Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2010 Oct 8;87(4):545–552. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.09.004

Adiponectin Concentrations: A Genome-wide Association Study

Sun Ha Jee 1,2,11,, Jae Woong Sull 3,11, Jong-Eun Lee 4, Chol Shin 5, Jongkeun Park 6,7, Heejin Kimm 1, Eun-Young Cho 4, Eun-Soon Shin 4, Ji Eun Yun 1, Ji Wan Park 8, Sang Yeun Kim 1, Sun Ju Lee 1, Eun Jung Jee 1, Inkyung Baik 9, Linda Kao 2, Sungjoo Kim Yoon 6,7, Yangsoo Jang 10,∗∗, Terri H Beaty 2
PMCID: PMC2948810  PMID: 20887962

Abstract

Adiponectin is associated with obesity and insulin resistance. To date, there has been no genome-wide association study (GWAS) of adiponectin levels in Asians. Here we present a GWAS of a cohort of Korean volunteers. A total of 4,001 subjects were genotyped by using a genome-wide marker panel in a two-stage design (979 subjects initially and 3,022 in a second stage). Another 2,304 subjects were used for follow-up replication studies with selected markers. In the discovery phase, the top SNP associated with mean log adiponectin was rs3865188 in CDH13 on chromosome 16 (p = 1.69 × 10−15 in the initial sample, p = 6.58 × 10−39 in the second genome-wide sample, and p = 2.12 × 10−32 in the replication sample). The meta-analysis p value for rs3865188 in all 6,305 individuals was 2.82 × 10−83. The association of rs3865188 with high-molecular-weight adiponectin (p = 7.36 × 10−58) was even stronger in the third sample. A reporter assay that evaluated the effects of a CDH13 promoter SNP in complete linkage disequilibrium with rs3865188 revealed that the major allele increased expression 2.2-fold. This study clearly shows that genetic variants in CDH13 influence adiponectin levels in Korean adults.

Main Text

Adiponectin in serum decreases insulin resistance and body weight by increasing lipid oxidation in muscle and other organs, such as the pancreas and liver.1 Adiponectin is reduced among obese individuals, as well as those with diabetes mellitus or coronary heart disease.2,3 Adiponectin circulates in several forms, principally as a low-molecular-weight hexamer (∼180 kDa) and a high-molecular-weight multimer (∼360 kDa).4 Recent evidence has suggested that the high-molecular-weight adiponectin may be more strongly related to several characteristics of the metabolic syndrome complex.5

A recent family-based study reported a shared heritability of adiponectin and the metabolic syndrome.6 Identification of genes controlling adiponectin levels may aid our understanding of how genes influence metabolic syndrome and possibly obesity.7,8 Recently, several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for adiponectin have identified ADIPOQ (MIM 605441) and ARL15 as possibly causal.9–11 Because these genome-wide studies were conducted primarily in samples from European-derived populations, it remains uncertain whether these findings can be applied to other populations, especially Asian populations. Continental Asian populations have a higher percentage of body fat for a given unit of body mass index (BMI) than do Europeans.12 However, there has been no published GWAS for adiponectin yet in an Asian population.

We conducted a GWAS of adiponectin levels with the Human SNP Array 5.0 (Affymetrix) on a discovery sample of volunteers from the Korean Metabolic Syndrome Research Initiative study in Seoul. For replication purposes, we selected samples from two other areas in South Korea: Ansan and Bundang-gu, both in Gyeonggi Province; where a genome-wide marker panel was available from the former. We also tested for association with high-molecular-weight adiponectin by using SNPs identified from the Seoul discovery sample in a third replication sample.

Subjects for the GWAS were recruited from the Korean Metabolic Syndrome Research Initiative study in Seoul, initiated in December 2005. A total of 9,128 individuals were recruited in 2006, and an additional 17,569 individuals were recruited in 2007.13,14 Therefore, the total Seoul cohort included 26,697 volunteers. Volunteers from the first round had routine health examinations at the Health Promotion Center in University Hospitals between January 2006 and December 2007. From this total, 6,563 individuals were randomly selected for measurement of adiponectin levels. Of the 6,563 individuals with adiponectin, 1,004 individuals were genotyped. A total of 305 individuals were selected for having very low (33rd percentile) or very high (66th percentile) adiponectin levels and waist circumference. Another 699 individuals were randomly selected for genome-wide genotyping. A total of 1,004 individuals were selected from our Seoul discovery set (see Figure S1 available online).

Subjects in a second genome-wide cohort were drawn from the Ansan cohort, initiated in 2001 as part of the Korean Genome Epidemiology Study (KoGES). Initial Ansan samples included 5,020 participants aged 40–69.15 The sampling base for this cohort is Gyeonggi Province, about 30 km west of Seoul. Members of this cohort have been examined every 2 years since their baseline visit, with the third scheduled follow-up study (including family members) completed in 2008. A total of 5,020 samples were genotyped. From these 5,020 samples, 3,022 subjects were randomly selected for measurement of adiponectin levels.

Subjects for a third cohort were selected from the Korean Metabolic Syndrome Research Initiative study in the Bundang-gu area. Bundang-gu is also in Gyeonggi Province, about 30 km south of Seoul. A total of 2,304 individuals from Bundang-gu were recruited in 2008 and had both total and high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels measured.

The Institutional Review Board of Human Research of Yonsei University approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

For all three cohorts, each participant was interviewed via a structured questionnaire to collect personal history of cigarette smoking (never smoked, ex-smoker, or current smoker), alcohol consumption (nondrinker or drinker of any amount of alcohol), demographic characteristics (age, gender, etc.), and family history of diabetes. Waist circumference was measured midway between the lower rib and iliac crest. For measurement of weight and height, light clothing was worn. Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2).

For clinical chemistry assays, serum was separated from peripheral venous blood samples obtained from each participant after a 12 hr fast and stored at −70°C. From this stored serum, adiponectin levels were measured via ELISA (Mesdia Co., Ltd.). Intra- and interassay variances for adiponectin ranged from 6.3% to 7.4% and 4.5% to 8.6%, respectively.16 Quality control (QC) of data was in accordance with procedures of the Korean Association of Laboratory Quality Control.

Seoul samples (cohort 1) were genotyped on the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 5.0 at DNALink. For the data obtained from this chip, internal QC measures were used: the QC call rate (dynamic model algorithm) always exceeded 86%, and heterozygosity of X chromosome markers identified gender for each individual. Genotype calling was performed with the Birdseed (v2) algorithm. A total of 1,004 individuals were genotyped via this platform in the first discovery phase. However, 10 of 1,004 individuals were removed because of low genotyping call rates (<95%). PLINK (v1.06) was used to estimate identity by state (IBS) over all SNPs, and four individuals were shown to be biological relatives, so one member of each pair was excluded. Eleven individuals were also excluded as a result of gender mismatches. Therefore, 979 individuals were available for this genome-wide analysis. A default set of 400,794 SNPs were used for further analysis, as recommended by Affymetrix. In quality assurance screening, we flagged SNPs with genotype call rates < 95%, minor allele frequencies (MAF) < 0.01, and SNPs showing deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) at p < 0.0001. The final set of acceptable markers included 317,859 autosomal SNPs.

The majority of genomic DNAs from Ansan cohort participants (cohort 2) were genotyped on this same panel. Where DNA samples for genotyping were inadequate (mostly owing to degradation; n = 129), DNA extracted from Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines was substituted. DNA samples with low concentration (n = 55) were amplified prior to genotyping according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN). A total of 5,020 samples were genotyped with the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 5.0 using 500 ng of genomic DNA. Markers with low call rate (<95%), low MAF (<0.01), and/or significant deviation from HWE (p < 0.0001) were excluded, leaving a total of 354,357 markers from the Ansan cohort.

Genotyping of a total of 2,304 subjects (cohort 3) as a replication study was conducted for the two strongest signals selected from the Seoul discovery sample; in addition, six other SNPs were tagged from the HapMap Japanese sample panel in International HapMap data as r2 > 0.3. These eight SNPs were genotyped by using the TaqMan reaction.17 Duplicate genotyping for about 1%–2.5% of all samples was performed as a QC check. Only those SNPs showing a concordance rate in duplicates of over 99% and a genotype success rate of over 98% were included in subsequent association analyses.

The distribution of observed p values for the given SNPs were plotted against the theoretical distribution of expected p values to construct quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots for log10(total adiponectin).18 Concentration bands (the shaded region in all Q-Q plots) represent the 95% confidence interval and were drawn by calculating the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of p values under the null hypothesis, assuming random sampling (Figure S2).

Genotype calls for the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 5.0 were determined in batches of approximately 200–300 samples under the BRLMM algorithm. In creating a cluster plot for any given SNP, total signal information was processed to generate an integrated summary file. The summary file was then translated into a cluster plot format by using an algorithm similar to SST1.0 (SNP signal tool, Affymetrix) (Figure S3).

For expression experiments, we generated four different constructs for analysis of CDH13 promoter activity. We generated the constructs composed of 0.6 or 2.7 kb promoter sequences containing −629 to +3 and −2782 to +3 of CDH13, respectively. These DNA fragments were amplified by PCR from genomic DNAs of the female donors whose genotypes were different from each other, one being TT and the other GG, for rs12444338 SNP. The forward primers were 5′-GCAAGCTCGAATTGATCTGTCAT-3′ and 5′-AAGGTTTACTGGAGCCACTCT-3′ for the 0.6 and 2.7 kb constructs, respectively. The same reverse primer, 5′-CATTTTGACCGACTAGAAGC-3′, was used for both constructs. The PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega), and an EcoRI restriction fragment of this construct was inserted into the EcoRI-digested pGLuc basic vector (NEB). This yielded the construct with Gaussian luciferase reporter gene under control of the 0.6 or 2.7 kb CDH13 promoter sequences. The authenticity of the constructs was determined by DNA sequencing of the plasmids. There was no variation in DNA sequences between T and G variant promoters except rs12444338SNP itself.

HEK293 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were plated 1 day ahead of transfection at a density of 4.0 × 105 cells/ml in six-well culture plates. For each plasmid or empty pGLuc vector (control without promoter), 500 ng was transiently cotransfected with 100 ng of β-galactosidase expression vector using polyethylenimine. Twenty-four hours posttransfection, luciferase activity was determined by using a BioLux Gaussia Luciferase Assay kit (NEB) following the manufacturer's manual and measured with a luminometer (Turner Designs). Luciferase activity was normalized against β-galactosidase activity for transfection efficiency. Three independent experiments were performed in duplicate. The values were normalized against background activity of empty vector control, and the fold difference was calculated against the T type promoter. Data were compared by two-tailed Student's t test.

All biomarkers except adiponectin appeared to be normally distributed. Therefore, only adiponectin levels were log transformed (log10). Each SNP was tested for possible effects on log10(total adiponectin) under an additive model in PLINK. Multivariate linear regression models used in the study incorporated covariates (age, sex, smoking status, and BMI). The Seoul discovery data set and two other data sets were combined via an inverse-variance meta-analysis method assuming fixed effects with Cochran's Q test used to assess between-study heterogeneity.19 All meta-analysis calculations were performed with the R program (v2.7.1). We also analyzed the combined Seoul and Ansan cohorts (n = 4,001).

The majority of individuals were middle-aged (Table 1). This sample of Korean volunteers had a low BMI on average, with only 24.1% and 0.8% of men and 26.9% and 2.5% of women having BMI values ≥ 25 kg/m2 and ≥ 30 kg/m2 (conventional cutoff points defining overweight and obese), respectively.

Table 1.

General Characteristics of Study Population

Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3
Location Seoul Ansan Bundang-gu
n 979 3,022 2,304
Males, % 56.5 52.4 55.1
Age, years 41.5 ± 8.5 54.6 ± 7.4 42.9 ± 7.8
Waist circumference, cm 81.1 ± 9.7 80.1 ± 8.6 80.1 ± 9.5
Height, cm 166.0 ± 8.5 161.8 ± 8.2 166.0 ± 8.3
Weight, kg 65.6 ± 12.1 64.6 ± 10.0 64.8 ± 11.7
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.7 ± 3.1 24.6 ± 2.9 23.4 ± 3.0
Total adiponectin, μg/ml 6.7 ± 6.4a 5.4 ± 5.0a 4.4 ± 3.3a
Log total adiponectin, μg/ml 0.82 ± 0.29 0.71 ± 0.31 0.64 ± 0.24
HMW adiponectin, μg/ml 2.7 ± 2.0
Log HMW adiponectin, μg/ml 0.32 ± 0.31
Fasting blood sugar, mg/dl 93.8 ± 16.4 99.7 ± 31.1 93.7 ± 16.7
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 120.8 ± 13.9 111.7 ± 14.1 117.8 ± 14.1
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 73.8 ± 10.4 74.9 ± 9.8 76.7 ± 11.8
HDL cholesterol, mg/dl 54.1 ± 12.8 44.9 ± 10.7 52.2 ± 12.7
LDL cholesterol, mg/dl 108.7 ± 29.2 127.7 ± 31.6 117.9 ± 30.7
Triglyceride, mg/dl 118.0 ± 93.6 141.3 ± 89.7 124.9 ± 81.9
Smoking status, %
 Ex 16.8 24.1 21.9
 Current 28.1 16.6 23.2

The following abbreviations are used: HMW, high molecular weight; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. Data shown with ± are given as mean ± standard deviation unless indicated otherwise.

a

Data given as median ± interquartile range.

Table 2 lists SNPs yielding the top 20 –log10(p values) from a linear regression model for log10(total adiponectin) in the 979 discovery set samples when the regression model included age, sex, smoking status, and BMI as covariates. Table S1 lists the next top 30 SNPs. The top SNP found to be associated with log10(total adiponectin) was rs3865188 in CDH13 (MIM 601364) on chromosome 16 (p = 1.69 × 10−15 in the Seoul sample; p = 6.58 × 10−39 in the Ansan sample; p = 2.12 × 10−32 in the Bundang-gu sample) (Figure 1). Five other SNPs in CDH13 were among the top six SNPs associated with mean log10(total adiponectin). These six SNPs in CDH13 in the original discovery sample were replicated in the Ansan cohort, showing very similar estimated regression coefficients. The major allele served as the reference allele in these regression models. In three top SNPs in CDH13, the minor allele was associated with lower log10(total adiponectin). However, the minor allele was associated with higher log10(total adiponectin) for three other SNPs in CDH13. Two top SNPs (rs3865188 and rs12596316) among these top 20 were further genotyped using the Bungdang Gu sample and gave very similar estimated regression coefficients (specifically β = −0.079 for rs3865188 and β = −0.076 for rs12596316, both of which were highly significant) (Table 3).

Table 2.

Twenty Most Strongly Associated SNPs from the Seoul Project for Log10(Total Adiponectin) Based on Linear Regression Model

Cohort 1 (n = 979)
Cohort 2 (n = 3,022)
Combined Set (n = 4,001)
Chromosome SNP Position Nearest Gene MAF Effect (μg/ml) p Value MAF Effect (μg/ml) p Value Effect (μg/ml) p Value
16 rs3865188 81208218 CDH13 0.309 −0.095 1.685 × 10−15 0.296 −0.096 6.582 × 10−39 −0.096 7.793 × 10−51
16 rs12596316 81203653 CDH13 0.311 −0.088 4.763 × 10−13 0.298 −0.096 1.731 × 10−37 −0.094 8.287 × 10−47
16 rs7193788 81213661 CDH13 0.470 −0.057 3.643 × 10−07 0.449 −0.071 6.304 × 10−24 −0.068 2.484 × 10−28
16 rs3865186 81204473 CDH13 0.448 0.057 5.844 × 10−07 0.458 0.063 9.984 × 10−19 0.062 1.634 × 10−23
16 rs3852724 81203595 CDH13 0.448 0.057 6.225 × 10−07 0.458 0.063 6.727 × 10−19 0.062 1.046 × 10−23
16 rs3865185 81203963 CDH13 0.448 0.057 6.225 × 10−07 0.458 0.064 4.621 × 10−19 0.062 7.568 × 10−24
3 rs1438545 106535094 ALCAM 0.105 0.089 6.286 × 10−07 0.086 −0.014 0.2577 0.029 0.006585
1 rs12072620 188794697 FAM5C 0.177 −0.074 0.0000009 0.166 0.008 0.4387 −0.011 0.1741
1 rs1501501 188795068 FAM5C 0.177 −0.074 0.0000009 0.166 0.007 0.4664 −0.012 0.1629
13 rs4943398 36083064 LOC400120 0.217 −0.064 0.0000029 0.227 −0.020 0.02218 −0.032 0.00002418
11 rs4936310 110405970 C11orf53 0.229 0.066 0.0000043 0.182 0.018 0.04669 0.035 0.00001446
8 rs436753 88599977 CNBD1 0.318 0.063 0.0000063 0.268 −0.014 0.08527 0.006 0.3774
14 rs7148411 19629122 OR4K17 0.230 0.063 0.0000099 0.245 −0.008 0.3319 0.008 0.2529
12 rs17251474 91089449 BTG1 0.198 −0.064 0.0000114 0.195 0.008 0.3818 −0.010 0.1821
5 rs17156226 103533627 NUDT12 0.204 0.068 0.0000119 0.164 0.003 0.7811 0.026 0.002127
15 rs7171526 60497216 FLJ38723 0.118 −0.078 0.0000119 0.114 0.008 0.4576 −0.010 0.3096
8 rs10957333 66104003 CYP7B1 0.106 −0.080 0.0000163 0.106 −0.001 0.9349 −0.019 0.05887
1 rs2889921 220406261 KIAA1822L 0.167 −0.087 0.0000194 0.183 −0.018 0.05355 −0.036 0.00002391
4 rs11722604 157084201 CTSO 0.192 0.077 0.0000231 0.071 0.004 0.7631 0.052 0.000006402
10 rs2817677 98811818 SLIT1 0.229 −0.058 0.0000234 0.214 0.000 0.9617 −0.012 0.1117

Table lists the minor allele frequency (MAF), estimated effect size (β) for the 20 most significant SNPs identified from the Seoul cohort (cohort 1; n = 979), and their p values in a multiple linear regression model considering age, sex, smoking status, and body mass index under an additive model. MAF, estimated effect size (β), and p value for the Ansan cohort (cohort 2) are also shown.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Significance of SNPs in CDH13 for All Three Cohorts

Discovery set, n = 979; replication set 1, n = 3,022; replication set 2, n = 2,034. Here, a linear regression model including age, gender, smoking status, and body mass index was used for each individual SNP. Top panel: plot showing the −log10(p value). Black, red, and white symbols represent data from the discovery study, replication set 1, and replication set 2, respectively. Bottom panel: plot showing the recombination rate (blue) and cumulative recombination rate measured away from the most highly associated SNP of rs3865188 (yellow). Positions of highly significant SNPs were upstream of CDH13.

Table 3.

Two Most Strongly Associated SNPs from the Seoul Project for Log10(Total Adiponectin) Based on Linear Regression Model and Meta-analysis Results in 6,305 Samples

SNP Seoul
Ansan
Bundang-gu
Meta-analysis Effect Size (μg/ml) Meta-analysis p Value Meta-analysis Heterogeneity Q (p)
Effect Size (SE) (μg/ml) Effect Size (SE) (μg/ml) Effect Size (SE) (μg/ml)
rs3865188 −0.095 (0.0118) −0.096 (0.0073) −0.079 (0.0066) −0.09 2.82 × 10−83 3.58 (0.167)
rs12596316 −0.088 (0.012) −0.096 (0.0074) −0.076 (0.0065) −0.09 3.09 × 10−77 4.13 (0.1268)

p values were calculated under a linear regression under an additive model incorporating age, sex, smoking status, and body mass index as covariates. Effect sizes are given with standard error (SE).

BMI was omitted as a covariate in the regression model, and these results are presented in Table S2. SNP rs3865188 in CDH13 was still among the top SNPs, although strength of association became a bit weaker (p = 2.3 × 10−12). The other five SNPs in CDH13 were still among the top 20 SNPs associated with log10(total adiponectin). The p value for rs3865188 combined across all three data sets was 3.33 × 10−76 when BMI was omitted (see Table S3).

We also tested these two SNPs for association with high-molecular-weight adiponectin as a separate phenotype using the 2,304 replication samples from a third cohort (Table 4). Six additional SNPs flanking rs3865188 and rs12596316 were also included in this replication analysis (Figure S4). The association between high-molecular-weight adiponectin and rs3865188 was even stronger (p = 7.36 × 10−58) than seen with log10(total adiponectin). Another SNP, rs4783244, was also very significantly associated with high-molecular-weight adiponectin (p = 5.72 × 10−61) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Association of SNPs in CDH13 with Log10(Total Adiponectin) and Log10(High-Molecular-Weight Adiponectin) Based on Linear Regression Model in 2,304 Korean Adults in the Bundang-gu Sample

Total Adiponectin
High-Molecular-Weight Adiponectin
SNP Position MAF Effect p Value Effect p Value
rs17244777 81159584 0.232 −0.025 0.00069 −0.05 8.17 × 10−8
rs7200895 81202107 0.459 0.035 2.05 × 10−8 0.069 5.31 × 10−18
rs12596316 81203653 0.305 −0.076 1.08 × 10−30 −0.13 8.30 × 10−55
rs3865188 81208218 0.298 −0.079 2.12 × 10−32 −0.315 7.36 × 10−58
rs7204454 81216695 0.352 −0.053 1.78 × 10−16 −0.084 5.05 × 10−25
rs4783244 81219769 0.299 −0.079 2.74 × 10−33 −0.138 5.72 × 10−61
rs8047711 81225172 0.194 −0.067 3.15 × 10−17 −0.112 3.47 × 10−29
rs12922394 81229828 0.212 −0.043 1.19 × 10−8 −0.073 2.66 × 10−14

p values were calculated under a linear regression under an additive model, incorporating age, sex, smoking status, and body mass index as covariates.

As a first step in understanding the underlying mechanism for genotype AA of rs3865188 with higher adiponectin level at a molecular level, we hypothesized that this SNP may be in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with another variant that controls the promoter activity of CDH13, and DNA sequences containing the A allele may have higher transcriptional activity than those with the T allele based on its position in the genomic sequences. We tested this hypothesis by comparing promoter activities with both alleles controlling reporter gene expression in transient transfection experiments. We selected the rs12444338 SNP, which is in strong LD with rs3865188 and is located 543 bp upstream of the transcription start site for CDH13. The promoter activity of the G variant occurring with the A allele at rs3865188 was 1.6 ± 0.2, and this is 2.2-fold higher than that of the T variant for the 0.6 and 2.7 kb promoters, respectively (Figure S5). This result suggests that the G variant at rs12444338 has a strongly increased promoter activity in vitro.

Table S4 lists SNPs yielding the top 20 –log10(p values) from this linear regression model for mean log10(total adiponectin) in the 3,022 Ansan subjects when the regression model included age, sex, smoking status, and BMI as covariates (Figure S6). Three SNPs in ADIPOQ were among the top 20 SNPs associated with mean log10(total adiponectin). Among these three SNPs, two SNPs (rs2241767 and rs266733) were replicated in the 979 Seoul samples. The most significant SNP in ADIPOQ influencing mean log10(total adiponectin) was rs2241767 (p = 3.29 × 10−8 in the 3,022 Ansan sample; p = 0.0012 in the 979 Seoul sample). We also examined SNPs in ADIPOQ from our genome-wide marker panel in the combined sample (Seoul and Ansan cohorts combined had n = 4,001). Two of these three SNPs gave p values at or near genome-wide significance in the combined sample (rs2241767, p = 6.72 × 10−10; rs864265, p = 1.37 × 10−7), and four other SNPs gave nominally significant evidence of an effect on log10(total adiponectin) (Figure 2). There were a total of eight SNPs in the genome-wide marker panel, and we imputed ∼16 additional SNPs by using PLINK with the HapMap Chinese/Japanese sample as the reference population to provide better coverage of this gene. Figure 2 summarizes results of this analysis of SNPs in ADPIOQ.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

–log10(p Value) for both Imputed and Genotyped SNPs in ADIPOQ in 4,001 Korean Adults

Red dots are genotyped SNPs; open blue squares are imputed SNPs.

In a cohort of 979 subjects from Seoul genotyped with the Affymetrix Human SNP Array 5.0 marker panel, linear regression models incorporating age, gender, smoking status, and BMI as covariates identified six SNPs in CDH13 as significantly associated with log10(total adiponectin) levels. A second cohort of 3,022 adults genotyped on this same platform also showed significant effects from these same six SNPs (achieving genome-wide significance with identical direction of effect). A third replication cohort of 2,304 Koreans also showed similar regression coefficients for log10(total adiponectin) and even stronger effects when levels of high-molecular weight adiponectin were analyzed.

The cadherin 13 preprotein (CDH13; also known as T-cadherin) gene spans 1.2 Mb and contains 14 exons. CDH13 has been reported as an adiponectin receptor.20,21 The most significant SNP, rs3865188, is located 17.9 kb upstream of CDH13 itself. T-cadherin was identified as a receptor for the hexameric and high-molecular-weight species of adiponectin, but not for the trimeric or globular species.20 T-cadherin is expressed in endothelial and smooth muscle cells, where it may interact with adiponectin. Although transcriptional regulation of CDH13 is not well understood, evidence that a nucleotide variant in the promoter region is associated with increased promoter activity of CDH13 suggests that this variant plays an important role in expression. Furthermore, we showed that the variants in LD with the promoter are positively associated with adiponectin levels. Thus, our findings suggest that level of the receptor, CDH13, may regulate adiponectin level.

Several GWAS in Western countries have reported that ADIPOQ exerts a major effect on plasma adiponectin levels.6,9,10 Ling et al. recently reported a genome-wide study showing that SNPs within ADIPOQ gave the strongest evidence of association with adiponectin levels (p < 10−7).9 Another recent GWAS also reported that ADIPOQ showed the strongest association with adiponectin levels (p = 4.3 × 10−24).10 In the present study, five SNPs in ADIPOQ were associated with serum total adiponectin at a more modest p value (p = 1.45 × 10−8) in the Ansan sample; however, some of the SNPs were not replicated in the smaller Seoul sample (Table S4).

The present study showed a weaker association for SNPs in ADIPOQ with adiponectin levels but much stronger association for SNPs in CDH13 with adiponectin levels than in previous studies in Western populations. A recent GWAS reported a SNP in CDH13 gave the fourth strongest test of association (p < 2 × 10−5), which was a much weaker association than our results.9 One possible reason is the differences in allele frequency of these SNPs in CDH13. In the case of rs3865188, allele frequency information obtained from HapMap samples showed that European populations were more polymorphic than Asian populations at this marker.

In the present study, the association of SNPs in CDH13 became even stronger when high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels were used, as compared with total adiponectin levels. Recent studies have demonstrated that the high-molecular-weight multimer form of adiponectin is the active form of this protein.22 This high-molecular-weight form is most active in suppression of hepatic glucose production.22 Kobayashi et al. reported that only high-molecular-weight adiponectin selectively suppressed endothelial cell apoptosis, whereas neither the middle- nor the low-molecular-weight form of adiponectin had such an effect.23

The strength of our study lies in our assessment of a unique physiologic measure of adiposity (serum adiponectin) in an Asian population. We also measured high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels in one sample. We adjusted for potential confounders, including age, sex, smoking status, and BMI. When BMI was included as a covariate, rs3865188 in CDH13 was still among the top SNPs, with even stronger evidence. The question of whether or not findings from these studies can be generalized to all populations remains uncertain. Western populations have both different genetic backgrounds and different dietary patterns. Genetic studies of adiposity in Asian populations may not necessarily identify the same set of susceptibility genes as those in European-derived populations. However, these three Korean cohorts show strong evidence that CDH13 on chromosome 16 is associated with serum adiponectin levels.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Seoul R&BD Program (10526) and was partially supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A000385).

Contributor Information

Sun Ha Jee, Email: jsunha@yuhs.ac.

Yangsoo Jang, Email: jangys1212@yuhs.ac.

Supplemental Data

Document S1. Six Figures and Five Tables
mmc1.pdf (515.5KB, pdf)

Web Resources

The URLs for data presented herein are as follows:

References

  • 1.Yamauchi T., Kamon J., Waki H., Terauchi Y., Kubota N., Hara K., Mori Y., Ide T., Murakami K., Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N. The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity. Nat. Med. 2001;7:941–946. doi: 10.1038/90984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hotta K., Funahashi T., Arita Y., Takahashi M., Matsuda M., Okamoto Y., Iwahashi H., Kuriyama H., Ouchi N., Maeda K. Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000;20:1595–1599. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.6.1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Díez J.J., Iglesias P. The role of the novel adipocyte-derived hormone adiponectin in human disease. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2003;148:293–300. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1480293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oh D.K., Ciaraldi T., Henry R.R. Adiponectin in health and disease. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2007;9:282–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lara-Castro C., Luo N., Wallace P., Klein R.L., Garvey W.T. Adiponectin multimeric complexes and the metabolic syndrome trait cluster. Diabetes. 2006;55:249–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Henneman P., Aulchenko Y.S., Frants R.R., Zorkoltseva I.V., Zillikens M.C., Frolich M., Oostra B.A., van Dijk K.W., van Duijn C.M. Genetic architecture of plasma adiponectin overlaps with the genetics of metabolic syndrome-related traits. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:908–913. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization (2000). Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series number 894 (Geneva: World Health Organization). [PubMed]
  • 8.Klein S., Burke L.E., Bray G.A., Blair S., Allison D.B., Pi-Sunyer X., Hong Y., Eckel R.H., American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Clinical implications of obesity with specific focus on cardiovascular disease: A statement for professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2004;110:2952–2967. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145546.97738.1E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ling H., Waterworth D.M., Stirnadel H.A., Pollin T.I., Barter P.J., Kesäniemi Y.A., Mahley R.W., McPherson R., Waeber G., Bersot T.P. Genome-wide linkage and association analyses to identify genes influencing adiponectin levels: The GEMS Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:737–744. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heid I.M., Henneman P., Hicks A., Coassin S., Winkler T., Aulchenko Y.S., Fuchsberger C., Song K., Hivert M.F., Waterworth D.M. Clear detection of ADIPOQ locus as the major gene for plasma adiponectin: Results of genome-wide association analyses including 4659 European individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208:412–420. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.11.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richards J.B., Waterworth D., O'Rahilly S., Hivert M.F., Loos R.J., Perry J.R., Tanaka T., Timpson N.J., Semple R.K., Soranzo N., GIANT Consortium A genome-wide association study reveals variants in ARL15 that influence adiponectin levels. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Deurenberg P., Yap M., van Staveren W.A. Body mass index and percent body fat: A meta analysis among different ethnic groups. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1998;22:1164–1171. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sull J.W., Kim H.J., Yun J.E., Kim G., Park E.J., Kim S., Lee H.Y., Jee S.H. Serum adiponectin is associated with family history of diabetes independently of obesity and insulin resistance in healthy Korean men and women. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2009;160:39–43. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoon S.J., Lee H.S., Lee S.W., Yun J.E., Kim S.Y., Cho E.R., Lee S.J., Jee E.J., Lee H.Y., Park J. The association between adiponectin and diabetes in the Korean population. Metabolism. 2008;57:853–857. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cho Y.S., Go M.J., Kim Y.J., Heo J.Y., Oh J.H., Ban H.J., Yoon D., Lee M.H., Kim D.J., Park M. A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:527–534. doi: 10.1038/ng.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jee S.H., Lee S., Min S., Park J., Kim H.S., Kim S.Y., Yun J.E., Lee S.J., Jee E.J., Lee H.Y. Development of ELISA-kit of quantitative analysis for adiponectin and their correlation with cardiovascular risk factors. Korean J. Epidemiol. 2007;29:165–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hui L., DelMonte T., Ranade K. Genotyping using the TaqMan assay. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 2008;56:2.10.1–2.10.8. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0210s56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hyndman R.J., Fan Y. Sample quantiles in statistical packages. Am. Stat. 1996;50:361–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ioannidis J.P., Patsopoulos N.A., Evangelou E. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of genome-wide association investigations. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hug C., Wang J., Ahmad N.S., Bogan J.S., Tsao T.S., Lodish H.F. T-cadherin is a receptor for hexameric and high-molecular-weight forms of Acrp30/adiponectin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10308–10313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403382101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hebbard L.W., Garlatti M., Young L.J., Cardiff R.D., Oshima R.G., Ranscht B. T-cadherin supports angiogenesis and adiponectin association with the vasculature in a mouse mammary tumor model. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1407–1416. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Waki H., Yamauchi T., Kamon J., Ito Y., Uchida S., Kita S., Hara K., Hada Y., Vasseur F., Froguel P. Impaired multimerization of human adiponectin mutants associated with diabetes. Molecular structure and multimer formation of adiponectin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:40352–40363. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300365200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kobayashi H., Ouchi N., Kihara S., Walsh K., Kumada M., Abe Y., Funahashi T., Matsuzawa Y. Selective suppression of endothelial cell apoptosis by the high molecular weight form of adiponectin. Circ. Res. 2004;94:e27–e31. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000119921.86460.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Six Figures and Five Tables
mmc1.pdf (515.5KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES