Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 2007 Nov 26;18(23):2738–2745. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2007.10.044

Spiroborate esters in the borane-mediated asymmetric synthesis of pyridyl and related heterocyclic alcohols

Viatcheslav Stepanenko 1, Melvin De Jesús 1, Wildeliz Correa 1, Irisbel Guzmán 1, Cindybeth Vázquez 1, Lymaris Ortiz 1, Margarita Ortiz-Marciales 1,*
PMCID: PMC2948488  NIHMSID: NIHMS100444  PMID: 20890455

Abstract

The effectiveness of several spiroborate ester catalysts was investigated in the asymmetric borane reduction of 2-, 3-, 4-acetylpyridines under different reaction conditions. Highly enantiomerically enriched 1-(2-, 3- and 4-pyridyl)ethanols and 1-(heterocyclic)ethanols were obtained using 1 to 10% catalytic loads of the spiroborate 5 derived from diphenylprolinol and ethylene glycol.

1. Introduction

Enantiopure secondary alcohols are key intermediaries in the synthesis of a large number of pharmaceutical products.1,2 In particular, non-racemic alcohols (or their derived amines) containing heterocyclic fragments are known for their biological activity.35 The borane-mediated reduction of prochiral ketones catalyzed by organoboranes, specifically the well known 1,3,2-oxazaborolidines,6,7,8 have become the preferred approach to obtain non-racemic alcohols due to their high enantioselectivity, predictable absolute stereochemistry, ease of handling and operation, and low environmental impact. However, ketones containing a heteroatom can form borane complexes that not only decrease the borane source but, also, can compete with the enantioselective carbonyl reduction.5 Acetylpyridines were reduced with borane employing 20 mol% of B-Me CBS catalyst, but the process gave with low selectivity (< 52% ee). A stoiquiometric amount of catalyst increased the % ee only modestly.9 Masui and co-worker10 introduced a more reactive oxazaborolidine system generated in situ from 10% diphenyl prolinol and trimethylborate and successfully reduced 3- and 4-acetyl heteroaryl ketones with high to excellent enantioselectivity. However, to achieve good selectivity for the 2-acety analogues, a stoiquiometric amount of the amino alcohol was required. In related work, protection of the pyridine nitrogen by a methyl or allylic group significantly increased the enantioselectivity of non-enolizable diaryl- or pyridylaryl ketones.11

Recently, we reported the synthesis of a series of stable spiroborate esters derived from non-racemic 1,2-aminoalcohols and ethylene glycol. These compounds, shown in Fig. 1, were fully characterized by 1H, 13C and 11B NMR, HRMS, IR, optical rotation and mp.12 All exhibited high efficiency and enantioselectivity as catalysts for the borane-mediated asymmetric reduction of acetophenone.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Chiral spiroborates derived from non-racemic 1,2-aminoalcohols

Herein, we present a systematic study of the asymmetric borane-mediated reduction of acetylpyridines and related heterocyclic ketones using the spiroborate esters 15 as catalysts. These spiroborates are crystalline compounds that can be stored for long periods of time (> 1 y). Moreover, spiroborate 5 was exposed to moist air at 25 °C for over 24 h, without significant hydrolysis or decomposition being observable by 1H, 13C and 11B NMR analysis.

2. Results and discussion

Initially, we studied the asymmetric reduction of 3-acetylpyridine (6) using spiroborates 1 5. The reduction was carried out with BH3-SMe2 (1.6 equiv) and 10 mol % of the catalyst at room temperature. The enantiopure 1-(3-pyridyl)ethanol (7) was isolated after the reaction mixture was quenched with methanol at 0 °C, left overnight at reflux temperature, concentrated under vacuum and purified by column chromatography on deactivated aluminum oxide (method a). The results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Reduction of 3-acetylpyridine with spiroborate esters 15 as catalysts in THF at 25 °C using BH3-SMe2

graphic file with name nihms100444f3.jpg
Entry Cat. Mol % Yield (%) ee(%)a Conf.
1 1 10 89 91 R (+)
2 2 10 85 96b S (−)
3 3 10 94 96c R (+)
4 4 10 88 92 S (−)
5 5 10 80 99 R (+)
a

By GC of O-acetyl derivatives on a CP-Chiralsil-DexCB column.

b

By GC on a chiral column.

c

By 31P NMR of phosphonate (CDA).14

Although the catalysts 14 (entries 1–4) provided good enantioselectivity (i.e. >90% ee) spiroborate 5 was particularly effective, (99% ee) for the reduction of 6 (entry 5).

Several studies were carried out to determine the minimum effective catalyst loading, the best reaction temperature and solvent, as well as borane source. For these studies we chose to employ 3-acetylpyridine and the spiroborate 1 which is derived from the inexpensive and commercially available, norephedrine. The optimal amount of 1 was determined through the reduction of 3-acetylpyridine with BH3-SMe2 (1.6 equiv) by varying the amount of catalyst from 0.1 to 20 mol % at 25 °C. The results are shown in Table 2. The reduction of 3-acetylpyridine with 20 mol % of catalyst 1 afforded the corresponding alcohol in 91% ee and 84% isolated yield (entry 1). Decreasing the catalyst to 1 mol % slightly decreases the selectivity to 87% ee (entry 5). When smaller amounts of catalyst (>1 mol %) were used, the isolation process was more convenient by vacuum distillation in a Kugelrohr apparatus (method b), usually increasing the chemical yield.

Table 2.

Studies on the reduction of 3-acetylpyridine employing different catalytic load of 1

Entry Catalyst 1 (mol%) Yield (%) eec (%)
1 20 84a 91
2 10 89a 91
3 5 94a 90
4 2.5 95a 89
5 1 93b 87
6 0.5 93b 84
7 0.25 96b 81
8 0.1 91b 65
a

Purified by column chromatography.

b

Purified by distillation.

c

By GC of O-acetyl derivative on a CP-Chiralsil-DexCB column.

To illustrate the cut-off effect for catalyst 1, the correlation curve between the amount of catalyst and the enantiopurity of 1-(3-pyridyl)ethanol is presented in Fig 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Amount of catalyst 1 vs % ee of 1-(3-pyridyl)ethanol

Solvents play a key role in the degree of enantioselectivity achieved by the oxazaborolidine catalyzed borane-mediated reductions.6,7 Therefore, we studied the 3-acetylpyridine reduction in different solvents using only 1 mol% of spiroborate ester 1 to enhance the differences in enantioselectivity. As shown in Table 3 (entry 1), THF was the most effective solvent in terms of chemical yield and enantioselectivity. Less polar solvents such as dichloromethane and toluene led to a decrease in the enantioselectivity of the reaction.

Table 3.

Solvent effects on the reduction of 3-acetylpyridine with 1 mol% of catalyst 1

Entry Solvent Yield (%) a Ee (%)b
1 THF 93 87
2 Dioxane 87 84
3 t-ButylMethylEther 93 71
4 CH2Cl2 89 63
5 Toluene 65 61
a

Isolated yield.

b

By GC of O-acetyl derivative on a CP-Chiralsil-DexCB column.

Temperature and differing borane source are also critical factors in the enantioselectivity of carbonyl and oxime reductions.6,12,13 To amplify these changes, the reduction of 3-acetylpyridine was performed with 0.5 mol % spiroborate 1 in THF. The results are summarized in Table 4. Optimal selectivity was achieved at 25 °C in THF using BH3-SMe2 (entry 3, 84% ee). Use of BH3-THF stabilized with NaBH4 (entries 4) resulted in a dramatic decrease in the enantioselectivity.7,15

Table 4.

Effect of temperature and different borane sources on the reduction of 3-acetylpyridine in THF with 0.5 mol % of catalyst 1

Entry Reaction conditions Ee (%)a
1 BH3- SMe2, 0 °C 61
2 BH3- SMe2, 50 °C 71
3 BH3- SMe2, 25 °C 84
4 BH3-THFb, 25 °C 15
5 BH3-THFc, 25 °C 65
6 BH3-DEA, 25 °C 65
a

Determined by GC of O-acetyl derivatives.

b

Borane was stabilized with 0.005 M NaBH4.

c

Borane was stabilized with <0.005 M N-isopropyl N-methyl-tert-butyl amine.

Further studies were extended to the reduction of the 2-, 3-and 4-acetylpyridines with catalyst 5. The results for the 3, and 4-acetylpyridines are shown in Table 5. Initially, the solvent dilution effect on the degree of selectivity was determined for the reduction of 3-acetylpyridine with 1 mol % of spiroborate ester 5. When the catalyst was diluted ten times, the enantiomeric excess dropped from 98% to 82% ee.

Table 5.

Enantioselective reduction of 3- and 4-acetylpyridine with catalyst 5

graphic file with name nihms100444f4.jpg
Entry Cat. 5 (mol%) Pyridine Yield (%) eea (%)
1 10 3-acetyl 80 99
2 5 3-acetyl 93 99
3 2.5 3-acetyl 91 98
4 1.0 3-acetyl 96 98
5 0.5 3-acetyl 93 94
6 10 4-acetyl 88 99
7 2.5 4-acetyl 95 99
8 1 4-acetyl 92 99
a

By GC of O-acetyl derivatives on a chiral column.

The reduction of 3-, and 4-acetylpyridines with spiroborate 5 was successfully performed with less than 5 mol % providing the enantiopure pyridyl ethanols (> 98% ee, Table 5, entries 4 and 8) in excellent yield. Remarkably, the reduction of 4-acetyl pyridine at 25 °C in THF using BH3-SMe2 afforded 99% ee even with 1 mol% of catalyst. In addition, using 10% catalyst 3 for the reduction of 3-, and 4-acetylpyridine, afforded also high enantioselectivity: 97.2% ee and 96.4% ee, respectively, determined by 31P NMR analysis of the phosphonate derivatives, which were prepared by the Alexakis method.14

The asymmetric borane reduction of 2-substituted heteroaryl ketones is more challenging since borane complexed to the pyridyl nitrogen can reduce the carbonyl group through an intramolecular process, thereby decreasing the enantioselectivity of the reaction. Initially, 2-acetylpyridine (9) was reduced with 0.1 equiv of catalyst 1 and 2 equiv of borane-SMe2 in THF at room temperature.

Quenching the reaction mixture with methanol (procedure a) for the isolation of 1-(2-pyridyl) ethanol (10) was not effective, perhaps, due to the formation of the stable alkoxyborane complexes. The product was successfully obtained after acid hydrolysis and continuous extraction from the aqueous phase for 3 days with diethyl ether. Nevertheless, the isolated yield was modest. The selectivity was also low, even when 1 equiv of spiroborate 1 was used (entry 1–3, Table 6). Several electrophiles, such as TMSCl, BF3, B(OMe)3 and BEt3, were employed to protect the pyridyl nitrogen. The enantioselectivity, however, was not improved and other side products were observed. The reduction of 2-acetyl pyridine with 1equiv of catalyst 5 and 2 equiv of borane- SMe2 achieved 93% ee (entry 7). An attempt was made to use the catalyst 5 more efficiently by adding a second load of 2-acetylpyridine after the initial asymmetric reduction was performed, before quenching the reaction. Unfortunately, the enantioselectivity dropped from an initial 93% ee to 58% ee. Borane DEA and catalyst 5 afforded 78% ee (entry 8). Surprisingly, when the reducing reagent was BH3-DEA, the absolute configuration of product was (S), the opposite compared to the obtained with borane-SMe2. Since alcohol 10 is water-soluble, the chemical yield was improved by its isolation as its acetyl ester (entries 6 and 7).

Table 6.

Enantioselective reduction of 2-acetylpyridine using spiroborates 1 and 5 as catalysts

graphic file with name nihms100444f5.jpg
Entry Catalyst Mol % catalyst Reagent Yield % % eea, (Conf)
1 1 10 BH3-SMe2 59 8 (R)
2 1 25 BH3-SMe2 54 16 (R)
3 1 100 BH3-SMe2 58 40 (R)
4 5 10 BH3-SMe2 - 10 (R)
5 5 50 BH3-SMe2 56 58 (R)
6 5 100 BH3-SMe2 82b 93 (R)
7 5 100 BH3-DEA 79b 78 (S)
a

By GC on a chiral column (CP-Chiralsil-DexCB) of O-acetate.

b

The product was isolated as O-acetate derivative.

Other important heteroaryl ketones were reduced with borane employing the spiroborate 5 catalyst to expand the scope of the reaction. The results are presented in Table 7. The 5-acetyl-2-methoxypyridine was effectively reduced with only 1 mol% of catalyst 5 (98% ee, entry 1). Initial reduction of 2-acetylphenothiazine using 1 mol % of catalyst 5 afforded 94% ee, but with 10 mol % of catalyst provided highly enantiopure alcohol 12 (> 99% ee). Interestingly, spiroborate ester 3 derived from (S)-diphenyl valinol also provided 12 with similarly high selectivity. In the reduction of 4′-(imidazol-1-yl) acetophenone with 10 mol % of catalyst 5, the enantiomeric excess of alcohol 13 increased slightly to 92%. The solubility of these large heterocyclic compounds play a crucial role since they require more dilute solutions which affects the effectiveness of the catalyst. The reduction of 3-benzoylpyridine with 10 mol % of 5 produced (R)-phenyl pyridyl methanol (14) in good yield with 83% ee (entry 7).

Table 7.

Enantioselective reduction of other heterocyclic ketones using spiroborates 3 and 5 as catalysts

graphic file with name nihms100444f6.jpg
Entry Substrate Cat. Prod Mol % Yield (%) eea (%)
1 5-acetyl-2-methoxy pyridine 5 11 1 77 98b
2 2-acetylphenothiazine 5 12 1 94 94
3 2-acetylphenothiazine 5 12 10 97 >99
4 2-acetylphenothiazine 3 12 10 95 >99
5 4′-(Imidazol-1-yl) acetophenone) 5 13 1 85 90
6 4′-(Imidazol-1-yl) acetophenone 5 13 10 76 92
7 3-benzoylpyridine 5 14 10 83 83
a

By 31P NMR of phosphonate (CDA) derivative.14

b

By GC of O-acetyl derivatives on a chiral column.

3. Conclusion

Prochiral ketones containing heteroaromatic fragments undergo asymmetric reduction with a high degree of enantioselectivity using the novel spiroborates derived from non-racemic 1,2-amino alcohols. This work demonstrates that these crystalline spiroborates can be successfully used as highly efficient chiral transfer reagents employing less than 1 mol % of the catalyst in some cases. The synthesis of important enantio-pure alcohols with heterocyclic groups was also achieved in high chemical yield by a rapid and practical procedure for small and potential large-scale industrial use.

4. Experimental

All reactions were performed in oven-dried glassware (120 °C) under N2 atmosphere. Air- and moisture sensitive reagents and solvents were transferred via syringe. All reagents were obtained commercially unless otherwise noted. Common solvents were dried and distilled by standard procedures. Anhydrous borane reagents were purchased from Aldrich and used directly from the sealed bottle. Chromatographic purification of products was accomplished using flash chromatography on a Merck silica gel, Si 60® (200–400 mesh) or Fisher, Activity I, 60–325 mesh acid alumina oxide deactivated by 3% of water, 25–30 g; hexane AcOEt 100:1 to 1:1 using HPLC grade solvents. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck silica gel plates. Spots were made visible with an UV lamp and/or I2 vapors. Infrared analyses were performed in a Termo Nicolet 670 FT-IR. 1H, 13C and 11B NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer with standard pulse sequences operating at 400.152 MHz, 100.627 MHz, 128.384 MHz and and 161.992 MHz for 1H, 13C, 11B and 31P respectively, in CDCl3. Chiral gas chromatography analysis was processed on a Hewlett Packard GC 5890 equipped with a Chrompack Chiralsil-Dex-CB column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm). GC-MS analysis was processed on a Finnigan Trace GC/Polaris Q Mass detector using a Restek RTX-5MS column. A Perking Elmer Polarimeter Model 341 was used for optical rotation analysis.

4.1 (±)-1-(6-Methoxypyridin-3-yl)-ethanol (11)

To 1-(6-methoxypyridin-3-yl)ethanone (151 mg, 1 mmol) in THF (5 mL) and MeOH (1 mL) was added solid sodium borohydride (38 mg, 1 mmol) at 25 °C. After the reaction mixture was stirred over 1h, the solvents were evaporated and the residue dissolved in water (10 mL). Solid NaCl was added, followed by ammonia hydroxide solution (30% in water, 1 mL). The product was extracted with ether (5×10 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The solvents were removed under vacuum; the residue was distilled in a Kugelrohr apparatus under vacuum to give the final product as colorless oil (133 mg, 87%).

4.2 General preparation of O-acetyl derivatives for GC-analysis of pyridyl ethanols

To a solution of the racemic or enantio-enriched alcohol (20 mg, 0.16 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (1 mL,) in a 2 mL vial was added neat triethylamine (0.1 mL, 0.72 mmol), acetic anhydride (0.1 mL, 1.06 mmol ) and a small crystal of DMAP (5 mg, 0.04 mmol ). The mixture was left at 25 °C for 5 min. After the reaction was complete (followed by TLC, hexane/AcOEt, 1:1), the mixture was transferred to a second 10 mL vial with H2O (2.5 mL) and shaken for 5 min. Solid Na2CO3 (2 g) was carefully added by small portions and left for 5 min, shaking from time to time. Extreme evolution of gas was observed. The O-acetyl derivative was extracted with diethyl ether (4 mL) and the organic phase was transferred with a Pasteur pipette to another vial and analyzed by chiral GC.

4.3 Synthesis of Chiral Derivatizing Agent (CDA) 18 for enantiomeric analysis of alcohols by 31P NMR14

4.3.1 Dicarbamate (16)

In a 250 mL round flask, a solution of (R,R)-(−)-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (10 g, 88 mmol) in toluene (130 mL) was stirred and cooled to 0 °C. Ethyl chloroformate (18.1 mL, 190 mmol) and NaOH (7.6 g, 190 mmol) in water (8.3 mL) were added simultaneously. Temperature should not reach more than 10 °C during the addition. The mixture was then stirred overnight and the precipitate was filtered and rinsed with CH2Cl2. The solid was continuously extracted in a soxhlet system overnight with CH2Cl2 (150 mL). The solutions were then mixed, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated under vacuum. The dicarbamate 17 was obtained as a white solid (89% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.23 (m, CH3); 1.72 (d, CH2); 2.0 (d, CH2); 3.33 (m, CH2), 4.09 (m, CH), 4.97 (N-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.6 (OCH2CH3), 24.8, 32.9, 55.4 (NCH), 60.7 (OCH2CH3) and 157.0 (C=O).

graphic file with name nihms100444u1.jpg

4.3.2 (R,R)-N,N′-Dimethyl-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (17)

To a solution of LiAlH4 (14.89 g, 392.5 mmol) in dry THF (300 mL) was slowly added compound 16 (20.29 g, 78.5 mmol) in dry THF (50 mL) at 25 °C. The mixture was stirred for 18 h at reflux temperature and cooled to 0 °C. Ethylenediamine (20 mL) was slowly added to the mixture, followed by a 15% NaOH aqueous solution (20 mL) during 1 h. The precipitate was removed through celite pad, and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum. The celite was then extracted overnight with ethyl ether using a Soxhlet apparatus. The ether solutions were combined, dried over K2CO3, filtered and concentrated. After vacuum distillation through a 10 cm Vigreux column, the colorless diamine 17 was obtained in a 61% yield. Bp 83 °C (20 mm Hg); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.98 (m, 1H, CH); 1.25 (m, 1H, CH); 1.51 (s, 1H, N-H); 1.75 (m, 1H, CH); 2.04 (m, 1H, CH); 2.12 (m, 1H, CH); 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.0 (NHCH3), 30.8, 33.6, 63.2 (NHCH).

graphic file with name nihms100444u2.jpg

4.3.3 Chloro-1,3-dimethyl-octahydro-benzo[1,3,2] diazaphosphole (CDA 18)

To a solution of the chiral diamine 17 (0.50 g, 3.50 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) in 25 mL round flask was added triethylamine (2.44 mL, 17.5 mmol), followed by the addition of PCl3 (1.22 mL, 14.0 mmol). The mixture was concentrated under vacuum to eliminate the excess of PCl3. The CDA 18 in CDCl3 (10 mL) was prepared as a standard solution (0.35 M) for further diastereoisomeric analyses.

CDA (18) preparation in a NMR tube

In a dried NMR tube were placed the chiral alcohol (0.02 g, 0.141 mmol) and CDCl3 (0.4 mL). The tube was shaken until complete dissolution. Et3N (0.1 mL, 0.717 mmol) was added with a micro syringe, followed by the addition of PCl3 (0.05 mL, 0.573 mmol). The NMR tube was carefully shaken as an exothermic reaction takes place. The mixture is concentrated under vacuum. The same amounts of CDCl3 and triethylamine were added again to the NMR tube. The in situ solution of CDA 18 was immediately used. A 31P NMR spectrum was recorded to check the reagent; 31P NMR (161.992 MHz, CDCl3); δ 182.

4.3.4 General procedure for derivatization for 31P NMR analysis

To the CDA 18 (0.141 mmol) in a NMR tube was added triethylamine (0.1 mL) and diamine 17 (8 to 10 μL). The solution was shaken and the 31P NMR spectrum was recorded and analyzed. The conversion of 19 to the corresponding thiophosphoramidates with sulfur (S8) powder were carried out in the same NMR tube for a second 31P NMR determination in cases where the signals were not resolved. A racemic sample of each alcohol was used to identify the relevant signals before each non-racemic derivative was analyzed. This was also necessary to insure that the alcohol enantiomers react at the same rate with the CDA. 31P NMR (161.992 MHz, CDCl3); δ (ppm) derivative of (±)-1-(4-pyridyl)ethanol (8), 141.23 and 140.13 (Δ δ = 1.10); )-1-(3-pyridyl)ethanol (7), 141.58 and 140.32 (Δ δ = 1.26); (±)-1-(2-pyridyl)ethanol (10), 141.11 and 138.23 (Δ δ = 2.88).

4.4 (R)-(+)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-ethanol (7) using 1 mol% of catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10 M, 1.6 mL, 16.0 mmol) was added to a solution of (S)-2-[(1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yloxy)diphenylmethyl]pyrrolidine (5)12 (32 mg, 0.10 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) at 25 °C and the mixture was stirred for 1h. A solution of 3-acetylpyridine (1.21 g, 10.0 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added for 5 h using an infusion pump. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt over 1 h, then cooled at 0 °C and quenched with methanol (10 mL). After refluxing for 12 h, the solvents were removed under vacuum; the residue was distilled in a Kugelrohr apparatus under vacuum to give the final product as colorless oil (1.18 g, 96%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.47 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, Me), 4.88 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, CHMe), 6.02 (br. s, 1H, OH), 7.22 (m, 1H, CHAr), 8.29 (m, 1H, CHAr), 8.41 (m, 1H, CHAr); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.3, 67.1, 123.6, 133.7, 142.2, 146.9, 147.6. Chiral GC of O-acetyl derivative (Rt 12.05 min) indicated 98.2% ee. [α]23D = +41.1° (c 3.6, CHCl3). Lit.16 [α]20D = +52.4° (c 1.40, CHCl3) for > 95% ee.

4.5 (R)-(+)-1-(4-Pyridyl)-ethanol (8) using 1 mol% of catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10M, 1.6 mL, 16.0 mmol) was added to a solution of (S)-2-[(1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yloxy)diphenylmethyl]-pyrrolidine (5)12 (32 mg, 0.10 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) at 25 °C. A solution of 4-acetylpyridine (1.21 g, 10.0 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added for 5 h using an infusion pump. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C over 1h, cooled at 0 °C and quenched with methanol (10 mL). After refluxing for 4 h, the mixture was analyzed by 11B NMR and the N-BH3 complex signal was observed at −13.28 ppm. More MeOH (10 mL) was added and refluxed for 12 h. The solvents were removed under vacuum and the residue was distilled in a Kugelrohr apparatus under vacuum to give pure (R)-1-(4-pyridyl)ethanol as a white crystalline material (1.13 g, 92%); (mp: 55–58 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ1.39 (d, J = 6.4Hz, 3H); 4.80 (q, J = 6.4Hz, 1H); 5.1 (s, 1H); 7.22 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H); 8.31 (d, J = 5.6Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.0 (CH3); 68.2 (C-H(OH); 120.6 (CHAr); 149.0 (CHAr); 156.0. Chiral GC of O-acetyl derivative (Rt 12.39 min) indicated 99% ee. [α]23D = +49.0 (c 2.5, CHCl3). Lit.16 [α]20D = +42.5° (c 1.04, MeOH) for > 95% ee.

4.6 (R)-(+)-1-(2-Pyridyl)-ethanol (10) using 100 mol % catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10M, 0.5 mL, 5.00 mmol) was added to a solution of (S)-2-((1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yloxy)diphenylmethyl)pyrrolidine (5)12 (808 mg, 2.50 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) at rt for 4h. A solution of 2-acetylpyridine (303 mg, 2.50 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added for 1h using an infusion pump. The reaction mixture was stirred 1h at 25 °C, cooled to 0 °C, quenched with methanol (5 mL) and refluxed for 12 h. The solvents were removed under vacuum and the residue dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL). Acetic anhydride (2 mL) and triethylamine (2 mL) were added followed by DMAP (5 mg). After stirring at 25 °C for 1 h, the reaction mixture was added to water (15 mL) and quenched with solid Na2CO3 (10 g). The organic phase was separated and the product was extracted with ethyl ether (5 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried with MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuum. The product was purified by column chromatography (Al2O3 deactivated by 3% of water, 35 g; hexane and hexane AcOEt 100:1 to 10:1). The main fractions were concentrated under vacuum and the residue was distilled in Kugelrohr apparatus under vacuum to give the final product as colorless oil (338 mg, 82%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.61 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CHMe), 2.13 (s, 3H, OAc), 5.91 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, CHMe), 7.20 (m, 1H, CHAr), 7.33 (d, J = 8Hz, 1H, CHAr), 7.68 (m, 1H, CHAr), 8.58 (m, 1H, CHAr); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.7, 21.3, 73.1, 120.5, 122.7, 136.7, 149.4, 160.3, 170.3. Chiral GC of O-acetyl derivative indicated 92.9 % ee. [α]23D= +90.1° (c 2.5, CHCl3). Lit.16 [α]20D = +102.3° (c 1.27, CHCl3) for > 95% ee.

4.7 (R)-(+)-1-(6-Methoxy-pyridin-3-yl)-ethanol (11) using 1 mol % of catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10M, 0.99 mL, 9.9 mmol) was added to a solution of (S)-2-[(1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yloxy)diphenylmethyl]pyrrolidine (5)12 (19.9 mg, 0.06 mmol) in dry THF (3 mL) at rt and the mixture was stirred for 1h. A solution of 1-(6-methoxypyridin-3-yl)ethanone (930 mg, 6.16 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added for 5h using an infusion pump. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C over 1 h, then cooled to 0 °C and quenched with methanol (5 mL). After refluxing for 12 h, the solvents were removed under vacuum and the product was purified by column chromatography (Al2O3 deactivated by 3% of water, 25 g; hexane AcOEt 100:1 to 1:1). The main fractions were concentrated under vacuum and the residue was distilled in a Kugelrohr apparatus (oven temperature 210 °C) under vacuum (1 mm Hg) to give the final product as colorless oil (726 mg, 77%). IR (CaF2, film, cm−1): 3355 (br, OH), 2974, 2948, 1609, 1496, 1325, 1286, 1253, 1094, 1029. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.45(d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H, CHMe), 3.16 (br. s, 1H, OH), 3.89 (s, 3H, OMe), 4.81 (q, J = 6.5, 1H, CHMe), 6.70 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 7.60 (m, 1H, CHAr), 8.01 (m, 1H, CHAr); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.8, 53.5, 67.6, 110.8, 133.7, 136.5, 144.1, 163.7. Chiral GC of O-acetyl derivative indicated 98.0 % ee. [α]23D= +33.7° (c 2.7, CHCl3).

4.8 (R)-(+)1-(10H-Phenothiazin-2-yl)-ethanol (12) using 10 mol % catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10.0 M, 2.0 mL, 20 mmol) was added to a solution of spiroborate 5 (0.323g, 1.0 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL) at 25 °C and the mixture was stirred for about 15 min. A solution of 2-acetyl-1-phenothiazine (2.413 g, 10.0 mmol) in dry THF (40 mL) was added to the reaction mixture during 1 h using an infusion pump. The mixture was allowed to react overnight. The reaction was cooled to 0 °C, quenched with MeOH (20 mL) and heated to reflux for 2 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by washing the solid 1-(10H-phenothiazin-3-yl)ethanol with dichloromethane (50 mL) several times to remove traces of impurities and dried overnight under high vacuum obtaining pure (R)-1-(10H-phenothiazin-2-yl)-ethanol (2.375 g, 97.6% yield). Mp 134–136 °C.18 IR (cm−1): 3396 (NH), 3314 (OH), 1091 (C-O). 1H NMR (400 MHz, (DMSO): δ 1.27 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H, CH3); 4.57 (m, 1H, C-HOH); 5.10 (d, J = 4.0 Hz 1H, -OH); 6.7–7.0 (m, 7H, Ar); 8.55 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 26.2, 68.1, 112.0, 114.6, 114.9, 117.0, 119.4, 122.1, 126.2, 126.7, 127.9, 142.4, 142.7, 147.6. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): (Racemic Derivative): δ (ppm) 141.02 and 137.91 (Δδ = 3.11). (Chiral Alcohol): δ (ppm) 137.91 (>99% ee). [α ]23D = +24.0° (c 1.0, MeOH).

4.9 (R)-(+)-4′-(Imidozol-1-yl)-phenyl ethanol (13) using 10 mol % catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10M, 2.0 mL, 20.0 mmol) was added to catalyst 5 (323 mg, 0.10 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL) at rt. A solution of 4′-(imidazol-1-yl) acetophenone (1.86 g, 10.0 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was added for 5 h using an infusion pump. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C overnight and then, cooled to 0 °C and quenched with methanol (10 mL). After refluxing overnight, the solvents were removed under vacuum. The crude was purified by flash column chromatography on a silica column (40 g) using ethyl acetate to give the pure 13 as a white crystalline material (1.40 g, 76%), mp: 118–120 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ1.53 (d, J = 6.4Hz, 3H), 3.7. (br s, 1H), 4.96 (q, J = 6.4Hz, 1H), 7.14 (s, 1H); 7.24 (s, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.8 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.5 (CH3); 69.3 (C-H(OH), 118.3, 121.4, 127.0 (CHAr), 130.0, 135.5, 136.2(CHAr), 146.0. The product was analyzed by 31P NMR with small amount of sulfur; the diastereomers signals at 86.1 ppm (3.5 %) and 85.8 ppm (96%) provided 92.5% ee. [α]23D = +31.7 ° (c 0.40, CHCl3). Lit.19 [α ]17D = −33 (c 0.48, CHCl3) for >98% (by HPLC) for (S) enantiomer.

4.10 (S)-(+)-Phenyl(pyridin-3-yl)methanol (14) with 10 mol% catalyst 5

Borane-SMe2 complex (10.0 M, 1.0 mL, 10 mmol) was added to a solution of spiroborate 5 (0.323 g, 1.0 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL) at 25 °C and the mixture was stirred for about 15 min. A solution of 3-benzoylpyridine (1.832 g, 10.0 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was added to the reaction mixture during 1 h. The mixture was allowed to react overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, then MeOH (20 mL) was added and the mixture was heated to reflux for 8 h. Decomposition of N-BH3 complex was confirmed by 11B NMR and the mixture was concentrated to colorless oil. The residue was distilled under high vacuum in the Kugelrohr oven (140 °C/0.7 mmHg) obtaining pure phenyl (pyridin-3-yl)methanol (1.53 g, 83 % yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.20 (s, 1H, OH); 5.84 (s, 1H, C-H); 7.23 (m, 1H, C-H), 7.27 7.38 (m, 5H); 7.71 (m, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H); 8.36 (dd, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H); 8.50 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 73.9, 123.5, 126.6, 127.9, 128.7, 134.4, 139.7, 143.2, 148.0, 148.3. Using the in situ CDA solution a diastereomeric sample was prepared and analyzed by 31P NMR (161.992 MHz, CDCl3); the enantio-purity was 83% ee. [α]23D = +12.0 (c 1.6, CHCl3). Lit.20 [α ]20D = −19.0 (c 1.20, CHCl3) for 75% ee (by HPLC).

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the National Institute of Health through their MBRS (GM 08216), INBRE (NC P20 RR-016470) and NSF-ADVANCE (SBE-0123645) Grants is greatly appreciated. Support for undergraduate scholars from the NIH-INBRE, NIH-RISE, NIH-MARC, and NSF-AMP programs is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  • 1.Shinkai I. Pure & Appl Chem. 1997;69:453–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Silverman RB. The Organic Chemistry of Drug Design and Drug Action. Elsevier Academic Press; Burlington, MA: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Hull KG, Visnic M, Tautz W, Sheffron A. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:12405–12414. [Google Scholar]; (b) Truppo MD, Pollard D, Devine P. Org Lett. 2006;9:335–338. doi: 10.1021/ol0627909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) De Martino G, La Regina G, Di Pasquali A, Ragno R, Bergamini A, Ciaprini C, Sinistro A, Maga G, Crespan E, Artico M, Silvestrini R. J Med Chem. 2005;48:4378–4388. doi: 10.1021/jm050273a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Challenger CA. Chiral Drugs. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tanis SP, Evans BR, Nieman JA, Parker TT, Taylor WD, Heasley SE, Herrington PM, Perrault WR, Hohler RA, Dolak LA, Hester MR, Seest EP. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2006;17:21–54. 2182. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Brown HC, Chandrasekharan J, Ramachandran PV. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:1539. [Google Scholar]; (b) Matteson DS. Stereodirected Synthesis with Organoboranes. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Corey EJ, Helal CJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1998;37:1986–2012. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980817)37:15<1986::AID-ANIE1986>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Glushkov VA, Tolstikov AG. Russ Chem Rev. 2004;73:581–608. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cho BT. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:7621–7643. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Quallich JG, Woodall TM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:785–788. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Masui MST. Synlett. 1997;273:274. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Corey EJ, Helal CJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:5675–5678. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Stepanenko V, Ortiz-Marciales M, Correa W, De Jesus M, Espinosa S, Ortiz L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2006;17:112–115. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ortiz-Marciales M, Stepanenko V, Correa W, De Jesus M, Espinosa S. 11/512,599. US Patent Application. 2006 Aug 30;
  • 13.(a) Huang X, Ortiz-Marciales M, Stepanenko V, Merced FG, Ayala AM, De Jesus M. Org Lett. 2007;9:1793–1795. doi: 10.1021/ol0704791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b)(c) Ortiz-Marciales M, Huang X, Stepanenko V, De Jesus M, Merced F. Provisional U.S. Patent Application. 2006 Aug 30;
  • 14.(a) Alexakis A, Frutos JC, Mutti S, Mangeney P. J Org Chem. 1992;57:1224–1237. [Google Scholar]; (b) Alexakis A, Frutos JC, Mutti S, Mangeney P. J Org Chem. 1994;59:3326–3334. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nettles SM, Matos K, Burkhardt ER, Rouda DR, Matos K, Burkhardt ER, Rouda DR, Corella JA. J Org Chem. 2002;67:2970–2976. doi: 10.1021/jo016257c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Seemayer R, Schneider MP. Tetrahedron:Asymmetry. 1992;3:8278–30. [Google Scholar]; (b) Morris DJ, Hayes AM, Wills M. J Org Chem. 2006;71:7035–7044. doi: 10.1021/jo061154l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.The absolute configuration was assigned according to the predicted stereochemical outcome.6
  • 18.Massie SP, Cooke I, Hills W. J Org Chem. 1956;21:1006–1008. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ema T, Yoshii M, Korenaga T, Sakai T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2002;13:1223–1229. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takemoto M, Tanaka K. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 2001;15:173–176. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES