Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent age-associated disease involving altered chondrocyte homeostasis and cartilage degeneration. The avascular nature of cartilage and the altered chondrocyte phenotype characteristic of OA severely limit the capacity for in vivo tissue regeneration. Cell- and tissue-based repair has the potential to revolutionize treatment of OA, but those approaches have exhibited limited clinical success to date. In this study, we test the hypothesis that bovine and human chondrocytes in a collagen type I scaffold will form hyaline cartilage ex vivo with immunohistochemical, biochemical, and magnetic resonance (MR) endpoints similar to the original native cartilage. Chondrocytes were isolated from 1- to 3-week-old calf knee cartilage or from cartilage obtained from human total knee arthroplasties, suspended in 2.7 mg/mL collagen I, and plated as 300 μL spot cultures with 5 × 106 each. Medium formulations were varied, including the amount of serum, the presence or absence of ascorbate, and treatments with cytokines. Bovine chondrocytes generated metachromatic territorial and interstitial matrix and accumulated type II collagen over time. Type VI collagen was confined primarily to the pericellular region. The ex vivo–formed bovine cartilage contained more chondroitin sulfate per dry weight than native cartilage. Human chondrocytes remained viable and generated metachromatic territorial matrix, but were unable to support interstitial matrix accumulation. MR analysis of ex vivo–formed bovine cartilage revealed evidence of progressively maturing matrix, but MR-derived indices of tissue quality did not reach those of native cartilage. We conclude that the collagen-spot culture model supports formation and maturation of three-dimensional hyaline cartilage from active bovine chondrocytes. Future studies will focus on determining the capacity of human chondrocytes to show comparable tissue formation.
Introduction
Tissue engineering of cartilage constructs is an area of active investigation, motivated by the potential for routine generation of functional human articular cartilage ex vivo to provide a novel and highly effective mode of treatment for degenerative cartilage defects. The methodologies to support the ex vivo formation of cartilage include bioreactors,1,2 alginate beads and other scaffold-based systems,3–5 and suspension culture.6 However, regeneration of three-dimensional cartilage from human chondrocytes remains a challenge, most likely owing to the limited regenerative capacity of the articular chondrocytes obtained from arthroplasty. Stimulating these chondrocytes to re-synthesize extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and assemble them into a correctly organized and biomechanically functional cartilage will most likely require a complex strategy, including growth factor provision and possibly application of mechanical stimulus. However, some success with human cells has been reported. Chondrocytes from a 14-year-old girl suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) after meniscectomy were suspended in a collagen I matrix and incubated in the culture medium for 3 weeks, after which time the construct was implanted into the girl's femoral defect. Arthroscopy performed 1 year after surgery revealed full integration of the construct into the surrounding tissue.7 A similar ex vivo model system is employed in the present study to assess potential tissue formation as compared to native tissue.
With the inherent difficulties involved in stimulating aged and/or diseased human chondrocytes to re-synthesize ECM, the study of readily available and easily replicable animal models will be essential toward the development of tissue regeneration protocols using human cells. Of course, animal models such as cows, rabbits, and mice do not exhibit the same amount of physiological loading that is experienced in human knee articular cartilage, and loading has been shown to stimulate ECM synthesis and secretion.8 Mechanical stimulation of ex vivo–generated human cartilage may become an essential component for successfully engineering cartilage constructs. However, the generation of animal models for basic research remains important. Studies with both embryonic chick sternal chondrocytes1,9,10 and bovine articular chondrocytes, as a mammalian source,8,11,12 have been reported.
Noninvasive analysis of ex vivo–developing constructs permits ongoing evaluation of tissue regeneration protocols. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measures reflect a variety of tissue characteristics. Those most commonly used include (1) T2, which reflects overall macromolecular content; (2) the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and rate, which is particularly sensitive to tissue collagen content; and (3) the derived fixed charge density (FCD), which reflects proteoglycan (PG) content. Characterization of scaffold-free engineered cartilage constructs using these MR parameters has already been reported.1,9 The aims of the present work were to directly compare MR endpoints along with additional biochemical and protein markers between native cartilage explants and scaffold-based tissue-engineered constructs. Our hypothesis was that bovine and human chondrocytes in a collagen type I scaffold would form hyaline cartilage ex vivo with immunohistochemical, biochemical, and MR endpoints similar to the original native cartilage.
Materials and Methods
Isolation of native cartilage samples
All studies involving human tissue were approved by the NEOUCOM IRB. Human cartilage samples were isolated from tibial plateaus and femoral condyles of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty within 3 h of surgery (patient n = 22, average age 67.2 years). Cells from these samples were used to generate spot cultures (SCs), with tissue from two to five patients pooled before cell isolation to maximize yield. Healthy, non-OA knee cartilage isolated from patients found to have chondro- and osteosarcomas, along with hip and ankle cartilage resected secondary to nondegenerative diseases such as alcoholism and amputation caused by fracture, were taken as normal cartilage (patient n = 11, average age 42.4 years) for comparison with the SCs. Owing to the limited number of patients and the number of cells acquired, normal patients were not used as a source of chondrocytes for SCs. All human SCs were generated from cartilage isolated from total knee arthroplasties due to degenerative cartilage defects. Bovine knees of 1–3-week-old Holstein calves were transported from the slaughterhouse (Mahan Packing Co., Bristolville, OH) in Betadine and on ice to maintain sterility and tissue viability. Articular cartilage was dissected from the femoral condyles and tibial plateaus, and placed in phosphate-buffered saline with 100 μg/mL Primocin (Invivogen, San Diego, CA) on ice.
Generation of bovine and human SCs
The human or bovine cartilage was minced and digested in 4% collagenase (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) in Hank's balanced salt solution (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) with 100 μg/mL Primocin overnight at 37°C for chondrocyte isolation. Collagen I solution (rat tail tendon; BD Biosciences 354236) was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions at 2.7 mg/mL. Chondrocytes were suspended without expansion in monolayer in the collagen I solution at 5 × 106 cells per 300 μL collagen (1.67 × 107 cells/mL) and plated into 100 mm2 tissue culture dishes to form the SCs. Preliminary data not shown here indicated that SCs with high concentrations of chondrocytes resulted in greater tissue formation than SCs seeded with lower concentrations of cells. The collagen in the hydrogel gelatinized after approximately 10 min at 37°C, after which time the medium was applied. SCs were incubated at 37°C in Opti-MEM I Reduced-Serum Medium or Ham's F-12 (Gibco). As indicated in the figure legends, SCs were incubated at 37°C in Opti-MEM I Reduced-Serum medium alone or with one of the following: 50 μg/mL ascorbate, 10 ng/mL tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and 10 ng/mL interleukin-1β (IL-1β). In separate studies the SCs were incubated with Hams F-12 medium with either 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) or 10% FBS. Distinct sets of SCs were evaluated at 24 h intervals over the first 7 days of culture, and then after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of growth, to assess the characteristics of the developing tissue.
Cytokine experimental design
The effects of cytokine treatment on ex vivo–generated cartilage were evaluated through the following groups of SCs. First, a set of SCs was allowed to develop under control conditions for 3 weeks and then treated for 1 week with the medium containing 10 ng/mL IL-1β and 10 ng/mL TNF-α. This group was sacrificed immediately after cytokine exposure to determine the direct effect of cytokines on ECM composition, and is designated “No Recovery.” Second, to determine the chondrocyte capacity for ECM recovery after cytokine-induced matrix degradation, an additional set of SCs were subjected to the same conditions as above (3 weeks of growth followed by 1 week of cytokine treatment), with the cytokine-containing medium then being replaced by the control medium for an additional 2 weeks of growth (designated “2wk Recovery”). Finally, for comparison, SCs were maintained in the control medium for 4 and 6 weeks as controls.
Both ex vivo and native cartilage were analyzed in a similar manner as described in the following sections.
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue samples were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), processed, and paraffin embedded according to standard laboratory procedures. Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 6 μm (native cartilage) or 10 μm (SCs) and stained with 0.1% thionin for basic histological analysis. Primary antibodies for immunofluorescence were as follows: collagen II mouse monoclonal (1:50; NeoMarkers MS-235, Fremont, CA), collagen VI rabbit polyclonal (1:100; Fitzgerald, Acton, MA, RDI-600401108), and collagen I mouse monoclonal (1:100; Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, sc-59772). Secondary antibodies were purchased from (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA) and used at 1:200 concentration:goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (A11011), and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (A11001). Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde reaction was performed using the ABC staining kit (Santa Cruz).
In general, unmasking was achieved using chondroitinase ABC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 20 min at 37°C. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 37°C, and secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were counterstained with DAPI (Vectashield Hard Set Mounting Medium with DAPI; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Control slides were prepared by performing every step of the procedure except for the substitution of the primary antibody with blocking serum. Images were obtained using Bioquant Osteo II (v.8.00.20; Bioquant Image Analysis Corporation, Nashville, TN), and background exposure was normalized to the associated minus-primary control slide, with any additional staining considered positive.
Quantitative biochemistry
SCs were desiccated in a vacuumed centrifuge and digested overnight in proteinase K solution. Chondroitin sulfate (CS) content was quantified by metachromasia via optical density: sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) were reacted with dimethylmethylene blue and absorbance was read against a standard curve. Values are listed as μg sGAG/μg dry weight. Unseeded collagen gels were tested for sGAG content and found to have no significant values. Hydroxyproline (HP) content was quantified by using dimethylaminobenzaldehyde to observe chloramine T-oxidized HP, and absorbance was read against a standard curve. HP values of SC samples represent total content without normalizing to an unseeded collagen gel. With the exception of the treatment of 2% FBS+ascorbate, SC values represent the mean of three separate animals or patients ± the standard deviation from the mean. Results for native cartilage represent the results from seven samples.
MRI methods
MRI data were acquired at 9.4 T using a Bruker DMX system operating at 400 MHz (Bruker Biospin, Billerica, MA) and equipped with 1000 mT/m three-axis microimaging gradients. Standard imaging sequences were implemented as described below separately for the native tissue and the SCs, including measurement of matrix FCD via the gadolinium (Gd) exclusion assay.
Native human and bovine tissue
Osteochondral plugs (7 mm diameter) were immersed in a solution consisting of Sigma general-purpose protease inhibitor concentrate in 100 mL Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) with 12 mM of the MMP inhibitor GM6001 (Chemicon, Billerica, MA) titrated to pH 7.5 ± 0.1. Each osteochondral plug sample was immobilized within agarose gel in a 9 mm O.D. glass tube. Four such tubes were placed in a susceptibility-matched sample holder and imaged simultaneously with sagittal–coronal oblique slices passing through the center of each plug. Images were acquired with a 2 × 2 cm field of view (FOV), 0.5 mm slice thickness, 256 × 256 matrix size, and two averages. T2 was measured using 32 echoes with repetition time (TR)/TE = 5 s/12.8 ms. Pre-Gd T1 values were measured using TR ranging from 15 s to 400 ms in seven steps. Post-Gd TR values ranged between 1.6 s and 50 ms in 11 steps. MT was measured using the same spin-echo sequence preceded by a 6 kHz off-resonance saturation pulse of amplitude B1 = 12 μT and pulse length tp incremented from 0.1 to 4.6 s in eight steps. Results for the MRI evaluation of cartilage explants are reported in terms of a shallow, rather than superficial, zone, because of the limited spatial resolution of the MRI measurement.
Spot cultures
At each designated time point, the SCs and 15 mL of control media were placed into a 20 mm O.D. NMR tube. Imaging was performed using a Micro 2.5 probe body (Bruker Biospin) with a 20 mm transmit/receive proton birdcage resonator, with sagittal–coronal oblique slices passing through the center of each sample. Parameters included 3 × 2 cm FOV, 1 mm slice thickness, 256 × 256 matrix size, and two averages. T2 was measured using 64 echoes with TR/TE = 5 s/12 ms. Pre-Gd T1 values were measured using TR values ranging from 15 s to 100 ms in 12 steps. Post-Gd TR values ranged between 1.6 s and 25 ms in 12 steps. MT measurements were made using the same spin echo sequence preceded by a 6 kHz off-resonance saturation pulse of amplitude B1 = 12 μT and pulse length tp incremented from 0.1 to 4.6 s in eight steps.
Statistics
Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Significance was assessed using one-way analysis of variance except at Figure 8A, where a two-way analysis of variance was used. Student–Newman–Keuls or Tukey post hoc tests were performed, depending upon whether the distribution of the pertinent data was consistent with normality.
FIG. 8.
(A) Biochemical determination of sGAG content of cytokine-treated SCs (control and cytokine treatments as specified in Fig. 7). Both cytokine-treated groups (No Recovery and 2wk Recovery, labeled +Cytok) showed significantly decreased sGAG content as compared with control SCs grown in the absence of cytokines (labeled −Cytok, *p < 0.05). Even after 2 weeks of control growth postcytokine treatment, there is no quantifiable increase in sGAG content compared with SCs sacrificed immediately after cytokine treatment (^p = 0.58). (B) Magnetic-resonance-determined FCD in SCs as assessed after 2 weeks of recovery following 1 week of cytokine exposure (2wk Recovery), and values for corresponding control SCs (6 weeks of control growth, n = 5). See text for full experimental details. As seen, there was a persistent deficit in FCD in the cytokine-exposed SCs.
Results
Histological and immunohistochemical characterization of native cartilage
Analysis of the cartilage explants was performed as a basis for comparison with the ex vivo cartilage constructs described above. As expected, both bovine and human native cartilage displayed metachromasia indicative of the presence of sGAGs and PGs, and this metachromasia increased with the depth of cartilage (Fig. 1). Bovine cartilage expressed collagen type II in both the territorial (arrowheads) and interstitial matrix (arrows), along with limited intracellular staining (Fig. 1). Type II collagen within the human cartilage was preferentially localized to the interstitial matrix (Fig. 1, arrows). Both bovine and human cartilage exhibited collagen type VI localized to the territorial matrix (arrowheads), as has been previously described13,14 (Fig. 1), though some interstitial matrix staining was observed in the young bovine cartilage (arrows). Collagen type I was localized within the superficial zone of the articular surface in both the bovine and human cartilage, as is also consistent with previous literature15 (Fig. 1, arrows).
FIG. 1.
Histological characterization of native bovine and human cartilage. Sections were stained with thionin to estimate proteoglycan distribution via metachromasia, and reacted with antibodies against collagen II, collagen VI, and collagen I. In both bovine and human cartilage, metachromasia increased with depth from the articular surface. Collagen II was found in both the territorial (arrowheads) and interstitial matrix (arrows). As expected, collagen VI was localized in the pericellular regions within human articular cartilage (arrowheads). Collagen VI was found in both the pericellular (arrowheads) and interstitial (arrows) zones in native bovine cartilage. Collagen I was localized to a small band in the superficial zone in both samples (arrows). Asterisk indicates articular surface. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ten.
Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of ex vivo–generated cartilage
As described above, sets of SCs were evaluated at 24-h intervals over the first 7 days of culture, and then after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of growth (not all time points shown). Intracellular metachromasia was observed after 1 day in culture, with progressive development of metachromatic ECM staining thereafter (Fig. 2). Lacunae formation around chondrocytes, associated with the development of territorial and interstitial ECM, was observed after 3–4 days, with further development of these features at later time points. Collagen type II progressively accumulated in the interstitial matrix with increased time in culture (Fig. 2). Collagen type VI reached maximal expression after 2–3 days in culture and exhibited pericellular localization throughout all time points (Fig. 2). After 6 weeks in culture, SCs did not display collagen I at levels above the minus-primary control (not shown), suggesting that the original collagen I gel had been fully remodeled.
FIG. 2.
Histological characterization of bovine SCs grown in Opti-MEM medium with ascorbate. Histological sections were analyzed with thionin, along with antibodies against collagen II, collagen VI, and collagen I. There was increased extension of proteoglycan and collagen II into the interstitial matrix with time in culture. Collagen VI reached maximal staining at 2–3 days in culture, and retained its pericellular localization. Collagen I staining diminished after ∼5 days in culture, and was nearly undetectable at 6 weeks. d, day; wk, week; SCs, spot cultures. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ten.
Human SCs were grown in a variety of medium conditions to promote synthesis and accumulation of ECM. Histological results representing the results of four separate experimental conditions and time points are shown in Figure 3. Under each set of conditions, human chondrocytes remained viable throughout the 4-week culture period and displayed a limited degree of intracellular and territorial metachromasia (Fig. 3A–D). However, human SCs did not accumulate significant interstitial ECM, and did not appear to be undergoing active synthesis of type II collagen (Fig. 3E–H).
FIG. 3.
Efficacy of various medium formulations to induce matrix synthesis from human SCs. (A, E) Ham's F-12+2% FBS+50 μg/mL Asc; (B, F) Ham's F-12+10% FBS; (C, G) Ham's F-12+10% FBS+50 μg/mL Asc; (D, H) Opti-MEM+50 μg/mL Asc; time points as indicated. Thionin staining (A–D) illustrates little metachromasia outside small regions of territorial matrix. Immunostaining for collagen II (E–H) also displays little matrix staining, though minimal territorial matrix staining appears in the (F) and (G) groups. Asc, ascorbate; FBS, fetal bovine serum; wk, week. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ten.
Biochemical analysis of native and ex vivo–generated cartilage
Biochemical assays were performed to quantify sGAG content and HP content of native and ex vivo–generated cartilage. Bovine SCs grown in the absence of ascorbate developed approximately the same amount of sGAGs per unit dry weight as the native bovine cartilage after ∼4 weeks in culture, with some decline in sGAG content observed at 6 weeks. Bovine SCs grown in the presence of ascorbate exceed the sGAG amount of native bovine cartilage after ∼2 weeks and continued to accumulate sGAGs up to 6 weeks in culture (Fig. 4A).
FIG. 4.
(A) Biochemically determined sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) content of bovine SCs grown in Opti-MEM medium with or without 50 μg/mL ascorbate. sGAG content of native bovine cartilage is also presented for comparison. SCs grown without ascorbate reached similar levels of sGAG content to native bovine cartilage after 4 weeks in culture. SCs grown with ascorbate reached similar levels of sGAG content to native bovine cartilage after 2 weeks in culture, and exceeded native cartilage after 4 weeks (*p < 0.05). d, day; wk, week. (B) Biochemically determined hydroxyproline (HP) content of bovine SCs grown in Opti-MEM medium with or without 50 μg/mL ascorbate. Results for native bovine cartilage are also presented for comparison. Numerical results reflect both the underlying collagen I gel scaffold and the collagen elaborated by neocartilage, but can, nevertheless, be compared between the two groups presented. Ascorbate-treated SCs accumulated significantly higher HP content at the indicated time points (*p < 0.05); however, HP values did not reach those of the native tissue. d, day; wk, week.
The total HP content of SCs grown in the medium with or without ascorbate did not approach the value seen in native bovine cartilage (Fig. 4B). However, SCs grown in the presence of ascorbate displayed increased HP content compared with SCs grown without ascorbate. Neither the sGAG nor HP content of human SCs approached the total content of native human cartilage (Table 1).
Table 1.
Biochemical Content of Human Spot Cultures and Native Human Cartilage
| Tissue source | Treatment | Time in culture | μg sGAG/μg dry weight | μg HP/μg dry weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human cartilage | n/a | n/a | 0.104 ± 0.045 | 0.024 ± 0.001 |
| Human SCs | 2% FBS+Asc | 2 weeks | 0.000 (n = 1) | 0.002 (n = 1) |
| Human SCs | 10% FBS | 4 weeks | 0.011 ± 0.012 | 0.009 ± 0.001 |
| Human SCs | 10% FBS+Asc | 4 weeks | 0.003 ± 0.009 | 0.008 ± 0.0001 |
| Human SCs | Opti+Asc | 4 weeks | 0.052 ± 0.086 | 0.006 ± 0.003 |
Asc, ascorbate; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HP, hydroxyproline; SCs, spot cultures; sGAG, sulfated glycosaminoglycan; n/a, non-applicable.
MRI analysis of native and engineered cartilage
Figure 5 shows the average T2, km, and MTR values for native bovine and human cartilage by zone, and for ascorbate-treated bovine SCs over time. Native bovine and human cartilage both showed a shorter T2 in the middle and deep zones compared with the value in the shallow zone (Fig. 5A), consistent with the increase in PG content with depth seen in Figure 1. As seen in Figure 5B, T2 values for the SCs decreased with time, indicating development of matrix, but remained higher than those in the explant tissue. This is consistent with the fact that the matrix content in the SCs, while increasing, did not reach the levels of native cartilage. Values for km and MTR, generally reflective of collagen content, were greater in the middle and deep zones of native tissue than in the shallow region. SCs showed an increase in km and MTR with time, consistent with the denser collagen II immunostaining shown in Figure 2. Human SCs did not develop sufficient tissue integrity to permit MR evaluation.
FIG. 5.
(A) Magnetic resonance analysis of native bovine (n = 12) and human (n = 7) cartilage. T2 is inversely correlated with overall macromolecular content; both bovine and human samples show a decrease in T2 with distance from the articular surface. Magnetization transfer rate (MTR) and km correlate primarily with the collagen content of the matrix; both bovine and human samples show increasing values with depth. (B) Magnetic resonance analysis of ascorbate-treated bovine SCs (n = 5). SCs show a decrease in T2 with increased time in culture, reflecting progressive deposition of matrix, but values remained significantly lower than those in native cartilage. SCs show an increase in km and MTR with time in culture, but values did not reach those seen in native bovine cartilage. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 6 shows the FCD results for the native cartilage by zone, and for the SCs over time. As expected, the magnitude of FCD increased with depth in both explant systems (Fig. 6A). In the SCs (Fig. 6B), the magnitude of the FCD increased in the SCs through 4 weeks, but decreased at the 6-week time point.
FIG. 6.
(A) Magnetic-resonance-determined fixed charge density (FCD) of native bovine and human cartilage. FCD is a negative quantity, since the matrix-fixed charges are negative. An increase in the magnitude of FCD reflects increasing sGAG deposition. The magnitude of FCD increases with depth from the articular surface in both native bovine (n = 12) and human cartilage (n = 7). (B) FCD of ascorbate-treated bovine SCs (n = 5). The magnitude of FCD increases through 4 weeks in culture, with a decline seen 6 weeks. The FCD never reaches the level seen in the explant tissue. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Effects of cytokines on neocartilage growth and recovery
Histology and immunohistochemistry of the control SCs displayed intense territorial and interstitial metachromasia, along with extensive staining for collagen type II (Fig. 7A, B, E, F). Cytokine treatment for 1 week resulted in nearly a complete loss of metachromasia and collagen II immunostaining (Fig. 7C, D), consistent with the significantly reduced total sGAG content in cytokine-treated SCs compared to control SCs (Fig. 8A, No Recovery). Bovine chondrocytes in SCs were not able to regain comparable levels of sGAGs and FCD (Fig. 8A, B, 2wk Recovery); indeed, they were unable to initiate ECM neosynthesis even after 2 weeks of recovery following 1 week of cytokine exposure (Figs. 7G, H and 8A). No intracellular metachromasia or neosynthesis of collagen II was observed. The level of sGAGs in the 2wk Recovery samples was not significantly different from SCs sacrificed immediately after cytokine treatment (No Recovery, Fig. 8A).
FIG. 7.
Thionin staining and collagen II immunohistochemistry of control (Opti-MEM medium with ascorbate) and cytokine-treated (Opti-MEM medium with ascorbate, interleukin-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α as indicated in Materials and Methods section) SCs. (A, B) Control SCs grown for 4 weeks; (E, F) control SCs grown for 6 weeks, without the addition of cytokines. SCs sacrificed immediately after 1 week of cytokine treatment (C, D), while SCs exposed to cytokines for 1 week and then grown in the absence of cytokines for a further 2 week recovery period (G, H); see text for experimental details. Extracellular matrix depletion resulting from the cytokine treatment is evident in all treated samples (C, D, G, H). Even after 2 weeks of recovery, bovine chondrocytes in SCs are unable to re-initiate extracellular matrix neosynthesis (G, H). Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ten.
Discussion
Healthy, native cartilage represents a rational standard for comparison of tissue-engineered cartilage. Therefore, it is important to develop experimental paradigms that examine specific characteristics of native tissue compared with ex vivo–generated cartilage, including biochemical, biomechanical properties, and MR properties.
The findings in this study support the use of collagen I as a scaffold for the ex vivo generation of neocartilage from isolated chondrocytes. In comparison to native cartilage, bovine ex vivo–generated cartilage was hyaline in appearance and exhibited typical major ECM proteins localized to their proper regions either in the territorial (collagen VI) or in the interstitial matrix (collagen II and sulfated PGs). This indicates that the young bovine chondrocytes remained differentiated, even in the presence of type I collagen. Additionally, the presence of ascorbate had a profound impact on the ability of bovine constructs to accumulate sGAGs over time. Ascorbate increased the total amount of HP at each time point, although HP did not increase over time. We hypothesize that this is caused by the turnover of collagen I and its replacement with newly synthesized type II collagen, as the HP assay does not discriminate between the two collagens. Ascorbate has been shown to stimulate ECM production and organization,16 as well as cell proliferation, differentiation, and metabolic activity,17 and our results substantiate the findings of others. Ibold et al. showed that despite the form or concentration of ascorbate applied, supplementation resulted in upregulation of collagen type II, aggrecan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein mRNA in high-density pellet cultures.18 Ronzière et al. showed that with high seeding density in three-dimensional collagen sponges, ascorbate induced chondrocyte proliferation and upregulated the expression of mRNAs coding for cartilage matrix proteins.19 In monolayer, ascorbate treatment results in the prevention of de-differentiation in a subpopulation of chondrocytes, but not all chondrocytes. Round, undifferentiated cells immunostained positively for collagen type II, but not for collagen type I or fibronectin; nonround cells de-differentiated.20 This indicates that ascorbate influences chondrocytes to remain in a differentiated state in monolayer, but also suggests that monolayer culture will not be optimal for generating ex vivo cartilage.
Young, native bovine cartilage used as a source material for chondrocytes exhibited typical cartilage matrix molecules such as sulfated PGs, collagen II, and collagen VI. The distribution of collagen II and collagen VI was different from the pattern observed in mature cartilage. Specifically, collagen II was found within intra- and pericellular regions, whereas collagen VI expression was localized to the superficial zone. It is well documented in the literature that bovine articular cartilage undergoes biochemical changes throughout development and postnatal maturation, more so with respect to collagen composition and networking than PGs.21–24 Lee et al. showed that chondrons could not be isolated from fetal or juvenile bovine cartilage.25 Sherwin et al. described the expression and localization of collagen VI in the developing bovine femoral head as strongest in the superficial zone and the pericellular region around the cells in this zone.26 We have observed that bovine cartilage isolated from 2- to 4-year-old cows displayed collagen II localized to the interstitial matrix and collagen VI expressed throughout the depth of the cartilage and localized in the pericellular region (data not shown). In this regard, our bovine SC constructs more closely resembled mature bovine articular cartilage than the very young tissue from which the chondrocytes were derived. We hypothesize that the matrix molecules in our SC constructs are undergoing a more rapid maturation process than would occur in vivo, which may be caused by a number of things such as culture conditions or the heterogeneity of chondrocytes in young bovine cartilage, some of which will undergo further hypertrophy and ossification at the subchondral bone interface.
OA and degenerative joint disease (DJD) affect at least 20 million people in the United States and cost billions in medical care and lost wages.27 The successful generation of implantable constructs from mature cartilage biopsies or mesenchymal stem cells that achieve integration into the surrounding tissue has the potential to revolutionize DJD treatment and surgical options. Model systems under study for the tissue engineering of cartilage include the use of biodegradable polymeric scaffolds such as polyglycolic acid28,29 and poly-L-lactic acid,30,31 high-density pellet or suspension culture,6,18 bioreactors,1,32,33 and agarose,34 collagen,35,36 and fibrin37 scaffolds alone or in combination. Collagen, as a natural material, has some advantages over synthetic polymers in terms of tissue compatibility. Collagen is widely used as a scaffold for the tissue engineering of skin, lung tissue, and skeletal tissues such as bone and cartilage.38–41 However, the control of porosity available in polymeric and hybrid scaffolds42–44 is an important advantage that may prove to be a crucial component in the successful generation of human cartilage to be used surgically. With difficulties in obtaining sufficient numbers of human chondrocytes without monolayer expansion, the focus should be on maximizing the ECM formation and retention from smaller pools of chondrocytes, perhaps through the use of polymeric scaffolds. Currently, the most viable technique for treatment of advanced OA/DJD is the total knee arthroplasty. However, therapies such as autologous chondrocytes implantation (also known as the Carticel® procedure), where autologous chondrocytes that have been expanded in monolayer are injected beneath a periosteal flap that has been sewn over the cartilaginous defect, along with autologous allografts, subchondral drilling, and matrix-associated autologous chondrocytes transplantation are being used with mixed postsurgical success.45
Human chondrocytes in the SC model remained viable and exhibited some territorial ECM, but never formed extensive three-dimensional tissue. It has been shown that human chondrocytes in monolayer derived from OA patients can be stimulated to upregulate ECM molecules and downregulate catabolic molecules such as matrix metalloprotease-13 through medium treatments such as insulin-like growth factor-1 and transforming growth factor-beta1.46 In our study, the relative youth and metabolic activity of the bovine chondrocytes most likely allowed for the effective turnover of the gelatinous collagen type I and the neosynthesis of collagen type II. However, the aged and diseased human chondrocytes used in this study likely did not have the catabolic or anabolic capacity to turnover and re-generate ECM proteins to the extent that would be required for surgical implantation and integration into the surrounding tissue. It is possible that with the proper stimulation, these cells could support the interstitial accumulation of ECM molecules based on their viability and synthesis of territorial matrix. Although the use of younger, healthier human chondrocytes would be optimal, autologous implantation of ex vivo–generated cartilage will mostly likely occur in older patients whose chondrocytes may already be undergoing a disease process. The increased study of mesenchymal stem cells in both natural and synthetic constructs may prove to be key if these older, fully differentiated chondrocytes cannot be stimulated to form new cartilage on a replicable basis.
The noninvasive analysis of cartilage is an important adjunct in the diagnosis of joint disease, and biochemical data that can be derived from MR parameters will be useful in prescribing the appropriate treatment as matrix-specific therapies become available. While the T2 relaxation time of cartilage is dependent upon a number of tissue parameters, it has been demonstrated to decrease with the development of more solid matrix in engineered constructs. Thus, T2 can be regarded as an approximate marker for cartilage quality in this setting. In our studies, there was in fact a decrease in cartilage T2 over development time of the SCs, consistent with our biochemical findings of progressive matrix development. However, the T2 of SCs remained higher than the value for the native tissue, which is consistent with a lower level of overall macromolecular content in the SCs compared to the native tissue. In native bovine and human cartilage, interpretation of the depth-wise variation of T2 in terms of matrix composition is complicated by the layered structure of native cartilage. In particular, the dependence on depth of collagen fiber orientation47 results in a depth dependence of T2, as well as a dependence of T2 values on the orientation of the sample within the MRI magnet.48 Additional complexities apply to both native tissue and the SCs. These include the fact that T2 is dependent upon both CS and collagen content.49 Further, the measurement of tissue T2 values is based on a fit of MRI-derived relaxation data to a single decaying component, whereas in reality there is the potential for multiple compartments within tissue, each exhibiting its own T2 relaxation time. Indeed, a multiexponential analysis has revealed such multiple compartments within cartilage, with provisional assignments to collagen, PG, and free water.50
Investigation of observed MT ratios and apparent rate (km) of cartilage matrix has demonstrated a strong dependence on collagen concentration. Seo et al. reported a significant increase in MTR with increasing collagen concentration in solution, as well as a relative lack of dependence of MT on CS content.51 Laurent et al. showed an increase in MT with increasing concentration of both collagen I and collagen II in solution, with the former exhibiting a somewhat stronger effect.52 The authors attribute this difference to the sample preparation, which may have resulted in a greater degree of crosslinking in the collagen I sample. Indeed, this effect of crosslinking on MT and km has been studied directly.53 We found that native human cartilage exhibited a greater MTR and km than bovine cartilage in spite of its lower collagen content, consistent with a greater degree of crosslinking in human as compared to bovine cartilage.54 MTR and km increased with time in the SC system, although never reaching the values observed in the explants. This is consistent with the substantially lower collagen content of the SCs. Of note is that while MTR and km increased with culture time in the SC system, the HP content remained relatively unchanged. This again is consistent with development of a more heavily crosslinked collagen matrix.
Fixed negative charges responsible for osmotic activity in cartilage are primarily associated with sGAGs.55 Because negative FCD is the functional constituent of the matrix responsible for attracting water and thus imparting resistance to loading, nondestructive quantification of FCD through use of the MRI Gd exclusion method has been widely used to evaluate cartilage quality. In terms of tissue characteristics, MRI evaluation of FCD is complimentary to biochemically derived sGAG content, particularly because different disaccharides differ with respect to their ability to contribute to FCD. For example, CS contributes −2 moles of charge, while keratan sulfate contributes −1 mole of charge per mole of disaccharide.56
Of note is the fact that while native bovine cartilage was found to have more than twice the amount of CS by dry weight than did human cartilage, the MRI-derived FCD was only ∼10% greater. This may be attributable to the greater water content in bovine cartilage,57 as FCD represents the number of charged species per wet sample volume. For both types of tissue, our finding of increasing FCD with distance from the articular surface is consistent with previous MRI measurements using dGEMRIC,58 which have recapitulated earlier biochemical measurements of this depth dependence.59
In spite of the fact that the sGAG content normalized to dry weight of the SC system after 4 weeks exceeded that of native bovine cartilage, the FCD remained substantially lower. This could be accounted for by the much greater degree of hydration in the SCs. In addition, little is known regarding the nature of the disaccharides produced by chondrocytes in collagen I scaffolds.
Remodeling of the ECM demonstrates the chondrocyte's capacity to respond to physiological signals. We determined here that bovine chondrocytes in the SC model system have the capability to upregulate matrix degrading enzymes in response to treatment with the cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α, as evidenced by the histological breakdown of PGs and collagen II, and diminished biochemical sGAG content. These cellular responses have long been described in chondrocytes,60,61 so it is not surprising that bovine chondrocytes in the SC system were able to receive and respond to these signals. In fact, chondrocytes in cartilage explants from pigs responded to similar concentrations of IL-1.62 However, even after 2 weeks of recovery time, the chondrocytes did not show neosynthesis of ECM molecules. Whether this is the result of irreversible damage, phenotype alteration, or insufficient time allowed for recovery cannot be determined without further study. These results suggest that inserting healthy constructs into diseased joints might not be effective, because of the wealth of degradative signals already present and active within the joint.
There are some limitations to the techniques used in this study; for example, the immunohistochemical data were observed and described rather than quantified through computer software. Additionally, these biochemical assays cannot differentiate between different types of GAGs and collagens. Further quantitative analysis of these ex vivo–generated cartilage constructs is currently underway, including qRT-PCR determination of ECM gene expression. As yet, it is unclear whether the human SCs are limited in their secretion of ECM molecules due to decreased mRNA expression.
In summary, we have presented a model of ex vivo–generated bovine cartilage with properties similar to its native tissue. However, we have also demonstrated that despite similar biochemical characteristics, ex vivo–generated bovine cartilage does not exhibit a spatial distribution of MR parameters comparable to that of native bovine cartilage. Human chondrocytes in this model remained viable but did not produce ECM to a degree that would permit surgical implantation studies.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Mahan Packing Company in Bristolville, Ohio, for supplying all bovine samples. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging, and a grant from the Arthritis Foundation.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Chen C.T. Fishbein K.W. Torzilli P.A. Hilger A. Spencer R.G. Horton W.E., Jr. Matrix fixed-charge density as determined by magnetic resonance microscopy of bioreactor-derived hyaline cartilage correlates with biochemical and biomechanical properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:1047. doi: 10.1002/art.10991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shulz R.M. Bader A. Cartilage tissue engineering and bioreactor systems for the cultivation and stimulation of chondrocytes. Eur Biophys J. 2007;36:539. doi: 10.1007/s00249-007-0139-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Almqvist K.F. Dhollander A.A. Verdonk P.C. Forsyth R. Verdonk R. Verbruggen G. Treatment of cartilage defects in the knee using alginate beads containing human mature allogenic chondrocytes. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1920. doi: 10.1177/0363546509335463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chajra H. Rousseau C.F. Cortial D. Ronzière M.C. Herbage D. Mallein-Gerin F. Freyria A.M. Collagen-based biomaterials and cartilage engineering. Application to osteochondral defects. Biomed Mater Eng. 2008;18:S33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohan N. Nair P. A synthetic scaffold favouring chondrogenic phenotype over a natural scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:373. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bernstein P. Dong M. Corbeil D. Gelinsky M. Günther K.P. Fickert S. Pellet culture elicits superior chondrogenic redifferentiation than alginate-based systems. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:1146. doi: 10.1002/btpr.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adachi N. Ochi M. Deie M. Ito Y. Izuta Y. Lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee after meniscectomy treated by the transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage and osteochondral plug. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:107. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nicodemus G.D. Bryant S.J. Mechanical loading regimes affect the anabolic and catabolic activities by chondrocytes encapsulated in PEG hydrogels. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:126. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Potter K. Butler J.J. Horton W.E. Spencer R.G. Response of engineered cartilage tissue to biochemical agents as studied by proton magnetic resonance microscopy. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1580. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200007)43:7<1580::AID-ANR23>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brun P. Abatangelo G. Radice M. Zacchi V. Guidolin D. Daga Gordini D. Cortivo R. Chondrocyte aggregation and reorganization into three-dimensional scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;46:337. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19990905)46:3<337::aid-jbm5>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chai D.H. Arner E.C. Griggs D.W. Grodzinsky A.J. Alphav and beta1 integrins regulate dynamic compression-induced proteoglycan synthesis in 3D gel culture by distinct complementary pathways. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:249. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hu J.C. Athanasiou K.A. Low-density cultures of bovine chondrocytes: effects of scaffold material and culture system. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2001. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pullig O. Weseloh G. Swoboda B. Expression of type VI collagen in normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7:191. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Söder S. Hambach L. Lissner R. Kirchner T. Aigner T. Ultrastructural localization of type VI collagen in normal adult and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:464. doi: 10.1053/joca.2002.0512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wardale R.J. Duance V.C. Quantification and immunolocalisation of porcine articular and growth plate cartilage collagens. J Cell Sci. 1993;105:975. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.4.975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ahsan T. Harwood F. McGowan K.B. Amiel D. Sah R.L. Kinetics of collagen crosslinking in adult bovine articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:709. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shapiro I.M. Leboy P.S. Tokuoka T. Forbes E. DeBolt K. Adams S.L. Pacifici M. Ascorbic acid regulates multiple metabolic activities of cartilage cells. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:1209S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.6.1209s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ibold Y. Lübke C. Pelz S. Augst H. Kaps C. Ringe J. Sittinger M. Effect of different ascorbate supplementations on in vitro cartilage formation in porcine high-density pellet cultures. Tissue Cell. 2009;41:249. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ronzière M.-C. Roche S. Gouttenoire J. Démarteau O. Herbage D. Freyria A.-M. Ascorbate modulation of bovine chondrocyte growth, matrix protein gene expression and synthesis in three-dimensional collagen sponges. Biomaterials. 2003;24:851. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00418-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brodkin K.R. García A.J. Levenston M.E. Chondrocyte phenotypes on different extracellular matrix monolayers. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5929. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Williamson A.K. Chen A.C. Masuda K. Thonar E.J. Sah R.L. Tensile mechanical properties of bovine articular cartilage: variations with growth and relationships to collagen network components. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:872. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pal S. Tang L.H. Choi H. Habermann E. Rosenberg L. Roughley P. Poole A.R. Structural changes during development in bovine fetal epiphyseal cartilage. Coll Relat Res. 1981;1:151. doi: 10.1016/s0174-173x(81)80017-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Strider W. Pal S. Rosenberg L. Comparison of proteoglycans from bovine articular cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975;379:271. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Williamson A.K. Chen A.C. Sah R.L. Compressive properties and function-composition relationships of developing bovine articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:1113. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee G.M. Poole C.A. Kelley S.S. Chang J. Caterson B. Isolated chondrons: a viable alternative for studies of chondrocyte metabolism in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997;5:261. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(97)80022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sherwin A.F. Carter D.H. Poole C.A. Hoyland J.A. Ayad S. The distribution of type VI collagen in the developing tissues of the bovine femoral head. Histochem J. 1999;31:623. doi: 10.1023/a:1003811310619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) National and state medical expenditures and lost earnings attributable to arthritis and other rheumatic conditions—United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.DiCarlo B.B. Hu J.C. Gross T. Vago R. Athanasiou K.A. Biomaterial effects in articular cartilage tissue engineering using polyglycolic acid, a novel marine origin biomaterial, IGF-1, and TGF-beta 1. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009;223:63. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang L. Tran I. Seshareddy K. Weiss M.L. Detamore M.S. A comparison of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:2259. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gunja N.J. Athanasiou K.A. Effects of co-cultures of meniscus cells and articular chondrocytes on PLLA scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:808. doi: 10.1002/bit.22301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yan H. Yu C. Repair of full-thickness cartilage defects with cells of different origin in a rabbit model. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:178. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Khan A.A. Suits J.M. Kandel R.A. Waldman S.D. The effect of continuous culture on the growth and structure of tissue-engineered cartilage. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:508. doi: 10.1002/btpr.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Salzmann G.M. Nuernberger B. Schmitz P. Anton M. Stoddart M.J. Grad S. Milz S. Tischer T. Vogt S. Gansbacher B. Imhoff A.B. Alini M. Physicobiochemical synergism through gene therapy and functional tissue engineering for in vitro chondrogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:2513. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kock L.M. Schulz R.M. van Donkelaar C.C. Thümmler C.B. Bader A. Ito K. RGD-dependent integrins are mechanotransducers in dynamically compressed tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. J Biomech. 2009;42:2177. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang L. Spector M. Comparison of three types of chondrocytes in collagen scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:45012. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pabbruwe M.B. Esfandiari E. Kafienah W. Tarlton J.F. Hollander A.P. Induction of cartilage integration by a chondrocytes/collagen-scaffold implant. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4277. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baumgartner L. Arnhold S. Brixius K. Addicks K. Bloch W. Human mesenchymal stem cells: influence of oxygen pressure on proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation in fibrin glue in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32577. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 19708077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ahn S. Yoon H. Kim G. Kim Y. Lee S. Chun W. Designed three-dimensional collagen scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0511. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 20001740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lin Y.M. Zhang A. Rippon H.J. Bismarck A. Bishop A. Tissue engineering of lung: the effect of extracellular matrix on the differentiation of embryonic stem cells to pneumocytes. Tissue Eng Part A. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0232. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 20001250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reichert J.C. Heymer A. Berner A. Eulert J. Nöth U. Fabrication of polycaprolacton collagen hydrogel constructs seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:65001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/6/065001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zheng L. Fan H.S. Sun J. Chen X.N. Wang G. Zhang L. Fan Y.J. Zhang X.D. Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells induced by collagen-based hydrogel: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32588. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 19653302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tan H. Wu J. Huang D. Gao C. The design of biodegradable microcarriers for induced cell aggregation. Macromol Biosci. 2010;10:156. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200900160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luo L. Wei X. Chen G.Q. Physical properties and biocompatibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) blended with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20:1537. doi: 10.1163/092050609X12464345023041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Heymer A. Bradica G. Eulert J. Nöth U. Multiphasic collagen fibre-PLA composites seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells for osteochondral defect repair: an in vitro study. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009;3:389. doi: 10.1002/term.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lützner J. Kasten P. Günther K.P. Kirschner S. Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:309. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Seifarth C. Csaki C. Shakibaei M. Anabolic actions of IGF-1 and TGF-beta1 on interleukin-1beta-treated human articular chondrocytes: evaluation in two and three dimensional cultures. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:1245. doi: 10.14670/HH-24.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Muehleman C. Majumdar S. Issever A.S. Arfelli F. Menk R.H. Rigon L. Heitner G. Reime B. Metge J. Wagner A. Kuettner K.E. Mollenhauer J. X-ray detection of structural orientation in human articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12:97. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xia Y. Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: a review. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:602. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200010000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Menezes N.M. Gray M.L. Hartke J.R. Burstein D. T2 and T1rho MRI in articular cartilage systems. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:503. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Reiter D.A. Lin P.C. Fishbein K.W. Spencer R.G. Multicomponent T2 relaxation analysis in cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:803. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Seo G.S. Aoki J. Moriya H. Karakida O. Sone S. Hidaka H. Katsuyama T. Hyaline cartilage: in vivo and in vitro assessment with magnetization transfer imaging. Radiology. 1996;201:525. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Laurent D. Wasvary J. Yin J. Rudin M. Pellas T.C. O'Byrne E. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of articular cartilage in the goat knee with magnetization transfer imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;19:1279. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(01)00433-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fishbein K.W. Gluzband Y.A. Kaku M. Ambia-Sobhan H. Shapses S.A. Yamauchi M. Spencer R.G. Effects of formalin fixation and collagen cross-linking on T2 and magnetization transfer in bovine nasal cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:1000. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Maroudas A. Wachtel E. Grushko G. Katz E.P. Weinberg P. The effect of osmotic and mechanical pressures on water partitioning in articular cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1073:285. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(91)90133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Urban J.P. Maroudas A. Bayliss M.T. Dillon J. Swelling pressures of proteoglycans at the concentrations found in cartilaginous tissues. Biorheology. 1979;16:447. doi: 10.3233/bir-1979-16609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Maroudas A. Muir H. Wingham J. The correlation of fixed negative charge with glycosaminoglycan content of human articular cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969;177:492. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(69)90311-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Basalo I.M. Mauck R.L. Kelly T.A. Nicoll S.B. Chen F.H. Hung C.T. Ateshian G.A. Cartilage interstitial fluid load support in unconfined compression following enzymatic digestion. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:779. doi: 10.1115/1.1824123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bashir A. Gray M.L. Burstein D. Gd-DTPA2- as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:665. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Maroudas A. Physicochemical properties of cartilage in the light of ion exchange theory. Biophys J. 1968;8:575. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86509-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Flannery C.R. Little C.B. Hughes C.E. Caterson B. Expression of ADAMTS homologues in articular cartilage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;260:318. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dozin B. Malpeli M. Camardella L. Cancedda R. Pietrangelo A. Response of young, aged, and osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes to inflammatory cytokines: molecular and cellular aspects. Matrix Biol. 2002;21:449. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(02)00028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pearson W. Orth M.W. Karrow N.A. Lindinger M.I. Effects of simulated digests of Biota orientalis and a dietary nutraceutical on interleukin-1-induced inflammatory responses in cartilage explants. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69:1560. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.12.1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]









