Abstract
The International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB), the annual conference of the Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Network (APBioNet), is hosted in one of countries of the Asia-Pacific region. The 2010 conference was awarded to Japan and has attracted more than one hundred high-quality research paper submissions. Thorough peer reviewing resulted in 47 (43.5%) accepted papers out of 108 submissions. Submissions from Japan, R.O. Korea, P.R. China, Australia, Singapore and U.S.A totaled 43.8% and contributed to 57.4% of accepted papers. Manuscripts originating from Taiwan and India added up to 42.8% of submissions and 28.3% of acceptances. The fifteen articles published in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement cover disease informatics, structural bioinformatics and drug design, biological databases and software tools, signaling pathways, gene regulatory and biochemical networks, evolution and sequence analysis.
Introduction
InCoB (International Conference on Bioinformatics) is the official conference of the Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Network (APBioNet) http://www.apbionet.org/. Since the inaugural conference in Bangkok in 2002, InCoB developed into one of the largest bioinformatics conferences in the Asia-Pacific region [1]. We attribute the growth in part to publishing submissions as research articles in the conference supplement of a PubMed-indexed open-access journal with a reasonable impact factor. Since 2006 InCoB has published 82 articles in BMC Bioinformatics that were cited 436 times (as of May 2010). Three years later (InCoB2009 Singapore), the increasing number of submissions necessitated the addition of a second InCoB supplement in BMC Genomics[1].
InCoB annual conferences showcase the latest research and technologies in all areas of bioinformatics. This year's collaboration with Chem-Bio Informatics Society (CBI) http://www.cbi.or.jp of Japan and International Immunomics Society (IIMMS) http://www.iimms.org/ and support of the Japanese Society for Bioinformatics http://www.jsbi.org attracted a diverse spectrum of submission including papers on synthetic biology, biocomputing, systems biology, computational immunology/vaccinology and disease informatics. Some of the topics will be covered in depth on the third conference day when IIMMS and CBI hold their 3rd Conference of Basic and Clinical Immunogenomics and Immunomics and CBI Workshop on Synthetic Biology, Molecular Robotics and Translational Bioinformatics.
Submissions and review
Of the 108 submissions received, we accepted 15 articles for BMC Bioinformatics, 25 for BMC Genomics[2] and six for Immunome Research[3], an independent BMC journal that publishes bioinformatics-driven immunology research, and one for IPSJ Transactions on Bioinformatics. The submitted articles originated from 19 countries with Taiwan and India contributing almost 43% of submissions and 28% of accepted articles (Fig. 1). Taiwan's proximity to Japan and the success of IncoB2008 [4] in Taipei may explain this very high submission rate. The lower acceptance rate of manuscripts from India compared to that of Taiwan is the result of several submissions that were outside the scope of the three concerned journals. Each submission was peer-reviewed by three PC members and/or sub-reviewers, excepting two, both of which had excellent scores from the reviewers, verified by the editors. In an attempt to raise the quality and impact of manuscripts, we introduced a second round of reviews for revised submissions that were originally judged as borderline papers. Two submissions underwent three rounds of revisions and reviewing before being accepted. We wish to thank the 83 Program Committee members and 56 sub-reviewers (Additional File 1) for lending their precious time, providing objective comments and responding promptly to our multiple review requests.
The challenges and returns of applying bioinformatics research to the areas of disease informatics, structural bioinformatics and drug design, biological databases and tools, systems biology focussing on biological networks and signaling pathways, and sequence analysis are highlighted in this issue.
Disease informatics
Homozygosity mapping is a standard method to identify recessive disease-causing genes if the data size is sufficiently large. Huqun et al. [5] developed a homozygosity mapping tool (qHomozygosityMapping) that can identify recessive disease-causing genes using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays from very small sample sizes. The success of this new approach was confirmed the power of this algorithm using data from six patients with a rare autosomal recessive disease in Japan, the Siiyama-type α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Pennisi and co-workers [6] introduce hybrid agent-based models that simulate the vaccine-elicited immune system response against murine lung metastases. The models aim to maximize the reduction of metastases while minimizing the number of vaccinations.
Structural bioinformatics and inhibitory drug design
In an analysis of intrinsically disordered domains (IDDs) in innate-immune-related proteins in mouse and generic human proteins Teraguchi and co-workers [7] clustered IDDs into sub-groups and associated the clusters with various ordered domains. Ligand- and structure-based virtual screening approaches are typical methods in identifying inhibitor drug candidates. Nagarajan et al. [8] applied 3D-QSAR, recursive partitioning, and docking filters to identify hit compounds that inhibit NIKKβ, an important target in anti-inflammatory drug research. Usman and Wulandari [9] report the docking results of two histone deacetylase family inhibitors. Pharmacological properties gleaned from the result might be useful for designing new inhibitors targeting cervical cancer.
Biological databases and tools
Chen et al. [11] have developed DoDo and efficient method for detecting orthologous genes by using domain information. DoDo outperforms InParanoid [11]. Effectors of Type III Secretion System database (T3SSdb) contains annotations that permit the effective design of prediction models to discover new effector candidates [12].
Systems biology: biological networks and signaling pathways
Protein-protein interactions (PPI) are essential features of many cellular processes. In a large-scale topological analysis of Escherichia coli non-coding small RNA targets in transcription regulatory and PPI networks, Wu et al. [13] identified general modular relationships among the regulatory networks. The findings of experimental and predicted OxyS targets in response to oxidative stress are discussed as proof of concept. Wu and colleagues [14] present a new two-step method that integrates various biological and computational sources using Bayesian statistics or support vector machine methods to construct reliable yeast PPI networks. Some interesting differences in the subcellular locations of proteins between human PPI and metabolic networks were reported by Kumar and Ranganathan [15]. The authors analyzed metabolic pathways, from the viewpoint of subcellular localization of proteins in the networks. In a detailed study of high-mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1) signaling pathway Gong et al. [16] introduced a computational model that simulates the cross-talk between HMGB1 and p53, NFκB, TNF and other signaling pathways that are implicated in cancer. The last paper in the network category takes us through the sensitivity analysis of large biological reaction using time-delayed differential equations (DDEs) [17]. The authors demonstrated the efficacy of their DDEs in numerical interacellular kinetic simulations of the cardiovascular control system and the TNFα signal transduction network.
Sequence analysis
Three papers show the power of computational biology in addressing questions of general biological interest. Okamura et al. [18] present a new method of analyzing methylation patterns. Their analysis of 26 deuterosome genomes revealed a directional transition of methylation patterns from cephalochordates to the urochordate-vertebrate split. The results imply that the mammalian global DNA methylation pattern arose gradually from fractional patterns. Saito et al. [19] extended a previously published base-pairing profile local alignment (BPLA) kernel method for single sequences to predict non-coding RNAs from structure-based aligned sequences of large datasets. BPLA method showed superior prediction accuracy and robustness against errors. Metagenomic sequence analysis requires the taxonomic binning of sequenced reads. Ghosh et al. [20] have improved their earlier algorithm by addressing the binning quality and speed associated.
Conclusion
Conference attendance and networking can provide a rich source of inspirations and excellent opportunities to exchange information on a broad spectrum of cutting-edge biological and computational topics. To advance bioinformatics research, it is important to continuously engage in information exchange. Towards this end, we provided to one author of each article a complimentary one-year membership in the International Society of Computational Biology (ISCB), and hope to see them again at 10th InCoB in Kuala Lumpur in 2011 or at one of the ISCB conferences.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
CS and KN are the Conference Co-chairs and contributed equally the overall organization of InCoB 2010. TWT (APBioNet Secretariat) and SR (President, APBioNet and Publication Committee Chair) provided advice in organizing InCoB2010 and supported post-acceptance manuscript processing.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Christian Schönbach, Email: schoen@bio.kyutech.ac.jp.
Kenta Nakai, Email: knakai@hgc.jp.
Tin Wee Tan, Email: tinwee@bic.nus.edu.sg.
Shoba Ranganathan, Email: shoba.ranganathan@mq.edu.au.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Local Organizing Committee of InCoB2010 for their persistent efforts. Special thanks go to Ms. Yuki Saito for running the InCoB2010 Secretariat. We are grateful to BMC Bioinformatics for their support and encouragement. We also thank Japanese Society for Bioinformatics, Chem-Bio Informatics Society, International Immunomics Society, International Society for Computational Biology, IPSJ Transactions on Bioinformatics, and Bioinformation for support. CS and KN acknowledge the support of Kyushu Institute of Technology and Human Genome Center, respectively.
This article has been published as part of BMC Bioinformatics Volume 11 Supplement 7, 2010: Ninth International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB2010): Bioinformatics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11?issue=S7.
References
- Ranganathan S, Eisenhaber F, Tong JC, Tan TW. Extending Asia Pacific bioinformatics into new realms in the "-omics" era. BMC Genomics. 2009;10(Suppl 3):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S3-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ranganathan S, Schönbach C, Nakai K, Tan TW. Asia Pacific bioinformatics: a 2010 update. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(Suppl 4):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S4-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Immunome Research. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1745-7580/6?issue=S1
- Ranganathan S, Hsu WL, Yang UC, Tan TW. Emerging strengths in Asia Pacific bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(Suppl 12):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S12-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuyama SI, Morino H, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Suzuki T, Kohda M, Kawakami H, Okazaki Y, Seyama K, Hagiwara K. A quantitatively-modeled homozygosity mapping algorithm, qHomozygosityMapping, utilizing whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pennisi M, Pappalardo F, Palladini A, Nicoletti G, Nanni P, Lollini PL, Motta S. Modeling the competition between lung metastases and the immune system using agents. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teraguchi S, Patil A, Standley DM. Intrinsically disordered domains deviate significantly from random sequences in mammalian proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagarajan S, Choo H, Cho YS, Oh KS, Lee BH, Pae AN. IKKβ inhibitor identification: a multi-filter driven novel scaffold. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tambunan USF, Wulandari EK. Identification of a better Homo sapiens Class II HDACs inhibitor through binding energy calculations and descriptor analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen TW, Wu TH, Ng WV, Lin WC. DODO: an efficient orthologous genes assignment tool based on domain architectures. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ostlund G, Schmitt T, Forslund K, Köstler T, Messina DN, Roopra S, Frings O, Sonnhammer EL. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D196–D203. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tay DMM, Govindarajan KR, Khan AM, Ong TYR, Samad HM, Soh WW, Tong M, Zhang F, Tan TW. T3SEdb: Data warehousing of virulence effectors secreted by the bacterial Type III Secretion System. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu TH, Chang IY, Chu LCJ, Huang HC, Ng WV. Modularity of Escherichia coli sRNA regulation revealed by sRNA-target and protein network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu M, Li X, Chua HN, Kwoh CK, Ng SK. Integrating diverse biological and computational sources for reliable protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar G, Ranganathan S. Network analysis of human protein location. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gong H, Zuliani P, Komuravelli A, Faeder JR, Clarke EM. Analysis and verification of the HMGB1 signaling pathway. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu WH, Wang FS, Chang MS. Sensitivity analysis of dynamic biological systems with time-delays. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okamura K, Matsumoto KA, Nakai K. Gradual transition from mosaic to global DNA methylation patterns during deuterostome evolution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saito Y, Sato K, Sakakibara Y. Robust and accurate prediction of noncoding RNAs from aligned sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh TS, Monzoorul Haque M, Mande SS. DiScRIBinATE: A rapid method for accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 7):S14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.