Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2010 Aug 18;48(10):3822–3823. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00941-10

CTX-M1 ESBL-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae Isolated from Cases of Bovine Mastitis

Clara Locatelli 1,2,*, Licia Scaccabarozzi 1,2, Giuliano Pisoni 1,2, Paolo Moroni 1,2
PMCID: PMC2953115  PMID: 20720020

Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., followed by Serratia spp. and Enterobacter spp., are the most frequent Gram-negative pathogens isolated from bovine clinical mastitis (8). The incidence of mastitis due to such bacteria has increased in recent years (7). Klebsiella is usually referred as particularly aggressive and prone to cause severe clinical mastitis, which responds poorly to treatment and is likely to have a fatal outcome (6, 13). Klebsiellae are defined as germs that easily produce enzymes like extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), thanks to their ability to survive longer than other Gram-negative rods in the environment and on the skin and, in particular, to allow ESBL genes to evolve (9). At the onset of clinical mastitis, it is impossible to identify the causative agent; thus, it is necessary to use broad-spectrum intramammary preparations which contain narrow- to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, alone or in combination with other antibiotics (1). The broad-spectrum cephalosporin ceftiofur is used as well in supportive systemic therapy (6).

Few recent works have studied Klebsiella isolation and ESBL detection in veterinary medicine (2, 16), and no data are available describing ESBL-mediated resistance in Klebsiella spp. isolated from bovine mastitis.

In this research, the antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL production were evaluated in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from animals with bovine clinical mastitis and selected for their resistance to ceftiofur, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin. Susceptibility to a range of antimicrobials, including those approved for both human and animal use (Table 1), was determined by disk diffusion assay according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretative criteria (3). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were used as quality control standards.

TABLE 1.

Comparison of resistance profiles of the nine isolates

Isolate Resistance profilea Presence ofb:
blaSHV blaTEM blaCTX-M
89 AMC CNM HAP NPZ RAX CFZ FOX STR +
169 AMC CEQ CNM HAP CFT DFX NPZ RAX CFZ FOX TET +
179 AMC CEQ CNM HAP CFT DFX NPZ RAX CFZ FOX TET STR SXT +
88 NPZ RAX STR KAN +
119 HAP CFT DFX RAX FOX TET +
187 CFT NPZ RAX STR KAN +
204 CEQ CFP CNM HAP CFT NPZ RAX CFZ FOX FEP TET STR + +
205 CEQ CFP CNM HAP CFT NPZ RAX CFZ CTX CRO TET STR ATM + + +
251 CNM HAP CFT DFX NPZ RAX FOX FEP TET + +
a

AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanate; CFT, ceftiofur; CFP, cefoperazone; HAP, cephapirin; CEQ, cefquinome; CNM, cefalonium; PH, penethamate hydriodide; MAR, marbofloxacin; DFX, danofloxacin; NPZ, benzylpenicillin-nafcillin-dihydrostreptomycin; RAX, rifaximin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CTX, cefotaxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; FOX, cefoxitin; CFZ, cefazolin; FEP, cefepime; IPM, imipenem; ATM, aztreonam; CIP, ciprofloxacin; STR, streptomycin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; TOB, tobramycin; TET, tetracycline; STX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

b

+, present; −, absent.

From March 2008 to March 2009, 140 klebsiellae were isolated from milk samples, representing 26.6% of the total number of Gram-negative isolates obtained from bovine clinical mastitis. The isolates were subcultured on MacConkey agar supplemented with 8 μg/ml of ceftiofur (5). Nine isolates, identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae, were able to grow in the presence of 8 μg of ceftiofur. All Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were screened against the panel in Table 1 by the disk diffusion method and for ESBLs by the double-disk diffusion assay. A strain was considered an ESBL producer when it showed the expansion of an inhibition zone between a disk containing amoxicillin-clavulanate (20 and 10 μg) and disks containing, respectively, ceftazidime (30 μg) and cefotaxime (30 μg) placed 25 mm apart (10). All Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were tested by PCR targeting the Ambler class A β-lactamase genes blaSHV, blaTEM, and blaCTX, identified in Klebsiella pneumoniae animal isolates (16), using previously published primer sets (14, 15). Sequencing of amplified genes completed the study.

The complete resistance profiles and the PCR results are summarized in Table 1. Only isolate 205, identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae, had a positive result to the double-disk test and was resistant to all the β-lactams, including cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, and sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanate. The amplification of a CTX-M class enzyme-encoding gene confirmed such a phenotype, and sequencing of the gene identified the blaCTX-M1 group. To our knowledge, it is the first report about a CTX-M1 enzyme produced by a Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae isolate in a case of bovine clinical mastitis. Isolate 205 also displayed a positive PCR result for genes blaSHV and blaTEM, and so did isolates 204 and 251. A previous randomized search detected only ESBL-producing E. coli and no Klebsiella spp. (11).

The generally low level of in vitro resistance and the low prevalence of ESBL-producing strains (0.7%) should guarantee a good outcome of drug treatment for Klebsiella involved in mastitis, but antimicrobial resistance is not the only factor affecting therapy efficacy (1, 4). However, the described isolation must encourage that attention be paid to a phenomenon which could evolve and be enforced under the pressure of antimicrobial therapy, as the use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins in veterinary medicine may select ESBL producers (12). It is recommended to screen klebsiellae from cases of bovine mastitis in order to keep the prevalence of ESBL producers under control.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The sequence of the CTX-M class enzyme-encoding gene identified in our study was added to GenBank (accession number HM921043).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 18 August 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bradley, A. J., and M. J. Green. 2009. Factors affecting cure when treating bovine clinical mastitis with cephalosporin-based intramammary preparations. J. Dairy Sci. 92:1941-1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brisse, S., and E. van Duijkeren. 2005. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of 100 Klebsiella animal clinical isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 105:307-312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2007. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; seventeenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 4.Constable, P. D., and D. E. Morin. 2003. Treatment of clinical mastitis using antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for treatment decisions. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. 19:139-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Donaldson, S. C., B. A. Straley, N. V. Hedge, A. A. Sawant, C. Debroy, and B. M. Jayarao. 2006. Molecular epidemiology of ceftiofur-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from dairy calves. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:3940-3948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Erskine, R. J., P. C. Bartlett, J. L. VanLente, and C. R. Phipps. 2002. Efficacy of systemic ceftiofur as a therapy for severe clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2571-2575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hillerton, J. E., and E. A. Berry. 2005. Treating mastitis in the cow—a tradition or an archaism. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98:1250-1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hogan, J., and K. L. Smith. 2003. Coliform mastitis. Vet. Res. 34:507-519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Livermore, D. M. 1995. β-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:557-584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Livermore, D. M., and D. F. Brown. 2001. Detection of β-lactamase-mediated resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48(Suppl. 1):59-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Locatelli, C., I. Caronte, L. Scaccabarozzi, R. Migliavacca, L. Pagani, and P. Moroni. 2009. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in E. coli strains isolated from clinical bovine mastitis. Vet. Res. Commun. 33(Suppl. 1):S141-S144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Madec, J.-Y., C. Lazizzera, P. Châtre, D. Meunier, S. Martin, G. Lepage, M.-F. Ménard, P. Lebreton, and T. Raumbaud. 2008. Prevalence of fecal carriage of acquired expanded-spectrum cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae strains from cattle in France. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1566-1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munoz, M. A., F. L. Welcome, Y. H. Schukken, and R. N. Zadoks. 2007. Molecular epidemiology of two Klebsiella pneumoniae mastitis outbreak on a dairy farm in New York State. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:3964-3971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pagani, L., R. Migliavacca, L. Pallecchi, C. Matti, E. Giacobone, G. Amicosante, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2002. Emerging extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Proteus mirabilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1549-1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pagani, L., E. Dell'Amico, R. Migliavacca, M. M. D'Andrea, E. Giacobone, G. Amicosante, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2003. Multiple CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in nosocomial isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from a hospital in northern Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4264-4269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vo An, T. T., E. van Duijkeren, A. C. Fluit, and W. Gaastra. 2007. Characteristics of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from horses. Vet. Microbiol. 124:248-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES