Abstract
Splice modulation using antisense oligonucleotides (AOs) has been shown to yield targeted exon exclusion to restore the open reading frame and generate truncated but partially functional dystrophin protein. This has been successfully demonstrated in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice and in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients. However, DMD is a systemic disease; successful therapeutic exploitation of this approach will therefore depend on effective systemic delivery of AOs to all affected tissues. We have previously shown the potential of a muscle-specific/arginine-rich chimeric peptide-phosphorodiamidate morpholino (PMO) conjugate, but its long-term activity, optimized dosing regimen, capacity for functional correction and safety profile remain to be established. Here, we report the results of this chimeric peptide-PMO conjugate in the mdx mouse using low doses (3 and 6 mg/kg) administered via a 6 biweekly systemic intravenous injection protocol. We show 100% dystrophin-positive fibers and near complete correction of the dystrophin transcript defect in all peripheral muscle groups, with restoration of 50% dystrophin protein over 12 weeks, leading to correction of the DMD pathological phenotype and restoration of muscle function in the absence of detectable toxicity or immune response. Chimeric muscle-specific/cell-penetrating peptides therefore represent highly promising agents for systemic delivery of splice-correcting PMO oligomers for DMD therapy.
Introduction
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe muscle degenerative disorder resulting from loss-of-function mutations in the DMD gene that lead to disruption of the open reading frame and the absence of functional dystrophin protein.1 Splice modulation using antisense oligonucleotides (AOs) offers a potential therapy for DMD by permitting targeted exon exclusion in the DMD pre-mRNA to restore the open reading frame in mutant DMD transcripts.2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 This results in the production of truncated but partially functional dystrophin isoforms that retain the critical domains.14,15 The therapeutic potential of this method has been successfully shown in human subjects following local intramuscular AO injection.9,16
Given that DMD is a systemic disease affecting all peripheral skeletal muscles, successful AO-mediated splice-correction therapy will be critically dependent on effective systemic AO delivery to all affected tissues. Systemic delivery of both 2′-O-methyl phosphorothioate and phosphorodiamidate morpholino (PMO) AOs has been shown to restore dystrophin protein expression in multiple peripheral muscles in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice but with low efficiency.5,7,17 Recently several groups have shown that the systemic delivery of neutrally charged PMO AOs can be significantly enhanced by direct PMO conjugation to positively charged, arginine-rich, cell-penetrating peptides.12,18,19,20 All studies reported significant body-wide dystrophin protein restoration in multiple muscle groups at lower peptide-PMO conjugate doses, with some limited correction in cardiac muscle, and with amelioration of the mdx dystrophic phenotype.
These studies have highlighted the potential of peptide-PMO conjugates as therapeutic agents for DMD. However, they have yet to explore the full range of peptide design space or methods for specific peptide targeting of muscle and heart. We have recently reported the potential of a new class of chimeric peptides incorporating a muscle-specific domain between the arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide domain and PMO sequence, the prototype being B-MSP-PMO.21 This chimeric peptide incorporated the arginine-rich B peptide12,18 fused to a muscle-specific heptapeptide (MSP).22 The activity of this peptide-PMO conjugate was critically dependent on design of the chimeric peptide (B-MSP was highly effective whereas MSP-B was not) and offered enhanced dystrophin splice correction over the corresponding B-PMO conjugate lacking the MSP domain. To fully explore the potential of such novel chimeric peptide-PMOs as candidate therapeutic agents for DMD, a series of important questions need to be addressed including; the establishment of an optimal dosing regimen, the long-term or cumulative effects of repeated peptide-PMO delivery on the restoration of dystrophin protein and function, and any possible toxicity/immune response elicited by the chimeric peptide. Here, we report the results in which a very low dose, multi-injection regimen provided near complete systemic dystrophin correction and phenotypic reversal in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice in the absence of detectable toxicity or immune response.
Results
B-MSP-PMO provides cumulative correction of the mdx mouse phenotype at low dose
Previously, we have demonstrated that multiple doses as low as 3 mg/kg could induce successful exon skipping and the detection of large numbers of dystrophin-positive fibers in body-wide muscles in mdx mice, albeit with relatively low overall levels of dystrophin protein.21 However, the literature suggests that dystrophin has a long half-life of ~6 months,23,24 and we therefore reasoned that it might be possible to establish an effective treatment regimen with repeated, multiple low-dose administrations. To test the ability of the B-MSP-PMO AO to provide cumulative molecular correction in the mdx mouse, we began using 3-mg/kg dose injections, comparing single with multiple intravenous 3 mg/kg doses administered biweekly over the course of 12 weeks. One week following the final injection tissue samples from multiple skeletal muscles and the heart were harvested for protein and RNA analysis. Overall, greater levels of dystrophin expression were detected in the multidose-treated animals (Figure 1a). A remarkable difference was observed in the number of dystrophin-positive fibers detected in biceps, triceps, and quadriceps between the multiple- and single-dose injections, with up to 74.6, 21.8, and 33.8% positive myofibers in multi-injection versus 18.3, 1.7, and 6% following single injections, as determined by immunohistochemical staining (Figure 1b). This analysis showed that dystrophin correction was variable between muscle groups, with significantly improved correction in most but not all groups. These findings were corroborated at the RNA level, where reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis showed enhanced but incomplete splice correction with 3 mg/kg multi-injections compared with single injections (Figure 1c). Western blot data was also consistent with these findings showing restored dystrophin protein in all muscles including diaphragm, but with the exception of heart (Figure 1d). However, the levels of detectable dystrophin protein were not >5% of wild-type C57BL6 mouse normal levels in the multi-injection group, with less protein detectable following single injections (data not shown). Despite these relatively low levels of dystrophin correction following the multidose 3 mg/kg injection protocol, lower serum creatinine kinase (CK) and serum aspartate aminotransferase enzymes were detected (Supplementary Figure S1a,b), indicative of a degree of correction of the muscle pathology. In addition, grip strength tests showed significant improvement in muscle function in the treated mdx mice compared with untreated mdx controls (Supplementary Figure S1c).
Cumulative, enhanced molecular and phenotypic correction of mdx mice following intravenous 6 mg/kg multidose B-MSP-PMO injections
The data above showed that a multidose regimen for intravenous B-MSP-PMO administration was promising and could lead to appreciable cumulative dystrophin correction in mdx mice. We hypothesized that a critical dose threshold was probably required in order to induce effective dystrophin correction and therefore investigated a higher dose, multi-injection protocol. Using an intravenous dose of 6 mg/kg of B-MSP-PMO administered biweekly over the course of 12 weeks, we found virtually complete dystrophin splice correction at the RNA level in all examined muscles, with the exception of heart. Multidose compared with single 6 mg/kg B-MSP-PMO injections resulted in significant correction of dystrophin expression levels in multiple peripheral muscle groups (Figure 2a). Hundred percentage of myofibers were dystrophin-positive in all muscle groups except heart treated with multiple 6 mg/kg B-MSP-PMO injections, suggesting that a cumulative effect was established following multidose treatment at the higher dose (Figure 2b). This was corroborated by the RT-PCR analysis, which showed the absence of uncorrected dystrophin transcript in all tissues analyzed except heart and abdominal muscle (Figure 2c), indicating complete removal of the mutated exon 23 from the defective DMD transcript. This led to increased absolute levels of dystrophin protein as determined by western blot with up to 60% of normal dystrophin protein levels detectable in quadriceps and triceps as measured by Image J software analysis (Figure 2d).
Unsurprisingly, such effective dystrophin splice correction at the molecular level led to phenotypic recovery of treated mdx mice. This was shown by functional improvement of the treated mdx mouse muscle as shown by grip strength analysis (Figure 3a).25,26 In addition, molecular correction was reflected in terms of single-muscle fiber resistance to damage as demonstrated by physiological analysis of isolated extensor digitorum longus muscles, which showed increased maximum force and decreased percent force drop in multidose 6 mg/kg treated mice compared with age-matched mdx controls (Supplementary Figure S2). The percentage of muscle fibers with centrally located nuclei is an index of ongoing degeneration/regeneration cycles.27,28 Counts of centrally located nuclei within treated mdx muscle groups (tibialis anterior, biceps, and quadriceps) revealed a significant reduction in centrally nucleated myofibers compared with untreated control mdx mice, suggesting a reduced regenerative stimulus commensurate with improved function (Figure 3b). A significant decline in serum CK levels was also observed in mice treated with multiple 6 mg/kg doses compared with untreated mdx mice (Figure 3c).27 Dystrophin is an essential component of a sarcolemmal dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC), which has important signaling functions via neuronal nitric oxide synthase and other molecular components.29 In the absence of functional dystrophin, DAPC components fail to localize accurately to the sarcolemma. We therefore investigated whether successful relocalization of DAPC components was present after cumulative restoration of dystrophin. Relocalization of multiple DAPC component proteins including β-dystroglycan, α-sarcoglycan, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase, was detected following multidose B-MSP-PMO treatment as shown by serial immunostaining of dystrophin and DAPC components (Figure 3d).
Repeated B-MSP-PMO treatment restores functional dystrophin expression in the absence of detectable toxicity or immune response
The 6 mg/kg multidose injection protocol above led to near complete dystrophin splice correction in multiple muscle groups. Given this impressive phenotypic correction, we wished to determine whether any side-effects of treatment occurred. We monitored the body weight of mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO conjugate at 6 mg/kg multidose injections over the course of 12 weeks. Treated mice showed a steady weight increase to the experimental end point as did with untreated age-matched controls (Supplementary Figure S3). We also investigated any potential systemic cytotoxicity induced by the repeated treatment with B-MSP-PMO by analyzing serum indexes of liver and kidney damage and function including serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase liver enzymes levels. The serum levels of these enzymes were reduced to within the normal range compared with untreated mdx mice and normal age-matched C57BL6 control mice (Figure 4a). No change was found in the serum levels of urea and creatinine with B-MSP-PMO treatment compared with untreated mdx controls and normal mice (data not shown), suggesting no adverse effects of treatment on renal function. We also undertook histological studies with haematoxylin and eosin staining of liver and kidney tissue sections from mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO conjugate, which revealed no deleterious changes in tissue morphology or increased numbers of infiltrating cells compared with untreated mdx mice (Figure 4b). Also there was no increase in the number of other inflammatory infiltrating cells (e.g., macrophage and neutrophil) in muscle sections from mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO in comparison with untreated controls (Supplementary Figure S4a).
Given the striking cumulative effect of dystrophin restoration with multidose of B-MSP-PMO conjugate at 3 and 6 mg/kg, respectively as above, this suggests that B-MSP-PMO is unlikely to induce a significant immune response following repeated administration. This was first tested by immunostaining of CD3+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in muscle tissue sections. Sporadic CD3+ and CD8+ cells were observed in diaphragmatic cross-sections from mice treated with B-MSP-PMO conjugate, however increased numbers were found in untreated mdx controls (Figure 4c; Supplementary Figure S4b), suggesting that B-MSP-PMO lacks immunogenicity. In order to detect any specific humoral immune response in the serum from repeated B-MSP-PMO-treated mdx mice, we coated the B-MSP-PMO conjugate on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates as an antigen, and probed with serum collected from B-MSP-PMO-treated mdx mice and untreated controls to detect any B-MSP-PMO-specific antibody in serum. Using this assay, only background levels of signal were observed in the treated and untreated controls (Figure 4d), consistent with the functional improvement and phenotypic correction induced in B-MSP-PMO-treated mdx mice. Overall, these results indicated that repeated B-MSP-PMO administration failed to elicit any overt toxicity or significant immune response at the dosing regimen utilized.
Discussion
Peptide-conjugated PMO oligomers have significant potential as splice correcting therapeutic agents for DMD.12,19,20,30 However, the ability of such agents to incorporate muscle-specific peptides and to provide cumulative molecular and functional correction of the DMD phenotype has not yet been shown. Here, we report studies investigating the therapeutic potential of the novel chimeric peptide-PMO conjugate B-MSP-PMO. We show that while a multi-injection 3 mg/kg intravenous administration regimen was slightly more effective than single injections at this dose in terms of dystrophin restoration, it failed to reach the critical dose threshold required for high-level correction in mdx mice. Variation of dystrophin expression between different muscles can be observed with single intravenous injection of B-MSP-PMO (Figure 1b), which indicates that at marginal doses local factors within individual muscle groups might influence AO uptake and/or efficiency. In contrast, a higher dose of 6 mg/kg administered biweekly for 6 weeks resulted in complete molecular correction of the dystrophin defect at the RNA level and in terms of numbers of dystrophin-positive myofibers in multiple peripheral muscle groups including diaphragm. This resulted in cumulative correction of molecular and pathological features associated with the mdx phenotype including decreased serum CK levels, restored DAPC localization, improved grip function, and other physiological parameters, in the absence of detectable immune response or toxicity. The mechanism for this improved activity appears to be related to increased muscle cell uptake or internalization of the PMO conjugate as demonstrated by our recent study (data not shown). Chimeric muscle-specific peptides conjugated to PMO AOs therefore have significant potential as therapeutic agents for systemic splice correction in DMD.
Two major questions arise in the use of peptide PMO conjugates for dystrophin restoration. The first is to what extent muscle function is restored and ongoing muscle degenerative pathology is halted or reversed. At the 6 mg/kg, repeat dose the restored dystrophin protein is functional as evidenced by efficient restoration of the dystrophin network of proteins at the sarcolemma (the DAPC) and improved mdx muscle grip strength and single-muscle fiber resistance to damage to within the normal range. Multiple indexes of disease pathology including serum CK levels, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase and routine muscle histology all showed significant reversal of disease progression. Although the percentage of centrally nucleated myofibers in treated samples remained high, there was significant decrease compared with untreated mdx controls, which indicated the progression of the disease pathology was significantly altered. The data was corroborated by the absence or low numbers of regenerating fibers and significantly decreased amount of collagen deposition detected in treated samples (Supplementary Figure S4c–e). The second question relates to safety and potential immunotoxicity of the peptide PMO compound. At the multidose regimen used in this study all indexes of organ or immunotoxicity were negative including serum indexes of hepatic and renal function within the normal range, normal liver and kidney histology, no accumulation of infiltrating CD3+/CD8+T lymphocytes and macrophages/neutrophils within tissues and no evidence by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of serum antibodies directed against the B-MSP-PMO conjugate. During the study, the treated mdx mice showed the same pattern of weight gain as untreated age-matched controls. Therefore low dose, repeated administration of this B-MSP-PMO compound provides virtually complete correction of dystrophin expression in all peripheral muscle groups and this correlates with functional correction of muscle physiology and reversal of pathological indicators in the absence of detectable immunotoxicity.
The data presented therefore suggest that B-MSP-PMO has significant potential as a therapeutic agent for the long-term treatment of the dystrophin muscle defect in patients with DMD. This work is a prelude to even longer term studies (1–2 years) to ascertain the effects of lifetime correction of dystrophin deficiency in mdx mice, and provides strong evidence for the use of such chimeric peptide PMO conjugates as therapeutic agents in DMD patients. That relatively poor dystrophin correction was found in heart is consistent with our previous report identifying this chimeric peptide PMO conjugate,21 in which we have shown only a slightly higher level of dystrophin expression in heart with B-MSP-PMO compared with the parent B-PMO compound at a 25 mg/kg dose. Our speculation is that the low level of dystrophin splice correction in heart is most likely due to the high affinity of MSP for skeletal muscle and the low-dose regimen used in this study. Nevertheless, the opportunity now exists to identify different or improved versions of the MSP tissue-specific domain including cardiac-specific peptides, and the study of such conjugated PMOs is already in progress (data not shown).
Materials and Methods
Animals. Six to eight-week-old mdx mice were used in all experiments (six mice each in the test and control groups). The experiments were carried out in the Animal Unit, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK) according to procedures authorized by the UK Home Office. Mice were killed by CO2 inhalation at desired time points, and muscles and other tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane and stored at −80 °C.
PMO and peptide-PMO conjugates. Peptide-conjugated PMOs were synthesized and purified to >90% purity by AVI Biopharma (Corvallis, OR). The nomenclature and sequences of this B-MSP-PMO conjugate is (RXRRBR)2-ASSLNIAX-PMO. The PMO AO 5′-ggccaaacctcggcttacctgaaat-3′ was targeted to the murine dystrophin exon 23/intron 23 boundary site. MSP is a muscle-specific heptapeptide, previously identified by in vivo phage display as having increased muscle- and cardiac-binding properties.22 B peptide is a derivative of a previously described arginine-rich peptide (RXR)418,30 in which two of the non-natural 6-aminohexanoic acid (X) residues were substituted with non-natural amino acid β-alanine. B-MSP is a chimeric peptide of B and MSP with the MSP positioned at the C-terminus of the B peptide. The PMO was conjugated to the carboxyl groups at the C-terminus of the peptide using a method described elsewhere.18,30
RNA extraction and nested RT-PCR analysis. Total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen, Renfrew, UK) and 200 ng of RNA template was used for 20 µl RT-PCR with OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK). The primer sequences and reaction conditions were used as previously reported.11,12 The first step RT-PCR was carried out with the OneStep RT-PCR kit with 25 cycles for PCR step and another 25 cycles was applied for the following nested PCR. The products were examined by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel.
Systemic injections of peptide–PMO conjugates. Various amounts of peptide-PMO conjugate in 80 µl saline buffer were injected into tail vein of mdx mice at the final dose of 3 and 6 mg/kg, respectively.
Immunohistochemistry and histology. Series of 8-µm sections were examined for dystrophin expression and DAPC with a series of polyclonal antibodies and monoclonal antibodies as described.12 CD3+/CD8+ T lymphocytes cell were identified with rat polyclonal31 and mouse monoclonal primary antibody (eBioscience, Hatfield, UK), respectively; then detected by goat-anti-rat and goat-anti-mouse immunoglobulin Gs Alexa 594 (Invitrogen). For macrophage and neutrophil staining, polyclonal rabbit and rat primary antibodies from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) were used, respectively. Collagen IV polyclonal rabbit primary antibody was applied for collagen staining (Abcam) and Image J software analysis was used for quantification. For detecting regenerating muscle fibers, mouse fetal myosin antibody was used, which was a gift from Professor Neal A. Rubinstein (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). Goat-anti-rabbit, -rat and -mouse immunoglobulin Gs Alexa 594 secondary antibodies were applied, respectively (Invitrogen). Routine haematoxylin and eosin staining was used to examine overall liver and kidney morphology.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serum antibody detection. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was adopted from a previously published method.18 The serum from treated and untreated mdx mice was collected at the end point. Plates were coated with 1 µg B-MSP-PMO conjugate, incubated at 4 °C overnight, washed, blocked with normal goat serum and incubated with serum from C57BL6 mice and the treated mdx mice in serial dilutions for 1 hour. The plates were then incubated with goat-anti-mouse immunoglobulin G horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, Hertfordshire, UK) for 30 minutes. The substrate was applied for 10–30 minutes and the reaction was terminated by the stop solution from the Substrate Pack (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The signal intensity was measured by the plate reader (PerkinElmer, Beaconsfield, UK).
Centrally nucleated fiber counts. Tibialis anterior, quadriceps, and triceps muscles from mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO conjugate were examined. To ascertain the number of centrally nucleated muscle fibers, sections were stained for dystrophin with rabbit polyclonal antibody 2166 and counter-stained with DAPI for cell nuclei (Sigma). 500–1,000 dystrophin-positive fibers for each tissue sample were randomly chosen, counted and assessed for the presence of central nuclei using a Zeiss AxioVision fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Herts, UK). Fibers were judged centrally nucleated if one or more nuclei were not located at the periphery of the fiber. Untreated age-matched mdx mice were used as controls.
Protein extraction and western blot. Protein extraction and western blot were carried out as previously described.12 Various amounts of protein from normal C57BL6 mice as a positive control and corresponding amounts of protein from muscles of treated or untreated mdx mice were used. α-Actinin was used as loading control. The intensity of the bands obtained from treated mdx muscles was measured by Image J software; the quantification is based on band intensity and area, and is compared with that from normal muscles of C57BL6 mice.
Functional grip strength and physiological analysis. Treated and control mice were tested using a commercial grip strength monitor (Chatillon, West Sussex, UK). The procedure is the same as previously described.12 Each mouse was held 2 cm from the base of the tail, allowed to grip a protruding metal triangle bar attached to the apparatus with their forepaws, and pulled gently until they released their grip. The force exerted was recorded and five sequential tests were carried out for each mouse, averaged at 30 seconds apart. Subsequently the readings for force recovery were normalized by the body weight. For isolated muscle fiber physiological analysis, the extensor digitorum longus muscle was used as reported,32 and contractile properties determined using previous methods.33 The muscle was subjected to single pulses of 0.2 ms in duration at 30 V whereas the optimum length (Lo) for development of maximum isometric twitch force was determined. Fiber length (Lf) was determined by multiplying the figure obtained for Lo by the predetermined fiber length to muscle length ratio of 0.45.34 The maximum isometric force (Po) was calculated from the peak of the curve, as was data required to calculate time to half-peak and time to half-relaxation. Eccentric contractions were performed during a 0.75 seconds protocol.32 All data was digitized and analyzed using the DMA software (version 3.2; Aurora Scientific, Bristol, UK).
Clinical biochemistry. Serum and plasma were taken from the mouse jugular vein immediately after the killing with CO2 inhalation. Analysis of serum CK, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, urea and creatinine levels was performed by the clinical pathology laboratory (Mary Lyon Centre, Medical Research Council, Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK).
Statistical analysis. All data are reported as mean values ± SEM. Statistical differences between treatment groups and control groups were evaluated by SigmaStat (Systat Software, London, UK) and the Student's t-test was applied.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Figure S1. Phenotypic and functional improvement in mdx mice treated with 6 biweekly 3 mg/kg B-MSP-PMO conjugate. (a) Measurement of serum creatine kinase (CK) levels as an index of ongoing muscle membrane instability in treated mdx mice compared with untreated mdx control mice. Data shows a marginal fall in the serum CK levels in mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO compared with untreated age-matched mdx controls. (b) Measurement of serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) enzymes in treated mdx mice compared with untreated mdx mice. Data shows pathological parameters in B-MSP-PMO treated mdx mice compared with untreated controls with lower serum levels of both enzymes. (c) Muscle function was assessed using a functional grip strength test to determine the physical improvement of B-MSP-PMO treated mdx mice compared with untreated controls showing significant force recovery (t-test, *P < 0.05; 6 mice each group). Figure S2. Physiological improvement in mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO conjugate at 6 biweekly 6 mg/kg repeated doses. Functional measurement of isolated extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles from B-MSP-PMO treated mdx mice. (a) Quantification of the force drop in isolated EDL muscles treated with 6 bi-weekly injections of B-MSP-PMO at 6 mg/kg dose. Data shows significant resistance to force drop in treated EDL muscle compared with untreated controls. (b) Measurement of maximum isometric force in isolated EDL muscle from treated mdx mice. Results show significant increase of maximum isometric force in mdx mice treated with 6 bi-weekly 6 mg/kg B-MSP-PMO conjugate compared with untreated mdx controls (t-test, *P < 0.05; 6 mice each group). Figure S3. Body-weight measurements of mdx mice treated with 6 biweekly B-MSP-PMO at 3 and 6 mg/kg doses over 12 weeks. Data shows a steady body-weight increase and the same pattern of weight gain at both treatment doses as untreated mdx and normal C57BL6 controls. (6 mice each group). Figure S4. Investigation of other parameters in mdx mice treated with B-MSP-PMO conjugate at 6 biweekly 6 mg/kg repeated doses. Measurement of other inflammatory infiltrating cells and regeneration condition in muscles from B-MSP-PMO treated mdx mice. (a) Detection of macrophage and neutrophils in TA muscles treated with 6 bi-weekly injections of B-MSP-PMO at 6 mg/kg dose. Data shows fewer macrophage and neutrophil in treated TA muscle compared with untreated controls (scale bar=200μm). (b) Measurement of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the diaphragms of treated and untreated mdx mice (scale bar = 100μm). Data shows only sporadic CD8+ T lymphocytes were detected in the diaphragms treated with B-MSP-PMO at 6 bi-weekly 6 mg/kg repeated doses. (c) Identification of regenerating fibres in muscles from mdx mice treated with 6 bi-weekly injections of B-MSP-PMO at 6 mg/kg dose. The immunohistochemical staining shows the absence or low number of regenerating fibres in treated samples with B-MSP-PMO (scale bar= 200 μm). Arrows indicated the regenerating fibres detected by early fetal myosin isoform antibody. (d) Immunohistochemical staining of collagen IV shows the presence of collagen in diaphragm muscles from control and treated samples (scale bar= 100μm). (e) Quantification of collagen deposition in diaphragm muscles measured by Image J software and the data shows significantly decreases amount of collagen in muscles treated with B-MSP-PMO at 6 bi-weekly 6 mg/kg dosing regimen compared with untreated control mice (*P < 0.05, n=6).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by research grants from the UK Department of Health and the UK Muscular Dystrophy Campaign to M.J.A.W. The authors acknowledge the UK MDEX Consortium for helpful discussions; Professor Kay Davies (Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK) for providing access to facilities including the mdx mouse colony; Dave Powell (Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford) for assistance with physiological assays; Dr Hough (Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Mary Lyon Centre, MRC, Harwell, UK) for assistance with the clinical biochemistry assays; Christine Simpson (Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford) for assistance with histology; and Jed Hissinger (AVI Biopharma Inc., Corvallis, Oregon) for the synthesis of MSP-PMO conjugates. The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
REFERENCES
- Wood MJ, Gait MJ., and, Yin H. RNA-targeted splice-correction therapy for neuromuscular disease. Brain. 2010;133 Pt 4:957–972. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aartsma-Rus A, Janson AA, Kaman WE, Bremmer-Bout M, den Dunnen JT, Baas F, et al. Therapeutic antisense-induced exon skipping in cultured muscle cells from six different DMD patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:907–914. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aartsma-Rus A, Janson AA, Kaman WE, Bremmer-Bout M, van Ommen GJ, den Dunnen JT, et al. Antisense-induced multiexon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy makes more sense. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:83–92. doi: 10.1086/381039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aartsma-Rus A, Kaman WE, Weij R, den Dunnen JT, van Ommen GJ., and, van Deutekom JC. Exploring the frontiers of therapeutic exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy by double targeting within one or multiple exons. Mol Ther. 2006;14:401–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alter J, Lou F, Rabinowitz A, Yin H, Rosenfeld J, Wilton SD, et al. Systemic delivery of morpholino oligonucleotide restores dystrophin expression bodywide and improves dystrophic pathology. Nat Med. 2006;12:175–177. doi: 10.1038/nm1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gebski BL, Mann CJ, Fletcher S., and, Wilton SD. Morpholino antisense oligonucleotide induced dystrophin exon 23 skipping in mdx mouse muscle. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1801–1811. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu QL, Mann CJ, Lou F, Bou-Gharios G, Morris GE, Xue SA, et al. Functional amounts of dystrophin produced by skipping the mutated exon in the mdx dystrophic mouse. Nat Med. 2003;9:1009–1014. doi: 10.1038/nm897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mann CJ, Honeyman K, Cheng AJ, Ly T, Lloyd F, Fletcher S, et al. Antisense-induced exon skipping and synthesis of dystrophin in the mdx mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:42–47. doi: 10.1073/pnas.011408598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Deutekom JC, Janson AA, Ginjaar IB, Frankhuizen WS, Aartsma-Rus A, Bremmer-Bout M, et al. Local dystrophin restoration with antisense oligonucleotide PRO051. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2677–2686. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilton SD, Fall AM, Harding PL, McClorey G, Coleman C., and, Fletcher S. Antisense oligonucleotide-induced exon skipping across the human dystrophin gene transcript. Mol Ther. 2007;15:1288–1296. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin H, Lu Q., and, Wood M. Effective exon skipping and restoration of dystrophin expression by peptide nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides in mdx mice. Mol Ther. 2008;16:38–45. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin H, Moulton HM, Seow Y, Boyd C, Boutilier J, Iverson P, et al. Cell-penetrating peptide-conjugated antisense oligonucleotides restore systemic muscle and cardiac dystrophin expression and function. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:3909–3918. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heemskerk HA, de Winter CL, de Kimpe SJ, van Kuik-Romeijn P, Heuvelmans N, Platenburg GJ, et al. In vivo comparison of 2'-O-methyl phosphorothioate and morpholino antisense oligonucleotides for Duchenne muscular dystrophy exon skipping. J Gene Med. 2009;11:257–266. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- England SB, Nicholson LV, Johnson MA, Forrest SM, Love DR, Zubrzycka-Gaarn EE, et al. Very mild muscular dystrophy associated with the deletion of 46% of dystrophin. Nature. 1990;343:180–182. doi: 10.1038/343180a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregorevic P, Blankinship MJ., and, Chamberlain JS. Viral vectors for gene transfer to striated muscle. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2004;6:491–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinali M, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Feng L, Cirak S, Hunt D, Adkin C, et al. Local restoration of dystrophin expression with the morpholino oligomer AVI-4658 in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:918–928. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70211-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heemskerk H, de Winter C, van Kuik P, Heuvelmans N, Sabatelli P, Rimessi P, et al. Preclinical PK and PD studies on 2'-O-methyl-phosphorothioate RNA antisense oligonucleotides in the mdx mouse model. Mol Ther. 2010;18:1210–1217. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jearawiriyapaisarn N, Moulton HM, Buckley B, Roberts J, Sazani P, Fucharoen S, et al. Sustained dystrophin expression induced by peptide-conjugated morpholino oligomers in the muscles of mdx mice. Mol Ther. 2008;16:1624–1629. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu B, Li Y, Morcos PA, Doran TJ, Lu P., and, Lu QL. Octa-guanidine morpholino restores dystrophin expression in cardiac and skeletal muscles and ameliorates pathology in dystrophic mdx mice. Mol Ther. 2009;17:864–871. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu B, Moulton HM, Iversen PL, Jiang J, Li J, Li J, et al. Effective rescue of dystrophin improves cardiac function in dystrophin-deficient mice by a modified morpholino oligomer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:14814–14819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805676105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin H, Moulton HM, Betts C, Seow Y, Boutilier J, Iverson PL, et al. A fusion peptide directs enhanced systemic dystrophin exon skipping and functional restoration in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:4405–4414. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samoylova TI., and, Smith BF. Elucidation of muscle-binding peptides by phage display screening. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:460–466. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199904)22:4<460::aid-mus6>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher S, Honeyman K, Fall AM, Harding PL, Johnsen RD, Steinhaus JP, et al. Morpholino oligomer-mediated exon skipping averts the onset of dystrophic pathology in the mdx mouse. Mol Ther. 2007;15:1587–1592. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad A, Brinson M, Hodges BL, Chamberlain JS., and, Amalfitano A. Mdx mice inducibly expressing dystrophin provide insights into the potential of gene therapy for duchenne muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2507–2515. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.17.2507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fowler SC, Zarcone TJ, Chen R, Taylor MD., and, Wright DE. Low grip strength, impaired tongue force and hyperactivity induced by overexpression of neurotrophin-3 in mouse skeletal muscle. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2002;20:303–308. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(02)00010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiao C, Li J, Jiang J, Zhu X, Wang B, Li J, et al. Myostatin propeptide gene delivery by adeno-associated virus serotype 8 vectors enhances muscle growth and ameliorates dystrophic phenotypes in mdx mice. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19:241–254. doi: 10.1089/hum.2007.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glesby MJ, Rosenmann E, Nylen EG., and, Wrogemann K. Serum CK, calcium, magnesium, and oxidative phosphorylation in mdx mouse muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 1988;11:852–856. doi: 10.1002/mus.880110809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells DJ, Wells KE, Walsh FS, Davies KE, Goldspink G, Love DR, et al. Human dystrophin expression corrects the myopathic phenotype in transgenic mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1:35–40. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blake DJ, Weir A, Newey SE., and, Davies KE. Function and genetics of dystrophin and dystrophin-related proteins in muscle. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:291–329. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moulton HM, Fletcher S, Neuman BW, McClorey G, Stein DA, Abes S, et al. Cell-penetrating peptide-morpholino conjugates alter pre-mRNA splicing of DMD (Duchenne muscular dystrophy) and inhibit murine coronavirus replication in vivo. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35 Pt 4:826–828. doi: 10.1042/BST0350826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomonari K. A rat antibody against a structure functionally related to the mouse T-cell receptor/T3 complex. Immunogenetics. 1988;28:455–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00355379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barclay CJ, Woledge RC., and, Curtin NA. Effects of UCP3 genotype, temperature and muscle type on energy turnover of resting mouse skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch. 2009;457:857–864. doi: 10.1007/s00424-008-0552-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch GS, Hinkle RT., and, Faulkner JA. Power output of fast and slow skeletal muscles of mdx (dystrophic) and control mice after clenbuterol treatment. Exp Physiol. 2000;85:295–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks SV., and, Faulkner JA. Contractile properties of skeletal muscles from young, adult and aged mice. J Physiol (Lond) 1988;404:71–82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.