRNA molecules (Fig. 2 B–D). The observed impact of the intronic mutations of the predicted secondary structures of the patients’ CD22 pre-mRNA molecules prompted us to hypothesize that these mutations would likely affect the recognition of 5′ splice site of exon 12 by the splicing machinery and perturb proper splicesome assembly thereby causing aberrant pre-mRNA splicing.
Fig. 2.
Predicted secondary structures of the mutant CD22 pre-mRNA sequences in infant BPL cells. Prediction of secondary structure of the positive strand of the RNA molecule, to assess the potential for RNA binding proteins to target motifs, was achieved using the minimum free energy (MFE) calculations for sequences obtained from intronic regions between exons 12 and 13 (RNAfold, provided by the Vienna RNA package). (A.1) The folded structure for the wild-type sequence with the target motifs for the splicing factors hnRNP-L, PTB, and PCBP. The positions of the misalignments caused by genomic mutations for each patient are indicated by the arrow symbols [alignments performed using the Clust W algorithm (Bioedit Sequence alignment editor)]. The misalignments occur in the RNA helix portion of the wild-type folded structure and lead to marked changes in the predicted secondary structure for three of the patients with complete sequences in the intronic region (A2; PT1, PT5, PT6). (A.2) Whereas the wild-type secondary structure contained 11 hairpin loops, 2 bulges, 6 multibranched loops, and 8 internal loops in the RNA helix, there were 9 hairpin loops, 4 bulges, 5 multibranched loops, and 11 internal loops in PT1 secondary structure; 10 hairpin loops, 3 bulges, 6 multibranched loops, and 10 internal loops in PT5 secondary structure; and 7 hairpin loops, 3 bulges, 5 multibranched loops, and 14 internal loops in PT6 structure. (B.1 and B.2) The CACA binding motif for hnRNP-L appeared at a base of a multibranched loop comprised of two hairpin loops in wild-type and PT5 pre-mRNA, while this motif was sequestered between an internal loop and a multibranched loop through formation of a double strand between CAC and GUG complementary pairs in pre-mRNA from PT1 and PT6. A second loop structure with an ACAC binding motif showed open access in a hairpin loop structure from wild-type and PT5 pre-mRNA and apparent potential for steric hindrance adjacent to a region with an internal loop and a bulge in pre-mRNA from PT1 and PT6. (C.1 and C.2) A PTB-binding site UCU showed two bases in a hairpin loop structure of wild-type pre-mRNA. Notably, in PT1 and PT6 all three bases appear within the hairpin loop at the end of a stem with 10 base pairs making this motif more accessible for PTB binding. An alternative PTP-binding site (viz.: CCU) formed a junction between a multibranched loop and a stem in wild-type pre-mRNA and PT5 pre-mRNA, but in the other two patients the GGG is double-stranded making this motif inaccessible to protein binding. (D.1 and D.2) There were two binding sites for PCBP that exhibited variation in the binding site accessibility and surrounding structural conformations for the wild-type and patient sequences. In one motif, the multibranched portion of the double hairpin loop structure contained a triple C site and the junction with the helix contained the quadruple C site with low base-pair binding probabilities in the wild type, whereas the patient secondary structures showed complex folding patterns that resulted in close proximities of adjacent stem-loop structures that could potentially hinder PCBP binding events. The second binding site for PCBP was found in a bulge portion that also contained a single stem-loop structure. This site contained 5 Cs in the wild-type and PT5 RNA sequences, whereas in PT1 and PT6 this bulge region collapsed making the motif inaccessible to binding.
In order to test this hypothesis, we performed RT-PCR assays that specifically amplified a 975-bp region of CD22 mRNA (c.1801–c.2776) encompassing exons 11–14 encoding the entire cytoplasmic domain of CD22 (Fig. S5A). RT-PCR analysis of fetal liver-derived normal B-precursor cell line FL8.2- showed the anticipated 975-bp single PCR product, whereas infant BPL cells yielded a smaller second PCR product of approximately 850-bp size as well (Fig. S5B). Both PCR products hybridized to a CD22 exon 11-specific oligonucleotide probe (Fig. S5C). To pursue this result further we performed EcoRI restriction analysis of cloned CD22 RT-PCR products. FL8.2- cells yielded two fragments of the expected sizes of 600-bp and 350-bp (Fig. S5D). In contrast, EcoRI restriction analysis of cloned CD22 RT-PCR products from primary infant BPL cells yielded abnormal fragment pairs of 500-bp (instead of 600-bp) + 350-bp in the majority of the clones (Fig. S5 E and F). These findings indicate that the truncated CD22 coreceptor in infant BPL cells is the product of abnormal CD22 mRNA species. Sequence analysis of the RT-PCR products demonstrated that the smaller approximately 850-bp RT-PCR product in infant BPL cells results from a profoundly aberrant coding sequence due to a splicing defect causing the deletion of exon 12 (c.2208–c.2327) (Fig. S5 G and H). This exon skipping (CD22ΔE12) involves an exact splice with no other mutation at the splice junction. CD22ΔE12 was not detected in normal B-precursor cells (Table S3). A minority of PCR clones from adult hairy cell leukemia (HCL) patients and a single clone from a pediatric BPL patient also harbored CD22ΔE12 (Table S3). We propose that the mutations within the downstream intronic sequence flanking exon 12 of CD22 gene contribute to the observed splicing defect in infant BPL cells by altering the genomic sequence environment for the exon 12 splice sites and influencing their recognition by the pre-mRNA splicing machinery. The observation that some infant BPL cases had very low levels of CD22 protein expression also suggests that these mutations may adversely affect pre-mRNA stability and efficiency of transcription in some cases. The deletion of exon 12 in CD22 mRNA results in a truncating frameshift mutation starting at K736 with an insertion of 15 amino acids (RCRVLRDAETSPGLR) not seen in wild-type CD22 sequence followed by a TGA termination codon (Fig. S5I). Wild-type CD22 has 14 exons, exons 3–9 each encode a single Ig domain, exon 10 encodes the transmembrane domain, whereas the cytoplasmic tail is encoded by exons 11–14 (50). Mutant CD22ΔE12 protein lacks the conserved tyrosines and ITIMs that provide docking sites for the SH2 domains of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP1 (7–11). It also lacks regions homologous to ITAMs, tyrosine-based activation motifs, which are docking sites for SH2 containing proteins (7–11). An YXXM motif recognized by the N-terminal SH2 domain of the p85 subunit of PI3-kinase (7–11) is also located within the deleted cytoplasmic portion of CD22ΔE12. Thus, CD22ΔE12 mRNA encodes a truncated CD22 protein lacking most of the intracellular domain including the key regulatory signal transduction elements and all of the cytoplasmic tyrosine residues, which is in agreement with the results of Western blot analyses and apoptosis assays of infant BPL cells (depicted in Fig. 1). To further examine the functional significance of the exon 12 splicing defect for B-lineage lymphoid cells, we forced the expression of human CD22ΔE12 in transgenic mice under control of the immunoglobulin enhancer Eμ that is activated in early B-cell ontogeny prior to Ig gene rearrangements (Fig. S6). At six weeks of age, hCD22ΔE12 transgenic mice showed flow cytometric evidence for B-precursor/B-cell hyperplasia (Fig. 3A). To examine the deregulatory biologic effects of the expression of the defective CD22ΔE12 protein at a molecular level, we compared the gene expression profiles of splenocytes from hCD22ΔE12 transgenic mice and nontransgenic wild-type control mice. Twelve differentially expressed genes that had standardized values of expression outside the range of the control values in wild-type mice were classified as the most discriminating genes. This CD22ΔE12-associated unique 12-gene signature transcriptome included (i) tumor suppressor genes TP53 (as well as TP53 regulator MDM2), neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) (as well as NF2 regulator RAC1), and the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, a tumor suppressor known to regulate the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling; (ii) genes for chromatin remodeling/global gene expression regulators with a tumor suppressor function IKZF1/IKAROS and SATB1; as well as (iii) cell cycle regulatory genes CDKN1C, CCNG1, and NOTCH4 (Fig. 4 B and D). These results provide compelling evidence that CD22ΔE12 corrupts the regulation of gene expression and results in reduced expression levels of several genes that have a tumor suppressor function. We next performed gene expression profiling of primary leukemia cells from 31 infants and 30 noninfant children with ALL to determine if any of these signature genes are differentially expressed in infant ALL vs. pediatric ALL. Reduced expression levels of six of the nine CD22ΔE12 signature genes that were represented on the human cDNA arrays, including TP53 and APC as well as MDM2, SATB1, CCNG1, and GNB2 discriminated infant BPL from noninfant BPL (Fig. 3 C.1 and D). Comparing the gene expression profiles of CD10 antigen positive infant leukemia cells that do not have MLL gene rearrangements with those of CD10+ pediatric ALL cells, we next confirmed that this signature transcriptome was independent of MLL gene rearrangements (Fig. 3 C.2 and D). We next used a meta-analysis to interrogate each of the most discriminating signature genes with significant T-test statistics (viz., APC, GNB2, MDM2, and SATB1) for its previously reported expression values and associations in 10 B-lineage leukemia studies with 11 comparative analyses and 5 B-lineage lymphoma studies with 15 comparative analyses in the OncomineTM Research Data Base (51). Each of these genes was expressed in malignant cells from patients with B-lineage lymphoid malignancies at significantly lower levels than in normal B-cell controls (Table S4). Among these, the down-regulation of SATB1 was the most pronounced as well as the most enriched aberration suggesting a potentially more critical role in leukemogenesis (Table S4). The key target for SATB1 activity, MYC oncogene, is a master regulator of multiple interacting genes in B-cell ontogeny (52), and its forced expression driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces aggressive B-lineage lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice (53). SATB1 represses the expression of MYC in lymphoid cells (54), and its down-regulation in infant pro-B ALL cells with a CD22ΔE12 would be expected to cause an overexpression of MYC. Notably, our recent gene expression profiling studies have indeed revealed that MYC is expressed at 7.8-fold higher levels in CD10- poor-risk pro-B subset of infant ALL patients than in patients with CD10+ infant pre-pre-B ALL (P = 0.0006) (34). The documented molecular and functional abnormalities involving CD22 in primary leukemic cells from patients with newly diagnosed infant BPL uniquely implicate deficiency of this B-lineage restricted coreceptor protein in the genesis of infant leukemia. The presented collection of experimental data is unprecedented in that it links a genetic defect involving a B-lineage specific regulatory gene to the most aggressive human B-lineage lymphoid malignancy that arises from an uncoupling of proliferation and differentiation of B-precursors during the earliest stages of B-cell ontogeny. A key challenge in the future will be to decipher the precise molecular mechanism by which the genetic CD22ΔE12 defect contributes to the clonal evolution and aggressive biology of infant BPL. The very young age of infant patients who express CD22ΔE12, ranging from 1 month to 6 months, points to a prenatal or very early neonatal origin for this genetic defect. Concordance of infant BPL in monozygotic twins indicates a shared inherited or genetic susceptibility (55). Homozygosity for a cluster of potentially predisposing SNPs corresponding to the synonymous mutations in the intronic segment between CD22 exons 12 and 13 may confer a genetic risk for development of infant BPL. We are planning to undertake a genome-wide association study to address the important question of whether the presence of these SNPs alone or in clusters confers a genuine genetic risk for development of infant BPL. Dissecting the contribution of CD22ΔE12 to infant BPL leukemogenesis should provide valuable mechanistic insights and help determine if this genetic lesion can be used to gain a therapeutic advantage against infant leukemia. Because the CD22ΔE12-associated signature transcriptome was independent of MLL gene rearrangements (Fig. 3), the well established clinical impact of MLL gene rearrangements in infant ALL indicates that nonoverlapping aberrations in addition to those caused by CD22ΔE12, such as the presence of MLL-AF4 fusion protein, can affect the biology and treatment response of infant ALL as independent risk factors. It will be important to perform a systems analysis of the likely cooperation between CD22ΔE12 and MLL fusion proteins in the leukemogenesis of infant ALL using both appropriately designed knock-in and bitransgenic mouse models.
Fig. 3.
B-precursor/B-lymphocyte hyperplasia and unique gene expression signature of CD22ΔE12 transgenic mice. (A) The B220+ (23.0 ± 2.2 × 106/spleen vs. 16.2 ± 1.8 × 106/spleen, T-test P = 0.042; 32.9 ± 4.7 × 106/bone marrow from 2 femurs vs. 19.9 ± 0.9 × 106/bone marrow from 2 femurs, T-test P-value = 0.026) total B-lineage lymphoid cell numbers as well as B220+slgM- B-precursor numbers (5.3 ± 0.5 × 106/spleen vs. 3.6 ± 0.3 × 106/spleen, T-test P-value = 0.017; 20.8 ± 3.1 × 106/bone marrow from 2 femurs vs. 15.0 ± 0.8 × 106/bone marrow from 2 femurs, T-test P-value = 0.1) in the spleen as well as bone marrow were moderately elevated in hCD22ΔE12 transgenic mice as compared to control FVB mice. Likewise, there were more CD19+ B-lineage lymphoid cells in the bone marrows of hCD22ΔE12-Tg mice than in control mice (29.7 ± 4.5 × 106 vs. 18.0 ± 1.4 × 106, P = 0.038). (B) Gene expression profiles of hCD22ΔE12-Tg mouse splenocytes. Mean centered, standardized values for the most discriminating 12 signature genes (rows) across the 7 hCD22ΔE12-Tg and 3 control FVB mice (columns) were subjected to hierarchical clustering. The heat map represents the color-coded expression value reported as standard deviation units (SD) relative to the average expression levels across 10 mice. (C.1) Of the 12 down-regulated signature genes, 9 were represented on the human Clontech array and 6 of these 9 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes for patients with infant ALL vs. pediatric noninfant ALL. (C.2) Gene expression profiles were also compared for CD10+ infant vs. pediatric ALL patients and showed that 5 of the 9 signature genes were down-regulated in infant patients. (D) Differential expression of the hCD22ΔE12-associated signature genes in transgenic mice and infant ALL patients.
The expression of CD22 on leukemic B-cell precursors has motivated the development and clinical testing of CD22-directed recombinant fusion toxins and antibody-drug conjugates as therapeutic agents against BPL in children (56–59). The toxin or drug moieties of these biotherapeutic agents are delivered into target leukemia cells together with the targeted CD22 molecules by antibody-mediated endocytosis (56–59). Antibody-mediated internalization of CD22 is dependent on its physical interaction with the clathrin-associated AP-2 adapter complex via tyrosine-based specific internalization motifs within its cytoplasmic domain (59, 60). Tyr843 or Tyr863 and surrounding amino acids in the cytoplasmic tail of CD22 comprise the primary binding site for the AP50 subunit of AP-2 (60, 61). Therefore, indiscriminate use of anti-CD22 fusion toxins and immunoconjugates would not offer an effective treatment opportunity for BPL with CD22ΔE12 lacking the internalization motifs required for their antileukemic action. Our findings provide strong support for the consideration that anti-CD22 fusion toxins and immunoconjugates be employed in a patient-tailored fashion, and in this context, CD22ΔE12 be used as a biomarker for exclusion of BPL patients who are not likely to benefit from these otherwise promising new biotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, antisense oligonucletides can now be designed as an innovative strategy with therapeutic intent to shift the CD22 splicing pattern by preventing exclusion of exon 12 in the CD22 mRNA by targeting and sterically blocking the splice site boundaries flanking exon 12, similar to the modification of MCL-1 pre-mRNA splicing in basal cell carcinoma cells (62).
Materials and Methods
In Vitro Assays.
We used standard assays and procedures, including Western blot analyses, apoptosis assays, gene expression profiling, RT-PCR, and genomic PCR (13, 27, 28, 34) (SI Text).
hCD22ΔE12 Transgenic Mice.
The hCD22ΔE12 transgene construct was microinjected into the male pronucleus of fertilized FVB/N mouse oocytes using standard protocols (SI Text). The oocytes were implanted into the oviducts of pseudopregnant female mice to generate hCD22ΔE12-Tg mice. Tg mice were subjected to detailed characterization to confirm the transgene expression (SI Text). Single-cell suspensions of splenocytes and bone marrow cells obtained from electively sacrificed 6–7 wk old Tg mice and their wild-type controls were immunophenotyped by direct fluorescence staining and flow cytometry using anti-CD19-phycoerythrin (PE), anti-B220/CD45R-PE, and anti-IgM-FITC (SI Text).
SCID Mouse Model of Infant BPL.
SCID mice were inoculated intravenously with 1 × 106 primary infant BPL cells. All SCID mice were electively killed at 60 d unless they died or became moribund earlier due to their disseminated leukemia (SI Text).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Dr. J. Kehrl (National Institutes of Health, MD) for HB22.23 antibody, Dr. F. Rajemohan (Parker Hughes Institute, MN) for assistance in the preparation of the hCD22ΔE12 transgene construct and helpful discussions, Dr. J.B. Wilson (Glasgow University, United Kingdom) for pEμ(Py), and Dr. J. Frelinger (University of Rochester, NY) for pKV-461 plasmid containing SV40 poly(A) sequences. We further thank all members of the Uckun lab for their many invaluable technical assistance and contributions, but especially Mrs. K. Hatten-Herman for RT-PCR assays, Ms. L. Crotty for gene expression profiling, Ms. T. M. Ceperich for dual color FISH analysis of hCD22ΔE12 gene localization on transgenic mouse chromosomes, Ms. D. Schonhoff and Ms. L. Niehoff for Southern blot and PCR analyses of transgenic mice, and M. Cetkovic for immunophenotyping of transgenic mouse bone marrow cells and splenocytes. This research was funded in part by Parker Hughes Trust and endowment funds of the Hughes Chair in Molecular Oncology at Parker Hughes Institute, and a William Lawrence & Blanche Hughes Foundation grant.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
Data deposition: The CD22 gene sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. HQ225617, HQ225618, HQ225619, and HQ225620) and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory database (accession nos. FR687955, FR687956, FR687957, and FR687958). A GEOarchive containing the gene expression profiling data from CD22ΔE12 transgenic mice was submitted to GEO (accession no. GSE23998). A GEOarchive file containing the gene expression profiling data from ALL patients has been submitted to GEO ( accession nos. GSE24000 and GSE24001).
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1007896107/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Chaouchi N, Vazquez A, Galanaud P, Leprince C. B cell antigen receptor-mediated apoptosis. Importance of accessory molecules CD19 and CD22, and of surface IgM cross-linking. J Immunol. 1995;154:3096–3104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Doody GM, et al. A role in B cell activation for CD22 and the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP. Science. 1995;269:242–244. doi: 10.1126/science.7618087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sato S, et al. CD22 is both a positive and negative regulator of B lymphocyte antigen receptor signal transduction: altered signaling in CD22-deficient mice. Immunity. 1996;5:551–62. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80270-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stoddart A, Ray RJ, Paige CJ. Analysis of murine CD22 during B cell development: CD22 is expressed on B cell progenitors prior to IgM. Int Immunol. 1997;9:1571–1579. doi: 10.1093/intimm/9.10.1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tuscano JM, Riva A, Toscano SN, Tedder TF, Kehrl JH. CD22 cross-linking generates B-cell antigen receptor-independent signals that activate the JNK/SAPK signaling cascade. Blood. 1999;94:1382–1392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tedder TF, Poe JC, Haas KM. CD22: A multifunctional receptor that regulates B lymphocyte survival and signal transduction. Adv Immunol. 2005;88:1–50. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(05)88001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Songyang Z, et al. SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell. 1993;72:767–78. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90404-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Law CL, et al. CD22 associates with protein tyrosine phosphatase 1C, Syk, and phospholipase C-gamma(1) upon B cell activation. J Exp Med. 1996;183:547–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.2.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tuscano JM, Engel P, Tedder TF, Agarwal A, Kehrl JH. Involvement of p72syk kinase, p53/56lyn kinase and phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase in signal transduction via the human B lymphocyte antigen CD. Eur J Immunol. 1996;26:1246–52. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cornall RJ, et al. Polygenic autoimmune traits: Lyn, CD22 and SHP-1 are limiting elements of a biochemical pathway regulating BCR signaling and selection. Immunity. 1998;8:497–508. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80554-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blasioli J, Paust S, Thomas ML. Definition of the sites of interaction between the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 and CD. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2303–2307. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tybulewicz VLJ. Analysis of antigen receptor signalling using mouse gene targeting. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:195–204. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tsui HW, Siminovitch KA, de Souza L, Tsui FW. Motheaten and viable motheaten mice have mutations in the haematopoietic cell phosphatase gene. Nat Genet. 1993;4:124–129. doi: 10.1038/ng0693-124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hibbs ML, et al. Multiple defects in the immune system of Lyn-deficient mice, culminating in autoimmune disease. Cell. 1995;83:301–311. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90171-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.O'Keefe TL, Williams GT, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Hyperresponsive B cells in CD22-deficient mice. Science. 1996;274:798–801. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Otipoby KL, et al. CD22 regulates thymus-independent responses and the lifespan of B cells. Nature. 1996;384:634–7. doi: 10.1038/384634a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang J, Koizumi T, Watanabe T. Altered antigen receptor signaling and impaired Fas-mediated apoptosis of B cells in Lyn-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 1996;184:831–838. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.3.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ostrakhovitch EA, Wang Y, Li SS. SAP binds to CD22 and regulates B cell inhibitory signaling and calcium flux. Cell Signal. 2009;21:540–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Trigg ME, et al. Ten-year survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2008;49:1142–54. doi: 10.1080/10428190802074593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seibel NL, et al. Early postinduction intensification therapy improves survival for children and adolescents with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Chilren’s Oncology Group. Blood. 2008;111:2548–2555. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-070342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stanulla M, Schrappe M. Treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2009;46(1):52–63M. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reaman GH, et al. Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia on two consecutive trials of the Children’s Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:445–455. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chessels JM, Harrison CJ, Watson SL, Vora AJ, Richards SM. Treatment of infants with lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of the UK Infant Protocols 1987–1999. Brit J Haematol. 2002;117:306–314. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kosaka Y, et al. Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia with MLL gene rearrangements: outcome following intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;104:3527–3534. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hilden JM, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants: Report on CCG 1953 from the Children’s Oncology Group. Blood. 2006;108:441–451. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-3011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tomizawa D, et al. Outcome of recurrent or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants with MLL gene rearrangements: A report from the Japan Infant Leukemia Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;52:808–13. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Uckun FM, et al. Clinical significance of MLL-AF4 fusion transcript expression in the absence of a cytogenetically detectable t (4; 11)(q21; q23) chromosomal translocation. Blood. 1998;92:810–821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun L, et al. Expression of dominant-negative and mutant isoforms of the antileukemic transcription factor Ikaros in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:680–685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Russell T, et al. Differential expression of Ikaros isoforms in monozygotic twins with MLL-rearranged precursor-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediat Hematol Onc. 2008;30:941–4. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318180bbf5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yamaguchi H, et al. Multistep pathogenesis of leukemia via the MLL-AF4 chimeric gene/Flt3 gene tyrosine kinase domain (TKD)-mutation-related enhancement of S100A6 expression. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:701–714. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brassesco MS, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of MLL rearrangements in acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors. Mutagenesis. 2009;24:153–60. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gen063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zuna J, et al. Covert preleukemia driven by MLL gene fusion. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009;48:98–107. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chuk MK, McIntyre E, Small D, Brown P. Discordance of MLL-rearranged (MLL-R) infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia in monozygotic twins with spontaneous clearance of preleukemic clone in unaffected twin. Blood. 2009;113:6691–6694. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-202259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qazi S, Uckun FM. Gene expression profiles of infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and its prognostically distinct subsets. Brit J Haematol. 2010;149:865–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hatta Y, et al. Identification of the gene variations in human CD22. Immunogenetics. 1999;49:280–286. doi: 10.1007/s002510050494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447:661–678. doi: 10.1038/nature05911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kawamata N, et al. Molecular allelokaryotyping of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemias by high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism oligonucleotide genomic microarray. Blood. 2008;111:776–784. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miyagawa H, et al. Association of polymorphisms in complement component C3 gene with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology. 2008;47(2):158–64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mullighan CG, Downing JR. Genome-wide profiling of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: recent insights and future directions. Leukemia. 23:1209–1218. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Venables JP. Aberrant and alternative splicing in cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7647–7654. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hui J, et al. Intronic CA-repeat and CA-rich elements: a new class of regulators of mammalian alternative splicing. EMBO J. 2005;24:1988–1998. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baralle D, Baralle M. Splicing in action: assessing disease causing sequence changes. J Med Genet. 2005;42:737–748. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.029538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Venables JP, et al. Multiple and specific mRNA processing targets for the major human hnRNP proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:6033–6043. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00726-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hung L, et al. Diverse roles of hnRNP L in mammalian mRNA processing: A combined microarray and RNAi analysis. RNA. 2008;14:284–296. doi: 10.1261/rna.725208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang Z, Burge CB. Splicing regulation: From a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code. RNA. 2008;14:802–813. doi: 10.1261/rna.876308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pomares E, et al. Identification of an intronic single-point mutation in RP2 as the cause of semidominant X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. IOVS. 2009;50:5107–5114. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Davis RL, Homer VM, George PM, Brennan SO. A deep intronic mutation in FGB creates a consensus exonic splicing enhancer motif that results in afibrinogenemia caused by aberrant mRNA splicing, which can be corrected in vitro with antisense oligonucleotide treatment. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:221–227. doi: 10.1002/humu.20839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fogel BL, Lee JY, Perlman S. Aberrant splicing of the senataxin gene in a patient with ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2. Cerebellum. 2009;8:448–453. doi: 10.1007/s12311-009-0130-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Galante PAF, et al. Sandhu D, et al., editors. A comprehensive in silico expression analysis of RNA binding proteins in normal and tumor tissue: Identification of potential players in tumor formation. RNA Biol. 2009;6:426–433. doi: 10.4161/rna.6.4.8841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wilson GL, et al. Genomic structure and chromosomal mapping of the human CD22 Gene. J Immunol. 1993;150:5013–5024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rhodes DR, et al. Oncomine 3.0: Genes, pathways, and networks in a collection of 18,000 cancer gene expression profiles. Neoplasia. 2007;9:166–180. doi: 10.1593/neo.07112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang K, et al. Genome-wide identification of post-translational modulators of transcription factor activity in human B cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:829–839. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Adams JM, et al. The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice. Nature. 1985;318:533–538. doi: 10.1038/318533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Seo J, Lozano MM, Dudley JP. Nuclear maxtrix binding regulates SATB1-mediated transcriptional repression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:24600–24609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414076200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Greaves MF, Maia AT, Wiemels JL, Ford AM. Leukemia in twins: Lessons in natural history. Blood. 2003;102:2321–2333. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kreitman RJ. Recombinant immunotoxins containing truncated bacterial toxins for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. BioDrugs. 2009;23(1):1–13. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200923010-00001. 10.2165/00063030-200923010-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wayne AS, et al. Anti-CD22 immunotoxin RFB4(dsFv)-PE38 (BL22) for CD22-positive hematologic malignancies of childhood: preclinical studies and phase I clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1894–903. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Takeshita A, et al. CMC-544 (inotuzumab ozogamicin), an anti-CD22 immuno-conjugate of calicheamicin, alters the levels of target molecules of malignant B-cells. Leukemia. 2009;23:1329–36. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Quintás-Cardama A, Wierda W, O'Brien S. Investigational immunotherapeutics for B-cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:884–92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chan CT, Wang J, French RR, Glennie MJ. Internalization of the lymphocytic surface protein CD22 is controlled by a novel membrane proximal cytoplasmic motif. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27809–27815. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.43.27809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.John B, et al. The B cell coreceptor CD22 associates with AP50, a clathrin-coated pit adapter protein, via tyrosine-dependent interaction. J Immunol. 2003;170:3534–43. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shieh JJ, Liu KT, Huang SW, Chen YJ, Hsieh TY. Modification of alternative splicing of Mcl-1 pre-mRNA using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides induces apoptosis in basal cell carcinoma cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:2497–2506. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



