The roles, mechanisms, and controversies of autophagy in mammalian biology

Abstract

Autophagy is a universally conserved metabolic program of catabolism that plays important roles in energy homeostasis and impacts both normal physiology and multiple disease processes, including cancer. Autophagy has been documented as a pro-survival mechanism used to maintain viability under starvation conditions; however, conflicting findings have also implicated autophagy in the control of cell death. Adding to the controversy, central mediators of autophagy have been implicated in both pro-survival and pro-death processes. This report highlights recent insights into our understanding of how autophagy is regulated and newly discovered physiological roles for autophagy in normal biology and disease.

Introduction and context

Cellular systems maintain homeostatic equilibrium through a constant balance between biosynthetic (anabolic) processes and catabolism. Macroautophagy, herein referred to as autophagy, is an evolutionarily conserved, catabolic metabolic program that is a key pathway for cellular adaptation to metabolic stresses such as nutrient withdrawal (amino acids and glucose) or hypoxia. During autophagy, internal cellular components, including bulk cytoplasm and organelles, are sequestered into double-membrane structures known as autophagic vesicles (AVs). Following fusion of AVs to lysosomes, the internal contents are degraded, and the degradation products are used to fuel catabolic metabolic processes for energy generation [1]. Starvation-induced autophagy is an important process by which cells ‘recycle’ existing contents for fuel to promote cell viability, while basal levels of autophagy play a critical role in protein and organelle quality control [2].

Autophagy is induced through a stepwise process culminating in the assembly of the autophagosome by core autophagy machinery. A distinct family of autophagy-related genes that mediate the assembly and processing of the autophagosome have been identified [3]. At the molecular level, the induction of autophagy is linked to signal transduction pathways involved in nutrient sensing (Figure 1). Signalling by the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway downstream of growth receptors engages cellular programs of growth and proliferation and inhibits catabolic metabolic pathways, including autophagy [4]. Inhibition of mTOR, which integrates growth factor signals and amino acid availability to regulate cap-dependent protein translation, is associated with the induction of autophagy [5]. Low cellular energy levels can stimulate autophagy by inhibiting mTOR, a process regulated in part by an LKB1/AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase)-mediated energy checkpoint [6-8].

Figure 1. Pathways of autophagy control in mammalian cells.

(a) Under normal growth conditions, signal transduction downstream of growth factor receptors activates mTORC1 via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Activation of mTORC1 promotes cell growth through the regulation of cap-dependent protein translation and the simultaneous inhibition of autophagy. Glutamine (Gln) is transported into cells via the SLC1A5 glutamine transporter and is subsequently used to import leucine (Leu) via the SLC7A5-SLC3A2 complex. Intracellular leucine activates mTORC1 Rag GTPases or a second undefined pathway. Basal autophagy is maintained under these conditions by the activity of Beclin-1, which is inhibited by anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL. Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL also function to maintain viability by antagonizing Bax/Bak-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis. (b) Under conditions of metabolic stress, including nutrient depletion (glucose and amino acid), growth factor withdrawal, or energy deficit, the mTOR pathway is inhibited, resulting in autophagy induction. Under conditions of glutamine depletion, the resulting decline in leucine import reduces amino acid-dependent activation of mTORC1. Activation of the LKB1-AMPK pathway by energetic imbalance results in mTORC1 inhibition through activation of the TSC1-TSC2 complex and inhibition of the mTOR-binding partner Raptor. Extended periods of nutrient withdrawal can induce mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis through activation of caspases downstream of Bax/Bak-dependent cytochrome c (Cyt c) release. Antagonism of Bcl-2 family members by BH3-only proteins may trigger either autophagy or apoptosis, depending on the context. AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; mito, mitochondrion; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; mTORC1, mTOR complex 1; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase; TSC, tuberous sclerosis protein.

Major recent advances

Regulation by amino acids

Several recent breakthroughs have advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing the regulation of autophagy. mTOR activity has long been known to be responsive to nutrient levels; amino acid depletion is a potent stimulator of autophagy. However, the mechanisms linking amino acid levels to mTOR activation and autophagy inhibition have remained one of the key outstanding questions in the field. Three independent studies by the groups of Guan, Sabatini, and Murphy have provided new mechanistic insight into how nutrients direct autophagy. The first insight was the identification of the Rag family of small GTPases as key stimulators of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) activity in response to amino acids [9,10]. Amino acids stimulate the association of Rag GTPases with the mTOR-binding partner Raptor, resulting in mTOR activation (Figure 1). Constitutively active Rag mutants mimic a ‘nutrient replete’ state, conferring resistance to starvation-induced autophagy triggered by amino acid withdrawal. Second, Nicklin et al. [11] provided evidence for a coupled glutamine-leucine amino acid shuttle system involved in mTOR regulation and autophagy induction. They demonstrated that glutamine import by the glutamine transporter SLC1A5 is coupled to the import of leucine via the SLC7A5-SLC3A2 antiporter; intracellular leucine is then sensed by intracellular mediators (possibly Rag GTPases) to stimulate mTOR activity (Figure 1). Knockdown of expression of either SLC1A5 or SLC7A5-SLC3A2 results in the induction of autophagy and a reduction in cell size [11]. Thus, amino acid transporters upstream of mTOR play a key role in autophagy regulation by dictating amino acid availability.

Autophagy and cell death

Autophagy has been ascribed both cytoprotective and pro-apoptotic functions, and as such the role of autophagy in cell death has remained controversial. ‘Autophagic’ cell death is loosely defined by the presence of autophagosomes in dying cells [12]. The use of this classification is poor as autophagy, like apoptosis, is a cellular morphology, and many, if not most, cells increase their rate of autophagy under conditions of stress that promote cell death. Thus, defining cell death as ‘autophagic’ based on the presence of AVs may not be accurate [13]. Confounding this classification, autophagy can induce cell death directly through both conventional apoptotic machinery [14] and caspase-independent processes [15], depending on the context. Moreover, when metabolic stress is induced in cells lacking the function of conventional apoptotic pathways, autophagy ultimately results in energetic crisis, leading to necrosis [1]. Thus, under pathophysiological conditions of nutrient or oxygen limitation (that is, a growing tumour lacking vasculature), autophagy may promote necrosis instead of apoptosis. It remains unclear whether autophagic cell death functions as a central mediator of programmed cell death or is simply a mechanism of ‘last resort’ when conventional apoptosis pathways are impaired.

Recent findings in lower organisms have suggested a physiological role for autophagy in cell death control during normal development. Autophagy is specifically induced in Drosophila melanogaster at two developmental stages - germarium and mid-oogenesis - and induction of autophagy at these stages promotes starvation-induced cell death [16,17]. Interestingly, these developmental stages are highly influenced by nutritional status, which may suggest that ‘autophagy as executioner’ is primarily linked to cellular bioenergetics rather than other apoptotic pathways such as those triggered by DNA damage. To date, the demonstration of a required role for autophagy in cell death control during development in vivo has been limited to experimental systems in the fruit fly. Whether autophagy plays a similar role in mammals remains to be determined.

While its role in cell death control remains unclear, autophagy has been implicated in coordinating the clearance of dying cells and cellular debris. The ‘recycling’ function of autophagy serves an important role in the clearance of apoptotic cells [18]. Deregulation of autophagy has been implicated in various pathological conditions, including neurodegeneration [19] and tumourigenesis (discussed in the following section). The contribution of autophagic cell death to these processes remains an open question.

Autophagy and tumour suppression

The involvement of autophagy in cancer development and progression has been an important recent advance in the field of cancer biology. The upregulation of autophagy has been correlated with differing stages of cancer progression. In particular, autophagy is believed to be upregulated in cancerous lesions marked by environments of decreased oxygen or nutrient stress or both. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that oncogene and tumour suppressor networks exert opposing effects on autophagy. When activated, several oncogenes, including PI3K/Akt, mTOR, and Bcl-2, function largely as inhibitors of autophagy, while tumour suppressors [that is, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue), Beclin-1, tuberous sclerosis protein 2 (TSC2), LKB1, and p53] stimulate autophagy [20]. This dichotomy has remained controversial though, as autophagy can promote cell survival in response to cellular stress and thus autophagy could potentially contribute to oncogenesis. However, the involvement of autophagy in tumour suppression may actually stem from its role in the degradation of damaged proteins and organelles, including mitochondria, rather than its role in stress responses [18].

Beclin-1 remains the primary autophagy regulator associated with tumourigenesis. Haploinsufficiency of Beclin-1 promotes tumourigenesis in mouse models and is associated with breast and ovarian tumours in humans [21,22]. This may be due in part to a still poorly defined role for Beclin-1 in the maintenance of chromosome integrity [23]. Modifiers of Beclin-1 activity can alter tumourigenic potential; positive regulators of Beclin-1, including UVRAG (UV radiation-associated gene) and Bif, display tumour suppressor properties [24,25], while Beclin-1 function is inhibited by Bcl-2 [26], a known oncogene. Together, these data suggest that regulation of basal levels of autophagy through Beclin-1 is an important gateway to tumourigenesis. Another regulator of autophagy is the tumour suppressor p53, although its role in autophagy induction remains controversial. The ability of p53 to induce autophagy appears to depend on its cellular localization; nuclear localized p53 triggers stress-induced autophagy through transcriptional control of autophagy mediators, including DRAM (damage-regulated autophagy modulator) [27], while cytoplasmic p53 appears to function as a negative regulator [28]. Growing tumours require p53-dependent autophagy to survive metabolic stress in vivo [7] and may represent an important avenue for therapeutic intervention, particularly in p53-deficient tumours.

Future directions

Much insight has been gained into the mechanisms and biology of autophagy, but many questions remain. Although we have focussed solely on macroautophagy in this report, autophagy exists in several distinct forms (that is, microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy) and can target specific cellular organelles (that is, pexophagy and mitophagy). Understanding the differential regulation of these processes remains a major challenge for the field. In addition, despite recent advances, our knowledge of the signalling networks and layers of regulation that govern autophagy is limited. For example, what are the mechanisms by which amino acids signal to Rag GTPases (or other mediators) to limit autophagy? How do other non-metabolic stressors such as DNA-damaging agents signal to the autophagy machinery? Finally, recent studies have implicated autophagy as an integral biological process involved in a number of pathophysiological conditions, including cancer, neurodegeneration, aging, and infectious disease. The challenge will be to identify the exact role - positive or negative - that autophagy plays in these conditions, to determine the underlying mechanisms that regulate autophagy in each case, and to translate this knowledge into autophagy-based therapeutics to treat disease.

Abbreviations

AMPK

adenosine monophosphate (AMP) -activated protein kinase

AV

autophagic vesicle

DRAM

damage-regulated autophagy modulator

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

mTORC1

mTOR complex 1

PI3K

phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase

PTEN

phosphatase and tensin homologue

SLC1A5

solute carrier family 1 (neutral amino acid transporter), member 5

TSC2

tuberous sclerosis protein 2

UVRAG

UV radiation-associated gene

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found at: http://www.F1000.com/Reports/Biology/content/1/68