Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2010 Oct 6;132(42):14819–14824. doi: 10.1021/ja104609m

Expanding the Genetic Code of Yeast for Incorporation of Diverse Unnatural Amino Acids via a Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase/tRNA Pair

Susan M Hancock 1,, Rajendra Uprety 1,, Alexander Deiters 1,, Jason W Chin 1,†,
PMCID: PMC2956376  PMID: 20925334

Abstract

graphic file with name ja-2010-04609m_0005.jpg

We report the discovery of a simple system through which variant pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNACUAPyl pairs created in Escherichia coli can be used to expand the genetic code of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the process we have solved the key challenges of producing a functional tRNACUA in yeast and discovered a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNACUAPyl pair that is orthogonal in yeast. Using our approach we have incorporated an alkyne-containing amino acid for click chemistry, an important post-translationally modified amino acid and one of its analogs, a photocaged amino acid and a photo-cross-linking amino acid into proteins in yeast. Extensions of our approach will allow the growing list of useful amino acids that have been incorporated in E. coli with variant pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNACUA pairs to be site-specifically incorporated into proteins in yeast.

Introduction

The pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNACUAPyl (PylRS/tRNACUA) pairs from Methanosarcina barkeri (Mb) and M. mazei (Mm) are orthogonal in Escherichia coli.(1) These pairs have been evolved to direct the site-specific incorporation of a range of unnatural amino acids, including amino acids that are post-translationally modified, amino acids containing bio-orthogonal chemical handles, and amino acids protected with light- and acid-sensitive groups, into proteins in E. coli in response to the amber codon.16 In contrast to other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs for the incorporation of unnatural amino acids, which are orthogonal in either eukaryotic or prokaryotic hosts, the PylRS/tRNACUAPyl pairs are orthogonal in both E. coli and mammalian cells.2,6,7 Several unnatural amino acids have been site-specifically incorporated into proteins in mammalian cells by evolving the synthetase/tRNA pair in E. coli and subsequently transferring it to mammalian cells. This approach has the advantage of bypassing the requirement to evolve the amino acid specificity of the synthetase directly in a eukaryotic host.810

Many biological processes are more effectively addressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae than in mammalian cells. Yeast has a rapid doubling time, bar-coded libraries of gene knockouts exist, protein interaction and transcriptome data is most complete, tap-tagged strains are readily available and powerful genetic approaches can be simply implemented. However, the requirement to evolve the current orthogonal pairs directly in yeast has limited the scope of unnatural amino acids that have been incorporated in yeast.

Preliminary work by Yokoyama and co-workers introduced a PylRS/tRNACUAPyl pair into yeast and reported very weak phenotypes consistent with poor incorporation of Nε-tert-butyl-oxycarbonyl-l-lysine,(7) but a properly characterized system for incorporating amino acids using PylRS/tRNACUA pairs has not been reported. Here we report the creation and characterization of a functional and orthogonal PylRS/tRNACUAPyl pair in yeast and demonstrate the incorporation of several useful unnatural amino acids using variants of this pair created in E. coli (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Genetically encoded incorporation of new unnatural amino acids in yeast. (A) Unnatural amino acids used in this study. (B) Amber suppression by foreign tRNAs in yeast. (a) The tRNA gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase III using A- and B-box promoter sequences internal to the structural gene. (b) Processing of tRNA precursor involving cleavage of 5′ and 3′ ends and addition of 3′-CCA. (c) Export to the cytoplasm for aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with an unnatural amino acid. (d) Ribosome-mediated incorporation of the unnatural amino acid in response to an amber codon on the mRNA. (e) Production of a full length protein containing an unnatural amino acid at the genetically defined site.

Results and Discussion

To investigate the amber suppressor activity and potential orthogonality of the MbPylRS/tRNACUAPyl pair in S. cerevisiae we used MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG) cells.8,9 This yeast strain contains a GAL4 transcriptional activator gene bearing amber codons, is auxotrophic for histidine, and contains HIS3 and LacZ genes on GAL4-activated promoters. When a functional amber suppression system, such as the EcTyrRS/tRNACUA pair,8,9 is transformed into this strain, full length GAL4 is produced, leading to activation of LacZ and HIS3 genes. Transcription of these genes allows cells to grow in the absence of histidine and turn blue in the presence of X-Gal.

We replaced the functional EcTyrRS/tRNACUATyr pair with the MbPylRS/MbtRNACUA pair (Figure 2B construct 1) and supplemented with Nε-[(2-propynyloxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (1) (Figure 1A, a known substrate for MbPylRS(5)) in MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG). These cells were unable to grow in media lacking histidine and did not turn blue in the presence of X-Gal, suggesting that this original construct is not functional (Figure 2D). We demonstrated by western blot that the yeast codon-optimized MbPylRS was expressed in yeast cells (data not shown). However, analysis of northern blots indicated that MbtRNACUAPyl was not transcribed from our initial construct (Figure 2C). Since the EctRNACUA gene contains the consensus A- and B-box RNA polymerase III promoter sequences that direct its transcription in yeast,(11) but MbtRNACUAPyl does not (Figure 2A), it seemed likely that additional promoter elements would be required to direct the transcription of MbtRNACUA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Creating a functional tRNACUAPyl in yeast. (A) The consensus A- and B-box sequences and the A- and B-box sequences of MbtDNACUA. (B) The MbtDNACUAPyl expression constructs created and examined in this work. Constructs 6a−d were created using the 5′ and 3′ flanks from distinct tRNAs as described in the text. (C) Northern blots for MbtDNACUA expression from various constructs. (D) Phenotyping constructs for amber suppression in MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG) cells, where 3AT is 3-aminotriazole and 1 was used at 2 mM. Cells contained MbPylRS and the appropriate MbtDNACUAPyl expression construct.

To address the challenge of creating new promoter elements to direct the transcription of MbtRNACUAPyl, we investigated strategies to introduce A- and B-box sequences into our tRNA expression construct. We first mutated the sequence of the MbtRNACUA gene to contain either near-consensus A box sequences (A11C/U15G/T24G, Figure 2B construct 2) or B box sequences (A56C, Figure 2B construct 3). Northern blot analysis demonstrated that the A56C mutation in the B box, led to very low but detectable levels of the mutant MbtRNACUAPyl (Supporting Information Figure 1), while expression of the (A11C/U15G/T24G) mutant tRNA was not detectable by northern blot. However, when the A56C mutant of MbtRNACUA and MbPylRS were transferred to MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG) in the presence of 1, we did not observe phenotypes consistent with amber suppression (Figure 2D). This implies that either the tRNA is transcribed but not correctly folded or processed, or that the mutation abolishes synthetase recognition. Combining the A- and B-box mutations (Figure 2B construct 4) led to low levels of detectable tRNA production (Supporting Information Figure 1), but did not give phenotypes consistent with amber suppression (Figure 2D).

Since enhancing the transcription of MbtRNACUAPyl by mutation of the A- and B-box sequences within the structural gene did not produce a functional amber suppressor, we next investigated the potential of constructs that might augment the transcription of MbtRNACUA using extragenic sequences. The 5′-leader sequence of the yeast SNR52 primary transcript contains A- and B-box promoters that are post-transcriptionally removed to produce mature SNR52 snoRNA.(12) A previous report suggested that adding 5′-SNR52 and 3′-SUP4 flanking sequences to EctDNACUATyr and EctDNACUA enhanced their amber suppression in yeast.(13) When MbtRNACUAPyl was cloned between 5′-SNR52 and 3′-SUP4 flanking sequences (Figure 2B construct 5), we could detect weak MbtRNACUA transcription by northern blot (Figure 2C), and when the cassette was transformed into MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG) containing MbPylRS and grown in the presence of 1, we observed blue coloration on X-Gal plates but not growth in the absence of histidine in the presence of 40 mM 3-aminotriazole (3AT) (Figure 2D). These data suggest that addition of extragenic A- and B-box sequences via the 5′-SNR52 and 3′-SUP4 flanking sequences can partially compensate for the absence of consensus A- and B-box sequences in MbtRNACUAPyl. However, since the EcTyrRS/tRNACUA orthogonal pair supports growth on media lacking histidine and containing 40 mM 3AT8,9 but this system does not, we decided that the system was suboptimal and opted to explore further extragenic sequences.

The yeast U6 (SNR6) gene assembles the same RNA polymerase III transcriptional machinery as tRNA genes but possesses an additional TATA-box promoter element 30 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site that binds TFIIIB.(14) The TATA-box enables TFIIIC-independent RNA polymerase III recruitment and is proposed to overcome the large separation (240 bp) of the A- and B-box promoter elements of this gene.(15) Several yeast tRNAs, some of which contain large introns between the A- and B-boxes, have TATA boxes that allow TFIIIC-independent RNA polymerase transcription.(15) We reasoned that by incorporating the flanking sequences of these genes into our tRNA cassettes it may be possible to compensate for the poor A- and B-box consensus of MbtRNACUAPyl. We created constructs where the 5′-flanking region of SNR6, Ile{TAT}LR1, Pro{TGG}FL, and Asp{GTC}KR and the 3′-flanking region of SNR6 sandwich MbtRNACUA (Figure 2B constructs 6a−d). We also added a consensus sequence(16) found at the transcription start site of yeast tRNAs to the SNR6 construct. Northern blots revealed low-level tRNA production from construct 6a (Supporting Information Figure 1). However, we did not observe phenotypes consistent with amber suppression when any of these constructs were transformed into MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG) containing MbPylRS and grown in the presence of 1 (Figure 2D). These data suggested that, while these promoter elements may compensate for increases in the A- and B-box spacing, they cannot efficiently compensate for defects in the A- and B-box sequence in MbtRNACUAPyl.

Yeast possess an unusual dicistronic tDNAUCUArg−tDNAGUC gene in which the two mature tRNAs are generated from a single precursor RNA.(17) The A- and B-box promoter in the tDNAUCUArg gene directs the transcription of the precursor, and the transcription of tDNAGUC is entirely dependent on the promoter elements of tDNAUCUArg. This suggests that tDNAUCU may provide the A- and B-box sequences required to transcribe tDNAs inserted in place of tDNAGUCAsp.(18) Indeed replacing tDNAGUC with human initiator tDNA or a transcriptionally inactive yeast tyrosine suppressor tDNA allows these tDNAs to be transcribed and processed to produce functional tRNAs in yeast.(19)

To test this system for the transcription of MbtRNACUAPyl, we constructed a SctDNAUCUMbtDNACUAPyl cassette containing the natural 5′-, 3′-, and 10-base pair linker sequences (Figure 2B construct 7). Northern blot analysis revealed that MbtRNACUA was transcribed from this construct much more efficiently than any other construct tested (Figure 2C). When transformed into MaV203:pGADGAL4(2TAG) in the presence of MbPylRS and 1, the SctDNAUCUArgMbtDNACUA cassette conferred survival on media lacking histidine and containing 40 mM 3AT, and produced the strongest blue color of any construct tested when incubated with X-Gal (Figure 2D).

The tRNA constructs we discovered that are both transcribed (as judged by northern blot) and functional (as judged by phenotyping (constructs 5 and 7)) showed amber suppression phenotypes even in the absence of added amino acid 1: construct 5 is blue on X-Gal in the presence and absence of 1, and construct 7 is blue in the presence and absence of 1 and grows on media lacking histidine and containing 3AT in the presence and absence of 1. These experiments revealed that MbtRNACUAPyl is not orthogonal in yeast.

To identify the molecular basis of the non-orthogonality of MbtDNACUAPyl we examined the sequence of MbtRNACUA for nucleotides that match the positive identity elements within yeast tRNAs that are specifically recognized by yeast synthetases.(20) We realized that MbtRNACUAPyl contains an unusual G3·U70 base pair, which is a positive identity element by which yeast alanyl-tRNA synthetase recognizes SctRNAAla.(21) This suggested that MbtRNACUA may be aminoacylated by alanyl-tRNA synthetase in yeast. To test this hypothesis we expressed human superoxide dismutase (hSOD) bearing an amber codon at position 33 (from pC1 hSOD33TAG-His6 in the MJY125-derived strain SCY4(22)). Expression of hSOD was dependent on the presence of SctDNAUCUArgMbtDNACUA, but did not decrease substantially in the absence of 1 (Figure 3B), further confirming that the SctDNAUCUArgMbtDNACUA cassette confers efficient amber suppression, which is not dependent on MbPylRS. ESI-MS spectra of hSOD purified from expressions using MbPylRS/MbtRNACUAPyl in the absence of unnatural amino acid were consistent with the incorporation of alanine in response to the amber codon in hSOD33TAG (Figure 3C), confirming our hypothesis on the molecular basis of MbtDNACUA non-orthogonality.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MmtDNACUAPyl is orthogonal in yeast, but MbtDNACUA directs the incorporation of alanine and is not orthogonal in yeast. (A) Constructs used to compare orthogonality of tRNACUAPyl in yeast. (B) Analysis of amber suppression by expression of hSOD33TAG-His6 and detection by anti-His6 western blot. Yeast cells containing the hSOD expression plasmid, MbPylRS and the dicistronic SctDNAUCU−tDNACUAPyl construct were grown in the presence or absence of 1 (5 mM). (C) ESI-MS shows that alanine is incorporated into hSOD33TAG in cells producing amber suppressor MbtDNACUA from construct 7 (Found 16553 ± 1.5 Da, expected 16553 Da), confirming that MbtDNACUAPyl is a substrate for yeast alanyl-tRNA synthetases.

To create an MbtDNACUAPyl construct that is orthogonal in yeast we converted the G3·U70 base pair in MbtRNACUA to A3-U70. This changes MbtRNACUAPyl to MmtRNACUA (Figure 3A construct 8). Yeast containing MbPylRS/SctDNAUCUArgMmtDNACUA produced full-length hSOD-His6 from pC1SOD33TAG only in the presence of 1 (Figure 3B). These experiments establish that functional MmtRNACUAPyl is produced from the dicistronic construct and is orthogonal in yeast.

To begin to demonstrate the range of amino acids that can be incorporated in yeast using our approach, we incorporated the important post-translational modification Nε-acetyl-l-lysine (2) and its analog Nε-trifluoroacetyl-l-lysine (3), a photocaged lysine derivative Nε-[(1-(6-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethoxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (4), and photo-cross-linker Nε-[(2-(3-methyl-3H-diazirin-3-yl)ethoxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (5) into hSOD-His6 produced in S. cerevisiae (Figure 4A) using MbPylRS and variants of MbPylRS we have previously evolved in E. coli.13 While we have not specifically evolved a synthetase for Nε-trifluoroacetyl-l-lysine, we have found that AcKRS2,(1) previously evolved for incorporating Nε-acetyl-l-lysine, efficiently incorporates this amino acid. We demonstrated the incorporation of each amino acid by western blot (Figure 4A). We carried out large-scale expression and purification of hSOD in the presence of 1, 2, and 3 (Figure 4B), which unlike 4 and 5 are not photosensitive and are available in gram quantities, to further confirm the site and identity of amino acid incorporation by ESI-MS and MS/MS sequencing (Figure 4C−H). We have demonstrated the specific incorporation of an amino acid into SOD in the presence of 4 and 5. In addition we have reported MS and MS/MS data for the incorporation of amino acids 4 and 5 into proteins in other organisms.2,23 However, we have not yet obtained MS data directly in yeast and cannot rule out the possibility that an aspect of yeast metabolism—that is not conserved in either other eukaryotes or bacteria—leads to the selective post-translational modification of these amino acids in vivo. Purified hSOD yields were 30−100 μg/L of yeast culture which is similar to the 50 μg/L yield reported for incorporating p-acetyl-l-phenylalanine into hSOD using the EcTyrRS/tRNACUATyr pair in yeast.(8)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Characterization of unnatural amino acid incorporation in yeast with the orthogonal MbPylRS/MmtDNACUAPyl pair. (A) Amber suppression efficiency of hSOD33TAG-His6 in yeast in the presence or absence of 1 (5 mM), 2 (10 mM), 3 (10 mM), 4 (2 mM), or 5 (1.3 mM) by anti-His6 western blot. Yeast cells containing the hSOD expression construct were transformed with the dicistronic SctDNAUCUMmtDNACUAPyl construct for expressing the orthogonal MmtDNACUA in yeast and the appropriate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS). PylRS (wild-type MbPylRS), AcKRS (a variant of MbPylRS that has been evolved to use 2(3)), TfaKRS (a variant of MbPylRS that can use 3, see text), PcKRS (a variant of MbPylRS that has been evolved to use 4(2)). (B) Coomassie SDS-PAGE analysis of purified hSOD from expressions in the presence and absence of 1, 2, or 3. Full protein MS (C−E) and Glu-C MS/MS (F−H) confirm the incorporation of unnatural amino acids 1 (C/F found 16691 ± 1.5 Da, expected 16691 Da), 2 (D/G found 16651 ± 1.5 Da, expected 16651) and 3 (E/H found 16705 ± 1.5 Da, expected 16705) at the genetically encoded site. hSOD is copurified as a heterodimer with yeast SOD (minor additional peak in spectra at 15722 Da; identity was confirmed by Glu-C MS/MS). For full gels and western blots and larger versions of MS and MS/MS data see Supporting Information Figure 2.

Conclusions

In summary, we have solved the key challenges of producing a functional and orthogonal tRNACUAPyl in yeast. We have discovered an MbPylRS/tRNACUA pair that is orthogonal in yeast, and described a simple system through which variant MbPylRS/tRNACUAPyl pairs created in E. coli can be transplanted to expand the genetic code of yeast for a wide range of unnatural amino acids. Using our approach we have incorporated the alkyne-containing amino acid Nε-[(2-propynyloxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (1), an important post-translationally modified amino acid Nε-acetyl-l-lysine (2), and an analog of Nε-acetyl-l-lysine, trifluoroacetyl-l-lysine (3), a photocaged lysine derivative Nε-[(1-(6-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethoxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (4), and a photo-cross-linker Nε-[(2-(3-methyl-3H-diazirin-3-yl)ethoxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (5) into proteins in yeast. Amino acid 1 may be used for bio-orthogonal [3 + 2] cycloadditions in yeast proteins.(24) Amino acid 2 may be used for producing acetylated proteins directly in yeast and synthetically controlling processes normally regulated by acetylation in yeast. Amino acid 3 is a very poor substrate for sirtuins, but not for HDACs,(25) and should allow us to install irreversible acetylation at sites directly regulated by sirtuins in vivo. It should allow us to probe the deacetylases that act on a given site in a protein. Amino acid 4 is a photocaged lysine with demonstrated utility for controlling protein function in eukaryotic cells,(2) and we anticipate that genetically encoded photocontrol of proteins in yeast will be a powerful approach for gaining a temporal and spatial understanding of cellular processes. Amino acid 5 is a photo-cross-linking amino acid with demonstrated utility for mapping protein interactions in E. coli,(23) and we believe that this will find wide utility in mapping protein−protein interactions in yeast. Given the growing list of amino acids that can be incorporated using MbPylRS and its variants,16 we anticipate that our approach will allow the introduction of a wide range of chemical functional groups into yeast. Finally, the strategies we have explored for creating and expressing heterologous, orthogonal tRNAs in yeast may be useful for improving other orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNACUA pairs.810

Experimental Section

General Methods

Nε-[(2-Propynyloxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine,(5)Nε-[(1-(6-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethoxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine(2) and Nε-[(2-(3-methyl-3H-diazirin-3-yl)ethoxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine(23) were synthesized as previously reported. Nε-Acetyl-l-lysine and Nε-trifluoroacetyl-l-lysine were purchased from Bachem.

Northern Blot Analysis

Total RNA was purified from yeast cells using TRI reagent (Sigma) and ethanol precipitated. The RNA was denatured, separated on a 6% Novex TBE-urea gel (Invitrogen), blotted onto Biodyne B modified nylon membrane (Thermo Scientific), and cross-linked by UV fixation. The membrane was hybridized overnight at 55°C with a biotinylated probe 5′-GGAAACCCCGGGAATCTAACCCGGCTGAACGGATTTAGAG, which is specific for MbtDNACUAPyl. The hybridized probe was detected with North2South chemiluminescent hybridization and detection kit (Pierce). The number of cells was used to control the total amount of RNA loaded.

Phenotyping Yeast Cells

Phenotyping was performed as described in Chin et al..(8) Briefly, S. cerevisiae MaV203 (Invitrogen) was transformed by the lithium acetate method with the pGADGAL4(2TAG) reporter, pMbPylRS and tDNACUAPyl constructs. Overnight cultures were serially diluted and replica plated onto selective media in the presence or absence of 2 mM Nε-[(2-propynyloxy)carbonyl]-l-lysine (1). X-Gal assays were performed using the agarose overlay method.

Protein Expression, Purification, western blot Analysis, and Mass Spectrometry

Appropriate selective medium ± unnatural amino acid was inoculated with a stationary phase culture to give an OD600 ≈ 0.2. Cultures were grown at 30°C for 24−48 h. Proteins were extracted from yeast cells using Y-PER reagent (Thermo Scientific) containing complete, EDTA-free inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Clarified supernatants were separated by SDS-PAGE, and western blots were performed using anti-His6 (Qiagen). Human superoxide dismutase was purified using Ni2+-NTA resin (Qiagen) as previously described.(26) For expressions with Nε-acetyl-l-lysine (2), 20 mM nicotinamide was added to the cultures and to lysis buffers; for expressions with Nε-trifluoroacetyl-l-lysine (3), 10 mM sodium butyrate was added to the cultures and to lysis buffers. Protein concentration was determined using the Biorad Protein Assay in comparison to IgG standard. Total mass analysis was performed on a LCT time-of-flight mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization (Micromass) with protein solutions in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate and mixed 1:1 with 1% formic acid in 50% MeOH. Samples were injected at 10 μL·min−1, and calibration was performed in positive ion mode using horse heart myoglobin. MS/MS analysis was performed on a LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer on protein samples that were in-gel digested with Glu-C (Roche).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Farida Begum and Sew Peak-Chew (MRC-LMB) for mass spectrometry, and Heinz Neumann and Sebastian Greiss for assistance. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) UK and a European Research Council (ERC) StG to J.W.C.

Supporting Information Available

Supplementary figures, details of plasmid construction, and construct sequences. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Supplementary Material

ja104609m_si_001.pdf (537.5KB, pdf)

References

  1. Neumann H.; Peak-Chew S. Y.; Chin J. W. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4, 232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gautier A.; Nguyen D. P.; Lusic H.; An W.; Deiters A.; Chin J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Neumann H.; Hancock S. M.; Buning R.; Routh A.; Chapman L.; Somers J.; Owen-Hughes T.; van Noort J.; Rhodes D.; Chin J. W. Mol. Cell 2009, 36, 153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Zhao S.; Xu W.; Jiang W.; Yu W.; Lin Y.; Zhang T.; Yao J.; Zhou L.; Zeng Y.; Li H.; Li Y.; Shi J.; An W.; Hancock S. M.; He F.; Qin L.; Chin J.; Yang P.; Chen X.; Lei Q.; Xiong Y.; Guan K. L. Science 2010, 327, 1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Nguyen D. P.; Garcia Alai M. M.; Kapadnis P. B.; Neumann H.; Chin J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Fekner T.; Li X.; Lee M. M.; Chan M. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Li W. T.; Mahapatra A.; Longstaff D. G.; Bechtel J.; Zhao G.; Kang P. T.; Chan M. K.; Krzycki J. A. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 385, 1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Li X.; Fekner T.; Ottesen J. J.; Chan M. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Yanagisawa T.; Ishii R.; Fukunaga R.; Kobayashi T.; Sakamoto K.; Yokoyama S. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nguyen D. P.; Lusic H.; Neumann H.; Kapadnis P. B.; Deiters A.; Chin J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen P. R.; Groff D.; Guo J.; Ou W.; Cellitti S.; Geierstanger B. H.; Schultz P. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mukai T.; Kobayashi T.; Hino N.; Yanagisawa T.; Sakamoto K.; Yokoyama S. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 371, 818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chin J. W.; Cropp T. A.; Anderson J. C.; Mukherji M.; Zhang Z.; Schultz P. G. Science 2003, 301, 964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chin J. W.; Cropp T. A.; Chu S.; Meggers E.; Schultz P. G. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu N.; Deiters A.; Cropp T. A.; King D.; Schultz P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards H.; Schimmel P. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guffanti E.; Ferrari R.; Preti M.; Forloni M.; Harismendy O.; Lefebvre O.; Dieci G. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 23945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Q.; Wang L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brow D. A.; Guthrie C. Genes Dev. 1990, 4, 1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dieci G.; Percudani R.; Giuliodori S.; Bottarelli L.; Ottonello S. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 299, 601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raymond K. C.; Raymond G. J.; Johnson J. D. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 2649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmidt O.; Mao J.; Ogden R.; Beckmann J.; Sakano H.; Abelson J.; Söll D. Nature 1980, 287, 750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Kjellin-Straby K.; Engelke D. R.; Abelson J. DNA 1984, 3, 167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Reyes V. M.; Newman A.; Abelson J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986, 6, 2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. a Francis M. A.; Rajbhandary U. L. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 4486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Stråby K. B. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 2841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Giegé R.; Sissler M.; Florentz C. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. a Hou Y. M.; Schimmel P. Nature 1988, 333, 140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b McClain W. H.; Foss K. Science 1988, 240, 793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Summerer D.; Chen S.; Wu N.; Deiters A.; Chin J. W.; Schultz P. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 9785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chou C.; Uprety R.; Davis L.; Chin J. W.; Deiters A. Submitted 2010.
  24. a Kolb H. C.; Finn M. G.; Sharpless K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Meldal M.; Tornøe C. W. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. a Smith B. C.; Denu J. M. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 37256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Smith B. C.; Hallows W. C.; Denu J. M. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen S.; Schultz P. G.; Brock A. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja104609m_si_001.pdf (537.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES