Abstract
Background
Multiple pregnancies have become more common in the industrialized world because of rising maternal ages and advances in reproductive medicine.
Methods
Selective literature review.
Results
Multiple pregnancy carries a higher risk of prematurity, intrauterine growth restriction, and prenatal death, as well as elevated risks to the mother including preeclampsia, diabetes, and hemorrhage during delivery. Genetic tests and ultrasonography are the most important tests for monitoring during pregnancy. Ultrasound aids in the detection of the feto-fetal transfusion syndrome and in the determination of zygosity.
Conclusions
The care of women with multiple pregnancies requires the collaboration of specialists in prenatal medicine, obstetrics, and neonatology as well as a properly functioning integration of outpatient and inpatient care.
Multiple pregnancies have become more common in the industrialized world due to advances in reproductive medicine. As a result, obstetric care for women with multiple pregnancies and neonatal care for multiple babies have become more intense and challenging. Specialists in prenatal medicine, obstetricians, and neonatologists in hospitals and in private practice are faced with a whole array of challenges.
In order to facilitate competent collaboration at these interfaces, the authors compiled key messages in this review article on the basis of scientific and clinical insights and a selective literature search including established national (1) and international (2) guidelines.
Frequency
Worldwide, the frequency of multiple births is subject to vast variations. Hellin’s rule of 1895 for predicting the rates of multiple births has more or less retained its validity to this day. If the rate for twins is 1 : 85, the rate for triplets is 1 : 85 × 85, and for quadruplets, 1 : 85 × 85 × 85. In early pregnancy, these rates are much higher. Boklage described the development of 325 twin pregnancies; 19% of these resulted in twin births at term, 39% in singleton births, and 43% in stillbirths. He calculated a probable conception rate for twins of 1 : 8 (3).
In most European countries, the rate of twins fell in the 1960s from about 12/1000 pregnancies to 9.5/1000 pregnancies. From the early 1980s, numbers rose again, to 12/1000 and, by about 1990, to 13 to 14/1000 pregnancies. While the trend in the 1960s and 1970s was primarily a function of the changed age structure of pregnant women (mostly an increase in pregnancies in younger women, later an increase in pregnancies in women older than 35), the rise after 1990 is regarded mainly as a consequence of developments in reproductive medicine (assisted reproductive technologies) (4). Induced ovulation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) are considered to be the main causes underlying the increase.
The occurrence of multiple births in the mother’s family is more important for the frequency of dizygous twins than such an occurrence in the father’s family. Women who themselves were one of a pair of dizygous twins had twins in about 2% of cases. By contrast, only 1% of women whose husbands were dizygous twins gave birth to twins themselves (e1).
Duration of pregnancy
The average term of pregnancy is notably shorter in multiple pregnancies (table) (e2). In 1987, the rate of premature births for twins (<37+0 weeks’ gestation) in the US was 44.5% compared with 9.4% for singletons (5). Presumed reasons for the shorter pregnancies include the mechanical stress on the cervix, the fact that uterine circulation is reduced relative to the weight of fetus and placenta, and the relatively reduced placental function. Further, the maturation of the gap junctions—owing to raised estrogen activity and prostaglandin synthesis—and the relative drop in progesterone activity in multiple pregnancies seemed to be relevant for the shortened term.
Table. Average duration of multiple pregnancies.
Type of pregnancy | Weeks |
Singleton | 39 |
Twins | 36 |
Triplets | 32 |
Quadruplets | 30 |
Prenatal ultrasonography
Perinatal mortality has fallen thanks to the increased detection rate of multiple fetuses. In Germany, ultrasonographic investigations in all pregnant women, according to maternity guidelines, have resulted in a situation where almost all multiple pregnancies are detected. Early detection is important for management of the pregnancy, for monitoring mother and babies, as well as for intrapartum management and to prepare the parents.
Standardized curves can be used to diagnose multiple pregnancies, determine gestational age, and monitor fetal growth. It is important to point out that fetal growth curves for head diameter and femur length do not differ statistically for singletons and twins (e3, e4). A differentiated examination for malformations is indicated.
Further, investigations specific to multiple pregnancies are important, to determine zygosity and placentation.
Determination of zygosity: the basics
Monozygous twins
Monozygous twins originate from the division of a single embryo. The estimated rate is 4 monozygous twins in 1000 births. Embryo-fetal mortality in monozygous twins is higher than in dizygous twins and singletons. The rate of serious malformations in monozygous twins is reported at 2.3%, compared with 1% in singletons. The rate of slight malformations is 4.1% for monozygous twins, compared with 2.5% in singletons. Statistically less favorable results have been noted for monochorionic, monoamniotic twins; pregnancies of 2 girls have yielded better results in this context (e5). If embryo splitting occurs within 5 days after fertilization, dichorionic-diamniotic twins will result (30% of cases of monocygotic twin pregnancies). Embryo splitting between the 5th and 7th days of fertilization will result in monochorionic-diamniotic twins (70% of cases). In 1% of cases, embryo splitting occurs after day 8, resulting in monochorionic-monoamniotic twins. Conjoined twins are the consequence of incomplete division on days 15 or 17 after fertilization. In Europe, about 1 in 33 000 births results in conjoined twins (e6).
Dizygous twins
Fertilization of 2 different ova from 2 different follicles results in dizygous twins. Follicular growth is regulated by the gonadotropins. It has been stated that higher concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) result in higher numbers of dizygous twins. The production of FSH is influenced by periods of light and darkness. In Scandinavia, a larger number of dizygous twins is said to be conceived in July, and a lower number in January. The probability of having dizygous twins rises with a maternal age up to about 39 years and drops afterwards. It also falls in periods of malnutrition (e7).
Higher multiples
Multiple pregnancies with higher numbers of fetuses can arise from the fertilization of 1, 2, or more ova and division of 1 or more fertilized ova, with the result of a multiple pregnancy that is simultaneously dizygous and monozygous.
Knowing the zygosity is important to correctly assess risk factors during the pregnancy. One possible consequence, for example, is a difference in growth in a scenario of deficient intrauterine development of one twin, or in the feto-fetal transfusion syndrome; the latter, however, affects exclusively monozygous twins.
Ultrasonography is the indispensable diagnostic tool for detecting zygosity. At 10 to 15 weeks of pregnancy, in dichorionic pregnancies, the lambda shape (“twin peak”) of the ovum’s separating membrane is visible at the placental insertion (figure 1). Separate placentas or a (fused) placenta, as well as membrane thickness (monozygous twins have a thin membrane, dizygous twins have a thick membrane) are important findings.
The physiological disappearance of an embryo or early fetus from a multiple pregnancy (vanishing twin) leads to resorption, an empty amniotic sac, or a fetus papyraceus. Clinically, this process is usually noticed only as a hemorrhage from the uterus.
Prenatal genetic diagnostic testing
Since the 1970s, women have been offered genetic diagnostic tests; this obviously also applies to multiple pregnancies.
Amniocentesis in the second trimester and chorionic villus sampling are the methods of choice. The complication rate for amniocentesis in multiple pregnancies has been reported to be 5 times higher than for singleton pregnancies (0.6% to 1%) (e8).
Selective feticide
The most common and most important risks for multiple pregnancies are the shortened pregnancy term and the increased risks for the mother: for triplets, 20% pre-eclampsia, 30% anemia, 35% postpartum hemorrhage; for quadruplets, 32% pre-eclampsia, 25% anemia, 21% postpartum hemorrhage (6, e9, e10).
Selective reduction of higher multiple pregnancies to twins is undertaken with the aim of reducing the risks to the mother’s or fetuses’ lives. Several methods are in common use—hysterotomy, cardiac puncture, intracardiac air injection, or injection of cardiotoxic substances—on the basis of experiences with indicated feticide in a scenario of malformations of one of the fetuses (7).
Working groups that have often been faced with the problem of selective feticide believe that transabdominal intrathoracic injection of potassium chloride into embryos aged 11 to 12 weeks is the most effective method (8). In many authors’ opinion, the gains for the surviving fetuses justify the procedure (9, e11). When injecting monozygous twins, it needs to be borne in mind that injecting a cardiotoxic substance into one twin may result in the substance transfusing into the other twin, which constitutes a substantial risk. In 10% of pregnant women, complete loss of pregnancy after selective feticide is to be expected.
Selective feticide is extremely problematic and should be avoided by using appropriate artificial reproductive techniques.
The feto-fetal transfusion syndrome (FFTS)
Monozygous, monochorionic twin pregnancies are characterized by interfetal vascularization at the placental level, arterio-arterial and veno-venous anastomoses on the chorionic plate, as well as arterio-venous shunts in the cotyledons (e12). These form the basis for a redistribution of the blood, whose causes have thus far remained unexplained. One possible explanation is that the placental circulation of the donor fetus has increased vascular resistance, owing to placental insufficiency, which causes redistribution of the blood. The acceptor twin will grow larger (9, e13) and develop polyglobulinemia, and/or hypervolemia (acceptor) as well as polyhydramnion, whereas the donor fetus will experience intrauterine growth restriction, anemia, and hypovolemia and develop oligohydramnion. A diagnostic clue is provided by the association of intrauterine weight differences (of more than 20%) and the difference in volume of amniotic fluid seen on ultrasonography (polyhydramnion in the acceptor, oligohydramnion in the donor). The volume of amniotic fluid may decrease to the point where the donor twin, as the small twin, is pressed into the membrane of the ovum (stuck twin) (figure 2).
Death rates in FFTS are high (56% to 100%). In 3% to 5% of cases, fetal death occurs in the uterus (10). After the death of one twin, the so called twin embolization syndrome develops in up to 14% of cases (e14). The result is arterial hypotension and embolization of thromboplastic material from the dead fetus into the surviving fetus. The consequences are disseminated intravascular clotting and/or infarction with severe neurological damage, among others (11), so any intervention should take place before an intrauterine fetal death occurs.
Treatment options for FFTS include:
Repeated amniocentesis and drainage of amniotic fluid; although the pathogenetic mechanism of this treatment is not clear, repeated amniocentesis is an effective method (e15, e16).
Elective coagulation of the interfetal vascular links is the logical and most stringent therapeutic option (e15, 12, 13).
Intrauterine death
Antepartum death of one or more fetuses in multiple pregnancies is common (1% to 5% of all multiple pregnancies) (e17). In addition to the emotional and psychological burden for the parents, particular attention should be paid to the state of the surviving fetuses (e18).
In monochorionic fetuses with a dead sibling, the surviving fetuses can be expected to have a high rate of neurological impairments. These are thought to be caused by embolization of thrombogenic material from the dead fetus into the surviving one(s).
Reducing the risk of premature birth
The fact that multiple fetuses are at higher perinatal risk than singletons can be explained with the high rate of premature births and the higher rate of babies whose intrauterine growth is restricted. The rate of complications as a result of immaturity and underweight for twins is 40%. The reported rate of premature birth for twins is 30%—3 to 5 times higher than that of comparable cohorts of singleton pregnancies. In addition to early diagnosis of multiple pregnancies, early “unfit to work” notes (at 20 weeks’ gestation) and physical rest are recognized as preventive measures (e19, e20); neither inpatient treatment without further risk, nor preventive cerclage (e21), nor prophylactic tocolysis (e22) are any longer among the recommended procedures.
Intrauterine growth restriction
In multiple pregnancies, several factors contribute to intrauterine growth restriction, whose frequency in this setting is reported to be 60% (e23): the mother’s nutritional status, reduced uterine blood flow, anomalies of the umbilical cord, placental nutrient transport capacity, position of the placenta, unequal proportions of the placental mass per fetus, and the feto-fetal transfusion syndrome (FFTS).
Determining the gestation of delivery in multiple pregnancy
To avoid intrauterine fetal death near term, a common recommendation these days is that of arranging delivery at 38 weeks’ gestation. In women who are planning to have a vaginal birth, the usual procedure is to administer prostaglandin for cervical ripening. The following indications usually mean that at this gestational age, caesarean section as the primary indication is undertaken:
Triplets or higher multiples
The preceding sibling is in breech or transverse position
Estimated weight on ultrasonography of the second twin of more than 500 g above that of the first twin
Twins with an ultrasound guided estimated weight below 1800 g
Monoamniotic twins (C-section in 34+0 weeks’ gestation) (figure 3).
Neonatal morbidity and mortality
In the literature, the data on whether a multiple pregnancy per se increases neonatal morbidity and mortality are inconsistent. This is partly due to different study populations, different study designs (prospective or retrospective data collection), and different time periods (before or after introduction of surfactant therapy and of intrauterine laser ablation). Neonatal morbidity and mortality rise with the number of fetuses in a pregnancy, but simultaneously the term of the pregnancy decreases so that problems associated with premature birth gain importance. Comparisons between singletons and multiple siblings always need to consider the gestational age, birth weight, and sex (14, e24).
Neonatal mortality
Compared with singletons, twins develop intrauterine growth restriction after about 32 weeks’ gestation, and triplets after 29 weeks’ gestation (15). In multiple fetuses with a birth weight below the 10th percentile, neonatal mortality is increased. Once gestational age, extent of growth restriction, and sex have been adjusted for, however, neonatal mortality in twins with fetal growth restriction is similar to that of singletons (e25, 15, 16). In this context, twins’ discordant weight seems to have an important role. Increased neonatal mortality has been described for a weight difference of more than 25%. Primarily the smaller twin is affected, especially if s/he has a birth weight below the 10th percentile (17– 19). If the weight difference is great, however, the larger twin also seems to have a higher mortality risk (e26, 20).
An increase in neonatal mortality has been described for monochorionic twins compared with dichorionic twins, especially if one twin underwent intrauterine death (21, 22).
Data differ with regard to the question whether the sequence of birth has an influence in the prognosis. In very small twins (birth weight below 1500 g), an increased mortality risk has been described for the second twin, independently of the delivery mode (e27). Others have not found any such differences (15).
Neonatal morbidity
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
The frequency of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome increases with the number of siblings (23% in triplets, 65% in quadruplets, 75% in quintuplets), however, this is in a scenario of decreasing gestational age (e27, e24). The risk of respiratory problems is higher in boys and in the second twin (23, e28). A complete cycle of prenatally administered steroids reduces the incidence of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome for multiple or singleton births (e27). However, a decreasing effect of prenatal lung maturation has been described for increasing plurality (24).
Cerebral impairments
The frequency of cerebral impairments is strongly influenced by gestational age and birth weight, for singletons as well as for multiple fetuses. But chorionicity and intrauterine fetal death of a sibling also play a large part. A meta-analysis of 28 studies found that the risk of neurological damage in the surviving twin is 4 times higher in monochorionic than in dichorionic twins (22).
Necrotizing enterocolitis
The risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in monochorionic twins was found to be increased by a factor of 4 (3.8% versus 0.9%) after gestational age and birth weight had been adjusted for (21).
Long term results
Children from multiple pregnancies have an increased risk of neurological abnormalities. Parents should be informed about this risk, and appropriate regular postnatal examinations should be organized (25).
Key Messages.
Multiple pregnancies are on the increase.
Risks for the baby—such as premature birth, growth restriction, and intrauterine death—are higher, as are risks for the mother (such as pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and hemorrhages).
Ultrasonography is important to monitor the pregnancy, to detect growth discrepancies, zygosity, and in the feto-fetal transfusion syndrome.
Neonatal morbidity of multiple fetuses are characterized by neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and cerebral damage.
Providing care for women with multiple pregnancies constitutes a challenge for specialists in prenatal medicine, obstetricians, and neonatologists.
Acknowledgments
Translated from the original German by Dr Birte Twisselmann.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
References
- 1.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Perinatale Medizin. Betreuung der Mehrlingsschwangerschaft und Leitung der Mehrlingsgeburt. Perinatalmedizin. 1990;2:1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 2.ACOG Practice Bulletin. Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet and high-order multifetal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104 doi: 10.1097/00006250-200410000-00046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boklage CE. Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term. Int J Fertil. 1990;35:75–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Borkenhagen A, Stöbel-Richter Y, Brähler E, Kentenich H. Mehrlingsproblem bei Kinderwunschpaaren. Gynäk Endokrinol. 2004;2:163–168. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Taffel SM, Keith LG, Papiernik E. Demographic trends in twin births: USA. Multiple pregnancy. Epidemiology, gestation and perinatal outcome. In: Keith DM, Luke B, editors. Parthenon. New York, London: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ludwig M, Kohl M, Krüger A, et al. Komplikationen bei höhergradigen Mehrlingsschwangerschaften für Mütter und Kinder. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2004;64:168–177. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Evans MI, Goldberg JD, Dommergues M, Wagner RJ. Efficacy of second-trimester selective termination for fetal abnormalities: international collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(1):90–94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Berkowitz RL, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berger P. First-trimester transabdominal multifetal pregnancy reduction: a report of two hundred completed cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:17–21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90124-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.ACOG Committee Opinion. Multifetal pregnancy reduction. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1511–1515. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000263906.54824.f2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carlson NJ, Towers C. Multiple gestation complicated by the death of one fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maier RF, Bialobrzeski B, Gross A, Vogel M, Dudenhausen JW, Obladen M. Acute and chronic fetal hypoxia in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:973–977. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00290-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hecher K, Hackeloer BJ, Ville Y. Umbilical cord coagulation by operative microendoscopy at 16 weeks’ gestation in an acardiac twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:130–132. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M, Paupe A, Winer N, Ville Y. Endo-scopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:136–144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ballabh P, Kumari J. Neonatal outcome of triplet versus twin and singleton pregnancies: a matched case control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;107:28–36. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00270-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Garite TJ, Clark RH. Twins and triplets: the effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:700–707. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Odibo AO, McDonald RE. Perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted twins compared with age-matched growth-restricted singletons. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22:269–273. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bagchi S, Salihu HM. Birth weight discordance in multiple gestations: occurrence and outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:291–296. doi: 10.1080/01443610600594724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blickstein I, Keith LG. Neonatal mortality rates among growth-discordant twins, classified according to the birth weight of the smaller twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wen SW, Fung KF. Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in a Canadian population: the effect of intrapair birthweight discordance. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22:279–286. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Demissie K, Ananth CV. Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: the role of intrapair birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:474–480. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01951-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hack KE, Derks JB. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG. 2008;115:58–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ong SS, Zamora J. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG. 2006;113:992–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Canpolat FE, Yurdakok M. Birthweight discordance in twins and the risk of being heavier for respiratory distress syndrome. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9:659–663. doi: 10.1375/183242706778553372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Blickstein I, Shinwell ES. Plurality-dependent risk of respiratory distress syndrome among very-low-birth-weight infants and antepar-tum corticosteroid treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:360–364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moore AMM, O’Brien K. Follow up issues with multiples. Paediatr Child Health. 2006;11:283–286. doi: 10.1093/pch/11.5.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e1.White C, Wyshak G. Inheritance in human dizygotic twinning. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:1003–1005. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196411052711908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e2.Gonen R, Heyman E, Asztalos EV. The outcome of triplet, quadruplet and quimtuplet pregnancies managed in a perinatal unit: Obstetric, neonatal and follow-up data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:454–459. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90407-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e3.Reece AE, Yartoni S, Abdalla M. A prospective longitudinal study of groth in twin gestations compared with growth in singeleton pregnancies. I. The fetal head. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;19 doi: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.8.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e4.Reece AE, Yartoni S, Abdalla M. A prospective longitudinal study of groth in twin gestations compared with growth in singeleton pregnancies. II. The fetal imbs. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;19 doi: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.8.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e5.Cameron AH. The Birmingham twin survey. ProcR Soc Med. 1968;61 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e6.Imaizumi Y. Conjoined twins in Japan 1979-1985. Acta Gen Med Genell. 1988;37 doi: 10.1017/s0001566000003937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e7.Eriksson AW, Bressers WMA, Kostense PI. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. Vol. 37. Roma: 1988. Twinning rate in Scandinavia, Germany and The Netherlands during years of privation; pp. 277–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e8.Anderson RL, Goldberg JD, Goldbus MS. Prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestation: 20 years’ experience with amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn. 1991;11:263–270. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970110408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e9.Collins MS, Bleyl JA. Seventy-one quadruplet pregnancies: managementt and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162 doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90896-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e10.Syrop CH, Warner MW. Triplet gestations: Maternal and neonatal implications. Acta Gen Med Genell. 1985;34 doi: 10.1017/s0001566000004955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e11.Lipitz S, Reichmann B, Uval J, et al. A prospective comparison of the outcome of triplet pregnancies manged exspectantly or by multi fetal reduction to twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170 doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70301-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e12.Bajora R, Wigglesworth J, Fisk NM. Angioarchitecture of monochorionic placentas in relation to the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172 doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e13.D’Alton ME, Newton ER, Cetrulo CI. Intrauterine fetal demise in multiple gestation. Acta Ben Med Gemell. 1984;35 doi: 10.1017/s0001566000007480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e14.Cheung VY, Bocking AD, Dasilva OP. Preterm discordant twins: what birth weight difference is significant? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172 doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e15.Blickstein I. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:714–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e16.Saunders NJ, Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH. Therapeutic amniocentesis in twin-twin transfusion syndrome appearing in the second trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:820–824. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91340-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e17.Kilby MD, Govind A, O’Brien PM. Outcome of twin pregnancies complicated by a single intrauterine death: a comparison with viable twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:107–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e18.Woo HHN, Sin SY, Tang LCH. Single foetal death in twin pregnancies: review of the maternal and neonatal outcomes and management. HKMJ. 2000;6:293–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e19.Kaminski M, Papiernik E. Multifactorial study on the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. A comparison between an empirical prediction and a discriminant analysis. J Perinat Med. 1974;237 doi: 10.1515/jpme.1974.2.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e20.Papiernik E, Kaminski M. Multifactorial study on the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. A study of the frequency of 30 predictive characteristics. J Perinat Med. 1974;2 doi: 10.1515/jpme.1974.2.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e21.Dor J, Shalev J, Mashiach S. Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first trimester following induced ovulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1982;13 doi: 10.1159/000299484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e22.Gummerus M, Helonen O. Prophylactic tocolysis of twins. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e23.Miller HC, Merritt TA. Year Book Medical Publishers. Chicago: 1979. Fetal growth in humans. [Google Scholar]
- e24.Strauss A, Paek BW. Multifetal gestation — maternal and perinatal outcome of 112 pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2002;17:209–217. doi: 10.1159/000059372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e25.Baker ER, Beach ML. A comparison of neonatal outcomes of age-matched, growth-restricted twins and growth-restricted singletons. Am J Perinatol. 1997;14:499–502. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e26.Branum AM, Schoendorf KC. The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:570–574. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e27.Shinwell ES, Blickstein I. Excess risk of mortality in very low birthweight triplets: a national, population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88 F36 doi: 10.1136/fn.88.1.F36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e28.Hacking D, Watkins A. Respiratory distress syndrome and antenatal corticosteroid treatment in premature twins. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2001;85:F77–F78. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.1.F75g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]