Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2010 Aug 27;192(21):5637–5644. doi: 10.1128/JB.00752-10

Radiation Desiccation Response Motif-Like Sequences Are Involved in Transcriptional Activation of the Deinococcal ssb Gene by Ionizing Radiation but Not by Desiccation

Aman Kumar Ujaoney 1,#, Akhilesh A Potnis 1,#, Pratiksha Kane 1, Rita Mukhopadhyaya 1, Shree Kumar Apte 1,*
PMCID: PMC2953676  PMID: 20802034

Abstract

Single-stranded-DNA binding protein (SSB) levels during poststress recovery of Deinococcus radiodurans were significantly enhanced by 60Co gamma rays or mitomycin C treatment but not by exposure to UV rays, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or desiccation. Addition of rifampin prior to postirradiation recovery blocked such induction. In silico analysis of the ssb promoter region revealed a 17-bp palindromic radiation/desiccation response motif (RDRM1) at bp −114 to −98 and a somewhat similar sequence (RDRM2) at bp −213 to −197, upstream of the ssb open reading frame. Involvement of these cis elements in radiation-responsive ssb gene expression was assessed by constructing transcriptional fusions of edited versions of the ssb promoter region with a nonspecific acid phosphatase encoding reporter gene, phoN. Recombinant D. radiodurans strains carrying such constructs clearly revealed (i) transcriptional induction of the ssb promoter upon irradiation and mitomycin C treatment but not upon UV or H2O2 treatment and (ii) involvement of both RDRM-like sequences in such activation of SSB expression, in an additive manner.


Tolerance to high doses of ionizing radiation (X rays and gamma rays), which cause extensive and lethal DNA damage, is rare among life forms. However, species of the Gram-positive, pink-orange aerobic bacterium Deinococcus have been known to survive exposure to extremely high doses of ionizing radiation, UV rays, mitomycin C, desiccation, and other DNA-damaging agents (4, 30). Members of the family Deinococcaceae, comprising over 30 species, inhabit diverse environments and survive 5 kGy of 60Co gamma rays without any loss of viability (31). Some of the strains are known to survive doses as high as even 15 kGy or more (13). The phenomena underlying such extremophilic behavior of deinococci, though not entirely clear, fall into three major categories. These are (i) a unique condensed organization of the genome, which minimizes DNA damage and facilitates rapid postirradiation repair (9, 11, 23, 43); (ii) highly proficient, regular, and novel DNA repair mechanisms (6, 8) aided by proteins unique to deinococci (6, 38); and (iii) very capable enzymatic/nonenzymatic cleaning systems to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protect proteins from oxidative damage (9, 10) or to degrade and resynthesize damaged proteins (22) in order to quickly alleviate the radiation toxicity and restore cellular homeostasis. Consequently, the conventional enzymes responsible for postirradiation recovery (PIR) survive and function with far better efficiency in deinococci (26). New mechanisms continue to be elaborated (20, 22, 42).

Genomes of at least three highly radioresistant Deinococcus spp. have already been completely sequenced (14, 26, 39). These species are (i) D. radiodurans, the species of the first prototype strain isolated from irradiated meat cans 50 years ago and the most studied so far (1); (ii) the moderately thermophilic D. geothermalis, isolated from a hot spring in Italy (17); and (iii) the most recent, D. deserti, obtained from surface sands of the Sahara desert (13). In silico analyses of the genomes of these species have defined a minimal set of genes required for extreme radiation/desiccation resistance (RDR) in the genus Deinococcus (14, 26). Comparative genomics supplemented by microarray and proteomic analyses have revealed enhanced expression of several genes in Deinococcus spp. immediately following irradiation (24, 25, 38). As expected, this set is dominated by genes related to DNA end protection, replication, recombination, and repair, but it also includes genes encoding chaperones, proteases, RNA binding proteins, RNA ligases, transcription factors, membrane transporters, Krebs cycle enzymes, transposases, superoxide dismutases/thioredoxin/peroxidases, and even tellurium resistance and plant LEA-like proteins (5, 10, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 32, 38).

Mechanisms which facilitate radiation-induced gene expression have been investigated for a very few selected genes (such as recA) in deinococci and remain poorly understood. D. radiodurans recA expression is induced by the PprI protein, which, however, does not bind the recA promoter (15, 18, 21). LexA, the well-known repressor of recA expression in most bacteria, is not induced upon irradiation in D. radiodurans and does not regulate postirradiation recA induction (33). In most cases, the radiation-enhanced gene expression appears to be due to transcriptional activation (24, 25), but the corresponding regulatory cis elements and trans-acting proteins have remained largely unexplored so far. Critical examination of deinococcal genomes recently identified a 17-bp palindromic sequence (T, T, A/C, T/C, G, T/C, N, N, T/A, N, A, A/G, C, G/A, T/G, A, A) upstream of several radiation-induced genes in all three Deinococcus spp. (14, 26). The most conserved nucleotides are shown in bold, while the center of dyad symmetry lies around the ninth nucleotide, which is T/A. The sequence, first described by Makarova et al. as a radiation/desiccation response motif (RDRM), was found upstream of 29 genes in D. radiodurans and 25 genes in D. geothermalis (26). Subsequently, the motif has also been reported upstream of 25 genes in D. deserti by de Groot et al., (14), who have preferred to describe it as radiation response motif (RRM). The radiation and desiccation resistance (RDR) regulon common to all three Deinococcus spp. thus includes about 25 genes, all of which possess RDRM sequences upstream of their open reading frames (ORFs). Prominent genes/operons in this set include several DNA replication/recombination/repair-related genes, such as ssb, gyrA and gyrB, cinA/ligT/recA, uvrA, uvrB and uvrD, mutS, recQ, ruvB, pprA, ddrA, ddrB, ddrD, and others (6, 14, 26). In D. radiodurans and in D. deserti, for which transcriptome data are available, all the genes of the RDR are also upregulated during postirradiation recovery (14). Strangely, however, the involvement of RDRM sequences per se in desiccation/radiation induction of deinococcal genes has never been verified experimentally.

The present study assessed the role of RDRM-like sequences in radiation-induced gene expression, taking the single-stranded-DNA binding protein (SSB)-encoding gene, ssb, as a test case. The ssb gene in D. radiodurans harbors two RDRM-like sequences, RDRM1 and RDRM2, located between bp −114 and −98 and bp −213 and −197, respectively (16, 39; http://cmr.jcvi.org/cgi-bin/CMR/GenomePage.cgi?org=gdr). Using truncated versions of the ssb promoter carrying none, one, or both of the RDRM-like sequences fused to the reporter gene phoN, we have demonstrated that both RDRM sequences are involved in radiation-induced ssb expression, in an additive way. Our data also show that desiccation or exposure to UV or hydrogen peroxide treatment does not influence ssb expression in D. radiodurans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth condition.

Deinococcus radiodurans strain R1 was maintained in TGY (1% tryptone, 0.1% glucose, 0.5% yeast extract) medium at 32°C under agitation at 150 rpm. Escherichia coli strain DH5α [F recA41 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 (rK mK+) supE44 relA lacU169] was maintained in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C under agitation at 150 rpm. Bacterial growth was measured spectrophotometrically as turbidity (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]). The antibiotics used for selection of recombinants were chloramphenicol (3 μg ml−1) for D. radiodurans and carbenicillin (100 μg ml−1) for E. coli DH5α.

PCR amplification, cloning, and transformation.

The pRN1 vector, generated previously in our laboratory, contains a promoterless phoN gene (Table 1) and was used for cloning of all the putative promoter fragments. Genomic DNA isolation from D. radiodurans and plasmid isolation from E. coli were carried out as described previously (28, 37). The primers used for PCR were designed based on the corrected published sequences of the ssb gene (16) and the Deinococcus genome (39; http://cmr.jcvi.org/cgi-bin/CMR/GenomePage.cgi?org=gdr). All PCR products were purified using a QiaexII gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For construction of plasmids pSN3 and pSN4, the 132-bp and 351-bp DNA sequences upstream of the ssb open reading frame (ORF) (see Fig. 3b and c) were PCR amplified using primers shown in Table 1. The PCR products were gel purified, restriction digested with XbaI-NdeI, and ligated at same sites in pRN1. Plasmid pSN2 was generated in two steps. First, 102 bp of DNA upstream of the ssb ORF was PCR amplified using primers P3 and P4 and ligated in the pTZ57R/T PCR product cloning vector (Table 1), yielding pTAPssb102. Next, plasmid pTAPssb102 was restriction digested with SmaI-NdeI to release the 112-bp insert, which was gel purified and ligated to pRN1 at NruI-NdeI sites to obtain pSN2. All the plasmid constructs were transformed in E. coli DH5α cells and screened on plates containing carbenicillin (100 μg ml−1). Plasmids isolated from E. coli DH5α were used to transform D. radiodurans cells as described earlier (28). All recombinant clones were also screened by colony PCR and confirmed by sequencing using primers P5 and P6 (Table 1). Deinococcal transformants expressing the phoN reporter gene were screened on histochemical plates (2, 36) containing phenolphthalein diphosphate (PDP) (1 mg ml−1), methyl green (MG) (10 μg ml−1), and chloramphenicol (Cm) (3 μg ml−1). The PhoN-positive colonies exhibited a green color.

TABLE 1.

Plasmids and primers used in the study

Plasmid or primer Descriptiona Reference, source, or comment
Plasmids
    pRAD1 E. coli-D. radiodurans shuttle vector (copy no., 7-10 per cell in D. radiodurans) 28
    pRN1 pRAD1 with phoN cloned at NdeI and BamHI sites; Cbr Cmr Lab collection
    pTZ57R/T PCR product cloning vector (2,886 bp, Apr) for blue-white selection of transformants MBI Fermentas
    pTAPssb102 102-bp sequence upstream of D. radiodurans ssb cloned in pTZ57R/T This study
    pSN2 pRN1 with 112-bp fragment from pTAPssb102 subcloned at NruI and NdeI sites This study
    pSN3 pRN1 with 132-bp sequence upstream of D. radiodurans ssb ORF cloned at XbaI and NdeI sites This study
    pSN4 pRN1 with 351-bp sequence upstream of D. radiodurans ssb ORF cloned at XbaI and NdeI sites This study
Primers
    P1 5′-CCGAGAAGGATTACAATCTAGAACG-3′ XbaI
    P2 5′-CGGAGTGGAAGATCTAGAAGGCCTG-3′ XbaI
    P3 5′-GCGAGCTCATAATTGACTCTGCTTGTTACTATCTAGTG-3′ SacI
    P4 5′-CATGCCTCGGGCCATATGAAATTCT-3′ NdeI
    P5 5′-GGAGCGGATAACAATTTCACACA-3′ P5 and P6 flank multiple-cloning site, 58 bp on either side in pRad1
    P6 5′-AACGCGGCTGCAAGAATGGTA-3′
a

The underlined sequence corresponds to the restriction site incorporated in the primer.

Treatment with various stresses.

Wild-type and recombinant D. radiodurans cells (carrying plasmid pSN2, pSN3, pSN4, or pRN1) were grown overnight at 32°C to an OD600 of 4 to 5/ml and subjected to one of the following stress treatments: (i) 2 to 8 kGy of gamma radiation from a 60Co source (GC220; Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Canada) (0.36 kGy h−1), (ii) 20 μg ml−1 of mitomycin C (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 15 min at 32°C, (iii) 50 or 100 mM hydrogen peroxide (Ranchem, New Delhi, India) for 1 h at 32°C, or (iv) 2.5 or 5 kJ m−2 of UV (Philips) (5 J m−2 s−1). UV stress was applied to 4 ml of culture spread in a 9-cm sterile petri plate to form a <1-mm layer and to minimize absorption by the TGY medium. For desiccation stress, D. radiodurans cells grown overnight were filtered and subjected to 1, 2, or 6 weeks of desiccation using fused calcium chloride in desiccators stored at 23°C. Following stress treatments, cells were washed three times with fresh TGY medium, inoculated in TGY at a final OD600 of 0.5, and allowed to recover. Periodically, samples were removed for various analyses and either used directly for biochemical assays or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C for Western blots or zymograms.

Western blotting and immunodetection of SSB.

For assessment of transcriptional activation of ssb expression, wild-type D. radiodurans cells grown overnight (OD600 = 5 ml−1) were divided into two sets. To one set, rifampin (50 μg ml−1) was added prior to gamma radiation of 7 kGy and washed off before PIR; to the second set, rifampin was added after irradiation but before PIR of cells. An additional treatment had TGY medium with rifampin (50 μg ml−1) which was irradiated separately and added during PIR of irradiated cells. All treatments had their corresponding unirradiated controls.

For quantitation of SSB levels, proteins were extracted from wild-type D. radiodurans after 3 h of poststress recovery. Protein extracts (30 to 100 μg) from control or stressed samples were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted on a nitrocellulose membrane. The primary antibody used was anti-D. radiodurans SSB antibody at a 1:200 dilution and incubated overnight, while the secondary antibody used was anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) coupled to alkaline phosphatase at a 1:10,000 dilution and incubated for 1.5 to 2 h. The blot was developed using the substrate nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (BCIP) (Roche Biochemicals, Germany).

Assays for reporter gene activity.

phoN was used as a reporter gene for the first time in this study. PhoN is a periplasmic nonspecific acid phosphatase that cleaves organic phosphate to release phosphoric acid, optimally at pH 5 to 7 (7). PhoN activity expressed from the Pssb promoter was monitored in the following two ways: (i) by zymogram analyses of stressed cells after 3 h of PIR, as described earlier (2, 36), with activity staining of PhoN protein on zymograms carried out using NBT-BCIP and (ii) by spectrophotometric analysis of cell-bound PhoN activity as p-nitrophenol (pNP) released from p-nitrophenylphosphate (pNPP) (Sisco Research Laboratories, Mumbai, India) at 405 nm. Acid phosphatase enzyme activity of cells is reported as nmol of pNP liberated min−1 OD600 unit−1 (7).

RESULTS

Effects of DNA-damaging agents on deinococcal ssb expression.

D. radiodurans cells exposed to gamma rays (7 kGy) or mitomycin C (20 μg ml−1 for 15 min) showed significant induction of immunodetectable SSB levels on Western blots during poststress recovery (Fig. 1 a and 1b). The increase in SSB levels displayed a time dependence, with maximum enhancement observed at 3 h of poststress recovery following exposure to both stressors (Fig. 1a and b). Exposure to high doses of UV rays (2.5 to 5 kJ m−2) or hydrogen peroxide (50 to 100 mM) did not influence cellular SSB levels in D. radiodurans (Fig. 1c and d). Prolonged desiccation of 1 to 6 weeks also did not affect SSB levels (Fig. 1e).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Effect of DNA-damaging agents on deinococcal SSB levels. Stationary-phase deinococcal cells were exposed to the specified dose or concentration of either gamma rays (a), mitomycin C for 15 min (b), UV rays (c), or H2O2 for 1 h (d) or were dehydrated in a desiccator using fused calcium chloride as desiccant for the specified duration (e). After the stress, cells were allowed to recover in TGY medium, and proteins were extracted at the specified time points during poststress recovery. Equal amounts of proteins (30 μg) were electrophoretically resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted on nitrocellulose membrane. SSB levels in stressed (+) and unstressed (−) samples were immunodetected using anti-D. radiodurans SSB antibody and quantitated. The numbers below the lanes depict quantitation of SSB levels by densitometry.

Effect of gamma irradiation on ssb expression in D. radiodurans.

A distinct radiation dose-dependent increase in SSB levels, compared to those in the unirradiated controls, was observed during postirradiation recovery in D. radiodurans, resulting in 6.01-fold-higher SSB levels at a 7-kGy dose after 3 h of postirradiation recovery (PIR) (Fig. 2 a). The observed radiation-induced SSB enhancement at 7 kGy was abolished if rifampin was added during PIR (Fig. 2b, lanes 4 and 5) but was seen in cells irradiated in the presence of rifampin but recovered in the absence of transcriptional inhibitor (Fig. 2b, lane 3). Addition of irradiated rifampin during PIR also inhibited the radiation-induced SSB enhancement (Fig. 2b, lane 1), indicating that irradiation did not inactivate rifampin.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Effect of ionizing radiation on deinococcal SSB levels. (a) Stationary-phase D. radiodurans cells were exposed to specified dose of 60Co gamma rays. (b) Cells were irradiated (7 kGy) in the presence of 50 μg ml−1 of rifampin, which was either added during irradiation and washed off before recovery (lanes 2 and 3), added during PIR (lanes 4 and 5), or irradiated (7 kGy) (I) and added during PIR (lane 1), and compared with unirradiated control (C) cells. Posttreatment cells were allowed to recover in TGY medium for 3 h. Protein extracts (100-μg blot [a] or 30-μg blot ) were electrophoretically resolved. Other details were as described for Fig. 1.

Bioinformatic analysis of DNA sequence upstream of the deinococcal ssb gene.

The ssb gene in D. radiodurans is located 119 bp downstream of the annotated rpsF gene and is followed by the rpsR gene, located 56 bp downstream of ssb (Fig. 3 a). In silico analysis of the 351-bp region upstream of the ssb ORF using BPROM software (Softberry) predicted the putative −10 and −35 promoter-like sequences, while a manual sequence search revealed the Shine Dalgarno (SD) sequence upstream of the ssb ORF (Fig. 3b). A 17-bp predicted conserved radiation/desiccation response motif (5′-TTATGTCATTGACATAA-3′) was observed between bp −114 and −98 (RDRM1), and a not-as-conserved but similar motif (5′-AACCGCCATCGCCAGCA-3′) was observed between bp −213 and −197 (RDRM2) upstream of the start of the ssb ORF (Fig. 3b). This places RDRM1 in the intergenic region between the rpsF and ssb genes and RDRM2 within the rpsF gene, 74 bp upstream of the stop codon (Fig. 3b and c).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Organization of the ssb gene in D. radiodurans and various constructs. (a) Genomic location of the ssb gene in D. radiodurans. (b) Nucleotide sequence of the putative promoter region of ssb from the D. radiodurans genome, showing various cis elements. RDRM1 and RDRM2 sequences are shown in bold. A putative SD sequence, −10- and −35-like sequences, the rpsF stop codon, and the ssb start codon are italicized and labeled. Primer sequences are underlined. The first codon of the D. radiodurans ssb ORF is shown. (c) Schematic representation of various Pssb-phoN transcriptional fusions and the primers used.

Construction of Pssb-phoN transcriptional fusions.

In order to assess the possible role played by the two RDRM-like sequences in regulation of ssb expression, transcriptional fusions of RDRM carrying DNA sequences were constructed with the phoN gene (Fig. 3c), which encodes a nonspecific acid phosphatase. For this, we used an existing plasmid, pRN1 (Table 1). Specified lengths of ssb promoter regions were cloned in pRN1 (as described in Materials and Methods) to generate recombinant plasmids pSN2, pSN3, and pSN4 (Fig. 3c; Table 1). The plasmid pSN4 carried both RDRM1 and RDRM2, pSN3 carried only RDRM1, and pSN2 carried only the last 5 bases of the RDRM1 sequence (Fig. 3b and c).

Assessment of reporter (PhoN) activity expressed from the deinococcal ssb promoter.

Differences among various clones were visualized using activity staining on zymograms. In-gel enzyme activity of PhoN in clone pSN4 showed strong induction of the reporter gene after exposure of cells to gamma rays or mitomycin C but not upon exposure to UV or H2O2 stress (Fig. 4 a). The gamma ray/mitomycin C induction of various Pssb-phoN constructs was rigorously assessed further (Fig. 4b and c). For both the stresses, the highest in-gel enzyme activity was observed in clone pSN4, followed by clone pSN3, while only basal-level activity was seen in clone pSN2 (Fig. 4b and c). The relative induction of Pssb-driven PhoN expression in various clones was further confirmed and quantitated by spectrophotometric analysis of PhoN enzyme activity, using pNPP as the substrate (Fig. 5). The reporter gene activity (PhoN) in both clones pSN3 and pSN4 increased steadily with time. For both gamma rays and mitomycin C, clone pSN4 cells showed much higher activity (∼6- to 8-fold after 5 h) than pSN3 (∼4- to 5-fold after 5 h) when equivalent cells were tested (Fig. 5). Clone pSN2 showed only basal PhoN activity and did not respond to irradiation or mitomycin C treatment.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Zymogram analysis of PhoN reporter activity expressed from the deinococcal ssb promoter during poststress recovery. (a) The recombinant D. radiodurans strain carrying the construct pSN4 was exposed to different stresses and allowed to recover in fresh TGY medium for 3 h under the usual growth conditions. Proteins were extracted in nonreducing buffer and electrophoretically resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE. Activity bands were developed by incubating the gel with NBT-BCIP in acetate buffer. (b and c) Recombinant D. radiodurans strains carrying either pSN2, pSN3, or pSN4 were exposed to 7 kGy of 60Co gamma rays or 20 μg ml−1 of mitomycin C for 15 min. Other details were as described for panel a.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Biochemical assays of PhoN reporter activity expressed from the deinococcal ssb promoter during poststress recovery. Recombinant D. radiodurans strains carrying plasmid pSN2 (ΔRDRM1 and ΔRDRM2), pSN3 (ΔRDRM2), pSN4 (wild type), or pRN1 (vector control) were exposed to either 7 kGy of 60Co gamma rays (a) or 20 μg ml−1 mitomycin C for 15 min (b). After the stress, cells were washed and allowed to recover in TGY for 5 h. Aliquots of 100 μl were removed periodically for cell-based acid phosphatase assays using pNPP as the substrate. PhoN activity in untreated control (C), irradiated (I), or mitomycin C-treated (M) cells during recovery is shown.

DISCUSSION

The single-stranded-DNA binding protein (SSB), in conjunction with the RecA protein, is involved in all important DNA-related cellular activities, such as replication, transcription, recombination, and repair, in bacteria. Several earlier studies have shown that RecA is normally expressed at a low basal level in D. radiodurans but that its levels significantly increase during recovery from radiation stress (12, 25). The present data reveal that SSB levels in D. radiodurans follow a similar kinetics and are induced by irradiation in a time-dependent (Fig. 1a) and dose-dependent (Fig. 2a) manner. Such enhanced SSB levels during PIR are attained by transcriptional activation of the ssb gene. This is borne out by the facts that (i) addition of the bacterial transcription inhibitor rifampin before commencement of PIR blocks such enhancement, (ii) cells irradiated in the presence of rifampin but recovered after washing off of rifampin show enhanced SSB levels, and (iii) irradiation does not inactivate rifampin and addition of irradiated rifampin prior to PIR also prevents SSB upregulation during PIR (Fig. 2b).

The SSB levels in D. radiodurans are enhanced not only by a high dose (7 kGy) of gamma irradiation (Fig. 1a and 2a) but also by mitomycin C treatment (Fig. 1b), both of which result in abundant double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA or double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) adducts. UV exposure and H2O2 treatment, which do not produce detectable DSBs in D. radiodurans (27) but instead cause more pyrimidine dimers, individual base damage, or single-strand breaks, do not affect SSB expression (Fig. 1c and d). These results suggest that multiple DSBs in DNA may possibly act as the trigger for the observed response. However, prolonged desiccation, which is known to cause DNA double-strand breaks in D. radiodurans (27), does not enhance cellular SSB levels (Fig. 1e). This is surprising in view of the predicted commonality of response shared by D. radiodurans cells exposed to gamma rays or desiccation (27, 35). The underlying reasons are not clear, but a possible explanation may be that while prolonged desiccation, like radiation, does cause DSBs in DNA in D. radiodurans, the magnitudes of damage caused by the two stresses are very different. For example, 1 to 4 weeks of desiccation causes much less DNA damage (27) than 3 to 5 kGy of gamma irradiation (4, 27), and DNA DSBs comparable to those after a 5-kGy or higher dose of irradiation are seen only after 6 weeks of desiccation (27). It is possible, therefore, that a relatively high threshold level of DSBs is required for induction of ssb expression, as is also indicated by the data presented in Fig. 2a. Acute irradiation (>3 kGy) may easily exceed this threshold, while chronic slow-acting desiccation may not. An interesting related question is about how the DNA damage caused by desiccation is managed without SSB. D. radiodurans possesses another functional SSB-like protein, DdrB (34, 40). ddrB expression is enhanced in response to both irradiation and desiccation (38). This “alternate SSB” may effectively substitute for SSB function under desiccation.

The cis elements involved in the radiation/mitomycin-induced transcriptional activation of the D. radiodurans ssb gene have been elucidated. Both the RDRM1 and RDRM2 sequences appear to be important and to function in an additive manner in clone pSN4, since deletion of one (pSN3) or both (pSN2) elements progressively inhibits the Pssb promoter activity, as assessed in several different ways (Fig. 4 and 5). The two RDRM-like sequences of D. radiodurans have little in common; i.e., only eight bases, at the 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th, 13th, 14th, and 17th positions, are shared (Fig. 6). The ΔG values for RDRM1 and RDRM2 (predicted using BPROM software) at 32°C, the optimal growth temperature for D. radiodurans, and their GC contents are also very different. RDRM2 is very dissimilar from the predicted global RDRM (26). However, it has much higher GC content (64.7%) than RDRM1 (23.5%) and superior ΔG values (−32.4 kcal, versus −22.5 kcal for RDRM1), and it does function as a regulatory palindrome in D. radiodurans. Our data demonstrate that instead of simple sequence homology, the use of additional parameters such as ΔG values may aid in recognition of additional/similar regulatory palindromic sequences in bacterial genomes. Palindromes have been shown to act as cis elements upregulating transcription of certain eukaryotic genes (3). Recent reports based on comparative genomics have also identified certain palindromic sequences in prokaryotes which act as recognition sites for RNA polymerase or transcription factors and enhance transcription (41). More importantly, both RDRM1 and RDRM2 sequences are found at identical locations (based on ClustalW analysis [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html]), upstream of the ssb ORF in all three deinococcal species (D. radiodurans, D. geothermalis, and D. deserti) (Fig. 6), with comparable ΔG values of −22.5 to −27.6 kcal for RDRM1 and −28.3 to −32.5 kcal for RDRM2. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that these motifs indeed regulate radiation/mitomycin C-induced ssb gene expression in D. radiodurans. The regulatory mechanisms involving RDRM-like cis elements need to be explored further. Preliminary attempts in our laboratory failed to detect and isolate a trans-acting protein capable of binding the 351-bp-long ssb promoter DNA, carrying both RDRM like sequences.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Comparative bioinformatic analysis of the ssb promoter sequences of three Deinococcus spp. Nucleotide sequences of the ssb promoter regions of three Deinococcus species were aligned using ClustalW software. RDRM1 and RDRM2 sequences are shown in bold. The putative −10 and −35 sequences are underlined.

Comparative genomics had very accurately predicted the possible involvement of RDRM-like sequences in radiation/desiccation-responsive expression of several genes in the three deinococcal species studied so far (6, 14, 26), though such a role had never been experimentally verified. The present work has revealed the importance and involvement of RDRM-like sequences in radiation-induced ssb gene expression and its insensitivity to desiccation in D. radiodurans. In the future, if this feature is found to be common to other genes/operons which harbor upstream RDRM-like sequences, it may be more prudent to rename this regulatory element the radiation response motif (RRM), instead of using the name RDRM given earlier.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge K. W. Minton for providing Deinococcus radiodurans strain R1, M. E. Lidstrom for providing pRAD1, and Deepti Appukuttan for providing plasmid pRN1.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 27 August 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anderson, A. W., H. C. Nordan, R. F. Cain, G. Parrish, and D. Duggan. 1956. Studies on a radio-resistant micrococcus. I. Isolation, morphology, cultural characteristics, and resistance to gamma radiation. Food Technol. 10:575-578. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Appukuttan, D., A. S. Rao, and S. K. Apte. 2006. Engineering of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 for bioprecipitation of uranium from dilute nuclear waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:7873-7878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barron, E. A., Z. Cao, B. G. Schneider, E. Kraig, A. J. Carrillo, and Z. D. Sharp. 1989. Dual functions of a cis-acting element within the rat prolactin gene promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:817-819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Battista, J. R. 1997. Against all odds: the survival strategies of Deinococcus radiodurans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 51:203-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Battista, J. R., M. J. Park, and A. E. McLemore. 2001. Inactivation of two homologues of proteins presumed to be involved in the desiccation tolerance of plants sensitizes Deinococcus radiodurans R1 to desiccation. Cryobiology 43:133-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blasius, M., S. Sommer, and U. Hubscher. 2008. Deinococcus radiodurans: what belongs to the survival kit? Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43:221-238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bolton, P. G., and A. C. Dean. 1972. Phosphatase synthesis in Klebsiella (Aerobacter) aerogenes growing in continuous culture. Biochem. J. 127:87-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cox, M. M., and J. R. Battista. 2005. Deinococcus radiodurans—the consummate survivor. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3:882-892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Daly, M. J. 2006. Modulating radiation resistance: insights based on defenses against reactive oxygen species in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Clin. Lab. Med. 26:491-504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Daly, M. J., E. K. Gaidamakova, V. Y. Matrosova, A. Vasilenko, M. Zhai, R. D. Leapman, B. Lai, B. Ravel, S. M. Li, K. M. Kemner, and J. K. Fredrickson. 2007. Protein oxidation implicated as the primary determinant of bacterial radioresistance. PLoS Biol. 5:e92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daly, M. J., E. K. Gaidamakova, V. Y. Matrosova, A. Vasilenko, M. Zhai, A. Venkateswaran, M. Hess, M. V. Omelchenko, H. M. Kostandarithes, K. S. Makarova, L. P. Wackett, J. K. Fredrickson, and D. Ghosal. 2004. Accumulation of Mn(II) in Deinococcus radiodurans facilitates gamma-radiation resistance. Science 306:1025-1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daly, M. J., and K. W. Minton. 1996. An alternative pathway of recombination of chromosomal fragments precedes recA-dependent recombination in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Bacteriol. 178:4461-4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Groot, A., V. Chapon, P. Servant, R. Christen, M. F. Saux, S. Sommer, and T. Heulin. 2005. Deinococcus deserti sp. nov., a gamma-radiation-tolerant bacterium isolated from the Sahara Desert. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:2441-2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Groot, A., R. Dulermo, P. Ortet, L. Blanchard, P. Guerin, B. Fernandez, B. Vacherie, C. Dossat, E. Jolivet, P. Siguier, M. Chandler, M. Barakat, A. Dedieu, V. Barbe, T. Heulin, S. Sommer, W. Achouak, and J. Armengaud. 2009. Alliance of proteomics and genomics to unravel the specificities of Sahara bacterium Deinococcus deserti. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Earl, A. M., M. M. Mohundro, I. S. Mian, and J. R. Battista. 2002. The IrrE protein of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 is a novel regulator of recA expression. J. Bacteriol. 184:6216-6224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eggington, J. M., N. Haruta, E. A. Wood, and M. M. Cox. 2004. The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Deinococcus radiodurans. BMC Microbiol. 4:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ferreira, A. C., M. F. Nobre, F. A. Rainey, M. T. Silva, R. Wait, J. Burghardt, A. P. Chung, and M. S. da Costa. 1997. Deinococcus geothermalis sp. nov. and Deinococcus murrayi sp. nov., two extremely radiation-resistant and slightly thermophilic species from hot springs. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:939-947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gao, G., D. Le, L. Huang, H. Lu, I. Narumi, and Y. Hua. 2006. Internal promoter characterization and expression of the Deinococcus radiodurans pprI-folP gene cluster. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 257:195-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grimsley, J. K., C. I. Masters, E. P. Clark, and K. W. Minton. 1991. Analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA double-strand breakage and repair in Deinococcus radiodurans and a radiosensitive mutant. Int. J. Radiat Biol. 60:613-626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harris, D. R., M. Tanaka, S. V. Saveliev, E. Jolivet, A. M. Earl, M. M. Cox, and J. R. Battista. 2004. Preserving genome integrity: the DdrA protein of Deinococcus radiodurans R1. PLoS Biol. 2:e304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hua, Y., I. Narumi, G. Gao, B. Tian, K. Satoh, S. Kitayama, and B. Shen. 2003. PprI: a general switch responsible for extreme radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 306:354-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Joshi, B., R. Schmid, K. Altendorf, and S. K. Apte. 2004. Protein recycling is a major component of post-irradiation recovery in Deinococcus radiodurans strain R1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 320:1112-1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Levin-Zaidman, S., J. Englander, E. Shimoni, A. K. Sharma, K. W. Minton, and A. Minsky. 2003. Ringlike structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans genome: a key to radioresistance? Science 299:254-256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lipton, M. S., L. Pasa-Tolic, G. A. Anderson, D. J. Anderson, D. L. Auberry, J. R. Battista, M. J. Daly, J. Fredrickson, K. K. Hixson, H. Kostandarithes, C. Masselon, L. M. Markillie, R. J. Moore, M. F. Romine, Y. Shen, E. Stritmatter, N. Tolic, H. R. Udseth, A. Venkateswaran, K. K. Wong, R. Zhao, and R. D. Smith. 2002. Global analysis of the Deinococcus radiodurans proteome by using accurate mass tags. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:11049-11054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu, Y., J. Zhou, M. V. Omelchenko, A. S. Beliaev, A. Venkateswaran, J. Stair, L. Wu, D. K. Thompson, D. Xu, I. B. Rogozin, E. K. Gaidamakova, M. Zhai, K. S. Makarova, E. V. Koonin, and M. J. Daly. 2003. Transcriptome dynamics of Deinococcus radiodurans recovering from ionizing radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:4191-4196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Makarova, K. S., M. V. Omelchenko, E. K. Gaidamakova, V. Y. Matrosova, A. Vasilenko, M. Zhai, A. Lapidus, A. Copeland, E. Kim, M. Land, K. Mavrommatis, S. Pitluck, P. M. Richardson, C. Detter, T. Brettin, E. Saunders, B. Lai, B. Ravel, K. M. Kemner, Y. I. Wolf, A. Sorokin, A. V. Gerasimova, M. S. Gelfand, J. K. Fredrickson, E. V. Koonin, and M. J. Daly. 2007. Deinococcus geothermalis: the pool of extreme radiation resistance genes shrinks. PLoS One 2:e955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mattimore, V., and J. R. Battista. 1996. Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J. Bacteriol. 178:633-637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meima, R., and M. E. Lidstrom. 2000. Characterization of the minimal replicon of a cryptic Deinococcus radiodurans SARK plasmid and development of versatile Escherichia coli-D. radiodurans shuttle vectors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3856-3867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meima, R., H. M. Rothfuss, L. Gewin, and M. E. Lidstrom. 2001. Promoter cloning in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Bacteriol. 183:3169-3175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Minton, K. W. 1994. DNA repair in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Mol. Microbiol. 13:9-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moseley, B. E., and A. Mattingly. 1971. Repair of irradiation transforming deoxyribonucleic acid in wild type and a radiation-sensitive mutant of Micrococcus radiodurans. J. Bacteriol. 105:976-983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Narumi, I., K. Satoh, S. Cui, T. Funayama, S. Kitayama, and H. Watanabe. 2004. PprA: a novel protein from Deinococcus radiodurans that stimulates DNA ligation. Mol. Microbiol. 54:278-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Narumi, I., K. Satoh, M. Kikuchi, T. Funayama, T. Yanagisawa, Y. Kobayashi, H. Watanabe, and K. Yamamoto. 2001. The LexA protein from Deinococcus radiodurans is not involved in RecA induction following gamma irradiation. J. Bacteriol. 183:6951-6956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Norais, C. A., S. Chitteni-Pattu, E. A. Wood, R. B. Inman, and M. M. Cox. 2009. DdrB protein, an alternative Deinococcus radiodurans SSB induced by ionizing radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 284:21402-21411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rainey, F. A., M. Ferreira, M. F. Nobre, K. Ray, D. Bagaley, A. M. Earl, J. R. Battista, B. Gomez-Silva, C. P. McKay, and M. S. da Costa. 2007. Deinococcus peraridilitoris sp. nov., isolated from a coastal desert. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:1408-1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Riccio, M. L., G. M. Rossolini, G. Lombardi, A. Chiesurin, and G. Satta. 1997. Expression cloning of different bacterial phosphatase-encoding genes by histochemical screening of genomic libraries onto an indicator medium containing phenolphthalein diphosphate and methyl green. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82:177-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  • 38.Tanaka, M., A. M. Earl, H. A. Howell, M. J. Park, J. A. Eisen, S. N. Peterson, and J. R. Battista. 2004. Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans's transcriptional response to ionizing radiation and desiccation reveals novel proteins that contribute to extreme radioresistance. Genetics 168:21-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.White, O., J. A. Eisen, J. F. Heidelberg, E. K. Hickey, J. D. Peterson, R. J. Dodson, D. H. Haft, M. L. Gwinn, W. C. Nelson, D. L. Richardson, K. S. Moffat, H. Qin, L. Jiang, W. Pamphile, M. Crosby, M. Shen, J. J. Vamathevan, P. Lam, L. McDonald, T. Utterback, C. Zalewski, K. S. Makarova, L. Aravind, M. J. Daly, K. W. Minton, R. D. Fleischmann, K. A. Ketchum, K. E. Nelson, S. Salzberg, H. O. Smith, J. C. Venter, and C. M. Fraser. 1999. Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science 286:1571-1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu, G., H. Lu, L. Wang, H. Chen, Z. Xu, Y. Hu, B. Tian, and Y. Hua. 2010. DdrB stimulates single-stranded DNA annealing and facilitates RecA-independent DNA repair in Deinococcus radiodurans. DNA Repair 9:805-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yannone, S. M., and B. K. Burgess. 1997. Identification of a palindromic sequence that is responsible for the up-regulation of NAPDH-ferredoxin reductase in a ferredoxin I deletion strain of Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Biol. Chem. 272:14454-14458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zahradka, K., D. Slade, A. Bailone, S. Sommer, D. Averbeck, M. Petranovic, A. B. Lindner, and M. Radman. 2006. Reassembly of shattered chromosomes in Deinococcus radiodurans. Nature 443:569-573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zimmerman, J. M., and J. R. Battista. 2005. A ring-like nucleoid is not necessary for radioresistance in the Deinococcaceae. BMC Microbiol. 5:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES