Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Psychiatry logoLink to Indian Journal of Psychiatry
. 2002 Oct-Dec;44(4):362–364.

RELIABILITY OF THE ICD-10 INTERNATIONAL PERSONALITY DISORDER EXAMINATION (IPDE) (HINDI VERSION): A PRELIMINARY STUDY

Pratap Sharan *,*, P Kulhara , SK Verma , Manju Mohanty §
PMCID: PMC2955308  PMID: 21206601

Abstract

The study was aimed at estimating the joint-rater reliability and applicability of Hindi version of ICD-10 IPDE that was obtained following a standard translation protocol. The instrument was administered to 22 non-psychotic patients by two raters. The average intraclass correlation for each item (0.89), number of criteria met per disorder (0.92) and dimensional scores (0.98) was high. Kappa for definite (0.65-0.78) and probaole personality disorder (PD) (0.78-1.00) and for presence/absence of any PD (0.78) was acceptable. Overall weighted kappa was 0.81 for definite and 0.91 for probable PD. Findings suggest that ICD-10 IPDE (Hindi version) has acceptable joint- rater reliability and applicability in the North Indian Hindi speaking population.

Keywords: International Personality disorder Examination, Hindi Version, Reliability

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Grove W. M., Andreasen N. C., McDonald-Scott P., Keller M. B., Shapiro R. W. Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis. Theory and practice. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 Apr;38(4):408–413. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290042004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mann A. H., Raven P., Pilgrim J., Khanna S., Velayudham A., Suresh K. P., Channabasavanna S. M., Janca A., Sartorius N. An assessment of the Standardized Assessment of Personality as a screening instrument for the International Personality Disorder Examination: a comparison of informant and patient assessment for personality disorder. Psychol Med. 1999 Jul;29(4):985–989. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798007545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Spitzer R. L., Forman J. B., Nee J. DSM-III field trials: I. Initial interrater diagnostic reliability. Am J Psychiatry. 1979 Jun;136(6):815–817. doi: 10.1176/ajp.136.6.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Verheul R., Hartgers C., Van den Brink W., Koeter M. W. The effect of sampling, diagnostic criteria and assessment procedures on the observed prevalence of DSM-III-R personality disorders among treated alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Mar;59(2):227–236. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zimmerman M. Diagnosing personality disorders. A review of issues and research methods. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;51(3):225–245. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030061006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES